EXAMPLE - Portal Method for Approximate Building Frame Analysis

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
  • Full Portal Method frame analysis example, including assumptions and approximations, determination of assumed column shears, full solution for all frame member forces and the construction of axial, shear and moment diagrams.
    Like my explanations? Check out my full free online textbook at learnaboutstruc...

Комментарии • 60

  • @youenglooi9733
    @youenglooi9733 7 лет назад +6

    you r better than professor in my school ! thx , i love u !

  • @jawadmahmud2552
    @jawadmahmud2552 10 лет назад +2

    Excellently done, professor. Thank you very much.

  • @michaeljofreddoria8139
    @michaeljofreddoria8139 5 лет назад +1

    Im confused about the moment at the left side(moment diagram). . It shows that it is not in equilibrium. 81+111.375 is not equal to 30.375. Which means that the direction is wrong.

  • @engchristianoakuku5741
    @engchristianoakuku5741 5 лет назад +1

    great work proffesor...now i can get the strain energy stored in the frame by Maxwell-Bett theorem.thanks

  • @michaelanthonyabenales
    @michaelanthonyabenales 8 лет назад +2

    is this the analysis that is applicable to ultimate strength design? also, where could i apply moment distribution, is it in ultimate design or working stress design.

  • @alialhameedi990
    @alialhameedi990 7 лет назад +1

    Thanks so much. But I wonder if you can use UDL instead of lateral loads please

  • @abdullahalmahruqi1976
    @abdullahalmahruqi1976 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks man!
    We really appreciate your work

  • @gabrielcentino4001
    @gabrielcentino4001 5 лет назад

    You made me love my course again. Our instructor suck

  • @SamarKenkre
    @SamarKenkre 10 лет назад +3

    Very clearly explained ! Good stuff :)

  • @nishattasnimpriyanka6665
    @nishattasnimpriyanka6665 5 лет назад +1

    Very helpful video. Keep up the good work. Love from Bangladesh :)

  • @MIMRAN65
    @MIMRAN65 4 года назад

    Prof Correct me if I am wrong, based on the assumed direction the axial force in beams are tensile forces instead Compression

  • @caseypoi1
    @caseypoi1 9 лет назад +1

    thank so much for your video. i had some questions if you had a minute.
    1) i saw another example where 2 bays of the same width/stance produced zero axial force in the interior column. would this be true of any number of equal stance bays (say 4 bays), where all interior columns (say 3 column, with the 4 bays) would have zero axial force? is this true regardless of the story heights?
    2) i noticed that n this example and others that the moment of the interior column is twice that of the moments in the exterior columns. how does this hold when there are multiple bays? with 4 bays, would the 3 interior columns each be twice as much as either exterior column?
    thanks again!

  • @dhananjayareddychinnagadi8196
    @dhananjayareddychinnagadi8196 8 лет назад +1

    if u don't mind please upload the same example with substitute frame method also sir..

  • @tadthurston3192
    @tadthurston3192 10 лет назад +2

    Could you show this method for the situation where you had uniform and uniformly decreasing loads instead of point loads on the frame members?

    • @TheCivilProfessor
      @TheCivilProfessor  10 лет назад +1

      I'd love to make more like this one, but it'll have to wait until next semester unfortunately.

  • @benardmbeda5262
    @benardmbeda5262 4 года назад

    Perfectly presented

  • @jan-ainsleylopez-mills6552
    @jan-ainsleylopez-mills6552 2 года назад

    Hi: Did you upload the solution for the Cantilever Method? I would like to view if you would share?

  • @MinanZamia
    @MinanZamia 3 года назад +1

    When you upload cantilever method

  • @BenjaminNPham
    @BenjaminNPham 10 лет назад +2

    This is brilliant. Thank you so much

  • @dvdortiz9031
    @dvdortiz9031 Год назад

    Excellent

  • @jezoo5187
    @jezoo5187 6 лет назад

    i always get confused with the arrows and it makes my algebraic signs wrong :(

  • @proshantatalukder3654
    @proshantatalukder3654 7 лет назад +1

    brilliant work :*

  • @theAnntman
    @theAnntman 4 года назад +1

    How'd you get 13.5 @7:35? Thanks.

    • @franklinfitzgerald2666
      @franklinfitzgerald2666 3 года назад

      Hello, at hinge between H and I, take moments : 1.8x16.88 - 2.25x IF=0 then
      IF= 16.88x1.8/ 2.25 =13.5 ,

  • @diaboloj
    @diaboloj 9 лет назад +1

    Please, at 8:11, how did you get 13.5kN? I can't see any other vertical force given. Thanks

  • @JJNg-sy5kc
    @JJNg-sy5kc 9 лет назад

    Hi, I think you did a mistake at 32:05 where the directions of both beams should be clockwise and direction of column should be counter-clockwise. Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks.

    • @anietieokon6894
      @anietieokon6894 9 лет назад

      Jie Ng nope. it is very correct and excellent. check the moment diagrams carefully

  • @mikaelaabrihan1236
    @mikaelaabrihan1236 6 лет назад

    at 16:15 how did you get the 28.6... when i calculate it shows 28.2

  • @mohd7lo428
    @mohd7lo428 10 лет назад +1

    amazing work, thank you soo much :)

  • @Manga_audrey
    @Manga_audrey 8 лет назад

    please how did you get 50.6

  • @dhananjayareddychinnagadi8196
    @dhananjayareddychinnagadi8196 8 лет назад

    very useful sir.thank u

  • @taongamaiwanga9890
    @taongamaiwanga9890 4 года назад

    Great stuff

  • @huzaifadaya4939
    @huzaifadaya4939 9 лет назад

    How is the distance between H and I, 3 and 2.25 from H to hinge and hinge to I?

    • @Alex-xq7ft
      @Alex-xq7ft 7 лет назад

      Huzaifa Daya if you look on the first figure, span HI is 4.5. H to hinge should be 2.25. He must have been wrong where you saw 3.

  • @mycuisine-andhrastyle5319
    @mycuisine-andhrastyle5319 7 лет назад

    At 15:04 how did u get 84.4,49.5 @4,3

  • @triciamaribontigao7340
    @triciamaribontigao7340 7 лет назад

    @16:05 ... is it 28.6 or 28.2?

  • @shierrajoygabon9262
    @shierrajoygabon9262 7 лет назад

    good morning sir, is there an instances that the exterior columns will have a value of a twice shear?

    • @SuperLetsPlay2010
      @SuperLetsPlay2010 6 лет назад

      if exterior colum is twice as thick as interior column

  • @anubhavitiwari135
    @anubhavitiwari135 10 лет назад +1

    hey can you please specify how you achieved the veertical force when there was none in the first place?

    • @DeanS753
      @DeanS753 9 лет назад

      ***** thankyou for posting this link, helped me out, cheers.

  • @AyeshaMunira
    @AyeshaMunira 9 лет назад

    Thanks Professor :) :)

  • @douglassmith12345678
    @douglassmith12345678 9 лет назад

    at 15:00 how did he get 63KN?

  • @omersaleemYT
    @omersaleemYT 7 лет назад

    Well.. Helping Students in 2017 :D

  • @PinceLordBaay07
    @PinceLordBaay07 9 лет назад

    THNKS FROF...:)

  • @Fawazz19
    @Fawazz19 8 лет назад

    63 is not correct I thinkit is 22.49Thank you

  • @oralsquare
    @oralsquare 6 лет назад

    awesome

  • @audikarl5150
    @audikarl5150 7 лет назад +1

    at least explain how u got the horizontal forces, how u got it

  • @dyarabubakr3373
    @dyarabubakr3373 9 лет назад

    thank u :)

  • @pranaybora5015
    @pranaybora5015 7 лет назад

    can i get ur mail...???

  • @johnnywayne46
    @johnnywayne46 8 лет назад

    10:43 LAWL

  • @kanyewest8844
    @kanyewest8844 7 лет назад

    ILU

  • @jasoncothran9759
    @jasoncothran9759 7 лет назад

    WRONG

  • @ryoma13abby
    @ryoma13abby 9 лет назад

    14:49. How did you get the 63?

    • @qaisalsabahi191
      @qaisalsabahi191 7 лет назад

      Risa Harada i got 49, maybe he's wrong!

    • @Alex-xq7ft
      @Alex-xq7ft 7 лет назад

      Risa Harada if you take moments about the beam hinge, you get 78.755 in tension.

    • @sharifapalmer3321
      @sharifapalmer3321 7 лет назад

      (16.88x1.8+13.5x2.25+45x1.8)/2.25

    • @tristanjeromevillota6965
      @tristanjeromevillota6965 5 лет назад

      The 1.1 should be 1.8, he just wrote it wrong but the answer is correct with the right dimension