Why are there Four Madhhabs? | Dr. Mufti Abdur-Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- The major Sunni maddhab are Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali. They emerged in the ninth and tenth centuries CE and by the twelfth century almost all jurists aligned themselves with a particular maddhab. These four schools recognize each other's validity and they have interacted in legal debate over the centuries.
Whatsapp Channel: www.whatsapp.c...
You can find us on Facebook, twitter and instagram @ZamZamAcademy
Our tiktok account is @zamzamacademy.com
Soundcloud.com/zamzamacademy
podcasts.apple...
podcastaddict....
For publications: www.whitethrea...
DISCLAIMER:
No part of this video (graphics, images, audio, music) may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Link to fiqh al-imam www.whitethreadpress.com/publication/fiqh-al-imam/
Also worth listening to
ruclips.net/video/W7FJyiaGBrE/видео.htmlfeature=shared
I have bought that book. It really made taqlid sense. God bless you. May he raise your ranks in Jannah.
The four Madhabs have never been an issue for nearly 14th centuries. Only in the last fifty years we have some brothers unnecessarily raising this issue. Jazakallah Khair mufti saab
Only ones getting fingers pointed at them is the hanafis for being glued to a madhab evven when evidences are shown to them. Its not something that has emerged recently.
yes, and they are trying to establish a new 'madhab' wen all has been done before....
These Deobandis don't need Quran and Hadees. Their sheikh -ul-islam says, Mufti Taqi Usmani says in ‘Taqleed Ki Share’e Haisiyyat’:
For a muqallid, his imam’s fatwa is sufficient. He has no need of looking into Quraan and Sunnah for daleel (evidence). Having said that, if there occurs an issue whereby the muqallid finds a hadith which goes against the ruling and opinion of his imam, its necessary for him to have faith that he has not understood the hadith. If he leaves the ruling of his imam and takes the hadith of the messenger then he will go astray. Taqleed Ki Sharee Haisiyat Urdu copy page 87 - Mufti Taqi Usmani.
This principle( usool e karkhi) has been laid down by Hanafi jurists about 1100 years ago and the Hanafi jurists / muftis still follow it.
usooli hanafi scholar Karkhee
“The ayah of the Quraan that opposes the statement of our ashaab (ie the Hanafee scholars) should be considered to be figuratively explained or it should be understood to be abrogated. Similarly any ahadeeth that contradicts and opposes the statement of our ashaab it will also be figuratively explained or understood to be abrogated.” (ar-Risaalah Fee Usool al-Hanafiyyah pg.169-170 and also commonly known as Usool Karkhee).
Wahhabism is aims at the calling (da‘wa) of people to restore the “real” meaning of tawhid (oneness of God or monotheism) and to disregard and deconstruct traditional disciplines and practices that evolved throughout Islamic history such as theology, jurisprudence and the traditions of visiting tombs and shrines of venerated individuals.
Such disciplines and practices are classfied as shirk (polytheism), kufr (unbelief in God), ridda (apostasy) and bida‘a (innovations). Its founder, Muhammad Bin Abdel Wahhab (1703-1792), forced his followers to adhere to a very strict and literal interpretation of monotheism and to fight polytheism (shirk). His followers, who call themselves al-muwahhidin or the monotheists, are labeled by others as “Wahhabis”. While tawhid is the core concept of Islam, Abdel Wahhab argues that the recognition of a unique creator without a partner is insufficient for correct belief and must be joined with ‘pure’ Islamic behavior. [Reference: “Wahhabism, Salafism and Islamism: Who is the Enemy?” by Professor Ahmad Moussalli, American University of Beirut,
Jazak'Allahu-khair for addressing this issue.
Please check out the following talk ruclips.net/video/W7FJyiaGBrE/видео.htmlfeature=shared
Subhanallah Allah bless the sheikh we are lucky to have a scholar like this amongst us so beautifully explained 👌👌
Madhabs are explainers of Islam and they are not contradicting Quran or Sunnah,it’s just that they tried to explain Islam according to what knowledge was available to them, some had extra evidence to back up their understanding some may have less as well as they never went against any genuine evidence of some Hadis and Sunnah.
Thank you. This was excellent!!! May Allah bless you all.
May Allah reward you and your family Sheikh. Aameen. Very beneficial and necessary talk.
Kinda like doing math with PEMDAS. depends on how you use this method..it will give different answers . This is why you can't mix and match the madhabs.. because they have different ways to come to a conclusion
Shame and Modesty in Hanafi Fiqh.
'awra' in front of (Muslim) Mahrams (unmarriageable kin)
The Awra of a woman in front of her Mahram men (those with whom marriage is permanently unlawful), such as the father, brother, son, paternal uncle (father’s brother), maternal uncle (mother’s brother), father in-law, grandson, husband’s son (from another marriage), son in-law, etc consists of the area between the navel and knees, and also the stomach and back.
Thus, it will be permissible for a woman to expose the following parts of her body in front of Mahram males: head, hair, face, neck, chest, shoulders, hands, forearms, and legs from below the knees. It will not be permissible to expose the stomach, back or any area which is between the navel and knees. (See: al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya, 5/328 & al-Hidaya, 4/461).2/10/2019
A Detailed Exposition of the Fiqh of Covering One's Nakedness (awra) - SeekersHub Answers
seekershub.org/ans-blog/2010/09/19/a-detailed-exposition-of-the-fiqh-of-covering-ones-nakedness-awra/ 6/12
This ruling is based on the verse of the Qur’an in Surah al- Nur:
“They (believing women) must not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband’s fathers, their sons, their husband’s sons, their brothers, their brother’s sons, their sister’s sons or their women…” (24-31).
It will also be permissible for a Mahram to touch those parts that are permissible to expose in front of them, provided there is no fear of temptation or desire.
Imam al-Quduri (Allah have mercy on him) states:
“There is nothing wrong in touching those parts that are permissible to see” (Mukhtasar al-Quduri).
However, it should be remembered that if there is a fear of temptation (fitna), then it will be impermissible to expose these parts even in front of Mahrams, neither will it be permissible to see or touch those areas of a Mahrams body. (See: al-Lubab fi Sharh al-Kitab, 3/218).
And Allah Knows Best
Muhammad ibn
As an american revert who was raised in the Bible Belt I can only imagine that this same type of infighting, extremist splinters, and general confusion would happen if europe and america suffered a total collapse and war. How would you possibly keep everything cohesive in a warzone? When the sacred texts are being burned?
And yet what a miracle that even a little mixed girl from Georgia, USA was called to Allah SWT. Truly Allah SWT is Al-Rahman Al-Rahim. Subhanallah.
If u want to learn proper Islam, listen to this Shaykh!
Always appreciative and grateful for your info
Mashallah, very beneficial lecture
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Ustadh, your edited version of the saviours of the Islamic spirit is only one book, while the original one by Molana Nadwi is three vols, are the next two volumes to be published soon or is your book just a summary of the original three volume one? Please do let me know because I was looking into buying it, but then this question came to mind
جزاك الله خيرا وأحسن الجزاء
Following
MashAllah .. Amazing video bro...
Dear Mufti, JazakAllahu khairan 🎉🎉🎉
This is ideal territory for a Islamic AI model to train on all Hadith’s and imams can tune the models based on their knowledge the previous scholars
I have to say as much as I like Mufti, there is a lot of hair splitting in the discussion. The ‘fifth’ madhhab he talks about is presumably the salafi movement.
‘In 90% of the issues, the madhhabs are all the same.’ Agree 100% !! However the rest of the discussion goes on about ‘conflicting methodologies’ and ‘cheating’ and ‘Nats’ etc. Frankly for most educated Muslims, this is complete nonsense. Perhaps the Mufti has forgotten one of the very last ahadith quoted in Muslim and Bukhari, where the Prophet[saw] made it clear not ask him about matters he has left unspoken. Thus matters he has left spoken about, he has clearly spelt out the nass that pertain to ‘amr’ and nahy [ command and prohibition] . The Nass of the Qur’aan is clear and laid out, the Nass of the Sunna has to be proved to be sahih[authentic] because they are the only ones which are legally binding. The Qur’aan insists on certainty in matters of religion. Thus the Hanafi school Invented ‘qiyasis’, deduction by analogy. This is not legally binding on Muslims, it is simply a fiqh technique to bring out a ruling when no Nass exists on a particular issue. Imam Malik based his fiqh on the amal of the people of Madina. His idea was the major companions lived in Madina, so it would be hard to believe in the basics of the deen, I.e. salat, fasting, hajj, umrah, marriage, zakat, divorce, death and inheritance would not be the same as the Prophet[saw] did. So to me personally, there is NO real differences between the madhhabs in the basics of the deen. You only have to look at the Ibadi sect in Oman, they were the first breakaway sect in Islam. Is there anything different they do in the basics of the deen ? I believe one of their scholars was a student of Aisha[rduh]. The second Sheikh goes on about the Sunna of the rightly guided Caliphs. If taken literally, it would make no sense. The Caliphs were all elected to be the head of the Muslim community in 4 different ways, so none of the legal judgments of the four Caliphs is legally binding on Muslims living now. This is just not some bida I have invented, classical scholars were already pointing out issues with fiqh rulings over a 1000 years ago, the most famous being Ibn Hazm. For a real understanding of the problems of fiqh, see the book by Muhammad Asad, ‘This Law of Ours and Other Essays’.
Masha Allah a well needed topic in our time for confused soul out there. 👍
who is the Shaykh with Shaykh Manjera
Amin
Excellent Speech!
One of the most comprehensive book on Fiqh and other broader topic is Toha tul Muslimeen
This book needs translating into English but honestly it covers everything at an advance level
🎉😢
Which Madhab did the prophet PBUH follow?
The madhab came from the prophet SAW.. Use ur brain don't ask questions like atheist ... Who created god.. What was before god... Grow up brother..
Still waiting for my answer on Student Loans? Tried so many ways to connect.
@@SealofProphets insha'Allah this video will help answer your question ruclips.net/video/IlnMMQ0XOKM/видео.htmlfeature=shared
@@ZamZamAcademy Jazakallah khair for the reply. My issue is, the recent ulema - shaykh Haitham and Sajjid umar said it is possible- and Mufti Abdur Rahman has shared platforms with them. Does the verdict for Mufti sahib need to be updated for hanafi followers based on the recent research by Shaykh Haitham? Or is it still impermissible?
@@ZamZamAcademy please see my reply
@@SealofProphets Mufti Abdur-Rahman's opinion is still as stated in the video
The Criterion Of The Correct Path.
Maalik Ibn Anas RadhiAllaahu Anhu narrated, “The Prophet Messenger of Allaah Sallalahu Alayhee Wasallam said, “I am leaving behind 2 things amongst you, as long as you adhere to these two things you will never be misguided, they are the book of Allaah (ie the Quraan) and the Sunnah of the Messenger Sallalahu Alayhee Wasallam) Muwatta Of Imaam Maalik)
These 2 things are pivotal and act as a criteria for every aspect in Islaam. So People who attempt to guide and lecture the Muslims without reference to the Quraan and Hadeeth are in essence not instructing us in Islaam. Sticking and understanding the Sunnah has great importance in our guidance to the straight path.
Alhumdolillah now a days people can read and study islamic books to work out what was the actual pattern of Islamic Shariyah does not like following blindly as you can see there is only one musallah at musjid e Harams not 4 .
This is the islam of the time of the prophet and the Sahabaz. Alhumdolillah Alhumdolillah
What are you going to comment about? Please explain whether it is islamic unification beauty of Sunnah or firqa parusti?
You are only promoting oan focusing firqa and bidah, not the actual sunnah. may Allah guide us all the path of Sunnah Aameen
May Allah guide this speaker
It’s not about “not following a madh’hab”
It’s about not rejecting a Sahih Hadith if it goes against your madh’hab
Indo pak and most of Asia choose to follow the hanafi madhab why?... Cause imam Abu Hanifa ra was a Desi lol...what's the daleel
This is the stupidest thing i have ever heard ... Grow up kid...
just follow manhuj-e-salaf and all the confusion you have will be gone. You are not being sincere by saying they say follow quran and sunna but actually they mean follow Quran and sunna and follow my few scholars. Thats a lie. Learn the manhuj the aqeedah and be on it. then you wont have to lie to have followers presumably thats what is making you lie.
@@0ArshKhan0 he lied when he tried to disrespect manhujesalaf!. is that being hanafi? deobandis and barelvis who are hanadi call themselves hanafi but claim to be on maturidi or ashari aqeedah NOT the aqeedah of abu hanifa! common deobandi or barelvis dont even know this. He is misinforming and misrepresnting manhujesalaf. why? i am presuming to keep hanafis as hanafis following him.
otherwise you ask him why? if you think he is doing it for Allah then lying wont help.
@@0ArshKhan0 he called abu hanifa a tabaee which he was not ...a historical fact. why lie about such a thing?
hanafee mazhub is the most different among the 4 mazhabs from Quran and hadees. All rge scholars he mentioned were from other mazhabs.
@@0ArshKhan0 so you guys are not on the aqeedah of sahabah . you should tell that to people who follow you. And tell us why you all are not following the aqeedah of sahabah and salaf like abu haneefa? And sofism is not part of Islam. So why be a soofee?
Why leave tareeqa of the messenger and be on some other tareeqa?
And abu hanifa was not a tabaee. its a historical fact not an opinion!
@@MrGYPSYSPADE
I don't ask anyone to follow me. I am a scientist, engineer and researcher in theoretical physics, theoretical CS and mathematics. And not an Islamic scholar or a Sheikh.
However, I am a student of Islamic knowledge and Islamic spirituality. My focus is on purifying my heart and nafs (to gain love, closeness, marifah and pleasure of Allah ﷻ) and coming as close to the Sunnah as possible. To become a person of Taqwa and Ihsan.
That's what I find the scholars and sheikhs I love and respect guide others towards. I have my Sheikh and I try to live as per the teachings he gives based on Shariah and Sunnah.
You can read about Sheikh Ahmed Sirhindi, especially his maktubat. He emphasised on following not just the external Sunnah but also the internal ones such as having a pure heart (filled with love of Allah ﷻ and not dunya), having nafs e mutamainna (as opposed to nafs e ammara, and other higher spiritual perfections. He is known as he founder of Naqshbandi Mujaddidi path.
I am sure if you sit in company of the naqshbandi mujaddidi mashayakh you'll see how they have stricter adherence to Shariah and Sunnah than we may have. The Silsila goes back to Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddique (ra) through the chain of mashayakh and from him to the Prophet ﷺ. Many of the mashayakh spend years without commiting a single sin. That's their level of Taqwa.
While people calling them misguided sin with their eyes, ears, tongue, and so on and so forth.
@MrGYPSYSPADE you do know that all 6 main books of hadith go via imam abu hanifa ra right?
What happened to 4 kalifs ? Why they did not create a single Madhab to solve all the issues as they did not have the access to ask prophet saw after his death ! ?
All sahaba were mujtahid.All sahaba were followable as ruled by Prophet (PBUH).Besid es s this Shahaba solved and had ijma on many issues like 20 rakat of taraweeh and 1st juma azan etc.Four fiqah evolved organically afterwards.
If four madhab have been accepted what would be the problem to accept the 5th madhab, ie break all madhab make a madhab bringing all four togather and declear the 5th madhab.
@@m.shamshaque1391 the following lecture may be of interest ruclips.net/video/gyvJr-bpDEg/видео.htmlfeature=shared
I am really shocked the Sheikh is mocking on those who say let us follow quran and sunah strictly.
Madhabs can be wrong so are you saying we have to stick the wrong opinion of the local Madhab. Subhanalah!!!!!!
Wahhabism is aims at the calling (da‘wa) of people to restore the “real” meaning of tawhid (oneness of God or monotheism) and to disregard and deconstruct traditional disciplines and practices that evolved throughout Islamic history such as theology, jurisprudence and the traditions of visiting tombs and shrines of venerated individuals.
Such disciplines and practices are classfied as shirk (polytheism), kufr (unbelief in God), ridda (apostasy) and bida‘a (innovations). Its founder, Muhammad Bin Abdel Wahhab (1703-1792), forced his followers to adhere to a very strict and literal interpretation of monotheism and to fight polytheism (shirk). His followers, who call themselves al-muwahhidin or the monotheists, are labeled by others as “Wahhabis”. While tawhid is the core concept of Islam, Abdel Wahhab argues that the recognition of a unique creator without a partner is insufficient for correct belief and must be joined with ‘pure’ Islamic behavior. [Reference: “Wahhabism, Salafism and Islamism: Who is the Enemy?” by Professor Ahmad Moussalli, American University of Beirut,
The 4 Imaam knowledge was is always will be better then today's so called sheikh..
@@Azamkhan-yv5th ...Why not follow the imam of all the imams, Imam-ul-Anmbiya Nabi-e-Akram salli alieh ua sallam?
@@nazeerpasha2075 yes following all Alhumdulillah ...
@@Azamkhan-yv5th ... But the Deobandi Shykh Taqi Usmani says,
'' not all just his own ''
For a muqallid, his imam’s fatwa is sufficient. He has no need of looking into Quraan and Sunnah for daleel (evidence). Having said that, if there occurs an issue whereby the muqallid finds a hadith which goes against the ruling and opinion of his imam, its necessary for him to have faith that he has not understood the hadith. If he leaves the ruling of his imam and takes the hadith of the messenger then he will go astray. Book source. Taqleed Ki Sharee Haisiyat - Mufti Taqi Usmani
there are so much of misinformation here at so many levels.
Instead of doing Shaykh's gheebah here, why don't you unfollow him or reach out to him and clear your confusion? A good person who learned from a good Shaykh would never do such a thing as you're doing here.
@@AA-gl9lq its deen to warn people about ulemae soo! Or even any wrong spoken about deen, so that people are warned against such misguidance. its not gheeba. And i am speaking to him in public! so it cant be gheeba by definition. I am not here to talk about how good or bad i am. i am saying this man is lying and misguiding..
@@AA-gl9lq The Criterion Of The Correct Path.
Maalik Ibn Anas RadhiAllaahu Anhu narrated, “The Prophet Messenger of Allaah Sallalahu Alayhee Wasallam said, “I am leaving behind 2 things amongst you, as long as you adhere to these two things you will never be misguided, they are the book of Allaah (ie the Quraan) and the Sunnah of the Messenger Sallalahu Alayhee Wasallam) Muwatta Of Imaam Maalik)
These 2 things are pivotal and act as a criteria for every aspect in Islaam. So People who attempt to guide and lecture the Muslims without reference to the Quraan and Hadeeth are in essence not instructing us in Islaam. Sticking and understanding the Sunnah has great importance in our guidance to the straight path.
These Deobandis don't need Quran and Hadees. Their sheikh -ul-islam says, Mufti Taqi Usmani says in ‘Taqleed Ki Share’e Haisiyyat’:
For a muqallid, his imam’s fatwa is sufficient. He has no need of looking into Quraan and Sunnah for daleel (evidence). Having said that, if there occurs an issue whereby the muqallid finds a hadith which goes against the ruling and opinion of his imam, its necessary for him to have faith that he has not understood the hadith. If he leaves the ruling of his imam and takes the hadith of the messenger then he will go astray. Taqleed Ki Sharee Haisiyat Urdu copy page 87 - Mufti Taqi Usmani.
This principle( usool e karkhi) has been laid down by Hanafi jurists about 1100 years ago and the Hanafi jurists / muftis still follow it.
usooli hanafi scholar Karkhee
“The ayah of the Quraan that opposes the statement of our ashaab (ie the Hanafee scholars) should be considered to be figuratively explained or it should be understood to be abrogated. Similarly any ahadeeth that contradicts and opposes the statement of our ashaab it will also be figuratively explained or understood to be abrogated.” (ar-Risaalah Fee Usool al-Hanafiyyah pg.169-170 and also commonly known as Usool Karkhee).
Do you want to be specific about his 'misinformation'@@MrGYPSYSPADE
Subhan Allah Alhumdulillah Laelaha ellallahu Allahu Akbar Masha Allah shaykh jazak Allah Khairun for the great great islamic series may almighty Allah bless us protect us from all kinds fitnah and give us true understanding of the deenul Islam with correct manner Ameen 🙏🌹💯🌹
lol Sufi
lol wobbler