Johnny Depp Lawyer Ben Chew Discusses Alex Jones Defamation Trial

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 сен 2022
  • Johnny Depp's lawyer Ben Chew appeared Tuesday on the Law&Crime Network to discuss the Alex Jones defamation trial.
    #JohnnyDepp #AlexJones #LawAndCrime
    STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
    Watch Law&Crime Network on RUclipsTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
    Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
    Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
    Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
    LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
    Instagram: / lawandcrime
    Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
    Facebook: / lawandcrime
    Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
    TikTok: / lawandcrime
    LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
    SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK RUclips CHANNELS:
    Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
    Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
    Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
    Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 372

  • @csea4672
    @csea4672 Год назад +16

    I love that Ben has a picture of him and Johnny hugging in the background ❤ such a sweet man!

  • @codyb.3015
    @codyb.3015 Год назад +23

    26:30 is when Chew speaks

  • @audralynn7454
    @audralynn7454 Год назад +32

    Welcome Ben Chew!! Very happy to see you here on Law & Crime Network!! Looking forward to more analysis from you!!

  • @Karamia68
    @Karamia68 Год назад +16

    I would have liked to hear what Ben Chew and Ann thought about Alex talking about the judge outside of the courthouse.

  • @helenn7577
    @helenn7577 Год назад +17

    I agree with Ben Chew the jury and televised court cases is a must and the jury are so much more trustworthy than one judges opinion. Great lawyer

    • @AnotherDimension01
      @AnotherDimension01 Год назад +1

      That one judge's opinion was to default this case, the judge demanded endless discovery which is not the way law works. Discovery has to be your evidence or you are just fishing for evidence.

    • @TheIMP2010
      @TheIMP2010 Год назад +1

      @@AnotherDimension01, one judge didn't decide to default in all 4 of Jones' lawsuits.
      Jones did that by not fully complying with discovery, for instance, the Google Analytics data that we KNOW they used and refused to share. Because of this, we can infer that he believes defaulting on all of these torts would be better for him both financially and criminally speaking than complying and attempting to defend himself in trial.

    • @AnotherDimension01
      @AnotherDimension01 Год назад

      @@TheIMP2010 this is the 2nd case with 2 more to come, so far both defaulted. Like I said earlier discovery is your evidence. Discovery is not there for you to use to look for your evidence.

  • @Aterhallsam
    @Aterhallsam Год назад +22

    It’s so misleading saying Alex was ordered to pay 50 million. No mainstream media mentions that there is a max limit to punitive damages in Texas, so he’ll only have to pay a little over 5,6 million. I’m not defending Alex, I just don’t like when they leave out key information to make it sound more sensational.

    • @NLC519
      @NLC519 Год назад +2

      Of course it's all fake. All of it

    • @mrtambourineman6107
      @mrtambourineman6107 Год назад +3

      Not that fake though is it, that is what a court of law ordered him to pay. The fact he won't pay it all has also been widely reported too when I've been watching. He did get a 50 million dollar message from Texas though buddy

    • @TheIMP2010
      @TheIMP2010 Год назад +2

      He very much was found liable for $50,000,000 worth of damages.
      And literally all of them have mentioned the punitive damages cap. The intent is to use this case to argue that they're unconstitutional (TX Supreme Court) and antiquated by today's standards. As a note, damages caps were only instituted after lobbying by heinously negligent corporations who didn't want to actually be held accountable for the cost in human lives, suffering, and property.

    • @NLC519
      @NLC519 Год назад

      @@TheIMP2010 literally! Literally! It's always "literally" with the libs. They think people will take them more serious when they add the word "LITERALLY." in reality it is completely overusedand makes libs sound like whiny prepubscent spoiled brats.

  • @patti6178
    @patti6178 Год назад +21

    this witness testimony was so fascinating. I could listen to this person share their knowledge for hours (more than the hours I've already watched from this case). My grandmother used to tell me stories of what propaganda was used to influence people in world war 2. It is very interesting to see these same manipulation strategies my grandmother explained explained again by a professional that was not even alive back then.

    • @gregss3963
      @gregss3963 Год назад +5

      Yes he was describing what ABC,NBC,CBS,FOX,CNN and talk radio has been doing for years

    • @juliecrane9647
      @juliecrane9647 Год назад +2

      @@gregss3963 Then don't listen. It's that simple Greg. Change the channel. Read a book....if you can read. Doubt you can.

    • @gregss3963
      @gregss3963 Год назад

      @@juliecrane9647 yes I stopped years ago. People are living an illusion of reality based on lies from the media. A Saint once said ..."Thier will be a time when everyone will be CONTROLLED by the devil through a little box" .(TV-RADIO-COMPUTOR-Cell PHONES). and this has been happening for the last 50 years

    • @rockyevans1584
      @rockyevans1584 Год назад

      @@juliecrane9647 you're weirdly defensive Julie, what upsets you so?

  • @cassiechristian1147
    @cassiechristian1147 Год назад +12

    I love Ben! ❤ Much respect 🙏

  • @derpestarzt
    @derpestarzt Год назад +2

    This is the end of journalism, who's gonna risk their ability to make a living for questioning stories that don't add up? no one.

  • @ManOfLaw
    @ManOfLaw Год назад +2

    Popcorn: Grabbed
    Like button: Obliterated

  • @PERRYTHEPROPHET
    @PERRYTHEPROPHET Год назад +2

    The picture of Ben & Johnny in the background is really cool!

  • @PaulMelia
    @PaulMelia Год назад +8

    Whether you are for Alex Jones or against him that is one crazy statement @34.25 to say '' He's not the killer but in a lot of ways he is''. Wow

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +1

      Well... How would you call the one that arm the shooter and/or tell him who to shoot?

    • @PaulMelia
      @PaulMelia Год назад +6

      @@walterbo7687 Your saying Alex Jones armed the shooter? That is ridiculous

    • @AnyahEMB
      @AnyahEMB Год назад +2

      @@walterbo7687 Well it certainly was not Alex Jones.

  • @ZOIZENWRITER
    @ZOIZENWRITER Год назад +5

    love this JD lawyer

  • @Redthirteenjamie
    @Redthirteenjamie Год назад +3

    Wait. So they brought a guy into court to state the obvious about the Internet? 😂

  • @noproblemcha7240
    @noproblemcha7240 Год назад +1

    I Made A Cartoon Version Of Myself Called Blackpeerama SpaMink

  • @basketballdad4454
    @basketballdad4454 Год назад +16

    This lady said he’s Not the killer but in many ways is and needs to be treated as such. This is asinine.

    • @AnotherDimension01
      @AnotherDimension01 Год назад +1

      Ya real crazy talk!

    • @williamjackson2345
      @williamjackson2345 Год назад

      Do u even know who killed the kids if u want to say Alex is the killer? Do u have that same opinion when the New York Times lied about wmds in Iraq? Killing thousands of people??

    • @Woedy818
      @Woedy818 Год назад +2

      Also said had to block comments bc of infowars ppl lol!

    • @mrtambourineman6107
      @mrtambourineman6107 Год назад +4

      Jones is going down! Get over it 🙄

    • @AnotherDimension01
      @AnotherDimension01 Год назад +3

      @@mrtambourineman6107 your free thought is goin down. You must always believe official stories! Never express doubt.

  • @Truth1561
    @Truth1561 Год назад +4

    With Jones filing bankruptcy isn't this all a paper exercise? What sort of person wants to sit and listen to him rant in his raspy maniacal voice? He sets my nerves on edge!

  • @nbird4458
    @nbird4458 Год назад

    Ben Cheeeeew! bring him more often please !

  • @collettestephenson127
    @collettestephenson127 Год назад +1

    Love this channel! Xx

  • @valeriecalorie7115
    @valeriecalorie7115 Год назад +6

    Theres a teacher at my school who I think Is related to Rottonbottom. Her name is Mrs. Finn, and she's SOOOO rude. She said my mom was "Hostile" she said .... your being very hostile ma'am is this your daughter. (There were only 2 of us i the room so duh...)
    Edit: but she was super mean, and a bully. This just happened yesterday. There was way more, but I can't write it all.

    • @valeriecalorie7115
      @valeriecalorie7115 Год назад +1

      And she was overreacting. But her Son who used to be a girl, trans, was in my class last year, he was in grade 12 and I was in grade 10. It was a grade 10,11,12 split. So that's mabey why Miss, Finn is "hostile" herself because her son who used to be a daughter changed and she probably still never got over that.

  • @jamesharris184
    @jamesharris184 Год назад +3

    Where the rubber meets the road Mr Jones.

  • @theyetidude
    @theyetidude Год назад +2

    Hasn't shown any contrition? Jones has been apologizing since 2016. This dude does not know the case. But L&C has it out for Jones anyway, so what do you expect? What that woman said is inexcusable and preposterous.

  • @stagename1031
    @stagename1031 Год назад +9

    Really really liked Chew. Not going to hold this against him.

  • @QkjajshsjajaCcccc
    @QkjajshsjajaCcccc Год назад +9

    This is sad

  • @kungfuscubabape953
    @kungfuscubabape953 Год назад +1

    MR.CHEW!!!!@

  • @dianeleone1634
    @dianeleone1634 Год назад

    My dad was retired in mid 1970's, We were raising children, Dad bought a T.V. with CC, no longer blasted the house with high volume programs that he was interested in. Enter cable T.V., the O.J.Simpson trial, after the verdict, Dad no longer binge watched news pieces.. Those tabloid magazines with JonBenet covers lined the grocery store check out line.. Again tears.. Look 30 yrs later, we're sometimes captivated by pretend Hollyweird movie stars & blur the lines of real families. Where's our Guardian Angel🙏

  • @dfordiligence2398
    @dfordiligence2398 Год назад

    11:15 - The word you are looking for is "quaternary".

  • @Goldenman6288
    @Goldenman6288 Год назад +2

    Prediction: the jury will award approximately 66.8 million dollars. Give or take 1 million.

    • @livingfree7153
      @livingfree7153 Год назад

      The max is $5.6 million.

    • @mrtambourineman6107
      @mrtambourineman6107 Год назад +1

      @@livingfree7153 no it ain't! I think you're getting confused with the Texas court ruling maximum. It could be as high as $100 million here.

  • @nancyfahey7518
    @nancyfahey7518 Год назад

    Clint Watts needs to start a youtube channel.

  • @mrtambourineman6107
    @mrtambourineman6107 Год назад +2

    Jones is going down!!!

  • @josephthomas9177
    @josephthomas9177 Год назад

    The show trial continues.

  • @notenough1484
    @notenough1484 Год назад

    22:39...
    Two issues come forward at this point.
    The multi device plans
    And
    After skimming through some comments
    In this phase of the accountability,
    The jury sure does have to make it very clear, where the common factor is absolutely solidified.
    I’m now even more curious about the next half of the video.

    • @notenough1484
      @notenough1484 Год назад

      25:26 to that video shown, and the hurdle
      The influence of the publication of the subscription, is the money piece.The gun factor is getting in the way perhaps. 😓

  • @janiesolomon7575
    @janiesolomon7575 Год назад +1

    Close to the end we're talking about weapons that they're wanting to take them away if you listen to the news that's exactly what they've been saying

  • @tredd9019
    @tredd9019 Год назад

    So much for the ultimate responsibility for YOUR behavior being YOU.

  • @sundaefunday4778
    @sundaefunday4778 Год назад +3

    i dont like alex jones, but the plaintiffs and the judge are literally playing into his hands..... alex jones couldnt buy better publicity and on top of that they are giving him everything he needs to convince the majority of ppl that hes right. the default judgement is a good idea on paper, but now he can just say the trial was bogus.

  • @tomfrasiko4056
    @tomfrasiko4056 Год назад

    and dont tell me i need help or need to free my mind

    • @oxygen69able
      @oxygen69able Год назад +1

      You don't need help. You need Satan. The light bearer. Celebrate the wisdom of your human brothers and sisters.

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +1

      You need help and need to free your mind

  • @WISDOMvsKnowledge22
    @WISDOMvsKnowledge22 Год назад +1

    ROBBIE PARKER *

  • @Woody2Shoe
    @Woody2Shoe Год назад +2

    Can somebody please tell this nice gentleman that
    His Ukrainian flag is upside down behind him. It's like hanging our American Stars and Stripes upside down. Please fix that thank you

  • @kathleenweinberg6442
    @kathleenweinberg6442 Год назад

    I don't understand the cases when you find evidence and find them guilty it should be the end of the case

  • @davidbrown8517
    @davidbrown8517 Год назад

    I don't understand why the American legal system allows anyone to discuss and comment on an ongoing trial. It's bonkers.

  • @DETROIT1948
    @DETROIT1948 Год назад +2

    Cliff Watts.. The Truth and Nothing But The Truth.

  • @Lexielouwho
    @Lexielouwho Год назад +2

    And right now there's a country rap RUclipsr with over 3 million subs who's doing the same exact thing as AJ but with the Kiely Rodni case. He's said she wasn't real and its all a scam to collect GoFund me money. He thinks he's above the law and he's too arrogant to see the loss AJ has taken for this exact thing. I'm just waiting to see how many lawsuits he faces. It's sick. How people can inflict such pain on others for profit is just sickening to me. My prediction is within the year we'll see RU follow AJ in the hot seat and he'll lose the empire he's built.

  • @amos660
    @amos660 Год назад +7

    no mention of the parent laughing before the interview,

    • @livingfree7153
      @livingfree7153 Год назад

      I saw it all and I am with Alex Jones, Infowars and all the other video proof. They are using Jones to set an example to put up and shut up or else you will be censored and punished!

    • @livingfree7153
      @livingfree7153 Год назад

      He didn’t “lose” the case . He lost by DEFAULT meaning he didn’t fight the case at all.

  • @snellavision
    @snellavision Год назад +9

    Weirrd how CNN isn't held to the same standards as Alex Jones

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +3

      Weirrd? They don't sell supplements and lie to sell them

    • @Woedy818
      @Woedy818 Год назад

      @@walterbo7687 so supplements are somehow a bad thing??

  • @pumpthebrakes
    @pumpthebrakes Год назад

    Can anyone tell me why Alex jones said all those things about sandy hook in the first place?

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад

      Because he wants to grift money off his mindless sheep.
      By scaring them into "tHeY aRe cOmiNg fOr YoUr GuNs" and simultaneously claiming he will "fight" for them so this imaginary gun grab does NOT happen, they give him money to continue "the war".

    • @livingfree7153
      @livingfree7153 Год назад +1

      Bc there was video proof that it was all staged in his opinion. Actors.

  • @Cmz083
    @Cmz083 Год назад +1

    why didn't the State cap apply to Alex Jones? Texas cap $750,000. Just Like Johnny And Amber Cap of $350,000 ???

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +1

      Because Connecticut doesn't have one

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +1

      Who says it didn't ? Or won't ?
      Nothing has been decided, yet.
      There might be ways to get around it, there might not be.

  • @Karamia68
    @Karamia68 Год назад +3

    I wish Ben Chew and Camile were representing these people! I feel like the judge is reacting to AJ's statement outside the courthouse by being a total pushover and letting that creepy attorney talk over her and run the courtroom! Sad.
    What does it mean that she is going to 'canvas' AJ?

  • @contese6262
    @contese6262 Год назад +4

    im shocked at the bs I just listened to...

  • @tinkerbell74605
    @tinkerbell74605 Год назад

    Here is a somewhat silly question. Why is this dragging on if he admitted guilt? Does he want life or does he want the death penalty? How is he paying for all these attorneys? (I’m guessing he has no estate - so tax payers?).

    • @Creative-Chaos
      @Creative-Chaos Год назад +3

      This is a civil case. The jury will determine the amount of money Alex Jones owes the plaintiffs.

    • @careybogdanovic7
      @careybogdanovic7 Год назад +2

      In the Texas case an expert witness for the prosecution said he calculated Jones worth to be over 80 million

    • @davidbrown8517
      @davidbrown8517 Год назад

      Alex Jones has huge amounts of money stashed in tax havens around the World.

  • @gregss3963
    @gregss3963 Год назад +1

    Sorry but you know idea what you are talking about

  • @nicolenedonn3627
    @nicolenedonn3627 Год назад +1

    What’s up with her hair?

    • @davidbrown8517
      @davidbrown8517 Год назад

      It's better than the pathetic pony tail of the Jones lawyer.

  • @pumpthebrakes
    @pumpthebrakes Год назад +1

    PTB loves BC

  • @SuperJonatan100
    @SuperJonatan100 Год назад +1

    The narrator speaks too much and does not allow the guests to speak more of why they could say. Jumping to conclusion rather than objectively analyzing each party’s tactics and Ofcorse the judge’s handling. Just seems very bias not like how Law and Crime originally started. I do have to say though I like the Alex Jones coverage.

  • @PERRYTHEPROPHET
    @PERRYTHEPROPHET Год назад +3

    Has Alex shot those Kids? He has to pay just because he hurt the feeling of those parents!? I don't get it!

  • @kungfuscubabape953
    @kungfuscubabape953 Год назад +2

    AMBER HEARD AND ELAINE LIED

  • @waynechristie1405
    @waynechristie1405 Год назад

    too many commercial breaks !! definitely, severely disrupts the flow of the video almost to the point that one might wonder if they were suffering from ADHD !! Better funding sources required here???

  • @kinorspielmann4649
    @kinorspielmann4649 Год назад +1

    Presenter, stop MUMBLING!!! Articulate CLEARLY!!!
    Or find another job!!

  • @allsensesfiring
    @allsensesfiring Год назад +1

    Is this reporting gal any relation to THE DR. BADEN?, Who is always the go to EXPERT FORENSICS WITNESS?
    She looks like LIZ CHENEY with a different look/disguise, and a slightly different accent/speech delivery.🤔

  • @tomfrasiko4056
    @tomfrasiko4056 Год назад

    you can easily find books and sites on these false god meditation practices with false god names in the name of the books and youtube videos just like you can find many satanic or dark and witch meditation videos even using these meditation teachings names in the title and teachings of the videos or sites like the wiccans and there yoga and chakra symbols on there site

  • @LDSW
    @LDSW Год назад +2

    The emergence of social media started around 2005? Looks an entire era has been skipped. The early social media history emerged during the mid-1980s to the mid- to late-1990s. This era featured bulletin board systems (BBS), America Online (AOL), Compuserve, and Prodigy among others that were closed social media systems. Clint Watts jumped over this earlier pre-Internet social media era to the early 2000s.

    • @jojomakes
      @jojomakes Год назад +2

      It wasn't nearly as ferocious or all consuming as it was after 2005. Not by a long shot.

    • @mrtambourineman6107
      @mrtambourineman6107 Год назад

      Ha! No you are WRONG. It only took off in 2005 for about a million different reasons globally

  • @jessicatevnan3137
    @jessicatevnan3137 Год назад +2

    Notice Alex Jones isn't allowed onto youtube. You're only allowed to hear ppl disparage him.

  • @lilpiney11
    @lilpiney11 Год назад

    Pariah.

  • @mikdailyreview5277
    @mikdailyreview5277 Год назад +5

    Ben Chu certainly argued well in Johnny's case however he do well to remember that what we're trying to do is establish what if any were the damages that the plaintiffs have suffered. These need to be Quantified there should be a consideration of any medical costs or reputational damages but I've heard none of that mostly it's a bunch of conjecture around the supposed danger and nothing to quantify this. This is absolutely been a miscarriage of Justice thus far.
    The fact that he thought there was no apology on behalf of Jones but he talked about the Texas trial shows how little he paid attention. Ben missed a heartfelt apology to the families and a previously aired segment that went out and I believe 2017 that expressed sorrow for the mistake. The fact that Ben could miss this and speak with such certainty betrays his ignorance and partiality.

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +4

      You are talking about compensatory damages.
      There are also punitive damages. And they are there to deter and - well - PUNISH Alex for his conduct and have nothing to do with losses you can or should quantify.
      In Texas the plaintiffs got about 4 million in compensatory damages whereas 45 million were awarded in punitive damages.
      I am sure we will hear from experts further on in the trial. We are on day 6. This might be going on for another 2 1/2 weeks.
      There wasn't an apology. CERTAINLY not a heartfelt one. Or, to be more accurate: Maybe he did apologise, before slipping back into his default "this is staged or a hoax" BS.
      The suits were brought in 2018. That is about the time he became more careful about what he was saying. Until then he was saying one day that he didn't know what happened and the next that it was a hoax.
      Maybe you can point me into the direction of this 2017 broadcast with these expressions of sorrow for the mistake ?

    • @KidVolcano
      @KidVolcano Год назад +2

      And since those "apologies" he's ranted about how "I murdered the children!"
      One might suspect he's only apologetic that he's being held to account. He's certainly never issued a retraction.

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +3

      He waited 5 years to be sorrow ?? From 2012 to 2017? While meantime, for 5 years, he lied and lied profiting millions of dollars out of it? And when he heard "we suing him" he had sorrow? Are you so cynical to let him off of his responsibilities?

  • @edsherwood2173
    @edsherwood2173 Год назад

    “Anti fbi nonsense” damn’t I liked Ben too.

  • @notenough1484
    @notenough1484 Год назад +1

    To Ben Chew,
    My phone has several recordings of a long standing pattern of social events. I have many written notes to what I consider questioning circumstances of how the pattern fits. Your friend and client, may have sent a message to me about seeing me face to face. An individual can never be quite sure, after viewing video of some of his own struggles. I don’t have enough money to step into a firm that could fight this disruption. It continues each night and day. I am currently dealing with an undetermined health issue, all while navigating through this alone. 😓

    • @SteamPoweredSmurfette
      @SteamPoweredSmurfette Год назад +1

      It sounds like someone is trying to take advantage of you/scam you. Please don't respond to people impersonating celebrities, I promise they aren't real. The person trying to talk to you is only doing their job, which is to drain every single possible thing they can from you through advanced manipulation techniques. One of the quickest ways to see for yourself is to copy and paste some of their messages to you through Google... You'll get search results back that are identical or near identical.
      I promise you if it seems too good to be true, it is. Please don't trust anyone reaching out to you like this because just from your comment I was able to recognize that someone has been successful in convincing you enough where a part of you already believes that they are real.. I guarantee they are not.

    • @theloanranger2632
      @theloanranger2632 Год назад +4

      Ben Chew, who is a very busy lawyer, is not going to be reading your message in the RUclips video comments. Whatever your medical issue is you should see a doctor.

    • @notenough1484
      @notenough1484 Год назад

      @@SteamPoweredSmurfette what I know about real, is everything I have documented to what is happening in this apartment building. It is much of the same. Only my name and professional habits are not anything to what these others have built. Yet, the continued irritation is daily here. Not exactly what the intentions are of it all. You can’t get money from someone who has none. And the trials of some individuals are completely real. The children harmed and gone, are real.
      So, if I am real as well, and the professionals are, it may perhaps be important for others.
      Thank you for responding to me.
      I believe that message is a good way to source circumstances. Although, I have not been searching the tangled web patterns. Life has developed one of its own in front of me. Perhaps why I feel it’s important not to intermix the circumstances.
      Again, your kind message is appreciated, thank you.

    • @JS-qy3dk
      @JS-qy3dk Год назад

      @@notenough1484 For all that I know there are everywhere doctors and attorneys who help without payment. I'm from another country so search as much as you can. I would recommend first a doctor because I guess you are under tremendous pressure anxiety... you know better how you feel ... In my country for such issues I went to a psychiatrist and a neurologist. I don't know how it works there but FOR SURE psychiatrist to help you with his advices because you need to find strength for the next step which is an attorney. Sorry for my English. I hope I helped in some way. Don't give up 👊

    • @notenough1484
      @notenough1484 Год назад +1

      @@JS-qy3dk I went through that with doctors years ago. Huge mess to my system. Came out from that. The lawyer issue, they all want money first . 😓
      I have made contact within the last week to some lawyers. But thank you.

  • @smileykot2834
    @smileykot2834 Год назад

    The Ukrainian flag was the wrong way up. Other than that, all good.

  • @rhellman9528
    @rhellman9528 Год назад +1

    Listen to this nose swooning over his jukraine flag.......I can see where this channel is at

  • @JustinJonesFL
    @JustinJonesFL Год назад +16

    Bias af.

    • @strnglhld
      @strnglhld Год назад +2

      Biased*

    • @trialgoddess
      @trialgoddess Год назад +3

      Do you mean "biased?" OMG, are you related to sociopathic AF Alex Jones?

    • @oldladybabyprunes4329
      @oldladybabyprunes4329 Год назад +3

      He was already found guilty, this trial is for punitive penalties. Most people are biased against this kind of evil.

  • @rebellucy6200
    @rebellucy6200 Год назад +61

    Ben Chew is a great guy personally, but the jury is NOT supposed to send the world a message as he stated. They ARE supposed to look at the facts of the case. To hear the people here saying how awful Alex is over and over shows the case has already been decided in thier minds before the evidence had played out in this case.

    • @DesertDog2
      @DesertDog2 Год назад +29

      Yes, juries are supposed to render verdicts for their case only. The point of the punishment a jury or judge imposes is to send a message to society that this behavior is not okay. Same goes for criminal cases. The WHOLE point of the justice system is to keep society safe. So yes, juries send a message with their verdicts. It generally makes others think twice about their actions if there is a threat of severe punishment. Ben Chew is a great guy and he’s right.

    • @Karamia68
      @Karamia68 Год назад

      He is a disgusting excuse of a human being! How could anyone with a brain not see that?!?!

    • @GoCoyote
      @GoCoyote Год назад +3

      There is a big difference between a criminal and a civil trial, but both types of trials do in fact serve a dual purpose, both the punishment and redress of wrongs, AND to send a message to others that are doing, or might do, the same behavior, that they will possibly face the same punishment, legal consequences, or financial penalties.

    • @rebellucy6200
      @rebellucy6200 Год назад +2

      @@DesertDog2 Society is not on trial in this case. This case is about questioning the government. This case is about shutting down anyone who questions what the government does. There is a FBI agent suing Alex in this case. Pretty obvious what is going on here.

    • @FerreusNRG
      @FerreusNRG Год назад +6

      Alex Jones IS awful. Can't wait to celebrate his next defeat in court

  • @DanIel-fl1vc
    @DanIel-fl1vc Год назад +4

    I'm not American and this trial makes you look real bad.
    What you're saying is, sue whoever you politically disagree with into oblivion. Even if what they're saying is correct.
    I wonder how many people that are not as famous and wealthy as Alex that has had this happen to them.
    And if you think I'm wrong, imagine your boogey man right winger, evil nazi person suing you because you said something mean about meat eaters. Then you'd be at our side of the fence and see this situation for what it really is.

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +2

      Maybe you should learn what the definition of defamation is before embarassing yourself in youtube comments...

  • @ReelAZMatt
    @ReelAZMatt Год назад

    They seriously needed an expert to tell us how the internet works?

  • @Turner9090
    @Turner9090 Год назад +6

    Law&Crime uses the same structure as CNN,FOX,MSNBC, so they can show small clips and create a narrative. I also think it’s very interesting that they would bring in Johnny Depps attorney to this situation…Trying to split a common group up are we???

  • @ericwallace6073
    @ericwallace6073 Год назад +1

    As of right now 135 comments...I see 6...129 must be questioning the narrative

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +1

      No... You only are not able to use your phone

  • @handsoffmygunmf6750
    @handsoffmygunmf6750 Год назад +8

    First time in history that a person was given a default judgement that showed up for a trial. Whether you like Jones or not, this should concern you. This could set a precedent and a judge could do this to you someday and deny you your constitutional rights.

    • @Creative-Chaos
      @Creative-Chaos Год назад +7

      He didn’t participate in giving any data that the courts requested. His behavior resulted in the verdict being against him.

    • @juliecrane9647
      @juliecrane9647 Год назад +4

      This is the penalty phase.
      Jones did not show and gave zero documents that were subpoenaed.
      He lost due to default.
      Blame his ego and his pathetic lawyers.
      So you're ok with Jones giving out the phone numbers and addresses of these parents of murdered children?

    • @libertywatcher1247
      @libertywatcher1247 Год назад +4

      @@Creative-Chaos the judge was biased from the moment this case landed on her desk. Anyone with eyes can see it.

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +7

      @@libertywatcher1247 "Anyone with eyes can see it."
      You mean, you are feeling really, really bad because your compulsive liar hero is held accountable.

    • @SokimMan
      @SokimMan Год назад +4

      @@Creative-Chaos There was no evidence the data they wanted existed and the defense said it did not exist. "You did not participate in providing me with hypothetical data that I can't prove actually exists and if you don't provide it you are in default".

  • @dianahoward2606
    @dianahoward2606 Год назад +8

    Ben Chew @14:30-15:30
    Alex BELIEVES what he tells his audience. How about those big PHARMA ads. Do these rules apply to them as well? Or Dr.Fauci et al?

  • @justice100forwin2
    @justice100forwin2 Год назад +9

    Don't ever question anything guys, go to sleep, nothing to see here. I just want to thank Alex for educating me regarding so many issues. The fact these people pretend to not know who the globalists are, and the aim of globalisation is pathetic. It's so sad to see America is having show trials now.

    • @MaisieDaisyUpsadaisy
      @MaisieDaisyUpsadaisy Год назад +2

      What’s the aim of globalization?

    • @juliecrane9647
      @juliecrane9647 Год назад +5

      Alex didn't educate you. He propagandized you with conspiracy theories and lies.
      Pathetic.

    • @juliecrane9647
      @juliecrane9647 Год назад +1

      It's also pathetic you can't spell globalization.
      Bawawawawawa.

  • @le4-677
    @le4-677 Год назад +5

    in a lot of ways, he's the killer? lmao, not biased at all

  • @lawtubereport1408
    @lawtubereport1408 Год назад +3

    Two default judgements two separate states = Show Trials
    This is nothing more than shutting down Alex Jones first then the rest of us next.

    • @livingfree7153
      @livingfree7153 Год назад

      He didn’t try the case. It would have cost him more money to fight it. The max penalty is $5.6 million.

  • @drwrap3431
    @drwrap3431 Год назад +2

    I'd like to sue whoever cut that poor woman's hair.

  • @wgsmit02
    @wgsmit02 Год назад +1

    Well this one lied about what Alex said right out of the gate

  • @gyrthez246
    @gyrthez246 Год назад +1

    I don't like what Alex claims, and I believe his claims are entirely false, and I do think he should be held accountable for that, however I think the takes from the panel at some points were not very good. Alex didn't pull the trigger. He just exacerbated the aftermath.
    It's not a whole lot better than pulling the trigger, but I think for clarity purposes it's best to not stray into that area. This case doesn't really need debating, it's pretty clear cut, but some statements/opinions from panel members here were not as clear cut.

  • @my3sons386
    @my3sons386 Год назад +7

    So, with that lawyers logic, can I sue Dr. Fauci, and Pifzer ?

    • @anacarver333
      @anacarver333 Год назад

      for what exactly? i wanna hear why stupidity the conservatives are crying about now lmfao

    • @allsensesfiring
      @allsensesfiring Год назад

      Where's the 1 reply that should be right here?

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +4

      Yes, go ahead. who's stopping you?

  • @adamburling9551
    @adamburling9551 Год назад +4

    Yeah wow, I guess Alex Jones doesn't have a right to have a business and sell what he wants.. this is pathetic.

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +1

      He doesn't have the right to defame others. Can you impress it in your brain?

    • @davidbrown8517
      @davidbrown8517 Год назад

      Jones doesn't have to right to say disgusting lies.

  • @sunnybunny6278
    @sunnybunny6278 Год назад

    wOW. I've gone right off Ben Chew. Jones's lawyer spoke about the kids in his opening statement - he named every one of them whereas the bulk of what plaintiff lawyer was talking about was💰💰💰

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +1

      Ever thought about the possibility that that's a tactic to deflect idiots from what the case is about ?
      It seems to have worked with you...

  • @lassebauer
    @lassebauer Год назад +3

    Good to see such a balanced analysis of the Jones trial. ..oh, wait

    • @Froggy77100
      @Froggy77100 Год назад +1

      The title clearly states this particular segment features Ben Chew giving his opinions. The entirety of the prior & current court proceedings being shown is as balanced & void of opinionated commentary as it gets.

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад

      What would a "balanced analysis" look like ?

  • @jeffgoesrandom4217
    @jeffgoesrandom4217 Год назад +7

    This trial is preposterous. Not because of Jones making false or inaccurate claims. It's obvious he was wrong. But, that a lawsuit can occur which is basically against free speech. Defamation seems to be something that damages a reputation. This seems like an opinion that was wrong. If these cases continue, no one can state an opinion...

    • @davidbrown8517
      @davidbrown8517 Год назад +2

      Telling disgusting lies is not free speech.

    • @eeayquetting5963
      @eeayquetting5963 Год назад

      The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation

  • @wgsmit02
    @wgsmit02 Год назад

    So Ben has no idea how the judge has precluded jones from an affirmative defense

  • @Jamesnebula
    @Jamesnebula Год назад +1

    This case is going to lead the bad things in America I fear, because Alex Jones is a very iconic figure. Although he talks a lot of nonsense He is an embodiment of something utterly American and free. Now he's basically the perfect martyr.

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +3

      The embodiement of something utterly American is a compulsive liar ?
      Wow, no wonder your country is in so much trouble 🤣

  • @Teambr00klyn
    @Teambr00klyn Год назад +1

    you lost all credibility when you talked about the ukrainian flag

  • @dalehalliday3578
    @dalehalliday3578 Год назад

    it would be nice if the plaintiffs could sue all those followers of Jones, who torment them too

    • @ezrc9294
      @ezrc9294 Год назад

      I like Alex Jones - the man has a good heart and who the heck cares if he got it wrong - are you free from error and if not I would like to sue you for a million dollars for lying.

  • @DavidJones-we2ex
    @DavidJones-we2ex Год назад +2

    2:03 this lady is a liar I watched Alex outside the courtroom.

    • @Woedy818
      @Woedy818 Год назад +1

      She lied multiple times! Alex should now sue for defamation 😂

    • @davidbrown8517
      @davidbrown8517 Год назад

      The only liar is Jones.

  • @worryphree
    @worryphree Год назад +2

    If I was Alex Jones' attorney, I'd subpoena the death certificates.

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +4

      Oh great. So you are saying he STILL doesn't believe it happened ?
      That's a pretty "helpful" take
      🤣🤣🤣

  • @LT1597
    @LT1597 Год назад +2

    He didn’t loose in the traditional American Law way. The Judge found him “Guilty” by default for not turning over information even though he did. The “trial” was about how much money he should pay to the money grabbing victims which will be zero lol 😂

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +3

      And you "know" that he turned over that information from where exactly ?

    • @livingfree7153
      @livingfree7153 Год назад +1

      Exactly. False flag!

    • @LT1597
      @LT1597 Год назад +1

      @@prumbuggel from the simple example that somehow he didn’t turn over all his financial information which isn’t required until the damages phase but he somehow turned over all raw cellphone records that didn’t go in his favor? Or the fact that he was found guilty by default on two other defamation cases? Which goes against due process rights and circumvents a bullet proof defense? I know it’s hard for y’all but try to make the connections and use more than one brain cell 🤡

  • @DavidJones-we2ex
    @DavidJones-we2ex Год назад +19

    Alex does not owe these people anything. This is silly. Just because someone says something you don't like does not mean you get money.

    • @ginawhiteley8834
      @ginawhiteley8834 Год назад +1

      It's not that simple. Alex Jones accused these parents of lying and actually being paid to say their children were dead when really their children were alive. He showed pictures of other children claiming the parents were paid money to move their children to others schools. This caused the families harassment because their children were dead. Cruelty was the point.:(((

    • @Woody2Shoe
      @Woody2Shoe Год назад +2

      WAIT, GOOD GOD I HOPE YOU ARE ALEX JONES'S FATHER. DOCTOR DENTIST JONES

    • @toasted_.coconut
      @toasted_.coconut Год назад +5

      Incorrect. Purposefully harming someone with lies have consequences.

    • @graceykinz
      @graceykinz Год назад +4

      ever heard of civil court by any chance?

    • @oldladybabyprunes4329
      @oldladybabyprunes4329 Год назад +3

      When your lies cause other lunatics to harass grieving parents with death threats you are liable. It is evil.

  • @Mohohoh
    @Mohohoh Год назад

    Bad audio. Just makes it annoying to watch and takes the momentum out of the report.

  • @konverzny
    @konverzny Год назад

    I find it ironic that the Ukrainian flag is upside down, it's like saying "I hope they will be crushed" when in reality he probably wanted to say "I stand with Ukraine".

  • @chrisbbbbchris1
    @chrisbbbbchris1 Год назад +1

    I am disappointed i chew. Thought he was a great lawyer in the deep v heard trial; after seeing this, i have to think he is just as crooked as most of these other people. sad.

  • @davidlang9939
    @davidlang9939 Год назад +14

    STRIP HIM SOO COMPLETELY THAT HE DISAPPEARS!!!

    • @msknowitall4085
      @msknowitall4085 Год назад +8

      Wow...thats so american of you
      HOW ABOUT THIS...HOW ABOUT RACHEL MADDOW AND JOY REID DISAPPEAR???
      THEY LIE SO BAD

    • @haonsha
      @haonsha Год назад +1

      @@msknowitall4085 ok them too, get rid of all of them

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад

      @@msknowitall4085 I once went to Sweden

    • @drstuartjacobsen
      @drstuartjacobsen Год назад

      @@msknowitall4085 well she complied with discovery and won her case lol😅😅
      - Saturday, May 23, 2020 MSNBC host Rachel Maddow won a legal victory Friday in a defamation lawsuit brought against her by the parent company of conservative television network One America News, or OAN.

    • @drstuartjacobsen
      @drstuartjacobsen Год назад +1

      @@msknowitall4085 and defaming the families of children murdered is your idea of America?

  • @italia3929
    @italia3929 Год назад +3

    This case is ridiculous. What happened to free speech.

    • @walterbo7687
      @walterbo7687 Год назад +2

      Defamation hás nothing to share with free speech. Is in Italia defamation admitted because of free speech (is it constitutionally protected?). Send me your details with your address and allow me my free speech about you

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад +2

      Nothing happened to free speech.

    • @wgsmit02
      @wgsmit02 Год назад

      Saying something didn’t happen isn’t defamation

    • @prumbuggel
      @prumbuggel Год назад

      @@wgsmit02 If you implicate the parents of dead kids in atrocious crimes along the way, it is.

  • @pimper347
    @pimper347 Год назад +3

    better hope the jury doesn't see this...grounds for a mistrial?

    • @emilyp9009
      @emilyp9009 Год назад +1

      It is in their jury instructions not view any media especially regarding the case. In many and most cases, jurors take their job very seriously.

    • @TangoNevada
      @TangoNevada Год назад +1

      How so?

    • @shawn5662
      @shawn5662 Год назад +1

      If the jury sees anything it’s grounds for a mistrial.

    • @trialgoddess
      @trialgoddess Год назад

      The jury always is instructed NOT to view social media, news or pop culture shows that might mention the trial or the event(s) it is about, or to read newspapers or magazines, discuss the case with anyone, etc., that could disclose information (or misinformation in the case of InfoWars). How can you not know this??? It is a standard daily verbal instruction that judges give jurors every day in the USA, often more than once in a day.

    • @handsoffmygunmf6750
      @handsoffmygunmf6750 Год назад +1

      Unfortunately, the judge denied Jones his right to a jury trial and declared him guilty.