A friend of mine was born to a family whose members and relatives were all blond and blue eyed, except her. Her dark brown almond eyes, jet black hair and darkened skin caused all sorts of commotion at her birth. Mother was accused of adultery and divorce proceedings were almost underway until one aunt, the family geneologist announced that the girl's long forgotten great grandfather met and married a beautiful native woman when he was stationed in India when he served as an officer for the British Impirial Forces The couple returned to England and lived out their lives together. My friend did not display 50 or 25 or 13 percent of her great grand mother's genetic material. Human genetics does not play by the roughly calculated arithmetic of Mendel's peas. DNA is far more complicated and fasicnating than that.
This is very interesting. If DNA holds true to its particular intricacies, we should all sire black children soon or in the future. I used to believe if we all looked the same. Eyes, skin color, hair there would be less prejudice. I was wrong. Humans are so flawed, we would find something to NOT love our neighbor. We can be so great and likewise so evil. The human species works against nature. To C. Berg. - Ativism is more widespread. We just dont report on it.
@@cburg6383 Yeah, probably a good description, short order version atavism in her case where inheritable attributes are not diluted but kept relatively intact somehow isolate from the blond blue eye sequences. My brother has reddish hair, no-one else in the family. I suspect the red is due to our distant Scottish/Irish heritage. Mendel only dealt with 2-3 characteristics, the human genome is much more complex and surprising than that.
General traits categorically are known by geneticist to be able to skip generations. Additionally, there are recessive genes and dominant genes. Generally in the past 200 years they have flipped the factual script on what is dominant. Although it is obvious they decided to create untruths.
A native girl around 1900 recorded her tribe's oral history in a book. She speaks of very tall red haired people that were here when her tribe arrived on the continent long ago.
@@PlanetRockJesus Her name was Sarah Winnemucca. She was the daughter of a Paiute chief. Many people challenge her account but I see no reason why she would feel the need to lie about something like that.
Where and when i grew up as a child, there was a lot of strip mining going on then, and my father would tell me of how beautiful the land where we lived once was when he grew up there. We were taught in school that the land would never recover in our life time because strip mining destroys it, and it would take hundred of years before vegetation would return. By the time I was 30, those lands looked much better, and now that I'm in my 60s, I have to tell younger people (much to they're astonishment) how it looked when i was a child. People with agendas LIE. Sometime out of ignorance, and sometimes out of purpose. God's creation is changing continually. We can't kill it. We only change it for a moment.
@@kp-legacy-5477 what about if the land was in a volcanic area,would you sat the same thing after lava has inundated previously forested land. The thing is wether man made or nature made,the earth continues to evolve.
@@kp-legacy-5477 nothing is ever the same as it was in the past. Nature changes things all on it's own. A human lifetime is insignificant on a geological timescale. All of human history is. And the only reason nature matters AT ALL is because Humans are here to experience and observe it.
My great grandmother was a New Hampshire Native American, possibly “Abnaki”; great grandfather (Reed) was Scottish. My mother and a couple brothers could have played the “native” roll in cowboy Indian movies. My grandfather passed as Scottish. I was stationed in Japan (marine) in the early fifties and my Japanese crew brought me a photograph of a Japanese boy who looked like me, spitting image! My dna says I’m 80% European, 17% Native American and, get this, 3% sub Saharan African. I’ve got it covered!
People who use to work for 23 and me said that the tests were not right,so you could be 80 african,17percent native and 3percent European.they do DNA test just like they did with history and the population numbers.
@@Flamelit that explains why my whole family's DNA matches our genealogy going back to the 1400s except one daughter who did hers with 23 and Me. The rest of us are UK and Scandinavia and hers claims she's got a lot of Sub-Saharan African. Seems mighty impossible considering the family history, the shape if her facial features, and her pale skin, light red hair and million freckles. I think they're trying to rewrite our family history.
Japanese are mixture of aboriginal Japanese (who looked like aboriginal Australians) and Far East Asians who came in 2000 years ago into Japanese islands. Most aboriginals were wiped out by new comers, but there were still some blood mixing.
Stop it you know deep down inside you know the answer there's no complaints about natives receiving reparations because most of them are white... looking like Sally Field
More than a few years ago, the TV program, 60 Minutes produced a segment on the earliest Americans. What the program said was that the people we think of as native Americans actually came from somewhere else and were not the real "native Americans." It was really interesting and well worth trying to find on RUclips.
It’s true. People fled Jerusalem and came over here and brought the records. Some ran south of Jerusalem and took their writing with them too. The ones who ran south had the Dead Sea scrolls. The ones who came here their record was found in NY. They were on metal plates.
Columbus never made it to what we now call "North America" - "He was the first European to sight the Bahamas archipelago and then the island later named Hispaniola, now split into Haiti and the Dominican Republic. On his subsequent voyages he went farther south, to Central and South America. He never got close to what is now called the United States"
I was recently reading some information about the Chickasaw people of Western Tennessee and the Northern Mississippi and Alabama area. The Chickasaw have a "world wide" flood story that tells of a world wide flood that took place years ago and only one family survived with a pair of each kind of animal. There's was no mention of an Ark in the version that I read about, but it was still very similar to the biblical account. It's amazing to find similar flood stories around the world.
Leif Erikson was the son of Erik the Red, founder of the first European settlement on what is now called Greenland. Born in Iceland around A.D. 970, Erikson sailed to Norway around A.D. 1000. Erikson sailed off course on his way back to Greenland and landed on the North American continent, where he explored a region he called Vinland. He may also have sought out Vinland based on stories of an earlier voyage by an Icelandic trader. After spending the winter in Vinland. He is believed to be the first European to reach the North American continent, nearly four centuries before Christopher Columbus arrived in 1492.
Columbus arrived in the West Indies, no evidence that he lands on N.America at all. Perhaps it is convenient to refer to Columbus, rather than Leif Erikson hundreds of years before, especially if that landing is in northern Canada, rather than current USA, or John Cabot, who actually did land in N.America, but again in modern day Canada. It may be a good idea with history, to actually TRY to be factual not political. The vast majority of history is yet to be uncovered, we shouldn't be so arrogant that we "know" it. It you have ten pieces of a 10,000 piece puzzle, you don't really know the full picture.
I'm chuckling. On a much smaller time scale, new people to corporations always think nothing good existed before they showed up and they're there to enlighten those who've been there all along. This is incredible information and has the qualification of enticing modern man to think very differently about our Earth, what has been and what can be. We are so easily distracted. Thanks for sharing!!
It all sounds well and good, but please don't forget that all of these books are just the opinion of the writers. the older I get the more I realise that most writers are just good Story tellers! I often wonder how much is really fact!
They have been found Celtic markings all over the United States! I believe there were many types of people in America, but the Government refuses to allow us to know the truth, especially if it could prove that Christianity was true!
Well if it wasn't them. So what, them were there before white man. Or because of this research and them weren't the first justifys what the white man did in the genocide of many distinct native culture's. That most probably did not refer to themselves as so called Americans.
I teach 7th-12th history. I had my students examine the facial features of the Mongolians and Chinese vs. groups of Native Americans along the west coast, as well as examining the "Great Wall" of California. We also looked at similarities between the Maya/Inca/Aztec culture and Egyptian culture. My hope is that it widened their view of history to see the broader story.
@@JosephDVines I am working on not compartmentalizing them. Thankfully I teach at a private Christian school where I can teach real history. They don't teach this in public schools at all, and only through self-education have I been able to broaden my horizons to the truth. I'm responsible for every student's history education from 7th grade through seniors, so I have a responsibility to teach the truth.
The Vikings made landfall on North America way before Columbus bumped into Hispaniola, Columbus made landfall in the America's, and St. Brendan The Voyager from Ireland most likely discovered North America before the Vikings came. From his own writings.
Columbus knew the Islands where there and he knew to go below the Sargasso sea from other Portuguese that had been there before. The story taught about Columbus was a made up story by a story writer, Washington Irving. Columbus never landed on North America.
Many years ago I found a book in an antique shop. It was written by one of the earliest missionaries who came to the USA from Europe - in the 14th and 15th centuries. The missionary tells how the Odawa chiefs claimed that when they first came to Michigan there were other people already living here (I am from Michigan). The chiefs laughingly bragged that they killed them all and took over the land. Sadly I loaned the book to a special friend who has passed away and her children do not know what happened to the book. But this information is such an important fit into what you are now discussing.
Missionaries lied a lot. Their entire goal was to spread propoganda against d others and for their own. Need real hard proof. DNA, physical evidences, bloodline etc. Their whole goal was ethnocide and brainwashing of d natives. Heck, church tried to claim Hakenkreuz as swastika to blame d Hindus for their connections with Hitler. They provided him with everything, they were d first ones to give him legitimacy and make treaties. Even today missionaries do some dark deeds. Stole entire lands/kingdoms from d natives, Hawaii for ex. They’re d worst of human kind. Don’t even get started on warring and inquisitions. 😒
If you read Alan Eckart's WIlderness War series, you have a book called WIlderness War. It was about observations General Washington's men made when he split half his northern army towards the end of the war and chased "the savages" out of upstate, NY. Eckert's works are highly documented in the back of his book with depositions, journals, diarys, letters, etc. Washington's men found pools of fish hatcheries, orchards, extensive farming, and a high degree of agriculture.
Do people forget the aztecs, mayans and incans are native americans? I think it speaks more to how people view the native groups of both since technically us native south americans still exist we are just called latino now where as most north natives were genocided
@@tlaloqq It wasn't genocide, genocide implies intent. The damage done by small pox was what destroyed populations before Europeans arrived. There was plenty of war fare, and Europeans certainly took advantage of tribal disputes to benefit themsleves. That said, i home school my daughter. I've made it a point when talking about history to discuss the differences between the various native groups here in the Americas. How the Nahua tribes that weren't part of the Aztec Triple alliance sided with the Spanish, intermarried, and created the Mestiso (mestizo? not sure on spelling). How many of south American tribes still exist in numbers higher than those in the US. I live in Arizona and travel through reservations multiple times a year. The Navajo have their own soda brand (Navajo Fizz) that is, hands down, the best soda i've ever had. All natural ingredients (with the exception of the sassparilla flavoring in the Root Beer).
@@shyquildurham9695 so.. they didn’t understand how germs spread, but knew it was in blankets that they were trading? The first bio-weapons far predate the colonization. Mongols would launch dead animals into cities to spread disease, it was believes diseases spread through bad air and corpses produced bad air. This was the Miasma theory which held sway until the mid 1800’s The earliest dates i can find for the intentional use of small pox as a bio-weapon were in the revolutionary war. This is 200 years AFTER the introduction of smallpox to the Americas by the first waves of explorers and settlers. Thats assuming they hadn’t already encountered and been ravaged by the disease from the Viking landings. Consider the pilgrims. Tisquantum (Squanto) was the last of his tribe, the rest having died of disease, likely small pox, before the pilgrims arrived in 1620. There is a determination to make the settlers more evil than they were, which is rich considering the native practices of ritual torture followed by cannibalism practiced by many tribes, including the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois). By the time Europeans tried to use it as a bio weapon it had already done its damage. The population was already decimated, worse than decimated which implies 1 of every 10. If it is genocide by negligence, then the Natives are guilty of actual intentional genocide, per their own records having wiped out multiple groups and driven some to live in caves. The focus on the tragedy of the past without regard for the future is part of what holds many on the reservations back. They need to look forward. I drive cross country multiple times a year. I pass through the Navajo Nation. They sell the BEST soda i’ve ever had. Made from all natural ingredients that they grow. they have made something wonderful. This the path forward. They have taken their care of their land and traditions and used it to make something great. Navajo Fizz is delicious, and i recommend anyone who foes through their land to buy some. I hope they expand and start selling it either online or in stores. They could use it create a lot of good for their people. And i hope they do.
The real " Seminole" ( which means runaway in Cherokee) were originally a make up of a few tribes that were sent to reservations in Oklahoma. The Indians that broke free or weren't rounded up were runaways " Seminoles" where they ran south to Florida being hunted down. Until the American Civil War came along which saved these Indians from being rounded up or killed. After the Civil war, US Army left them alone not to cause trouble in the south plus these Indians were now in the swamps and met up with other local Indians and were hiding pretty well. Later on they became the Seminole Tribe, which didn't exist in Florida until they ran down to it.
@@davegink9222 didnt the native Americans forced on the trail of tears..take their slaves with them? Even freed slaves that were rich enough would buy slaves. Huge mess
At roughly 21:40 there is an assertion that there was an over 100 year gap between Columbus arriving in 1492 and the beginning of history in America in 1620 with the arrival of the Pilgrims. That glosses over the establishment of St. Augustine in what is now Florida by Spain in 1565 , Roanoke by the English in 1587 and Jamestown in what is now Virginia in 1607.
I was adopted, and when I studied both the genealogy of my biological and adoptive families, I discovered that my adoptive mother was my distant cousin by a marriage between our distant cousins.
Well when there are only 25 last names in what used to be in the county phone book. My Aunt Pearl married with a man that had grandma's maiden name. 3rd cousins. There are as many people living in that county today as were there in 1900. BUT what really surprises me is my younger sister looks like a Cherokee.
I'm from North Carolina and my paternal heritage in America goes back to the early 1600's in North America. My great .... great grandfather (Irish) married my great ... great grandmother, who was a Native American and they lived in the Five Nations Territory as documented in the National Archives. My father always spoke about and showed me Indian Culture and history. The Native American map you showed would put us in the Catawba area. My dad was always pointing out Indian names that I am familiar with in the Southeastern United States. Thank you for this video.
Growing up in Minnesota back in the 60s and 70s , I learned to keep the sites of real giants we found while hunting or foraging needed to be kept secret. There are also other things in the woods that shouldn't be there but are and I'm not talking about crashed UFOs only. 🏆😁
Responding to your comment about, ( There are also other things in the woods that shouldn't be there but are.) I live in Maine and I have seen only twice in my life. A large black cat with long hair and a long tail. It shouldn't exist according to wildlife experts. We have no record of such a thing. I was snowmobiling with a friend who has seen 4 of them throughout his life. We stopped on a new logging road and in 3 leaps crossed the road in front of us about 100 yards. This thing must have weighed 100 to 150 pounds. We both seen it and that was my first time. My buddy said he seen them before and he called it a black cat. It didn't have short hair but long hair. Anyway it was very interesting and I'd love to get a picture of one to prove it exists.
Minnesota is the land of giants- LeSeuer especially. The whole valley there. They are green. Jolly, too. We need to use technology to scan the hills there to detect grave sites with giant bones.
there was no honesty here. He lied about what paradigm the evidence supports. It doesn't support a young Earth. Notice that Jeanson dishonestly picks and chooses which science he accepts - he says carbon dating is reliable when it suits him, but as soon as carbon dating shows that his religious book is wrong, he rejects it - with absolutely no reason offered. Even the way he presented this video is dishonest. He's trying to claim the evidence agrees with his religious belief - but the stereotypes he talks about are the product of western Christian assumptions about history that derived from the Bible. When he says it's a surprise to find out that pre columbian Americans had a thriving and diverse civilisation - that's because White Christians insisted it wasn't possible. It's secular science that has proven otherwise.
This is the first time I've come to this channel, and so far all the descriptions of how the Americas used to be check out. When farmers clearing land in the Amazon kept finding substantial earthworks grown over by the jungle, it became obvious there used to be more people there. People have since been mapping the ground under the forest canopy with lasers from above, demonstrating widespread habitation. The black earth is replicated by "biochar", or charcoal infused with microbes fed by rich nutrients like urine and flour, that makes plants very healthy. I'll hear what you have to say next.
I am fascinated with the LIDAR work going on in South America. I really wish there were more of an effort to make TV, documentaries, something.. some way to watch & keep up with it.
Like areas kept poor and desolate, take part of Nebraska for one example. They aren't digging or plowing or anything all those bizarre rolling mounds, hills, bluffs and steppes. I dunno about anyone else but it feels electric in certain parts, how better to hide things then to make it almost unbearable to breathe there....
Why do you think they manipulate our food industry?? To only allow the worst practices and enforce ridiculous rules. Run good people off their land, bring in more profit driven controlled idiots to be in charge. Do you know why we don't get stickers on meat telling us where it came from.. why do they regulate seeds why are they not allowing small farms to thrive??
"used to be more people there". - so how do you calculate the population from the earthworks? for example how do you know they didn't just move to different locations over time?
I'm not sure who doesn't understand we are ALL one people, just different shades of brown. I'm 60 and have been taught that all my life., I'm "white" btw. When I did my first DNA test I was thrilled to see what I already knew there on paper. I embrace all my heritage!
I read 1491 about ten years ago and found it fascinating and interesting that the Indian tribes were terraforming the area long before Columbus. The blaze of color in the fall leaves was in many parts of the northeast an actual blazing fire or fires set by the tribes to remove the understory of brush and invasive plants and create new growth of grasses to encourage the herds of animals to grow nearby.
Me too. In a US history class. Btw, the reason California keeps having wildfires that are so hard to control is that they've banned those essential controlled burns that the people did long before Europeans came.
@@echofoxtrot2.051 But, but, but, but, but, no, its the global warming. Uh, wait a minute, yeah? Oh! The global climate change. Wait, what now? Oh, ok, I see. Its the man made gl- What now? Fine. Its the human caused climate change, but not from all humans. The uber rich people's jet fuel and giant vehicles aren't as bad as the regular cars the commoners use. How dare you cause forest fires with your going to work and moving around the world somewhat freely!
I am a 67 year old male in the US only second generation here in the states . Wile growing up I was told I had Scottish blood from my mother's father ,her mother was said to be Polish and German.My father's parents were both Italian. At 63 I had taken the 23 and me testing and through my father I am 50 % Italian but on my mother's side my grandfather was not Scottish at all he was English , Irish , and Scandinavian...Now my mother's mother had no less than some 41 nationalities starting from north west Africa up through Asia then west through Turkey, and on throughout eastern Europe into western Europe to Poland and up into Russia. NOT A DROP OF SCOTTISH BLOOD ...but as I said I am a second generation American and that's what the people become a mix of all the continually conquered people throughout Europe and then the Americas . And here in the Americas more than anywhere else the acceptance of mixed marriages has relaxed to the point that I believe at some point if not already there will be a people who are of all nationalities.
The Irish might still explain it. At one point very far back, the Irish and the Scottish were one people. There was a disagreement and some of them left and settled in what is now known as Scotland. Some Scottish last names are also Irish names that are accepted by Scottish clan societies as accepted descendants of those who were part of the Scottish clan. It sounds like you took a DNA test, if so, that DNA are the dominant genes that consist of you as a person. It does not factor in that you still descend from a Scottish ancestor, it just means you didn't inherit that person's genes when you were being born. It also does not factor in that you are a carrier for the next generation, of genes you don't have as your own personal dominant genes. This is why the paperwork is so important. I look like an Allison, that gene skipped a few generations to get to me but it just doesn't change the fact that I also descend from the Duncans and as such, I still am the 45th great grandson of Duncan I, King of Scots. I am who I am and dna is just a small part of that. It's a good place to start but it's not the final word on the subject like some try to believe that it is. I hope that helps.
@Picalo Pete They are and when someone wants to get a test done they are the first ones I mention but I always tell them exactly what they're getting so they know that while it is a great place to start, it won't be everything.
My parents' DNA tests both showed Scottish ancestry when there's no family history from that area, it was all recorded as Scandinavia and Germany, with the surprise being Hungarian/Magyar, but that's easily explained by the nearness of the regions. Doing a little more digging, I think it's the preponderance of the haplogroup (I think it's R1b) that predominates in Scotland, even though it's common across Europe that made 23 assign you Scottish ancestry. If you're really curious, My True Ancestry will match your DNA to archeological finds, and what I found with my family is that yes, we really do match finds in Scotland and England, but they're generally from the Bronze Age, and Viking Age England. For my family, we're pretty much everything north of the Alps, back to Hunter Gatherers, with Scythian (from modern day Ukraine and Russia) as the exception.
@@deadcatbounce3124 Exactly, it's those type of things that mess people up. That's a good option to help people understand. I have Russian and Roman ancestors and when my dad did his test, it didn't even pick that up. It's a great place to start but like I said, the tests aren't everything.
There is a rock in the mountains of western North Carolina that is out of the way but tourists like to go see it. It has a lot of letters carved into it that are undeciphered. The Cherokee were asked about it, but they say that the carvings were done by people who lived there before them. Apparently, this generation doesn't know who those people were, but they know there were people here before their people came.
So what? There were over 1,000 different Native languages do you actually think that Cherokees which is not even their real name which you as a white person do not know were the only tribes in what you call now North carolina?
Besides the Cherokees were the most colonized of all the tribes so they lost their history way before all the other tribes did due to christianization and other factors imposed by whites so asking them is like asking a white person they only speak their own language from recovery not in practice
I recently watched a similar article on RUclips, it said archaeologists in the US have dated long boats, settlements, weapons, jewellery and ceramics that belonged to Vikings, predating Columbus by several hundred years.
Pretty well established now. I suspect we seriously underestimate earlier civilisations. I wouldn’t be surprised if VERY early people were all globally connected.
The problem with Indians, they were Nomadic They had. No. Known permanent structures. Accept in Mexico, the AZ TEC's. So they had t Tippies and followed animals Buffalo around for food. No permanent settlement. S so show me your permanent settlement a city.@@LemonScreech
Glad you found the book 1491.... When I found it, it amazed me some of the discoveries he had observed in South America. I studied North American Archaeology briefly years ago, and the one thing they always impressed upon us that disease was the main killer, and the people that remained were more like refugees than anything else. The Hopewell mound builders are proof that there used to be a great big nation and trade in the North once.
But how do you explain copper in europe in ancient times from isle royale. How do they explain bodies in a bog in florida that still had brain matter in them, and it is said the dna was caucasian. And the mounds here and mounds in ireland etc. History is not what we think it is. And what about these red haired giants with six toes and six fingers of which it was said at least one was killed in afghanistan. It was apparently killing and eating people for a long time there and it killed apparently some u.s. soldiers. Then others were sent there and they killed it. I have heard story's of indians apparently waging a battle against giants in the u.s. and giant skeletons being taken and apparently destroyed. It talks in genesis about giants. And another thing, I have heard of indians having treats with these giants and the giants stayed in certain places, and the Indians avoided them. Makes you wonder what is killing these people in the national parks that dave paulidas talks about. Seems strange these places were designated as national parks in the first place. I also think there may be different kinds of cryptids. Natives talk about skinwalkers and people just laugh. But I think we have to stop thinking inside of a little box and think outside the box. Many people have seen strange things especially in those parks. People try to say " oh it was a bear". I was a hunter and I know a bear when I see one plus they were extremely rare where I am. And those way up north were only black bear. And I doubt there is a black bear between 13-15 ft. I think many hunters have seen the sasquatch but do not say anything because their afraid of ridicule. Btw I know someone who claims to have seen a dogman. I just inquired as to where, so I can avoid that area.
Great book - along with its companion 1493. Both good, but I personally enjoyed 1491 a little more. Guns, Germs & Steel is very good, too. Also Sapiens by Yuval Harari.
I saw an archeological report that indicated that the North American Indigenous that you were speaking of, DISPLACED a whole race of previous occupiers of the North Americas. In other words, they are finding a totally genetically different ancient people who lived here; not related to who we call American Indians.
This is what MOST want to continue lying about, ignoring and hiding. It is not a secret but a cover up by the Smithsonian and other Archaeologists in history. They pushed the narrative that the indigenous Copper Colored peoples that lived in the Americas were savages, had no history, no writings, no pottery, buildings, etc. ALL LIES. They KNOW most lands are our lands and they’re all squatting and stealing. They’ve tried in just about every continent and island to kill us, the indigenous/Copper Colored tribes off or transport us TO Africa and other Islands like Jamaica and Haiti. Most Islanders do not know they come from America. When they couldn’t completely destroy us in the Americas, they reclassified us NUMEROUS times, today calling us “African” American 🙄🙄. The great majority of us are NOT African. DNA tests are SCAMS…and they know that too. Of course we will likely NOT have Asian DNA common to the current people they’ve decided are the “Natives”. How about exhuming some bones found in the mounds across America THEN compare our DNA to that. How about stop lying about and hiding what was found in the mounds. Bet they won’t because they already know what truth is there. The entire point of the United States is to lie, murder and steal. We are indigenous to Turtle Island/Ameru/Ameri. They did this to us to fit their lying azz narratives so they can keep our lands and the minerals. The most truth I’ve seen the United States admit to is Websters dictionary 1828 definition of American. Look it up, then look up Copper Colored…it ain’t no white person nor these Asians over here squatting.
I just watched a Hopi man's interview. He said the Hopi had been on their land forever, but the Navajo came from Alaska. The Hopi had to build their villages on top of mesa's, so they could see attacks coming. Also the farmland in the jungles makes more sense, when you see the pyramids and other ancient ruins there.
Do you know the Hopi religious beliefs? I dont remember where I heard this decades ago, but I think I remember someone saying that they were monotheistic. The Hopi didn't worship spirits like other tribes in that area, but a single creator god.. They also had legends of someone similar to a Messiah or Savior. (I could be completely wrong, so please don't quote me on this.)
@Rick Anglin You lied. The "Navajo" and "Apache" both speak the same language as my mother's family from Alaska, Native speakers say it's like someone from Texas giving directions to someone from Scotland that's asked for a menu. The names for numbers are the same.
@@MissCleo24 The Navajo speak the Athabaskan language, as do the Apache, and the Alaskan Athabaskans are one of the largest private landowners in North America. The Inuit are a minority population that reside above the Arctic Circle, and were previously referred to as Eskimo.
That could explain lost knowledge. I went to a place in Mexico that had been an Indian ruins site. You had to walk up like 50 steps then the land was flat. It was concrete slaps and under there were huge concrete well like huge flower pots. The guide said when they broke some of them open there were ppl in praying postions. It was freaky yet beautiful. I love history and this video is wonderful. All the ppls comments were fantastic and I'm hooked. Everyone seems so educated about this, where have I been?
Wow, I blundered on this by accident. Being a fifth generation Appalachian American from an easily traceable Galloway Scot’s family after I started I was persuaded to go all in for Y-DNA analysis, so I have had an introduction to the capabilities of Y-DNA although I am still working at understanding some of the vocabulary. I now can trace this line back to the 1600s. Anyway, I am hooked already!
Waste of money and time. The so-called experts really don't understand DNA or genetics. Just like everything else, it is all speculation and conjecture by mostly incompetent students and wannabe famous professors. The truth is scientists have been wrong about everything since civilization began. Today there is an intelligence drought in American universities and the DNA testing is just another scam to get your money and personal information.
There were advanced civilizations living in "the states" until the drunken sailors showed up from Europe, disobeyed their Commandments and tried to murder them all.
Fascinating!!! Thank you so much for such important information. I will must definitely look for all your videos. As a woman born in Guatemala, your revelations touch not only my brain, they also touch my heart.
The pyramid shape is a fundamental geometric shape. The circle and the square as well. Just like writing, pyramid shapes can easily be developed in unconnected regions or continents.
They just did a test on a native here in Montana. His ancestors were here for like 30k years. His ancestors talked about how they walked across the ice from Russia to Alaska.
Yeah If you wanna use science to exaggerate the amount of years humans were not here 30 years ago, and if they were those are the people you all are digging up, that was a part of the flood that got washed away in the book of Genesis, so that proves the Bible true, not evolution!
I meant to say 30,000 years ago and those were pre-flood era people, which lines up with biblical history, perfectly not evolution! The more you are trying to disprove the Bible, the more you prove it to be true!
Interestingly in something else I had seen suggested that the first European explorers navigating the Amazon reported encountering large cities along the river. A century later, explorers couldn’t find them and said the previous accounts were not true. I’ve seen some areas in my metro that have fallen into disrepair and became uninhabited, that after 50 years nature will have done a pretty good job of reclaimation as evidenced by just ten years of neglect. Of course the Vikings who visited North America apparently didn’t feel compelled to share iron working secrets with the inhabitants they encountered. I really wonder how much real contact Iron Age societies had with the Americas prior to then.
Europeans carried diseases, notably small pox, that decimated entire tribes of native Americans. It's entirely possible, I'd say probable, those cities were very real & were abandoned due to outbreaks within a month of contact with those early explorers & reclaimed by the jungle. That pattern was seen throughout the western hemisphere & there's no reason to believe South America would fare any different.
As we have come to expèct from answers in genesis, this is an amazing and very informative documentary, that has again broken the stereotypical view of the pre Columbus America's, that paints the lands and the Indian tribes living there in a completely new light, showing again how the mainstream history is as misguided as it ever was. So Thank you for correcting the narrow view of the culture that predated the European influx, it is always a good day when I can go to bed having changed my world view and learned a new dynamic , one that I suspected but had only scant information to rest it upon, allowing me to view the native people's in their true guise, not one imposed upon us from outdated history books and Hollywood tales, but one based upon proper scientific research and unbiased analysis, I cannot wait to carry on along this avenue as this series progresses. Again thank you, and may many honourable spirits of long dead native people's now rest a little easier knowing that their true story has finally begun to leak out into the modern world.
Check out "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee", it's some non-fiction that might give you more than you expect. This isn't a guilt-trip either, you seem respectful, but it's a hard read. Great gift for Columbus Day, though.
After viewing the realities between the left and right of recent times, I come to realize that we will never ever know what really happened in the past.
The world is far smaller than we all think especially in our younger years. I had the blessing of living on both coasts by the time I was 4 and living in Colorado but the time I turned 5. My dad has gone down south for vacation and long lost friends have grabbed him in crowds he hasn’t seen in years and hugged him. It took me 46 hours to drive across the country when I was 21, that was nothing to me then, even less now. Even without cars you can cross great distances with the proper determination and preparation. Some people have walked across the US in just over a month. It’s really not that hard to see just how small the world really is. It seems vast in your mind but when you go out and explore it physically, it’s clear this world is pretty small.
most of the earth is still unexplored according to the data, even with that many people, for every individual it is a very huge and vast place, and in the past it was common for entire armies to walk between countries within a few days, they were stronger and more versatile
@@jafojafo5412 I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Understand what science? Creationist so-called science? Creationists have a monopoly on science and not, say, scientists? False narrative? What narrative and why is it false? Who is is falsifying this narrative that I know nothing about and for what purpose? I smell more conspiracy theories.
It may be true but you weren’t here first. This is what MOST want to continue lying about, ignoring and hiding. It is not a secret but a cover up by the Smithsonian and other Archaeologists in history. They pushed the narrative that the indigenous Copper Colored peoples that lived in the Americas were savages, had no history, no writings, no pottery, buildings, etc. ALL LIES. They KNOW most lands are our lands and they’re all squatting and stealing. They’ve tried in just about every continent and island to kill us, the indigenous/Copper Colored tribes off or transport us TO Africa and other Islands like Jamaica and Haiti. Most Islanders do not know they come from America. When they couldn’t completely destroy us in the Americas, they reclassified us NUMEROUS times, today calling us “African” American 🙄🙄. The great majority of us are NOT African. DNA tests are SCAMS…and they know that too. Of course we will likely NOT have Asian DNA common to the current people they’ve decided are the “Natives”. How about exhuming some bones found in the mounds across America THEN compare our DNA to that. How about stop lying about and hiding what was found in the mounds. Bet they won’t because they already know what truth is there. The entire point of the United States is to lie, murder and steal. We are indigenous to Turtle Island/Ameru/Ameri. They did this to us to fit their lying azz narratives so they can keep our lands and the minerals. The most truth I’ve seen the United States admit to is Websters dictionary 1828 definition of American. Look it up, then look up Copper Colored…it ain’t no white person nor these Asians over here squatting.
I think the title is somewhat misleading. I expected to listen about the origins of Native Americans, but I listened to the nature of their lives pre-contact instead. Great work though, I enjoyed it, and I'm really thankful for the sources of information being clearly cited, something uncommon on youtube. I hope to see more in the future!
This isn't what I expected. The title has ORIGINAL in all caps, so I thought you'd be discussing who settled North America before the tribes we have today.
You can know for sure where you headed. Bible explains where we are going and where we come from. And you are right. The future will be horrifying. There will be time of 7 years as never was before. All the wars combined together won’t come close to this time. But there’s a way to escape this time of judgment on earth. Those who believe on Jesus Christ and trust Him for their salvation WILL BE SAVED. They will be raptured before the 7 years of Tribulation. Jesus came 2000 some years ago on the rescue mission. And He offers escape from hell through faith in Him. He paid for sins of those who will trust in Him. Once you receive the GIFT/GGRACE YOU WILL BE SAVED It’s so simple Grace is something you don’t deserve You can buy it or earn it, It’s a free gift. Jesus did everything to rescue you from your sins. Will you choose Jesus. Religion won’t save you, people or your own works WONT save you. Just ask Jesus to save you and trust in Him.
It’s getting worse because of lies and the determination of paler skinned people to continually deny the humanity of darker skinned people. I truly believe once the fascination they have with their own skin stops, then peace can begin.
My question is…Who are the $5 Indians. Notice no one ever says I am a descendant of the $5 Indians, but we all know yall bought a nationality for 5 bucks.
Reminds me of the movie “Apocalypto” that has scenes that reflected intense landscape-altering activity by aboriginal people right before the Spanish arrived.
Yes, we've had giants found in my area. One was found at the Lovelock caves and Pyramid Lake. Its pretty crazy to drive by and know what was found there.
As I read when I lived up there, A researcher started digging out in the caves sometime at the turn of the century in the early 1900's and found skulls, and parts of hands. When it was reported, the Smithsonian came out to Lovelock, closed off the area, excavated the entire site and left. No one has seen anything since. And the Smithsonian never mentioned it or displayed it. The Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca has a giant skull (not one of those from the cave) but it is still a giant skull.
yes, cleopatras twins (Helios and Selene) brought the whole family crip over here and reburied them in southern ill, (Alexander the great) cleopatra, mark Anthony, were all reburied here in America :) check out (Harry Hubbard) on RUclips, he has researched this for 25 years :)
@@rmac1199 yeah between the SMITHSONIAN AND THE VATICAN,nothing will be added to,but much will be taken away,we the people know what they are doin,we just are pissed off enough,its coming though,my neighbors are pissed at everything,no conversation ends with low blood pressure
I was once told the history of the Ancient Ones of the Southwest by an elder named Blue Star. She told that after the sky gods left the Central Americas the native peoples did what they could to bring them back. First offerings sacrifice of food and flowers. When that did not work they offered jewels and gold, when that did not work they offered animals, when that did not work they offer human sacrifice. But when it came to offering the very young as sacrifices a huge split happened in the old culture. The ones who believed in sacrifice stayed and the ones who did not believe in killing moved north, in two waves, into what is now the Southwest and Southeastern US and beyond. They may have been part of the mound builders. No matter what was offered, the gods were not allowed to return to Earth.
@@josecoope2211 Although the origins of Egypt and pre-invasion Europe was dark skinned, Cleopatra was Greek. She was of the Ptolemaic dynasties installed by Alexander via Ptolemy I
@@josecoope2211 The Moors got just a paragraph in my high school history books so they don’t really teach that. They don’t teach the good AND the bad the Moors carried out on Europeans either.
I watched a program some years ago, where this man, I believe he was Professor, or Archeologist, he talked about how Native Americans weren't the first peoples to come to North America either. He believes that they came from either Northern Europe, or around France. It was because they found the same type of arrow heads that were being made in Europe at the time. And they predated the ones the Natives were making.
Some North American Indians are larger or/and taller than most Indians of the New World. Has it always been that way or are they the result of mixing with taller northern Europeans ?
The great Italian explorer Giovanni da Verrazzano was the first European to explore what is now the East Coast of the United States. By ship, he sailed up the east coast from Florida to New York. His eyewitness account is found in a 10 page letter he penned to the King of France in 1524 , 100 years before the Pilgrims, stating that ALL of the people he encountered during his voyage of the American east coast were DARK SKINNED with SHORT thick hair. His exact quote is that they look just like Ethiopians!!!!! None of the people who we currently describe as Native Americans (Indians) were ever mentioned!!! He kidnapped a small boy and took him back to France where the boy was looked upon as being AFRICAN!!!!!
I´m portuguese. It's established in our History that we went everywhere in America (From Canada to South Argentina) before Columbus arrived and all was kept a secret, because we had no people to claim it and keep it, but also for another reason. It's somehow established that we made contact and friendship with the South american tribes, that were huge. Millions and millions of people. And unfortunately those contacts originated a terrible consequence that spread like wild fire throughout the entire continent. Small pox, tetanus, syphilis and several other pandemic events went nuclear and wiped almost all the native population that had no defenses. It was terrible and I believe that could be the reason Portugal kept the discovery of America a secret for more than a century. The same happened with the Spanish in Central and North America. As a Christian country that mostly went to the world for commerce (that is proven by the way portuguese interacted with China, Japan, India and most places we went, always with commercial outposts). The death of so many people even if not intended would bring a very heavy burden. I believe the slave trade was actually a way to repopulate after that event.
Another thing to point out: The Norse visited North America around 1000 AD, and the event is recorded in the old Icelandic sagas. They didn't settle there, by the way, due to the hostility of the natives. The interesting thing is that the description of the land and its inhabitants in the Icelandic sagas very much fits with the classical understanding of pre-Columbian America. The explorers from Europe found a land so pristine that at first they thought it was uninhabited. And when they met the locals, they were described as very primitive people. And there does not seem to have been very many of them, at least compared to the abundant resources of the land, even though they could be dangerous enough, due to their unpredictable attacks on the wannabe settlers. Now, let it be said that the Viking descriptions of North America probably relates only to the north east coast. So they don't describe the heartland of the North American native sivilisation.
This is actually helpful for me. I am writting an alternate history/time travel series, and one of the characters is dealing with Texas and mezoamerica in the first century. Good to know more information to help me write correct characters. The series starts with "Earth's Eulogy" and I am about to release book 7 once I get it back from the editor.
I’d love to have a read. Consider the Hermetica, A Book of The Beginnings, Atlantis: The Antediluvian World and Other Worlds - Other Tongues. Kurimeo Ahau is also worth looking into, he has a channel here. Bobby Hemmit, Phil Valentine, and Dr Delbert Blair have plenty of lectures available on their websites, as well as bits and pieces of lectures on RUclips. Mind Unveiled is also a treasure trove for ideas and potential areas of research
There were People here way before The American Indians, or Native Indians! As far as Native people, I was born here and that makes me A Native American as are most of us!
@@rustydogrustydog9191 well for one I didn’t say I was. And two no that’s not not my real name. I don’t have to be to comment. Definitely not Native American
@Apollo Mayaimi If that’s your way of inferring that they where black it’s wrong. And Native Americanis not a political organization. It refers to the native tribes of which most where moved to reservations. They are very much real and still here.
Fascinating! In one episode, you've turned nearly the entirety of what I know and understand to be not only America but also South America on it's ear! I can't wait to see what is in store in episodes to come! I'm an enthusiastic new subscriber..at least!
I learned a long time ago, through researching my family genealogy, that all people are related somewhere in the past...this is shown in the bible. I have compared many family trees and see that many in the south of my state are a descendant of at least a couple of the first French colony in Acadia in 1604. There were 86 family names and I am descended from 80 of them. In researching different people's family trees, I have run across thousands of names also descended from some of those families, even though some of them or their ancestors were never in my birth state, but half way across the country. If we go farther back, it would show that all us are related one way or another, at the least by a common ancestor. 👍
Decades ago, when in my late 20's and early 30's I read a book "The Time Before Columbus" but I've been unable to find it in my 60's and 70's. I can't recall the name but Louis L'Amour wrote about Chinese trading vessels and the west coast nations. And recently a geneticist proved that S.A. natives have Pacific Islander DNA too
There's a argentinian historian by the name of Cristian Rodrigo Uturralde he wrote two books, 1492 fin de la barbarie,am not sure if is possible to get them in english but the documentation is enormous and very helpful for those interested in that period of time.
The simplist approach, that assumes all the native groups were static, and all got along like a big family, is obvliously mistaken. They had warriors, so clearly there were conflicts. Names of places and water, to today, reveil movements. Lake Huron today is surrounded by Ojibwa people, the Huron (Wyndot) left in the 1650's and are now in Nebraska. The lack of written accounts, and deliberate erasure of their history has lead to our current lack of knowledge. Hopefully we can continue to piece it all back together.
I like the theory that we've had 5 civilizations that were wiped out in extinctions. This answers how tools and other artifacts are found in coal and other materials. Gotta wonder how far they went with technology and if that played a part in any or all of the global catastrophes that nearly wiped out all life on earth repeatedly.
The German bloodline is Assyrian and the other European ethnic groups also came from the same general area. So it's no wonder you find central Asian genetics when you go back to that time period. Not only that, but the Mediterranean isn't really much a barrier, it's a highway, so you're going to end up with a lot of intermixing in the genetic code.
When I was in grammar school, some 50 years ago, we were taught that the North American natives actually came from Asia that came to North America by crossing the Bering Straight.
The Smithsonian has collected giant skeletons from Indian Mounds through the Midwest. They now supress any news of this, presumably because it doesn't fit the modern narrative. 💀 ☠️ 💀
Right out of Genesis 6. Look at all the burial mounds all over the eastern states from giant remains that have been confiscated and hidden by the Smithsonian!
Nathaniel, my family genealogy book contains a story about Chief Sitting Bull, He visited my ancestors at their ‘little house on the prairie’ in Dakota Territory. A little girl with orange hair lived there and her presence was requested….no body was harmed. ”This orange hair reminds me of a time of peace between my people and the white men from the north” -Sitting Bull. I’ve told this story many times, since my only child was born a ginger. I choose to believe the Chief was referring to Vikings instead of French fur traders. Ever since facing a junior high lacrosse team from the Onondaga nation, I’ve noticed far too many traces of impressive intellect & wisdom to accept the common view of pre-Colombian N. America. Another read which may help connect some dots is Sapiens, Yuval Noah Harari The recurring theme that rattles in my brain is the question of empires…..Egypt?…..Rome?…..Star Wars? We don’t seem to learn from our mistakes. Perhaps tribal life is not so wrong?
That's not really a good way to think of it. You are inferring inferiority based on one lineage vs another. I don't think their intellect or other attributes tell us much. Those things would exist no matter the lineage. Cultural influences would be a stronger indicator, but I think there were at least 2 major and 1 minor migration into the Americas. 1st came by sea probably 20000 years ago or more. Then there is the traditional migration across the Bering strait that would have happened 15000 years ago. Then we have the later minor migrations of vikings, possibly a lost tribe of Israel, even Jesus may have visited the Americas when he was young and we do not know his location.
@@SamtheIrishexan Sam, thank you for disagreeing, inferiority was not my intent. I was sharing a family story to support the author of this video, regarding the ignorance of the pilgrims, etc. To be clear, my curiosity in pre history is driven mostly by behavior. With the challenges we now face, the well recorded, yet brief 2000 years of western civilization can seem like a giant how-not-to guide. Resources like the library of Alexandria are gone, nobody understands Stonehenge, Easter island, pyramids, etc. We hedonize Hitler, but rarely question the similarly peculiar genocidal behavior of Julius Caesar (battle of Alesia-live free or die) which continues celebration through salad dressing and continued colonialism. This kind of crap seems to happen on every continent, everybody likes to reproduce, DNA migrates. Lineage is the least of my concern. Non-violence seems an impossible goal, because humanity rarely endures without occasional violence. Inevitably, a growing population will naturally face resource scarcity, and resort to violence as conflict resolution. However, I believe the motives matter. Many tribes have used violence to protect vital resources for survival, while the infamous leaders of large empires extract a demented joy from using violence as conquest. Today, political leaders seem to create narratives to motivate violence. Some have died for food & water, and others have died for ideas and ideology. I believe Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse, etc fought for survival, but I’ll forever wonder at General Custer’s last thought.
The secret is in the language. We are all part of the HUMAN race yet come from different tribes from across the lands. Tribalism is not wrong. It is not wrong to prefer your own peoples because different peoples have different views. Yet we need to learn from one another as the human race to progress further. Kindness, wisdom, understanding and morality is key. Celebrate our differences. Because we are the human race. Diverse like the spectrums of light, energy and sound.
As a lay person, I read Gavin Menzies “1421, The Year China Discovered America,” and believe through his analysis that Chinese have travelled around the world and populated civilizations throughout the world. I’ve see through the native Indians, like, American Indians, Mayans, Aztecs, etc..do have Asiatic features. Menzie, through DNA has shown that the Chinese DNA is part of the DNA of native Indians in the new world..
Native Americans have mongoloid DNA not necessarily Chinese and where are the remnants of Chinese culture ? Which native tribe expressed cultural artifacts of their Chinese heritage ?
An Inquiry Into the Distinctive Characteristics of the Aboriginal Race of America by Samuel George Morton It cannot be questioned that physical diversities do occur, equally singular and inexplicable, as seen in different shades of color, varying from a fair tint to a complexion almost black; and this too under circumstances in which climate can have little or no influence. So also in reference to stature, the differences are remarkable in entire tribes which, more over, are geographically proximate to each other. These facts, however, are mere exceptions to a general rule, and do not alter the peculiar physiognomy of the Indian, which is as undeviatingly characteristic as that of the Negro; for whether we see him in the athletic Charib or the stunted Chayma, in the dark Californian or the fair Borroa, he is an Indian still.
@@mikejones-wn1sw The natives of America were dark-skinned people described by Columbus as copper coloured and he described as the negros as they remain to be because they're still there they changed their status from Aboriginal, to coloured, Afro Americans to African Americans hence by so called accident the Census building holding the information burnt down. There's lots of information out there to say the indigenous were enslaved in their own land and transported out to the other side of America where planters were required. Some natives bought other tribes.
Central Asia does not mean Oriental/Mongoloid. The Indo Europeans came from Central Asia 3500 BC. Many other Caucasian groups also began in Central Asia, or Eurasia; the Slavs, the Goths, the Turks, the Bulgars, Sarmatians, etc...
Central Asia is a pretty vague term like Siberia: which Siberia? The broad term like western people might use in casual conversation or the more specific administrative term? More of a rule of thumb than something helpful to research if you ask me.
Do you know why the turtle myth shows up in these three cultures. The myth of a giant turtle or tortoise supporting or containing the world occurs in Hindu mythology, in Chinese mythology and in Native American mythology.
@@sm-hi7jt I wrote it because all myths are related. Those lands are the lands that Alexander the Great was not allowed to conquer. He died after attacking India. The elephants holding the turtle world is the unconquered world.
Hi, I find this so intersting. Reminds me of the permaculture movement that for 50 years aprox have been doing this. Also reminding of Canadas woodlands that contained all foods and was preserved like you mentioned like a sofisticated park. Thanks for closing the gap in historie were this ancient highly productive farming was "forgotten".
The people who were here where black people they were the Indians historians don't want to admit it but the original that inhabited this land we're black
@@garystewart5443 haha you know whites were in the middle east to begin with and got killed off. That is why alot of afghans have blue eyes. and NO Jesus was not black either. White flight and White death
Wow, some of these views fly in the face of the norm and ideologies of ANSWERS IN GENESIS and yet they had this interview and discussion and posted this video. Bravo ! This is how we gain knowledge. Ken Ham's face was priceless, when Dr. Jeanson said "That doesn't account for the 100,000 years of human life ".
That's neat. Growing up we lived on an inland river that had clay cliffs full of shell fossils. We often found shark teeth. Once when we were traveling throught the mountains of Tennessee, we went swimming in a murky lake and found shell fossils there too.
You might want to follow SuspiciousObservers channel and view his playlists. It looks like the sun catestrophically erupted about 12,000 years ago and the crust of the earth broke free of the mantle. The seas overtopped the Rockies coming from the west. You would enjoy
I live in SW Virginia, near Wythe County. Back in the 60's-70's, when Interstate 77 was being constructed, @ The Tunnel, a primitive village was un-earthed, and later was carbon-dated to be 14,000-16,000 years old. This beats Egypt, the reconized beginning of our current civilization by some 11,000-13,000 years. Seems like Hominids have been scampering about, all around the globe even earlier than that. We can talk until we "turn blue in the face", but tomorrow, next week, next year, another "find" will surpass our previous conjecture about "Who was on First?" I don't know. "No, he was on Second!" (see; Abbott & Costello).
@@brianjones7660 yes. if you peel off I-77 onto Rocky Gap exit, it's just short hop. Used to have small visitor center/ shop. I haven't been there in ten+ yrs, don't know if it still there. check Va Tech website, they did a lot of research. Newspapers/T.V. had occasional stories. Road built circa mid-60's. Stories pertinent 70/80's, some linger. Dig was estimated 12,000-14,000 yr ago.(even prior to Beiring Straits, Alaska land-crossing)
I'm 40, and the idea that we were only taught the European version is true because that is what the testing was based upon. That's why we skipped chapters. Me being inquisitive and of Taino ancestry, I would always search through those chapters, and there we were. You always just need to dig deeper. As far as this subject matter, all lands were conquered and lost throughout history. However, it's ignorance to say the indigenous as we know them were the inhabitants when the first Europeans arrived
The generational aspect is fascinating. I was an only child and I don't have contact with my only male first cousin on my father's side to do the paternal DNA. What's interesting is my father's family were nobility going back 400 years. This is verified. My grandfather was the last title holder. As such, they had access to women from distant communities. The interesting part is that my father's family immigrated to the US when he was a child. My mother was born in the US but her parents come from two communities that face each other across a river but met in the US. They were not nobility but they were prosperous so they weren't limited to marrying within their communities. Bot of these communities are actually not that far geographically from my father's birth place. In light of the info Dr. Jeanson has presented, one has to wonder if there might not be some connection between both sides of my family going back generations.
The history of the native people where I live say the first people came here in boats and lived on the mountain tops. Archeology has verified this because the oldest artifacts are stone points found at high altitude all along the cascade range.
Very interesting, Would love to hear your views on Nephilim and giants and pre-Flood America. After all numerous giant remains have been discovered, which have disappeared into the Smithsonian Museum, never to be seen again.
The Nephilim were simply human giants. They aren’t half angel half man. The modern Bibles just don’t translate the word. For some reason they transliterated it. But the KJV (the perfect and preserved Bible in English) says Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
@@SB-zl7mm there are no such people as native americans....they all came from some other continent during different ice ages and continental events.....anyone who calls the Sioux native americans is grossly uninformed as you appear to be!!!!!!!
@@SB-zl7mm Books have been removed when the King James version was mass printed for the Catholic church. The book of Enoch has been found, predates the King James version. Its only complete extant version is an Ethiopic translation of a Greek translation made in Palestine from the original Hebrew or Aramaic. It references other biblical documents and is also referenced by scripture. The information in the book of Enoch speaks to the Nephelim, the origin of the fallen angels, and how they corrupted the flesh of men and beast of the earth. this is why the flood happened, because of the corruption of Human DNA.
@@TimeDagar The Anglican Church was established in 1534 by King Henry VIII. The King James Bible was published in 1611 for the Anglican Church, not for the Catholic Church. The Apocrypha is ancient folktales. The Catholic Church added them to what they called the canon. But Jews never had the Apocrypha in their Torah. And Bible-believing Christians throughout the ages didn’t use the Apocrypha either. The KJV translators translated the Apocrypha but they wrote clearly at the top of each page, “This is the Apocrypha.” They did that because they knew it wasn’t holy scripture. Angels can’t reproduce even with other angels. They certainly can’t reproduce with mankind. Matthew 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.
Very fascinating! Human beings develop the land on which they live, since day one. It has been recently shown that a knowledgeable man, who understands the land, can transform a barren wasteland into a garden paradise in less than 5 yrs. See Geoff Lawton (Greening the Desert) for details. There is nothing new under the sun, where there is a man, there is development of the land, for good or for evil. We are all one blood, decidedly human.♥️
This makes me think of the guy on Ted talk that admitted they culled a bunch of animals somewhere in Africa cuz they thought they were destroying the land and the land got worse, they then realized the giant herds were actually necessary to keep things growing, we needed the dung of animals and their natural deaths to help things grow and if you remove the animals, the land dies.
Thank you so much! This changed my whole perspective of the Native American way of life. What an impressive set of cultures, and 115 million people! I do hope that this get taught in schools. We were taught the whole Dances With Wolves concept in school. This is a much more encouraging perspective based on actual research :)
What "actual research"? They made some assumptions, and then extrapolated the assumed population from one area onto the larger subcontinent. That's like taking the population density of New York City, and from that, extrapolating the population of the United States. That's not research. That's projecting assumptions. The other thing to note is that Jeanson implies that Europeans first inhabited the Americas from 1492. Nope. Columbus didn't leave any European settlers. The fact is that Columbus never set foot in what would become North America. Jeanson is a fast talker. However, he is not an anthropological geneticist.
@@frankmartin8471 to assume that all Native American cultures lived in Stone Age conditions is false. That is the premise he presents. Who cares about the precise numbers? The fact that they did not live in harmony with nature as we are led to believe based on a glimpse of a collapsed culture long after their peak due to disease makes a lot more sense than a poor nomadic set of cultures being hurried out of existence by evil white men. And nowhere does he say that Columbus himself set foot in North American or left colonists. I think you’re drinking too much of the historical cool aid.
@@frankmartin8471 lol exactly we know that there are tons of unlivable areas of America like idk...death valley, freezing cold areas, where humans couldn't possibly live then (even with heating A/C they can barely live there today!) comparing the population to a higily livable booming state is so backwards. Just like Mezoamerica had 100x the population of the US cause of how it was built, US had sparer population based on the land and stratification of cultures...this is common sense but not common to most people.
@@samaraisnt -- But we do know that people lived in the Grand Canyon, place we now think of as inhabitable. But we don't know why the disappeared leaving most of their belongings behind.
But not lied about. Not fabricated. Europens have recesdive genes. Dont start another lie. The truth of TMH unfolds every day.. you can not lie, twist, write, escavate, a lie.
Very interesting info and food for thought ….makes me wonder and think more on the history of all our ancient civilizations and cultures, and what is it we’re missing about our ancestors and their abilities with the building of monuments and other structures, and/or how they did things with only primitive tools. I for one believe that our ancestors had knowledge more capable and that it somehow was destroyed through natural disasters and warfare, slipping by our current understanding of human history. I truly believe there is more to this story of human history than what we assume it to be. What is now known are only bits and pieces of a larger picture and a puzzle for us to solve. 👍👍👍👍👍🖖
Mainstream Human history bears little resemblance to what we are taught the Smithsonian for instance dumped a barge of thousands of artifacts from the Americas that didn't go with their narrative into the ocean that is documented and fact bones of giants and Technology we couldn't even fathom the people of Earth were technologically advanced all you have to do is look at any megalithic construction that we cannot reproduce today their structures used multi-ton block with no mortar because they had perfect cuts in multi angles that made them earthquake proof we cannot reproduce today look at the stone of the pregnant woman in Turkey one block thousands of tons we don't have equipment that's able to lift it but they would have you believe humans did it with hemp rope and slave power and an elephant or two our largest cranes would need five or more just to lift it and then we couldn't move it or place it with Precision like they did
No one did anything but primitivity with primative tools. Obviously. Only time can lead to such creativity. More time existed before ancient egypt than since its end.
gobekli tepe Pre dates Egypt and was an extremely advanced settlement. Our ancestors were not primitive they were working granite thousands of years ago.
My ancestors Have Always Been Told part of our family came across the Bering Strait in Alaska that came straight across from Asia and Egypt that's a tribal thing that has been told from my native side
Answers in Genesis, hi. Thanks for making all of this! Can you start numbering your episodes? Say 'Subject C Part 2 of 6', so we can watch a series of episodes. Plus in it's intended order? We can detain so much more information if it's not bits and pieces here and there over a course of several years. A numbering system would really improve our learning experience. Perhaps you can even make a video with some sort of a chart of what order is good to follow in studying this. Then one can build upon knowledge given in previous episodes. Hope you read this.
An Inquiry Into the Distinctive Characteristics of the Aboriginal Race of America by Samuel George Morton It cannot be questioned that physical diversities do occur, equally singular and inexplicable, as seen in different shades of color, varying from a fair tint to a complexion almost black; and this too under circumstances in which climate can have little or no influence. So also in reference to stature, the differences are remarkable in entire tribes which, more over, are geographically proximate to each other. These facts, however, are mere exceptions to a general rule, and do not alter the peculiar physiognomy of the Indian, which is as undeviatingly characteristic as that of the Negro; for whether we see him in the athletic Charib or the stunted Chayma, in the dark Californian or the fair Borroa, he is an Indian still.
I think this was episode 11,but he didn't say it until he very end,he said look forward to episode 12 ,I also like looking at things in sequence,it's easier to see the bigger picture
@@mikejones-wn1sw we don't have different races because of environmental reasons like weather and diet we have different races because of different admixtures. White people are mixed with Neanderthal Asians with neanderthals and denisovans Africans with an admixture we know little about etc etc. I can assure everybody if East Asians and Nigerians switch countries in a million years the ancestors of the East Asians will not evolve into Africans and the ancestors of the indigenous Nigerians will not evolve into East Asians because of environmental reasons like weather and diet. Again we have different races because of different admixtures Yes organisms evolve but they evolve quite rapidly. For example people living under atheistic humanist equity North Korea are three inches shorter than their genetic counterpart in South Korea do to malnourishment . The North Koreans didn't evolve into a different species or race than the South Koreans they simply didn't grow to the same potential because of malnourishment. Matter of fact the average Korean today is 10 in taller than their forefathers 100 years ago. If you take the North Koreans today what's 3 in shorter than the genetic counterpart in South Korea and you put them with the South Koreans one-generation Bill be indistinguishable from the south Koreans again because they didn't evolve into a different species or race they simply didn't receive the same about the nourishment which stunted their growth. I don't think out-of-africa sounds logical I think into Africa sounds more logical of course I'm not married to that idea. But if we all originated from Africa we would share the same archaic DNA as today's Africans and we don't. Matter-of-fact Africans also have some Neanderthal DNA and we know that neanderthals didn't come from Africa so it makes the idea of into Africa seem much more likely.
@@garlandantichristian I can definitely grasp that. That is simply my point as to why we are not africans. We do not come from that land. We have always been in the America's. Very odd that the world including africans press their identity hard upon us like they do
A friend of mine was born to a family whose members and relatives were all blond and blue eyed, except her. Her dark brown almond eyes, jet black hair and darkened skin caused all sorts of commotion at her birth. Mother was accused of adultery and divorce proceedings were almost underway until one aunt, the family geneologist announced that the girl's long forgotten great grandfather met and married a beautiful native woman when he was stationed in India when he served as an officer for the British Impirial Forces The couple returned to England and lived out their lives together. My friend did not display 50 or 25 or 13 percent of her great grand mother's genetic material. Human genetics does not play by the roughly calculated arithmetic of Mendel's peas. DNA is far more complicated and fasicnating than that.
A genetic 'atavism'?
This is very interesting. If DNA holds true to its particular intricacies, we should all sire black children soon or in the future. I used to believe if we all looked the same. Eyes, skin color, hair there would be less prejudice. I was wrong. Humans are so flawed, we would find something to NOT love our neighbor. We can be so great and likewise so evil. The human species works against nature.
To C. Berg. - Ativism is more widespread. We just dont report on it.
@@cburg6383 Yeah, probably a good description, short order version atavism in her case where inheritable attributes are not diluted but kept relatively intact somehow isolate from the blond blue eye sequences.
My brother has reddish hair, no-one else in the family. I suspect the red is due to our distant Scottish/Irish heritage. Mendel only dealt with 2-3 characteristics, the human genome is much more complex and surprising than that.
I always say genetics seems like a roll of the dice.
General traits categorically are known by geneticist to be able to skip generations. Additionally, there are recessive genes and dominant genes. Generally in the past 200 years they have flipped the factual script on what is dominant. Although it is obvious they decided to create untruths.
A native girl around 1900 recorded her tribe's oral history in a book. She speaks of very tall red haired people that were here when her tribe arrived on the continent long ago.
Who was that? And what is the name of her writings?
Sources, or else stop the nonsense.
@@PlanetRockJesus Her name was Sarah Winnemucca. She was the daughter of a Paiute chief. Many people challenge her account but I see no reason why she would feel the need to lie about something like that.
Squatch is your answer
@@jdsheleg8332 Yep, really true. Indians weren't the first in the WHOLE of America (includes Canada too).
Where and when i grew up as a child, there was a lot of strip mining going on then, and my father would tell me of how beautiful the land where we lived once was when he grew up there. We were taught in school that the land would never recover in our life time because strip mining destroys it, and it would take hundred of years before vegetation would return.
By the time I was 30, those lands looked much better, and now that I'm in my 60s, I have to tell younger people (much to they're astonishment) how it looked when i was a child.
People with agendas LIE.
Sometime out of ignorance, and sometimes out of purpose.
God's creation is changing continually. We can't kill it. We only change it for a moment.
Have you ever heard the song "Paradise" by John Prine?
It still wouldn't be as it was before the mine tho.
Your logic is rather flawed here
@@kp-legacy-5477 what about if the land was in a volcanic area,would you sat the same thing after lava has inundated previously forested land.
The thing is wether man made or nature made,the earth continues to evolve.
@@kp-legacy-5477 nothing is ever the same as it was in the past. Nature changes things all on it's own. A human lifetime is insignificant on a geological timescale. All of human history is. And the only reason nature matters AT ALL is because Humans are here to experience and observe it.
@@kp-legacy-5477When did they ever mention, returning to its original state? How would anyone living have an original state account? Impossible.
My great grandmother was a New Hampshire Native American, possibly “Abnaki”; great grandfather (Reed) was Scottish. My mother and a couple brothers could have played the “native” roll in cowboy Indian movies. My grandfather passed as Scottish. I was stationed in Japan (marine) in the early fifties and my Japanese crew brought me a photograph of a Japanese boy who looked like me, spitting image!
My dna says I’m 80% European, 17% Native American and, get this, 3% sub Saharan African. I’ve got it covered!
People who use to work for 23 and me said that the tests were not right,so you could be 80 african,17percent native and 3percent European.they do DNA test just like they did with history and the population numbers.
Genealogy tests aren't accurate.
That's spelled Abenaki.
@@Flamelit that explains why my whole family's DNA matches our genealogy going back to the 1400s except one daughter who did hers with 23 and Me. The rest of us are UK and Scandinavia and hers claims she's got a lot of Sub-Saharan African. Seems mighty impossible considering the family history, the shape if her facial features, and her pale skin, light red hair and million freckles. I think they're trying to rewrite our family history.
Japanese are mixture of aboriginal Japanese (who looked like aboriginal Australians) and Far East Asians who came in 2000 years ago into Japanese islands. Most aboriginals were wiped out by new comers, but there were still some blood mixing.
Has anyone else noticed how dark native Americans were back in those pictures compared to how light they are today. It’s a dramatic change
Thats cuz they are now very mixed. There are no fullbloods now.
Due mostly I suspect, to photographs being white/grey/black back then (ie. as in 'black and white' photographs)
Stop it you know deep down inside you know the answer there's no complaints about natives receiving reparations because most of them are white... looking like Sally Field
Outdoors living my friend. Nothing else. Just look at a Caucasian farmer compared to a bureaucrat in the office.
Very interesting 🤔
More than a few years ago, the TV program, 60 Minutes produced a segment on the earliest Americans. What the program said was that the people we think of as native Americans actually came from somewhere else and were not the real "native Americans." It was really interesting and well worth trying to find on RUclips.
Well of course, they came from Mongolia.
It’s true. People fled Jerusalem and came over here and brought the records. Some ran south of Jerusalem and took their writing with them too. The ones who ran south had the Dead Sea scrolls. The ones who came here their record was found in NY. They were on metal plates.
@@shirleypaslay2019 What metal plates ?
Where are they ?
Why are they NOT part of historical record?
And WTH do plates prove anyway ?
@@caryfrancis7412 I think she is referring to Joseph Smith's alleged discovery of those dubious metal plates. And you are right.
Christopher Columbus mentioned "copper-colored people" when he arrived. You know, what color copper is, right?
Columbus never made it to what we now call "North America" - "He was the first European to sight the Bahamas archipelago and then the island later named Hispaniola, now split into Haiti and the Dominican Republic. On his subsequent voyages he went farther south, to Central and South America. He never got close to what is now called the United States"
Also had a Moor as his navigator because he had charts because he had been here before and his ancestors were here in 1400s.
I was recently reading some information about the Chickasaw people of Western Tennessee and the Northern Mississippi and Alabama area. The Chickasaw have a "world wide" flood story that tells of a world wide flood that took place years ago and only one family survived with a pair of each kind of animal. There's was no mention of an Ark in the version that I read about, but it was still very similar to the biblical account. It's amazing to find similar flood stories around the world.
Leif Erikson was the son of Erik the Red, founder of the first European settlement on what is now called Greenland. Born in Iceland around A.D. 970, Erikson sailed to Norway around A.D. 1000.
Erikson sailed off course on his way back to Greenland and landed on the North American continent, where he explored a region he called Vinland. He may also have sought out Vinland based on stories of an earlier voyage by an Icelandic trader. After spending the winter in Vinland. He is believed to be the first European to reach the North American continent, nearly four centuries before Christopher Columbus arrived in 1492.
He landed in Newfoundland, Canada
Their settlements are still there. When asked where the vikings went, the natives people said they went underground.
😂...you know the Inuit have been there ...for like 100's of years before
@@omarsilva5385 In three waves with the currnt group arriving last.
Columbus arrived in the West Indies, no evidence that he lands on N.America at all.
Perhaps it is convenient to refer to Columbus, rather than Leif Erikson hundreds of years before, especially if that landing is in northern Canada, rather than current USA, or John Cabot, who actually did land in N.America, but again in modern day Canada.
It may be a good idea with history, to actually TRY to be factual not political. The vast majority of history is yet to be uncovered, we shouldn't be so arrogant that we "know" it. It you have ten pieces of a 10,000 piece puzzle, you don't really know the full picture.
@@r.b.l.5841 i know what is factual...none of these men founded anything. It was already found
I'm chuckling. On a much smaller time scale, new people to corporations always think nothing good existed before they showed up and they're there to enlighten those who've been there all along. This is incredible information and has the qualification of enticing modern man to think very differently about our Earth, what has been and what can be. We are so easily distracted. Thanks for sharing!!
also so easily convinced we are smarter than the previous peoples.
Garbage trash
@@grassroot011 and you're not
New people anyplace, especially young people, can’t imagine how anything existed successfully before them.
We think that because that's what our schools tell us. We're all brainwashed from a very young age.
It all sounds well and good, but please don't forget that all of these books are just the opinion of the writers. the older I get the more I realise that most writers are just good Story tellers! I often wonder how much is really fact!
Yeah anything to do with ancient history is questionable. A lot of assumptions and coming to conclusions that aren’t really justifiable.
Anything past 6000 years in just conjecture.
That’s what history is around 80% narrative 20% Truth
They have been found Celtic markings all over the United States!
I believe there were many types of people in America, but the Government refuses to allow us to know the truth, especially if it could prove that Christianity was true!
Well if it wasn't them. So what, them were there before white man. Or because of this research and them weren't the first justifys what the white man did in the genocide of many distinct native culture's. That most probably did not refer to themselves as so called Americans.
I am Lakota. My ancestors killed Custer.
😂
He got a few of them too
I teach 7th-12th history. I had my students examine the facial features of the Mongolians and Chinese vs. groups of Native Americans along the west coast, as well as examining the "Great Wall" of California. We also looked at similarities between the Maya/Inca/Aztec culture and Egyptian culture. My hope is that it widened their view of history to see the broader story.
If they haven't been compartmentalized,yet....this is not updated news..it should be common knowledge though....
@@JosephDVines I am working on not compartmentalizing them. Thankfully I teach at a private Christian school where I can teach real history. They don't teach this in public schools at all, and only through self-education have I been able to broaden my horizons to the truth. I'm responsible for every student's history education from 7th grade through seniors, so I have a responsibility to teach the truth.
@@christinag.7801 maybe since its private,take the Children to see it for Themselves,not a better teaching tool,than hands on..
@smasher great dialogue, jump straight to forcing an extreme view on those you disagree with.
Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime stories?
The Vikings made landfall on North America way before Columbus bumped into Hispaniola, Columbus made landfall in the America's, and St. Brendan The Voyager from Ireland most likely discovered North America before the Vikings came. From his own writings.
Columbus knew the Islands where there and he knew to go below the Sargasso sea from other Portuguese that had been there before. The story taught about Columbus was a made up story by a story writer, Washington Irving. Columbus never landed on North America.
Yeah and on the west coast Asians were there first they ran to the people already here
The Chinese were trading with the North Western Indians 3000 years ago.
Nobody from Europe discovered America lol. It was discovered by the people who settled it first smh.
Leif Erickson was the first European born in North America. He later found Martha's Vineyard. And traveled up New England rivers to the Great lakes
Many years ago I found a book in an antique shop. It was written by one of the earliest missionaries who came to the USA from Europe - in the 14th and 15th centuries. The missionary tells how the Odawa chiefs claimed that when they first came to Michigan there were other people already living here (I am from Michigan). The chiefs laughingly bragged that they killed them all and took over the land. Sadly I loaned the book to a special friend who has passed away and her children do not know what happened to the book. But this information is such an important fit into what you are now discussing.
What was the book called?
@@VndNvwYvvSvvmin
Missionaries lied a lot. Their entire goal was to spread propoganda against d others and for their own. Need real hard proof. DNA, physical evidences, bloodline etc.
Their whole goal was ethnocide and brainwashing of d natives. Heck, church tried to claim Hakenkreuz as swastika to blame d Hindus for their connections with Hitler. They provided him with everything, they were d first ones to give him legitimacy and make treaties. Even today missionaries do some dark deeds. Stole entire lands/kingdoms from d natives, Hawaii for ex.
They’re d worst of human kind. Don’t even get started on warring and inquisitions. 😒
There was no USA before XVIII c. - but what do I know?
But injuns lived in peace before Europeans arrived
If you read Alan Eckart's WIlderness War series, you have a book called WIlderness War. It was about observations General Washington's men made when he split half his northern army towards the end of the war and chased "the savages" out of upstate, NY. Eckert's works are highly documented in the back of his book with depositions, journals, diarys, letters, etc. Washington's men found pools of fish hatcheries, orchards, extensive farming, and a high degree of agriculture.
His books are great. Most academics hate them because he wasn’t part of academia. But his novels are meticulously sourced.
Do people forget the aztecs, mayans and incans are native americans? I think it speaks more to how people view the native groups of both since technically us native south americans still exist we are just called latino now where as most north natives were genocided
@@tlaloqq It wasn't genocide, genocide implies intent. The damage done by small pox was what destroyed populations before Europeans arrived. There was plenty of war fare, and Europeans certainly took advantage of tribal disputes to benefit themsleves.
That said, i home school my daughter. I've made it a point when talking about history to discuss the differences between the various native groups here in the Americas. How the Nahua tribes that weren't part of the Aztec Triple alliance sided with the Spanish, intermarried, and created the Mestiso (mestizo? not sure on spelling). How many of south American tribes still exist in numbers higher than those in the US.
I live in Arizona and travel through reservations multiple times a year. The Navajo have their own soda brand (Navajo Fizz) that is, hands down, the best soda i've ever had. All natural ingredients (with the exception of the sassparilla flavoring in the Root Beer).
@Kilthan2050
It was Genocide. Smallpox was used as a bio weapon. Before you respond, look up 1st Bio weapons used.
@@shyquildurham9695 so.. they didn’t understand how germs spread, but knew it was in blankets that they were trading?
The first bio-weapons far predate the colonization. Mongols would launch dead animals into cities to spread disease, it was believes diseases spread through bad air and corpses produced bad air. This was the Miasma theory which held sway until the mid 1800’s
The earliest dates i can find for the intentional use of small pox as a bio-weapon were in the revolutionary war. This is 200 years AFTER the introduction of smallpox to the Americas by the first waves of explorers and settlers. Thats assuming they hadn’t already encountered and been ravaged by the disease from the Viking landings.
Consider the pilgrims. Tisquantum (Squanto) was the last of his tribe, the rest having died of disease, likely small pox, before the pilgrims arrived in 1620.
There is a determination to make the settlers more evil than they were, which is rich considering the native practices of ritual torture followed by cannibalism practiced by many tribes, including the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois).
By the time Europeans tried to use it as a bio weapon it had already done its damage. The population was already decimated, worse than decimated which implies 1 of every 10.
If it is genocide by negligence, then the Natives are guilty of actual intentional genocide, per their own records having wiped out multiple groups and driven some to live in caves.
The focus on the tragedy of the past without regard for the future is part of what holds many on the reservations back. They need to look forward.
I drive cross country multiple times a year. I pass through the Navajo Nation. They sell the BEST soda i’ve ever had. Made from all natural ingredients that they grow. they have made something wonderful. This the path forward. They have taken their care of their land and traditions and used it to make something great. Navajo Fizz is delicious, and i recommend anyone who foes through their land to buy some. I hope they expand and start selling it either online or in stores. They could use it create a lot of good for their people. And i hope they do.
The real Seminole Indians never gave up, and never were relocated to a reservation
The real " Seminole" ( which means runaway in Cherokee) were originally a make up of a few tribes that were sent to reservations in Oklahoma. The Indians that broke free or weren't rounded up were runaways " Seminoles" where they ran south to Florida being hunted down. Until the American Civil War came along which saved these Indians from being rounded up or killed. After the Civil war, US Army left them alone not to cause trouble in the south plus these Indians were now in the swamps and met up with other local Indians and were hiding pretty well. Later on they became the Seminole Tribe, which didn't exist in Florida until they ran down to it.
@Mr. Naughty Pants interesting that they went south to be free... not north. The south was always about freedom.
@@pooppy87 except for that pesky slavery thing.
@@davegink9222 didnt the native Americans forced on the trail of tears..take their slaves with them? Even freed slaves that were rich enough would buy slaves. Huge mess
@@claudeyaz to give them better life and free them. Lots of people like to twist the narrative.
At roughly 21:40 there is an assertion that there was an over 100 year gap between Columbus arriving in 1492 and the beginning of history in America in 1620 with the arrival of the Pilgrims. That glosses over the establishment of St. Augustine in what is now Florida by Spain in 1565 , Roanoke by the English in 1587 and Jamestown in what is now Virginia in 1607.
73years…
Plus, there’s that whole 1619 project Nonsense.
And the attempted establishment of a colony just before St augustine by Spain in the Pensacola FL area that was wiped out by hurricane.
Exactly
Pensacola
I was adopted, and when I studied both the genealogy of my biological and adoptive families, I discovered that my adoptive mother was my distant cousin by a marriage between our distant cousins.
Your you're own grandad...
Alabama reference 💀
Well when there are only 25 last names in what used to be in the county phone book.
My Aunt Pearl married with a man that had grandma's maiden name. 3rd cousins.
There are as many people living in that county today as were there in 1900.
BUT what really surprises me is my younger sister looks like a Cherokee.
I'm from North Carolina and my paternal heritage in America goes back to the early 1600's in North America. My great .... great grandfather (Irish) married my great ... great grandmother, who was a Native American and they lived in the Five Nations Territory as documented in the National Archives. My father always spoke about and showed me Indian Culture and history. The Native American map you showed would put us in the Catawba area. My dad was always pointing out Indian names that I am familiar with in the Southeastern United States.
Thank you for this video.
Growing up in Minnesota back in the 60s and 70s , I learned to keep the sites of real giants we found while hunting or foraging needed to be kept secret. There are also other things in the woods that shouldn't be there but are and I'm not talking about crashed UFOs only. 🏆😁
And whatever you do, you do not tell the government.
Ojibway people know,have known......
There's NEVER been a Crashed UFO ! 🛸 they don't Exist!
Responding to your comment about, ( There are also other things in the woods that shouldn't be there but are.) I live in Maine and I have seen only twice in my life. A large black cat with long hair and a long tail. It shouldn't exist according to wildlife experts. We have no record of such a thing. I was snowmobiling with a friend who has seen 4 of them throughout his life. We stopped on a new logging road and in 3 leaps crossed the road in front of us about 100 yards. This thing must have weighed 100 to 150 pounds. We both seen it and that was my first time. My buddy said he seen them before and he called it a black cat. It didn't have short hair but long hair. Anyway it was very interesting and I'd love to get a picture of one to prove it exists.
Minnesota is the land of giants- LeSeuer especially. The whole valley there. They are green. Jolly, too. We need to use technology to scan the hills there to detect grave sites with giant bones.
Amazing. Open and honest discussion like this should be standard learning procedures. Keep the videos coming.
He’s lying. There’s zero physical proof. Where’s d dna or physical proof??
Most don't say this same thing when some darker skinned people make this claim. They seem to become real byist real fast.
im sorry but europeans do not have a great track record at being honest.
there was no honesty here. He lied about what paradigm the evidence supports. It doesn't support a young Earth. Notice that Jeanson dishonestly picks and chooses which science he accepts - he says carbon dating is reliable when it suits him, but as soon as carbon dating shows that his religious book is wrong, he rejects it - with absolutely no reason offered.
Even the way he presented this video is dishonest. He's trying to claim the evidence agrees with his religious belief - but the stereotypes he talks about are the product of western Christian assumptions about history that derived from the Bible. When he says it's a surprise to find out that pre columbian Americans had a thriving and diverse civilisation - that's because White Christians insisted it wasn't possible. It's secular science that has proven otherwise.
This is the first time I've come to this channel, and so far all the descriptions of how the Americas used to be check out. When farmers clearing land in the Amazon kept finding substantial earthworks grown over by the jungle, it became obvious there used to be more people there. People have since been mapping the ground under the forest canopy with lasers from above, demonstrating widespread habitation. The black earth is replicated by "biochar", or charcoal infused with microbes fed by rich nutrients like urine and flour, that makes plants very healthy.
I'll hear what you have to say next.
Yes the genocide of the Native Americans Is THE largest genocide in history !
I am fascinated with the LIDAR work going on in South America. I really wish there were more of an effort to make TV, documentaries, something.. some way to watch & keep up with it.
Like areas kept poor and desolate, take part of Nebraska for one example. They aren't digging or plowing or anything all those bizarre rolling mounds, hills, bluffs and steppes. I dunno about anyone else but it feels electric in certain parts, how better to hide things then to make it almost unbearable to breathe there....
Why do you think they manipulate our food industry?? To only allow the worst practices and enforce ridiculous rules. Run good people off their land, bring in more profit driven controlled idiots to be in charge. Do you know why we don't get stickers on meat telling us where it came from.. why do they regulate seeds why are they not allowing small farms to thrive??
"used to be more people there". - so how do you calculate the population from the earthworks? for example how do you know they didn't just move to different locations over time?
I'm not sure who doesn't understand we are ALL one people, just different shades of brown. I'm 60 and have been taught that all my life., I'm "white" btw. When I did my first DNA test I was thrilled to see what I already knew there on paper. I embrace all my heritage!
I read 1491 about ten years ago and found it fascinating and interesting that the Indian tribes were terraforming the area long before Columbus. The blaze of color in the fall leaves was in many parts of the northeast an actual blazing fire or fires set by the tribes to remove the understory of brush and invasive plants and create new growth of grasses to encourage the herds of animals to grow nearby.
I read that same book!!!
Me too. In a US history class. Btw, the reason California keeps having wildfires that are so hard to control is that they've banned those essential controlled burns that the people did long before Europeans came.
@@echofoxtrot2.051 But, but, but, but, but, no, its the global warming. Uh, wait a minute, yeah? Oh! The global climate change. Wait, what now?
Oh, ok, I see.
Its the man made gl-
What now?
Fine.
Its the human caused climate change, but not from all humans. The uber rich people's jet fuel and giant vehicles aren't as bad as the regular cars the commoners use.
How dare you cause forest fires with your going to work and moving around the world somewhat freely!
And?
like one fishing tribe only?
I am a 67 year old male in the US only second generation here in the states . Wile growing up I was told I had Scottish blood from my mother's father ,her mother was said to be Polish and German.My father's parents were both Italian. At 63 I had taken the 23 and me testing and through my father I am 50 % Italian but on my mother's side my grandfather was not Scottish at all he was English , Irish , and Scandinavian...Now my mother's mother had no less than some 41 nationalities starting from north west Africa up through Asia then west through Turkey, and on throughout eastern Europe into western Europe to Poland and up into Russia. NOT A DROP OF SCOTTISH BLOOD ...but as I said I am a second generation American and that's what the people become a mix of all the continually conquered people throughout Europe and then the Americas . And here in the Americas more than anywhere else the acceptance of mixed marriages has relaxed to the point that I believe at some point if not already there will be a people who are of all nationalities.
The Irish might still explain it. At one point very far back, the Irish and the Scottish were one people. There was a disagreement and some of them left and settled in what is now known as Scotland. Some Scottish last names are also Irish names that are accepted by Scottish clan societies as accepted descendants of those who were part of the Scottish clan. It sounds like you took a DNA test, if so, that DNA are the dominant genes that consist of you as a person. It does not factor in that you still descend from a Scottish ancestor, it just means you didn't inherit that person's genes when you were being born. It also does not factor in that you are a carrier for the next generation, of genes you don't have as your own personal dominant genes. This is why the paperwork is so important. I look like an Allison, that gene skipped a few generations to get to me but it just doesn't change the fact that I also descend from the Duncans and as such, I still am the 45th great grandson of Duncan I, King of Scots. I am who I am and dna is just a small part of that. It's a good place to start but it's not the final word on the subject like some try to believe that it is. I hope that helps.
Yea. It will be a time of no pure breeds but just a bunch of heinz 57s or oreos
@Picalo Pete They are and when someone wants to get a test done they are the first ones I mention but I always tell them exactly what they're getting so they know that while it is a great place to start, it won't be everything.
My parents' DNA tests both showed Scottish ancestry when there's no family history from that area, it was all recorded as Scandinavia and Germany, with the surprise being Hungarian/Magyar, but that's easily explained by the nearness of the regions. Doing a little more digging, I think it's the preponderance of the haplogroup (I think it's R1b) that predominates in Scotland, even though it's common across Europe that made 23 assign you Scottish ancestry.
If you're really curious, My True Ancestry will match your DNA to archeological finds, and what I found with my family is that yes, we really do match finds in Scotland and England, but they're generally from the Bronze Age, and Viking Age England. For my family, we're pretty much everything north of the Alps, back to Hunter Gatherers, with Scythian (from modern day Ukraine and Russia) as the exception.
@@deadcatbounce3124 Exactly, it's those type of things that mess people up. That's a good option to help people understand. I have Russian and Roman ancestors and when my dad did his test, it didn't even pick that up. It's a great place to start but like I said, the tests aren't everything.
There is a rock in the mountains of western North Carolina that is out of the way but tourists like to go see it. It has a lot of letters carved into it that are undeciphered. The Cherokee were asked about it, but they say that the carvings were done by people who lived there before them. Apparently, this generation doesn't know who those people were, but they know there were people here before their people came.
So what? There were over 1,000 different Native languages do you actually think that Cherokees which is not even their real name which you as a white person do not know were the only tribes in what you call now North carolina?
Besides the Cherokees were the most colonized of all the tribes so they lost their history way before all the other tribes did due to christianization and other factors imposed by whites so asking them is like asking a white person they only speak their own language from recovery not in practice
@@skykc wow so arrogant! take a chill pill will you!
Where is it located exactly?
@@skykc
What is their “real” name and who gets to decide what it is?
I recently watched a similar article on RUclips, it said archaeologists in the US have dated long boats, settlements, weapons, jewellery and ceramics that belonged to Vikings, predating Columbus by several hundred years.
Yeah- in Newfoundland, which is Canada, not the U.S.
Pretty well established now. I suspect we seriously underestimate earlier civilisations. I wouldn’t be surprised if VERY early people were all globally connected.
The problem with Indians, they were Nomadic They had.
No.
Known permanent structures. Accept in Mexico, the AZ TEC's. So they had t Tippies and followed animals Buffalo around for food. No permanent settlement.
S so show me your permanent settlement a city.@@LemonScreech
Glad you found the book 1491.... When I found it, it amazed me some of the discoveries he had observed in South America. I studied North American Archaeology briefly years ago, and the one thing they always impressed upon us that disease was the main killer, and the people that remained were more like refugees than anything else. The Hopewell mound builders are proof that there used to be a great big nation and trade in the North once.
What is the name of the book and where might I find it?
But how do you explain copper in europe in ancient times from isle royale. How do they explain bodies in a bog in florida that still had brain matter in them, and it is said the dna was caucasian. And the mounds here and mounds in ireland etc. History is not what we think it is. And what about these red haired giants with six toes and six fingers of which it was said at least one was killed in afghanistan. It was apparently killing and eating people for a long time there and it killed apparently some u.s. soldiers. Then others were sent there and they killed it. I have heard story's of indians apparently waging a battle against giants in the u.s. and giant skeletons being taken and apparently destroyed. It talks in genesis about giants. And another thing, I have heard of indians having treats with these giants and the giants stayed in certain places, and the Indians avoided them. Makes you wonder what is killing these people in the national parks that dave paulidas talks about. Seems strange these places were designated as national parks in the first place. I also think there may be different kinds of cryptids. Natives talk about skinwalkers and people just laugh. But I think we have to stop thinking inside of a little box and think outside the box. Many people have seen strange things especially in those parks. People try to say " oh it was a bear". I was a hunter and I know a bear when I see one plus they were extremely rare where I am. And those way up north were only black bear. And I doubt there is a black bear between 13-15 ft. I think many hunters have seen the sasquatch but do not say anything because their afraid of ridicule. Btw I know someone who claims to have seen a dogman. I just inquired as to where, so I can avoid that area.
Great book - along with its companion 1493. Both good, but I personally enjoyed 1491 a little more. Guns, Germs & Steel is very good, too. Also Sapiens by Yuval Harari.
Diseases and war
@@graymatters7584 Yuval Harari is godless mess! I wouldn’t pollute my mind by anything he wrote!
I saw an archeological report that indicated that the North American Indigenous that you were speaking of, DISPLACED a whole race of previous occupiers of the North Americas. In other words, they are finding a totally genetically different ancient people who lived here; not related to who we call American Indians.
This is what MOST want to continue lying about, ignoring and hiding.
It is not a secret but a cover up by the Smithsonian and other Archaeologists in history.
They pushed the narrative that the indigenous Copper Colored peoples that lived in the Americas were savages, had no history, no writings, no pottery, buildings, etc.
ALL LIES.
They KNOW most lands are our lands and they’re all squatting and stealing.
They’ve tried in just about every continent and island to kill us, the indigenous/Copper Colored tribes off or transport us TO Africa and other Islands like Jamaica and Haiti.
Most Islanders do not know they come from America.
When they couldn’t completely destroy us in the Americas, they reclassified us NUMEROUS times, today calling us “African” American 🙄🙄.
The great majority of us are NOT African.
DNA tests are SCAMS…and they know that too.
Of course we will likely NOT have Asian DNA common to the current people they’ve decided are the “Natives”.
How about exhuming some bones found in the mounds across America THEN compare our DNA to that.
How about stop lying about and hiding what was found in the mounds.
Bet they won’t because they already know what truth is there.
The entire point of the United States is to lie, murder and steal.
We are indigenous to Turtle Island/Ameru/Ameri.
They did this to us to fit their lying azz narratives so they can keep our lands and the minerals.
The most truth I’ve seen the United States admit to is Websters dictionary 1828 definition of American.
Look it up, then look up Copper Colored…it ain’t no white person nor these Asians over here squatting.
Who are they what people are they called by.
Where in the Americas did they found the evidence?
Aboriginal Americans were African descendants, arriving about 138,000 years ago…😃
@@dennisclarrett4677 correct
I just watched a Hopi man's interview. He said the Hopi had been on their land forever, but the Navajo came from Alaska. The Hopi had to build their villages on top of mesa's, so they could see attacks coming.
Also the farmland in the jungles makes more sense, when you see the pyramids and other ancient ruins there.
Do you know the Hopi religious beliefs? I dont remember where I heard this decades ago, but I think I remember someone saying that they were monotheistic. The Hopi didn't worship spirits like other tribes in that area, but a single creator god.. They also had legends of someone similar to a Messiah or Savior. (I could be completely wrong, so please don't quote me on this.)
The kachina dolls were made for good and bad by the Hopi. The dolls for me, were made to say they had more than one god....
Ironically, The American Hopi Tribe shows similarities with The Dogon Tribe of Mali, West Africa. Truly remarkable.
@Rick Anglin You lied. The "Navajo" and "Apache" both speak the same language as my mother's family from Alaska, Native speakers say it's like someone from Texas giving directions to someone from Scotland that's asked for a menu. The names for numbers are the same.
@@MissCleo24 The Navajo speak the Athabaskan language, as do the Apache, and the Alaskan Athabaskans are one of the largest private landowners in North America. The Inuit are a minority population that reside above the Arctic Circle, and were previously referred to as Eskimo.
That could explain lost knowledge. I went to a place in Mexico that had been an Indian ruins site. You had to walk up like 50 steps then the land was flat. It was concrete slaps and under there were huge concrete well like huge flower pots. The guide said when they broke some of them open there were ppl in praying postions. It was freaky yet beautiful. I love history and this video is wonderful. All the ppls comments were fantastic and I'm hooked. Everyone seems so educated about this, where have I been?
Wow, I blundered on this by accident. Being a fifth generation Appalachian American from an easily traceable Galloway Scot’s family after I started I was persuaded to go all in for Y-DNA analysis, so I have had an introduction to the capabilities of Y-DNA although I am still working at understanding some of the vocabulary. I now can trace this line back to the 1600s. Anyway, I am hooked already!
Waste of money and time. The so-called experts really don't understand DNA or genetics. Just like everything else, it is all speculation and conjecture by mostly incompetent students and wannabe famous professors. The truth is scientists have been wrong about everything since civilization began. Today there is an intelligence drought in American universities and the DNA testing is just another scam to get your money and personal information.
Don't trust that DNA read the fine print on the bottom.. most scientists explain it better and how it is not accurate. Kinda a fad now.
@@atticusmartinschannel ( U G G G)😅
It’s easy for some people to rewrite history and present it to others that don’t know history to begin with.
My ancestors were the Dixons. They came in the early 1600s. Did you get any Cherokee blood in your bloodline?
What happened to all the Egyptian artifacts and hieroglyphs found in the Grand Canyon? There were advanced civilizations living in "the states".
Are you talking about the claims G.E. Kincaid made? I thought those were proven to be a hoax?
They weren't Egyptian, they were artifacts of the nephilem giants that were infested in the americas ,that died off and those left killed off .
There were advanced civilizations living in "the states" until the drunken sailors showed up from Europe, disobeyed their Commandments and tried to murder them all.
Not at all. Very real
@@FriendOfChrist absolute hoaxes
I could listen to this all day. There is so much we don't know. Subscribed for more :)
Fascinating!!! Thank you so much for such important information. I will must definitely look for all your videos. As a woman born in Guatemala, your revelations touch not only my brain, they also touch my heart.
What I find fascinating is pyramids in ancient Egypt also similar structures in ancient Aztec / Asia/ India etc
So do you know that black ppl inspired other nations? I mean the Greeks learned everything from them
"The whole earth was of one language & one speech..."
The pyramid shape is a fundamental geometric shape. The circle and the square as well. Just like writing, pyramid shapes can easily be developed in unconnected regions or continents.
They just did a test on a native here in Montana. His ancestors were here for like 30k years. His ancestors talked about how they walked across the ice from Russia to Alaska.
Well, 30k years goes along with evolution, not creation~
Yeah
If you wanna use science to exaggerate the amount of years humans were not here 30 years ago, and if they were those are the people you all are digging up, that was a part of the flood that got washed away in the book of Genesis, so that proves the Bible true, not evolution!
I meant to say 30,000 years ago and those were pre-flood era people, which lines up with biblical history, perfectly not evolution! The more you are trying to disprove the Bible, the more you prove it to be true!
Interestingly in something else I had seen suggested that the first European explorers navigating the Amazon reported encountering large cities along the river. A century later, explorers couldn’t find them and said the previous accounts were not true. I’ve seen some areas in my metro that have fallen into disrepair and became uninhabited, that after 50 years nature will have done a pretty good job of reclaimation as evidenced by just ten years of neglect. Of course the Vikings who visited North America apparently didn’t feel compelled to share iron working secrets with the inhabitants they encountered. I really wonder how much real contact Iron Age societies had with the Americas prior to then.
Europeans carried diseases, notably small pox, that decimated entire tribes of native Americans. It's entirely possible, I'd say probable, those cities were very real & were abandoned due to outbreaks within a month of contact with those early explorers & reclaimed by the jungle. That pattern was seen throughout the western hemisphere & there's no reason to believe South America would fare any different.
Read 1491
It's amazing what one little European germ can do
11:07
We recently discovered those cities using LIDAR imiging.
As we have come to expèct from answers in genesis, this is an amazing and very informative documentary, that has again broken the stereotypical view of the pre Columbus America's, that paints the lands and the Indian tribes living there in a completely new light, showing again how the mainstream history is as misguided as it ever was.
So Thank you for correcting the narrow view of the culture that predated the European influx, it is always a good day when I can go to bed having changed my world view and learned a new dynamic , one that I suspected but had only scant information to rest it upon, allowing me to view the native people's in their true guise, not one imposed upon us from outdated history books and Hollywood tales, but one based upon proper scientific research and unbiased analysis, I cannot wait to carry on along this avenue as this series progresses. Again thank you, and may many honourable spirits of long dead native people's now rest a little easier knowing that their true story has finally begun to leak out into the modern world.
Check out "Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee", it's some non-fiction that might give you more than you expect. This isn't a guilt-trip either, you seem respectful, but it's a hard read. Great gift for Columbus Day, though.
After viewing the realities between the left and right of recent times, I come to realize that we will never ever know what really happened in the past.
see comment above
Yes I agree
The world is far smaller than we all think especially in our younger years. I had the blessing of living on both coasts by the time I was 4 and living in Colorado but the time I turned 5. My dad has gone down south for vacation and long lost friends have grabbed him in crowds he hasn’t seen in years and hugged him. It took me 46 hours to drive across the country when I was 21, that was nothing to me then, even less now. Even without cars you can cross great distances with the proper determination and preparation. Some people have walked across the US in just over a month. It’s really not that hard to see just how small the world really is. It seems vast in your mind but when you go out and explore it physically, it’s clear this world is pretty small.
Love it
most of the earth is still unexplored according to the data, even with that many people, for every individual it is a very huge and vast place, and in the past it was common for entire armies to walk between countries within a few days, they were stronger and more versatile
If the world so small how come black african never left the jungles of Central africa.
@@blackloki9 they didn't need to.
@@blackloki9 ... Because they knew that the Africans on the coasts would round them up, and sell them as slaves?
I’m Native American, I have been told stories from my grandparents that we have been on this land for over 50 thousand years!
The traditions and customs of Native Americans don't mean anything to these conspiracy theorists brother.
@@robertwilkins3167 … guess you can’t understand science and would rather stick to your false narrative…
@@jafojafo5412 I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Understand what science? Creationist so-called science? Creationists have a monopoly on science and not, say, scientists?
False narrative? What narrative and why is it false? Who is is falsifying this narrative that I know nothing about and for what purpose?
I smell more conspiracy theories.
The world isn't even that old.
It may be true but you weren’t here first.
This is what MOST want to continue lying about, ignoring and hiding.
It is not a secret but a cover up by the Smithsonian and other Archaeologists in history.
They pushed the narrative that the indigenous Copper Colored peoples that lived in the Americas were savages, had no history, no writings, no pottery, buildings, etc.
ALL LIES.
They KNOW most lands are our lands and they’re all squatting and stealing.
They’ve tried in just about every continent and island to kill us, the indigenous/Copper Colored tribes off or transport us TO Africa and other Islands like Jamaica and Haiti.
Most Islanders do not know they come from America.
When they couldn’t completely destroy us in the Americas, they reclassified us NUMEROUS times, today calling us “African” American 🙄🙄.
The great majority of us are NOT African.
DNA tests are SCAMS…and they know that too.
Of course we will likely NOT have Asian DNA common to the current people they’ve decided are the “Natives”.
How about exhuming some bones found in the mounds across America THEN compare our DNA to that.
How about stop lying about and hiding what was found in the mounds.
Bet they won’t because they already know what truth is there.
The entire point of the United States is to lie, murder and steal.
We are indigenous to Turtle Island/Ameru/Ameri.
They did this to us to fit their lying azz narratives so they can keep our lands and the minerals.
The most truth I’ve seen the United States admit to is Websters dictionary 1828 definition of American.
Look it up, then look up Copper Colored…it ain’t no white person nor these Asians over here squatting.
I think the title is somewhat misleading.
I expected to listen about the origins of Native Americans, but I listened to the nature of their lives pre-contact instead.
Great work though, I enjoyed it, and I'm really thankful for the sources of information being clearly cited, something uncommon on youtube. I hope to see more in the future!
This isn't what I expected. The title has ORIGINAL in all caps, so I thought you'd be discussing who settled North America before the tribes we have today.
It toke a different turn real quick.
every 100 years the new take over from the "originals"
perpetually forever till the end of days.
Are we not always wrong. The more we discover, the more we discover our ignorance about the past.
Trust the science. Lololol
It doesn’t matter where we come from,or think we come from,it’s where we’re headed. It seems to be getting worse every day.
It absolutely does matter where we come from.
You can know for sure where you headed.
Bible explains where we are going and where we come from. And you are right.
The future will be horrifying.
There will be time of 7 years as never was before.
All the wars combined together won’t come close to this time.
But there’s a way to escape this time of judgment on earth.
Those who believe on Jesus Christ and trust Him for their salvation WILL BE SAVED.
They will be raptured before the 7 years of Tribulation.
Jesus came 2000 some years ago on the rescue mission. And He offers escape from hell through faith in Him. He paid for sins of those who will trust in Him.
Once you receive the GIFT/GGRACE
YOU WILL BE SAVED
It’s so simple
Grace is something you don’t deserve
You can buy it or earn it,
It’s a free gift.
Jesus did everything to rescue you from your sins.
Will you choose Jesus.
Religion won’t save you, people or your own works WONT save you.
Just ask Jesus to save you and trust in Him.
@@jasonjasonson1517 why?
It’s getting worse because of lies and the determination of paler skinned people to continually deny the humanity of darker skinned people.
I truly believe once the fascination they have with their own skin stops, then peace can begin.
@Takaya Sweeney What lies and determination is that you speak of?
My question is…Who are the $5 Indians.
Notice no one ever says I am a descendant of the $5 Indians, but we all know yall bought a nationality for 5 bucks.
Reminds me of the movie “Apocalypto” that has scenes that reflected intense landscape-altering activity by aboriginal people right before the Spanish arrived.
Yes, we've had giants found in my area. One was found at the Lovelock caves and Pyramid Lake. Its pretty crazy to drive by and know what was found there.
As I read when I lived up there, A researcher started digging out in the caves sometime at the turn of the century in the early 1900's and found skulls, and parts of hands. When it was reported, the Smithsonian came out to Lovelock, closed off the area, excavated the entire site and left. No one has seen anything since. And the Smithsonian never mentioned it or displayed it. The Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca has a giant skull (not one of those from the cave) but it is still a giant skull.
Bigfoots maybe ?
yes, cleopatras twins (Helios and Selene) brought the whole family crip over here and reburied them in southern ill, (Alexander the great) cleopatra, mark Anthony, were all reburied here in America :) check out (Harry Hubbard) on RUclips, he has researched this for 25 years :)
@@rmac1199 yeah between the SMITHSONIAN AND THE VATICAN,nothing will be added to,but much will be taken away,we the people know what they are doin,we just are pissed off enough,its coming though,my neighbors are pissed at everything,no conversation ends with low blood pressure
This pretty much proves the Bible is true through science and history
I was once told the history of the Ancient Ones of the Southwest by an elder named Blue Star. She told that after the sky gods left the Central Americas the native peoples did what they could to bring them back. First offerings sacrifice of food and flowers. When that did not work they offered jewels and gold, when that did not work they offered animals, when that did not work they offer human sacrifice. But when it came to offering the very young as sacrifices a huge split happened in the old culture. The ones who believed in sacrifice stayed and the ones who did not believe in killing moved north, in two waves, into what is now the Southwest and Southeastern US and beyond. They may have been part of the mound builders. No matter what was offered, the gods were not allowed to return to Earth.
Awesome
Whites the first sqaters
The Book of Mormon explains it!
As an African we were told we have family in Brazil and America it self. I'm Ghanaian and my DNA marches with some Brazilian and Venezuela
Transatlantic slave trade where Africans sold off their slaves.
You are absolutely right. We as black people are left out of history. It's really sickening to the point it's hilarious.
@@williamb4335 Did you miss the whole story in Exodus, Cleopatra, or the Moor invasion of Europe?
@@josecoope2211 Although the origins of Egypt and pre-invasion Europe was dark skinned, Cleopatra was Greek. She was of the Ptolemaic dynasties installed by Alexander via Ptolemy I
@@josecoope2211 The Moors got just a paragraph in my high school history books so they don’t really teach that. They don’t teach the good AND the bad the Moors carried out on Europeans either.
Keep shaping history We love the info very educational
I watched a program some years ago, where this man, I believe he was Professor, or Archeologist, he talked about how Native Americans weren't the first peoples to come to North America either. He believes that they came from either Northern Europe, or around France. It was because they found the same type of arrow heads that were being made in Europe at the time. And they predated the ones the Natives were making.
Those people are called Solutreans they came from Europe. Archeologists found their burial grounds in Florida they were called the bog people.
Clovis?
@@jonhawkins7510 I share almost 10% of DNA with Clovis-Anzik -1. I ran my DNA threw an Ancient DNA calculator program.
Whites in North America were wiped out by so-called "native Americans" who arrived later. Reverse of the prevailing narrative.
Some North American Indians are larger or/and taller than most Indians of the New World. Has it always been that way or are they the result of mixing with taller northern Europeans ?
The great Italian explorer Giovanni da Verrazzano was the first European to explore what is now the East Coast of the United States. By ship, he sailed up the east coast from Florida to New York. His eyewitness account is found in a 10 page letter he penned to the King of France in 1524 , 100 years before the Pilgrims, stating that ALL of the people he encountered during his voyage of the American east coast were DARK SKINNED with SHORT thick hair. His exact quote is that they look just like Ethiopians!!!!! None of the people who we currently describe as Native Americans (Indians) were ever mentioned!!! He kidnapped a small boy and took him back to France where the boy was looked upon as being AFRICAN!!!!!
Good thing we have DNA tests now, isn't it?
I´m portuguese. It's established in our History that we went everywhere in America (From Canada to South Argentina) before Columbus arrived and all was kept a secret, because we had no people to claim it and keep it, but also for another reason.
It's somehow established that we made contact and friendship with the South american tribes, that were huge. Millions and millions of people. And unfortunately those contacts originated a terrible consequence that spread like wild fire throughout the entire continent. Small pox, tetanus, syphilis and several other pandemic events went nuclear and wiped almost all the native population that had no defenses. It was terrible and I believe that could be the reason Portugal kept the discovery of America a secret for more than a century. The same happened with the Spanish in Central and North America.
As a Christian country that mostly went to the world for commerce (that is proven by the way portuguese interacted with China, Japan, India and most places we went, always with commercial outposts). The death of so many people even if not intended would bring a very heavy burden. I believe the slave trade was actually a way to repopulate after that event.
Very interesting thought, that last one.
Would make sense from what he said of original numbers on the higher end.
How so when Africans we’re killed as well? 🤔🤔
Hardly unlikely
@@nelsonbermudez8273 exactly my thoughts. The Portugese didn't give two shots about wiping out the Natives. More gold for them and more land to claim.
You did not move freely across my lands I assure you lol
-COMANCHE NATION
Another thing to point out: The Norse visited North America around 1000 AD, and the event is recorded in the old Icelandic sagas. They didn't settle there, by the way, due to the hostility of the natives.
The interesting thing is that the description of the land and its inhabitants in the Icelandic sagas very much fits with the classical understanding of pre-Columbian America. The explorers from Europe found a land so pristine that at first they thought it was uninhabited. And when they met the locals, they were described as very primitive people. And there does not seem to have been very many of them, at least compared to the abundant resources of the land, even though they could be dangerous enough, due to their unpredictable attacks on the wannabe settlers.
Now, let it be said that the Viking descriptions of North America probably relates only to the north east coast. So they don't describe the heartland of the North American native sivilisation.
My question to you is have you read the book " They came before Columbus by Dr. Ivan Van Sertimar ? "
Randall Carlson, Ben Davidson and Dr. Jeanson should have a round table.
This is actually helpful for me. I am writting an alternate history/time travel series, and one of the characters is dealing with Texas and mezoamerica in the first century. Good to know more information to help me write correct characters. The series starts with "Earth's Eulogy" and I am about to release book 7 once I get it back from the editor.
Interesting.
I’d love to have a read. Consider the Hermetica, A Book of The Beginnings, Atlantis: The Antediluvian World and Other Worlds - Other Tongues. Kurimeo Ahau is also worth looking into, he has a channel here. Bobby Hemmit, Phil Valentine, and Dr Delbert Blair have plenty of lectures available on their websites, as well as bits and pieces of lectures on RUclips. Mind Unveiled is also a treasure trove for ideas and potential areas of research
And Cahokia?
Don’t use this video if you want accurate information.
It’s just a bunch of vague suppositions and mostly garbage, masquerading as research.
Good luck on your book
Let my natives bros live in peace...
There were People here way before The American Indians, or Native Indians! As far as Native people, I was born here and that makes me A Native American as are most of us!
Correct, so same principle applies to all black, Hispanic , Asian, and so on. Right?
Yes. Native American does not equal American Indian. Native American has roots in the No nothing party. Check it out!
@@shaypierre4132
Disagree. And if your last name is Pierre you’re not native. Sounds like you’re of French ancestry.
@@rustydogrustydog9191 well for one I didn’t say I was. And two no that’s not not my real name. I don’t have to be to comment. Definitely not Native American
@Apollo Mayaimi
If that’s your way of inferring that they where black it’s wrong. And Native Americanis not a political organization. It refers to the native tribes of which most where moved to reservations. They are very much real and still here.
Fascinating! In one episode, you've turned nearly the entirety of what I know and understand to be not only America but also South America on it's ear! I can't wait to see what is in store in episodes to come! I'm an enthusiastic new subscriber..at least!
I learned a long time ago, through researching my family genealogy, that all people are related somewhere in the past...this is shown in the bible. I have compared many family trees and see that many in the south of my state are a descendant of at least a couple of the first French colony in Acadia in 1604. There were 86 family names and I am descended from 80 of them. In researching different people's family trees, I have run across thousands of names also descended from some of those families, even though some of them or their ancestors were never in my birth state, but half way across the country. If we go farther back, it would show that all us are related one way or another, at the least by a common ancestor. 👍
Don't we all generate from Noah?
@@karinlarsen2608 as said, this is shown in the bible. 👍
@@karinlarsen2608 no
Eric, I like your point about this discovery is confirming the biblical point that we are all connected by blood and race, etc.
@@karinlarsen2608 NO...We all generate from ADAM..it is written in the Bible!
Decades ago, when in my late 20's and early 30's I read a book "The Time Before Columbus" but I've been unable to find it in my 60's and 70's. I can't recall the name but Louis L'Amour wrote about Chinese trading vessels and the west coast nations. And recently a geneticist proved that S.A. natives have Pacific Islander DNA too
There's a argentinian historian by the name of Cristian Rodrigo Uturralde he wrote two books, 1492 fin de la barbarie,am not sure if is possible to get them in english but the documentation is enormous and very helpful for those interested in that period of time.
what does that title translate to?
@@AngryNegativeHistoryProject "The end of the barbaric age". C'mon on, that's the same as in English dude.
@@gabrielesolletico6542 you're so smart and kind. One days I is going 2 b like u.
@@gabrielesolletico6542 😂
@@AngryNegativeHistoryProject oh you're both funny😂
The simplist approach, that assumes all the native groups were static, and all got along like a big family, is obvliously mistaken. They had warriors, so clearly there were conflicts. Names of places and water, to today, reveil movements. Lake Huron today is surrounded by Ojibwa people, the Huron (Wyndot) left in the 1650's and are now in Nebraska.
The lack of written accounts, and deliberate erasure of their history has lead to our current lack of knowledge. Hopefully we can continue to piece it all back together.
It's a shame more people haven't watched this.I find it fascinating!
I find it fascinating. I wish I would have had more conversations with grandparents and great grandparents.
Extremely interesting! I couldn't stop watching from beginning to end. Thank you!
I like the theory that we've had 5 civilizations that were wiped out in extinctions. This answers how tools and other artifacts are found in coal and other materials. Gotta wonder how far they went with technology and if that played a part in any or all of the global catastrophes that nearly wiped out all life on earth repeatedly.
The German bloodline is Assyrian and the other European ethnic groups also came from the same general area. So it's no wonder you find central Asian genetics when you go back to that time period. Not only that, but the Mediterranean isn't really much a barrier, it's a highway, so you're going to end up with a lot of intermixing in the genetic code.
When I was in grammar school, some 50 years ago, we were taught that the North American natives actually came from Asia that came to North America by crossing the Bering Straight.
Yes, running from Ghengis Khan.
Excellent video. Two thumbs up 👍🏼👍🏼. Does Dr. Jamison have a book?
answersingenesis.org/store/product/traced/?sku=10-2-542
What do the Native Americans say? Not sure what you were trying to achieve but they say the original inhabitants were Giants. What does that mean?
The Smithsonian has collected giant skeletons from Indian Mounds through the Midwest. They now supress any news of this, presumably because it doesn't fit the modern narrative. 💀 ☠️ 💀
Right out of Genesis 6.
Look at all the burial mounds all over the eastern states from giant remains that have been confiscated and hidden by the Smithsonian!
Descendants of the Nephilim?
NEPHALIM
Red headed giants
Nathaniel, my family genealogy book contains a story about Chief Sitting Bull, He visited my ancestors at their ‘little house on the prairie’ in Dakota Territory. A little girl with orange hair lived there and her presence was requested….no body was harmed. ”This orange hair reminds me of a time of peace between my people and the white men from the north” -Sitting Bull. I’ve told this story many times, since my only child was born a ginger. I choose to believe the Chief was referring to Vikings instead of French fur traders. Ever since facing a junior high lacrosse team from the Onondaga nation, I’ve noticed far too many traces of impressive intellect & wisdom to accept the common view of pre-Colombian N. America. Another read which may help connect some dots is Sapiens, Yuval Noah Harari
The recurring theme that rattles in my brain is the question of empires…..Egypt?…..Rome?…..Star Wars? We don’t seem to learn from our mistakes. Perhaps tribal life is not so wrong?
That's not really a good way to think of it. You are inferring inferiority based on one lineage vs another. I don't think their intellect or other attributes tell us much. Those things would exist no matter the lineage. Cultural influences would be a stronger indicator, but I think there were at least 2 major and 1 minor migration into the Americas. 1st came by sea probably 20000 years ago or more. Then there is the traditional migration across the Bering strait that would have happened 15000 years ago. Then we have the later minor migrations of vikings, possibly a lost tribe of Israel, even Jesus may have visited the Americas when he was young and we do not know his location.
Yuval Noah Harari is a globalist or Orwellian extreme. I wouldn't be looking to him for wisdom.
@@SamtheIrishexan Sam, thank you for disagreeing, inferiority was not my intent. I was sharing a family story to support the author of this video, regarding the ignorance of the pilgrims, etc. To be clear, my curiosity in pre history is driven mostly by behavior. With the challenges we now face, the well recorded, yet brief 2000 years of western civilization can seem like a giant how-not-to guide. Resources like the library of Alexandria are gone, nobody understands Stonehenge, Easter island, pyramids, etc. We hedonize Hitler, but rarely question the similarly peculiar genocidal behavior of Julius Caesar (battle of Alesia-live free or die) which continues celebration through salad dressing and continued colonialism. This kind of crap seems to happen on every continent, everybody likes to reproduce, DNA migrates. Lineage is the least of my concern. Non-violence seems an impossible goal, because humanity rarely endures without occasional violence. Inevitably, a growing population will naturally face resource scarcity, and resort to violence as conflict resolution. However, I believe the motives matter. Many tribes have used violence to protect vital resources for survival, while the infamous leaders of large empires extract a demented joy from using violence as conquest. Today, political leaders seem to create narratives to motivate violence. Some have died for food & water, and others have died for ideas and ideology. I believe Sitting Bull, Crazy Horse, etc fought for survival, but I’ll forever wonder at General Custer’s last thought.
Native American Indians weren’t here first I’ve always known they were not here first and it’s been proven many times over.
The secret is in the language. We are all part of the HUMAN race yet come from different tribes from across the lands. Tribalism is not wrong. It is not wrong to prefer your own peoples because different peoples have different views. Yet we need to learn from one another as the human race to progress further. Kindness, wisdom, understanding and morality is key. Celebrate our differences. Because we are the human race. Diverse like the spectrums of light, energy and sound.
Empire of the Summer Moon is an incredible view into the Comanche tribe and Quanah Parker ! Brilliant !
Can u post recap of major points covered that change perception of history in one slide?
In each episode… it would make understanding of significant misperceptions in history easier…
As a lay person, I read Gavin Menzies “1421, The Year China Discovered America,” and believe through his analysis that Chinese have travelled around the world and populated civilizations throughout the world. I’ve see through the native Indians, like, American Indians, Mayans, Aztecs, etc..do have Asiatic features. Menzie, through DNA has shown that the Chinese DNA is part of the DNA of native Indians in the new world..
Native Americans have mongoloid DNA not necessarily Chinese and where are the remnants of Chinese culture ? Which native tribe expressed cultural artifacts of their Chinese heritage ?
@@eazyroc3594 excellent response
An Inquiry Into the Distinctive Characteristics of the Aboriginal Race of America
by Samuel George Morton
It cannot be questioned that physical diversities do occur, equally singular and inexplicable, as seen in different shades of color, varying from a fair tint to a complexion almost black; and this too under circumstances in which climate can have little or no influence. So also in reference to stature, the differences are remarkable in entire tribes which, more over, are geographically proximate to each other. These facts, however, are mere exceptions to a general rule, and do not alter the peculiar physiognomy of the Indian, which is as undeviatingly characteristic as that of the Negro; for whether we see him in the athletic Charib or the stunted Chayma, in the dark Californian or the fair Borroa, he is an Indian still.
@@eazyroc3594 there is none and will be none.
@@mikejones-wn1sw The natives of America were dark-skinned people described by Columbus as copper coloured and he described as the negros as they remain to be because they're still there they changed their status from Aboriginal, to coloured, Afro Americans to African Americans hence by so called accident the Census building holding the information burnt down. There's lots of information out there to say the indigenous were enslaved in their own land and transported out to the other side of America where planters were required. Some natives bought other tribes.
Central Asia does not mean Oriental/Mongoloid. The Indo Europeans came from Central Asia 3500 BC. Many other Caucasian groups also began in Central Asia, or Eurasia; the Slavs, the Goths, the Turks, the Bulgars, Sarmatians, etc...
Tartarians
Central Asia is a pretty vague term like Siberia: which Siberia? The broad term like western people might use in casual conversation or the more specific administrative term? More of a rule of thumb than something helpful to research if you ask me.
Do you know why the turtle myth shows up in these three cultures.
The myth of a giant turtle or tortoise supporting or containing the world occurs in Hindu mythology, in Chinese mythology and in Native American mythology.
@@strappedfatman7858 that describes the flat earth dome firmament when you think of the turtle shape...
@@sm-hi7jt
I wrote it because all myths are related. Those lands are the lands that Alexander the Great was not allowed to conquer. He died after attacking India. The elephants holding the turtle world is the unconquered world.
Hi, I find this so intersting. Reminds me of the permaculture movement that for 50 years aprox have been doing this. Also reminding of Canadas woodlands that contained all foods and was preserved like you mentioned like a sofisticated park. Thanks for closing the gap in historie were this ancient highly productive farming was "forgotten".
The people who were here where black people they were the Indians historians don't want to admit it but the original that inhabited this land we're black
@@garystewart5443 yeah, dark skinned that's right. We have to all get along.
@@garystewart5443 haha you know whites were in the middle east to begin with and got killed off. That is why alot of afghans have blue eyes. and NO Jesus was not black either. White flight and White death
@@lindakleckner215 they were black people not must dark skinned
@Ketazowski the bible. Try reading it. We are the originals. All land on this earth was willed to 3 black men...Noah's sons
Wow, some of these views fly in the face of the norm and ideologies of ANSWERS IN GENESIS and yet they had this interview and discussion and posted this video. Bravo ! This is how we gain knowledge. Ken Ham's face was priceless, when Dr. Jeanson said "That doesn't account for the 100,000 years of human life ".
I lived in Wendover NV. For years and did a lot of exploring, as my curiosity began when digging in my yard I found sea shells.
That's neat. Growing up we lived on an inland river that had clay cliffs full of shell fossils. We often found shark teeth. Once when we were traveling throught the mountains of Tennessee, we went swimming in a murky lake and found shell fossils there too.
You might want to follow SuspiciousObservers channel and view his playlists. It looks like the sun catestrophically erupted about 12,000 years ago and the crust of the earth broke free of the mantle. The seas overtopped the Rockies coming from the west. You would enjoy
I live in SW Virginia, near Wythe County. Back in the 60's-70's, when Interstate 77 was being constructed, @ The Tunnel, a primitive village was un-earthed, and later was carbon-dated to be 14,000-16,000 years old. This beats Egypt, the reconized beginning of our current civilization by some 11,000-13,000 years. Seems like Hominids have been scampering about, all around the globe even earlier than that. We can talk until we "turn blue in the face", but tomorrow, next week, next year, another "find" will surpass our previous conjecture about "Who was on First?" I don't know. "No, he was on Second!" (see; Abbott & Costello).
From Boone NC, is the Tunnel you reference the Tunnels on I77 at East River and Big Walker Mountains?
@@brianjones7660 yes. if you peel off I-77 onto Rocky Gap exit, it's just short hop. Used to have small visitor center/ shop. I haven't been there in ten+ yrs, don't know if it still there. check Va Tech website, they did a lot of research. Newspapers/T.V. had occasional stories. Road built circa mid-60's. Stories pertinent 70/80's, some linger. Dig was estimated 12,000-14,000 yr ago.(even prior to Beiring Straits, Alaska land-crossing)
I'm 40, and the idea that we were only taught the European version is true because that is what the testing was based upon. That's why we skipped chapters. Me being inquisitive and of Taino ancestry, I would always search through those chapters, and there we were. You always just need to dig deeper. As far as this subject matter, all lands were conquered and lost throughout history. However, it's ignorance to say the indigenous as we know them were the inhabitants when the first Europeans arrived
Maybe with modern tech we can find the truth instead of "History is written by the winners of wars".
This is most interesting, thank you so much for your researching. Awesome
The generational aspect is fascinating. I was an only child and I don't have contact with my only male first cousin on my father's side to do the paternal DNA. What's interesting is my father's family were nobility going back 400 years. This is verified. My grandfather was the last title holder. As such, they had access to women from distant communities. The interesting part is that my father's family immigrated to the US when he was a child. My mother was born in the US but her parents come from two communities that face each other across a river but met in the US. They were not nobility but they were prosperous so they weren't limited to marrying within their communities. Bot of these communities are actually not that far geographically from my father's birth place. In light of the info Dr. Jeanson has presented, one has to wonder if there might not be some connection between both sides of my family going back generations.
The history of the native people where I live say the first people came here in boats and lived on the mountain tops. Archeology has verified this because the oldest artifacts are stone points found at high altitude all along the cascade range.
Very interesting, Would love to hear your views on Nephilim and giants and pre-Flood America. After all numerous giant remains have been discovered, which have disappeared into the Smithsonian Museum, never to be seen again.
So true!
The Nephilim were simply human giants. They aren’t half angel half man. The modern Bibles just don’t translate the word. For some reason they transliterated it. But the KJV (the perfect and preserved Bible in English) says
Genesis 6:4
There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
@@SB-zl7mm there are no such people as native americans....they all came from some other continent during different ice ages and continental events.....anyone who calls the Sioux native americans is grossly uninformed as you appear to be!!!!!!!
@@SB-zl7mm Books have been removed when the King James version was mass printed for the Catholic church.
The book of Enoch has been found, predates the King James version. Its only complete extant version is an Ethiopic translation of a Greek translation made in Palestine from the original Hebrew or Aramaic.
It references other biblical documents and is also referenced by scripture.
The information in the book of Enoch speaks to the Nephelim, the origin of the fallen angels, and how they corrupted the flesh of men and beast of the earth.
this is why the flood happened, because of the corruption of Human DNA.
@@TimeDagar The Anglican Church was established in 1534 by King Henry VIII. The King James Bible was published in 1611 for the Anglican Church, not for the Catholic Church. The Apocrypha is ancient folktales. The Catholic Church added them to what they called the canon. But Jews never had the Apocrypha in their Torah. And Bible-believing Christians throughout the ages didn’t use the Apocrypha either. The KJV translators translated the Apocrypha but they wrote clearly at the top of each page, “This is the Apocrypha.” They did that because they knew it wasn’t holy scripture.
Angels can’t reproduce even with other angels. They certainly can’t reproduce with mankind.
Matthew 22:30
For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.
When the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth what they found wasn't so much a virgin land as a widowed land.
Excellent video. I knew it. We've been lied to so much, we may not even have the correct concept of time!!
Take some acid and think about it.
Very fascinating! Human beings develop the land on which they live, since day one. It has been recently shown that a knowledgeable man, who understands the land, can transform a barren wasteland into a garden paradise in less than 5 yrs. See Geoff Lawton (Greening the Desert) for details. There is nothing new under the sun, where there is a man, there is development of the land, for good or for evil. We are all one blood, decidedly human.♥️
This makes me think of the guy on Ted talk that admitted they culled a bunch of animals somewhere in Africa cuz they thought they were destroying the land and the land got worse, they then realized the giant herds were actually necessary to keep things growing, we needed the dung of animals and their natural deaths to help things grow and if you remove the animals, the land dies.
@@bvictory5698 "Woopsie!" 🤦🏻♀️ At least they corrected their mistake and have learned from it. That's a good thing!♥️
Thank you so much! This changed my whole perspective of the Native American way of life. What an impressive set of cultures, and 115 million people! I do hope that this get taught in schools. We were taught the whole Dances With Wolves concept in school. This is a much more encouraging perspective based on actual research :)
What "actual research"? They made some assumptions, and then extrapolated the assumed population from one area onto the larger subcontinent. That's like taking the population density of New York City, and from that, extrapolating the population of the United States. That's not research. That's projecting assumptions. The other thing to note is that Jeanson implies that Europeans first inhabited the Americas from 1492. Nope. Columbus didn't leave any European settlers. The fact is that Columbus never set foot in what would become North America. Jeanson is a fast talker. However, he is not an anthropological geneticist.
@@frankmartin8471 to assume that all Native American cultures lived in Stone Age conditions is false. That is the premise he presents. Who cares about the precise numbers? The fact that they did not live in harmony with nature as we are led to believe based on a glimpse of a collapsed culture long after their peak due to disease makes a lot more sense than a poor nomadic set of cultures being hurried out of existence by evil white men. And nowhere does he say that Columbus himself set foot in North American or left colonists. I think you’re drinking too much of the historical cool aid.
@@frankmartin8471 lol exactly we know that there are tons of unlivable areas of America like idk...death valley, freezing cold areas, where humans couldn't possibly live then (even with heating A/C they can barely live there today!) comparing the population to a higily livable booming state is so backwards. Just like Mezoamerica had 100x the population of the US cause of how it was built, US had sparer population based on the land and stratification of cultures...this is common sense but not common to most people.
@Rick Anglin What tribe are you from?
@@samaraisnt -- But we do know that people lived in the Grand Canyon, place we now think of as inhabitable. But we don't know why the disappeared leaving most of their belongings behind.
fascinating stuff, thanks brothers sharing.
What needs to be understood is that history will always have to be rewritten.
But not lied about. Not fabricated. Europens have recesdive genes. Dont start another lie. The truth of TMH unfolds every day.. you can not lie, twist, write, escavate, a lie.
Very interesting info and food for thought ….makes me wonder and think more on the history of all our ancient civilizations and cultures, and what is it we’re missing about our ancestors and their abilities with the building of monuments and other structures, and/or how they did things with only primitive tools. I for one believe that our ancestors had knowledge more capable and that it somehow was destroyed through natural disasters and warfare, slipping by our current understanding of human history. I truly believe there is more to this story of human history than what we assume it to be. What is now known are only bits and pieces of a larger picture and a puzzle for us to solve. 👍👍👍👍👍🖖
Mainstream Human history bears little resemblance to what we are taught the Smithsonian for instance dumped a barge of thousands of artifacts from the Americas that didn't go with their narrative into the ocean that is documented and fact bones of giants and Technology we couldn't even fathom the people of Earth were technologically advanced all you have to do is look at any megalithic construction that we cannot reproduce today their structures used multi-ton block with no mortar because they had perfect cuts in multi angles that made them earthquake proof we cannot reproduce today look at the stone of the pregnant woman in Turkey one block thousands of tons we don't have equipment that's able to lift it but they would have you believe humans did it with hemp rope and slave power and an elephant or two our largest cranes would need five or more just to lift it and then we couldn't move it or place it with Precision like they did
History hidden for sure.
No one did anything but primitivity with primative tools. Obviously. Only time can lead to such creativity. More time existed before ancient egypt than since its end.
gobekli tepe Pre dates Egypt and was an extremely advanced settlement. Our ancestors were not primitive they were working granite thousands of years ago.
@@ghosto88 so gobekli was there before the flood? Where'd you get this information?
My ancestors Have Always Been Told part of our family came across the Bering Strait in Alaska that came straight across from Asia and Egypt that's a tribal thing that has been told from my native side
I am surprised that you didn't mention any visits pre Columbus, such as the Vikings.
Answers in Genesis, hi. Thanks for making all of this! Can you start numbering your episodes? Say 'Subject C Part 2 of 6', so we can watch a series of episodes. Plus in it's intended order? We can detain so much more information if it's not bits and pieces here and there over a course of several years.
A numbering system would really improve our learning experience. Perhaps you can even make a video with some sort of a chart of what order is good to follow in studying this. Then one can build upon knowledge given in previous episodes. Hope you read this.
An Inquiry Into the Distinctive Characteristics of the Aboriginal Race of America
by Samuel George Morton
It cannot be questioned that physical diversities do occur, equally singular and inexplicable, as seen in different shades of color, varying from a fair tint to a complexion almost black; and this too under circumstances in which climate can have little or no influence. So also in reference to stature, the differences are remarkable in entire tribes which, more over, are geographically proximate to each other. These facts, however, are mere exceptions to a general rule, and do not alter the peculiar physiognomy of the Indian, which is as undeviatingly characteristic as that of the Negro; for whether we see him in the athletic Charib or the stunted Chayma, in the dark Californian or the fair Borroa, he is an Indian still.
@@mikejones-wn1sw This has absolutely nothing to do with my request. Kindly stop 'answering', when you are not answering.
I think this was episode 11,but he didn't say it until he very end,he said look forward to episode 12 ,I also like looking at things in sequence,it's easier to see the bigger picture
@@mikejones-wn1sw we don't have different races because of environmental reasons like weather and diet we have different races because of different admixtures. White people are mixed with Neanderthal Asians with neanderthals and denisovans Africans with an admixture we know little about etc etc.
I can assure everybody if East Asians and Nigerians switch countries in a million years the ancestors of the East Asians will not evolve into Africans and the ancestors of the indigenous Nigerians will not evolve into East Asians because of environmental reasons like weather and diet.
Again we have different races because of different admixtures
Yes organisms evolve but they evolve quite rapidly. For example people living under atheistic humanist equity North Korea are three inches shorter than their genetic counterpart in South Korea do to malnourishment . The North Koreans didn't evolve into a different species or race than the South Koreans they simply didn't grow to the same potential because of malnourishment. Matter of fact the average Korean today is 10 in taller than their forefathers 100 years ago.
If you take the North Koreans today what's 3 in shorter than the genetic counterpart in South Korea and you put them with the South Koreans one-generation Bill be indistinguishable from the south Koreans again because they didn't evolve into a different species or race they simply didn't receive the same about the nourishment which stunted their growth.
I don't think out-of-africa sounds logical I think into Africa sounds more logical of course I'm not married to that idea.
But if we all originated from Africa we would share the same archaic DNA as today's Africans and we don't. Matter-of-fact Africans also have some Neanderthal DNA and we know that neanderthals didn't come from Africa so it makes the idea of into Africa seem much more likely.
@@garlandantichristian I can definitely grasp that. That is simply my point as to why we are not africans. We do not come from that land. We have always been in the America's. Very odd that the world including africans press their identity hard upon us like they do
The natives have many stories of the others that live/lived on the land before they took it over.