Wow! This is awesome I wish I would be able to experience this kind of driving in a Mazda 3 in this condition it's very challenging. It would be more fun if it's the 2.5 AWD.🏎🏎🏎
bei mir wird der treibstoff als E- 10 also Ottokraftstoff angegeben... Kann mir jemand auf einfache Weise erklären, wie dieser sich im Bezug auf Benzin verhält ob man höhere Kosten hat, welche Reichweite man hat und ob es sich um einen gasförmigen Treibstoff handelt....
Not so long ago, I was a fierce advocate of naturally aspirated engines. However, I have to say this performance from a n/a 2.0 is really disappointing.
Well if the term performance is about the ponys and torque maybe yes. But the engine also features for economy and comfort driving, the gear ratios are too wide to accelerate quickly,
Bohužel tak bohatou zkušenost s ní nemám. Jsem ostuda, já vim. Ale na rozbitou okresku jsem se s autem bohužel nedostal. Co jsem zkoušel, tak je krásně dotáčivý s pocitově lehkým předkem.
how can you compare any of the present cars with Mazda? the boxster has terrible driver and none of them is pushing... Im not saying it is a bad car, but this comparison gives us as much info as promo materials.
MK Automotive I’ve read your article on the internet, how did you catch the porsche etc. The video does not show anything. That is true :) The article was very bad...
@@humlhuml8947 The steering ratio is pretty bad. Many other reviews on RUclips have said so. Especially in city driving and turning corners. At stop lights and around town. Parking etc. Okay on highway, yet he's turning the steering wheel quite a bit more than even its rival subcompact class competition. The new global platform Subaru Crosstrek has the same steering wheel ratio as the BRZ sports car rear wheel drive. For a 186HP and same torque, its lost its Zoom Zoom factor. Engine is loud at higher RPM's. Plus, they went cheap with the old torsion beam suspension and only heating half of the steering wheel. Terrible blind spots in the Hatchback. Thank goodness for blind spot detection. Your going to need it. The style also looks like the side doors have been dented in. Sure, they spend money on the interior fit and finish and make it more upscale and luxurious than the competition. Yet, they go cheap on the above mentioned. Not a deal breaker maybe. Nice interior, but overall package isn't that impressive.
@@bradcreber75 What is the problem with the blind spots in the Hatchback? If u have camera and blind spot detections... its all fine, or not? I have never needed greater visibility, and it is a very easy to use car to park with all the aids (which are included). 🤷♂️
The weight went up some 150kg and the lack of torque and power from the NA engine shows. This is why there is an electric motor now, to help with the low torque, and why the old 100HP engine is no longer offered - because this one has the same performance LMAO. A tech car, and a slow car indeed.
@@youssefbayoumy5335 The G122 is a 2.0 liter engine. Double check facts before replying. 10.4s is slow for todays standards, especially for a 2.0 L engine, and more so when compared with the old G120 from Gen3 which had 8.9s 0-100 km.
2 years now, and its like the first day. My car sleeps on the street and I live next to a river. When are you going to correct the stupidity you said? Let me guess, never, because what you care about is saying stupid things to discredit what others have.
It's not only about performance now is it. Mazda have thought about how they could make the engine perform alright while still being efficient..And they seem to have done a good job
@@nobody1194 Really? Use a timer or video editor to see that difference. It accelerates at exactly 5:10:32 seconds, and reaches 100 at 5:21:36. 11.04 seconds, which for an automatic gearbox and 122 HP is pretty good. With manual gearbox it is around 10 seconds (official acceleration time), there are even people who lower it to 9.8. How is time measured in your country?
This red evo at the background, sounds lovely! ❤️
finally i could hear the sound of this engine with the AT
Wow, nice mazda my best car!!
Yet CX-5 comin' in couple of minutes :)))
Great car!!!♥️♥️♥️
Wow! This is awesome I wish I would be able to experience this kind of driving in a Mazda 3 in this condition it's very challenging. It would be more fun if it's the 2.5 AWD.🏎🏎🏎
if that porsche owner would knew you have only 122 horses :)))
bei mir wird der treibstoff als E- 10 also Ottokraftstoff angegeben... Kann mir jemand auf einfache Weise erklären, wie dieser sich im Bezug auf Benzin verhält ob man höhere Kosten hat, welche Reichweite man hat und ob es sich um einen gasförmigen Treibstoff handelt....
beautiful track
Not so long ago, I was a fierce advocate of naturally aspirated engines. However, I have to say this performance from a n/a 2.0 is really disappointing.
Well if the term performance is about the ponys and torque maybe yes. But the engine also features for economy and comfort driving, the gear ratios are too wide to accelerate quickly,
you are on the track! Revs should not fall down below 4000.
It a direct injection engine, it has good torque in low revs
@@DrBeast100 This car has only 214Nmnof torque at 4000RPM. That's what he means.
Is the AT too bad compared MT?
Heard that Mazda AT are one step below other transmissiona
No. They are great and fun
Old video, but you know you didnt have the transmission in sport mode right?
Please Tell me, Psi used in track??? Thanks.
what are the tires you have on?
Just because a car makes noise that doesn't mean it's fast. This car is painfully slow.
will the automatic gearbox push the engine well?
francis casagrande yeah just put it on sport mode
There is no sport mode
Wtf
Daniel Egal my 2017 Mazda 3 has sport mode
@@Syspender there is sports mode man.......... What are you even talking about.
@@Syspender pood daniel
Čo vravíš na túto novú trojku v porovnaní s predchádzajúcou? Je tam cítiť, že chýba vzadu multilink?
Bohužel tak bohatou zkušenost s ní nemám. Jsem ostuda, já vim. Ale na rozbitou okresku jsem se s autem bohužel nedostal. Co jsem zkoušel, tak je krásně dotáčivý s pocitově lehkým předkem.
how can you compare any of the present cars with Mazda? the boxster has terrible driver and none of them is pushing...
Im not saying it is a bad car, but this comparison gives us as much info as promo materials.
This is not comparison, man. It's just video of driving new Mazda 3 on wet technical track. Nothin less or more
MK Automotive
I’ve read your article on the internet, how did you catch the porsche etc.
The video does not show anything. That is true :)
The article was very bad...
@@humlhuml8947 The steering ratio is pretty bad. Many other reviews on RUclips have said so. Especially in city driving and turning corners. At stop lights and around town. Parking etc. Okay on highway, yet he's turning the steering wheel quite a bit more than even its rival subcompact class competition. The new global platform Subaru Crosstrek has the same steering wheel ratio as the BRZ sports car rear wheel drive. For a 186HP and same torque, its lost its Zoom Zoom factor. Engine is loud at higher RPM's. Plus, they went cheap with the old torsion beam suspension and only heating half of the steering wheel. Terrible blind spots in the Hatchback. Thank goodness for blind spot detection. Your going to need it. The style also looks like the side doors have been dented in. Sure, they spend money on the interior fit and finish and make it more upscale and luxurious than the competition. Yet, they go cheap on the above mentioned. Not a deal breaker maybe. Nice interior, but overall package isn't that impressive.
@@bradcreber75 What is the problem with the blind spots in the Hatchback? If u have camera and blind spot detections... its all fine, or not?
I have never needed greater visibility, and it is a very easy to use car to park with all the aids (which are included). 🤷♂️
Tak to je českej channel s anglickýma popiskama? :D Na infotainmentu je to v češtině :D 👑
ZeptejSeFilipa tak jasně
Sound is from the original 122 or its modified? Sounds good!
It's the original. I own the same engine but MT.
0 to 100 11 sec? thats slow
now mazda is "gadget car" nice for city trafic, not for petrol head. To much tech, engine compresion make hard to modification.
The weight went up some 150kg and the lack of torque and power from the NA engine shows. This is why there is an electric motor now, to help with the low torque, and why the old 100HP engine is no longer offered - because this one has the same performance LMAO.
A tech car, and a slow car indeed.
Mark Padua Totally agree. The new Mazda 3 is so slow in acceleration.
no its not slow firstly its 1.5 engine and also he was using manual shift mode which will not get the best out of the engine he may have got 10 or 9.5
@@youssefbayoumy5335 The G122 is a 2.0 liter engine. Double check facts before replying. 10.4s is slow for todays standards, especially for a 2.0 L engine, and more so when compared with the old G120 from Gen3 which had 8.9s 0-100 km.
The lantis. 1.8 motors. 9.3 s. Mazda 3 no performans. Mazda very security..
122 horsepower.. really? My suzuki swift have more power. Needs power this car
the horse power not is all
@@humanchannel3548 It has a low torque aswell
Ahhh, the Mazda 3...
- Infotainment system? Check
- LED lights? Check
- HUD? Check
- Underbody rusted away in 6 months? Yep, check.
your saying bullshit
Hopefully more than 6 years...
2 years now, and its like the first day. My car sleeps on the street and I live next to a river. When are you going to correct the stupidity you said? Let me guess, never, because what you care about is saying stupid things to discredit what others have.
0-100 is 11s?
Omg, this is very very weak. :/
Detuned engine
People don't even read... It's a 1.5 liters on this one...
No it’s not
2l indeed.
😂
Slow
Very slow
Much older cars with 2.0 engine can send this car straight to hell
The pedal hit the floor around 5:10. The car crossed (where a Vbox would stop) at around 5:23. 12-13 seconds???
It's not only about performance now is it. Mazda have thought about how they could make the engine perform alright while still being efficient..And they seem to have done a good job
@@nobody1194 Really? Use a timer or video editor to see that difference.
It accelerates at exactly 5:10:32 seconds, and reaches 100 at 5:21:36.
11.04 seconds, which for an automatic gearbox and 122 HP is pretty good. With manual gearbox it is around 10 seconds (official acceleration time), there are even people who lower it to 9.8.
How is time measured in your country?
Including my 19 year old A4 with 2.0l naturally aspirated engine. I have 200Nm already at 2000rpm, and can do 0-100 just under 10 sec.