Hazard ID and Risk Assessment

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 янв 2025

Комментарии • 23

  • @suresh140567
    @suresh140567 3 года назад

    Superb presentation maam

  • @bijaygiri6562
    @bijaygiri6562 9 лет назад

    thanks SONIA ,,,, i know the definiation of risk but dinnt know it very well..... thanks for that such a beautiful example ........

  • @k50159
    @k50159 5 лет назад

    Awesome tutorial. Thank you so much 👏🏿

  • @johnpaulreponte8323
    @johnpaulreponte8323 4 года назад

    This video very helpful especially the assessment part of the risk into numerical. Question, is there and literature or background of the study with regards to the assigned values in the components of the risk formula? thanks

  • @landview5095
    @landview5095 6 лет назад

    Great explanation. Tell me the logic behind putting values for for those three variables of the equation

  • @ali2826100
    @ali2826100 8 лет назад +1

    Can you upload More videos .these are very helpful

  • @shardulshinde7309
    @shardulshinde7309 6 лет назад +1

    What is the logic behind assigning numbers to the various texts. Would appreciate if this can be explained for better understanding. Many thanks and indeed interesting video.

    • @science-health-safetymusic2322
      @science-health-safetymusic2322 4 года назад

      There was logic already presented on that consequence, likelihood and the probability the formula used only is an issue if this is a standard basis in safety or only subjective approach for learning purpose.

  • @Gydeline
    @Gydeline 5 лет назад

    Thanks for the vid. Of course risk assessment is far wider than just workplace hazards. But some useful concepts here to take into other areas - especially the objective measurement approach.

  • @m.irfaniqbal9051
    @m.irfaniqbal9051 8 лет назад

    if a worker other than hvac technician will go, then risk would be high. so controls will be necessary

  • @gigagerard
    @gigagerard 9 лет назад +1

    A way to make your risk assessment figures look totally arbitrary.
    Ideally the quantitive risk assessment for such a maintenance worker should tell us how many years it would take for someone who does this type of work every day to fall to his death.

  • @rrycnmcllcre4334
    @rrycnmcllcre4334 6 лет назад

    How you get risk score?

  • @mohamedadamali8172
    @mohamedadamali8172 6 лет назад

    Super. Thanks and thanks

  • @rejijohn5424
    @rejijohn5424 8 лет назад

    informative guidelines

  • @РоманЖданов-д7ь
    @РоманЖданов-д7ь 6 лет назад

    Очень наглядно, спасибо...

  • @user-wu7ug4ly3v
    @user-wu7ug4ly3v 7 лет назад +2

    This is terrible! So, PPE in this case will reduce the risk by half (LOL). I hope that includes a harness and stable anchor point. Why not also install physical barriers? This would reduce the risk further to make it practically impossible, meaning it would reduce the risk from 25 to 10, but because your risk is "low", your conclusion is that no further effort is required! You are relying on the technician to be appropriately trained, to be wearing all PPE appropriately and all the PPE to be working appropriately.

  • @stevem5375
    @stevem5375 7 лет назад

    still no edge protection on the building

    • @science-health-safetymusic2322
      @science-health-safetymusic2322 4 года назад

      after the risk score identified as low no further control measures needed so better use qualitative risk assessment rather than quantitative risk assessment

  • @niyaskalayil
    @niyaskalayil 9 лет назад

    nice videos

  • @md.idrisali9210
    @md.idrisali9210 7 лет назад

    Good idea

  • @مساعدعثمان-ث7ح
    @مساعدعثمان-ث7ح 8 лет назад

    nice video