I doubt if the material used to make the Gamma AR pants (Burly™ Double Weave-46% nylon, 46% polyester, 8% elastane, 275 g/m²) is the same as the material used to construct the Gamma jacket (Wee Burly Double Weave - 56% nylon, 34% polyester, 10% elastane). Both seem to be double weave fabrics as the name suggests. However, Wee Burly double weave seems to have slightly different composition compared to the Burly double weave. Since you own apparel made from both fabrics (I only own Gamma AR and the Align MX pants - both made of Burly double weave), perhaps you can comment on the difference in handfeel between Burly double weave and Wee Burly double weave?
As always, thank you so much for the informative video. One thing, though, the MX fit is different from the LT and AR - the MX is fitted whereas the LT and AR are a regular fit, so there are implications regarding what you can layer underneath. Another difference is the leg pattern - the MX is tappered towards the bottom whereas the others are straight leg which means the MX won’t fit over ski boots whereas the AR will.
Thank you for that information, I guess that i didn't really notice that the bottom hems were a bit different. The LT, AR and MX all fit me really well. I do see what you mean as far as the MX being a bit trimmer. But I have worn my base layer under them. I guess everyone it a bit different. Also, I'm not a skier, so I would not have thought of how they would fit over ski boots. So thank you for your insights! It's good information that may help someone.🙂
Just got a pair of the ARs. I'm very tough on my gear, particularly trousers, so will be interested to see how they hold up! The only thing I was thinking about the MX vs the LT plus base layer: Although you'll have to buy a separate base layer which might end up costing about the same anyway, you then have two options vs. one. If you get the MX, they'll probably be too warm for spring/summer. If you get the LT with base layer, you can wear them without the base layer in warmer weather and with it in colder weather. It's the same reason I don't really buy insulated waterproof jackets - I'd much rather have the option to wear a shell standalone if I'm doing a lot of activity than be constrained to wearing a warm jacket if it rains. I can always put an insulating layer on underneath if it's too cold. Just a thought!
You're right, having separate pieces leads to more options. In really cold weather, I have worn a base layer under my MX's. That works too. I think that you'll be happy with the durability of the AR's.
They are all pretty durable, I would say that the AR is the toughest, followed by the MX, then the Gamma LT. But all should be fine, it would just depend on how cold the weather is.
According to the website, the ARs are heavier than the MXs. Apparently the weight of the pants within the same series isn't an indication of how warm they are. The price seems to be a better indication.
I just looked at that... Your right. The AR's are a tough, durable pant, but I would have guessed that the MX's would be a bit heavier. The MX's are warmer. No question there. But what is interesting is that the Gamma MX hoody is listed heavier than the Gamma jacket hoody. Both jackets are the same as the pants... so why would the gamma MX jacket be heavier than the Gamma jacket???
@@meandmyjackets There are many inconsistencies in their lineup. I really wouldn't require an explanation as to why that is had they given each garment a warmth rating, a breathability rating, a wind protection rating, etc. etc, but they refuse to.do so saying that those performance parameters are a function of many factors, including layering, temperature, etc. etc. In the absence of such ratings, we are basically left on our own trying to figure out how each garment performs purely based on the specs, but the specs don't always make sense. That's why I watch videos like yours trying to make sense of it all. I've also come across Gear Lab. I'm going off of their assessments too.
I hear what your saying, That's one reason why I do these videos. I do try to explain what these products are all about, at least in my experience. @@khalid969
I doubt if the material used to make the Gamma AR pants (Burly™ Double Weave-46% nylon, 46% polyester, 8% elastane, 275 g/m²) is the same as the material used to construct the Gamma jacket (Wee Burly Double Weave - 56% nylon, 34% polyester, 10% elastane). Both seem to be double weave fabrics as the name suggests. However, Wee Burly double weave seems to have slightly different composition compared to the Burly double weave. Since you own apparel made from both fabrics (I only own Gamma AR and the Align MX pants - both made of Burly double weave), perhaps you can comment on the difference in handfeel between Burly double weave and Wee Burly double weave?
They both look and feel similar. My Gamma LT jacket does have a bit more stretch to it, but the material on each is very similar.
Getting the MX ,great information thank you Chris.
Cool, I'm sure that you'll be happy with them. They are my favorite.
As always, thank you so much for the informative video. One thing, though, the MX fit is different from the LT and AR - the MX is fitted whereas the LT and AR are a regular fit, so there are implications regarding what you can layer underneath. Another difference is the leg pattern - the MX is tappered towards the bottom whereas the others are straight leg which means the MX won’t fit over ski boots whereas the AR will.
Thank you for that information, I guess that i didn't really notice that the bottom hems were a bit different. The LT, AR and MX all fit me really well. I do see what you mean as far as the MX being a bit trimmer. But I have worn my base layer under them. I guess everyone it a bit different. Also, I'm not a skier, so I would not have thought of how they would fit over ski boots. So thank you for your insights! It's good information that may help someone.🙂
Love my gamma pants. I recently bought the gamma jogger in Tatsu color, and I hope I will like the fit.
How you like the joggers?
@@skalien51 I returned it, I didn’t like the color and the cuffs. The Lululemon abc joggers are better.
Just got a pair of the ARs. I'm very tough on my gear, particularly trousers, so will be interested to see how they hold up!
The only thing I was thinking about the MX vs the LT plus base layer: Although you'll have to buy a separate base layer which might end up costing about the same anyway, you then have two options vs. one. If you get the MX, they'll probably be too warm for spring/summer. If you get the LT with base layer, you can wear them without the base layer in warmer weather and with it in colder weather.
It's the same reason I don't really buy insulated waterproof jackets - I'd much rather have the option to wear a shell standalone if I'm doing a lot of activity than be constrained to wearing a warm jacket if it rains. I can always put an insulating layer on underneath if it's too cold. Just a thought!
You're right, having separate pieces leads to more options. In really cold weather, I have worn a base layer under my MX's. That works too.
I think that you'll be happy with the durability of the AR's.
Which pants would you where to camp in. Would the knee hold up to kneeling to light a fire?
They are all pretty durable, I would say that the AR is the toughest, followed by the MX, then the Gamma LT. But all should be fine, it would just depend on how cold the weather is.
Just wondering, would it be possible to wear the gamma ar in temperatures around 20-25 celcius? Would I suffer in the heat 😂
Love your videos
Thank You! 🙂
i just found your channel i love you so much for your information!
Thank You, I hope that the videos help you.
AR for general outdoor was very good. Not getting MX yet
According to the website, the ARs are heavier than the MXs. Apparently the weight of the pants within the same series isn't an indication of how warm they are. The price seems to be a better indication.
I just looked at that... Your right. The AR's are a tough, durable pant, but I would have guessed that the MX's would be a bit heavier. The MX's are warmer. No question there. But what is interesting is that the Gamma MX hoody is listed heavier than the Gamma jacket hoody. Both jackets are the same as the pants... so why would the gamma MX jacket be heavier than the Gamma jacket???
@@meandmyjackets There are many inconsistencies in their lineup. I really wouldn't require an explanation as to why that is had they given each garment a warmth rating, a breathability rating, a wind protection rating, etc. etc, but they refuse to.do so saying that those performance parameters are a function of many factors, including layering, temperature, etc. etc. In the absence of such ratings, we are basically left on our own trying to figure out how each garment performs purely based on the specs, but the specs don't always make sense. That's why I watch videos like yours trying to make sense of it all. I've also come across Gear Lab. I'm going off of their assessments too.
I hear what your saying, That's one reason why I do these videos. I do try to explain what these products are all about, at least in my experience. @@khalid969
Good vid.
Thank You!
what about the gamma guide pants?
I have not tried those. Hopefully in the near future.
thanks, waiting for it!
Just wondering, would it be possible to wear the gamma ar in temperatures around 20-25 celcius? Would I suffer in the heat 😂
I think that the AR's may be a bit heavy. The gamma LT would be my choice. It would also depend on your activities. The AR's are more durable.