Beautiful! But I still prefer the ceramic version. The shiny bezel and the red accents makes it look more premium. This one looks more rugged and utilitarian.
Thanks for the hands on review! The lumed bezel is 🔥 A lot of hate on this watch from the YT watch community but the more I see it, the more I get the idea of staying true to the SMP dna, including the HEV, imo. Only sad part is the pricing… but it does make me contemplate selling my white SMp for this. 💸💸
@@hand.wound.horology agree 100%. 40mm and closer to 12mm thickness and this would’ve been a home run with a classically proportioned case to really bring it iconic status
I get your point, but in this case, what they need is a shorter clasp along with the shorter bracelet. There is otherwise enough articulation in the bracelet, but with the current clasp, it sits funny on smaller wrists.
Thanks for doing this review I don’t know, I think the black dial looks really nice but it has “Omega is copying Rolex” kind of vibe with the black dial and white indices. The mesh bracelet can not hug 5.9 small wrist which I have. I probably will stick to traditional blue wave dial with the standard SM300p bracelet
I see where your coming from. But I think the watch has enough differences to set it apart. Wave dial, external hev, mesh bracelet (for better or worse) The traditional one is a great piece
Of course the price increase is not justified. It's just Omega being Omega. It'll still sell a ton at the price point they've set. In reality, this new version of the Seamaster is much cheaper to make than the standard version. The bracelet is 10x cheaper, no complicated clasp, no integrated endlines, no variation in finishing/brushed vs polished. Then aluminum bezel and dial vs ceramic and no date.... and then just monochrome colors, no red print or red tip second hand making it all even cheaper.
You're forgetting that the new one has a domed sapphire crystal, which is an upgrade over the flat one found in the standard version. Whether or not that warrants the price increase is up for debate though!
I've been waiting for this video; thanks a lot. I still hoped Omega would offer the option to buy this watch with a Stanley Steel bracelet, the same as the 2018 Seamaster model.
@@hand.wound.horology My grail diver! You can pick them up around 3k in good condition (discontinued in 2009, so is a "Neo-vintage". It is definetely the best Seamaster reference: Military look, epic sword-hands, no-nonsense dial, and powered by the legendary and THIN!!! ETA2892.
I’ve had the Pagani version of this one for a few years. Complete with Milanese bracelet - no escape valve though (not that I’m going to become a saturation diver overnight…)
Thanks for the look at this new watch. I think it’s a bit of an overstatement to frame reactions to bracelet as “a lot of dislike”. I have the NTTD and the 60th, and the mesh bracelet looks awesome and fits very comfortably, I’ve not knocked it on anything at all. I think most of the small minority who don’t like the band haven’t been able to wear one yet.
Been waiting for some real hands on shots! Looks really good on your wrist (mine is the same size). I was first to inquire with my AD so will be the first call to check it out!
Thank you. Firstly to point out dive watches are not my favourite. But I can appreciate the use of one in certain lifestyle situations. I liked the burgundy 41. But i found it too thick. Panerai submersible is nice and this one. I think i like the omega of the 3. Do you have any suggestions?
For me the absence of a date window is actually a feature, not something missing. never liked how Omega integrated it - and I couldn't care less about it in a diver.
I respectfully disagree with your opinion. But I somewhat understand where you're coming from. I myself prefer the no date version and thi is my favourite smp in their current catalogue. But what do you think of the price increase given the no date?
@@hand.wound.horology for me the question is what you’re comparing it to… the James Bond version that’s listed for 10k? A submariner? I think the price is fair for what it offers and in my opinion it’s the first smp that can actually stand against a submariner.
The black no-date model will be flying off the shelves. My AD already has 18 orders and only 7 of them allocated for the next 6 months. I am one of them :(. It's mental... The silver Ti bezel model will be an acquired taste, don't believe many will stretch towards it, sadly. Omega just went a little too far with its silvery monochorme design and Rolex Yachmaster-like bezel.
I like the black one. Personally I hate red second hand and Seamster text. That's why I took green one. I would keep the shiny bezel instead of this aluminum
These watches are transitional models for the end of the current SMP300s life cycle. They have nothing to do with the next gen SMP300. Omega needed a way to bridge the generations from current to next gen. When an SMP300 reaches year 5 or 6 of it's lifecycle sales drop off because people who are considering one are playing it cautious and waiting to see the new model before they commit. These watches are made completely from Omega's existing parts bin. The wave dial on the black model is the original 90s Brosnan generation 1 wave dial. It is the same dial on the Bond 60th but in matte black instead of blue. To be honest I am surprised a watch youtuber didn't know this already. The steel on steel version uses the exact same bezel as the Nekton SMP300 and the brushed steel dial looks to be using old recently deleted Railmaster dial blanks. Many are complaining about the case size and the bracelets. Omega is not about to debut the next generation tapered bracelet on a transitional model made from stock parts. They needed to supply a bracelet that was not the current model SMP bracelet and this is why the mesh and the rubber are the two current options. All the new stuff will debut with the release of the next gen SMP300 which will be around another year of waiting. People are complaining about the mesh bracelet being uncomfortable. If this is the case the problem a you problem and not an Omega problem. The mesh bracelet comes in three lengths; S for wrists below 6.5', M the default that you will get if you don't ask otherwise and L which is for wrists 7.5" and over. When you order the correct bracelet there is no hang over from the clasp that rubs uncomfortably. If it's uncomfortable it's because you have ordered the wrong bracelet with your purchase. I have the L version and it comforms to the curve of my wrist beautifully on my 8' wrist. People really need to stop bandwagoning hate on this release, or at least read the Omega website to find out why they used an aluminium bezel insert, gen 1 wave dial and the mesh. It's all there explained in detail. Understanding of what these watches are, and importantly, are not is paramount in one's understanding of what this release is intended to achieve.
Everyone is making such of a fuss over this release. Very underwhelming for me. Looks pretty much the same as the prior. The SMP is stuck in the late 90's/early 2000's and is in desperate need for a revamp.
Seems like most watch brands are digging into the archives and reissuing instead of coming up with new ideas. Must be easy being a watch designer these days 😆
@@hand.wound.horology Ha ha ha ha ha, yes! Agreed Omega isn't even digging into their archives with this release - they just haven't changed the design since 1999
They still aren't listening to us. That bracelet is better than the chunky bracelet on the other ones. But... id like to see it 40ml..with no valve and a new tapered bracelet similar to the bracelet on the speedy
@ChristopherJones2 well yes. Because there are many speedy options. And the speedy wears smaller than 42. Id like to completely replace the dive watch with what I recommended. At least update the bracelet and valve
Exactly. I would have asked her to clarify which materials were an improvement on the new one. Which, of course, she would have not been able to answer.
Yeah, this confused me too. Ceramic is more expensive than aluminium and the 8806 is less complex than the 8800. Also, the Milanese bracelet is cheaper to manufacture than the regular Seamaster bracelet. The new one should be $1000 less on manufacturing costs in the real world.
The question is why made Omega this terrible bracelet again. The have to read so many negative reviews about this bracelet. What is wrong with a slim tapered modified original seamaster bracelet?
@@hand.wound.horology no, it’s the aesthetic… the extra stems make it look too busy. I love the no date and the mesh bracelet, just wish it had sword hands.
The dial feels too busy. Toothpaste valve is still a huge miss and so is the size... and the bracelet... and that clasp... Ultimately... this is horrible. Especially, for the money....
Get rid of display caseback and shave off some thickness, 55 hr PR for high tech co-axial is embarrassing, still can’t make a decent bracelet. I’d buy on rubber if was thinner and cheaper than regular model with more! Giving less charging more is shady
I am not very familiar with the seamaster line to have asked that follow-up question. But you make a good point. Omega doing omega things again it seems
@ the new one has an aluminum bezel and dial vs standard ceramic bezel and dial. I would think ceramic costs more than aluminum plus they take away a date function. Less for more! lol
I get understand where your coming from. But I think it's a good option for those whole like subtle monochrome watches Just not liking the price increase
Probably the worst looking diver watch ever, those Shrek ears looks terrible while that bezel has no function what so ever,skeleton hands looks bland while every braclet on seamster looks like it came from Ali express, no taper and no style at all for 6k watch
This model is an objective downgrade in materials from the standard 300M and its priced at $600 more, which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Omega really has turned into a BS brand.
Beautiful! But I still prefer the ceramic version. The shiny bezel and the red accents makes it look more premium. This one looks more rugged and utilitarian.
Rugged and utilitarian is exactly what they were aiming for. This is designed to fire a shot across the bow of the Submariner no date.
Both versions have their own charms!
This is the first review I waited for. The real stuff without commercial stuff from Omega.
Good review en wrist shots!
Thanks !
Thanks for watching. Appreciate your support 🙏
Honestly, this thing looks like a homerun to me. The black one that is. Hope I can pick one up
There's no need to hope, you can pick one up gray at below retail
It is my favourite smp
Thanks for the hands on review!
The lumed bezel is 🔥
A lot of hate on this watch from the YT watch community but the more I see it, the more I get the idea of staying true to the SMP dna, including the HEV, imo.
Only sad part is the pricing… but it does make me contemplate selling my white SMp for this. 💸💸
It's a great piece. But the general consensus I'm getting is the price hike is not justified
For me, the original black SMP 300 with date window like shown in a white dial in your video is better. Ceramic dial is irreplaceable. 😊
The ceramic gets old after a while. I had it and after the honey moon period it’s just meh. I think the aluminum is the way to go.
The classic design is timeless, but the new model also has its own charm.
Looks great on your wrist! Black one really suits you.
I really like it too.
Maybe smaller case size?
But if it was thinner I would definitely consider one
@@hand.wound.horology agree 100%. 40mm and closer to 12mm thickness and this would’ve been a home run with a classically proportioned case to really bring it iconic status
One day 🥲
Don't forget there is a shorter length Milanese for us small wristed fellows.
I get your point, but in this case, what they need is a shorter clasp along with the shorter bracelet. There is otherwise enough articulation in the bracelet, but with the current clasp, it sits funny on smaller wrists.
@ I don’t have that problem at all. These are all internet issues. I reality it’s like any other bracket - size it to your wrist.
@ wasn’t an internet problem for me.
Thanks for doing this review
I don’t know, I think the black dial looks really nice but it has “Omega is copying Rolex” kind of vibe with the black dial and white indices. The mesh bracelet can not hug 5.9 small wrist which I have. I probably will stick to traditional blue wave dial with the standard SM300p bracelet
I see where your coming from. But I think the watch has enough differences to set it apart.
Wave dial, external hev, mesh bracelet (for better or worse)
The traditional one is a great piece
I think for that money, they prefer a No time to die in the grey market for the same price. The titanium color is under the radar and more special.
Good point
Of course the price increase is not justified. It's just Omega being Omega. It'll still sell a ton at the price point they've set. In reality, this new version of the Seamaster is much cheaper to make than the standard version. The bracelet is 10x cheaper, no complicated clasp, no integrated endlines, no variation in finishing/brushed vs polished. Then aluminum bezel and dial vs ceramic and no date.... and then just monochrome colors, no red print or red tip second hand making it all even cheaper.
Man the way you explained it.
Omega is taking us on a ride with this one
You said it!
You're forgetting that the new one has a domed sapphire crystal, which is an upgrade over the flat one found in the standard version. Whether or not that warrants the price increase is up for debate though!
Also it should definitely cost less than a seamaster with a date. The price increase isn't justified in my opinion but damn it looks so good.
100%. Good looking piece. But the price increase is a joke
I've been waiting for this video; thanks a lot. I still hoped Omega would offer the option to buy this watch with a Stanley Steel bracelet, the same as the 2018 Seamaster model.
That would be great.
Thanks for watching 🙏
The watch fits well on your wrist, always like Omega case design
Omega is the master of hiding Thickness with their case designs.
It's a winner for me
GREAT WATCH! OMEGA Should definitely cut it down to 40mm by 12mm thick. I still think NO TIME TO DIE is pure perfection
If they did that. It would be game over for the competition.
Honestly, it looks great. If only they had released this in 40mm....oh, the dream!
40mm case and 12mm thickness.
That would be the best diver
@ they do have (IMO) the perfect diver. 2254.50 Peter Blake! 41mm, 11.8mm thick! Oh, what a marvelous thing!
@Harvin87 just looked it up. That is a handsome piece!
@@hand.wound.horology My grail diver! You can pick them up around 3k in good condition (discontinued in 2009, so is a "Neo-vintage". It is definetely the best Seamaster reference: Military look, epic sword-hands, no-nonsense dial, and powered by the legendary and THIN!!! ETA2892.
Nice video nice watch👍
Appreciate the support 🙏
I’ve had the Pagani version of this one for a few years. Complete with Milanese bracelet - no escape valve though (not that I’m going to become a saturation diver overnight…)
What is your long term experience with the mesh in terms of comfort and practicality?
Thanks for the look at this new watch. I think it’s a bit of an overstatement to frame reactions to bracelet as “a lot of dislike”. I have the NTTD and the 60th, and the mesh bracelet looks awesome and fits very comfortably, I’ve not knocked it on anything at all. I think most of the small minority who don’t like the band haven’t been able to wear one yet.
I wouldn’t say it’s a small minority. Loads of people do not like the bracelet, both functionally and aesthetically.
Good points.
It was my initial feelings of when I worn it. I'm sure if I owned one long term I would fully appreciate it. Thanks for watching
@ For sure. Thanks again for the video, and the reply.
Been waiting for some real hands on shots! Looks really good on your wrist (mine is the same size). I was first to inquire with my AD so will be the first call to check it out!
Hope it arrives soon mate. You won't be disappointed
it's a beauty, just needs a date and it's a homerun.
Thanks for watching 🙏
I wish they would've made it with a matte ceramic bezel.
And dial
Yeah that would give the watch some visual appeal
Im wearing a watch with a cracked ceramic bezel right now, not nearly as cool as a scratched and patina'd aluminum bezel.
I like the aluminium bezel on this piece. Gives it a different look.
Sorry to hear about the watch
Will the bracelet from my Omega Seamaster Divers 300M fit on this watch?
I think the steel mesh bracelets kind of cheapen the watch.
I recall the sales girl saying it would. But best to double check
I feel like the silver one would’ve been better with a sunburst dial. Also I hope they release this in the blue but without the bond details
A blue one will be amazing. Thanks for watching
Love this design, but the AR coating looks lacking, like my heritage 300
Great video! What are your options for your 1st diver so far?
Thank you.
Firstly to point out dive watches are not my favourite. But I can appreciate the use of one in certain lifestyle situations.
I liked the burgundy 41. But i found it too thick. Panerai submersible is nice and this one.
I think i like the omega of the 3. Do you have any suggestions?
Price increase while removing feature and using aluminum bezel is a deal breaker for me. Alas, i'll stick to my speedmaster for now.
I love the look of this one. But the price increase is inexcusable
Please tell me, was it difficult to wipe the watch glass from fingerprints before you started shooting the video?
Not difficult at all. Thanks for the feedback.
I will advise the omega staff to keep their watches clean 😆
Are they available at ADs already or only Omega Boutiques?
Dunno about the ads.
They told me the boutique received 4 pieces 2 days ago. 3 have been allocated and 1 is for display.
Thanks for a great review 👍🏻
Appreciate the support
Would be nice to see these new watches in their rubber strap variants
They advised me they haven't arrived yet.
Once they arrive they will contact me. Maybe I'll do another video with the rubber straps
For me the absence of a date window is actually a feature, not something missing. never liked how Omega integrated it - and I couldn't care less about it in a diver.
I respectfully disagree with your opinion. But I somewhat understand where you're coming from.
I myself prefer the no date version and thi is my favourite smp in their current catalogue. But what do you think of the price increase given the no date?
@@hand.wound.horology for me the question is what you’re comparing it to… the James Bond version that’s listed for 10k? A submariner? I think the price is fair for what it offers and in my opinion it’s the first smp that can actually stand against a submariner.
@@hand.wound.horologyI think it’s too much considering it has a Milanese bracelet
@flo12325 good point. Within the whole watch market it is good value.
I agree 👍
great footage- i have the ceramic black, i would be tempted to trade.
It definitely is a different look. Can both models exist in the same watch collection?
@hand.wound.horology hard to justify. 😂 It's tempting
Very tempting
The aluminum is obviously more expensive than laser etched ceramic with a more complicated movement.
I didn't know that. Thanks for sharing
The black no-date model will be flying off the shelves. My AD already has 18 orders and only 7 of them allocated for the next 6 months. I am one of them :(. It's mental...
The silver Ti bezel model will be an acquired taste, don't believe many will stretch towards it, sadly. Omega just went a little too far with its silvery monochorme design and Rolex Yachmaster-like bezel.
The sales girl told me she likes the silver one due to the shiny bezel.
Might be targeted towards the women from the sounds of it
The rotor in your video doesn't have any Geneva Stripes or perlage, I just bought the gray and it has Geneva stripes on the movement.
That is strange. I didn't notice that. Perhaps this is a change Omega made on their latest models.
It has Geneva stripes. It's not that easily visible in the video because that shot is overexposed and not focused correctly but it's there.
@pavelkovar excuse my poor camera quality
@@hand.wound.horology It's OK :) No need to apologize. Thank you for the video about these beautiful timepieces! Enjoy your new acquisition!
@pavelkovar thanks for your support.
Though I didn't acquire it. I just went to look at it lol
I like no date watches, but not a fan of the mesh strap. I’ll stick with my SMP 300.
Good decision.
I don't know if the bracelets are interchangeable
I like the black one. Personally I hate red second hand and Seamster text. That's why I took green one. I would keep the shiny bezel instead of this aluminum
The best of both worlds. One day omega
Will the regular bracelet fit?
I don't know. I do recall her saying the case is the same. I'll have too ask next time I visit.
Thanks for watching
Yes, saw it already
Omega missed an opportunity to resize this and branch into a new audience. This is well overdue. Other brands respond in kind to their audience 😅
A lot of watch brands have downsized their watches.
Seems like omega and patek have missed the memo 😆
Still prefer the Seamaster in green.
The green is gorgeous and eye catching. But I think this one has merit too.
For those who prefer something more subtle and low key
They need to design a new bracelet and reduce the helium escape valve to the same size as the 90's Seamaster.
Not a fan of matte black dials. The aliminum bezel looks good.
Always leave us wanting more
You're the 1st video upload of this watch well done
Thank you 😊
These watches are transitional models for the end of the current SMP300s life cycle. They have nothing to do with the next gen SMP300. Omega needed a way to bridge the generations from current to next gen. When an SMP300 reaches year 5 or 6 of it's lifecycle sales drop off because people who are considering one are playing it cautious and waiting to see the new model before they commit. These watches are made completely from Omega's existing parts bin. The wave dial on the black model is the original 90s Brosnan generation 1 wave dial. It is the same dial on the Bond 60th but in matte black instead of blue. To be honest I am surprised a watch youtuber didn't know this already. The steel on steel version uses the exact same bezel as the Nekton SMP300 and the brushed steel dial looks to be using old recently deleted Railmaster dial blanks.
Many are complaining about the case size and the bracelets. Omega is not about to debut the next generation tapered bracelet on a transitional model made from stock parts. They needed to supply a bracelet that was not the current model SMP bracelet and this is why the mesh and the rubber are the two current options. All the new stuff will debut with the release of the next gen SMP300 which will be around another year of waiting.
People are complaining about the mesh bracelet being uncomfortable. If this is the case the problem a you problem and not an Omega problem. The mesh bracelet comes in three lengths; S for wrists below 6.5', M the default that you will get if you don't ask otherwise and L which is for wrists 7.5" and over. When you order the correct bracelet there is no hang over from the clasp that rubs uncomfortably. If it's uncomfortable it's because you have ordered the wrong bracelet with your purchase. I have the L version and it comforms to the curve of my wrist beautifully on my 8' wrist.
People really need to stop bandwagoning hate on this release, or at least read the Omega website to find out why they used an aluminium bezel insert, gen 1 wave dial and the mesh. It's all there explained in detail. Understanding of what these watches are, and importantly, are not is paramount in one's understanding of what this release is intended to achieve.
Everyone is making such of a fuss over this release. Very underwhelming for me. Looks pretty much the same as the prior. The SMP is stuck in the late 90's/early 2000's and is in desperate need for a revamp.
Seems like most watch brands are digging into the archives and reissuing instead of coming up with new ideas.
Must be easy being a watch designer these days 😆
@@hand.wound.horology Ha ha ha ha ha, yes! Agreed
Omega isn't even digging into their archives with this release - they just haven't changed the design since 1999
They still aren't listening to us. That bracelet is better than the chunky bracelet on the other ones. But... id like to see it 40ml..with no valve and a new tapered bracelet similar to the bracelet on the speedy
One day...
Get yourself a Black bay, you're looking at the wrong watch 🙄
@andrewwheeler8591 dint want a black bay. Want something that's better than a black bay. And I already have a pelagos
If the 40 would sell they would make it. They sell the speedy reduced and it doesn't sell that well
@ChristopherJones2 well yes. Because there are many speedy options. And the speedy wears smaller than 42. Id like to completely replace the dive watch with what I recommended. At least update the bracelet and valve
for my honestly opinion, the new one, the wave pattern just lie Male pubic hair..but come with a good bracelet.
Haha. Since you said that. I can't unsee it 🥲
@@hand.wound.horology bro you are the honest guy. at least u accept the people comments
@samleong6916 every one is entitled to their opinions.
Yours is very insightful 😆
@@hand.wound.horology 😂 my pardon
2:28 - turn off the lights, close the door & get down - she will say yes - tee heee
睡醒了没有？
Good one 😂
I’ve got tried on this watch
What were your thoughts on it?
price should’ve never changed, if it did it shouldn’t be 1000 imo
100%. Had to justify this one
That salesperson was bullshitting you on the price increase.
Exactly. I would have asked her to clarify which materials were an improvement on the new one. Which, of course, she would have not been able to answer.
Yeah, this confused me too. Ceramic is more expensive than aluminium and the 8806 is less complex than the 8800. Also, the Milanese bracelet is cheaper to manufacture than the regular Seamaster bracelet. The new one should be $1000 less on manufacturing costs in the real world.
Haha yeah. She must be doing her job well then. That's what their paid for 😂
Bow-teek!
Excuse my poor English.
Thanks for watching 🙏
No date?
No date.
I didn't know I wanted a no date seamaster until now
The question is why made Omega this terrible bracelet again. The have to read so many negative reviews about this bracelet. What is wrong with a slim tapered modified original seamaster bracelet?
Omega is slacking. They just need to make a few adjustments to their watches to go from good to great watches.
What's stopping them?
Milanese is a no Go for this tool! My patience with Omega does Not last much longer. I return to rolex
They need to listen to their fans 🥲
No date, no ceramic bezel, I’d rather have the America’s Cup edition
Thanks for the tip. Not familiar with that model, I'll look into it
@
ruclips.net/video/6e7RtPZlL74/видео.htmlsi=eRN721cMan-rdw9o
Would buy in a heartbeat if it weren’t for the skeleton hands.
Is it because the hands are not legible?
@@hand.wound.horology no, it’s the aesthetic… the extra stems make it look too busy. I love the no date and the mesh bracelet, just wish it had sword hands.
The silver one looks like a replica rip off of the Yachtmaster.
Yeah it looks kind of cheap in person. Wasn't a fan at all
Should be 40 mm
That would be the dream. It will give the sub a run for its money
Not a fan of the bloated domed sapphire crystal.
It does add unnecessary Thickness to the watch
The dial feels too busy. Toothpaste valve is still a huge miss and so is the size... and the bracelet... and that clasp...
Ultimately... this is horrible. Especially, for the money....
I hope omega and address of all those one day. It would be a killer watch
Get rid of display caseback and shave off some thickness, 55 hr PR for high tech co-axial is embarrassing, still can’t make a decent bracelet. I’d buy on rubber if was thinner and cheaper than regular model with more! Giving less charging more is shady
Good points. They should be upgrading not taking things away
from these series, the 007 6oth and NTTD are the best, rest are just same boring models
Agree 👍
I hate that bloody bracelet.
It is am acquired taste.
But it does give the watch a different look compared to other brands
Different materials? If that’s the reason then it should be lowered!! It’s using lesser materials!!! 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
I am not very familiar with the seamaster line to have asked that follow-up question.
But you make a good point. Omega doing omega things again it seems
@ the new one has an aluminum bezel and dial vs standard ceramic bezel and dial. I would think ceramic costs more than aluminum plus they take away a date function. Less for more! lol
@dukes70 omega got some explaining to do lol
Bezel and dial will fade. No thanks.
Best SMP 300 ever.
That’s not saying much.
@ I agree hahaha
😆
Mesh bracelet, Aluminum bezel? Downgrade.
Haha spot on
a bit.. boring no? it's only my opinion of course
I get understand where your coming from. But I think it's a good option for those whole like subtle monochrome watches
Just not liking the price increase
Bracelet looks cheap.
It is not too bad. But I think overall, omega bracelets (except the speedmaster) could be improved
Probably the worst looking diver watch ever, those Shrek ears looks terrible while that bezel has no function what so ever,skeleton hands looks bland while every braclet on seamster looks like it came from Ali express, no taper and no style at all for 6k watch
No tapered bracelet is a huge sin from omega
for me one of the ugliest watches out there.
rly dont like it.
We are all entitled to our opinions.
Curious, what do you prefer instead? Dive watch wise
Both inferior to the Sub
They just need to do some small refinements to compete with the sub.
Hopefully one day
It‘s a downgrade
The price should also be downgraded to match
Boring and overpriced 😢
Boring maybe. But yes it is a bit overpriced
Sucks. Don’t buy it. Buy cartier
Thanks for the advice 🙏
This model is an objective downgrade in materials from the standard 300M and its priced at $600 more, which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Omega really has turned into a BS brand.
really the only material change is an aluminum bezel. So Rolex was a BS brand for 50+ years? and they offer both.
Yeah that is a hard pill to swallow
Omega "bow-teak" ..Ok.
Excuse my poor English.
Thanks for watching 🙏