Understanding the DMCA: An Overview
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 окт 2018
- In 1998, Congress passed the DMCA in order to address online copyright infringement while balancing the interests of internet users, creators, and service providers. Learn the history of this legislation and how it works in the digital age.
How is Twitch streamers playing music on their streams any different than listening to music on the radio? This whole act is severely outdated and needs to be reviewed and updated.
Because Radio Stations pay for the distribution license.
@@kristiantorres785 the question then is, how can streamers get that license and why are these companies making that knowledge so hard to access?
@@dropkickpherby6994 You can go to BMS and ASCAP for a license. It is easy to get.
The main legal issue is that you're broadcasting the music to the viewers of the stream without a license. Essentially, you're distributing someone else's work without their permission. When you "buy a song", you're really just buying the license to listen to it. You're not buying a license to distribute it. Another issue arises when you're getting paid from that stream. One could make the argument that the music enhances the stream, and thus you're profiting (at least in part) from someone else's work.
I thought COPPA was enough.
Ikr
Yea
Coppa did barely anything but disable autoplay on certain videos
This act is outdated and should be rewritten
I miss the old Times when the politicians and the Music companys dont understand a shit about internet, what a good old times
You mean 2021?
Can you not bribe politicians to put twitch streamers in jail
They need to update this this is like 2 decades ago
I got a copyright strike for using a song that wasn't even in the video
If I were to make copyright law I would make it so you can only take the money from the percentage of the video that was copyrighted. I would also make sites check if the copyright is valid by sending the money to a bank of sorts, then review the claim. If the claimer was right the creator's money would then go to the company and if they were wrong then it would go to the creator
And I would make it so if a site relies on copyrighted material (torrents and so on) you could bring it to a digital court to be reviewed and taken down if it doesn't comply with the law
Ah yes, 1998. Surely the internet is the same nowadays so there is no need to upgrade, right?
Bois I introduce you DMCA. But what is it? This is COPPA but with extra steps and it's outdated
Yeah
It's working against new webmasters, and make so much more benefits for huge companies.
If the DMCA passes the new act of imprisoning streamers for having 5 seconds of a song in their background or having a copyrighted in-game sound affect be played, there will be big problems and most likely chaos.
almost sounds like the end of the world for the gaming community if its true
Who was sent by Jesus
me
@@XenoZen_ me
We
Me. This has to end!!!!
@@M64bros yes
Imagine humming in your own RUclips video, and you got jail time by the dmca.... Like for real
Hello
My website is not showing on search results
Someone complained DMCA TO GOOGLE how to fix this
Please help me
People should just play copyrighted music anyways. If enough people do it, they can’t stop us all.
why music is still copyrighted in 2020?
Well the artist has to make money from their music somehow
@@michaelc.5809 lives?
i'd rather agree with coppa then agreeing with jail time just for singing to copyright music
agreed.
its just making it more unbalance
i mean
who knows if Corona is in the jail or something
Well guess what? It sucks and used against people who are using material fairly
I still don’t get it. So you’re telling me artists of music for example, don’t want the free advertisement a streamer or a RUclipsr brings them? How many RUclips videos have you seen where people go and ask “what song is this playing?”. Wouldn’t that help an artist gain some new fans and possibly some new revenue as long as the creator was giving the props to that artist so everyone knows who made that piece of music? It puzzles me, if someone could explain I’d greatly appreciate it.
That doesn't really have anything to do with copyright law. In the end, the copyright holder makes the DMCA request, so they don't want the infringement. If an artist wanted their song to be used for exposure purposes, it would be best for the content creator to acquire written consent from the label that owns the copyright. The "wishes" of an artist don't matter in the application of the law. If the artist owns the copyright and there is an infringement, they can choose to file a DMCA request. But artists usually don't hold the copyrights for their song, labels do.
@@drabberjewel7108 That's kinda shitty that the artists usually don't own their own songs
@@michaelc.5809 It's their choice. Most choose not to by signing with a label.
This will effect many people like gachatubers (the good ones) and animators. And I thought COPPA was bad
Coppa isn’t bad, it’s RUclips for avoiding COPPA in the first place
@@knightrl3576 true
Way to sweep the problem under the rug.
This needs to be updated
I swear we need to protest this garbage. This is absolutely fkn ridiculous!!!
But now alinity, pokimane, Suzy lu don't ask you to please get rid of it they just flag your videos and report your stuff and you get an immediate copystrike.
#stopDmca
who is here to learn what does DMCA because what big games Preston done to innocent developers?
You know why you’re here.
#stopdmca everyone spam this or not just make a video about it
A true bruh moment
i got my internet suspended for fucking watching one piece ??? bro im just 13
Your...internet?
first of all ... what is a copy? .. well a copy is not the original ..or .. a original copy......fine... ok ...its not the original ... ok then ..... now what is a right? .... well a right... is a accordance with fact, reason, and or truth! .....
..and so we put those two words together! COPY RIGHT!....now with this in mind. .. let say i have a copy of a song ... its not the original ..it could be a original copy from the original creator that allowed a company to make original copy to sell by the original owners discretion of course.....as a copy .(now where i got this copy from does not matter really it doesn't .as long as i tell you or anyone that what i have... is a copy ) ...AND i go around saying YES THIS SONG I HAVE IN POSSESSION IS A COPY ...NOT THE ORIGINAL ....A COPY!.... that GOOD!....because that is truth .. nothing to hide there... no point too..... with fact and reason.....now if i go around with this copy of the song in my possession saying .. YES! i am the original creator of this song AND no one else made this song but me! ... well ...there a big problem with that! ..... a very big problem....first of all ..... some one who originally created or was allowed by the original owner to have a company /. label ...make the original copy .... .. will find me ...and say HEY!! YOU ARE NOT THE ORIGINAL CREATOR OF THIS SONG! I AM!!! AND I AM SURE I CAN PROVE IT! ..well one thing.... i can decide to challenge that case... but knowing personally that i am really not the original creator of that song ... im totally screwed...especially if i was selling the copy while claiming its a original copy...... so i will reveal the truth to save my own ....saying no its not the original ....its a copy .. sorry for the inconvenience...then they can say good .. now don't let it happen again ..also the people who i sold the original copy too will either forgive me or say ... hey i want my money back!....yikes ..... now that is what copy right is and how it always should be....oh and you can also tell them if anyone want a quality original copy buy it from the original owner label.....it will always be the best to buy the original copy you will always get such great quality with it... .. anywhere else .. is just a copy...now .. can i play this copy ... of mine .. for everyone else to hear? sure.. why not ??? as long as i don't tell every one .. HEY THIS SONG YOUR HEARING .. ITS MINE I CREATED IT ..then i will be in trouble .. obviously .... why would the original owner of the song .. make a song .. to make sure one one else would hear it ....? especially after its already purchased ? does not make sense at all.... am i wrong?
Only here because of penn foster hs
Arent we glad america controls the internet cause of a law made before a majority of its core users now were even born? The web used to be less bull crap and more information at the cost of time because the net was slow. Now the nets fast but the laws and times are slow to change.
😭roblox ustr got dmca😢
Thanks to your law all my favourite youtubers and maybe me might go jail. Think and rewrite your awful, awful law.
Bwaaah streamer play our song give us money or we take down you videos
D-M-C-A,its fun to get a strike from D-M-C-A,you can move to youtube D-M-C-A
Ugh dmca.