[55-5] Virtual Physical Penetration Test - Part 5: Access Controlled

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 23 ноя 2020
  • After successfully translating the binary Wiegand data to hex and cloning the credential you make your way further into the facility only to meet another roadblock.

Комментарии • 12

  • @PocketWomen
    @PocketWomen 3 года назад +11

    Finally one I might know. The tool would be the plastic shim. This is a fun series thanks for all the work you have put in. Cheers

    • @amihirata
      @amihirata  3 года назад +7

      You got it! Thank you for the kind words, I’m glad people are having fun with it!

  • @jaimemunoz5920
    @jaimemunoz5920 3 года назад +2

    Some kind of shim such as a piece of plastic from a milk jug or a credit card or a flyswatter part. Hopefully I am thinking of the door opening away in the right way.

  • @AquaTech225
    @AquaTech225 3 года назад +1

    This was pretty cool. I dont know a damn thing about badge readers. Wish I did. Still enjoyed the vid

  • @aettic
    @aettic Год назад

    I guess I would try a thin plastic shim, since I could push and just slip it.

  • @williamcornell3599
    @williamcornell3599 3 года назад +3

    A mica shim

  • @flywifiguy
    @flywifiguy 3 года назад +1

    Ok, I've been grappling with this for a few minutes trying to follow. Firstly would it be correct to let the ProxMark software do this for you using the lf hid weigand 0 42 1337 then copying the hex value out of the 26 bit return, as you demonstrated in your video #12?
    Secondly, when I use the weigand calculator located at www.ccdesignworks.com/wiegand_calc.htm to convert the facility code 42 and the card number 1337 to hex, I get 2540A73. When I convert that back to binary (it's a perfect 26 bits) and add the 12 bit HID identifier 100000000001 to the front of the string, then convert that back to hex, I get 2006540A73 which is one bit flipped from your result. What am I missing?

    • @amihirata
      @amihirata  3 года назад +3

      That's a great question. I took a look and it seems the calculator at the link assigns the wrong parity bit on the end, not your fault at all! The tail end parity bit should be a zero not a one, and that would then give you the right result. I'm not sure why the website is giving you the wrong tail end parity bit.

    • @AquaTech225
      @AquaTech225 3 года назад

      Lol completely lost I am

  • @Wesrl
    @Wesrl 3 года назад +1

    Carolina roller

    • @amihirata
      @amihirata  3 года назад +1

      Ah, but the door opens away from you! 😉

  • @ctbch
    @ctbch 3 года назад

    A piece of plastic