Sir aap ko favorite imam ibn Taymiyyah His Self-Contradiction and Pure Shirk in Minhaajus Sunnah Imam Ibn Taimiyyah says in Minhaajus Sunnatin Nabawiyyah: “If you tell us that we have affirmed non-eternal entities for Allah, our response to you is, ‘Yes’. This is our declaration which the Shariah and intelligences point out.” In it (Al-Minhaaj) he furthermore says: “…Negation of the possibility of non-eternal entities not having a beginning is an unprecedented approach in the Shariah by the consensus of the Ulama of the Sunnah. It is a dangerous and dreaded approach intellectually. In fact, it is decried by numerous parties.” At another place (in Al-Minhaaj) he says: “Thus, it is not possible for something of this universe to be eternal, although it is permissible for the species of non-eternal entities to be perpetual from eternity. The reason for this is that eternity is not defined as a limited entity. On the contrary, every set time is preceded by another time. Thus, it does not follow from the perpetuity of the species the eternity of a given object.” From this it is obvious that Imam Ibn Taymiyyah acknowledges and believes in the timelessness of the individual members of species without specification. Despite a specific member perishing, the membership of the species is eternal in his stupid, irrational theory. His contention, ‘it is not possible for something of this universe to be eternal’, is therefore, a manifest self-contradiction in that the procession of donkeys is never-ending, for if it would ever end, the logical conclusion would be the annihilation of the species, and this is negated by Imam Ibn Taymiyyah’s corrupt kufr belief of the eternity of the genus of things. This is the gist of what he is saying, together with what Al-Jalaal Ad-Dawwaani quoted from him in Kitaabu Sharhil Adhudiyyah, that: “I have seen in some script of Ibn Taymiyyah this statement of his - i.e. timelessness of the genus - in regard to the Arsh.” In other words, he (Ibn Taymiyyah) believes that the genus of Arsh is eternal - never was there an Arsh but an Arsh existed before the previous Arsh from eternity, and that an Arsh comes into being then becomes non-existent then comes into being then becomes non-existent ad infinitum. Simply put, the genus of Arsh is eternal and eternally existed with Allah. Whilst the existence of a specific Arsh at this present moment of time is non-eternal, the species of Arsh, however, is eternal. Thus, the species which is also ‘something of this universe’ is eternal. The self-contradiction of Ibn Taymiyyah is therefore conspicuous. Just as the individual members of the species, e.g. a black donkey, a brown donkey, etc., are entities of the universe, so too is the donkey species an entity of the world because without individual donkeys there can be no donkey species in existence. The postulate that the donkey species is not of the universe, hence is eternal, is pure shirk to which Ibn Taymiyyah subscribed. Elsewhere in Al-Minhaaj he says: “Some say that it is with the will and power of Allah - that is, the action of Allah is with His will and power - one after the other. However, He was always attributed with it (action). Thus, it (the action of Allah) is noneternal in relation to the individual members, and timeless (eternal) in species, as is the view of the Imaams of the Ahl Hadeeth and others, viz. the followers of Shaafi’, Ahmad and other groups.” Just look at this fabrication and blatant falsehood! It is his old habit of attributing fabricated and vile statements to the Muhadditheen. He is completely alone in this (fabrication), conforming only to the later philosophers. But he attributes a pure fabrication to the Muhadditheen and Fuqaha of the Shaafi’, Hambali and other Madhabs. He in fact slanders them. None of them ever proclaimed this stark kufr which Ibn Taymiyyah attributes to them.
اللہ تعالیٰ آپ کو سلامت رکھے آمین
Àapne dimagh khol diya. Alhamdulillah.
Allah grant Shyakh Abu rizwan the greatest rank in jannah for this lecture. جزاك الله خيرا
MA SHA ALLAH ❤️
JAZAK ALLAH KHIRA
Mashallah
Beshak
masha Allah barak Allah
Masha Allah boht umda bayan hai
abu rizwan saheb koallah salamat rakhe
Masha Allah shaikh
JazakAllahu khaira!
بہت معلوماتی بیان ہے
جزاک اللہ خیرا کثیرا
MashaaAllah ALLAH subhanahu Aap k ilm me Barkat dein aur umar me Barkat dein
Aameen ya Rabbul Aalamein
جزاك الله خيرا و بارك الله فيكم
Aameen
شكرًا جزيلًا وجزاكم ٱللّٰه خيرًا وأحسن ٱللّٰه إليكم ورضي ٱلرَّحمٰن عنكم وأرضاكم ،
ٱللّٰهم آمين يَا رَبَّ ٱلعَالَمِين
Masha allah
मासा अलाह
Masallah
Qqpqq²z
Alhadulillah
Sab log bahot bure hain
Ye ache hain
Ye humesha keede nikalte hain
Assalamualaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa barakatahu
Please send complete lecture
👇
ruclips.net/video/LTeIBob18Os/видео.html
@@SheikhAbuRizwanMuhammadi jazakallahu khair
Thumnail par Ahle hadees firqe ke aalim ka photo reh gya
👍 क़ुरान ए पाक में कितनी बार अक़्ल के इस्तेमाल पे जोर दीया गया है??? 👍
Mujhe apne doubts clear karna hai, kya in ka number milega
Sir aap ko favorite imam ibn Taymiyyah
His Self-Contradiction and Pure Shirk in Minhaajus Sunnah
Imam Ibn Taimiyyah says in Minhaajus Sunnatin Nabawiyyah: “If you tell us that we have affirmed non-eternal entities for Allah, our response to you is, ‘Yes’. This is our declaration which the Shariah and intelligences point out.”
In it (Al-Minhaaj) he furthermore says: “…Negation of the possibility of non-eternal entities not having a beginning is an unprecedented approach in the Shariah by the consensus of the Ulama of the Sunnah. It is a dangerous and dreaded approach intellectually. In fact, it is decried by numerous parties.”
At another place (in Al-Minhaaj) he says: “Thus, it is not possible for something of this universe to be eternal, although it is permissible for the species of non-eternal entities to be perpetual from eternity. The reason for this is that eternity is not defined as a limited entity. On the contrary, every set time is preceded by another time. Thus, it does not follow from the perpetuity of the species the eternity of a given object.”
From this it is obvious that Imam Ibn Taymiyyah acknowledges and believes in the timelessness of the individual members of species without specification. Despite a specific member perishing, the membership of the species is eternal in his stupid, irrational theory. His contention, ‘it is not possible for something of this universe to be eternal’, is therefore, a manifest self-contradiction in that the procession of donkeys is never-ending, for if it would ever end, the logical conclusion would be the annihilation of the species, and this is negated by Imam Ibn Taymiyyah’s corrupt kufr belief of the eternity of the genus of things. This is the gist of what he is saying, together with what Al-Jalaal Ad-Dawwaani quoted from him in Kitaabu Sharhil Adhudiyyah, that: “I have seen in some script of Ibn Taymiyyah this statement of his - i.e. timelessness of the genus - in regard to the Arsh.” In other words, he (Ibn Taymiyyah) believes that the genus of Arsh is eternal - never was there an Arsh but an Arsh existed before the previous Arsh from eternity, and that an Arsh comes into being then becomes non-existent then comes into being then becomes non-existent ad infinitum. Simply put, the genus of Arsh is eternal and eternally existed with Allah. Whilst the existence of a specific Arsh at this present moment of time is non-eternal, the species of Arsh, however, is eternal. Thus, the species which is also ‘something of this universe’ is eternal. The self-contradiction of Ibn Taymiyyah is therefore conspicuous. Just as the individual members of the species, e.g. a black donkey, a brown donkey, etc., are entities of the universe, so too is the donkey species an entity of the world because without individual donkeys there can be no donkey species in existence.
The postulate that the donkey species is not of the universe, hence is eternal, is pure shirk to which Ibn Taymiyyah subscribed.
Elsewhere in Al-Minhaaj he says: “Some say that it is with the will and power of Allah - that is, the action of Allah is with His will and power - one after the other. However, He was always attributed with it (action). Thus, it (the action of Allah) is noneternal in relation to the individual members, and timeless (eternal) in species, as is the view of the Imaams of the Ahl Hadeeth and others, viz. the followers of Shaafi’, Ahmad and other groups.” Just look at this fabrication and blatant falsehood! It is his old habit of attributing fabricated and vile statements to the Muhadditheen. He is completely alone in this (fabrication), conforming only to the later philosophers. But he attributes a pure fabrication to the Muhadditheen and Fuqaha of the Shaafi’, Hambali and other Madhabs. He in fact slanders them. None of them ever proclaimed this stark kufr which Ibn Taymiyyah attributes to them.
Ibn Khaldun was Ash'ari
मेरे भाइयो कुरान को और हदीसे रसूल को फिरका ना समझो
MA SHA ALLAH ❤️
JAZAK ALLAH KHIRA