Mellifluous-sweet or musical; pleasant to hear. For those who are wondering. Come here for the cars, stay for the beautiful shots, history, and vocabulary.
imagine wearing cool leather jacket, piloting a spitfire plane, fighting in the biggest war there is, wining in a dangerous lethal dogfight and then landing your plane on a runway with flames either side, my testosterone level just jumped 10x just thinking about that
There is not an automotive combination that I look forward to more than a Catchpole / Carfection review. The quality of critique, direction and editing is second to none. Keep it up!
A sublime film piece as always. I do agree with the premise of "who needs SUVs" - regardless of wether they sell well or not. To quote Mr. Slowly: "it's all a bit unnecessary"... A terribly pedantic person would note that cayenne is actually a kind of chili rather than pepper :-)
Huge applause for Carfection, making a video that's very entertaining even when the car is not. The previous GTS cars were special, this one is just a discount Turbo model. I particularly liked the landing strip insight, though the overview of Cayenne nomenclature was just as clutch!
Wonderful as ever, and I can't help but wonder what the airmen of the Second World War would have thought about a German Porsche sitting pretty at the end of their runway.
From a German viewer's POV I have to say thank you. Thank you for the great content you put out, but also thanks for using words I've never heard before, enriching my vocabulary :) Today I learned "tenuous". Good stuff. Keep up the great work
Why do people insist on justifying SUVs by saying they should be driven off road. The fact that they give you an elevated view of the road and your surroundings, coupled with the ease of getting in and out of the higher seats is more than enough justification for these cars, and you never need to leave the public highway to enjoy these benefits. I have two sports cars and an SUV and I regularly choose the SUV for no other reason than the ease of ingress and egress it provides.
This is now the second recent new Porsche that Porsche GB have given to the influencers before Henry & Carfection. The 992 red Turbo S wearing the HUL numberplate got given to JWW and the blue cabrio has been passed from pillar to post including STG whilst the silver one went to Carwow before Henry. Now this Cayenne has also been given to influencers prior to this video. I really hope Porsche don't just follow the crowds with bland influencer marketing (from a marketeer).
Josh Williams IMO the people who watch and really enjoy Harry and team, are the people who actually buy the cars not the self exciting types who watch influencers!
Might also be a scheduling issue or when they get the final edit done, not going to lie I follow the other youtubers you've mentioned and they provide a different perspective. Mr Catchpole and the team are second to none when you think about it, doesn't really matter whether or not other RUclipsrs get those cars first, everyone still ends up here.
SUVs are popular because the population are getting on the old side, with abit of money, so they want something to burn the traffic light drag racers, but also something that is easy to use and get into and out of.....at least that my opinion!
". . . or tow a jet ski, won on a game show in the 90's." Did anyone other than me catch that? I thought it was hilarious. I don't like SUV's but I love the beautiful and rare lava orange on this one. Thanks.
I think Henry has touched upon an interesting test! How would a road-focussed "sporty" SUV cope in the mud with a set of rougher tyres and no other alterations?
one of the best video I have ever seen on youtube if not the best I do not like this car at all but the fact that you r travelling and giving different kind of info is great thank you for this difference
280,000 sales by Porsche? Really puts all others in to perspective. Then the car, and you're thinking it's better looking that the DBX outside and in too. Henry's diversions to salt production, actually quite interesting, but the story of FIDO is one I've never heard of. Great work by all the team for an inspiring review and superb editing (well done Charlie once again!).
First time I've ever voted down a 'Fection vid, but this got me riled. You might as well go for an SQ8... I don't understand these bullshit models, give us the RS6 or 4 or Merc E63 Estate or and shove the rest over a cliff. These are simply for those tools who tend to crawl around central London in convoy, waiting for Daddy to top up their oil-derived inheritance because they've got nothing better to do than end up on the AllCars channel. Next.
I'd rather compromise my life for a car, then have a compromised car in my life. The cayenne may have (and continues to) save Porsche, and I may be a snobby purist, but for me I'll always be a "car" guy.
The Cayenne/Macan are absolutely amazing for the sole reason, that through the sales of these glorified shopping trolleys, we have far better developed 911/Cayman/Boxster models. Of course, it then only stands to reason that the 911’s that pre-date the advent of their SUV brethren, are worth wayyyy more - go figure...
I drove quite a few vehicles before buying a Macan. It handles better and goes better than many vehicles out there. It's not a sports car; it's the Porsche of crossovers. Some need a vehicle that can haul the kids as well as be enjoyable to drive. Think of the alternatives....
John Malloy I hear you! Don’t mind my musings, I drive a 2008 Toyota Hilux everyday (with 200k miles on the clock!). The fun cars only come out when the weather is good and when I have enough time to drive the pants off them on some great roads.
The fuel bill would be horrific, and stopping frequently at a service station, would b annoying. I’d rather have a RR Velar, RR Sport, or RR with the most powerful Diesel engine.
Sad to see you jump on the old SUVs off road bandwagon. Vast majority of owners have no interest or need to take SUVs off road. That’s not why they are bought. Plenty of advantages to an SUV that is comfortable and fast on the road. I own a Macan turbo PP and a 991.2 GTS as daily cars. The Macan is extremely useful and comfortable for all sorts - going cycling, transporting large loads, towing my rally car or relaxing on a long wet winter motorway journey. It’s still the most used of those two cars. More useful than my M5 too which is too low and small to be truly flexible. So please get over the SUV off road review.
It is I suppose , a nice SUV, which is about as useful as saying any given Kardashian has value as a human, but can someone please explain why so many high end car makers are choosing colours that are pretty much identical to your average Prius taxi? Here in Canada at least, the ugly oranges, pale blues, awful pastel greens and the ubiquitous yellows, all in one dimensional lifeless tones, are also often seen on Lambos, Maclarens, Porsches, Corvettes, even Aston. Only Ferrari has stuck to colours that look suited to a supercar. Perhaps they want to look like Prius taxis? But then, even Toyota doesn't use those tones on the basic cars. Very puzzling.
Who gives a f* about this stupid bus? People buy buses and SUV's. That doesn't make them interesting except for shareholders. Why do people buy them? Because they are convenient , women think they are safe for their spoilt poppets and they drive down the autobahn in a pleasing way. That's it.
I like your channel and appreciate the work you guys put in, but this GTS Review is rather unbalanced. I don’t this review that any justice to this car. It is a GTS after all.
Slightly quirky and just a little lacking in balance but always forgiven because it's Henry. The car? It should be converted into an amphibious vehicle, rolled into the sea and left there. Very pretty flowers at the roadsides.
No one take these cars of road in Australia, stop talking about it. The reality is that you have a suv for its size and higher viability and v8 power along with all the luxury mods cons via a true sports car manufacturer. Full stop 10 out of 10, any thing else is jsut a load of crap and people just whining probably because thats who they are. Great car fit for purpose full stop.
It should be noted that Porsche's cheapest offerings have been SUV's for a long time. Also, way too many companies are using SUV sales as an excuse to stop improving, then cancelling smaller, sportier cars, instead of using the profits to keep the rest of their lineup up to date, like Porsche.
They sell like crazy and make zero sense. $140k for an thing that is not a sports car or a true suv. You can buy a Jeep and a cayman gt4 for around that and you could go to the track with one and up a mountain with the other. I will not be, because I’m broke.
No-one that buys this car is ever going to go off road, big tyres or little. People buy SUVs because they want to drive on roads in an elevated position and because it is a comfier ride on UK roads (generally worse then fields!). Not my personal choice but I get it and completely understand the attraction.
Car journalists are getting very creative these days. What is interesting is that there is always something to moan about...if this specific car didn’t have its bigger wheels or carbon ceramic brakes then he would be talking about how steel breaks can fade quickly in a vehicle this heavy or how bad it looks on these small wheels...
Unfortunately it is a 'form over function' purchase, as are virtually all vehicles in this category, so equipping it to perform its function doesn't enter the field of vision of the purchaser. The most effective versions are those that are most comfortable, as when sitting in traffic in its urban environment, one might as well be comfortable.
I'd rather have an estate car because they do drive better but an SUV with at least some off road capability is a better real world choice here in Australia if you need to need tow a pair of jet skis, small boat or maybe a race car on a trailer, do the odd green lane camping trip with kids plus handle the school run and drives to the beach. And if you can afford all that then you have at least another car to just enjoy driving.
I don't agree with off road capability. Most drivers just like to use it as normal on the roads. I'm surprised reviewer is out of touch on that matter.
I liked this channel for quite a while, but one thing starts to bother me. Why is every of your reviews positive? If all cars that you are reviewing are good, that undermines your credibility a bit. You never seem to be disappointed by a car, you never express negative feelings etc.
I am of an age that I can remember when there was a huge variation in the design and functionality of cars. Designers were still feeling their way; some cars were dreadful, some were adequate, and some very good indeed. Many were a combination of all three, but, gradually, the worst design ideas were weeded out. Believe me, all cars sold today are miraculous when compared to those of yesteryear and choice is now a matter of budget and personal preference, rather than (almost) life and death.
@@robertcook2572 Yes, I fully agree, however there is a matter of personal preferences. There are tons of cars which are good that I couldn't simply stand. Secondly in the same segment there are better and worse cars. If you take a look at other car reviewers (Top Gear, Fifth Gear, Chris Harris on Cars, Motor Trend Channel, CarWow, Doug DeMuro, ...) they often say out loud that they don't like the particular car. For @Carfection every car is always... "surprisingly good", which makes the reviews a bit bleak and makes me wonder if that's just their style, or trying hard to not step on someones toes...
@@B4ndItOo But I'm not particularly interested in whether someone else likes a car or not, based on some indefinable 'something'. The reviewer's feelings are unlikely to be congruent with mine. I prefer Henry's more generous style, where he presents the car, muses on one or two issues, then lets the viewer draw his own conclusions.
![2021 Porsche Cayenne GTS REVIEW on AUTOBAHN [NO SPEED LIMIT] by AutoTopNL](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Xgv8TySa6Ec/mqdefault.jpg)
Henry could review a potato and it would still be fantastic.
This definitely wasn't filmed using a potato.
These SUV's are sort of shaped like potatoes.
You dont like potatoes...😉
The original Cayenne design was inspired by a potato. If you look closely you can still see the spud dna still in it.
Mr Catchpole just said 'mellifluous' while reviewing an SUV. My life is complete.
I had never heard that word before - you learn something new everyday; or at least when you tune into Carfection you do!
Never heard of 'brackish' either... this is getting embarrassing
If _Frasier_ were mixed with a car review.
spelt mellifluous
Mellifluous-sweet or musical; pleasant to hear.
For those who are wondering.
Come here for the cars, stay for the beautiful shots, history, and vocabulary.
Thank you!
He's a bit pretentious for my tastes.
@@zekezero12345 There's zero pretense. Henry's way is cheerful enthusiasm.
Absolutely brilliant filming, narrating, editing - just a fantastic video as always 👏
imagine wearing cool leather jacket, piloting a spitfire plane, fighting in the biggest war there is, wining in a dangerous lethal dogfight and then landing your plane on a runway with flames either side, my testosterone level just jumped 10x just thinking about that
Imagine using periods and then big letters at the start of your sentences for a start.
I dramatic boi🤣
@@zuti071 Imagine being on your period and triggered enough to pull someone up on it lol
The base model of any Porsche will do just fine
The graphics on this is just *chef's kiss*
Stunning stuff as always from Henry and the Carfection team.
There is not an automotive combination that I look forward to more than a Catchpole / Carfection review.
The quality of critique, direction and editing is second to none.
Keep it up!
A sublime film piece as always. I do agree with the premise of "who needs SUVs" - regardless of wether they sell well or not. To quote Mr. Slowly: "it's all a bit unnecessary"...
A terribly pedantic person would note that cayenne is actually a kind of chili rather than pepper :-)
.... a chili being a type of pepper.
Jazzed up SUV With low profile tyres ..
Absolutely pointless
I love my Porsche Cayenne Turbo. It is great 500 horsepower daily drive.
Huge applause for Carfection, making a video that's very entertaining even when the car is not. The previous GTS cars were special, this one is just a discount Turbo model. I particularly liked the landing strip insight, though the overview of Cayenne nomenclature was just as clutch!
I would love to see a Porsche Macan reworked by the GT division, with the cayenne's v8 twin turbo.
I really enjoyed the segment on salt 😐
We see Henry and we click
Wonderful as ever, and I can't help but wonder what the airmen of the Second World War would have thought about a German Porsche sitting pretty at the end of their runway.
Thunder Pants Probably, “thank goodness the war was 75 years ago and everyone’s moved on”
@Thunder Pants, surely a question for the Daily Mail letters page?
ratbag98 Danke, gute Zusammenfassung! :-)
Don’t ever stop producing these car videos Henry!
From a German viewer's POV I have to say thank you. Thank you for the great content you put out, but also thanks for using words I've never heard before, enriching my vocabulary :) Today I learned "tenuous". Good stuff. Keep up the great work
Why do people insist on justifying SUVs by saying they should be driven off road. The fact that they give you an elevated view of the road and your surroundings, coupled with the ease of getting in and out of the higher seats is more than enough justification for these cars, and you never need to leave the public highway to enjoy these benefits.
I have two sports cars and an SUV and I regularly choose the SUV for no other reason than the ease of ingress and egress it provides.
henry the type of guy to have a relationship with alcantara
Prob buys his gf an alcantara dress
Why is the front still so ugly and boring looking?
The rest of the car isn't bad but the front design still looks aged.
Intelligent presentation would be gross understatement, really enjoyed watching video.
Always a balanced opinion and always well produced / filmed and an added bonus to touch on history & link it with the car.
Couldn’t agree more
This is now the second recent new Porsche that Porsche GB have given to the influencers before Henry & Carfection.
The 992 red Turbo S wearing the HUL numberplate got given to JWW and the blue cabrio has been passed from pillar to post including STG whilst the silver one went to Carwow before Henry.
Now this Cayenne has also been given to influencers prior to this video. I really hope Porsche don't just follow the crowds with bland influencer marketing (from a marketeer).
Josh Williams yep and those videos from influencers are likely going to get more views.
Josh Williams IMO the people who watch and really enjoy Harry and team, are the people who actually buy the cars not the self exciting types who watch influencers!
Might also be a scheduling issue or when they get the final edit done, not going to lie I follow the other youtubers you've mentioned and they provide a different perspective. Mr Catchpole and the team are second to none when you think about it, doesn't really matter whether or not other RUclipsrs get those cars first, everyone still ends up here.
Guys , keep this amazing content going, u r making maybe the best videos online now.
Is that Steven Wilson in the background around 7:50? Sounds hell of a lot like it. Once again, nice video, although I'm not a fan of the car
Why would you assume a lifetime of just 100,000 mi for a Cayenne? Those things last, they’re not fucking Peugeots
Looks outdated already, especially the front, boomerang
Agreed.......
An oversized, fat, lumpen, hideous and pointless car. No wonder it sells well.
Man ur life must be empty 🤣
Yawn
To be fair an SUV would be more useful to me over an estate. But I’m also a bit silly so just buy old bmws instead
I don't know why but I found found this ka much better than the Bentley bentayga or Aston Martin DBX
Please no more Alcantara. Shows all grease, sweat etc... Wears out quicker than your warranty.
SUVs are popular because the population are getting on the old side, with abit of money, so they want something to burn the traffic light drag racers, but also something that is easy to use and get into and out of.....at least that my opinion!
Wrong on every detail
@@Nemoticon and of course youre an expert on it.....
Fantastic video as always! Really been enjoying the history portions of recent videos, especially those related to aviation. Keep it up and great job!
". . . or tow a jet ski, won on a game show in the 90's." Did anyone other than me catch that? I thought it was hilarious. I don't like SUV's but I love the beautiful and rare lava orange on this one. Thanks.
Word of the day:
MELLIFLUOUS
He's good guy, just subscribe his channel ☆
Great video but i still don't dig the performance SUV trend
Looks as boring as ever
I think Henry has touched upon an interesting test! How would a road-focussed "sporty" SUV cope in the mud with a set of rougher tyres and no other alterations?
The connection you have been making between history and future is fantastic
This man is phenomenal
That was awesome!! Finally a something different from the Cheyenne GTS videos going around
Henry: your t-shirts are too small for you.
Small shirts are light weight. Hes a purist
Nice review, totally agree on what you said to spec the car in a more rugged off-road spec. Another awesome car from Porsche! 👍👍
one of the best video I have ever seen on youtube if not the best I do not like this car at all but the fact that you r travelling and giving different kind of info is great thank you for this difference
Never mind the SUV's
Find us a Mercedes 280 TE or even a M5 3,8 Touring.
And tell us all about those forgotten WW2 airfields !
2:26 malifluous? Henry you cant just go around making up words
the Wellness Channel - It's 'mellifluous'. Henry is just educating the masses. It means 'pleasingly smooth and musical to hear'
@@gjonno thanks, the more you know lol
280,000 sales by Porsche? Really puts all others in to perspective. Then the car, and you're thinking it's better looking that the DBX outside and in too. Henry's diversions to salt production, actually quite interesting, but the story of FIDO is one I've never heard of. Great work by all the team for an inspiring review and superb editing (well done Charlie once again!).
First time I've ever voted down a 'Fection vid, but this got me riled. You might as well go for an SQ8... I don't understand these bullshit models, give us the RS6 or 4 or Merc E63 Estate or and shove the rest over a cliff. These are simply for those tools who tend to crawl around central London in convoy, waiting for Daddy to top up their oil-derived inheritance because they've got nothing better to do than end up on the AllCars channel. Next.
Great review, very comprehensive and balanced views .......... Well done FIDO.
Make a video about the manual 992
I'd rather compromise my life for a car, then have a compromised car in my life. The cayenne may have (and continues to) save Porsche, and I may be a snobby purist, but for me I'll always be a "car" guy.
As well engineered as Porsche's are, in this instance i would would take a RS6 over the Cayenne GTS, certainly at the price of that particular spec.
Agree
Rs6 is cooler imho.
I prefer the Macan over the Cayenne and the B9 S4 over the RS6 which I think makes me the minority!
Agree but if you live down a country lane and ground out the usual cars 4 x4s are a must
E63>RS6
Pink Himalayan salt better haha do you think pagani will do a suv next or kerlingsegg humm Great video as per !!!
Drove one of these for the first time yesterday and could not believe the way it handled (especially in Sport+) - an outstanding piece of kit!
The Cayenne/Macan are absolutely amazing for the sole reason, that through the sales of these glorified shopping trolleys, we have far better developed 911/Cayman/Boxster models.
Of course, it then only stands to reason that the 911’s that pre-date the advent of their SUV brethren, are worth wayyyy more - go figure...
I drove quite a few vehicles before buying a Macan. It handles better and goes better than many vehicles out there. It's not a sports car; it's the Porsche of crossovers. Some need a vehicle that can haul the kids as well as be enjoyable to drive. Think of the alternatives....
John Malloy I hear you! Don’t mind my musings, I drive a 2008 Toyota Hilux everyday (with 200k miles on the clock!). The fun cars only come out when the weather is good and when I have enough time to drive the pants off them on some great roads.
pretty sure you do just buy the gts for the numbers, and the bragging snobbery that comes along with it.
Why you have left out Mercedes from your diagrams. You even added super cars like urus but left out regular consumer car like Mercedes-Benz.
It doesnt sound pretty good, the original maserati levante,the bmw m5,6 v10,carrera gt and the s2000,zonda... sounds pretty good!
Love Henry’s Reviews.. Really does make all the other reviewers on RUclips seem somewated dated and boring... Timeless!!!!
Sound better than BMW 4.4V8 and worse than Mercedes 4.0V8 what a middle of the road achievement Porsche, you should be proud of yourself shouldn't you
The fuel bill would be horrific, and stopping frequently at a service station, would b annoying. I’d rather have a RR Velar, RR Sport, or RR with the most powerful Diesel engine.
Great review and an excellent choice of locale Henry! The Burnham 'bends,' as we call, them offer an excellent workout for any car. :-)
Sad to see you jump on the old SUVs off road bandwagon. Vast majority of owners have no interest or need to take SUVs off road. That’s not why they are bought. Plenty of advantages to an SUV that is comfortable and fast on the road. I own a Macan turbo PP and a 991.2 GTS as daily cars. The Macan is extremely useful and comfortable for all sorts - going cycling, transporting large loads, towing my rally car or relaxing on a long wet winter motorway journey. It’s still the most used of those two cars. More useful than my M5 too which is too low and small to be truly flexible. So please get over the SUV off road review.
It is I suppose , a nice SUV, which is about as useful as saying any given Kardashian has value as a human, but can someone please explain why so many high end car makers are choosing colours that are pretty much identical to your average Prius taxi? Here in Canada at least, the ugly oranges, pale blues, awful pastel greens and the ubiquitous yellows, all in one dimensional lifeless tones, are also often seen on Lambos, Maclarens, Porsches, Corvettes, even Aston. Only Ferrari has stuck to colours that look suited to a supercar. Perhaps they want to look like Prius taxis? But then, even Toyota doesn't use those tones on the basic cars. Very puzzling.
Who gives a f* about this stupid bus? People buy buses and SUV's. That doesn't make them interesting except for shareholders. Why do people buy them? Because they are convenient , women think they are safe for their spoilt poppets and they drive down the autobahn in a pleasing way. That's it.
I like your channel and appreciate the work you guys put in, but this GTS Review is rather unbalanced. I don’t this review that any justice to this car. It is a GTS after all.
Slightly quirky and just a little lacking in balance but always forgiven because it's Henry. The car? It should be converted into an amphibious vehicle, rolled into the sea and left there. Very pretty flowers at the roadsides.
No one take these cars of road in Australia, stop talking about it. The reality is that you have a suv for its size and higher viability and v8 power along with all the luxury mods cons via a true sports car manufacturer. Full stop 10 out of 10, any thing else is jsut a load of crap and people just whining probably because thats who they are. Great car fit for purpose full stop.
Mellifluous. Something electric cars can only dream of.
It should be noted that Porsche's cheapest offerings have been SUV's for a long time.
Also, way too many companies are using SUV sales as an excuse to stop improving, then cancelling smaller, sportier cars, instead of using the profits to keep the rest of their lineup up to date, like Porsche.
Fuel consumption was very misleading. Just say if you’re hard on the peddle it’s gonna be less than the 17/22
So Porsche says the family car can be loud but the sports car has to be quite? I guess that’s logical.
They sell like crazy and make zero sense. $140k for an thing that is not a sports car or a true suv. You can buy a Jeep and a cayman gt4 for around that and you could go to the track with one and up a mountain with the other. I will not be, because I’m broke.
No-one that buys this car is ever going to go off road, big tyres or little. People buy SUVs because they want to drive on roads in an elevated position and because it is a comfier ride on UK roads (generally worse then fields!). Not my personal choice but I get it and completely understand the attraction.
Yet another petrol heads televisual feast, wonderful as always Henry.
Perfect video for me a great review presented superbly with a nice sprinkle of historic places and stories well done guys!!
Yet another amazing review of the car and history, this man is the benchmark......
Great SUV if your family like being thrown around and you like being screamed at by your wife for accelerating and braking too hard.
Car journalists are getting very creative these days. What is interesting is that there is always something to moan about...if this specific car didn’t have its bigger wheels or carbon ceramic brakes then he would be talking about how steel breaks can fade quickly in a vehicle this heavy or how bad it looks on these small wheels...
Unfortunately it is a 'form over function' purchase, as are virtually all vehicles in this category, so equipping it to perform its function doesn't enter the field of vision of the purchaser. The most effective versions are those that are most comfortable, as when sitting in traffic in its urban environment, one might as well be comfortable.
It was interesting to listen 2 stories about historical places behind the main theme about great V8 GTS
lame
Another great review, Henry! Favourite Auto channel on YT!
Great 70"s 911 t shirt Henry.
I'd rather have an estate car because they do drive better but an SUV with at least some off road capability is a better real world choice here in Australia if you need to need tow a pair of jet skis, small boat or maybe a race car on a trailer, do the odd green lane camping trip with kids plus handle the school run and drives to the beach. And if you can afford all that then you have at least another car to just enjoy driving.
I don't agree with off road capability. Most drivers just like to use it as normal on the roads. I'm surprised reviewer is out of touch on that matter.
Can’t decide if I’ve been watching a history lesson or a car review. Great stuff guys 👍
I truly enjoys this channel’s reviews...
Epic video. Hilariously tenuous but interesting nonetheless. Lovely bit of journalism
Totally agree, but would add that only HC can pull off such tenuousness so elegantly
The RR Sport 5.0 SC V8 & the SVR still sound better and are worth more for the price.
What a bizarre conversation about the fuel usage. Undeniably interesting
please make a 2020 GLE 63S VS 2020 Cayenne GTS comparison
Currently own a 958.1 turbo. Pretty sure I want one of these next.
If Henry catchpole doesn't narrate my ulogy at my funeral im not going
SUV's ain't my thing but the fact Cayenne changed Porsche's sales in the whole world and the little Macan as well can't be denied!
Saved the company and has made it possible for them to put cash in to R&D for their sports cars and the electric lineup.
...yawn. The same, tired platform.
Very nice colour
I have no interest in this car, I clicked on the video to give you a view as I love the channel. Goodbye.
I liked this channel for quite a while, but one thing starts to bother me. Why is every of your reviews positive? If all cars that you are reviewing are good, that undermines your credibility a bit. You never seem to be disappointed by a car, you never express negative feelings etc.
I am of an age that I can remember when there was a huge variation in the design and functionality of cars. Designers were still feeling their way; some cars were dreadful, some were adequate, and some very good indeed. Many were a combination of all three, but, gradually, the worst design ideas were weeded out. Believe me, all cars sold today are miraculous when compared to those of yesteryear and choice is now a matter of budget and personal preference, rather than (almost) life and death.
@@robertcook2572 Yes, I fully agree, however there is a matter of personal preferences. There are tons of cars which are good that I couldn't simply stand. Secondly in the same segment there are better and worse cars. If you take a look at other car reviewers (Top Gear, Fifth Gear, Chris Harris on Cars, Motor Trend Channel, CarWow, Doug DeMuro, ...) they often say out loud that they don't like the particular car. For @Carfection every car is always... "surprisingly good", which makes the reviews a bit bleak and makes me wonder if that's just their style, or trying hard to not step on someones toes...
@@B4ndItOo But I'm not particularly interested in whether someone else likes a car or not, based on some indefinable 'something'. The reviewer's feelings are unlikely to be congruent with mine. I prefer Henry's more generous style, where he presents the car, muses on one or two issues, then lets the viewer draw his own conclusions.
@@robertcook2572 sure, I get your point. Matter of personal preferences after all.