The German foreign minister also made a comment to Ahmed Al Sharah. She said " All sects/groups should be included in the new Syrian government " He responded " muslim minorities should also be included/represented in the German government "
Great response to someone who has no rights to impose their ideas on another sovereign nation. To her, shut your mouth and look at your own country first.
It's actually stupid, waisting energy is one thing, but you have to change people's opinions for any progress to happen, and no one really wants to change their opinions. You actually need to work on understanding the other party and reason with their concerns. What you/she advocated for is just ignorance and mutual antagonization - what everybody's doing.
If we could, (and only Allah can) transpost the malinnial gen and all later gens back to the 70s/80s in the west, they would all think they were shipped to some strange exotic foreign land... Growing up in the 70s and 80s, if a young female wore makeup outside and dressed in tight clothing everyone knew she was not decent.... This is during the San Diego majoritu white era in SoCal... The 90s was when degeneracy started to go into overdrive..
Indeed. I recall that. Today the insistence of some people of their right to hug people of the opposite sex is similarly inappropriate. The tradition of shaking hands in the west was to verify that the other person was unarmed. Women were not viewed as being threatening so in some ways not shaking hands should be a sign of trust.
We watch shows from the 50s and 60s with our children. Women and men mostly didn't shake hands then. This is a new introduction to Western culture - definitely wasn't a part of traditional Western culture.
He did not shake her hand not because she is a woman. it's because she is a woman who is not related to him. If the German foreign minister was his niece, he would have shaken her hand. A Muslim woman would do the same with a man who is not a close relative.
@@meggrobi are you syrian tho? If not then your word don't hold any weight and doesn't represent them. But sure call it what you want. Whatever please your throat i guess.
Some cultures kiss on the lips, would they be ok with exchanging lips with countries who do that? Don't impose your ways on us and think that you are better or more 'evolved'. Great words from Gai Eaton, and a fantastic video reminding us on what modesty means to us. The headlines are tiring, but sadly not shocking as we know 'they' hate us.
They are okay with supporting war crimes and crimes against humanity. But they think it immoral, that this man should respect a woman so and not touch her body.
Oh dear, they would have accused him of SA if he dared to do that, it's just that they are against islam and arabs in general, because they want Muslims to look bad so they use it as an excuse whenever they want to bless the rest of us with demokhracy( oil, natural resources, slurp, slurp 🤤)
Regarding the statements made by the German Foreign Minister about Syria: Two years ago, Germany lifted the ban on arms sales to Saudi Arabia. When asked if this meant that human rights had improved in Saudi Arabia, they responded: "We are just in need of some cash." Human rights, for the West, are not an end in themselves but rather a tool for discrimination and exploitation of other countries.
I truly enjoy your rants - they are always on important topics - and you share profound and thought provoking analysis to the world. Always showing the media the other - true side!
It was narrated that Ma`qil ibn Yassar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “For one of you to be stabbed in the head with an iron needle is better for him than that he should touch a woman who is not permissible for him.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir, 486. Shaykh Al-Albani classed it as authentic in Sahih Al-Jami`, 5045.) This fabricated scandal caused by the Syrian leader's refrain from shaking the hand of the German Foreign Minister who is a woman is just another manifestation of the Western media's ant-islamic agenda. There is neither embarrassment nor snub in choosing not to offer her a handshake. To the credit of the Foreign Minister, she must have anticipated that aspect of the protocol and did not put her hand forward. If only there was unity in the Ummah in adhering to this aspect of the Shariah, these bigoted media establishments would not have had a reason to fabricate this so-called scandal, which wasn't.
`A'isha said God's messenger was not unseemly or lewd in his language, nor was he loud-voiced in the streets, nor did he return evil for evil, but he would forgive and pardon. Tirmidhi transmitted it.
Thank you for helping us understand why Islam forbids certain acts. The media is determined to spread lies because its goal is to prevent Islam from being viewed positively by the population. Thank you Paul for spending your valuable time explaining the story to your audience.
I would worry more about your "bro" at HTS being rebranded western proxy Al Qaeda, you know, the same HTS/Al Qaeda with the Saudi cleric Muhaysni posting videos of sending gullible kids as suicide bombers and also "cubs of the caliphate" using kids as cannon fodder.
The last thing any of these news outlets want is to portray the truth. Their main objective is so trigger an emotional response from their reader/viewer in the hopes that it would create societal division.
She did not appear to be upset. He looked at her and politely nodded and put his hand on his heart out of respect and then they went on to have talks abiut significant issues. Different Muslims from various belief systems may make different decisions about handshakes in different contexts. Such a trivial issue that overshadows the actual news about the substantive issues they surely discussed.
Didn't he even bow his head while placing his hand at his heart? I personally found it a highly respectable gesture, nothing short of the handshaking to the men 😊
@@danielaknuth8478 Why did he refuse to bow his head and put hand on heart to the men! Not fair! He was discriminating against the men and giving preferential treatment to the woman! The argument can go both ways.😅
As you said, it's a trivial thing which the media amplified. I read on Yahoo News that the German foreign minister herself rejected it being a scandal and said that she had already anticipated it before meeting Al-Shara'
He put his hand on his heart and looked her in the eye. The 10 years in the Middle East and in Syria I like the Arab men way of greetings much prefer it to hand shake. Germans are very uneducated on these matters. She turned up in bullied proof vest and she was advices hence she did not reach her hand out.
Even if the leader shakes those hands, they will still find fault with him. Afterward, they will not give Syria any thing Allah didn't mark for them. Those people have been staying every hazardous condition for entire Ashaad rule. Allah that has kept them surviving InshaAllah will still be with them.
I heard none was threatening Muslims in their country but they are threatening Jewish country So I do not understand who we are criticising now for what 😂😊
This is like getting offended by a hindu who doesnt want to eat the beef you ’made for him’. Why can’t the west just understand religious and cultural differences?
Nooooo they must enforce their 'freedom', 'liberty' and 'democracy' onto the whole world and shame those who deny it. They will force you to be 'free' 😂
They are angry because he did not submit to their standards, which suggests that Syria will have independent policies and an identity that is neither modern nor liberal, it might be an example of other countries in the future and that threatens their influence and control over that geopolitically important part of the world.
The use of Chinese technology by Islamic governments contradicts the principles of the ummah by: • Ignoring the oppression of Uyghur Muslims. • Undermining Islamic sovereignty through reliance on an external, non-Islamic power. • Supporting tools originally designed to suppress Muslim populations. If the ummah is to remain true to its ideals, Muslim nations must critically evaluate their dependence on Chinese technology and prioritize collective solidarity and sovereignty over short-term economic and political gains. Otherwise, the concept of the ummah risks becoming a rhetorical tool rather than a lived reality. Contradictory interpretation as usually make up a fatwa like for car insurance 😂
Our Prophet ﷺ said “Whoever recites Ayatul Kursi immediately after each prescribed prayer, there will be nothing standing between him and his entering Paradise except death." Dont forget to recite Ayatul kursi before sleep Our Prophet ﷺ said, When you go to your bed, recite Ayatul Kursi and you will be protected by Allah, and no devil will come near you until morning (5010) Narrated by al-Bukhari Take screenshot and share to earn reward (it allows you to copy and paste easily), and spread this message to also earn rewards by directing others towards good In’Sha’Allah, maybe Allah could make this a means to grant us Jannaht Ul Firdaus Ameen
Good post , yes Europe and Americans are very ignorant to others "customary practices". I'm not sure if government officials or diplomatic corps are educated in this customary practices
Thank you Paul for telling the truth and actually what the reality of this situation was. The west are so worried about a handshake as opposed to the ongoing Gen0cide. Just let the Syrians live their lives!! They don't need Germany of all countries around!!
That super respectful greeting of the 3 Muslim gentlemen to that woman that i thought was a news reporter or something like that (didnt think she was representing a country) was the most elegant, beautiful thing ive seen on screen when it comes to men geeting a woman. Alhamdulillah for Islam!
You should have included a short clip of it and the interview afterward that she gave to the media. If you look at the video, she HERSELF KNEW that muslim men are not allowed to make physical contact with women who are not his immediate family or if it is not in an emergency situation. Also, you can look at the gestures that the Syrian leader gave her as a replacement of a handshake. - He looks at her in the eyes. - He smiled at her. - He bowed his head to her. - He puts his hand on his chest as a replacement of a handshake. Even her response tells you that she acknowledged it. She knew she shouldn't offer him a handshake. She clasped her hands together and responded to his gestures by lifting her clasped hand up. She even said it in the interview with the media afterward. She said she knew about it and understood it AND RESPECTED THE MUSLIM RELIGION. This is the biggest double standard and hypocritical problem. The Western world preaches equality and rights. But for some reason, you are not allowed to follow anything else but the Western standards. Muslims men don't give handshake to women who are strangers to them. "It is disrespectful of our Western culture." WHAT ABOUT THE MUSLIM RELIGION AND CULTURE? Are we not equal, and all have our own rights? So why are the Western world and culture not respecting the Muslim/Islam as a religion and culture? Where is the democracy that the West kept selling to everyone then? It's more like hypocracy to me.
The German foreign minister had no respect and dignity for the head of state she was meeting. Instead she was dressed like someone going to meet friends at a local cafe.
I watched that video a few times and AB didn't extend her hand to shake his. She opened BOTH hands palm outwards close to her body, not extended. It looked to me more like an acknowledgement to him that she knew not to shake his hand - if that makes sense. He definitely acknowledged her with a nod and put his hand to his heart, which looked to me like a gesture of respect. It was not a snub.
Well noted. How many people would think like you though? ☺️ That is why it is so easy to sow division and discord between people, most people don’t think and just judge prematurely, but the fact that mainstream newspapers have been doing it in the West for so long is absolutely shameful. It shows their lack of standards and their hidden agendas.
If you look closely, you will see that the frenchman didn't put his hand out either, ending up in a finger shake. She went to a muslim country dressed like that ....disrespectful
Like what - in a bikini? Mini skirt? See-through clothing? What is the matter with you that you take offense to a woman who is clothed formally from neck to toe? Look inside your own heart and reflect on your respect for women outside of how one May choose to dress!
I remember when my son was engaged with an iranian woman and he had to learn not to shake her grandmother's hand. When in Rome right? It is about respect. I did not notice the handshake but i saw video of this and thought it odd that men were in suits, more formal dress, and she was not, not to mention head uncovered. After all she is a representative of government and should follow protocols.
A non-Muslim women does not have to cover her hair, as Islamic shariah only applies to Muslims, it does not force it upon a non-Muslim - that would be wrong. Of course what happens in many Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Afghanistan, etc need not necessarily reflect Islamic law but the law as imposed by Muslim men, which are two distinct and separate aspects.
*The USA/collective Western plot is always the same.* The people of the Greater Middle East, including the Levant (most of whom are Semites, and the followers of Abrahamic religions) have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. *Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common.* Strategically ambiguous outsiders make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople, then during WW1 the seat of POWER playing these games changed to London/Paris (Sykes-Picot/Balfour Declaration/WW1), then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, starting around the time a bark by Washington DC in 1956 (Suez Crisis/War) showed who the new boss was, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire ME was the playground during the Cold War). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the ME, in order to _rule over the dissent_ which is classical divide-and-rule. Today, their leaders are ALL tools. Draw lines on the map without asking any of those affected. Exploit and foster endless wars, meddle for constant dissent. *Divide-and-rule connects the dots on the timeline of history.* Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of distance from the events resulting out of the own meddling and political activities, being able to reach all the other regions, but could not be reached itself as hegemony, at any given point of a historical timeline? Pax Romana, Rome. Pax Britannica, London. Pax Americana, Washington DC. All they ever wanted was *pax,* because they said so, but who picks up the *pieces of great wealth and the systemic gains* when all the others can be avoided from uniting? *Different Empires. Different era. Same games...* ------------------------------------- The people of the Africa have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Tribalism makes it easy to divide people, then keep them poor under the "kind foot" of exploitation. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople in North Africa, then during the era of Western imperialism the seat of POWER playing these games changed to the USA/Europe, then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, Africa was the playground during the Cold War. Once the dividers had reached peak power for themselves, by simply drawing lines on the map without asking any of those affected (Congo Conference/1884) the own systems of gain could siphon off wealth like a giant vacuum cleaner. The intention was simply to avoid unity in Africa, in order to _rule over the dissent_ which is classical divide-and-rule. During the Cold War, Moscow took on the role of arming the resistance to the colonial dividers. Today, all African dissenters fighting against unity, including some of Africa's own greedy corrupt leaders, are ALL tools. Endless wars, constant dissent. _Give the weak mind money, and they will dance for the outside dividers..._ *Divide-and-rule.* Oldest trick in the book... Different people and systems. Different places on the map. Same games. -------------------------------------- The people of the Americas, including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. In the beginning stages of era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide-and-rule technique of top-down power on the local systems (Aztecs/Incas), and as European colonial powers' influence decreased during the 19th century, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC. As the own power increased incrementally, the entire world became the playground after around 1900. Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide-and-rule games on their neighbours. *Forget nukes. The divide-and-control/rule/conquer strategy is the most powerful force on the planet, because it can be employed equally in times of peace to CONTROL, in times of crises to RULE, and in times of war to CONQUER.* Ever since the two-faced snake slithered down that tree of unity (fable), speaking out of both sides of the mouth (lies, deceit), the wisest human beings have fruitlessly warned, and the easily divisable have continuously been warned against divisions within a peaceful status quo. When you bow to the division caused by deception, you will lose the good life..."and much that once was, is lost; for none now live who remember it." Such divisions create GAIN for OUTSIDERS (Eden as a system divided by lies and deceit). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide-and-rule. Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror" (sic.), constant dissent with everything's a war war war... Insert levers of lies, mistrust. The *two-party-duopoly* is two cheeks of the same golden hind which set out to create favourites: Favouritism, by granting access to the own POWER/WEALTH, to those who volunteer to act as proxies and extensions for the own power projection. The small picture lives of domestic political chaos, of the big picture reality of international insanity. Point the systemic (MSM) finger, everywhere else, by use of the own paid stooges of power by presenting their deep state-orchestrated three-letter-agency astroturfed violence on multiple tiers as being the reactions of "the poor oppressed people, who need our help for freedom and democracy" (sic.). Liars, deceivers, creators of the BLACK LEGEND for the "other side". *In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity."* Kennan: A prototype GLOBALIST. And that is what they did to increase their own wealth. Set up people against each other, then siphon off the wealth of entire regions of the planet. *And that is what you are fighting for. That is what the hegemon has always done, pretending to be the "good pax", but playing "good cop/bad cop" with the world, from a position of power.* In the past, the "good cops" were the INTERNATIONALISTS, and the "bad cops" were the IMPERIALISTS. In the present that has morphed into the "good cops" being the GLOBALISTS/NEOLIBS, and the "bad cops" being the NEOCONS. Name-branding and doublespeak for the slumberland plebs, enchanted by their "bread-and-circuses"-existences. America's friends and self-proclaimed default rivals in Eurasia are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues, with a (quote) "pattern of relationships" which are beneficial to the own rule. Set up European and Eurasian nations (including the Middle East/North Africa) against each other. It is how divide-and-rule is implemented. The imperialist playbook of Great Britain and the USA for more than 100 years. Read Halford Mackinder (Pivot of History, 1904) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Grand Chessboard, 1997) regarding Eurasia for the template. Read W.T. Stead (Americanization of the World, 1901) for the guideline of political-, cultural- and economic capture. Read Smedley-Butler (War is a Racket) for the modus operandi of imperialism/militarism. Some say Europe is a divine goddess. I say, it is a humble apple tree, from an allegory as old as modern civilizations, because it is easy to divide. *Divide and Rule.* Oldest trick in the book... Four corners of the globe. Different cultures and religions. Same games. THE LINK OF THE WORLD. The entire system they favor in the USA/collective West is based on a pre-set *managed and moderated division,* for the benefit of a very few at the top of the pyramids accompanied by the often-repeated nice-sounding storyline. Create the script of the own heroes. Their entire scripted money-funded history sounds like a Hollywood superhero movie that sounds too good to be true. Guess what? It is. It is what they are NOT telling you, that they try to hide. Who wields the POWER? Who has had the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? Create the default rival/enemy on their own marching routes. It is usually the power most likely to succeed which is determined as the default rival/enemy. Notice how, as soon as a rival starts mass-producing products high up in the value chain of capitalism, and starts vying for markets, and becomes successful, it immediately becomes the systemic rival, and is then geopolitically encircled by the greater empire. It happened around 1900, as Germany started building high-value products, and it happened around 2000, as China started moving away from building cheap toys and labor intensive kitchen appliances... The games start on the home turf. The first victims are their own people in the USA/collective West, locked in the eternal struggle for wealth and personal gain which they have been deceived into thinking is "good greed", but which WILL be exploited by the snakes who deceive them on the domestic tier of the divide-and-rule system of power. Because ..."most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place." - Walter E. Williams *War is a great **_divider._** It goes straight through the heads of millions and billions of people from the very top tiers, right down to the individual level. War divides alignments and alliances, goes straight through organizations, divides political parties, tears through families, and finally at the very bottom tier, goes straight through individual hearts and minds as individuals struggle with themselves.*
The respect of muslim men to their muslim women is of the highest standards by not touching them in any way if they are not part of their family. Not touching any non-Muslim women is also saying that muslim men also respect them as high as muslim women.
Even today in most western countries, etiquette is women will offer the hand first with a man (i.e she get to choose to go for a handshake or not). In their men=women world, that's a bit discriminatory if the man doesn't get to choose as well.
![Ceremony honoring President Jimmy Carter at US Capitol [RAW]](/img/1.gif)
The German foreign minister also made a comment to Ahmed Al Sharah. She said " All sects/groups should be included in the new Syrian government "
He responded " muslim minorities should also be included/represented in the German government "
Great response to someone who has no rights to impose their ideas on another sovereign nation. To her, shut your mouth and look at your own country first.
i do shake women hands as a Muslims but there are conservative sect in islam and the west will accept their sovereignty
Muslime mals don't shake women hands@@asemalshoura519
Boom. Drops the mic.
@@TaiguRyu Yep and then talk to the hand lady 🫷
As my aunt used to say, “Don’t waste your energy on people are committed to misunderstanding you!”
Very smart, thanks.
gotta keep this thing in mind : ) thanks
It's actually stupid, waisting energy is one thing, but you have to change people's opinions for any progress to happen, and no one really wants to change their opinions. You actually need to work on understanding the other party and reason with their concerns.
What you/she advocated for is just ignorance and mutual antagonization - what everybody's doing.
@@duncan.o-vic - What can you do if they are *COMMITTED* to their ignorance?
@@I_Offend_Snowflakes Find out why?
And if they really are, or if you aren't the one committed to ignorance...
They don’t provide context not because they don’t know it, but because context would defeat their purpose of pushing such narrative. Great video!
Well explained
You really know them, they are hypocrites
What context?🥴
It was a political meeting, not a disco
@tbishop4961 so if it's a political meeting we should disobey THE ALMIGHTY to please HIS CREATION?
@@tbishop4961 Nice attempt, but try harder next time
Daily mail isn’t too fussed about the massacre of women and children in Palestine but this stuff really gets their blood boiling 🥵
True indeed!
They celebrate it.
Well said.
They hate true Muslim
Bunch of genocidal hypocrites
I remember when I was a little girl in the 1980's, women didn't shake hands with men. It's a very new thing to do.
Unfortunately another way to exploit the woman making them feel like they are Equal to man😢😢😢😢
If we could, (and only Allah can) transpost the malinnial gen and all later gens back to the 70s/80s in the west, they would all think they were shipped to some strange exotic foreign land...
Growing up in the 70s and 80s, if a young female wore makeup outside and dressed in tight clothing everyone knew she was not decent....
This is during the San Diego majoritu white era in SoCal...
The 90s was when degeneracy started to go into overdrive..
Interesting
Indeed. I recall that.
Today the insistence of some people of their right to hug people of the opposite sex is similarly inappropriate.
The tradition of shaking hands in the west was to verify that the other person was unarmed. Women were not viewed as being threatening so in some ways not shaking hands should be a sign of trust.
We watch shows from the 50s and 60s with our children. Women and men mostly didn't shake hands then. This is a new introduction to Western culture - definitely wasn't a part of traditional Western culture.
Funny how when it comes to abortion they will say "My body my choice" yet then here will demand a handshake and be offended if it is not given.
"His hand his choice" totally makes sense.
To the point!
she be like "i will play my women card as always its not his choice his body womens choice lol"
Wow!!!
To the point😂😂😂😂
Western media is the "Biggest Karen" EVER !
😂
Western society is a big karen. Its all about dictating how others should do things
At least they report whatever they like . Unlike Muslim newspapers or media that come from places like Saud Arabia. Yemen, Egypt and the list goes on.
@@Rage_Harder_Then_Relax i would tell you to go watch al Jazeera, but you already picked a side.
@Rage_Harder_Then_Relax what would happen if i criticize 🇮🇱 of the massacre of Palestinians in Europe?
The German government is now trying to teach us morality 😂
Germany that took in over 1 million Syrian refugees in 2015, theirs your morality.
It's not about morality. This was a political meeting
@@tbishop4961the media headlines SHOUTED morality everywhere
@@tbishop4961 Islam is a way of life that includes politics.
@@ucfmayl802 the millions of refugees in the west know who has the moral high ground.
The double standards are glaring
DEATHENING
He did not shake her hand not because she is a woman. it's because she is a woman who is not related to him. If the German foreign minister was his niece, he would have shaken her hand.
A Muslim woman would do the same with a man who is not a close relative.
CORRECT
"SUPERB" Explanation,!!! Exactly 💯 Correct!!!
they bow when they go to Japan but moan and complain when they go to muslim lands
Because the subdued and conquered Japan they are ok with it. But if Japan was like China best believe they wouldn’t do that
Great
Syria was a secular country, not a muslin caliphate.
@@meggrobiwhere? in lala land?
@@meggrobi are you syrian tho? If not then your word don't hold any weight and doesn't represent them. But sure call it what you want. Whatever please your throat i guess.
Masha Allah. May Allah Bless and Reward you in this Life and in the Hereafter.
Yes , with 72 virgins.
آمین یارب العالمین
In the olde days especially in the Eastern part of the globe, bowing while holding your heart is the highest gesture of respect towards your peers.
Everyone should do this. All Western people should follow this. If they don't agree, they must be considered to be colonial and supremacist.
Good to know that 👍
I'm going to do this from now. It's the best
Right? I also do that
Nice comment.
Wallahi brother paul is doing an outstanding job against the media propaganda!! Kudos to you sir. May ALLAH bless you for your efforts ! Ameen.
Happy you make this kind of video. You should make this a segment. A lot of people are mislead about Islam because of the media
True
Some cultures kiss on the lips, would they be ok with exchanging lips with countries who do that? Don't impose your ways on us and think that you are better or more 'evolved'. Great words from Gai Eaton, and a fantastic video reminding us on what modesty means to us. The headlines are tiring, but sadly not shocking as we know 'they' hate us.
Great, i like that
They are okay with supporting war crimes and crimes against humanity. But they think it immoral, that this man should respect a woman so and not touch her body.
Oh dear, they would have accused him of SA if he dared to do that, it's just that they are against islam and arabs in general, because they want Muslims to look bad so they use it as an excuse whenever they want to bless the rest of us with demokhracy( oil, natural resources, slurp, slurp 🤤)
Regarding the statements made by the German Foreign Minister about Syria:
Two years ago, Germany lifted the ban on arms sales to Saudi Arabia. When asked if this meant that human rights had improved in Saudi Arabia, they responded: "We are just in need of some cash."
Human rights, for the West, are not an end in themselves but rather a tool for discrimination and exploitation of other countries.
Glad you raised the issue. Thanks.
I truly enjoy your rants - they are always on important topics - and you share profound and thought provoking analysis to the world. Always showing the media the other - true side!
Alhamdulillah
Hardly a rant duh
@@BloggingTheologyWhy have you pinned this one? Vanity?
Beneficial and illuminating discourse more like
It was narrated that Ma`qil ibn Yassar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “For one of you to be stabbed in the head with an iron needle is better for him than that he should touch a woman who is not permissible for him.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir, 486. Shaykh Al-Albani classed it as authentic in Sahih Al-Jami`, 5045.)
This fabricated scandal caused by the Syrian leader's refrain from shaking the hand of the German Foreign Minister who is a woman is just another manifestation of the Western media's ant-islamic agenda.
There is neither embarrassment nor snub in choosing not to offer her a handshake. To the credit of the Foreign Minister, she must have anticipated that aspect of the protocol and did not put her hand forward.
If only there was unity in the Ummah in adhering to this aspect of the Shariah, these bigoted media establishments would not have had a reason to fabricate this so-called scandal, which wasn't.
Trouble makers create trouble, anyone surprised?
You are right brother.
We hugs and kisses cheeks of our mothers, our sisters, our aunts, our grandmothers, our daughters and off course our wife
Also, to please our mothers we get paradise as reward.
`A'isha said God's messenger was not unseemly or lewd in his language, nor was he loud-voiced in the streets, nor did he return evil for evil, but he would forgive and pardon.
Tirmidhi transmitted it.
But consumed their marriage when she was at the ripe age of 9!😮
Thank you for helping us understand why Islam forbids certain acts. The media is determined to spread lies because its goal is to prevent Islam from being viewed positively by the population. Thank you Paul for spending your valuable time explaining the story to your audience.
What is it with Germans and co-ed handshakes?! They actually refused a Muslim brother citizenship for not being willing to shake a woman's hand.
Germans are quite backward and medieval in that sense.
they wanted a “me too” scandal in Syria lol our brother didn’t fall for it! haha
I would worry more about your "bro" at HTS being rebranded western proxy Al Qaeda, you know, the same HTS/Al Qaeda with the Saudi cleric Muhaysni posting videos of sending gullible kids as suicide bombers and also "cubs of the caliphate" using kids as cannon fodder.
😂😂😂, your " brother" he is a m0ss@d @gent.
😂😂😂
They don't need to create a scandal. Most women in Syria probably have a real life "me too" moment, as do most women in Muslim countries.
lol stop projecting!
May Allah bless you Paul Williams.
The last thing any of these news outlets want is to portray the truth. Their main objective is so trigger an emotional response from their reader/viewer in the hopes that it would create societal division.
She did not appear to be upset. He looked at her and politely nodded and put his hand on his heart out of respect and then they went on to have talks abiut significant issues. Different Muslims from various belief systems may make different decisions about handshakes in different contexts. Such a trivial issue that overshadows the actual news about the substantive issues they surely discussed.
PREFER THE HAND ON HEART PERSONALLY
Didn't he even bow his head while placing his hand at his heart? I personally found it a highly respectable gesture, nothing short of the handshaking to the men 😊
@@danielaknuth8478 Why did he refuse to bow his head and put hand on heart to the men! Not fair! He was discriminating against the men and giving preferential treatment to the woman! The argument can go both ways.😅
As you said, it's a trivial thing which the media amplified. I read on Yahoo News that the German foreign minister herself rejected it being a scandal and said that she had already anticipated it before meeting Al-Shara'
In those kind of meetings, people are told in advance what's going to happen. She knew well the Syrian leader wouldn't shake her hand.
If she had already anticipated and knew he would not so why did she give her hand to be shaken?
@@WantToKnow-b1c correct PROTOCOL
@@justj8565 BAITING
@@nicolaablett7790
Thank you, that's the right word.
English Queen doesnt shake hands😂😂
Bravo 👏 as always for Defending TRUTH and removing Falsehood and Fake News 🎉
"Islam and the destiny of man" by Gai Eeaton - a treasure of wisdom.
He put his hand on his heart and looked her in the eye. The 10 years in the Middle East and in Syria I like the Arab men way of greetings much prefer it to hand shake. Germans are very uneducated on these matters. She turned up in bullied proof vest and she was advices hence she did not reach her hand out.
Even if the leader shakes those hands, they will still find fault with him. Afterward, they will not give Syria any thing Allah didn't mark for them. Those people have been staying every hazardous condition for entire Ashaad rule. Allah that has kept them surviving InshaAllah will still be with them.
Long live Syria, Palestine, Sudan and Yemen ❤
I heard none was threatening Muslims in their country but they are threatening Jewish country So I do not understand who we are criticising now for what 😂😊
@@AsusexpI bet you are an American with your nose stuck under some rock in a gutter in the Grand Canyon.😂😂😂
@Asusexp threaten? Watch TANTURA & SETTLER VOILENCE here on RUclips if your open minded.
All accusation is an admission of Zionist.
This is like getting offended by a hindu who doesnt want to eat the beef you ’made for him’.
Why can’t the west just understand religious and cultural differences?
Nooooo they must enforce their 'freedom', 'liberty' and 'democracy' onto the whole world and shame those who deny it. They will force you to be 'free' 😂
We are proud of being Muslims.May Allah elevate the rank of the president of Syria. May Allah honour him.
They are angry because he did not submit to their standards, which suggests that Syria will have independent policies and an identity that is neither modern nor liberal, it might be an example of other countries in the future and that threatens their influence and control over that geopolitically important part of the world.
Proud to be Muslim since 1974 when I was born to Muslim parents 🇸🇳🫶🏿👍🏾Alhamdulillah for Islam
The use of Chinese technology by Islamic governments contradicts the principles of the ummah by:
• Ignoring the oppression of Uyghur Muslims.
• Undermining Islamic sovereignty through reliance on an external, non-Islamic power.
• Supporting tools originally designed to suppress Muslim populations.
If the ummah is to remain true to its ideals, Muslim nations must critically evaluate their dependence on Chinese technology and prioritize collective solidarity and sovereignty over short-term economic and political gains. Otherwise, the concept of the ummah risks becoming a rhetorical tool rather than a lived reality.
Contradictory interpretation as usually make up a fatwa like for car insurance 😂
What is there to be proud of? What achievement have you accomplished? Besides having accidentally been born to Muslim parents.
Salam Aleikum to all my brothers from Dakar to Ziguinchor
Happy to see a Senegalese brother/sister here. Salam on you wherever you are.
What is there to be proud if? What has been your achievement? Besides having accidentally been born to Muslim parents.
unfortunatly, german media is on a clickbait and mischief trip doing a kind of propaganda.
الحمد لله على نعمة الإسلام
نقمة الإسلام
@@BlaBla-ho9iy cry some more, hasbara bot
Jazak Allah kheir brother Paul, keep educating the West about Islam. 😊😊👌👌👌
When I met this scholar in Spain two years ago, i found him to be exceptionally knowledgeable and remarkably humble.
Our Prophet ﷺ said “Whoever recites Ayatul Kursi immediately after each prescribed prayer, there will be nothing standing between him and his entering Paradise except death."
Dont forget to recite Ayatul kursi before sleep Our Prophet ﷺ said, When you go to your bed, recite Ayatul Kursi and you will be protected by Allah, and no devil will come near you until morning (5010) Narrated by al-Bukhari
Take screenshot and share to earn reward (it allows you to copy and paste easily), and spread this message to also earn rewards by directing others towards good In’Sha’Allah, maybe Allah could make this a means to grant us Jannaht Ul Firdaus Ameen
May Allah reward you brother ❤🎉❤
Shukran!!! I was waiting for someone to correct this nonsense they are spinning.
Big up from Morocco 🇲🇦
Good post , yes Europe and Americans are very ignorant to others "customary practices".
I'm not sure if government officials or diplomatic corps are educated in this customary practices
You are a Gem ....brother Paul Williams...may Allah Azzawajal accept your services for Ummah....
PS: That Deutsche Welle gets it wrong is shocking. They are internationally active and ought to know better. I am very disappointed.
It's not shocking to me at all. It's rather their policy being arrogantly eurocentric and racist.
Enjoyed listening to "the rant". Thank you, may Allah bless you!
Alhamdulillah
The more Western media/Politicians try to sensationalize and generate controversy abt Islam, the more popular Islam will get inshAllah!
جزاكم الله خيرا
Conservative Jews openly dont shake women's hands. And the West dont habe a problem with them. Hypocrisy
Assalum alaikum Paul: a useful sharing of the position of Islam which are God given for all humanity.
wa alaikum assalam
She was dressed like she was chillin' at a cafe, not meeting a head of state, why wasn't that mentioned?
Amazing video allahumma barik 👍👍👍👍
Jazaak Allah Khairan
Thanks a lot, Paul!
Thank you Paul for telling the truth and actually what the reality of this situation was. The west are so worried about a handshake as opposed to the ongoing Gen0cide. Just let the Syrians live their lives!! They don't need Germany of all countries around!!
JazakaAllahu khairan brother for the very essential discussions. ❤
respect to the Syrian leader.
he is just another 7ukchead
No context by design
That super respectful greeting of the 3 Muslim gentlemen to that woman that i thought was a news reporter or something like that (didnt think she was representing a country) was the most elegant, beautiful thing ive seen on screen when it comes to men geeting a woman.
Alhamdulillah for Islam!
Thank you brother for raising these questions and enlightening non muslims.
Theyre *SO* butthurt about a handshake😂😂😂
Alhamdulillah
Barak-Allahu feek Brother Paul
Jazaakumullaahu khairan brother Paul
You should have included a short clip of it and the interview afterward that she gave to the media.
If you look at the video, she HERSELF KNEW that muslim men are not allowed to make physical contact with women who are not his immediate family or if it is not in an emergency situation.
Also, you can look at the gestures that the Syrian leader gave her as a replacement of a handshake.
- He looks at her in the eyes.
- He smiled at her.
- He bowed his head to her.
- He puts his hand on his chest as a replacement of a handshake.
Even her response tells you that she acknowledged it. She knew she shouldn't offer him a handshake. She clasped her hands together and responded to his gestures by lifting her clasped hand up.
She even said it in the interview with the media afterward. She said she knew about it and understood it AND RESPECTED THE MUSLIM RELIGION.
This is the biggest double standard and hypocritical problem. The Western world preaches equality and rights. But for some reason, you are not allowed to follow anything else but the Western standards. Muslims men don't give handshake to women who are strangers to them. "It is disrespectful of our Western culture."
WHAT ABOUT THE MUSLIM RELIGION AND CULTURE?
Are we not equal, and all have our own rights?
So why are the Western world and culture not respecting the Muslim/Islam as a religion and culture?
Where is the democracy that the West kept selling to everyone then?
It's more like hypocracy to me.
*_Thanks 4 exposing them_*
Assalaamualaikum. May Allah give you ease and spread your words for you are speaking the truth, brother Paul.
wa alaikum assalam
Asking for intellectual effort from the west is like asking a fish to fly.
Pah...Where was their outrage when the Syrians were being bombed and killed under the previous regime ???
His hand gestures welcoming why they dont see it. If this had been Japan culture they would love it and respect it.
for german newspapers its ok when jews dont shake a womans hand 05:50
The German foreign minister had no respect and dignity for the head of state she was meeting. Instead she was dressed like someone going to meet friends at a local cafe.
Always great content.
Thank you for this video. Excellent explanation. ❤
Alhamdulillah
It was great 😂😂😂 . Alhamdullilah
No woman should also shake hands with Baerback, she is 🧬🧬
☪️☪️☪️ Allahuakhbar Allahuakhbar from Malaysia 🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾🇲🇾
Alhamdullilah for Islam
Keep up the awesome work of educating the masses about Islam. Alhamdulillah!
It should be commonly accepted that Muslims, politicians or not, may not shake hands.
Truly my body my choice
I watched that video a few times and AB didn't extend her hand to shake his. She opened BOTH hands palm outwards close to her body, not extended. It looked to me more like an acknowledgement to him that she knew not to shake his hand - if that makes sense. He definitely acknowledged her with a nod and put his hand to his heart, which looked to me like a gesture of respect. It was not a snub.
Well noted. How many people would think like you though? ☺️
That is why it is so easy to sow division and discord between people, most people don’t think and just judge prematurely, but the fact that mainstream newspapers have been doing it in the West for so long is absolutely shameful. It shows their lack of standards and their hidden agendas.
Thanks for sharing ❤
Totally agree 💯👍
If you look closely, you will see that the frenchman didn't put his hand out either, ending up in a finger shake. She went to a muslim country dressed like that ....disrespectful
Like what - in a bikini? Mini skirt? See-through clothing?
What is the matter with you that you take offense to a woman who is clothed formally from neck to toe? Look inside your own heart and reflect on your respect for women outside of how one May choose to dress!
How disrespectful was Baerbock? Dressed like she's going clubbing.
As a white Western Sufi, I approve this message!
Assalamu aleikum great explanation zazakAllah
wa alaikum assalam
I remember when my son was engaged with an iranian woman and he had to learn not to shake her grandmother's hand. When in Rome right?
It is about respect. I did not notice the handshake but i saw video of this and thought it odd that men were in suits, more formal dress, and she was not, not to mention head uncovered.
After all she is a representative of government and should follow protocols.
A non-Muslim women does not have to cover her hair, as Islamic shariah only applies to Muslims, it does not force it upon a non-Muslim - that would be wrong.
Of course what happens in many Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Afghanistan, etc need not necessarily reflect Islamic law but the law as imposed by Muslim men, which are two distinct and separate aspects.
Paul the amount of reading your do always fascinates me
Remember when European women would curtsie and men would bow?
What happened to that‽
Paul, ASSALAMU Alaikum. . the issue very clearly put forward and very well explained .Tq Sir
wa alaikum assalam
excellent contents ya sayyd
That is the beauty of the islam and respect for womans
*The USA/collective Western plot is always the same.*
The people of the Greater Middle East, including the Levant (most of whom are Semites, and the followers of Abrahamic religions) have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. *Because it is easier to divide people based on personal differences, than it is to unite them, based on what they have in common.* Strategically ambiguous outsiders make use of this, for own advantages. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople, then during WW1 the seat of POWER playing these games changed to London/Paris (Sykes-Picot/Balfour Declaration/WW1), then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, starting around the time a bark by Washington DC in 1956 (Suez Crisis/War) showed who the new boss was, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC (the entire ME was the playground during the Cold War). Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the ME, in order to _rule over the dissent_ which is classical divide-and-rule. Today, their leaders are ALL tools. Draw lines on the map without asking any of those affected. Exploit and foster endless wars, meddle for constant dissent.
*Divide-and-rule connects the dots on the timeline of history.*
Who has had (in all historical cases in the ME/Levant) the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of distance from the events resulting out of the own meddling and political activities, being able to reach all the other regions, but could not be reached itself as hegemony, at any given point of a historical timeline? Pax Romana, Rome. Pax Britannica, London. Pax Americana, Washington DC. All they ever wanted was *pax,* because they said so, but who picks up the *pieces of great wealth and the systemic gains* when all the others can be avoided from uniting?
*Different Empires. Different era. Same games...*
-------------------------------------
The people of the Africa have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. Tribalism makes it easy to divide people, then keep them poor under the "kind foot" of exploitation. In the era of empires, first Rome/Constantinople in North Africa, then during the era of Western imperialism the seat of POWER playing these games changed to the USA/Europe, then after the 1950's as European colonialism's power decreased, Africa was the playground during the Cold War. Once the dividers had reached peak power for themselves, by simply drawing lines on the map without asking any of those affected (Congo Conference/1884) the own systems of gain could siphon off wealth like a giant vacuum cleaner. The intention was simply to avoid unity in Africa, in order to _rule over the dissent_ which is classical divide-and-rule. During the Cold War, Moscow took on the role of arming the resistance to the colonial dividers. Today, all African dissenters fighting against unity, including some of Africa's own greedy corrupt leaders, are ALL tools. Endless wars, constant dissent.
_Give the weak mind money, and they will dance for the outside dividers..._
*Divide-and-rule.*
Oldest trick in the book...
Different people and systems. Different places on the map. Same games.
--------------------------------------
The people of the Americas, including the USA, have been divided and ruled over by outsiders for centuries. In the beginning stages of era of European Imperialism, first Spain and Portugal entered the Americas, employing the divide-and-rule technique of top-down power on the local systems (Aztecs/Incas), and as European colonial powers' influence decreased during the 19th century, the role of divider was simply taken over by Washington DC. As the own power increased incrementally, the entire world became the playground after around 1900. Today, it is the globalists who employ imperialist tools to play divide-and-rule games on their neighbours.
*Forget nukes. The divide-and-control/rule/conquer strategy is the most powerful force on the planet, because it can be employed equally in times of peace to CONTROL, in times of crises to RULE, and in times of war to CONQUER.*
Ever since the two-faced snake slithered down that tree of unity (fable), speaking out of both sides of the mouth (lies, deceit), the wisest human beings have fruitlessly warned, and the easily divisable have continuously been warned against divisions within a peaceful status quo. When you bow to the division caused by deception, you will lose the good life..."and much that once was, is lost; for none now live who remember it." Such divisions create GAIN for OUTSIDERS (Eden as a system divided by lies and deceit).
Now the intention is simply to avoid unity in the Americas, in order to rule over the dissent which is classical divide-and-rule. Endless wars on anything and everything from "drugs" to "terror" (sic.), constant dissent with everything's a war war war...
Insert levers of lies, mistrust. The *two-party-duopoly* is two cheeks of the same golden hind which set out to create favourites: Favouritism, by granting access to the own POWER/WEALTH, to those who volunteer to act as proxies and extensions for the own power projection. The small picture lives of domestic political chaos, of the big picture reality of international insanity. Point the systemic (MSM) finger, everywhere else, by use of the own paid stooges of power by presenting their deep state-orchestrated three-letter-agency astroturfed violence on multiple tiers as being the reactions of "the poor oppressed people, who need our help for freedom and democracy" (sic.). Liars, deceivers, creators of the BLACK LEGEND for the "other side".
*In February 1948, George F. Kennan's Policy Planning Staff said: "[W]e have about 50% of the world's wealth but only 6.3% of its population. ... Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity."* Kennan: A prototype GLOBALIST. And that is what they did to increase their own wealth. Set up people against each other, then siphon off the wealth of entire regions of the planet.
*And that is what you are fighting for. That is what the hegemon has always done, pretending to be the "good pax", but playing "good cop/bad cop" with the world, from a position of power.* In the past, the "good cops" were the INTERNATIONALISTS, and the "bad cops" were the IMPERIALISTS. In the present that has morphed into the "good cops" being the GLOBALISTS/NEOLIBS, and the "bad cops" being the NEOCONS. Name-branding and doublespeak for the slumberland plebs, enchanted by their "bread-and-circuses"-existences.
America's friends and self-proclaimed default rivals in Eurasia are still being burnt to ensure this disparity continues, with a (quote) "pattern of relationships" which are beneficial to the own rule. Set up European and Eurasian nations (including the Middle East/North Africa) against each other. It is how divide-and-rule is implemented. The imperialist playbook of Great Britain and the USA for more than 100 years. Read Halford Mackinder (Pivot of History, 1904) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Grand Chessboard, 1997) regarding Eurasia for the template. Read W.T. Stead (Americanization of the World, 1901) for the guideline of political-, cultural- and economic capture. Read Smedley-Butler (War is a Racket) for the modus operandi of imperialism/militarism.
Some say Europe is a divine goddess. I say, it is a humble apple tree, from an allegory as old as modern civilizations, because it is easy to divide.
*Divide and Rule.*
Oldest trick in the book...
Four corners of the globe. Different cultures and religions. Same games.
THE LINK OF THE WORLD.
The entire system they favor in the USA/collective West is based on a pre-set *managed and moderated division,* for the benefit of a very few at the top of the pyramids accompanied by the often-repeated nice-sounding storyline. Create the script of the own heroes. Their entire scripted money-funded history sounds like a Hollywood superhero movie that sounds too good to be true. Guess what? It is. It is what they are NOT telling you, that they try to hide.
Who wields the POWER? Who has had the GEOGRAPHICAL ADVANTAGE of being able to reach all the other little buck catchers (tools, and other Roman-era style instruments of POWER), but could not be reached itself, because of a geographical-, technological-, organizational-, military-, strategic-, political advantage at any given point of a historical timeline? Create the default rival/enemy on their own marching routes. It is usually the power most likely to succeed which is determined as the default rival/enemy. Notice how, as soon as a rival starts mass-producing products high up in the value chain of capitalism, and starts vying for markets, and becomes successful, it immediately becomes the systemic rival, and is then geopolitically encircled by the greater empire. It happened around 1900, as Germany started building high-value products, and it happened around 2000, as China started moving away from building cheap toys and labor intensive kitchen appliances...
The games start on the home turf. The first victims are their own people in the USA/collective West, locked in the eternal struggle for wealth and personal gain which they have been deceived into thinking is "good greed", but which WILL be exploited by the snakes who deceive them on the domestic tier of the divide-and-rule system of power. Because ..."most of the great problems we face are caused by politicians creating solutions to problems they created in the first place." - Walter E. Williams
*War is a great **_divider._** It goes straight through the heads of millions and billions of people from the very top tiers, right down to the individual level. War divides alignments and alliances, goes straight through organizations, divides political parties, tears through families, and finally at the very bottom tier, goes straight through individual hearts and minds as individuals struggle with themselves.*
The respect of muslim men to their muslim women is of the highest standards by not touching them in any way if they are not part of their family. Not touching any non-Muslim women is also saying that muslim men also respect them as high as muslim women.
Even today in most western countries, etiquette is women will offer the hand first with a man (i.e she get to choose to go for a handshake or not). In their men=women world, that's a bit discriminatory if the man doesn't get to choose as well.
thank you sir!!! thanks to talk about this important topic