Dairy farming on the Plains: was it a big mistake?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 июн 2022
  • Mike, a long-time environmental whistleblower, tells Frank Film that it wasn’t until large scale irrigation came onto the scene in the 1990’s that Canterbury’s dry land was transformed en masse, and intensive dairy farming took off. “It couldn’t happen without irrigation,” Mike says. “There’s more more irrigation in Canterbury than the whole rest of New Zealand put together to make this landscape into a dairy farming situation.”
    He explains that around the same time there was an explosion in the use of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser, which along with irrigation, could be used to grow more grass and feed more cows. Just like the gold rushes of earlier days, when word got out, everybody wanted in. According to StatsNZ, the number of cows in Canterbury jumped from 113,000 in 1990 to 1.2 million in 2019.
    But, as Mike says, this has come with a price - intensive dairy farming is polluting our rivers and aquifers, and it’s only getting worse. He says the problem created is too big for farmers to fix on their own.
    “We have to realise we made a big mistake here, and let’s sort it out,” Mike says, and explains that the major issue with water contamination is nitrates. Cows pee - a lot, and this nitrate-rich urine combines with synthetic fertilisers to dump a whole lot of nitrogen into the soil.
    “It just goes straight down, very quickly past the root zones through those gravelly soils and into the layers and layers of aquifers that run out this way,” Mike says of the Canterbury region. He explains that high nitrate levels in rivers and aquifers are unwelcome for several reasons. For our rivers and lakes, they cause toxic algal blooms which can be harmful to plant, marine and human life.
    There’s no better example than Lake Te Waihora/Ellesmere, the catchment at the end of the Plains. It is, as Liz Brown, chair of local Te Taumutu Rūnanga describes it, the sink at the bottom of the drain. “Whatever we do upstream is going to have an impact on what eventually arrives in Waihora,” Liz tells Frank Film.
    Local Kevin Rouse, who lives on the lakeshore, recalls catching thirty flounders a day thirty years ago - now, he’s lucky to get one.
    There is also growing concern about the effects of high nitrate levels in drinking water. While New Zealand regulations are 11.3mg/L, a 2018 Danish study found that anything over 1mg/L may be linked with an increased risk of bowel cancer.
    Iain Piper of Leeston has been testing his own well out of concern for his family. After his first well tested at around 17mg/L, he had a deeper well drilled, which tested around 11mg/L. Now, $17,000 later, the family uses a reverse osmosis machine to filter their water, which still sits at around 4mg/L.
    Mike says the evidence is clear: if we want safe drinking water, we have to reduce farming intensity on the Canterbury plains by 12 to 24 fold. Environment Canterbury councillor Lan Pham is pushing for change with the same urgency. She tells Frank Film that farmers have been hit with regulations to try to curb nitrate levels, but the changes constitute a drop in the ocean.
    “All that tells me is that we are polluting a little bit less. It doesn’t tell me that we’re actually moving the dial in terms of the magnitude of change required to actually have a functional environment,” Lan says.
    Mike has a solution, one which has been applied in the North Island to save lakes Taupo and Rotorua, and one which doesn’t put the onus on farmers to fix the problem. It involves central government paying farmers to deintensify or transition from dairy.
    “It’s not the farmer’s fault,” Mike says. “They’re just doing what they can to stay in business. The change has to be enabled. We have to be able to help farmers get out of the trap that they’re in at the moment.”
    John Sunckel, Leeston dairy farmer and Environment Canterbury councillor, tells Frank Film that farmers can’t be expected to give up their businesses without some kind of certainty for the future. “What are you asking me to change to?” he says. “What will you give up? Will you give up your house, your car, your retirement fund, your super fund, everything that you own and have strived for, your retirement and walk away from that?”
    But with central government support, John says he’d consider the idea more seriously. “If the government or the people of New Zealand believe that is what they want, then pay me out, and I’ll walk away. But in the interim, don’t just tell me I need to cut cows or do something different, when I have no pathway,” he says.
    Lan wants action from the top. “I would love to see central government actually seizing the power that they hold to shift this dial much further and faster.” she says. So could the answer be to pay farmers to stop intensive farming?
    Producer/Director: Gerard Smyth
    Editor: Oliver Dawe
    Story Producer: Georgia Merton
    Production Manager: Jo Ffitch
    Sound Mix: Chris Sinclair
    Production Asst: Romah Chorley
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 13

  • @GeoffReidNZ
    @GeoffReidNZ Год назад +9

    Well made informative video.
    Hard to get head around why we should pay the farmers not to pollute...
    and why it's not their fault they're in this mess cause they followed market trends.
    We have known since the 90's dirty dairy campaign the impacts this would have on Canterbury.
    Any other industry that pollutes people, wildlife and our environment get told to sort it out.. its "sort it out or tough luck and go out of business".

  • @petergalbraith128
    @petergalbraith128 Год назад +5

    “Why can’t we have our cake and eat it too”
    John, I think that’s your problem summed up perfectly

  • @douglaseaston1650
    @douglaseaston1650 Год назад +5

    If all the greedy council think like john sunckell this problem isn't going anywhere in a hurry

  • @andyandncky
    @andyandncky Год назад +3

    the problem started with the formation of Fonterra as part of this the dairy company had to accept milk supply from all and sundry this opened up the flood gates to land not considered suitable not only Canterbury but also central north island this caused a three fold problem Fonterra had to expand its processing to cope sell all extra to china and so we built new zealands problem polluted ground water , over capitalized dairy company selling to a mostly single market thanks helen clark

  • @lesmondk3376
    @lesmondk3376 Год назад

    Not sure why he added palm kernel in the mix

  • @raukawaknight4586
    @raukawaknight4586 Год назад +1

    I fell for the guy in dunsandle that forked out heels trying to give his kids the best opportunity at a healthy life. And after all that investment it's still a "fingers crossed" situation

  • @raukawaknight4586
    @raukawaknight4586 Год назад +6

    John sunckell asked the question "would u give up your house, your car, your retirement fund.....". I say to him Maori did give up the house the car the retirement fund the LAND and this is how you choose to use it. From a Maori point of view this suxs

  • @reyazansari7158
    @reyazansari7158 Год назад

    Hello

  • @mrsANGRYh
    @mrsANGRYh 9 месяцев назад

    Intensive dairy has wrecked havoc, next up will be intensive forestry destroying our environment.