Preisdent Biden CALLED OUT For HYPOCRISY Over China Tariffs

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 май 2024
  • Briahna Joy Gray and Robby Soave discuss President Biden's new tariffs on Chinese goods. #Biden #China #Xi Jinping #Tarrifs Originally aired May 16, 2024
    About Rising:
    Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.
    Follow Rising on social media:
    Website: Hill.TV
    Facebook: HillTVLive/
    Instagram: @HillTVLive
    Twitter: @HillTVLive

Комментарии • 497

  • @neonboy99
    @neonboy99 13 дней назад +41

    In the end the whole world is driving around $10,000 EVs while Americans have fork out $50,000 for one.

    • @pohmoh3590
      @pohmoh3590 10 дней назад

      Nope. Muricans cannot afford expensive EVs. You will be left behind with old tech ICE cars 😂

    • @A.N.N.E.X
      @A.N.N.E.X 8 дней назад

      Cap 🧢 you can get EVs pretty cheaply nowadays although not new ones 😂

    • @jaredkaye3669
      @jaredkaye3669 6 дней назад

      My 2013 volt was 8,000 in 2019. I put a 500 watt stereo in it blasting bzrp #56 while head banging instead of engine sounds.

  • @usiohaki295
    @usiohaki295 13 дней назад +106

    Well politicians are largely hypocrites.

  • @andrewchong2616
    @andrewchong2616 13 дней назад +184

    The US still thinking they can down China’s tech industry like how they taking down Toshiba in the 80s. 😂😂😂

    • @timpaull9340
      @timpaull9340 13 дней назад +13

      Pure hubris

    • @lenkiatleong
      @lenkiatleong 13 дней назад +24

      The source of this thinking process is because American leaders could not differentiate Japanese, Koreans and the Chinese. These leaders thought that they are all the same, i.e., inferior.

    • @HellBot-gi5si
      @HellBot-gi5si 13 дней назад

      You have to understand Andrew, this is political American theater. Yes, Donald Trump and Joe Biden did put some tariffs on Chinese steel, aluminum, and EV's. But read an economic report. Last year America and China did a record breaking $758 billion dollar in trade in single calendar year. So don't be fool and read an economic report.

    • @hengongchua6250
      @hengongchua6250 13 дней назад +14

      They are still having daydreams. Chinese are not Japanese or Indian.

    • @magnacarta740
      @magnacarta740 13 дней назад +10

      @andrewchong2616, the US did the same to the French Alstrom!

  • @Ds10lm
    @Ds10lm 13 дней назад +48

    How did we end up with Trump and Biden again

    • @jveebklyn1644
      @jveebklyn1644 13 дней назад +1

      Your comment should have 1,000,000 👍. It's too bad the MSM is so complicit in the duopoly.

    • @kaylaharrop7639
      @kaylaharrop7639 12 дней назад

      Rfk 2024

    • @Usersf134ssk
      @Usersf134ssk 12 дней назад +4

      As an asian, my exact question. How did you end up with those 2?

    • @kaylaharrop7639
      @kaylaharrop7639 12 дней назад

      @Usersf134ssk democracy is an illusion and everything is manipulated by the elites.

    • @jveebklyn1644
      @jveebklyn1644 12 дней назад +5

      @@Usersf134ssk A lot of Americans have the same question.

  • @nolisto1
    @nolisto1 13 дней назад +95

    Democrats, let's save the environment by trying to get everone to drive EV's. Also, let's put a 100% of cheap EV's. lol. Now I don't care about whether or not the US places tariffs on Chinese goods, but these politicians are liars.

    • @thefourthrabbit9516
      @thefourthrabbit9516 13 дней назад

      The best part is that the tariffs are imposed on goods that will never arrive. The Chinese saw this coming miles away, so their EV companies never planned to sell in the US market anyway. This is why they don't even bother to retaliate.
      But they probably are preparing for Trump's second term right now.

  • @virgolopez2840
    @virgolopez2840 13 дней назад +76

    I have been a Democrat all my life and I'm 50. This is going be the first year I am not going to vote Democrat (not going to vote for Trump either). Let the free market decide and not some misguided tariff if I want to support our own US industry. If the American people want to support our US car industry, let them decide with their wallet. If they want to pay more and buy inferior American EVs, then they have the right. Biden is taking that right from me and my family. With high inflation and high taxes, why would he take this choice away? Isn't it about pro-choice?

    • @Ravi50237
      @Ravi50237 13 дней назад +12

      Raffifs are good if they’re serving the public, but Biden tariffs are to serve the rich

    • @ignatiuschua5268
      @ignatiuschua5268 13 дней назад +1

      Jill Stein is neither and that is how you can hope that both the above cannot be the president if she wins.

    • @SeleneDing
      @SeleneDing 13 дней назад

      @@Ravi50237 such tariffs aren't even serving the rich, since no meanful EV production in US anyway except tesla. tesla also heavily relies on its china mega factory, without which it'd be bankrupt by now. these tariffs are just serving Brandon himself, to deceive those stupids.

    • @enterpriseinfinite4900
      @enterpriseinfinite4900 13 дней назад +1

      @virgolopez2840
      Very well said.

    • @mouseisbroken
      @mouseisbroken 13 дней назад +2

      US counts for just 1% of Chinese car export, the tariff is all about showing he can be tough on China without actually getting into another real conflict with China.

  • @13Liberty50
    @13Liberty50 13 дней назад +82

    Brought to you by President Two Face Joe Biden

  • @Ben-vr6qz
    @Ben-vr6qz 13 дней назад +57

    There is no comparable American industry he is trying to protect.

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 13 дней назад

      Oh he's protecting the oil and legacy auto industry. The tariffs on batteries and chips combined with inflated EV prices means any EV made in America can neither be exported nor sold locally. Thanks to the tariffs the current arrangement where EV makers import affordable batteries from China, build the EV in America, then exporting cars abroad is no longer viable, from now on if they want to export they must move all production to China.

  • @eddieriebesehl9381
    @eddieriebesehl9381 13 дней назад +80

    if there was an award for biggest liar, joe would win, he's done it all his life

  • @yaoypl
    @yaoypl 13 дней назад +23

    Protectionism gives domestic producers the right to charge high prices without worrying about competition.

    • @bangbangyt1641
      @bangbangyt1641 11 дней назад +2

      The long term no one buy usa car only american suffer to buy higher price of car.

  • @rudyalfonsus686
    @rudyalfonsus686 13 дней назад +15

    literally he was saying to its people : Don't buy cheap stuffs, buy expensive ones

  • @eaglestar2962
    @eaglestar2962 13 дней назад +19

    Tariffs remove American competitiveness. Also, the people in the US will need to pay higher for everything.

    • @bangbangyt1641
      @bangbangyt1641 11 дней назад

      The people outside will have to pay lower.

  • @davidlaw9686
    @davidlaw9686 13 дней назад +19

    Hypocrites calling out others hypocrites.

  • @jdk9374
    @jdk9374 13 дней назад +68

    Sad reality is there is no good choice between Biden and Trump

    • @eddieromero2949
      @eddieromero2949 13 дней назад +3

      Sad reality You still living in a shell

    • @underconstruction4413
      @underconstruction4413 13 дней назад +6

      There are CHOICES which are BETTER! You just have to be willing to STOP upholding the STATUS QUO and leave your COMFORT ZONE!

    • @workingman-xl6xh
      @workingman-xl6xh 13 дней назад

      I will always vote for an outsider rather than career politician. The DC Swamp is so bad, I don't understand how anyone would want to be president today. It is weaponized and our leaders are all corrupt.

    • @Mman.
      @Mman. 13 дней назад

      @@eddieromero2949what??

    • @DM-sy4hg
      @DM-sy4hg 13 дней назад

      Trump 2024. It's easy.

  • @user-zi2rg3qh3i
    @user-zi2rg3qh3i 13 дней назад +32

    That tariff not meant to hurt china it was a to hurt the US citizen which will be the one who suffer of that higher taxes again😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @serenachen9385
      @serenachen9385 13 дней назад +1

      Their car over price can't sell

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      Boycott

    • @alexleanh
      @alexleanh 11 дней назад +3

      @@serenachen9385 Yeah, maybe NOT in the US... but they're just as happy (and more successful) selling them in Mexico, Canada, the EU, Australia, New Zealand, and the rest of Africa and Asia.

    • @archstanton5973
      @archstanton5973 8 дней назад

      Ain't gonna hurt "US citizen" cause that US citizen just ain't gonna buy/CAN'T AFFORD that 50,000 dollar EV.
      Then as OVERPRICED EVs don't move it's back to with "cheap" Japanese and Korean ICEs and the whole "must decarbonize" will disappear from the MURCAN! world......
      MURCA! will be the island of ICE while the rest of the planet is moving further and further into EVs.

  • @hermesliteratus882
    @hermesliteratus882 13 дней назад +16

    Anyone with integrity is not qualified to be a politician.

  • @MgWynn
    @MgWynn 14 дней назад +65

    It's not competition anymore. It's protection for American car makers. The rest of the world is enjoying very good and cheap Chinese EVs right now.

    • @WeAreItt
      @WeAreItt 13 дней назад +11

      Maybe the CEOs should take a pay cut so the EV cars are cheap

    • @spankyssurprise1361
      @spankyssurprise1361 13 дней назад +5

      ​@@WeAreIttYeah that won't move the needle much.

    • @patricej3481
      @patricej3481 13 дней назад +4

      The protectionism comes too little too late. What did everybody think was going to happen if we demand cheaper and cheaper products?
      So sorry American workers you can't get a job in the United States but you can buy widgets from China for a dollar!

    • @WeAreItt
      @WeAreItt 13 дней назад +1

      @@spankyssurprise1361
      So you’re saying china is just better ?

    • @spankyssurprise1361
      @spankyssurprise1361 13 дней назад +2

      @@WeAreItt No, they don't have the same environmental regulations, safety regulations or labor regulations. Hard to compete fairly with that. But like I said cutting CEO pay won't do much....if anything.

  • @cherubimcherubim9515
    @cherubimcherubim9515 13 дней назад +32

    American should prepare to be tax in the form of tariffs whoever win the whitehouse.

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      Not all that surprising really. Republicans used to be for free trade until Trump took over. Why do you think the Dems were largely silent while he unilaterally imposed tariffs like there was no tomorrow? He was doing their job for them.

  • @irhclan105
    @irhclan105 13 дней назад +20

    Why can’t we just have a competent, functioning adult as president?

    • @2002S40
      @2002S40 13 дней назад

      Then you should never vote DemonRats.

  • @mgs9735
    @mgs9735 13 дней назад +31

    The problem is that regular folks like us will pay for the price. These politicians dont care.

  • @freeworld88888
    @freeworld88888 13 дней назад +42

    chinese EV is not what she says here. chinese Ev is far better quality than America or Europe. chinese are luxury and super engineering, America is crazy now. they should ask the chinese to build factories or joint-venture in America.
    china is the top dog now for EV, solar panels, Ai etc.. others can't do it , it will cost more and they need to import components from china anyway.

    • @davidwong5197
      @davidwong5197 13 дней назад

      They banned the Ford joint venture with China.

    • @russell-gt1dy
      @russell-gt1dy 13 дней назад

      China can't even produce decent steel

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      That does it. I'm moving to China!

    • @archstanton5973
      @archstanton5973 8 дней назад

      There's a youtube site called "Inside China Business" and the person that hosts the site said a VERY interesting point: he pointed out that COMMERCIAL UAVs (drones) from China such as those of DJI and Autel are generations ahead of any other NON-Chinese commercial drones existing on the market - ESPECIALLY MURCAN! MADE ONES.....
      MURCA! GAVE Ukraine military drones for their war *but the MURCAN! MILITARY drones were SOOOOO inferior to the Chinese drones from DJI that Ukraine completely stopped using the MURCAN! military drones and went back to using only the Chinese DJI drones.*
      Thus the person said if COMMERCIAL drones from China are so far ahead of all other commercial drones *imagine how advanced the military drones are that China has.*

    • @davidwong5197
      @davidwong5197 8 дней назад

      @@archstanton5973 Pentagon uses DJI

  • @teoeehuat8742
    @teoeehuat8742 13 дней назад +38

    Two Bad Apples. Pity American, you got no choice, just take it.😂

    • @russell-gt1dy
      @russell-gt1dy 13 дней назад +2

      Go back to sleep

    • @teoeehuat8742
      @teoeehuat8742 13 дней назад +3

      @@russell-gt1dy Yah. we have a SWEET DREAM.

    • @user-qm8sc1jr9u
      @user-qm8sc1jr9u 13 дней назад +1

      better winnie the xi dictator

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      Now would be a good time for a dark horse candidate to appear

  • @jacintochua6885
    @jacintochua6885 13 дней назад +9

    These products are needed in US.

  • @gumonmyshu
    @gumonmyshu 13 дней назад +46

    If EV's were more affordable I would hands down buy one or two for local commuting. $15K-$25k.

    • @maynotbe
      @maynotbe 13 дней назад

      we bought 2 used bolt evs over 6 years ago, only tire rotations, less than 50¢/gallon equivalent. our neighborhood of roughly 200 houses, we're still the only ones with EVs after almost 7 years. people are too lazy to learn to use evs, it's easier to just Hate on EVs...& complain about high cost. no wonder China is winning

    • @maynotbe
      @maynotbe 13 дней назад

      used bolt ev or euv is easily under 25k

    • @TheOrangePatriot
      @TheOrangePatriot 13 дней назад +4

      @@maynotbe no one wants a used car

    • @maynotbe
      @maynotbe 13 дней назад +1

      ​@@TheOrangePatriotyou just proved my point about people, good luck, you're going to need it.

    • @workingman-xl6xh
      @workingman-xl6xh 13 дней назад +3

      There are no charging places in my area so the car would rot in the driveway.

  • @alinthemind
    @alinthemind 13 дней назад +24

    Should China impose 100% tariffs on Tesla vehicles in response to substantial subsidies and favorable loans provided by the U.S. government?

    • @davidwong5197
      @davidwong5197 13 дней назад +3

      No they won't. They would just restrict mineral export

    • @enzhus
      @enzhus 13 дней назад +9

      Tesla is also made in China 😂

    • @gfan003
      @gfan003 13 дней назад

      Tesla's share will be down again after Biden's tax hike, after all that lots of Tesla cars are made in China, but since China just passed legislation to allow Tesla automated cars on road that Tesla should survive. JP Morgan just double down on it's investment in China and is leaving US. Look at all the other big Corps and hedge funds are all investing big money in China right now, wonders why?😅

    • @fairfeatherfiend
      @fairfeatherfiend 13 дней назад +8

      Maybe Apple, wait, they're made in China too.

    • @russell-gt1dy
      @russell-gt1dy 13 дней назад

      China has a 25% import tax on everything. Which is why businesses moved factories there. To access that market and bypass the tariff.
      And now you know why we need tariffs

  • @anuragsinha2013
    @anuragsinha2013 13 дней назад +21

    Post World War 2,
    We are living in the Era of The American Empire,
    We are also living in the Era of Neo Colonialism(indirect control),
    We are also living in the era of Weasel politicians, who would bow down to anyone with money.
    And America is the queen of indirect control.
    Once Neo Colonialism collapses Democracies will thrive.
    Basically, after the second world war America has been running from third base to fourth base and calling themselves winner of the "world series".
    The era of China has begun, though the era of America is not completly lost.
    China is strong but not that strong.
    America is weak but not that weak.
    So, in this contest America will try to use G7 countries China will try to use Brics+ (Iran and Saudi Arabia).
    That tells you the era of a multi polar world is upon us.
    Whoever controls the middle east controls the world, The Europeans once controlled the middle east so they ruled the world, now America controls the middle east so it controls the world, if the indications are true tomorrow China is going to control the world and global economy because they have forged a relationship with Middle East.
    They are the going to be the defacto epicenter of the global economy and trade in the coming years.
    Where America has reached in 240 years, China has reached there in 40 years.
    Take that American Capitalism!
    The name of the game is Capitalism.
    "Who knew China (Communist party of China) is going to be so good at it?"
    China is winning because USA has allowed it to win, which is the biggest foreign policy blunder in the last 40 years. Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is just a euphemism for Authorotarian capitalism.
    China owes "it's whole success" to a series of poor foreign policy decision by America (The West) which is to involve China in WTO and shifted evey job from Detroit to Shanghai, Apparently the wonders of capitalism was supposed to make China more "democratic" nither did that happen nor did it drive a wedge between Soviet Russia and China. It has created a more powerful China and Russia alliance. Which is extremely hard to counter for the west.
    By 2030-32 China is going to become the largest economy in world which is going to be a massive change in the world and if it's goes really bad for US and it collapses (40 years after the Soviet Empire collapsed) then we might be ushered into a new era.
    There is nothing as soft power, there is hard power and everything flows from there.
    That's true for American Empire, Russia, China and the British Empire.
    In America the political parties change but the policies don't change,
    In China the political party don't change but the policies change all the time. Till America doesn't change course it is in for a rough ride for the next couple of decades.

    • @eliaschris2154
      @eliaschris2154 13 дней назад

      I agree for the most part. But why do you disregard soft power ?
      It is a major component of foreign policy. When millions or billions of people in different countries are imbued with the dominant culture of one particular actor it is only logical that certain sympathies will arise in favor of you at crucial junctures.

    • @anuragsinha2013
      @anuragsinha2013 13 дней назад +11

      @@eliaschris2154 Britain has "soft power" it is also just a global lieutenant of America, the job of the British Army is to protect British borders instead they guard oil fields in Iraq for American intrests.

    • @orionmedivh5859
      @orionmedivh5859 13 дней назад +2

      I also agree with most of it but don't think China's success is solely because of the bad policy of the US. If any country can be successful in this way, why India, which has similar size and population, has much better relationship with the west, is also a democracy, joined WTO earlier, didn't become as successful as China today?
      As you said already you think Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is just Authoritarian Capitalism, I won't argue because socialism can have many forms and there's no absolute definition of it. But my question is, does it mean Authoritarian Capitalism is better than "free market" neoliberal Capitalism? Was America's decline all Reagen's fault?

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      I bring good news then. There isn't going to be a 2029.

    • @anuragsinha2013
      @anuragsinha2013 13 дней назад

      @@blazeorangeandcamo the good news might come in 2027

  • @gfan003
    @gfan003 13 дней назад +11

    US failed at properly organize its capabilities and depended on Chinese made cheap products for too long, so now reality come biting as no matter how hard US trying to put back its manufacturing abilities it can not beat China. US military continued buying drones from dji and robot dogs made in China even after all these products became part of the ban list because when US companies trying to make copy would've cost ten times more. This all due to USD, as USD has been the major trade currency that US always gets the advantage in trade, that is why Americans were able to enjoy the cheap prices of all the high tech products but at the same time the trade deficit getting larger by the day, now everything is about to snowball down the hill that US government can only delay the imminent collapse of the USD and its' banking system.

    • @orionmedivh5859
      @orionmedivh5859 13 дней назад +2

      This is exactly the root cause, if you let your currency to be global currency you lose manufacturing power. Triffin Delimma.

  • @chongsewaun930
    @chongsewaun930 13 дней назад +6

    In so far as Sleepy Joe and Loud Mouth Trump are concerned, it does not make any different.

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      I see Joe as a slow burn and Trump as an accelerant. The quicker we can reset the better. Trump 2024.

  • @ryansreaction
    @ryansreaction 14 дней назад +30

    Trump is gonna wreck Biden in these debates 😂
    “Joe kept my border policies”
    “Joe kept my Chinese tariffs”
    “Roe v Wade was dismantled under Joes term”
    “the economy is bad under Biden”

    • @airtale8725
      @airtale8725 13 дней назад +2

      Except these are different tariffs, the border bill was downvoted by Republicans, and the economy is actually good. Well, it's not like he was bothered by facts at any time.

    • @salvadorvelasquez4109
      @salvadorvelasquez4109 13 дней назад +10

      ​@@airtale8725that wasn't a U.S. border bill. It was a Ukrainian border bill.

    • @ryansreaction
      @ryansreaction 13 дней назад +10

      @@airtale8725 - 😂 imagine just repeating what you’re told. “The economy is good” 😂💀

    • @ab8588
      @ab8588 13 дней назад +1

      @@ryansreactionin Texas it’s local taxes what’s pushing up inflation here.

    • @tracybarhite1764
      @tracybarhite1764 13 дней назад

      LOL Biden didn't keep Trump's border policies.

  • @badimpulses17
    @badimpulses17 13 дней назад +8

    Dumb and Dumber take your pick. 😂

  • @looots1320
    @looots1320 13 дней назад +7

    When the other basketball team scores too good you put a minus 10 points before the game starts 🤣

  • @hermesliteratus882
    @hermesliteratus882 13 дней назад +3

    Joe: I am going to place 100% tariffs on your EVs, solar panels and batteries and I don't think you would want to impose retaliatory tax on American products.
    China: Are you out of your mind?

  • @wenfulin
    @wenfulin 13 дней назад +3

    Chinese is united by their government to fight for their future together.
    American is divided by two parties and still not figured out a long-term strategy to deal with China.
    What political system is better off from this perspective?

  • @user-qo1fm8iu3c
    @user-qo1fm8iu3c 13 дней назад +3

    Paying 3x times more for American made pos evs? FK no.

  • @gwenwalravens8030
    @gwenwalravens8030 13 дней назад +2

    Putting tariffs on goods that aren't made in the US only makes life more expensive. What is a tariff on semi-conducters going to acchieve? Nothing. More money going to the government.

  • @jameszhou162
    @jameszhou162 13 дней назад +3

    The dominant position China has on EV is almost unparalleled. Therefore, any EVs from any developing countries which can be sold in North America are probably using 70% of Chinese components

  • @melindamaxwell7923
    @melindamaxwell7923 14 дней назад +22

    Neither of them are a good choice. Both are horrible ambassadors of our country.

    • @MindfulAttraction2.0
      @MindfulAttraction2.0 14 дней назад +2

      Yeah, but Trump didn't get us until three or four wars in less than 3 years. So I'll go with that.

    • @WeAreItt
      @WeAreItt 13 дней назад +4

      @@MindfulAttraction2.0
      And yet he tried to start 3 and escalated every single war he inherited
      Trumps not anti war

    • @spankyssurprise1361
      @spankyssurprise1361 13 дней назад

      ​@@WeAreIttTried to start 3? Care to elaborate?

    • @WeAreItt
      @WeAreItt 13 дней назад

      @@spankyssurprise1361
      War with Iran
      War with North Korea
      War with China
      Yeah he tried to start them
      Maybe a little less Fox News huh
      Little less cnn also

    • @user-xh3eg2tf2y
      @user-xh3eg2tf2y 13 дней назад

      that's mean fundamental your political system have problems. you think you can afford this kind of system. someone perform incompetent, we can wait the next one.

  • @kevinoreilly6833
    @kevinoreilly6833 13 дней назад +5

    Wow! Bre got this one right! Government meddling makes the economy less efficient increasing scarcity and prices to the consumer. This principle should be applied to all other economic arguments at the Hill.

  • @philipwong895
    @philipwong895 13 дней назад +2

    When the US buyer imports goods subject to tariffs from China, they pay the tariff to the US government. This cost and any markup are typically passed on to the end consumer, meaning consumers ultimately bear the burden of tariffs through higher prices. The Chinese seller, however, does not directly pay the tariff; the importer in the US bears that responsibility.
    China does not suffer the consequences of tariffs. The US consumers are being punished by having to pay higher prices.
    In 2012, President Obama, as part of his plan to double the U.S. share of the world's solar panels from 5% to 10%, imposed tariffs of up to 249% on solar imports from China. In response, China retaliated by imposing import restrictions on polysilicon from the U.S. At the time, the U.S. held a 50% share of the global polysilicon market, which has since dropped to under 4%. The U.S. share of the world's solar panels has dropped to under 2%. China has promised to retaliate as strongly in response to new tariffs.

  • @ritmo2k
    @ritmo2k 13 дней назад +5

    60 seconds in I can't wait to hear Bri's intelligent take on this.

  • @jeffreywang8506
    @jeffreywang8506 13 дней назад +10

    one is dumber than another!😂😂

    • @Ravi50237
      @Ravi50237 13 дней назад

      Trump tariffs are a little different
      Tariffs are good if they’re serving the people, Bidens tariffs are to benefit the rich

    • @zacksmith5644
      @zacksmith5644 12 дней назад

      ​@@Ravi50237In 2012, President Obama, as part of his plan to
      double the U.S. share of the world's solar panels
      from 5% to 10%, imposed tariffs of up to 249% on
      solar imports from China. In response, China
      retaliated by imposing import restrictions on
      polysilicon from the U.S. At the time, the U.S.
      held a 50% share of the global polysilicon market,
      which has since dropped to under 4%. The U.S.
      share of the world's solar panels has dropped to
      under 2%. China has promised to retaliate as
      strongly in response to new tariffs.

  • @stevelarsen3671
    @stevelarsen3671 14 дней назад +18

    Just doing it to not look weak, too little too late.

    • @airtale8725
      @airtale8725 13 дней назад +1

      Actually he had passed multiple sanctions and tariff against China already, and this tariff needed time to pass because he waited for the EU to join.

    • @flintfuentes7652
      @flintfuentes7652 13 дней назад

      @@airtale8725 more likely than not, biden is maintaining and following up on trump's initial tariffs on china. the initial move takes bigger balls.

  • @lingth
    @lingth 13 дней назад +4

    Just get a American EV maker to make a $15,000 entry EV.. subsidy it or whatever

    • @user-fq5vl3fl1b
      @user-fq5vl3fl1b 13 дней назад +1

      The US government is subsidizing US EVs: about $7,500 from federal and several thousands from state.

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад +1

      That'll be the day

  • @johnwayne8475
    @johnwayne8475 13 дней назад +2

    If you really want America to be world leaders in these industries, surely "protecting them" by shielding them from the best in the world is not the way to achieve this. It's like saying I want my kids to be world leaders, but I'm not letting them out of the neighborhood because I need to protect them.

  • @jacintochua6885
    @jacintochua6885 13 дней назад +3

    Protectionism at work.

  • @LuckyJojo-yb9vt
    @LuckyJojo-yb9vt 13 дней назад +2

    Neither Trump nor Biden specific that ultimately that consumers will be paying the bills and price increase.

  • @vikingraider712
    @vikingraider712 13 дней назад +5

    Of course he only puts sanctions on things that hurt consumers like not allowing people to buy cheaper evs not like I’d buy one tho

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      Wait until the second act where he bans fossil fuel vehicles outright

  • @freespirit4162
    @freespirit4162 13 дней назад +2

    5 Chinese nationals were on board MH370 to register semiconductor patent which was eventually registered by only American partner Left.

  • @emmeadowmitbbs3537
    @emmeadowmitbbs3537 13 дней назад +9

    My take is a little different. There must be reasons that forced the presidents to make the same decision. In other words, these policies are largely inevitable, irrespective of democrat presidency or republican presidency. But these policies do look desperate and therefore they won't be able to change the outcome.

  • @duckling9854
    @duckling9854 13 дней назад +1

    How can you blame someone who doesn’t even know where he is.

  • @mephisto2812
    @mephisto2812 13 дней назад +8

    If converted to $ China EV from BYD should be around 9k and you can also apply for a monthly payment which is really affordable and could help struggling individual to cut some expenses. they also comes with a charger that you can plug anywhere and an emergency small generator that you can put some gas in to charge the car for emergency.

    • @davidwong5197
      @davidwong5197 13 дней назад +3

      Pelosi' s refrigerator is more expensive than that. LOL

  • @kelvinzhang2108
    @kelvinzhang2108 13 дней назад +5

    what most americans don't get is, the entire supply chain in China for EV is not replaceable, there's literally entire city with manufacturer plants to make every part that goes into it. no logistics, no price gauging because everything is made inhouse. you can try to move just the car manufacturing part of the EV, but you still will have reply on outsourcing to precure parts.

  • @audreyroche9490
    @audreyroche9490 13 дней назад +5

    China got best technology in world usa nust jealous it be there loss

  • @CountryWilde
    @CountryWilde 13 дней назад +5

    Seems to me our global trade policies create a "race to the bottom" for workers' health, labor standards, and how much environmental damage is tolerated in manufacturing. The Structural
    Adjustment Programs (SAPS) of the IMF and World Bank force debtor nations into this - all so those of us who live in affluent nations can enjoy lower prices on products. Will any of our leaders address this?

  • @CoyotePark
    @CoyotePark 13 дней назад +1

    So they want greener and cheaper cars or not?? I don't understand :D

  • @kkhalifah1019
    @kkhalifah1019 8 дней назад

    The problem starts when you assume this 100% tariff shenanigan is based on economics. It isn't. It's based on the geopolitical hysteria and hubris of an empire in decline. That's why it fails to make any economic sense and US consumers will have to pay for it as a result.

  • @tubes4ever570
    @tubes4ever570 13 дней назад +1

    Who the heck is PREISDENT Biden???

  • @gwenwalravens8030
    @gwenwalravens8030 13 дней назад

    American companies choose to open factories in China and not elsewhere. Not only is the labour cheap, they are skilled and work efficiently. Do they have workers' rights? Those are the issues.

    • @crowrequiem3934
      @crowrequiem3934 11 дней назад

      Auto makers are the first to adapt lights-off factories, the industry is highly automated

  • @JohnChildressURock
    @JohnChildressURock 13 дней назад

    What so sad about all of this electrician? Is it still not gonna save us any money. If you get an electric car, they charge you more for your car tax. If you get solar panels in California, they text you on those. They don’t tell you about that part they just bring it on you after you own the items.

  • @Issavibe3
    @Issavibe3 11 дней назад

    If BYD was approved in North America, Tesla would run out of business pretty fast . They’re more luxurious, better built at around the same price

  • @sinsun9166
    @sinsun9166 13 дней назад +1

    Just raise the tax for gas car.

  • @ZephyrPhotography
    @ZephyrPhotography 13 дней назад +2

    if he doesnt do that the american economy will collapse, first auto then real estate then bank

    • @hanwong7623
      @hanwong7623 12 дней назад

      If we had top notch tech and manufacturing it wouldnt! But we don't 😩, so we punish ourselves.

  • @RoughNeck777
    @RoughNeck777 13 дней назад +5

    I really don't understand the logic here. Why our government wants us to pay more for EV? We need more affordable EVs. I paid 50K for my VW ID4 and totally not happy with it. It feels more like a 25K EV at most.

    • @jace1113
      @jace1113 13 дней назад

      There is no logic. China is an easy target and it is election season.

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      It's not about consumers, it never has been

  • @patrickdayton2080
    @patrickdayton2080 13 дней назад +1

    If you don't know China you are economy,it is now time wake and stop complaining and channel your own paths

  • @mls3315
    @mls3315 11 дней назад

    The Sun glasses looked like they were shopped on him.

  • @randymckellar5879
    @randymckellar5879 8 дней назад

    I think Briahna is spot-on on this one - US Automakers need to offer VERY affordable, minimum frills, compact, entry-level EVs targeted at young adults who would use it primarily for errands and commuting. How many high-mileage, overnight trips does the average high-school driver through young adult take? (And, in a public/private partnership, create practical electrical infrastructure solutions that support that market/demographics - such as low-cost college and apartment charging stations.)

  • @vidsurf88
    @vidsurf88 10 дней назад

    Eating our lunch? lol ... wake up.
    Your lunch went to the military industrial complex

  • @patrickdayton2080
    @patrickdayton2080 13 дней назад +1

    It actually doesn't not make sense for the American to be buy care from outside when you can build your own everything

  • @meegz149
    @meegz149 9 дней назад

    We are a pox on this planet.

  • @benhur933
    @benhur933 13 дней назад

    Brie doesn't understand that the average gas car currently runs around 25k at a minimum, a luxury car electric car costs 30k?

  • @kcchong5661
    @kcchong5661 13 дней назад

    Prices of comparable Chinese EVs is much more less than that of EVs made by US. So even with a 100% tariff, the Chinese EVs would be very affordable by US standard. But alas, the US prohibits with rules the import of Chinese EVs.Thus the 100% tariff is a false "election" move, when only a few THOUSAND Chinese EVs have been allowed to be imported so far.

  • @laucheesing2109
    @laucheesing2109 13 дней назад +4

    Biden and triump same biden is better to increse 200% tarrif😂😂😂😂😂

  • @ignatiuschua5268
    @ignatiuschua5268 13 дней назад +1

    The rest of the world will enjoy the cheap and good product from China. USA can get it alot more expensive but they have to pay to their government for the excess through tariff. Of course the USA government won't mind as the money still stays in US and in the government who is running a huge deficit.

    • @freespirit4162
      @freespirit4162 13 дней назад

      If only profits stayed in America for its Populations Benefits

  • @stresseddude
    @stresseddude 12 дней назад

    America is not uncompetitive. China is known to take from competition. But the issue with politics is that bias is easily driven by the fallacies of cognitive bias, which leads to foolishness

  • @billgiese3631
    @billgiese3631 14 дней назад +7

    Unless the cost of the product is affordable, no one will buy it. No matter where it is made. We the people do not have the option of deficient finances like our government has been operating in for many decades at our expense.

    • @blazeorangeandcamo
      @blazeorangeandcamo 13 дней назад

      I'll show them my new trick. It's called defaulting on my debt

  • @jinsoonchin5205
    @jinsoonchin5205 13 дней назад +1

    both are hypocritical

  • @smr5151
    @smr5151 12 дней назад

    People don't want electric in general.

    • @hanwong7623
      @hanwong7623 12 дней назад

      Cause we spend our tax dollars on frivilous things (coups, other people's wars, military and pocket lining) while China spends it on their people. Infrastructure, education and etc. without the infrastructure, EVs will not be feasible.

  • @darthvadeth6290
    @darthvadeth6290 9 дней назад

    Why shoud I care about a country that doesnt care about me? 😂

  • @jeremyholbrook2094
    @jeremyholbrook2094 13 дней назад

    I think this totally misses the mark. With more jobs comes higher incomes. Higher incomes equals more luxury items. So, the affordability will not be as big of a problem with higher income. What we're actually seeing is they're trying to push and throw away economy for evs. That's extremely counterproductive. We should be reinforcing a repair economy. This is great for a small business and creates a climate for growth as well as reducing carbon from manufacturing.

  • @alexleanh
    @alexleanh 11 дней назад

    In any economic war, tariffs is the last resort (besides blockade). The implementation of tariffs clearly shows the losing war and the last desperation act. Tariffs never work because it's a lose-lose proposition for both sides. If anything at all, this is a clear sign of the US is no longer a superpower (especially on the global economic front) and the empire is in decline (some even say "the empire is crumbling before of our eyes").

  • @martinchristianaguilar5135
    @martinchristianaguilar5135 13 дней назад +1

    🇺🇸 Thinks 🇨🇳 Is 🇯🇵

  • @Black_Sun_Dark_Star
    @Black_Sun_Dark_Star 13 дней назад +6

    Careful! Don't eat a fortune cookie! It might entire your body and steal your soul. National security....

    • @thomaskim3128
      @thomaskim3128 13 дней назад

      Fortune cookies were invented in America. It’s ok to eat fortune cookies it’s not a national security issue.

    • @Black_Sun_Dark_Star
      @Black_Sun_Dark_Star 13 дней назад

      @@thomaskim3128 might include nanobots in the ingredient. After all they are made by Chinese migrants

  • @user-xm1xb2uo4v
    @user-xm1xb2uo4v 13 дней назад

    This is oxymoron. What is the point of importing cheaper Chinese products when you lost your jobs and your income. You have no money to buy.

  • @workingman-xl6xh
    @workingman-xl6xh 13 дней назад +1

    We need to tell Biden where to put his EV mandate!

  • @bkh8528
    @bkh8528 14 дней назад +11

    Election time……… and time for Joe’s followers to forget what this administration has done prior………..

  • @DannyLe808
    @DannyLe808 11 дней назад

    Both of these old men gotta go and leave the office to younger men who capable of taking care of our country.
    Tariffs are to exploit average American people to pay more for shoddy American products like EV and cars in general. Competition make company compete for better product at lower price.

  • @wulung5943
    @wulung5943 13 дней назад +3

    Idiocy 🤣

  • @laurabone3228
    @laurabone3228 13 дней назад

    I'm in the EV industry. It's likely that even with Tariffs, these Chinese vehicles will still be more affordable than an American vehicle, even with subsidies. We were building EV's in California long before Detroit finally couldn't hold off anymore if they wanted to stay in business. I think these tariffs are to please Detroit, who doesn't want to manufacture EV's and doesn't want the competition from China. I don't like China dominating the EV market in the US. But also don't approve of Biden messing with the EV market w/tariffs. At this point Chinese EV market is far more developed than US. They learned from us while we handed them the market over a decade ago. China is on their 4th generation or so models, and they're quite good. We could be driving affordable American EV's by now. Detroit waited about ten years too long laughing at Tesla and sitting on their laurels...until they no longer could. To make EV's affordable to the average person, we need different models of leasing or subscription services. People need access to EV's, not necessarily ownership of something that spends most of its time parked. It's time to stop with so much high tech and luxury in the build in favor of simplicity, quality, and affordability. It certainly can be done. Detroit doesn't want to.

  • @jenniferfisher7455
    @jenniferfisher7455 13 дней назад +1

    I thought china has car manufacturing in Mexico?

  • @chinmungkuan8551
    @chinmungkuan8551 12 дней назад

    40 years ago they have same problems with japorn and today japorn become a lapdog successfully but not to china . Never compare human to babarian

  • @stevencher9968
    @stevencher9968 13 дней назад

    US has degenerated to the level of India's protectionism. Ford,GM, German, japanese and Korean cars dominated the world market for almost 10 decades and it's ok but not ok for Chinese cars. Can it be more obvious what is behind all these ?

  • @joshuabates7424
    @joshuabates7424 10 дней назад

    This is about green tech, it is a totally different thing!

  • @redr6guy
    @redr6guy 13 дней назад

    Bri doesn't seem to understand economics. American car manufacturers haven't been incentivized to make luxury EVs by the government. American car manufacturers make what sells. Right now, the only people that are buying EVs are people that also buy luxury vehicles. If people were buying cheap EVs, American car manufacturers would make them. There just isn't a good EV environment in the US right now.

  • @yumyumgimmesum
    @yumyumgimmesum 13 дней назад +3

    “ China’s eating our lunch. “ The U.S. over consumes and has been eating 5 lunches.

  • @jackjrabbit
    @jackjrabbit 13 дней назад

    Can't wait for the inflation.

  • @Rubicon365
    @Rubicon365 11 дней назад

    What is the point of a democracy when you can only vote for dumb or dumber?

  • @rainwaterjoseph4634
    @rainwaterjoseph4634 7 дней назад

    When President Trump did this, the media called him racist and xenophobic. But somehow, biden is a strong leader for doing it.

  • @martystamey69
    @martystamey69 6 дней назад

    Thats scary!!!He couldn't take on a 1st grader

  • @crowrequiem3934
    @crowrequiem3934 11 дней назад

    Chinese car makers (ev, hybrid and ice) have to compete with almost every big foreign brand in one of the largest market for cars. those who survive are those who can.
    Most foreign brands are far too comfortable with their global sales.
    Adding to that electric bills are way cheaper than gas, and charging stations are everywhere in cities(in countryside you can just charge at your house)

  • @ganzhishijie
    @ganzhishijie 11 дней назад

    十几年前喊着中国要环保低碳减排的人是谁?