Great tutorial. The only thing I would do different is the last curved feature sketching and creation method. I would convert entities of the edges of the part so if I change anything it will follow the part shapes. The last feature may not regenerate properly if the dimensions of the other features are modified substantially. Other than that, I'd follow all the other feature creation steps for sure! Thanks and have a great day!
For the final cut, instead of that line we can use convert entity on the edge and trim the rest of the circle. Also, instead of that 45mm dimensioning, we can hold shift and dimension from the bottom of the circle to the edge.
Where in the 2D drawing does it indicate that the center of the circular cut-out is located vertical of the long edge created by the obtuse angle? I heard the instructor say it out loud, but it seems to me that the drawing is missing one construction line required to fully indicated the placement of the center of the circle directly above that edge.
if the bodies were not merged, then you can select what bodies the feature will be applied on. so no need to trim the circle. also, the way the circle was defined should be from the edge but select minimum from the leader instead of defining from center of the circle and set it to be 5mm.
At 8:26 how did you know it would be 150 deg? The angle of that slope was not defined by you when the profile was created. I see no marking on the drawing to designate that slope at 120 deg. I was able to create the exact plane using the 30 deg given and referencing off the upper surface.
Hi, In SOLIDWORKS im updating the dimensions in equation and dimensions are updating but solidworks is not updating the dimensions of part. how to fix this.
they look easy but they aren't because they ask you the mass of the design at the end of the question to make sure you did it accurately. They give you 4 options to choose the mass from and you have to choose the correct one
@@henriquehertz Absolutely disagree! For designing you need a professional grade GPU, preferably an nVidia Quadro for SolidWorks (an AMD Firepro is also suitable). The laptop age and specification depends on budget, but for a beginner I would recommend an DELL Precision M6700. If your budget is higher, then go for the latest model you can afford (I currently run a Precision 7730 with Quadro P4000 and 32GB RAM). HP and Lenovo also make very good workstation class laptops. Gaming laptops are *NOT* recommended if you're serious about designing!
@@MrMairu555 i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
@@henriquehertz i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
I think he made a mistake. The radius for the top slanted surface is stated as r35 but in his model the radius would only be 25. You can make an r35 circle centred where the other circle is and just powertrim the lower half. This would probably work best if you just use one sketch for all the features
@@runtime_engineer it wasn't very hard Most important thing is speed It's just what you do in cswa but waayyyy faster I'd suggest focus on assembly problems and practice part editing, making models from drawing as much as you can
@@enriqueherreradavalos1937 If you apply 6061 Alloy (stated in the pdf) with density of 0.0027g/mm3, the mass of the part I got was *2040.57 grams* which is one of the option in the pdf.
Full of adds every minute or less than a MINUTE. I have videos but never less than 3 minutes. How could you do it? After two ads, I thumb down and exited.
Please don't speak in english if you have difficulty. Speak in hindi or prepare your script because not only gets difficult to understand but also annoying because aap kuch ka kuch kahre h vedio m and it gets confusing. Thank you !
Why I think your part is not the best way make a good parametric part... Why you don't extrude the first function both side. Why you make yours sketches that difficult... Mores sketches less problem... The worst, the hole on the left.... 😂 making an extrusion to make the half, and then redo a cut.... Erk! I think you don't work with a real parts... Make a part like yours and modify it, and the features tree explodes literally.. Make a test. Make a square plate. Make an hole. Repeat it 10 times. Repeat the previous repeat then times on the perpendicular side. 100 holes. Check models analysis and watch refresh time. Make the same part with 1 or 2 sketch.... Cry, and check the perfs.... The result is OK, the way is shit...
I like how he calls this simple. Excellent tutorial!
Great job. Definitely feel like I got the hang of the design thought process
Great tutorial. The only thing I would do different is the last curved feature sketching and creation method. I would convert entities of the edges of the part so if I change anything it will follow the part shapes. The last feature may not regenerate properly if the dimensions of the other features are modified substantially. Other than that, I'd follow all the other feature creation steps for sure! Thanks and have a great day!
Thank you so much! You make it look so easy.
I like the way you explain everything. Keep up and thank you
Thank you so much for all your videos, explanations, and most of all your time.
The right way to do it. Simple, neat and clear. Congrats!
So many kids nowadays are putting up SW tutorials on YT, which are totally cr@p.
these kids have just no clue of what they are doing
YOU ARE THE BEST BRO, EXPLANATIONS ARE PERFECT!
KEEP IT UP I LOVE YOUR CHANNEL
AND PLEASE MAKE CAR CARS PARTS DESIGN, ....
Thank you CAD CAM Tutorials, I have done this exercise in fusion 360
the design intent is everything, take a moment to view and know where to start
Great job - most helpful- you are a lifesaver!
lightning speed! i've been using SW for years and wouldn't be able bang this out in twice the time!
probably SW is the only thing that these people do on a PC
Thanks! The best in the World.
For the final cut, instead of that line we can use convert entity on the edge and trim the rest of the circle. Also, instead of that 45mm dimensioning, we can hold shift and dimension from the bottom of the circle to the edge.
I agree. It would allow for better feature regeneration if the other feature specs are modified. Have a great day!
Thank you very much I like the way you explain everything
Çok teşekkür ederim. (Thank you very much)
Well explained. Thank you Teacher
Great tutorial. Thanks for Sharing.
Thank you kind sir. Amazing content.
thanks man this was reeally good practice
Hello thank you very much for your tutorials.
Amazing and cool tutorial
great explainer!
Thanks man you are awesome.
Can you please make more CSWA prep videos!??
Awesome!
Thanks a milion!
sir thank you sir . very excellent job.. greetings from your friend in saudi of arabia. chers
Very much thanks for your videos 👌✅
Where in the 2D drawing does it indicate that the center of the circular cut-out is located vertical of the long edge created by the obtuse angle? I heard the instructor say it out loud, but it seems to me that the drawing is missing one construction line required to fully indicated the placement of the center of the circle directly above that edge.
Very helpful!!
i-really-enjoy-it-thanks-a-milion-SIR
أحسنت
Thanks very good
Great video
thank you cad cam ..mersi.
Explain is excellent
great video bro
Very grateful design sir your voice very nice😁😁😁
Very nice sir.
thanks very helpful
very pro! I wish i have your brains
if the bodies were not merged, then you can select what bodies the feature will be applied on. so no need to trim the circle. also, the way the circle was defined should be from the edge but select minimum from the leader instead of defining from center of the circle and set it to be 5mm.
how did you enable the different view buttons on the top right? Those are so useful.
new version of solid works 2018 (cam feature), how to learn it and please some videos upload on it.
good vodeo bro
Very good sir
This is so nice . You must work really hard! let's be friends
i like the way you talk
i love you for this holy shit
think you so mutch
thanks :)
Nice
This is not simple though. Thanks for video
Спасибо Вам за урок.👍
Thanx
At 8:26 how did you know it would be 150 deg? The angle of that slope was not defined by you when the profile was created. I see no marking on the drawing to designate that slope at 120 deg. I was able to create the exact plane using the 30 deg given and referencing off the upper surface.
150 deg or 30 deg are both the same angle from different perspectives when you flip the offset
Hi, In SOLIDWORKS im updating the dimensions in equation and dimensions are updating but solidworks is not updating the dimensions of part.
how to fix this.
@1:30 how are seamlessly drawing a line by adequate dimensions
Thank you for sharing.
please tell me how to do automatically converse to Arc function.
Hover over the point you just finished drawing a line to, it will convert into a tangent arc
Sir I'm little bit confuse about selecting a plane on a feature?! Explain me
Hello, great tutorial! How did you know you had to cut through all, is it because there are no depth dimensions for the cut? Thank you!
In the pdf it states, "All holes through all, unless otherwise specified"
Best teacher.
wait im a bit slow where did you get 45mm 14:20
Thanks I learned a lot from this, but I don't understand how you got the 150degrees for the second plane
the reference angle in the drawing is 30 degrees. 180 - 30 = 150 deg
kindly sir I want to know the name of this part.?
those are the kinda exams they do?
damn
why havent i done the certification yet
looks easy as hell
they look easy but they aren't because they ask you the mass of the design at the end of the question to make sure you did it accurately. They give you 4 options to choose the mass from and you have to choose the correct one
Hello sir
Please make a video on CSWA. That is how can apply and can crack better way
sir I wan to ask about the result of this model what we use kind of materical and what is it weight??
Can we draw the same thing in autocad 2d , if there is any material or something plz refer me ✌️
Do we have to take the exam immediately when we order the CSWA exam or can we activate it anytime?
There is a time limit for sure. I got my exam from school and code expires two months from when it was activated.
Where can I find excercise drawings like this one?
Hello, I'm searching for the same too, did you get some of these around here?
Which laptop I should buy for designing ??
Hi. I'm brazilian. I have a Samsung Odyssei (i7 + GTX Geforce). PC gamers are recomended for Design. I like MSI, Razer Laptops, Dell Gaming
@@henriquehertz Absolutely disagree! For designing you need a professional grade GPU, preferably an nVidia Quadro for SolidWorks (an AMD Firepro is also suitable). The laptop age and specification depends on budget, but for a beginner I would recommend an DELL Precision M6700. If your budget is higher, then go for the latest model you can afford (I currently run a Precision 7730 with Quadro P4000 and 32GB RAM). HP and Lenovo also make very good workstation class laptops. Gaming laptops are *NOT* recommended if you're serious about designing!
@@MrMairu555 i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
@@henriquehertz i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
i guess for beginners even a normal machine with i3 processor with in built GPU or software rendering would also not be a problem at all. Though latest versions of Solidworks would work smoother on higher configuration machines. I am using i3 machines and i7 both. i7 helps when i am designing a component with long history and need to do rebuilds again and again or in case of simulations. If you have smaller ram then your big files may stuck or hang very often. so make sure you have higher capacity of RAM if your program stuck. best of luck.
give me drawing and dimensions (orthographic view) to create 3d model
can you make french press in solidworks?
Why don't you make it?
I think he made a mistake. The radius for the top slanted surface is stated as r35 but in his model the radius would only be 25.
You can make an r35 circle centred where the other circle is and just powertrim the lower half. This would probably work best if you just use one sketch for all the features
I did everything as told and selected the proper material as well and answer is not matching any option and it's between 2 options
6061 Alloy with 0.0027g/mm3 density -> the mass should be 2040.57 grams
@@runtime_engineer damn I am cswp now...
@@hajmola7605 what did you do for practice? Was is hard? Did you took CSWA? I'm taking CSWA next month and probably CSWP next year.
@@runtime_engineer it wasn't very hard
Most important thing is speed
It's just what you do in cswa but waayyyy faster
I'd suggest focus on assembly problems and practice part editing, making models from drawing as much as you can
Bro where can we find 2d drawings
Can I get a drawing of this part?
U have pdf for the exercise
what is the name of this
part
how does that 30 degree angle become 150 degree can anyone help in that
It's a complementary angle
Simpe bro 180-30 =150
That's all it takes to be "certified"?
bro to do it in Autocad please
anybody knows the name of the object?
BOSS
I am a student of btech mechanical of 8sem and currently i am purchasing my training (6months)
So suggest me the best laptop 💻 under 45000
Plzz 💐😇
I am using i5, 2GB graphic card, 8GB RAM (HP, MSeries, it's 5 years old now). It's working awesome. Under 45k you can get i7, 8GB RAM
@@lylaaxiom8750 Not big assemblies but small one's without any issues. Also it depends how big are you assuming
What is the mass of the part? 2040 grams?
Which material did you applied? I haven't applied any material and my mass is 750.26 grams.
@@runtime_engineer I get 769.27 gr, I measure all the part and it's fine I didn't apply any material
@@enriqueherreradavalos1937 I'm gonna remake that model and see what I get again.
@@enriqueherreradavalos1937 If you apply 6061 Alloy (stated in the pdf) with density of 0.0027g/mm3, the mass of the part I got was *2040.57 grams* which is one of the option in the pdf.
@@runtime_engineer thanks :)
Why are all Indian are solid works pro?
Full of adds every minute or less than a MINUTE. I have videos but never less than 3 minutes. How could you do it? After two ads, I thumb down and exited.
your loss it was a good video and they gotta eat mate.
Hello sir I have cracked certified Solidworks Professional
hii bro...
i want to talk with you about solidworks professional certification.
if you don't mind give me your contact detail or email id
please could you put a pdf for your drawing . thanks
100 Likes ...
I will send u a drawing for practice can u make for me?
Send me thise cad
dat was izi.
If you dont understand subject there will be always indian that can teach you better than your professor
Simple? 🤣
Please don't speak in english if you have difficulty. Speak in hindi or prepare your script because not only gets difficult to understand but also annoying because aap kuch ka kuch kahre h vedio m and it gets confusing. Thank you !
You are rude don’t watch.
Why I think your part is not the best way make a good parametric part...
Why you don't extrude the first function both side.
Why you make yours sketches that difficult... Mores sketches less problem...
The worst, the hole on the left.... 😂 making an extrusion to make the half, and then redo a cut.... Erk!
I think you don't work with a real parts... Make a part like yours and modify it, and the features tree explodes literally..
Make a test.
Make a square plate. Make an hole. Repeat it 10 times. Repeat the previous repeat then times on the perpendicular side.
100 holes. Check models analysis and watch refresh time.
Make the same part with 1 or 2 sketch.... Cry, and check the perfs....
The result is OK, the way is shit...
Nice