Private Goods : products that are excludable and rival. (jeans) Common Resources: products or resources that are non-excludable but rival (tuna in the ocean) Club Goods : products that are excludable but non-rival. (cable TV) Public Goods : products that are non-excludable and non-rival. (street lighting) (free rider problem)
So Public Goods would be considered a free rider problem if taxpayers are funding it? She did say that the free rider problem describes someone who gets a good or service without paying for it.
Flaming Basketball Club the free rider problem comes in with regard to taxpayers with people like me. I avoid paying taxes as much as possible, while you pay your "fair share". The government has to borrow trillions of dollars to make up for this shortfall. So when the government kills me or locks me in a cage, the moral justification is that I was a free rider and not paying my fair share, while still enjoying all the benefits.
So the public good turned on its head in terms of the free rider problem could instigate big business who benefits from the infrastructure and commercial history of a country without paying its due taxes for future generations to similarly benefit.
Lol corporations pay huge taxes.. and here's a crazy fact.. if you make less than 100 grand a year.. youre a net negative to the government, because your taxes don't cover how much you cost the country.
If people are getting taxed for things that they don't get any benefits for and instead those benefits are going to people who don't pay for their goods or services, then how is that not theft?
I think one needs to consider good and bad haves and have-nots. If an individual has way more resources than s/he needs, but doesn’t give any to those who have none, the problem seems to become ethical. Only danger of harm from others could warrant not helping them. So I guess I need to find out how the other end of the problem is dealt with. The other problem I have is with the free riders possible negative effects on the outcome. Shouldn’t we consider the possibility that we could of gotten a worse grade had we allowed the free rider to participate in the project?
Natanael Esoxi I can clarify if u clarify. What are the characteristics of the person who doesn’t want to do charity, especially social class? How are u defining “charity”? I know what the word means. But since I didn’t use it in my original comment, I need u to be clear what u’re referring to. And is the charity, whatever it maybe but I’m assuming some positive action, necessary or merely wanted?
1 - What are the characteristics of the person who doesn’t want to do charity, especially social class? Not important, a persons rights shouldnt be determined by their social or economical status. 2 - How are u defining “charity”? As google says: "the voluntary giving of help, typically in the form of money, to those in need.". 3 - I need u to be clear what u’re referring to As you say: "has way more resources than s/he needs, but doesn’t give any to those". Giving away what one possesses is charity, when voluntary, and theft otherwise.
Private Goods
: products that are excludable and rival. (jeans)
Common Resources: products or resources that are non-excludable but rival (tuna in the ocean)
Club Goods
: products that are excludable but non-rival. (cable TV)
Public Goods
: products that are non-excludable and non-rival. (street lighting) (free rider problem)
So Public Goods would be considered a free rider problem if taxpayers are funding it? She did say that the free rider problem describes someone who gets a good or service without paying for it.
Flaming Basketball Club - well not everyone pays taxes that’s the thing
Flaming Basketball Club the free rider problem comes in with regard to taxpayers with people like me. I avoid paying taxes as much as possible, while you pay your "fair share". The government has to borrow trillions of dollars to make up for this shortfall. So when the government kills me or locks me in a cage, the moral justification is that I was a free rider and not paying my fair share, while still enjoying all the benefits.
Boristien405 That is true.
aletoledo1 hmmmm
Free rider problem applies to all goods
Hola amigos de economia
So the public good turned on its head in terms of the free rider problem could instigate big business who benefits from the infrastructure and commercial history of a country without paying its due taxes for future generations to similarly benefit.
Lol corporations pay huge taxes.. and here's a crazy fact.. if you make less than 100 grand a year.. youre a net negative to the government, because your taxes don't cover how much you cost the country.
Something the "taxation is theft" people need to see.
How does what u said make sense? It’s literally the opposite.
If people are getting taxed for things that they don't get any benefits for and instead those benefits are going to people who don't pay for their goods or services, then how is that not theft?
@@thiagofelipe3229 what he meant is people who says taxation is theft, should watch the video
Aka. Why "free programs" never work in the long run.
Awesome
UV thing Archi Rubin TV Tucson
Free word download the
What is the background classic
music please?
j search up Minecraft trailer theme
@@shoziboiI meant background piano music at 00:28
What if I don't want asteroid protection regardless of whether I benefit?
🤓
If an asteroid was coming, fk it. It’s gods will
Any Indian 😊
Es geht nichts
I think one needs to consider good and bad haves and have-nots. If an individual has way more resources than s/he needs, but doesn’t give any to those who have none, the problem seems to become ethical. Only danger of harm from others could warrant not helping them. So I guess I need to find out how the other end of the problem is dealt with. The other problem I have is with the free riders possible negative effects on the outcome. Shouldn’t we consider the possibility that we could of gotten a worse grade had we allowed the free rider to participate in the project?
Why not wanting to do charity is an ethical problem? Would you please clarify?
Natanael Esoxi I can clarify if u clarify. What are the characteristics of the person who doesn’t want to do charity, especially social class? How are u defining “charity”? I know what the word means. But since I didn’t use it in my original comment, I need u to be clear what u’re referring to. And is the charity, whatever it maybe but I’m assuming some positive action, necessary or merely wanted?
1 - What are the characteristics of the person who doesn’t want to do charity, especially social class?
Not important, a persons rights shouldnt be determined by their social or economical status.
2 - How are u defining “charity”?
As google says: "the voluntary giving of help, typically in the form of money, to those in need.".
3 - I need u to be clear what u’re referring to
As you say: "has way more resources than s/he needs, but doesn’t give any to those". Giving away what one possesses is charity, when voluntary, and theft otherwise.
Natanael Esoxi well what do u want clarified? I see a possible disagreement that maybe u have, but I don’t see a question.
Why not wanting to do charity is an ethical problem? What logic is there in saying *_not_* wanting to do something is unethical?
將背包客污名化 爛