9:50 Uluru is larger than an island? I can’t believe that I’m saying this but an island is not a definite unit of measure. uluru is a very large rock on the map directly Above Australia, there is a plethora of very large islands. lol
One fascinating fact that probably isn't in here is that the difference between history and prehistory is the written word. Being that Australian Indigenous culture was about oral history and not written, Australian history only starts when the British settled in Australia, before then, Australia was prehistoric.
There's very little information about the Aboriginal people because the distant relatives don't want anyone talking to the real Aboriginal people because they're living standards will be exposed which is caused by the distant relatives stealing all the welfare money
this channel is clearly not bothered by actual facts. don't watch other videos because some information and pictures etc... are not factual and are used loosely by the creator
In 1522 one of 3 Portuguese caravels ran aground near Port Fairy in Victoria (The Mahogany Ship) some of the survivors intermarried with the aboriginal people resulting in fair skinned natives.
That is the worst theory I've ever heard for light skinned Aboriginal people. Often the men extremely violent so the women chose white husband's instead but there certainly weren't any white Aborigines here when the English turned up. Now if this event happened in the 1500s they would have been bred out long ago .
@@James-kv6kbthe Dutch landed in tasmania and wrecked heaps of ships here way before Jimmy Cook turned up 😂. And up the west coast of Australia and sure there were other places too. Some were shipwrecked and the survivors were taken in. Look up the shipwrecks for your self mate. Don't believe me. The north west tip of tassie is a good start. West side of King Island.
@James-kv6kb check out the story of the ship wreck the Batavia, in the Abrhollos Islands ,WA. There is Dutch DNA within the light skinned and blonde haired indigenous population.
Until you see Uluru with your own eyes, no picture can do it justice. It is as tall as a 100 story building. When i first got there we couldn't see the top of the rock because it was covered by clouds.
A couple of points , Aboriginal people have been trading with the Macassians for long before the Dutch arrived, and the first Australian inhabitants were Denisovan, and others came later (10 /15000yrs ago)and interbred
the fact that the Denisovan were there before doesn't change the the facts that the ABORIGINES WERE THE FIRST HUMANS to reach Australia so it doesn't make them the first there because they are not talking about other human species but modern times humans that live there. like saying i am going to the store and you saying its not a store it was a gas station before it doesn't change anything about going to the store now
I find it hilarious hearing people talking about the Aborigines from overseas that completely get it wrong and only get their information from people with very little Aboriginal blood which you can tell by this video because the real full-blooded Aboriginal people are not allowed in the media. Now in terms of when they got here you have to relate that to the bow and arrow if they've travelled from Africa to Australia it has to be before then. Also the ocean theory is out because they didn't have pottery therefore couldn't carry water and if they had seafaring ships why did they stop using them ? . As for South Americans having Aboriginal DNA well it's obviously Aborigines went north into Asia and then down into South America . You have to understand these people were still using prehistoric stone tools when white man got here 200 years ago they did not build houses they certainly did not farm or have any agriculture because everything they needed was around them , despite Papua New Guinea being completely different . It just simply doesn't make sense if the least evolved is in Australia and that changes as you go North . Of course no research is allowed to be done in Australia to prove this point so the scientists just go back to this tired old out of Africa theory
No one had boats back then, any watercraft would have been a raft, at best. They wouldn't necessarily have needed water if it might only have been 20 km and they were used to fishing and island hopping.
They had to travel at least partly by land. There are islands in the Indonesian archipelago that were never connected by land because the channel between them was too deep. That is what the Wallace line is. Also, you don't need pottery to transport water, in fact 70000 years ago, no culture was making pottery. They would have used pouches made from animal skins or animal gut sacks to transport water. As far as food, they were hunters and didn't need to transport their own food. I do agree that they were still in prehistory before the British settled as they didn't write down their history, it was completely oral.
@@James-kv6kb research this. Eel farms and stone huts in Victoria, southern Australia. Stone henge structure near Mullumbimby northern NSW. And the Gympie Pyramid in Queensland. History is something none of us can be completely certain about..
@@garymaidman625 hunters are not fishermen and you cannot transport enough water to sail across the oceans in animal skins. As I always say if you people have met real Aborigines you'd realise they were the first humans and they've been here all along
9:50
Uluru is larger than an island? I can’t believe that I’m saying this but an island is not a definite unit of measure.
uluru is a very large rock
on the map directly Above Australia, there is a plethora of very large islands. lol
The Pitjantjajatjara didn't even call it Uluru lol so much bulshit made up of by The distant relatives
One fascinating fact that probably isn't in here is that the difference between history and prehistory is the written word. Being that Australian Indigenous culture was about oral history and not written, Australian history only starts when the British settled in Australia, before then, Australia was prehistoric.
More content like this please. So fascinating 🙏
There's very little information about the Aboriginal people because the distant relatives don't want anyone talking to the real Aboriginal people because they're living standards will be exposed which is caused by the distant relatives stealing all the welfare money
@@James-kv6kb I have no time for the racism you're spouting. Knock it off.
Just an observation, some of the images of people used are maori not a aborigines.
Not allowed to use aborigines anyway, because it's illegal to have them on media due to cultural reasons.
this channel is clearly not bothered by actual facts. don't watch other videos because some information and pictures etc... are not factual and are used loosely by the creator
In 1522 one of 3 Portuguese caravels ran aground near Port Fairy in Victoria (The Mahogany Ship) some of the survivors intermarried with the aboriginal people resulting in fair skinned natives.
That is the worst theory I've ever heard for light skinned Aboriginal people. Often the men extremely violent so the women chose white husband's instead but there certainly weren't any white Aborigines here when the English turned up. Now if this event happened in the 1500s they would have been bred out long ago .
I'm pretty sure that story is a myth, the mahogany ship is an urban legend.
@@James-kv6kb Gee, you are really going to town with negative racial stereotypes there. Pretty disappointing.
@@James-kv6kbthe Dutch landed in tasmania and wrecked heaps of ships here way before Jimmy Cook turned up 😂. And up the west coast of Australia and sure there were other places too. Some were shipwrecked and the survivors were taken in. Look up the shipwrecks for your self mate. Don't believe me. The north west tip of tassie is a good start. West side of King Island.
@James-kv6kb check out the story of the ship wreck the Batavia, in the Abrhollos Islands ,WA. There is Dutch DNA within the light skinned and blonde haired indigenous population.
Until you see Uluru with your own eyes, no picture can do it justice. It is as tall as a 100 story building. When i first got there we couldn't see the top of the rock because it was covered by clouds.
A couple of points , Aboriginal people have been trading with the Macassians for long before the Dutch arrived, and the first Australian inhabitants were Denisovan, and others came later (10 /15000yrs ago)and interbred
the fact that the Denisovan were there before doesn't change the the facts that the ABORIGINES WERE THE FIRST HUMANS to reach Australia so it doesn't make them the first there because they are not talking about other human species but modern times humans that live there.
like saying i am going to the store and you saying its not a store it was a gas station before
it doesn't change anything about going to the store now
Amazing video! I've got so many insights!
Not very accurate though you can see the light skinned Aborigines provided the information
Can you do New Zealand next
Anyway, apparently, Australia doesnt exist.
Oh Crap! Does that mean I'm living in the Matrix?
I find it hilarious hearing people talking about the Aborigines from overseas that completely get it wrong and only get their information from people with very little Aboriginal blood which you can tell by this video because the real full-blooded Aboriginal people are not allowed in the media. Now in terms of when they got here you have to relate that to the bow and arrow if they've travelled from Africa to Australia it has to be before then. Also the ocean theory is out because they didn't have pottery therefore couldn't carry water and if they had seafaring ships why did they stop using them ? . As for South Americans having Aboriginal DNA well it's obviously Aborigines went north into Asia and then down into South America . You have to understand these people were still using prehistoric stone tools when white man got here 200 years ago they did not build houses they certainly did not farm or have any agriculture because everything they needed was around them , despite Papua New Guinea being completely different . It just simply doesn't make sense if the least evolved is in Australia and that changes as you go North . Of course no research is allowed to be done in Australia to prove this point so the scientists just go back to this tired old out of Africa theory
No one had boats back then, any watercraft would have been a raft, at best. They wouldn't necessarily have needed water if it might only have been 20 km and they were used to fishing and island hopping.
They had to travel at least partly by land. There are islands in the Indonesian archipelago that were never connected by land because the channel between them was too deep. That is what the Wallace line is. Also, you don't need pottery to transport water, in fact 70000 years ago, no culture was making pottery. They would have used pouches made from animal skins or animal gut sacks to transport water. As far as food, they were hunters and didn't need to transport their own food. I do agree that they were still in prehistory before the British settled as they didn't write down their history, it was completely oral.
@@James-kv6kb research this. Eel farms and stone huts in Victoria, southern Australia. Stone henge structure near Mullumbimby northern NSW. And the Gympie Pyramid in Queensland. History is something none of us can be completely certain about..
@@youscooba you obviously don't understand their was absolutely nothing here before white man turned up and certainly no proof
@@garymaidman625 hunters are not fishermen and you cannot transport enough water to sail across the oceans in animal skins. As I always say if you people have met real Aborigines you'd realise they were the first humans and they've been here all along
So is the misinformation
Hello there
It's not of the oldest culture it is the oldest on the planet