What are the big problems with the system? They created this concept more than 12 years ago. A market disruptor (and a 30% efficiency increase counts as a disruptor) does not need that long to become a finished product that is produced in bigger numbers. So there must be major challenges with the system. What are they? Have they overcome them? If you introduce such technologies please talk about this.
6:09 onwards.. First up there needs to be a good seal between the 2 discs. But by far the absolute worst is the relative timing requirement of the 2 discs. This is made especially tricky with the once per cycle variation in pressure. Edit add: there's also wicked seal requirements between the rotor and the case.
I have worked in the industry, and designed compressors that are in testing. I am curious about about thermal management. It seems that their test runs are low pressure and therefore low heat generation. It is difficult to manage very tight tolerances on larger units when you start to have hot spots. This compressor has a cool intake section and hot exhaust that will have a larger temperature difference as the pressure increases, causing a change in the geometry. This is why traditional compressors have larger gaps. Most screw compressors use an oil wedge to help seal, that is mainly why it has a different shape and a tight spot. This does look like a clever design, but I have a hard time believing that it can be 30% more efficient. I have tested many compressors and the best way to have an increase like this, is when you put in a new system and fix all of your leaks. I think that a 3% overall efficiency increase would be huge, and more realistic.
Very interesting. Millwright here, it's important to note that thermal expansion is another reason why there are clearance gaps. In designs like screw compressions that have to have larger gaps than for example a reciprocating compressor because the materials expands towards each other. Vs a reciprocating compressor where the piston and the wall expands in relatively the same direction. (Although maybe that was beyond the scope of this video) The circle design of this compressor takes advantage of this and thus requires less of a gap. One issue with this design I am seeing however is that it seems like it would be quite prone to damage if it gets dirty or small bits of debris get in. It's relying on very accurate timing of two rotating parts moving in differing directions... ANY mis-alignment would be devastating. Maintenance of this machine would be constant and absolutely critical. (Constant filter change, I would even include a cyclone filter). Worth the extra efficiency. That said, if you can afford it there are more efficient systems out there. Large multi-stage axial compressors with intercoolers betwen stages have INCREDIBLE efficiency. However are extremely expensive to build and maintain. So it's going to have a niche role. It needs to be cheaper than the aforementioned system, but more efficient than screw compressors. If they can make it cheaper enough it could be revolutionary.
It's pretty basic shapes that are easily turned or milled (apart from the bevel gear) so tolerances & quality control should be easy to manage in volume production so costs should be low. The problems, as you say, are in maintenance in the field. In particular, the swept area & the number of seals seems alarming.
The other problem that it will have is exactly the same problem they have in Wankel Rotary engines and that's sealing the corners. This is why no matter how good of a technology other people have tried the piston in a cylinder works because its so easy to manufacture to a tolerance. Its why the invention of the V-bed lathe by Jacques de Vaucanson was so important to the industrial revolution. YT Channel "Machine Thinking" did an incredible video on that: ruclips.net/video/djB9oK6pkbA/видео.html
Depending on the application, the roots or screw compressor sealing gap is often solved by an oil flood system that takes up the space and gets continually circulated in a loop. While this adds some complexity, it also serves to cool the pump and working medium for more stable or predictable outlet temperatures.
I was a little surprised this wasn't mentioned. For all we know the supper compressor requires oil also? I always am interested in what they don't say.
@@dickmick5517 Go to the company page. He's not mentioning the operating pressure is 4 to 15 psi. But it is oil free, so you can use it in drinking water aeration.
@@proteinman1981 Exactly.That limiting factor should have started the conversation so we understand what we're discussing. Reach net zero? C'mon! Who are we kidding? It's psi. not kpa but still a pretty insignificant pressure.
I used to work as an inspector in the quality control department at a company that manufactured multiple sizes and grades of screw blowers, from stock engine types for offroad ATV's to the top drag racing ones that you see on those super long dragsters. They were such a pain to measure all the tolerances and such. The biggest ones had multiple profiles in their outer diameters so the clearances would change on different parts of the rotation. There were by far my least favorite parts to inspect. Super high tolerances, and very difficult to get good repeatable readings.
@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475as opposed to our traditional Western approach of simply offering the inspector's boss the promise of a high paying salary in 3-5 years time.
You could have used one screw to mold, lathe or hot forge it's partner in a jig with synchronised counterotating chucks. Or even pour garnet grit or run a sanding band along the gap. Rotational lapping. Easy peasy problem to solve. Did you have management that tortured and terminated intelligent people in the workplace?
@@aaronfranklin324 i understand your point but then there is the gap and/or the diference of thickness of old/new belts and the "marking" in the resulting piece, also, you would need to polish it to keep it smooth, and then measure it to see if it meet the 0.005mm standarts, so...
A big, low hanging fruit in compressed air systems is setting the system up properly for the end use. Most compressed air systems are designed for a common pressure, say 125 psig, but all the plant uses are much lower. I've seen plants where the plant air system compresses air to 150 psig and the maximum usage pressure in the plant is 25 psig. Of course, you have to balance piping cost against wasted energy compressing to an excessive pressure. But the piping cost is a one time expense while the wasted energy is for the life of the plant. And, almost universally, the air is let down across a valve wasting the energy stored in the over pressure air. The same thing happens in steam systems: generate steam at 150 psig and use it at 10 psig and getting there across a PRV.
Hi Dave, compressor tech and things like motor scheduling or variable / efficiency improvements are among the great technological leaps of the 20th century, you're quite right. I'd love to see a second video answering some of the excellent comments brought up in response to this video, a deeper dive. Specifically, what are the company responses to the filtration problem / multiple seals, turbulent flow patterns and opportunities, niches they see as most useful and viable, independent test results, and market issues. Thanks for a video on one of my favourite topics.
Do you think that regular compressors are inefficient? but they can provide very high compressions in single stage operations. You think that friction (only cause of inefficiency; not counting adiabatic heat due to compression) causes more than 30% loss in total?
@@terencefield3204 Cause the gaping inefficiencies? I've heard the affordability of off the shelf components and renewables could make the losses viable. Would you disagree?
@@anthonydunn729 the UN map of heat equation viability across the globe is clear.A tiny shift at the margins from a technological novelty does not amount to a row of beans.The rest is hope over reality and cynical marketing to techie types.
just googled and found out that Ford, Lontra, and Ricardo got a funding from the UK TSB to make a demonstration supercharger, can’t wait to see what comes of that
Turbine manufacturers solve the precision end gap issue for turbine blades by allowing the blade ends to be abraded by the housings with the result of perfect clearance at max heat and RPM. Similar abrasive machining can bring roots type blowers into perfect clearance very cheaply.
Most screw compressors use an oil to fill the gaps between surfaces, which is filtered out of the discharge air and recycled back into the system. Seems to work just fine. Change the oil every few thousand hours and you’re good to go.
Air conditioning would benefit from this. Cooling is based on the sudden expansion of a compressed gas, this would improve the efficiency of an AC system.
"Leave no stone unturned" approach. (With an Exceptionally thorough and clear explanation of how this device works). Rethinking existing products with efficiency in mind is too often overlooked. People want "New and Wild" all the time, but this design is revolutionary too (and you can even choose your direction).
I'm a Millwright, and one of the things we learned at tradeschool was the importance of reducing air leaks wherever possible. I currently work on locomotives, and air compressors are an integral part of the vehicles functioning safely. This new design sounds like an excellent solution to the issues of both the screw and piston compressors.
I ran a grit-blasting business for three years and lived & breathed air compressors, including a bank of 10 fridge motors to fill my receivers overnight and warm the office up ready for work! This technology could make liquified air energy storage more viable.
Late to the party here, but the sealing issues for positive displacement roots/screw type blowers have been dramatically mitigated over the last couple of decades by the use of advanced coatings on the rotor packs. These durable yet flexible coatings literally wear in to a near optimum seal upon first use. This is one of the reasons we can see compressor efficiencies on vehicle ICE superchargers in excess of 70% now (best I've seen is 74%, may be some higher). Turbos are more efficient still which is why we don't see too many OEM PD supercharged vehicles anymore, but the existing tech, at least in the automotive space, isn't nearly as bad as this video makes it sound.
Positive displacement compressors and motors are better for variable speeds. Turbines are better for fairly constant speeds, especially at higher flow rates, which is why aircraft, power plants, ships, etc. use them. The precision timing of this design would lead to a catastrophic failure if the timing mechanism wore even a little.
Ever see a rotary lobe/screw blower that has a little wear on the timing gears? Or that they were reassembled after maintenance off by one tooth on the timing gears? Can you say shrapnel?
@@michaelpatrick6950 Im quite sure that most air screw compressors only drive om one of the screws and the other follow, no need to use gears. Screw compressors are very reliable.
I think you want all pumps larger, not smaller. If you make a piston pump narrow, you decrease the surface area that needs sealed, but you decrease the volume of air compressed. Volume is cubed, while surface area is squared, so the sealing efficiency goes up exponentially with size. The one thing I'd be concerned with this new pump design, is pulsation or frequency. You'd need a flywheel to dampen it, or multiple compressor elements, since it would act like a reciprocating piston oscillating between peak torque and zero torque input every revolution. There'd also be an issue of the chamber opening up to the discharge port, that pressurized air from whatever the discharge port was connected to would try to flow back into the chamber unless the discharge port only open once peak pressure has been realized in the chamber.
used to work with ac's and cooling machines, it is really something i remember almost being invisible when i was a kid, everyone knows there are cars and trains and power lines, but its so easy to miss all the heat pumps that are all over the place :) and compressors are not all that efficient :-) at least for non industrial applications, a lot of potential there for innovation.
@@GaryGraham-sx4pm i have no idea what you even mean by that.. A vacuum pump minimizes leakage and does not maximise mechanical effichiency, and if you are one of these weirdos chasing me around the playground then you should maybe think about the implications a bit more carefully ❤️
I like how the design is relatively compact. This would be beneficial for automotive applications. Turbochargers are more efficient compared to screw and roots type superchargers but come with inherent flaws. It would be interesting to see this applied to get a good comparison of power and efficiency. Maybe even a compound setup to still take advantage of energy waste from exhaust.
I've just taught myself enough 3D graphics to draw my advanced, far more powerful Turbo / External Heat Engine and will publish on a youtube channel I have soon. A larger than normal exhaust turbine is backed by a sealed turbine filled with high pressure CO2, wrapped in a radial compressor, joined to the same setup on the other end by a hollow axle. Compressed CO2 expands with much force when heated. I have it pumping fuel, coolant and whatever else (ie. hydraulic fluid or second fuel type) in between, also cooling the middle of the turbo/engine. -- It's designed to work with an internal combustion engine that shoots exhaust gas into each side alternately, with the opposite side cooled by squirting high pressure coolant at the exhaust turbine on the other side, adding steam power and amplifying heat engine power that relies on a temperature difference between ends - HOT-COLD engine... It's a condensing exhaust system so the water from the steam is reused and cooled exhaust gases expelled (or compressed into a diaphragm that expands into the fuel tank to be dumped at a gas station).
As a mechanical engineer I can see many ways why this hasn't been adopted but the major one is the geartrain needed that not only changes the direction of power by 90 degrees (huge energy waste right there) but also has to be zero backlash for millions of revolutions. A roots blower only has four points of high precision contact where this design has a dozen or so.
Welll he did say they could get the same effect in less quality parts so perhaps even tho it has more its made up by the fact the tolerances arent as high.
heat pumps are progressively less efficient as outside temperatures decrease, ground source negates that affect with consistent heating at just the cost of compressor energy, and the 'lontra' principle certainly improves on that equation. my two cents worth is heat-exchanged to hot water with capacity and insulation enough for a week, but with the compressor directly mechanically coupled to a wind turbine, of any type, on the expectation of wind blowing enough at least once a week, with calculated sizing to acquire winter heating at zero cost and with zero electrical and electronic gadgetry (except perhaps for over-temp shutdown).
@@GaryGraham-sx4pm that sounds very complex and inducing losses in heat storage. It seems easier to me to just store the wind energy in a battery and drive the compressor of the heatpump with that energy.
@@thotmorgana hot water insulated with sand might be more friendly than batteries and an alternator and rectifier and battery management system and inverter and motor controller and motor to get the same end result: heat storage
I find your comparison a bit misleading. This machine can produce at max 1 bar of pressure. This is more comparable to a blower than a compressor per say. For example, your figures about global compressed air energy consumption, must include at least 75% of machines running above 7 bar. So this technology technically cannot replace the whole fleet of machines (just root blowers, multi stage blowers and so on, not so much the screw and piston compressors which - I think - makes up for the bulk of the compressed air production in industry)
Hmm. Interesting. I'd like to see comparative efficiency data and pressure plots. The exhaust port and blade intersection with holes and sharp edges induces a ton of turbulence. Seems like an interesting idea, but the devil is in the details, and the details still look rough. Looks like potentially high volume but low pressure kind of design.
With an increase in the required pressure, radial loads on the rotating part with small holes will increase significantly and uneven during compression. The bearing will not be happy.
I was a facility engineer in several manufacturing plant operations over the years and eventually into business. Now retired for a while but I used, and still do, believe that Compressed Air...be it plant service air, dry air or control air was the most expensive utility in the plant... Thanks for the introduction into a new approach to shoving a large volume into a smaller space... repeat...
👍🏻👍🏻 great video. I have a bottling plant where we use screw compressors for low pressure requirements ( upto 8-10 kgs ) and reciprocating compressors for high pressure requirements ( 36-44 kgs ) which are one of our major costs. Never knew the screw compressors were thaaaat old a technology. Thanks for the introduction to this new option. Would live more videos like that 👍🏻
Attach one to each hub of a wheel Make pressurized air move a turbine that's connected to a generator Each wheel contributes to the charging of the power cell Semi trailers- average have 4 possible hubs, that only roll around now. Make the _pulling of the trailer_ create power!
Thank you for your very clear explanation. I'm glad to see that the Lontra blade compressor is being increasingly applied to many traditional uses. At first I assumed that you would be talking about waste heat recovery from the compression process. It sounds like this compressor is most useful in applications where a compressor lubricating fluid can't be employed.
viscosity of a hot and high pressure gas is high and they tend to leak less. This is particularly important when the engine RPM is high and the process is almost adiabatic. Multistage centrifugal compressors are not inefficient and they can run at high speed.
Formula 1 engineer, Guy Niegre, developed a compressed air piston engine that can power a carbon fiber mini van 200 miles on 3x 7 foot tanks. Angelo Di Pietro invented a smaller, more powerful compressed air rotary engine & a new compressed air tank. The compressor featured in your video + solar electricity, combined with their engine & tank, may be the answer to zero emissions transport. Would like to hear your thoughts on these two engineer's designs, in a future video.
There used to be "fireless" locomotives, instead of a conventional boiler, they just had a tank that received steam from a outside source, then used the steam to power the locomotives, often in paper Mills or mines where sources of ignition are problematic. This can hold more energy than compressed air.
Well he didn't. He maybe made other beleive that he developed this "snake oil" mini van. Sorry, but likelihood of that being anything but a hoax/scam is very small. First an foremost: A compressor is a very inefficient device. Somewhere between 10-20% of the input energy is converted into compressed air, and the rest as heat, the lowest form of energy. Higher pressure =lower efficiency. Secondly: A circular tank 3×7 feet has a volume of roughly 1,8m3. If that tank was filled with air @ 200bar(same as a divers tube) the total energy content in that tank would be 36130kJ or 10kWh. Roughly 1/20th of the capacity of a Tesla model S battery. Third: This vehicle was driven by a piston engine power from the stored energy in the air tank. Piston engines isn't the most efficient either. Reciprocating motion involves continuous acceleration/deceleration meaning losses. I have a hard time imaging a efficiency anything above 35%. But let's say 50% for the sake of argument. That would mean 0,2×0,5=0,1=10% efficiency of the system as a whole. 50kWh electric energy, converted into 10kWh compressed air, converted into 5kWh of mechanical work. And he drove 200 miles =320km using only 5kWh. If we assume a speed of 100kph or 60mph he drove for roughly 3h. That indicates a mean power consumption of 5kWh/3h=1,7kW=2,3hp. NO, NO, NO!
I am curious to know what the difference in noise level is as well. Anyone who's used a typical air compressor knows it is typically noisy and gets hot.
Liquid ring compressors also leap to mind when thinking on low-leakage compressor designs. There have even been some fascinating patents utilizing them as heat engine turbines.
Very pleased to hear that this design is being used industrially. This is the best way to find out what the challenges of using these pumps really are. The cost of, and ease (or difficulty) of, maintenance of the seals will determine how successful the compressor will be. We'll wait to see what happens over the next five years with this product. Thanks for the video. 🙂👍
2016 was the warmest year on record. Co2 has increased every year since 2016.....hummmmmmmmmm? Well... things are a lot greener this spring so that's something.
It really depends on the product and the industry as to what provides the air for product blow lines. My experience was in the cereal business so we were transporting grain and flour. In this application, the air volume and not pressure was the most important thing so the equation was the distance of travel, type of product, feed rate of product needed, and how many bends which gave you the diameter of the pipe and required airflow which gave you the size of the blower and in our case we did not require expensive screw type blowers. In most cases, they were large volume low-pressure centrifugal blowers or sometimes the old-style roots blower. With smaller diameter transport pipes it was found that using a vacuum to provide the moving force was better as the air was not heated by the blower. The vacuum pumps were water-cooled. So maybe this is why you won't see a lot of these around yet as they will be more expensive than simple blowers. High-pressure compressed air in the factory was used for control devices and actuators which pertained mainly to machinery. So it really comes down to what pressure and volume of air an industry needs when it looks at what pressurised air units to purchase.
This is an ideal solution for medical gasses as a carefully selected metallurgy and seals for bearings would impart nothing from the compressor except pressure. 🤔 Diving air is another use where a hookah dive pump using this compressor could easily be driven electrically. This has a tremendous amount of applications and would be ideal for plant air with an air dryer. Great video 😀👍
"Free of ads and sponsorship messages" is an integral part of this channel, and I like that. It sounds really weird in this particular video; the while entire thing is an ad/sponsorship message for Lontra.
It appears that this new invention only deals with the leakage aspect of compressor inefficiency, but that isn't the only source of inefficiency in compressors. Thermodynamically speaking, the most work-intensive way to compress a volume of gas is adiabatically, where the gas increases in temperature sharply. The least work-intensive way is isothermal compression. This compressor seems to do nothing to cool the gas during compression. If you look at how much more work it takes to compress a gas adiabatically vs. isothermally, you'll see that this is a huge source of inefficiency.
Please share more on tech like this in the future! I've researched everything involving compressors and even follow someone whos making their own at home to power a race car with batteries attached and they've had great success with it in testing so far which is mind blowing.
Using a self running generator, with a kinetic design and stronger magnets, would allow us to constantly charge power walls or something else, to use in homes and businesses. Especially energy efficient 3d printed homes.😎🇺🇲. Solar homes that already have everything, would be able to easily switch over without paying very much. You'd be able to have clean energy everywhere all the time.
I love to see long established tech get un upgrade. Not all tech follows Moore's Law but that does not mean better alternatives aren't awaiting us. Thanks for making this video!
I wanna see how we can make other technologies much more user friendly and able to be used by everyone with little prior knowledge. Like a chainsaw. Its a technology that was invented in 1830, and as far as safety is concerned is still one of the most dangerous pieces of equipment we operate willy nilly. Chippers too.
I agree in general but with this particular one I would have liked to see independent testing & in-service reviews before giving it free advertising. From the manufacturer's videos it looks like it's competing not with piston-type or Roots-type compressors but with centrifugal blowers, their videos don't show higher than 1.2 bar which is vacuum cleaner & car heater territory so it's competing with pressed sheet-metal & simple castings. Efficiency may be better than these very cheap designs but efficiency gains are to be had on centrifugal compressors too & with no added mechanical complexity, just tighter tolerances.
There is less surfaces to be sealed compared to some other types of compressors, but there is the the extra complication of the 90° transmission that needs to be of very high precision in order for the seals to work fine. And for when the transmission starts to wear, the seals spaces will start to increase.
Hmm.... Is it back-driveable? Meaning, can I compress air into a storage device and later use that air to decompress and drive the motor to become a generator? Ya know, energy storage!
Yes it can they are call air accumulators and they can be used to power a lot of things directly more efficiently or by generating electricity less efficient.
There is alot of applications that also use a simple piston compressor, like O2 concentrators for medical applications. They use aluminium sleeves and a sort of compound head gasket that only lasts for so long. It is loud, it vibrates and needs to be serviced alot. I also suspect that the piston design overall uses more electricity to run because the efficiency is lower at the end points where almost no linear motion occurs. This is a very cool piece of engineering. And yes, corkscrew compressors or pumps are insanely expensive for what they offer because the screws and their bearings have such low tolerances across such a big surface area. This company is going places.
I thought this was going to be another video about compressed air batteries (a very good idea) but this was genuinely interesting and new! That is a very clever design for a compressor!
A really nice aspect of compressed air is that you can store large amounts of energy in a small space, enough to lift a submarine out of the water (been there, done that). And the compressor can be run by a windmill. Wow, no carbon footprint.
When you can assure me that the compressor can deliver 100-120psi pressure 24/7 for at least 80 000-100 000h lifetime with only basic service a few times a year (oil, filters and small parts replacement, 2h stop max), with more than 10% energy saving from screw compressors, then its a revolution. Screw compressors are a refined technology and new more efficient speed controlled motors and other things make them more efficient than before. They also rely on a constant flow of oil that seals and cool the screw, then oil is separated from the air flow, really smart actually. Got a brand new Atlas Copco GA45VSD+FF few weeks ago at work, hope its as good as our GA30VSD that have 92 000h and still works perfect.
This is a fine advertisement for Lontra, but the claims of 21% and 34% of "efficiency improvement" are unsubstantiated. "Efficiency improvement" vs what, a 60 year old compressor that is under maintained and improperly sized? The geometry of this compressor does not lend its self to significant improvement over other modern designs, and seal leakage is not usually a significant loss either. Almost all efficiency gains, in terms of reduced electrical consumption, are from pipe network leak reduction, proper sizing of the compressor for the loads, control systems that can vary the compressor properly, and maintenance programs. The compressor internal seal leakage is very insignificant to overall power consumption. I applaud Lontra for producing the compressor, but in an industry that is over 100 years old, the usual reason no one has ever made the "new" design is because it's not advantageous over existing designs.
I love when an incremental improvement like this is so effective, and you explained it elegantly. My one question: doesn't the Lontra design introduce a pulse that the Roots design doesn't? Isn't there going to be variability in the output between the start of the cycle and the end?
They both have pulses. The continuous roots blower screw version does ~not though. Much more expensive to make and rarely done. So, if this is much cheaper to make... then yes.
Yeah, I think the output pressure would oscillate on every cycle, but that can be dealt with using some kind of pressure smoothing mechanism. One simple method would be to put a large chamber on the output of the compressor. Because the volume of the chamber is so much larger than the volume of the "piston", the effect of injecting that oscillating pressure into the chamber would have little effect on the pressure in the chamber as a whole. I'm not a mechanical engineer, though, so there are probably better and more compact methods than this.
Like the Omega-1, these tight-tolerance metal seals sound great on 3d animations or very low speeds, but those are going to leak bad at full speed. Worse yet, they will get hot and cause further tolerance issues. Remember: Real metal seal blowers have a loooong metal seal and have limited delta-pressure
The website says "IF"... especially when it talks about savings. This is just hype to build capital because there are already very high efficiency "low pressure" compressors such as regenerative, screw or roots blowers to use for material transport in factories. Sure, compressors use a lot of power in industry, but not all of it is for very low pressure applications. If you compare any low pressure blower to down-regulating the 6-9 BAR produced by reciprocating compressors, the savings will be great.
I work with cryogenic instrumentation and piping which we pump down to about 10^-7 milibars. Super interested in stuff like this, hope we'll be able to intergrate it some day, allthough i'm afraid its volume/revolution isn't great enough compared to the spiral pumps we have now. Still amazing to see!
6:40 The small diameter of a bicycle tire pump is not to minimize leakage. The design is about matching the force that the average or below average person would be comfortable exerting. The length of stoke is based on the required amount of pressure needed.
That is a novel idea, loved the scale model which made it so easy to understand. If it can do what they say it can do will be useful for a lot of things. Wish them the best of luck with it all. Also there was a guy in Australia who built a car which looked more like the lunar lander, that ran on compressed air and used to it go back and forth to the shops, he used either solar or wind turbine to compress the air in the tanks and then used to drive around, although not big a n heavy family car it was pretty cool and he built it so he did not have to pay for fuel. Cant remember where i saw that but thought it was pretty cool.
We hold multiple pneumatic generator patents. We use compressed air to power 5kw and 10kw generators. Patents cover: design, operation, and tank storage.
Oh ya you mean The Di Pietro Motor, developed by the Australian company EngineAir, is a rotary engine powered by compressed air. The guy's name is Angelo Di Pietro.
Reminds me of the Astron Omega 1 engine. The intake part of the engine, that is. It's a pair of gears that counter rotate, except one has only one gear tooth while the other only has one tooth gap. The air gets trapped and compressed just like in this compressor.
In most compressors, all the final sealing requirements are ultimately met by appropriately viscous oil filling the inevitable remaining gaps between components. This design introduces all sorts of dynamically interacting seal gaps that need that oil film delivered to them and maintained. That would seem to be a huge can-o-worms for achieving maximum potential for the design. No mention of it though.☹️ (Unless I just didn’t pick up on it. That’s happened before…)
@@blameyourself4489 if you will believe what the videos says where it is already being used effectively in some factories and sewage treatment plants, then that means they have already solved the "can of worms" that you are talking about in those applications.
Hello. I am an energy efficiency engineer and I have been looking at air compressor and air compressor energy efficiency for around 15 year (if you want to talk industrial EE let me know :) ). There where a couple things I wanted to address after watching this video: At a high level any time you add steps between your energy and your use you add inefficiency. Directly using an electric motor will always be more efficient that taking motor load to create some side product (in this case high pressure air) that is than used for a process. We see this same issue all the time in industry when high pressure steam is used to heat water, why make steam to than heat water when you could have just heated the water directly and used much less energy to do the same job. Compressed air is much more convenient, requires smaller tool and is greatly embedded in existing industrial technology but it is a wasteful way of getting things done. This is because.. air compressor by design are very inefficient. About 66% of the energy in a air compressor system is used to make air hot. This is because of that pesky equation PV=NRT. Even with a air compressor that is 30% more efficient.. it would be much better to use anything other than an air compressor if you can. A 50 HP air compressor could be replaced by a 8 HP piece of equipment that could do the same job with 60-70% less energy use. Your example at the water treatment facility may be an issue of application and not efficiency of the equipment. This application would low pressure air and not high pressure air like what would be produced by a standard air compressor. This mean that you could replace the air compressor at this site with an air blower and greatly reduce there energy use, not because the air blower is fancy technology but because you do not need high pressure air. Lastly pneumatic transportation is a energy disaster when compared to conveyor belts. It is convenient- yes, does it use 4 times as much energy or more to do the same job-yes. You can imagine this kind of transportation as using a semi truck to pull a very small car down the road. You could use a giant fan to blow beans 100 meters away or you could just use a small motor and a belt to do the same job. I hope this is helpful and does not come off as being a critic for critics sake. I have a huge passion for making industrial efficient but it will require more change than replacing existing inefficient processes with slightly less inefficient processes.
You're right they needed clean oil-free air, volume counts more than pressure. The webpage says the compressor is for low or high pressure applications, flow rate 350 to 1550 CFM, outlet pressure 4 to 15 PSI. Pretty much all it can do is blow clean bubbles and a bit of wind.
@@edbruder9975 15 psi is not industrial compressed air. Industrial compressed air runs in the range of 100 psi or more. This technology would not apply to the vast majority of industrial compressed air and should not be claimed as such. Pneumatic system seem to be operable at the 15 psi range but this does not account for pressure drop across distances. These systems only meet the min requirement for pneumatic systems but 100 ft is around 10 PSI drop or more for common material meaning this would not be applicable for this application for any reasonable distance.
Great video. I wonder if rotating the pump the other way would give a vacuum pump, and whether the pump can be used as a motor if you apply compressed air to the output
I work in a Natural gas power plant and we use dozens of various compressors for a multitude of tasks. This tech and others like it could greatly reduce auxiliary load on the plant
The energy efficiency is not really about Heat pumps in its compressor. Rather the fluid, radiators. The mechanical compressor is the minority portion.
@@edbruder9975 Yes/No. See above. All improvements are nice; no one will bitch about improved efficiency, but we have no idea if this version scales or its gains. It sounds like it should but it is always those nitty gritty details which screw the works up.
@@w8stral On their webpage it says it's working pressure is 4 to 15 PSI so you'd need quite a stack of them to pump much heat. They shoulda started the story with 15 PSI but net 0 draws way more viewers and comments. Like you said the devil's in the details.
A trompe is a water-powered air compressor, commonly used before the advent of the electric-powered compressor. A trompe is somewhat like an airlift pump working in reverse. Trompes were used to provide compressed air for bloomery furnaces in Catalonia and the USA. The trompe is one of those lost technologies. Around the nineteenth century, if a mine were located near a river, they would install a trompe to use energy from the falling water to isothermally compress air. If developed again in could be a very integral part of solving energy issues without environmental damage.
Back in the 1960s Chrysler designed a No gas air conditioner called Rovax. Air was sucked out of the cabin and a rotary compressor to 30psi. The comppressed air passed through a common radiator which drew the heat out of it. Cooled compressed air passed through the other side of the compressor to recover some power as it was released. A filter sorted the ice out of it and 4F air went back in the cabin. 4 engineers took the Plymouth to the Ca desert where it was 104F outside. Temp in the cabin got down to 58F! No freon, no recharging, no service. They buried it and we never heard about it again....
I deeply appreciate the topics you cover and the approaches you use when covering them!!! Thank you! When I'm in a better fiscal situation, I will totally share through Patreon💜. (the road is paved with good intentions yes? 😋)
My home compressor is a screw type, it uses oil to seal the rotors so that the clearances don't have to be quite so perfect. The oil is separated from the air and run through a cooler before recirculating. Some oil does escape the separator and go to the tank.
The problem with efficiencies is that companies will tend to expand their output as a result, rather than keep the output the same and thereby reduce emissions. Not that I think this compressor efficiency is a bad thing, just that I'm not sure it will result in real-world reductions in emissions.
Very interesting video. I work in Engineering, and we use compressed air regularly. In fact, some machines we use are built to use compressed air in their operation, without that air they couldn't work at all. So important has compressed air become in our day-to-day working. I hadn't realized how much power is consumed worldwide in the production of compressed air though, that was an eye opener.
I'm amazed that those original Roots blowers could be machined to the accuracy needed 160 years ago. Then, when "they" twisted the blades, holy cow! BTW, the purpose of that is to even out the air flow. The original design was very pulsed. The biggest and earliest application was pushing air through Bessemer steel converters. Those big superchargers you see on dragsters come from GM diesel engines. I have an Eaton roots type blower on my Buick V6. 215,000 miles. Good machining!
Nice video! 2020 was a rough year for me as I lost my job as a college teacher due to the lockdown. I got introduced to Ms, Gardner, I opened up about challenges I was facing here in Norway, during my time working with her, I was able generate weekly returns on my investment in the money market. We still keep in touch, such an amazing lady.
Hi there, I had little knowledge on predicting the stock market, but with Ms. Gardner weekly analysis and advise profits are guaranteed! I received thrice my initial deposit in a week!!
I want to be financially free , I currently work 2 9-5 jobs and I’m struggling to pay bills along with my moms medical bills. I heard about forex a little while ago and was really interested and wanted to get into for the longest but I never had someone who could help. Can I get her contact? I need her assistance
Ms. Gardner gave me a wide option investing strategies, she introduced me to USD margin lending in which I was able to earn interest with no anticipated downside risk. She made my February a remarkable month!
If you go to the Lontra page, it states the compressor is for low and high pressure applications, flow rate 350 to 1550 CFM, and a pressure range from 4 to 15 PSI. Not like any bicycle pump I've ever used. Did I miss something here? It's being used to aerate water purification systems. It can blow bubbles to about 33' or so.
Having spent 2½ decades working in an industry that required a working air compressor for every minute the shop was running, and because of that fact, schooling myself on the workings of the different air compressors in the shop, I could see immediately how the design you're talking about would be a massive improvement as far as efficiency, necessary maintenance, and savings in energy consumption, lower downtime, and higher productivity. This I could see and tell JUST from my self-taught understanding of the various things involved. No college kid, here. Even my kids didn't get to be college kids. How others with degrees from B.S. to M.B. that should be switching over the rest of or all of their air compressors can't see that, I can't understand. 🤷♀️
You missed a new pump, the SCROLL PUMP. In the 1960s, when the inventer showed me his first working model at his home in Mason NH. He had made it on a modified drill press. It consists of one fixed disk with a scroll cut into it's face and another driven by an offset crank. with an inverse scroll . The scrolls were mirror identicle, each with the raised part fitting perfectly into the other ones groove. I recognised it immediatly as a truly new mechanical invention and suggested it would be a great clean vacuum pump. It had a Teflon sealing surface. The next I knew it was being built in japan as a large compressor (that needed water cooling). But now it is in heavy use in the semiconductor processing world as a clean, (no sealing oil) vacuum pump. The inventer Niels Young worked at Arthur D. Little Corp.
compressors definitely require a lot of power. I work in what is, all things considered, a relatively small factory and our compressors suck back about 100KW 24/7. That adds up to quite a lot of power very quickly. As for this design, the very precise timing required between the two spinning discs gives me cause for concern as a technician. Images of the two discs violently crashing come to mind.
By having a large sealing surface, it also means that a fine precise surface would actually be less useful than a rough unpolished surface. The friction against the bypassing air would become the mechanism of sealing. A smooth surface would allow more air to bypass. *This is a rare case where cheaper might be better.*
It used to really suck running airlines to a job in a high, hot and hard to reach area. Now we take cordless tools to the job. The savings in air related costs and total work is incredible.
Holy crap, stop the effing presses! It's 2023, and we're talking about a significant improvement in a physical machine. Not some arcane advance in chip design, not some new metamaterial, not something only comprehended by a handful of PhDs around the world. This is soooooo freaking cool I can't stand it! I love stuff like this!!!!!
You dont want to blow your product all over the manufacturing area for several reasons... 1st is the damage imparted onto the product being beaten inside that tube, so not all product is robust enough for such a method of movement. 2nd is static build up, plastic are notorious for building up static charge when being vacuumed and blown through transporting tubes, especially when the transportation tube are also made of plastic... I have seen a pallet box of plastic beads generate a foot long static arc because of such a problem.
What are the big problems with the system? They created this concept more than 12 years ago. A market disruptor (and a 30% efficiency increase counts as a disruptor) does not need that long to become a finished product that is produced in bigger numbers. So there must be major challenges with the system. What are they? Have they overcome them? If you introduce such technologies please talk about this.
There is a Variable you didn't Counted:
Utility of a Market Disruptor.
Nor Request = No Offer.
Exactly
@@antoniopacelli true lol, capitalism is often a factor left out. Even when it’s the most vital to address.
High maintenance costs suffering from low round trip efficiency.
6:09 onwards..
First up there needs to be a good seal between the 2 discs.
But by far the absolute worst is the relative timing requirement of the 2 discs. This is made especially tricky with the once per cycle variation in pressure.
Edit add: there's also wicked seal requirements between the rotor and the case.
I have worked in the industry, and designed compressors that are in testing. I am curious about about thermal management. It seems that their test runs are low pressure and therefore low heat generation. It is difficult to manage very tight tolerances on larger units when you start to have hot spots. This compressor has a cool intake section and hot exhaust that will have a larger temperature difference as the pressure increases, causing a change in the geometry. This is why traditional compressors have larger gaps. Most screw compressors use an oil wedge to help seal, that is mainly why it has a different shape and a tight spot. This does look like a clever design, but I have a hard time believing that it can be 30% more efficient. I have tested many compressors and the best way to have an increase like this, is when you put in a new system and fix all of your leaks. I think that a 3% overall efficiency increase would be huge, and more realistic.
Very interesting.
Millwright here, it's important to note that thermal expansion is another reason why there are clearance gaps. In designs like screw compressions that have to have larger gaps than for example a reciprocating compressor because the materials expands towards each other. Vs a reciprocating compressor where the piston and the wall expands in relatively the same direction. (Although maybe that was beyond the scope of this video)
The circle design of this compressor takes advantage of this and thus requires less of a gap.
One issue with this design I am seeing however is that it seems like it would be quite prone to damage if it gets dirty or small bits of debris get in. It's relying on very accurate timing of two rotating parts moving in differing directions... ANY mis-alignment would be devastating. Maintenance of this machine would be constant and absolutely critical. (Constant filter change, I would even include a cyclone filter).
Worth the extra efficiency.
That said, if you can afford it there are more efficient systems out there. Large multi-stage axial compressors with intercoolers betwen stages have INCREDIBLE efficiency. However are extremely expensive to build and maintain.
So it's going to have a niche role. It needs to be cheaper than the aforementioned system, but more efficient than screw compressors. If they can make it cheaper enough it could be revolutionary.
A helluva filter system upwind indeed..
It's pretty basic shapes that are easily turned or milled (apart from the bevel gear) so tolerances & quality control should be easy to manage in volume production so costs should be low. The problems, as you say, are in maintenance in the field. In particular, the swept area & the number of seals seems alarming.
Curious: which niches do you think this could do well in? I notice their pilot is in wastewater treatment, which seems pretty thermally stable.
@ZipperOfficial
But it already IS "revolutionary". That's how it works, it revolves...
Okay, I'll see myself out now.
The other problem that it will have is exactly the same problem they have in Wankel Rotary engines and that's sealing the corners.
This is why no matter how good of a technology other people have tried the piston in a cylinder works because its so easy to manufacture to a tolerance. Its why the invention of the V-bed lathe by Jacques de Vaucanson was so important to the industrial revolution.
YT Channel "Machine Thinking" did an incredible video on that: ruclips.net/video/djB9oK6pkbA/видео.html
Depending on the application, the roots or screw compressor sealing gap is often solved by an oil flood system that takes up the space and gets continually circulated in a loop. While this adds some complexity, it also serves to cool the pump and working medium for more stable or predictable outlet temperatures.
I was a little surprised this wasn't mentioned. For all we know the supper compressor requires oil also? I always am interested in what they don't say.
@@dickmick5517 yes absolutely... the devil is in the details.
@@dickmick5517 Go to the company page. He's not mentioning the operating pressure is 4 to 15 psi. But it is oil free, so you can use it in drinking water aeration.
4 - 15 kpa is useless for most industrial processes
@@proteinman1981 Exactly.That limiting factor should have started the conversation so we understand what we're discussing. Reach net zero? C'mon! Who are we kidding? It's psi. not kpa but still a pretty insignificant pressure.
I used to work as an inspector in the quality control department at a company that manufactured multiple sizes and grades of screw blowers, from stock engine types for offroad ATV's to the top drag racing ones that you see on those super long dragsters. They were such a pain to measure all the tolerances and such. The biggest ones had multiple profiles in their outer diameters so the clearances would change on different parts of the rotation. There were by far my least favorite parts to inspect. Super high tolerances, and very difficult to get good repeatable readings.
You should have just done what China does and mold the "QC passed" sticker into the part at the time of manufacture.
@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475as opposed to our traditional Western approach of simply offering the inspector's boss the promise of a high paying salary in 3-5 years time.
It does make me worry when the culture is basically, keep measuring until it passes.
You could have used one screw to mold, lathe or hot forge it's partner in a jig with synchronised counterotating chucks.
Or even pour garnet grit or run a sanding band along the gap. Rotational lapping.
Easy peasy problem to solve. Did you have management that tortured and terminated intelligent people in the workplace?
@@aaronfranklin324 i understand your point but then there is the gap and/or the diference of thickness of old/new belts and the "marking" in the resulting piece, also, you would need to polish it to keep it smooth, and then measure it to see if it meet the 0.005mm standarts, so...
A big, low hanging fruit in compressed air systems is setting the system up properly for the end use. Most compressed air systems are designed for a common pressure, say 125 psig, but all the plant uses are much lower. I've seen plants where the plant air system compresses air to 150 psig and the maximum usage pressure in the plant is 25 psig. Of course, you have to balance piping cost against wasted energy compressing to an excessive pressure. But the piping cost is a one time expense while the wasted energy is for the life of the plant. And, almost universally, the air is let down across a valve wasting the energy stored in the over pressure air. The same thing happens in steam systems: generate steam at 150 psig and use it at 10 psig and getting there across a PRV.
A difficult engineering concept explained so easily by Dave.
Thank You very much for keeping us updated every week.
My pleasure!
Hi Dave, compressor tech and things like motor scheduling or variable / efficiency improvements are among the great technological leaps of the 20th century, you're quite right. I'd love to see a second video answering some of the excellent comments brought up in response to this video, a deeper dive. Specifically, what are the company responses to the filtration problem / multiple seals, turbulent flow patterns and opportunities, niches they see as most useful and viable, independent test results, and market issues. Thanks for a video on one of my favourite topics.
Do you think that regular compressors are inefficient? but they can provide very high compressions in single stage operations. You think that friction (only cause of inefficiency; not counting adiabatic heat due to compression) causes more than 30% loss in total?
Presumably, it would increase round-trip efficiency on compressed air energy storage installations as well, which would be interesting.
I thought this video was going to end with that.
Irrelevant, sadly.
@@terencefield3204 not irrelevant at all. ruclips.net/video/UkY2bmBUito/видео.html
@@terencefield3204 Cause the gaping inefficiencies? I've heard the affordability of off the shelf components and renewables could make the losses viable. Would you disagree?
@@anthonydunn729 the UN map of heat equation viability across the globe is clear.A tiny shift at the margins from a technological novelty does not amount to a row of beans.The rest is hope over reality and cynical marketing to techie types.
just googled and found out that Ford, Lontra, and Ricardo got a funding from the UK TSB to make a demonstration supercharger, can’t wait to see what comes of that
Turbine manufacturers solve the precision end gap issue for turbine blades by allowing the blade ends to be abraded by the housings with the result of perfect clearance at max heat and RPM. Similar abrasive machining can bring roots type blowers into perfect clearance very cheaply.
Most screw compressors use an oil to fill the gaps between surfaces, which is filtered out of the discharge air and recycled back into the system. Seems to work just fine. Change the oil every few thousand hours and you’re good to go.
Air conditioning would benefit from this. Cooling is based on the sudden expansion of a compressed gas, this would improve the efficiency of an AC system.
"Leave no stone unturned" approach. (With an Exceptionally thorough and clear explanation of how this device works). Rethinking existing products with efficiency in mind is too often overlooked. People want "New and Wild" all the time, but this design is revolutionary too (and you can even choose your direction).
I'm a Millwright, and one of the things we learned at tradeschool was the importance of reducing air leaks wherever possible. I currently work on locomotives, and air compressors are an integral part of the vehicles functioning safely. This new design sounds like an excellent solution to the issues of both the screw and piston compressors.
Talk to whoever you need to. Get that ball rolling!
I ran a grit-blasting business for three years and lived & breathed air compressors, including a bank of 10 fridge motors to fill my receivers overnight and warm the office up ready for work!
This technology could make liquified air energy storage more viable.
It's a blower per say, not an air compressor. 15 psi max
@@Ramdodge582 it's not 15psi max. The maximum just depends on the tolerances and strength of the parts. You could build one capable of 1000psi
Late to the party here, but the sealing issues for positive displacement roots/screw type blowers have been dramatically mitigated over the last couple of decades by the use of advanced coatings on the rotor packs. These durable yet flexible coatings literally wear in to a near optimum seal upon first use. This is one of the reasons we can see compressor efficiencies on vehicle ICE superchargers in excess of 70% now (best I've seen is 74%, may be some higher). Turbos are more efficient still which is why we don't see too many OEM PD supercharged vehicles anymore, but the existing tech, at least in the automotive space, isn't nearly as bad as this video makes it sound.
Positive displacement compressors and motors are better for variable speeds. Turbines are better for fairly constant speeds, especially at higher flow rates, which is why aircraft, power plants, ships, etc. use them. The precision timing of this design would lead to a catastrophic failure if the timing mechanism wore even a little.
Ever see a rotary lobe/screw blower that has a little wear on the timing gears? Or that they were reassembled after maintenance off by one tooth on the timing gears? Can you say shrapnel?
@@michaelpatrick6950 Im quite sure that most air screw compressors only drive om one of the screws and the other follow, no need to use gears. Screw compressors are very reliable.
its like Rotary engine replacing a piston engine
@@karaffenson a contact cooled screw compressor the oil is what creates the clearance oil free units are geared.
I think you want all pumps larger, not smaller. If you make a piston pump narrow, you decrease the surface area that needs sealed, but you decrease the volume of air compressed. Volume is cubed, while surface area is squared, so the sealing efficiency goes up exponentially with size.
The one thing I'd be concerned with this new pump design, is pulsation or frequency. You'd need a flywheel to dampen it, or multiple compressor elements, since it would act like a reciprocating piston oscillating between peak torque and zero torque input every revolution.
There'd also be an issue of the chamber opening up to the discharge port, that pressurized air from whatever the discharge port was connected to would try to flow back into the chamber unless the discharge port only open once peak pressure has been realized in the chamber.
used to work with ac's and cooling machines, it is really something i remember almost being invisible when i was a kid, everyone knows there are cars and trains and power lines, but its so easy to miss all the heat pumps that are all over the place :) and compressors are not all that efficient :-) at least for non industrial applications, a lot of potential there for innovation.
@@GaryGraham-sx4pm in what way it is different from a regular rotary vacuum pump?
@@GaryGraham-sx4pm i have no idea what you even mean by that.. A vacuum pump minimizes leakage and does not maximise mechanical effichiency, and if you are one of these weirdos chasing me around the playground then you should maybe think about the implications a bit more carefully ❤️
@@monkerud2108 wtf?
I like how the design is relatively compact. This would be beneficial for automotive applications. Turbochargers are more efficient compared to screw and roots type superchargers but come with inherent flaws. It would be interesting to see this applied to get a good comparison of power and efficiency. Maybe even a compound setup to still take advantage of energy waste from exhaust.
Thinking it would work well the snow making industry.
I've just taught myself enough 3D graphics to draw my advanced, far more powerful Turbo / External Heat Engine and will publish on a youtube channel I have soon. A larger than normal exhaust turbine is backed by a sealed turbine filled with high pressure CO2, wrapped in a radial compressor, joined to the same setup on the other end by a hollow axle. Compressed CO2 expands with much force when heated. I have it pumping fuel, coolant and whatever else (ie. hydraulic fluid or second fuel type) in between, also cooling the middle of the turbo/engine.
--
It's designed to work with an internal combustion engine that shoots exhaust gas into each side alternately, with the opposite side cooled by squirting high pressure coolant at the exhaust turbine on the other side, adding steam power and amplifying heat engine power that relies on a temperature difference between ends - HOT-COLD engine... It's a condensing exhaust system so the water from the steam is reused and cooled exhaust gases expelled (or compressed into a diaphragm that expands into the fuel tank to be dumped at a gas station).
I'm reminded of a Wankel rotary engine a little. It just has two chambers instead of 3 because no combustion is needed.
Yes it does resemble a rotary engine. Maybe it could be a rotary leaf-blower :)
@@simongross3122 Or maybe a rotary supercharger for a rotary engine?
As a mechanical engineer I can see many ways why this hasn't been adopted but the major one is the geartrain needed that not only changes the direction of power by 90 degrees (huge energy waste right there) but also has to be zero backlash for millions of revolutions. A roots blower only has four points of high precision contact where this design has a dozen or so.
Please don't embarass this video maker with your ability to perform simple arithmetic :)
Welll he did say they could get the same effect in less quality parts so perhaps even tho it has more its made up by the fact the tolerances arent as high.
Absolutely brilliant. If this takes off, heat pumps are suddenly even more efficient than they currently are. Thanks Dave
I do believe you're onto something eh?!!:))
@@lawrencetaylor5407 they're the same thing
heat pumps are progressively less efficient as outside temperatures decrease, ground source negates that affect with consistent heating at just the cost of compressor energy, and the 'lontra' principle certainly improves on that equation. my two cents worth is heat-exchanged to hot water with capacity and insulation enough for a week, but with the compressor directly mechanically coupled to a wind turbine, of any type, on the expectation of wind blowing enough at least once a week, with calculated sizing to acquire winter heating at zero cost and with zero electrical and electronic gadgetry (except perhaps for over-temp shutdown).
@@GaryGraham-sx4pm that sounds very complex and inducing losses in heat storage. It seems easier to me to just store the wind energy in a battery and drive the compressor of the heatpump with that energy.
@@thotmorgana hot water insulated with sand might be more friendly than batteries and an alternator and rectifier and battery management system and inverter and motor controller and motor to get the same end result: heat storage
I find your comparison a bit misleading. This machine can produce at max 1 bar of pressure. This is more comparable to a blower than a compressor per say. For example, your figures about global compressed air energy consumption, must include at least 75% of machines running above 7 bar. So this technology technically cannot replace the whole fleet of machines (just root blowers, multi stage blowers and so on, not so much the screw and piston compressors which - I think - makes up for the bulk of the compressed air production in industry)
Hmm. Interesting. I'd like to see comparative efficiency data and pressure plots. The exhaust port and blade intersection with holes and sharp edges induces a ton of turbulence. Seems like an interesting idea, but the devil is in the details, and the details still look rough. Looks like potentially high volume but low pressure kind of design.
With an increase in the required pressure, radial loads on the rotating part with small holes will increase significantly and uneven during compression. The bearing will not be happy.
By the way, simple piston engine is way more reliable and efficient than topic`s supercharger...
Would this be good as a compressor for a refrigerator. Would help bring down the price of heat compressors.
@@grahamehadden4320 Price of heat compressors based on electric coils manufacturing. This gismo will lower electric consumption.
@@mustdie1998 have you proven that? What is the maintenance interval for the machine mentioned by the video?
I was a facility engineer in several manufacturing plant operations over the years and eventually into business. Now retired for a while but I used, and still do, believe that Compressed Air...be it plant service air, dry air or control air was the most expensive utility in the plant...
Thanks for the introduction into a new approach to shoving a large volume into a smaller space... repeat...
👍🏻👍🏻 great video. I have a bottling plant where we use screw compressors for low pressure requirements ( upto 8-10 kgs ) and reciprocating compressors for high pressure requirements ( 36-44 kgs ) which are one of our major costs. Never knew the screw compressors were thaaaat old a technology.
Thanks for the introduction to this new option. Would live more videos like that 👍🏻
Attach one to each hub of a wheel
Make pressurized air move a turbine that's connected to a generator
Each wheel contributes to the charging of the power cell
Semi trailers- average have 4 possible hubs, that only roll around now.
Make the _pulling of the trailer_ create power!
Thank you for your very clear explanation. I'm glad to see that the Lontra blade compressor is being increasingly applied to many traditional uses. At first I assumed that you would be talking about waste heat recovery from the compression process. It sounds like this compressor is most useful in applications where a compressor lubricating fluid can't be employed.
Like Oxygen lines
there seems to be a lot of seals sweeping almost every surface, I don't see it working without lubrication & exceptional air filtration.
viscosity of a hot and high pressure gas is high and they tend to leak less. This is particularly important when the engine RPM is high and the process is almost adiabatic. Multistage centrifugal compressors are not inefficient and they can run at high speed.
@@alanhat5252 multi stage axial compressors have much more sealing surfaces
The ole hyperloop of 160 years ago looks like a drawing. All we did in modern times is make it a 3D drawing. It was a vapor idea then and now.
Formula 1 engineer, Guy Niegre, developed a compressed air piston engine that can power a carbon fiber mini van 200 miles on 3x 7 foot tanks.
Angelo Di Pietro invented a smaller, more powerful compressed air rotary engine & a new compressed air tank.
The compressor featured in your video + solar electricity, combined with their engine & tank, may be the answer to zero emissions transport.
Would like to hear your thoughts on these two engineer's designs, in a future video.
There used to be "fireless" locomotives, instead of a conventional boiler, they just had a tank that received steam from a outside source, then used the steam to power the locomotives, often in paper Mills or mines where sources of ignition are problematic. This can hold more energy than compressed air.
A simple battery can store more energy than compressed air tanks.
Compressed air has a very low energy density compared to other storage devices (fuel, battery etc.)
Well he didn't. He maybe made other beleive that he developed this "snake oil" mini van. Sorry, but likelihood of that being anything but a hoax/scam is very small.
First an foremost: A compressor is a very inefficient device. Somewhere between 10-20% of the input energy is converted into compressed air, and the rest as heat, the lowest form of energy. Higher pressure =lower efficiency.
Secondly: A circular tank 3×7 feet has a volume of roughly 1,8m3. If that tank was filled with air @ 200bar(same as a divers tube) the total energy content in that tank would be 36130kJ or 10kWh. Roughly 1/20th of the capacity of a Tesla model S battery.
Third: This vehicle was driven by a piston engine power from the stored energy in the air tank. Piston engines isn't the most efficient either. Reciprocating motion involves continuous acceleration/deceleration meaning losses. I have a hard time imaging a efficiency anything above 35%. But let's say 50% for the sake of argument.
That would mean 0,2×0,5=0,1=10% efficiency of the system as a whole.
50kWh electric energy, converted into 10kWh compressed air, converted into 5kWh of mechanical work.
And he drove 200 miles =320km using only 5kWh. If we assume a speed of 100kph or 60mph he drove for roughly 3h. That indicates a mean power consumption of 5kWh/3h=1,7kW=2,3hp.
NO, NO, NO!
I am curious to know what the difference in noise level is as well. Anyone who's used a typical air compressor knows it is typically noisy and gets hot.
You can't compress air without it getting hot-basic laws.
Liquid ring compressors also leap to mind when thinking on low-leakage compressor designs. There have even been some fascinating patents utilizing them as heat engine turbines.
@Meister von Drake Not sure I can post URLs, but search for patents US9803480B2 and US9453412B2
Edit: US7681397B2 as well!
Very pleased to hear that this design is being used industrially. This is the best way to find out what the challenges of using these pumps really are. The cost of, and ease (or difficulty) of, maintenance of the seals will determine how successful the compressor will be. We'll wait to see what happens over the next five years with this product. Thanks for the video. 🙂👍
Compressed air generation is up to 40% of energy loss in pharmaceutical industry
Well, OK, but pharma is not an industry that uses a large amount of energy.
2016 was the warmest year on record. Co2 has increased every year since 2016.....hummmmmmmmmm? Well... things are a lot greener this spring so that's something.
Global greening is real. Co2 is the reason
It's amazing how they still come up with new solutions to age old problems.
No matter what its still a piston driven device but the piston in the device is just curved and essentially doing the same thing to compress the air.
That is a beautiful design. As a hobby machinist, I dream of making things like this on my home-built milling machine. :)
Do it. Screw the patents you're not selling it, use it as a benchmark to test your skills
It really depends on the product and the industry as to what provides the air for product blow lines. My experience was in the cereal business so we were transporting grain and flour. In this application, the air volume and not pressure was the most important thing so the equation was the distance of travel, type of product, feed rate of product needed, and how many bends which gave you the diameter of the pipe and required airflow which gave you the size of the blower and in our case we did not require expensive screw type blowers. In most cases, they were large volume low-pressure centrifugal blowers or sometimes the old-style roots blower. With smaller diameter transport pipes it was found that using a vacuum to provide the moving force was better as the air was not heated by the blower. The vacuum pumps were water-cooled. So maybe this is why you won't see a lot of these around yet as they will be more expensive than simple blowers. High-pressure compressed air in the factory was used for control devices and actuators which pertained mainly to machinery. So it really comes down to what pressure and volume of air an industry needs when it looks at what pressurised air units to purchase.
This is an ideal solution for medical gasses as a carefully selected metallurgy and seals for bearings would impart nothing from the compressor except pressure. 🤔
Diving air is another use where a hookah dive pump using this compressor could easily be driven electrically.
This has a tremendous amount of applications and would be ideal for plant air with an air dryer.
Great video 😀👍
"Free of ads and sponsorship messages" is an integral part of this channel, and I like that.
It sounds really weird in this particular video; the while entire thing is an ad/sponsorship message for Lontra.
I am guessing this will also work on other compressible gasses? Heat pump type stuff?
It appears that this new invention only deals with the leakage aspect of compressor inefficiency, but that isn't the only source of inefficiency in compressors.
Thermodynamically speaking, the most work-intensive way to compress a volume of gas is adiabatically, where the gas increases in temperature sharply. The least work-intensive way is isothermal compression. This compressor seems to do nothing to cool the gas during compression.
If you look at how much more work it takes to compress a gas adiabatically vs. isothermally, you'll see that this is a huge source of inefficiency.
Please share more on tech like this in the future! I've researched everything involving compressors and even follow someone whos making their own at home to power a race car with batteries attached and they've had great success with it in testing so far which is mind blowing.
If this is compressing air, this should be "out of thick air" rather than "out of thin air."
...I'll see myself out.
I'd like to see the comparison of this to a scroll compressor rather than a typical screw compressor or piston compressor.
me 2
Thank you. I was trying to think of that term, scroll compressor, during the whole video.
@@machinemaker2248 vein compressor may be pf interest too
Volkswagen has a scroll comp cascades work with mercury below zero yunis
Using a self running generator, with a kinetic design and stronger magnets, would allow us to constantly charge power walls or something else, to use in homes and businesses. Especially energy efficient 3d printed homes.😎🇺🇲. Solar homes that already have everything, would be able to easily switch over without paying very much. You'd be able to have clean energy everywhere all the time.
I love to see long established tech get un upgrade. Not all tech follows Moore's Law but that does not mean better alternatives aren't awaiting us. Thanks for making this video!
I wanna see how we can make other technologies much more user friendly and able to be used by everyone with little prior knowledge. Like a chainsaw. Its a technology that was invented in 1830, and as far as safety is concerned is still one of the most dangerous pieces of equipment we operate willy nilly. Chippers too.
Love how simplicity intelligently added to basic components is the mantra of this generation of engineers.
Provided they don’t add their feelings into the equation
I adore your episodes on new interesting technologies. Keep it up!
Thanks, will do!
I agree in general but with this particular one I would have liked to see independent testing & in-service reviews before giving it free advertising.
From the manufacturer's videos it looks like it's competing not with piston-type or Roots-type compressors but with centrifugal blowers, their videos don't show higher than 1.2 bar which is vacuum cleaner & car heater territory so it's competing with pressed sheet-metal & simple castings. Efficiency may be better than these very cheap designs but efficiency gains are to be had on centrifugal compressors too & with no added mechanical complexity, just tighter tolerances.
@@alanhat5252 great points, hope you made them on the main thread.
Erm ... this may be _interesting,_ but it's hardly new. This tech goes way back. 😆
There is less surfaces to be sealed compared to some other types of compressors, but there is the the extra complication of the 90° transmission that needs to be of very high precision in order for the seals to work fine. And for when the transmission starts to wear, the seals spaces will start to increase.
Hmm.... Is it back-driveable? Meaning, can I compress air into a storage device and later use that air to decompress and drive the motor to become a generator? Ya know, energy storage!
I don't see any reason why not.
Yes it can they are call air accumulators and they can be used to power a lot of things directly more efficiently or by generating electricity less efficient.
There is alot of applications that also use a simple piston compressor, like O2 concentrators for medical applications. They use aluminium sleeves and a sort of compound head gasket that only lasts for so long. It is loud, it vibrates and needs to be serviced alot.
I also suspect that the piston design overall uses more electricity to run because the efficiency is lower at the end points where almost no linear motion occurs.
This is a very cool piece of engineering.
And yes, corkscrew compressors or pumps are insanely expensive for what they offer because the screws and their bearings have such low tolerances across such a big surface area.
This company is going places.
I thought this was going to be another video about compressed air batteries (a very good idea) but this was genuinely interesting and new! That is a very clever design for a compressor!
It makes getting to compressed air batteries more efficient.
That squeezed is at a nice high TEMPERATURE ! also ! =
A really nice aspect of compressed air is that you can store large amounts of energy in a small space, enough to lift a submarine out of the water (been there, done that). And the compressor can be run by a windmill. Wow, no carbon footprint.
Though the containment vessel is heavy, making specific energy much lower than conventional fuels.
When you can assure me that the compressor can deliver 100-120psi pressure 24/7 for at least 80 000-100 000h lifetime with only basic service a few times a year (oil, filters and small parts replacement, 2h stop max), with more than 10% energy saving from screw compressors, then its a revolution.
Screw compressors are a refined technology and new more efficient speed controlled motors and other things make them more efficient than before. They also rely on a constant flow of oil that seals and cool the screw, then oil is separated from the air flow, really smart actually.
Got a brand new Atlas Copco GA45VSD+FF few weeks ago at work, hope its as good as our GA30VSD that have 92 000h and still works perfect.
Such a simple solution that is obvious yet I never considered doing such a thing.
Things always look obvious after someone else has figured them out. I thought this was a brilliant bit of design that was not at all obvious.
This is a fine advertisement for Lontra, but the claims of 21% and 34% of "efficiency improvement" are unsubstantiated. "Efficiency improvement" vs what, a 60 year old compressor that is under maintained and improperly sized? The geometry of this compressor does not lend its self to significant improvement over other modern designs, and seal leakage is not usually a significant loss either. Almost all efficiency gains, in terms of reduced electrical consumption, are from pipe network leak reduction, proper sizing of the compressor for the loads, control systems that can vary the compressor properly, and maintenance programs. The compressor internal seal leakage is very insignificant to overall power consumption.
I applaud Lontra for producing the compressor, but in an industry that is over 100 years old, the usual reason no one has ever made the "new" design is because it's not advantageous over existing designs.
I love when an incremental improvement like this is so effective, and you explained it elegantly.
My one question: doesn't the Lontra design introduce a pulse that the Roots design doesn't? Isn't there going to be variability in the output between the start of the cycle and the end?
They both have pulses. The continuous roots blower screw version does ~not though. Much more expensive to make and rarely done. So, if this is much cheaper to make... then yes.
Yeah, I think the output pressure would oscillate on every cycle, but that can be dealt with using some kind of pressure smoothing mechanism. One simple method would be to put a large chamber on the output of the compressor. Because the volume of the chamber is so much larger than the volume of the "piston", the effect of injecting that oscillating pressure into the chamber would have little effect on the pressure in the chamber as a whole. I'm not a mechanical engineer, though, so there are probably better and more compact methods than this.
Like the Omega-1, these tight-tolerance metal seals sound great on 3d animations or very low speeds, but those are going to leak bad at full speed. Worse yet, they will get hot and cause further tolerance issues.
Remember: Real metal seal blowers have a loooong metal seal and have limited delta-pressure
The website says "IF"... especially when it talks about savings.
This is just hype to build capital because there are already very high efficiency "low pressure" compressors such as regenerative, screw or roots blowers to use for material transport in factories.
Sure, compressors use a lot of power in industry, but not all of it is for very low pressure applications. If you compare any low pressure blower to down-regulating the 6-9 BAR produced by reciprocating compressors, the savings will be great.
I work with cryogenic instrumentation and piping which we pump down to about 10^-7 milibars. Super interested in stuff like this, hope we'll be able to intergrate it some day, allthough i'm afraid its volume/revolution isn't great enough compared to the spiral pumps we have now. Still amazing to see!
6:40 The small diameter of a bicycle tire pump is not to minimize leakage. The design is about matching the force that the average or below average person would be comfortable exerting. The length of stoke is based on the required amount of pressure needed.
That is a novel idea, loved the scale model which made it so easy to understand. If it can do what they say it can do will be useful for a lot of things.
Wish them the best of luck with it all.
Also there was a guy in Australia who built a car which looked more like the lunar lander, that ran on compressed air and used to it go back and forth to the shops, he used either solar or wind turbine to compress the air in the tanks and then used to drive around, although not big a n heavy family car it was pretty cool and he built it so he did not have to pay for fuel.
Cant remember where i saw that but thought it was pretty cool.
We hold multiple pneumatic generator patents. We use compressed air to power 5kw and 10kw generators. Patents cover: design, operation, and tank storage.
@@turbinex_generatorsWhat's you're company name. How shall I contact you for more information about your services and products?
Oh ya you mean The Di Pietro Motor, developed by the Australian company EngineAir, is a rotary engine powered by compressed air. The guy's name is Angelo Di Pietro.
Reminds me of the Astron Omega 1 engine. The intake part of the engine, that is. It's a pair of gears that counter rotate, except one has only one gear tooth while the other only has one tooth gap. The air gets trapped and compressed just like in this compressor.
In most compressors, all the final sealing requirements are ultimately met by appropriately viscous oil filling the inevitable remaining gaps between components. This design introduces all sorts of dynamically interacting seal gaps that need that oil film delivered to them and maintained. That would seem to be a huge can-o-worms for achieving maximum potential for the design. No mention of it though.☹️ (Unless I just didn’t pick up on it. That’s happened before…)
I agree. This thing is unsealed like a can of bad worms.
On Lantras web page it is presented as oil free and I agree that there is many problems not covered. Even Lantra doesn't show much on their web site.
@@blameyourself4489 if you will believe what the videos says where it is already being used effectively in some factories and sewage treatment plants, then that means they have already solved the "can of worms" that you are talking about in those applications.
@@sepg5084 It would be great if someone would explain what kind of solution is employed, in that case.
Hello. I am an energy efficiency engineer and I have been looking at air compressor and air compressor energy efficiency for around 15 year (if you want to talk industrial EE let me know :) ). There where a couple things I wanted to address after watching this video:
At a high level any time you add steps between your energy and your use you add inefficiency. Directly using an electric motor will always be more efficient that taking motor load to create some side product (in this case high pressure air) that is than used for a process. We see this same issue all the time in industry when high pressure steam is used to heat water, why make steam to than heat water when you could have just heated the water directly and used much less energy to do the same job. Compressed air is much more convenient, requires smaller tool and is greatly embedded in existing industrial technology but it is a wasteful way of getting things done.
This is because.. air compressor by design are very inefficient. About 66% of the energy in a air compressor system is used to make air hot. This is because of that pesky equation PV=NRT. Even with a air compressor that is 30% more efficient.. it would be much better to use anything other than an air compressor if you can. A 50 HP air compressor could be replaced by a 8 HP piece of equipment that could do the same job with 60-70% less energy use.
Your example at the water treatment facility may be an issue of application and not efficiency of the equipment. This application would low pressure air and not high pressure air like what would be produced by a standard air compressor. This mean that you could replace the air compressor at this site with an air blower and greatly reduce there energy use, not because the air blower is fancy technology but because you do not need high pressure air.
Lastly pneumatic transportation is a energy disaster when compared to conveyor belts. It is convenient- yes, does it use 4 times as much energy or more to do the same job-yes. You can imagine this kind of transportation as using a semi truck to pull a very small car down the road. You could use a giant fan to blow beans 100 meters away or you could just use a small motor and a belt to do the same job.
I hope this is helpful and does not come off as being a critic for critics sake. I have a huge passion for making industrial efficient but it will require more change than replacing existing inefficient processes with slightly less inefficient processes.
You're right they needed clean oil-free air, volume counts more than pressure. The webpage says the compressor is for low or high pressure applications, flow rate 350 to 1550 CFM, outlet pressure 4 to 15 PSI. Pretty much all it can do is blow clean bubbles and a bit of wind.
@@edbruder9975 15 psi is not industrial compressed air. Industrial compressed air runs in the range of 100 psi or more. This technology would not apply to the vast majority of industrial compressed air and should not be claimed as such. Pneumatic system seem to be operable at the 15 psi range but this does not account for pressure drop across distances. These systems only meet the min requirement for pneumatic systems but 100 ft is around 10 PSI drop or more for common material meaning this would not be applicable for this application for any reasonable distance.
Great video. I wonder if rotating the pump the other way would give a vacuum pump, and whether the pump can be used as a motor if you apply compressed air to the output
I work in a Natural gas power plant and we use dozens of various compressors for a multitude of tasks. This tech and others like it could greatly reduce auxiliary load on the plant
Thanks Dave - has this compressor been used with a heat pump and if so is there an improvement in the CoP?
The energy efficiency is not really about Heat pumps in its compressor. Rather the fluid, radiators. The mechanical compressor is the minority portion.
Atlas copco sweden makes already these trains used in their metal mines smart thesepoikas and flicornas cheers yunis
@@w8stral You pay for the energy the mechanical compressor uses when running a heat pump. If it's 35% less energy, it's 35% better.
@@edbruder9975 Yes/No. See above. All improvements are nice; no one will bitch about improved efficiency, but we have no idea if this version scales or its gains. It sounds like it should but it is always those nitty gritty details which screw the works up.
@@w8stral On their webpage it says it's working pressure is 4 to 15 PSI so you'd need quite a stack of them to pump much heat. They shoulda started the story with 15 PSI but net 0 draws way more viewers and comments. Like you said the devil's in the details.
A trompe is a water-powered air compressor, commonly used before the advent of the electric-powered compressor. A trompe is somewhat like an airlift pump working in reverse. Trompes were used to provide compressed air for bloomery furnaces in Catalonia and the USA.
The trompe is one of those lost technologies. Around the nineteenth century, if a mine were located near a river, they would install a trompe to use energy from the falling water to isothermally compress air.
If developed again in could be a very integral part of solving energy issues without environmental damage.
Is there any information on what system they replaced for the airation at the water treatment plant?
Water treatment plants aerate the pool in order to keep them from settling and to oxygenate the waste water.
Back in the 1960s Chrysler designed a No gas air conditioner called Rovax. Air was sucked out of the cabin and a rotary compressor to 30psi. The comppressed air passed through a common radiator which drew the heat out of it. Cooled compressed air passed through the other side of the compressor to recover some power as it was released. A filter sorted the ice out of it and 4F air went back in the cabin. 4 engineers took the Plymouth to the Ca desert where it was 104F outside. Temp in the cabin got down to 58F! No freon, no recharging, no service. They buried it and we never heard about it again....
I deeply appreciate the topics you cover and the approaches you use when covering them!!! Thank you! When I'm in a better fiscal situation, I will totally share through Patreon💜. (the road is paved with good intentions yes? 😋)
Thanks @Jonneonut I really appreciate your support:-)
My home compressor is a screw type, it uses oil to seal the rotors so that the clearances don't have to be quite so perfect. The oil is separated from the air and run through a cooler before recirculating. Some oil does escape the separator and go to the tank.
Fun fact: industrial air compressors are basically ideal for remanufacturing.
That is a brilliant bit of engineering/design work making something that complex in idea, that simple in function.
The problem with efficiencies is that companies will tend to expand their output as a result, rather than keep the output the same and thereby reduce emissions. Not that I think this compressor efficiency is a bad thing, just that I'm not sure it will result in real-world reductions in emissions.
By making more they would oversupply and put other manufacturers out or not be able to sell. Basic supply and demand.
Very interesting video. I work in Engineering, and we use compressed air regularly. In fact, some machines we use are built to use compressed air in their operation, without that air they couldn't work at all. So important has compressed air become in our day-to-day working. I hadn't realized how much power is consumed worldwide in the production of compressed air though, that was an eye opener.
Thats pretty interesting. I am interested to see it used more widely and to have its longevity tested
I'm amazed that those original Roots blowers could be machined to the accuracy needed 160 years ago.
Then, when "they" twisted the blades, holy cow! BTW, the purpose of that is to even out the air flow. The original design was very pulsed. The biggest and earliest application was pushing air through Bessemer steel converters. Those big superchargers you see on dragsters come from GM diesel engines.
I have an Eaton roots type blower on my Buick V6. 215,000 miles. Good machining!
Nice video! 2020 was a rough year for me as I lost my job as a college teacher due to the lockdown. I got introduced to Ms, Gardner, I opened up about challenges I was facing here in Norway, during my time working with her, I was able generate weekly returns on my investment in the money market. We still keep in touch, such an amazing lady.
Hi there, I had little knowledge on predicting the stock market, but with Ms. Gardner weekly analysis and advise profits are guaranteed! I received thrice my initial deposit in a week!!
I want to be financially free , I currently work 2 9-5 jobs and I’m struggling to pay bills along with my moms medical bills. I heard about forex a little while ago and was really interested and wanted to get into for the longest but I never had someone who could help. Can I get her contact? I need her assistance
@ROSEGARDNERBIS
Ms. Gardner gave me a wide option investing strategies, she introduced me to USD margin lending in which I was able to earn interest with no anticipated downside risk. She made my February a remarkable month!
If you go to the Lontra page, it states the compressor is for low and high pressure applications, flow rate 350 to 1550 CFM, and a pressure range from 4 to 15 PSI. Not like any bicycle pump I've ever used. Did I miss something here? It's being used to aerate water purification systems. It can blow bubbles to about 33' or so.
Having spent 2½ decades working in an industry that required a working air compressor for every minute the shop was running, and because of that fact, schooling myself on the workings of the different air compressors in the shop, I could see immediately how the design you're talking about would be a massive improvement as far as efficiency, necessary maintenance, and savings in energy consumption, lower downtime, and higher productivity.
This I could see and tell JUST from my self-taught understanding of the various things involved. No college kid, here. Even my kids didn't get to be college kids. How others with degrees from B.S. to M.B. that should be switching over the rest of or all of their air compressors can't see that, I can't understand. 🤷♀️
Nice video. As a mechanical engineer, I am always interested in new and clever mechanisms and machines.
I think its great we still have some people that are thinking out side the box and can come up with new ideas.
My goodness but the production values of these videos is superb...
You should consider TURBOCAM for manufacturing and wear resistant TX surface treatments.
You missed a new pump, the SCROLL PUMP. In the 1960s, when the inventer showed me his first working model at his home in Mason NH. He had made it on a modified drill press. It consists of one fixed disk with a scroll cut into it's face and another driven by an offset crank. with an inverse scroll . The scrolls were mirror identicle, each with the raised part fitting perfectly into the other ones groove. I recognised it immediatly as a truly new mechanical invention and suggested it would be a great clean vacuum pump. It had a Teflon sealing surface.
The next I knew it was being built in japan as a large compressor (that needed water cooling). But now it is in heavy use in the semiconductor processing world as a clean, (no sealing oil) vacuum pump.
The inventer Niels Young worked at Arthur D. Little Corp.
compressors definitely require a lot of power. I work in what is, all things considered, a relatively small factory and our compressors suck back about 100KW 24/7. That adds up to quite a lot of power very quickly.
As for this design, the very precise timing required between the two spinning discs gives me cause for concern as a technician. Images of the two discs violently crashing come to mind.
Elegant simplicity.
Also in case you were wondering 9:18 the software all top companies are using is called Siemens NX I suggest you learn this instead of solid works.
By having a large sealing surface, it also means that a fine precise surface would actually be less useful than a rough unpolished surface. The friction against the bypassing air would become the mechanism of sealing. A smooth surface would allow more air to bypass. *This is a rare case where cheaper might be better.*
Good job, pointing out the need to have better compressor efficiencies.
It used to really suck running airlines to a job in a high, hot and hard to reach area.
Now we take cordless tools to the job.
The savings in air related costs and total work is incredible.
Roots superchargers are used in many performance cars. I'm sure the hot rod community would love to see this technology come to superchargers.
Holy crap, stop the effing presses! It's 2023, and we're talking about a significant improvement in a physical machine. Not some arcane advance in chip design, not some new metamaterial, not something only comprehended by a handful of PhDs around the world. This is soooooo freaking cool I can't stand it! I love stuff like this!!!!!
You dont want to blow your product all over the manufacturing area for several reasons... 1st is the damage imparted onto the product being beaten inside that tube, so not all product is robust enough for such a method of movement. 2nd is static build up, plastic are notorious for building up static charge when being vacuumed and blown through transporting tubes, especially when the transportation tube are also made of plastic... I have seen a pallet box of plastic beads generate a foot long static arc because of such a problem.
Wonderful and interactive comments as usual.
Thank you for posting!