The CIA guy and Zizek should debate. I swear, if Zizek had a guy to paraphrase his thoughts, that debate would be reality breaking for the guy in the black suit
No - the guy would just ignore it or has already established reasons in his head why the stuff Zizek tells him is somehow irrelevant for him. Our brain has many mechanisms: One is to stay in a mindset no matter how far away from reality it is.
"I think my ego is smaller" could not be more wrong and presumptuous egoicly as it attempts to elevate oneself thru minimizing the egoic construct. 😊 Low egoic people never talk about how little egoic influence they feel. When you hear "my ego is small" you must assume the opposite of true else why bring it up? Egoicly driven people will reply negatively.
I understand the fact: when we talk about true, since all is relative, we can't 100% agree about almost nothing and that's annoying, specially for scientist. But that "I have a dog" example was so ignorant: if your "dog" belong to a kind that not every scientist agree they are dogs, thinking they belong to another cathegorie, is not abolutelly true (you could have said "Pluto is a planet", but we changed cathegories so it's not true now). Not talking about what it means "I" and "to have" (our notions are similar but you can't define it perfectly, or without disagreement). Not talking about "this is all a dream", or "we live in a program" or any theory that contemplates things are not like we percieve (this last is so accepted). So, philosofically, that was so dumb, despite I get how annoying and frustratintg is to relativice everything. First woman was right: let's do what works, and proved to work, not talk about true, a deep philosophicall concept that you guy will not fix today saying it is so simple.
Conciousnes is more fundamental than what we think fundamental. We mistake ego for conciousnes.,and says AI cannot be Every thing is concious,even a bacteria is concious. Gravity is just a by product.
Regarding Israeli genocidal action, it may not be an "open" institutional policy, but it is clear for all to see that is an institutional policy in actual fact.
Industrial farming is not just profitable, but it's absolutely necessary to feed people. We've eaten most wild animals just to survive to this point. Humans aren't naturally plant eaters, yes its part of the diet, but meat is essential for brain power. The need to hunt i believe has been essential for brain development in human beings. It sets us at the top of planetary intelligence. It's essential to survive whether you like it or not,otherwise, we eat all animals, and then we parish. Peace ✌️ 😎.
Tim Maudlin is going in the right direction. Fundamental Physics. That's where the change needs to happen. The future of physics is EMFSYSTEMS. It gives everything we have and everything we don't have. Peace ✌️ 😎.
I read that a plan to use lasers in space to help with the physics crisis might or has been planned. If you can’t figure planetary energy out then where is the available present solutions
Classical physics is dead! Frame by Frame simulated universe is king- Digital physics, Digital chemistry, digital biology, Bio-quantum brain, all metatagged data results from renders in a Frame by Frame universe- obviously! Long live the Frame by Frame universe- Jesse Daniel Brown- Reimagine everything, and understand consciousness- Theory of unity
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Never saw a better collection of "one of the best takes" and "one of the worst takes" in a single video.
As usual, only Penrose has something interesting to say
Non-interesting comment.
The only one not doing it for profit haha
The CIA guy and Zizek should debate. I swear, if Zizek had a guy to paraphrase his thoughts, that debate would be reality breaking for the guy in the black suit
No - the guy would just ignore it or has already established reasons in his head why the stuff Zizek tells him is somehow irrelevant for him. Our brain has many mechanisms: One is to stay in a mindset no matter how far away from reality it is.
"OK people lose their home and leave their country not to die from starvation, but still it's hard to change my habits" - Rich humans, 2024
So you're vegan then?
@@planetvegan7843 almost
"I think my ego is smaller" could not be more wrong and presumptuous egoicly as it attempts to elevate oneself thru minimizing the egoic construct. 😊 Low egoic people never talk about how little egoic influence they feel.
When you hear "my ego is small" you must assume the opposite of true else why bring it up?
Egoicly driven people will reply negatively.
there is is, one of the reasons quantum physics is absolutely bullshit and probably mostly wrong to its very essence
15:01 no to all questions. Dismantle the UN !!!
I understand the fact: when we talk about true, since all is relative, we can't 100% agree about almost nothing and that's annoying, specially for scientist. But that "I have a dog" example was so ignorant: if your "dog" belong to a kind that not every scientist agree they are dogs, thinking they belong to another cathegorie, is not abolutelly true (you could have said "Pluto is a planet", but we changed cathegories so it's not true now). Not talking about what it means "I" and "to have" (our notions are similar but you can't define it perfectly, or without disagreement). Not talking about "this is all a dream", or "we live in a program" or any theory that contemplates things are not like we percieve (this last is so accepted). So, philosofically, that was so dumb, despite I get how annoying and frustratintg is to relativice everything. First woman was right: let's do what works, and proved to work, not talk about true, a deep philosophicall concept that you guy will not fix today saying it is so simple.
Study English first, please😅
This starts with the most comical statement of reality. Get ready to be trolled all through 2025 by these scientists that have destroyed our world
Just ask Petraeus, "When will see see peace and freedom?"
1 - no
2 - Conflict is bound to happen in a capitalist world
3 - yes
4 - yes, if we don't end inequality
“No if we don’t end inequality?”
I assume you know that’s it’s not a literal possibility. With that in mind, what exactly did you mean in #4?
Inequality is an intrinsic feature of rrality. Read Leibniz
The only person who deserves your time here is Sir Roger Penrose!
And Sabine Hossenfelder, who is on the panel, but not allowed to say a single word.
No, Slavoj Zizek is great too
@@biskit8050 bruhhh!! Only thing Philosophers do now a days is to have opinions about everything without knowing anything.
They split the baby in half. The only one wiser than Solomon was Tyrus. Good guess on that one right
@@RishabhKhatri-rt9pfAgree, but Slavoj Zizek is funny at least, Tim Maudlin is a biased arrogant boring.
Conciousnes is more fundamental than what we think fundamental. We mistake ego for conciousnes.,and says AI cannot be Every thing is concious,even a bacteria is concious. Gravity is just a by product.
31:41 except freedom of speech, ain’t that right Judy?😂
What??!! No Sean Carroll, Brian Cox, Lawrence Kraus, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye The Science Guy???😂😂😂
Regarding Israeli genocidal action, it may not be an "open" institutional policy, but it is clear for all to see that is an institutional policy in actual fact.
Just like the institutional policies protecting the rich from consequences over the poor. It's not directly stated, but it's clearly visible.
You lost me on Kisin...
2:21 *BIT you have the biggest ego, you're a darned physicist. that's exactly what someone with a huge ego would say.
I came here for Sir Rodger Penrose but Oh the Humanities!🙉🙈
Lots of talking, very few objective conclusions.
Kisin is not a thinker….
He reflects a big part of western society, as bad as that sounds
He is to some of us
Yet somehow, the right wing crimes against humanity supporting grifter is platformed everywhere. He clearly has some powerful backers.
Because you don't agree with him? Turns out you cannot think too.
What is Kisin doing here he is a vandal and bad faith actor.
I'd have a Butler, but def not silly Judith.
I honestly think she's mentally ill. She's abstracted herself so far away from the concrete world that she cant even feel the ground anymore.
Maudlin is utterly 3rd rate😅
Industrial farming is not just profitable, but it's absolutely necessary to feed people. We've eaten most wild animals just to survive to this point. Humans aren't naturally plant eaters, yes its part of the diet, but meat is essential for brain power. The need to hunt i believe has been essential for brain development in human beings. It sets us at the top of planetary intelligence. It's essential to survive whether you like it or not,otherwise, we eat all animals, and then we parish. Peace ✌️ 😎.
Environmental science needs to be an outcome and included in the theory. Opinion. Peace ✌️ 😎. In local theory.
colonial scissors
Tim Maudlin is going in the right direction. Fundamental Physics. That's where the change needs to happen. The future of physics is EMFSYSTEMS. It gives everything we have and everything we don't have. Peace ✌️ 😎.
He´s incredible biased about QM.
I read that a plan to use lasers in space to help with the physics crisis might or has been planned. If you can’t figure planetary energy out then where is the available present solutions
Classical physics is dead! Frame by Frame simulated universe is king- Digital physics, Digital chemistry, digital biology, Bio-quantum brain, all metatagged data results from renders in a Frame by Frame universe- obviously! Long live the Frame by Frame universe- Jesse Daniel Brown- Reimagine everything, and understand consciousness- Theory of unity
green propaganda
each person focus on God free will sovereignty