The Prisoner (2009) Trailer
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 мар 2014
- Starring Ian McKellen, James Caviezel, Hayley Atwell, Ruth Wilson, Lennie James, Rachael Blake, Jamie Campbell Bower and directed by Nick Hurran.
www.imdb.com/title/tt1043714/
I'm looking for trailer projects: www.seansiegfried.com/ 
Кино
James Caviezel is highly underrated actor love his stuff.
Before he was recruited by Finch he was employed by Magneto. 😉
Magneto is a comic book villian wtf are you talking about?@@55Quirll
Redoing this is like redoing Citizen Cane. The 'attempt' at redoing Psycho should tip off producers that some things are better left unattempted.
Except by me:
No.6: I am not a number, I am a free man!
No.2: We need information
No.6: What information?
No.2: We need to know why you retired
No.6: Oh, well, I'm getting on in years and bought a nice piece of property in San Juan and thought I'd settle down.
No.2: Oh, well that seems reasonable, right, off you go then.
Like Caviezel and McKellen, but the series did not need a remake. Original is a classic and still very timely.
Right. Like The Italian Job. There's nothing that can be improved.
It works like a myth, it can be reimagined over and over again.
@@Pygargue134 as long as it’s not a crappy remake which most are these days.
Think on this... McGoohan a strong Catholic -- who refused to act in projects with gratuitous sex or violence (turned down 007) -- made The Prisoner. Caviezel a strong Catholic -- who refuses to act in projects with gratuitous sex or violence -- made The Prisoner... and then went on to make the tv show Person of Interest about AI, government control, surveillance and privacy. Sounds like a McGoohan project doesn't it? Interesting...
@@kaipacifica1289 hmmmm....
I love how people didnt understand the series shit on it constantly. As a fan of the original, I also enjoyed this different take on the series. Watch it again with a different mindset and you might end up enjoying it.
Well, it's hard to remake a cult classic. Not everything in the remake worked, but it was well-made, well-acted, and still had many resonating philosophical questions. It's not McGoohan's The Prisoner, but it's still highly worth a watch... and, Caviezel is good as always! Finishing Person of Interest and Jim is top notch.
Am I only one who finds this really interesting? Going to watch it soon.
I thought it was quite good
I loved the original british one
Watch the original British series. This is made by people to utterly failed to understand their source material.
@@Zomfoo I’d say that, if you have, like me, only watched the original British series and this trailer, it is difficult to think this doesn’t understand the spirit of the series. May be I’m wrong and the movie is not what it seems, but the trailer is not bad at all
Not that we have to compare the two.
The year is 2024, *Nolan* just dominated at the Oscars with 7 awards for Oppenheimer (including Best Movie of the Year) and his next project is the remake of this screenplay (which is also a remake... Inception at its best 😅). This is going to be *wild* 🔥 !!!!!!
there's no suggestion he's remaking the remake lol.
I remember watching this as a kid but Really enjoying the classic 60’s one with Patrick
Well, this was an intriguing idea, but seriously, when did it become such a challenge to come up with our own _ideas?_
The version that came on the air in 1967 was not a _reboot._ The version of _Citizen Kane_ that came out in 1941 was not a _reboot._ The version of _Psycho_ that came out in 1960 was not a _reboot._
The people who wrote each of these classics were absolutely _original._ That's why they made history.
I mean Psycho was based on a novel, though I think adaptation can be valuable sometimes
@@jakeshulman7615 The Manchurian Candidate, the 7 Samurai to name a few others.
The 60s series is the absolute mainstay, but I have to admit this was a compelling presentation. I enjoyed it.
A limited series was perfect for telling a satisfying story but keeping the frustratingly great ambiguity of the original, which I finally got to see. More a reboot than a remake.
Six hours of my life I will never get back. Could have been done in two without four hours of filler.
From what I can tell, the message of this "Prisoner" is completely opposite the original.
I can see one of the Nolan bros tacking this with a better version.
I saw this remake, and was not happy with it. The original is still the best!
I waited 40 years for this eagerley anticipating a return to the village for pehaps some sort of closure , some sort of explanation, a reason maybe to go on living but what was served up here was the film equivalent of inferior slop. No wonder McGoohan wanted nothing to do with it .
Oh, this is going to stink SOOOO BADDD
How did that turn out?
lol
Had this been the original, then it just might have worked. But it wasn't and it flopped. Why do they try to remake established classics, with the belief that they can be improved upon ?
It’s not about improvement but remaking/reinventing
Disagree with you totally. The idea behind a remake is to go one better, this one failed on every count. You are entitled to your own opinion, as I am entitled to mine. It would appear that we have to agree to differ on this one:
@@TheQ-Continuum Absolutely not. I haven’t even given any opinion on the quality of the remake. You shouldn’t assume what I think of the remake. I’ve just told you that a remake is not suppose to be an improvement, it’s suppose to be another vision, which can be very close to the first one, but artistic reasons related to remaking aren’t just improving.
Easy example : all of the super heroes remake movies try to be different from one another. The Batman personality will change from one account to another. Exactly like the Arthurian legends. It’s not about being necessarily better than a previous masterpiece, if they could do as good as the last one, it would be enough for them
@@Pygargue134 You don't get it do you? I give up and am not going to waste any more time on you !
@@TheQ-Continuum I don’t care if « that one failed » or not, remake is not necessarily to improve. You’re triggered for a simple discussion, mate
BCN Ya 👌🏽
The trailer excited me enough to watch the show. Watching the show made me want those wasted hours of my life back.
His shouting of i am not a number is absolutely pathetic.
Truly, utterly, straight to video dreadful.
It's not at all the spirit of the prisoner's series the original. Patrick Mac Goohan would see that and laugh about it. This is where we see that the original author had talent.
McGoohan was almost part of it, he wanted to play Number Two.
No! He wanted no part of it! He had written his own follow up.@@DarthRushy
@@martinreynolds1 What follow up
How did they screw this up?
Answer: calling him "Six" instead of "Number Six". Literally Day 1 stuff.
I have the real series ai dont need this crappy remake. The original doesn't pretend there is nothing apart from The Village, although they do try other mind games like makiing him think he's a sheriff in an American western town. And they let him "escape" to the real world once as a mockery of a birthday present, before dragging him back. The Number 2s keep leaving, though its likely they were killed for failing to break "Number Six" who many people thought was John Drake from Danger Man (Secret Agent in US) though Patrick McGoohan who played John Drake and who created The Prisoner and played Number Six denied it. The whole thing came about because he was tired of Danger Man in fact.
This is just another awful american deformation of an originally good story.
Ian McKellan's not English suddenly? You could tell producer Trevor Hopkins (b. South Yorkshire), only he's dead. The music's by Rupert Gregson-Williams (out of St. John's College, Cambridge), so perhaps if you tell him McKellan's not English (or perhaps English ENOUGH) your story will be known. Good luck.
@@poptigre I could live with explosions and drama. It's the void at the center (i.e., #6 himself) that's the problem. Like re-working Hamlet minus the central character. That's the problem, not added bells and whistles.
@Adelaine Delabin I'd leave the word "yo" out of discussions of any kind with anyone over the age of 11 were I you.
really? the acting and visuals are quite out of date. tough to sit through having never watched it. much preferring the 2009 version so far
Non! Cette nouvelle série a sa dignité, sa crédibilité et respecte celle initiale. Il est dommage qu'elle n'ait pas eu une assurance budgétaire lui permettant d'inscrire un véritable cheminement; Les créateurs se sont donc contentés de lancer quelques trames intéressantes sans vraiment les développer
6ordan kurtulacak ben izledim
What was that other Jim movie where he was trapped in a town
Ik one the actors
A little Crap
1/10
Hot hot hot hot v v hot lol 🔥🔥🔥
This was a very disappointing remake. It had some interesting ideas but to call itself "The Prisoner" is an insult to the classic show.
Geez! I hated this remake.
One load of tripe. Even if they'd of filmed it in its original setting of Port Merion it would've still been awful. No wonder Patrick McGoohan refused to release the rights of this series while he was alive.
The original was great this was not worth watching poor rubbish 🤢
The original was good up until the ending which was rubbish.
what was original one of this series?
@@cuneytpim ruclips.net/video/osNmf_zmSyE/видео.html
@@cuneytpim The original British tv series from the 60s call The Prisoner.
The end is certainly challenging, but it’s not incongruous with the series. It just dials the weirdness up to maximum. There is sense in it if you dissect the meaning. If you just watch The Prisoner on the mystery adventure level, I can see how you’d not like the ending.
The finale was so bad, McGoohan had to go into hiding out of fear of the fans lynching him. True story
A big pile of Shite and not a patch on the original with Pat Mcgoohan!
Absolute Shite. McGoohan is No6
A waste of talent. Absolute an awful remake
At least it wasn't woke.
Gay