"if we made the prototype once, we can do it again"... Yeah , but the kid shouldn't have been on the road. Natural selection. Also. If you made a kid once, you can do it again
Alot of these questions aren't that difficult to answer, they just try to make you feel bad for your choices. Like murdering the tourist to save others.
@@mattk6272 The morally correct answer is to not kill the tourist, but then again you could’ve saved 5 people and only lose one. How is that an easy decision.
![MiKiKeiVod "DisguisedToast" horror games with miyoung [The Closing Shift] ^_^ 04|22|22](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SZhmBzMnJSU/mqdefault.jpg)
"if we made the prototype once, we can do it again"... Yeah , but the kid shouldn't have been on the road. Natural selection. Also. If you made a kid once, you can do it again
just bc you losers hate children and are willing to murder them doesn’t mean that everyone is as brain-dead as you are
Alot of these questions aren't that difficult to answer, they just try to make you feel bad for your choices. Like murdering the tourist to save others.
Wait, you would kill someone who has nothing to do with the problem itself?
@@charles9590 no I meant theres a very obvious morally correct answer there its not a hard decision
@@mattk6272 The morally correct answer is to not kill the tourist, but then again you could’ve saved 5 people and only lose one. How is that an easy decision.
@@aClownBaby- you don't get to pick and choose who lives and who dies. Let nature take its course unless someone someone consents to organ harvest
what is the difference between pulling the lever and pushing a man on the tracks, or even killing him directly?
did he continue playing this game?