Differential Equation - 2nd Order (54 of 84) Method of Variation of Parameters: Ex. 1
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 янв 2017
- Visit ilectureonline.com for more math and science lectures!
In this video I will use the method of variation of parameters to find y(t)=?, of y”-5y'+4y=e^(3t).
Next video in this series can be seen at:
• Differential Equation ...
This is the best explanation of variation of parameters ever!
Thank you. Glad you found our videos. 🙂
Paid $4500 for this required differential equations course and this free lecture on youtube is miles better than the professor teaching it who I can barely understand because he is bad at English
Glad you found our videos. 🙂
Same
It refresh my memory. You are best profesor.
Cursive is on point. Love this professor
Mr van Biezen you are the best thank you so much so amazing keep up the good work
You are very underrated. More students should know about you!
RUclips algorithms seem to keep our exposure down. We are relying on students telling others.
just one sentence for you, u r the most amazing professor.i just wonder where he does teach?
Pretty sure you just saved my exam score so thank you 🙏
Happy to help! Good luck on your exam!
Same!
شكرا ❤ هذا ساعدني كثيرا كتبت باللغة العربية لتعلم اننا نشاهدك من كل ارجاء العالم
Thank you. We appreciate the comment! 🙂
This was the best way to explain variation of parameters THANKYOUUU!!
Glad you liked it! 🙂
Saved my night! thank you so much :)
Thank you sooooo much your video is the best on all of RUclips for this topic!
You are welcome. Glad you found our videos.
thanks for the video prof! Really love it and easy for me to understand T_T. never thought that variation parameters will be this easy
As a student I always found that they made these topics too difficult to understand.
Thank you, I take me one hour after lecture but still don't understand. This 10-minute video save me
Glad you found our videos. 🙂
came in clutch for our final diff eq project. thank u good sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
You are welcome. Good luck on your project.
Thank you so much
Issue:
What is a differential of an irrational argument?
Let a= some rational approximation, and A be the irrational number itself (if that makes sense).
Then A - a > dA and there is no way a + dA > A
I hope good things come your way, you are amazing
Good things come to us when we have the right frame of mind. A lessons I am still trying to learn. Thank you.
Sir. Your handwriting is impeccable!🤩 (also, great explanation and bowtie)
He just helped me before an exam
@@twssafaris Me too! I was working on a midterm!
Thank you! 😃
I wish I had you as a teacher, now after an all nighter before my exam I pray this is enough to survive
Better dring some coffee before the test. 🙂
@@MichelvanBiezen right on, had it an hour ago and my test is in 20 minutes
All the best on your test.
I really hope you are well at probably 5:27 for U2 why did why did you multiply -1/3 by 1/2? If it is a law of in intergration of natural logs may you state so and thank you so much for this video
Helped me a lot God bless you 🙏
Thank you. God bless you as well.
Great video sir. Thank you
You are welcome. Glad you found our videos.
What happens in the event the r equation is a square function and ultimately the Wronskian is equal to zero?
Better late than never. When you have repeated roots, one of the solution will be exp(r*t) and the other one texp(r*t). Those two solutions are linearly independant. The Wronskian starts to be ugly, but not 0.
Would the answer change if the order in which you set up the wronskians changed?
It should be the same.
Michel van Biezen you're right. I just tried it out. Thanks
Michel van Biezen Do you have variations of parameters for first order non homogeneous in matrix form?
NEVER STOP
We don't know what the future holds, but we are still going.....🙂
this guys goated
Glad you like the videos.
You should have gone through how you do creamers rule
Gonna leave a comment here, lemme see, if my classmates come here to learn, because our prof gave activity without even single discussion
That is too bad. I remember as a student having to face the same frustration.
thank you so much sir
Glad you found it helpful. 🙂
U1 is not positive because the negatives cancel each other ???
ty
I saw same mistake.
It's still negative due to the integral of (e^4t divided by e^5t)
Thank you
You're welcome
Dear Professor. Do I need to take the absolute value for the Wronskian? I wrote e^x as my y1 and e^4x as my y2, hence the determinant was different, and I got a value of 3e^5x for the Wronskian. Is there a golden rule for this?
me too
@@simegnewtesfaye4455 I hope one day we find the answer, friend
Im also wondering the same thing :)
sir i have final exam tomorrow. i hoped you could complete the serie but...
Why the same c for u1 and u2
They are combined into a single constant at the end when added.
Thank you so much professor , this was the best ever explanation for the variation of parameters🤍♥️
You are welcome! Glad you liked it.
I LOVE YOU
Thank you. Glad you like our videos! 🙂
Cool! 😂
Thanks
Real G
Glad you liked the video. 🙂
way to get y1 prime
Glad you like it.