Who came up with this? To be able to predict the behavior of electrons in the various fields and cavities is beyond imagination. My father was a radar engineer, dating back to WWII when was a young man. He had surplus radar equipment in the garage (much to my mother's dismay!). He never explained how the whole thing worked, but I doubt I could have understood much anyway. All my life, he worked for Douglas Aircraft. Sometimes he worked on airplanes, sometimes on missles and spacecraft. Much of what he did while working for Douglas Aircraft was classified, so I never really understood what he did exactly. He would not have been able to discuss it. During the war, our superior radar equipment was a key factor in giving the allies an edge. Mind blowing stuff..
There were many experiences regarding electron cannon and magnetic field oscillators that were kept in sectret. For a while. You can imagine these tests as they try to predic the move of the e- based on magnetism as a ball would move in a liquid tank moved by a magnetic force. They were semi right.
Whats disturbing is this ancient video is perhaps the best video explanation of a magentron's operational theory. Tube technology was intertwined with the development of the magetron and tube knowledge is nearly dead. No modern EE student with CMOS understanding could begin to contrive the concept of the magnetron as an oscilator and there is no equivalent high powered oscillator exists within CMOS tech. Its sad that the geniuses that understood and contrived this never had the opportunity to apply this same tech given modern advances.
high-power radars are awesome, but they have a great problem, the source can be easily detected, a high value target in a war. So, the newer radars use less power comparatively but with more sensitive recievers, this combination makes it harder to detect the radar's location and use less power.
@@NaderNabilart Radar targeting ordinance always struck me as something counter-able by spamming decoy radar devices. Trying to be quiet, while an improvement, seems like a losing battle. Granted, i've never designed missiles & radar so I'm probably missing somethings.
@@gerrieklijzing3198 But quantum computing and microwaves allow matter to be selected and penetrated to identify the atoms, freeze the matter, and photocopy it and then duplicate it somewhere else. this is possible today, but this is dangerius and not controled...
In space, if gravity is controlled, are human reactions also controlled? That is, can a satellite attack you if gravity did not exist in the exosphere?
@@gerrieklijzing3198 What you say is very strange because if a universal satellite allows gravity in space, it would first have to ask permission to use transportation and human reactions, it would also have to have radar requirements, medical problems that may arise, social solutions, standards. medical standards, climate standards, land use standards, magnetic standards, etc...
@@gerrieklijzing3198 but also that there is a different relationship between space and gravity because gravity is a force and space is a dimension.........
Наука
I tend to find that the older the technological information, the more authentic the information of the technology is.
Who came up with this? To be able to predict the behavior of electrons in the various fields and cavities is beyond imagination. My father was a radar engineer, dating back to WWII when was a young man. He had surplus radar equipment in the garage (much to my mother's dismay!). He never explained how the whole thing worked, but I doubt I could have understood much anyway. All my life, he worked for Douglas Aircraft. Sometimes he worked on airplanes, sometimes on missles and spacecraft. Much of what he did while working for Douglas Aircraft was classified, so I never really understood what he did exactly. He would not have been able to discuss it. During the war, our superior radar equipment was a key factor in giving the allies an edge. Mind blowing stuff..
What you said made no sense, I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul. :P
Indeed...its alien tech. To put simply modern science doesn't even have clarity on what an electron is.
There were many experiences regarding electron cannon and magnetic field oscillators that were kept in sectret. For a while.
You can imagine these tests as they try to predic the move of the e- based on magnetism as a ball would move in a liquid tank moved by a magnetic force.
They were semi right.
Very good explanation of klystrons. Much better than wikipedia.
Never trust Wikipedia
AMAZING, THANKS FOR SHARING!!!
Fascinating.
Whats disturbing is this ancient video is perhaps the best video explanation of a magentron's operational theory. Tube technology was intertwined with the development of the magetron and tube knowledge is nearly dead. No modern EE student with CMOS understanding could begin to contrive the concept of the magnetron as an oscilator and there is no equivalent high powered oscillator exists within CMOS tech. Its sad that the geniuses that understood and contrived this never had the opportunity to apply this same tech given modern advances.
high-power radars are awesome, but they have a great problem, the source can be easily detected, a high value target in a war. So, the newer radars use less power comparatively but with more sensitive recievers, this combination makes it harder to detect the radar's location and use less power.
@@NaderNabilart Radar targeting ordinance always struck me as something counter-able by spamming decoy radar devices. Trying to be quiet, while an improvement, seems like a losing battle. Granted, i've never designed missiles & radar so I'm probably missing somethings.
A surprisingly informative video.
The klystron and spark gap are part of the receiver circuit, and the magnatron and pulse transformer are part of the transmitter.
Such a fascinating is phenomena.
Very interesting. The high power cavity magnetron is, of course, a British invention.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavity_magnetron
Wow! 500 kw. From where did they gethat power?Amazing device created by man.
It's pulsed
Are there artificial satellites with electromagnetic transport?
There are no satellites at all.
@@gerrieklijzing3198 But quantum computing and microwaves allow matter to be selected and penetrated to identify the atoms, freeze the matter, and photocopy it and then duplicate it somewhere else. this is possible today, but this is dangerius and not controled...
In space, if gravity is controlled, are human reactions also controlled? That is, can a satellite attack you if gravity did not exist in the exosphere?
There is no space, also no gravity.
@@gerrieklijzing3198 What you say is very strange because if a universal satellite allows gravity in space, it would first have to ask permission to use transportation and human reactions, it would also have to have radar requirements, medical problems that may arise, social solutions, standards. medical standards, climate standards, land use standards, magnetic standards, etc...
@@franciscoibanez2717 I don't understand what you are saying, assuredly I say to you, satellites do not exist because there is no space.
@@gerrieklijzing3198 but also that there is a different relationship between space and gravity because gravity is a force and space is a dimension.........
annoying logo spinning around