Surah Ar-Rum 21 - الرُّوم ( Another of His signs is that He created spouses from among yourselves for you to live with in tranquillity: He ordained love and kindness between you. There truly are signs in this for those who reflect. ) وَمِنۡ ءَايَٰتِهِۦٓ أَنۡ خَلَقَ لَكُم مِّنۡ أَنفُسِكُمۡ أَزۡوَٰجٗا لِّتَسۡكُنُوٓاْ إِلَيۡهَا وَجَعَلَ بَيۡنَكُم مَّوَدَّةٗ وَرَحۡمَةًۚ إِنَّ فِي ذَٰلِكَ لَأٓيَٰتٖ لِّقَوۡمٖ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ
I don't know why sunni / shia debates always revolve around muawiya, umar, abu bakr, hasan, hussain and ali (ra). Whoever was the leader in the past can't be changed. Who should have been the leader cant be changed. You cant follow either (except prophet Muhammed pbuh through sunnah etc). The main issue that should always be discussed is the beliefs / traditions. Who / what is right?? Is it right to beat yourself? Is it right to believe in a certain number of imaams who speak to God? Is there the mahdi in a cave? Questions like these are what matter and are the real crucial part of the sunni / shia divide.
@@az6802 Yes of course, but he hasn't appeared and we know the events that will lead to his appearance. There is nothing to discuss. We should be concerned with our ibadah, and if we are following the Quran and sunnah. The true believer will say the following: And those who come after them will pray, “Our Lord! Forgive us and our fellow believers who preceded us in faith, and do not allow bitterness into our hearts towards those who believe. Our Lord! Indeed, You are Ever Gracious, Most Merciful.” The Noble Quran - 59:10 We should ask Allah to forgive those who came before us. The Muhajiroon and Ansar are the most beloved of the believers. They are the ones who learned the deen, taught the deen and inherited the mission of Our Beloved Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Nobody is free from making mistakes, and Allah is The Most Forgiving. We are made weak, and we all make mistakes we wish Allah to hide. So be merciful with one another and pray Allah forgives those before you so he will also have The Mercy to forgive you.
It's embarrassing listening to Shia try to debate Adnan when they have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. Don't try to debate Adnan without bringing evidence and proofs of your claims. Adnan will just make you look like a fool and educate you.
And Adnan is also feeling proud by debating non scholar Shias on road when he cannot come against our scholars and then when we will show evidences and make all claims as flaws then he will not get recognition
The shia brothers should avoid debating all together if they are not prepared to have these difficult conversations with Sunni's, they just make themselves and all Shia look bad, bring a person of knowledge to speakers corner and let him debate
@@EzziiG if you want to just win debate out of something it's a another part but if sincerely want to prove or understand another is different that's why the questioner who wants to justify his replies has to go to the scholars who are on the same level not standing on the road and telling generally whatever he thinks as it makes the situation that the person tries to answer him out of his faithy emotions which I think every human being has . And if you see the pattern of how that Sunni guy is opposing him by not letting him finish nor letting him answer properly and making him see like an outsider in front of all that which making the person so under confident in speaking with him or else I think a scholar from our Shia sect or any person with can also debate with him if he tries to understand and speak ethically on the grounds and not just for public recognition If you try to understand what I want to convey you will definitely agree with me
@1:19:30 linguistically, the wives are "ahlul bayt" (people of that house). However, when the prophet (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh) clarifies the terminology "Ahlul Bayt" he (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh) uses a specific terminology called "ittrati" (progeny/descendents), and this is demonstrated in the well known narration about the green cloak.
Some sunni people say that this is relating to the quranic verse where the ahlul bayt is the wives. And are purified. Then the prophet did the cloak hadith event to include the likes of ali hassan ect
@CkametThon Umar was accepted by the people as well.... Umar did not change the shora in kingdom as Muawia did... and muslims are still paying the price because corrupted kingdom families came to power son after father..
@@Logia1978 1. a leader can be appointed by multiple means, one of them is appointment by a previous leader What Muawiya did in itself is not wrong 2. No one called it Kingdom, Muawiya didnt call him self king nor his son Saudis call themselves Mamlaka Arabiyeti Seudiyeh, Jordanians Mamlakah Hashimiyati Urduniyah etc etc
Nothing wrong with a kingdom. David and Sulaiman (as) were kings . When bani israil asked their prophet Samuel (as) to ask God for a king, God appointed Talut to be the king over them.
@1:12:00 pertaining to the wording of the hadith thaqalain; "itrati" meaning, progeny. are the wives of the prophet (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh), his progeny? obviously not, because you cannot be legally married to your progeny. "itra" is specifically referring to the five family members that the prophet (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh) wrapped in a big green cloak (including himself) then said; "this is my ahlul bayt."
When Al-Hasan bin `Ali moved with army units against Muawiya, `Amr bin AL-As said to Muawiya, "I see an army that will not retreat unless and until the opposing army retreats." - Sahih al-Bukhari 7109
@1:13:15 sooneys always expose their own falsehood when they try to argue against the truth. earlier in the above video monologue of adnan rashid, he used an example from the Qur'an about the story of Nūh, that when Nūh said out of concern "my son" and then it was said to Nūh 'he aint from you any longer' (meaning the family bond was detached from not only the son but also the wife). If that is case with Nūh, then why does not adnan rashid apply that same principle, when speaking about ALLāh's most beloved people, the Ahlul Kisā' (aLayhimussaLām)?
Muaviya fought two battles with ruling Khalifa and is responsible for all blood shed. No one before him fought ruling Khalifa to get the power. Muaviya forced ruling Khalifa to get the bayah, no one before him forced a ruling Khalifa to get into power. Muaviya and Yazid both forced people to get the bayah and resulted in incidents like Karbala and Harra. Muaviyah and Yazid were responsible for all fitnas. May Allah curse them and people who follow them till eternity.
Nobody can force Bayah, just like nobody can force the Shahada. Muawiyah (ra) fought Ali (ra) over finding the killers of Uthman (ra). Ali (ra) gave himself Khilafa when Uthman (ra) died. Muawiya done Ijtihad and came to the wrong judgement. Ali (ra) did not have any grudges against muawiyah (ra) over the battle of siffin. You will not find one narration even in Shia sources showing this. Muawiya did not make himself Khalifa, the people who supported him elected him. You cannot make yourself Khalifa without the support of the people. May Allah curse anyone who curses Muawiya (ra) and curses anyone of the muhajiroon and ansar.
Brother Rashid, what happened to you? Can you please explain how Allah in the holy Quran mentioned the treaty of hudaybiya as a great victory? How would you qualify Allah as you try to Qualify Hassan a.s in the eyes of Shia? You should be ashamed of yourself. The more knowledge you hold, the more responsibility and Allah knows best.
will be responsible for it for you." So, Al-Hasan concluded a peace treaty with Muawiya. Al-Hasan (Al-Basri) said: I heard Abu Bakr saying, "I saw Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) on the pulpit and Al-Hasan bin `Ali was by his side. The Prophet (ﷺ) was looking once at the people and once at Al-Hasan bin `Ali saying, 'This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e. a noble) and may Allah make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him." Bukhari 2704
Hassan (r.a) gave leadership to Muawiya (r.a) resulting in all muslims being subjected to muawiya leadership, hows that only peace treaty but not oath? literally all muslims are now under the leadership of muawiya. did prophet gave leadership of medina to kuffar in his peace treaty?? you rawafid are just deaf, dumb & blind
@@virtualwanderer Ask yourself, why is there a need for a “peace” treaty in the first place? And as we know Muwaiyya started the custom of Kingdom and the downfall and degeneration of Islam. What does that tell you about his motives?
@@virtualwanderer You are telling me that killing the grandson of the prophet is something great? Or pillaging Mecca, raping their woman and attacking the Kaaba is something great? To your standards the Roman and Mongol empires were also great. What does that have anything to do with upholding the values of Islam?
Like it or not, Muawiyah is the first Islamic ruler for which there is any evidence whatsoever. All of the stories about Muhammad, his companions, and the Rashidun caliphates were composed much later by the Abbasid caliphate, who did their best to discredit their Umayyad predecessors. Many parts of the Quran are old, even older than supposed Muhammad, but almost all of the rest of Islam got inventes centuries later and the story got filled in later. We need some real archeological research into the true origins of Islam and who was Muawiyah really.
"All of the stories about Muhammad, his companions, and the Rashidun caliphates were composed much later by the Abbasid caliphate" A big conspiracy theory, no historian whould disagree Abu Bakr or Umar etc, were real or that ruled "almost all of the rest of Islam got inventes centuries later " - Not possible we have entire quran from 1 century hijra in manuscript,# we have hadith and sira literature under ummayads in the 700 up till 750 when abbasids come
Adnan should stop calling the specific people Khawarij, its a false presumption Calling someone khariji without proof is ridiculous To do that u have to take from what they say and link it with the khariji theology which is a stretch
It is Kharaji theology when you make takfir on those whom Allah has praised or given the title of a believer. The Muhajiroon and Ansar have been praised by Allah and specifically Muawiya (ra) has been praised by The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him). ======================================================== حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ مَهْدِيٍّ ، عَنْ مُعَاوِيَةَ يَعْنِي ابْنَ صَالِحٍ ، عَنْ يُونُسَ بْنِ سَيْفٍ ، عَنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ زِيَادٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي رُهْمٍ ، عَنِ الْعِرْبَاضِ بْنِ سَارِيَةَ السُّلَمِيِّ ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَهُوَ يَدْعُو إِلَى السَّحُورِ فِي شَهْرِ رَمَضَانَ: " هَلُمَّ إِلَى الْغِذَاءِ الْمُبَارَكِ" . ثُمَّ سَمِعْتُهُ ثُمَّ سَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ: " اللَّهُمَّ عَلِّمْ مُعَاوِيَةَ الْكِتَابَ، وَالْحِسَابَ، وَقِهِ الْعَذَابَ" . Abdur-Rahman ibn Mahdi narrated to us, on the authority of Mu’awiyah, meaning ibn Salih, on the authority of Yunus ibn Sayf, on the authority of Al-Harith ibn Ziyad, on the authority of Abu Ruhm, on the authority of Al-Irbad ibn Sariyah Al-Sulami, who said: I heard the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, calling people to the pre-dawn meal in the month of Ramadan: “Come to the blessed lunch.” Then I heard him, then I heard him say: “O God, teach Muawiyah the Book and the arithmetic, and protect him from the punishment.” Musnad Ahmad, Vol. 27, Page 383, Hadith 17152 Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah, Vol. 3, Page 214 Siyar A'laam al-Nubala, Vol. 8, Page 38 Sahih Ibn Hibban, Vol. 16, Page 191 =============================================================================== the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition." Sahih al-Bukhari 2924
Imam hasan never gave bayyat to muawiya never took any stiphen never called him ameerilmomineen , it was just a peace treaty for not killings of muslims between muslims And if you want to yruly know do debate with our respected scholars and not some normal people on the road and insult shias as barking
The brothers have put out many challenges to the shia, without response (or skewered responses). One thing though, whoever was or wasn't the leader doesn't change anything. I can say, sure, Hasan & Hussain (ra) should have been /remained Caliph at their times. I love them and would have loved to even be in their presence (also the prophet Muhammed pbuh and sahaba (ra)) How does that change anything today or prove the belief of sunni / shia today?? It's a good thing to discuss for historical purposes, but it doesn't change anything today. The real issue to discuss is the beliefs of sunni and shia. Where do we get our beliefs and traditions from and what proof we have to support it.
Hassan (r.a) gave leadership to Muawiya (r.a) resulting in all muslims being subjected to Muawiya leadership, Hows that only Peace Treaty but not oath? Literally All Muslims are now under the leadership of Muawiya. Did Prophet gave leadership of Medina to kuffar in his peace treaty?? You Rawafid are just Deaf, Dumb & Blind
Hassan (r.a) gave leadership to Muawiya (r.a) resulting in all muslims being subjected to Muawiya leadership, Hows that only Peace Treaty but not oath? Literally All Muslims are now under the leadership of Muawiya. Did Prophet gave leadership of Medina to k.uffar in his peace treaty?? You Rawafi.d are just D.eaf, D.umb & Bl.ind
@NoNo-ci2el even their own sources have narrations of the bayah. They try to reject it by saying "he was doing taqiyyah to unite the Muslims but he never believed in it". Anyone who believes the Ahlul Bayt would take an oath in public whilst not believing it does not love them nor our beloved prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). They would rather be killed than do such a disgusting act.
I have been doing ruqyya on shia for long time 😂😂
This kills every thing 😅
Alhamdulillah. Very clear view of History.
⭐️⭐️⭐️Adnan Rashid⭐️⭐️⭐️
Surah Ar-Rum 21 - الرُّوم
( Another of His signs is that He created spouses from among yourselves for you to live with in tranquillity: He ordained love and kindness between you. There truly are signs in this for those who reflect. )
وَمِنۡ ءَايَٰتِهِۦٓ أَنۡ خَلَقَ لَكُم مِّنۡ أَنفُسِكُمۡ أَزۡوَٰجٗا لِّتَسۡكُنُوٓاْ إِلَيۡهَا وَجَعَلَ بَيۡنَكُم مَّوَدَّةٗ وَرَحۡمَةًۚ إِنَّ فِي ذَٰلِكَ لَأٓيَٰتٖ لِّقَوۡمٖ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ
I don't know why sunni / shia debates always revolve around muawiya, umar, abu bakr, hasan, hussain and ali (ra). Whoever was the leader in the past can't be changed. Who should have been the leader cant be changed. You cant follow either (except prophet Muhammed pbuh through sunnah etc). The main issue that should always be discussed is the beliefs / traditions. Who / what is right?? Is it right to beat yourself? Is it right to believe in a certain number of imaams who speak to God? Is there the mahdi in a cave? Questions like these are what matter and are the real crucial part of the sunni / shia divide.
Sunni also believe in Al-Mehdi…
@@az6802 Yes of course, but he hasn't appeared and we know the events that will lead to his appearance. There is nothing to discuss. We should be concerned with our ibadah, and if we are following the Quran and sunnah.
The true believer will say the following:
And those who come after them will pray, “Our Lord! Forgive us and our fellow believers who preceded us in faith, and do not allow bitterness into our hearts towards those who believe. Our Lord! Indeed, You are Ever Gracious, Most Merciful.” The Noble Quran - 59:10
We should ask Allah to forgive those who came before us. The Muhajiroon and Ansar are the most beloved of the believers. They are the ones who learned the deen, taught the deen and inherited the mission of Our Beloved Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). Nobody is free from making mistakes, and Allah is The Most Forgiving. We are made weak, and we all make mistakes we wish Allah to hide. So be merciful with one another and pray Allah forgives those before you so he will also have The Mercy to forgive you.
@@jimfromwakanda7991
Because of epistemology. You get your knowledge about the prophet saws from the enemies of Ali ibn abu talib.
@@Ali_0hYou are enemy of Hazrat Ali R.A yourself
It's embarrassing listening to Shia try to debate Adnan when they have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. Don't try to debate Adnan without bringing evidence and proofs of your claims. Adnan will just make you look like a fool and educate you.
And Adnan is also feeling proud by debating non scholar Shias on road when he cannot come against our scholars and then when we will show evidences and make all claims as flaws then he will not get recognition
The shia brothers should avoid debating all together if they are not prepared to have these difficult conversations with Sunni's, they just make themselves and all Shia look bad, bring a person of knowledge to speakers corner and let him debate
@@EzziiG if you want to just win debate out of something it's a another part but if sincerely want to prove or understand another is different that's why the questioner who wants to justify his replies has to go to the scholars who are on the same level not standing on the road and telling generally whatever he thinks as it makes the situation that the person tries to answer him out of his faithy emotions which I think every human being has . And if you see the pattern of how that Sunni guy is opposing him by not letting him finish nor letting him answer properly and making him see like an outsider in front of all that which making the person so under confident in speaking with him or else I think a scholar from our Shia sect or any person with can also debate with him if he tries to understand and speak ethically on the grounds and not just for public recognition
If you try to understand what I want to convey you will definitely agree with me
Please shias who want to follow truth... open your hearts...
Respect all wives and companions of prophet of God peace and blessings be upon them
@1:19:30
linguistically, the wives are "ahlul bayt" (people of that house).
However, when the prophet (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh) clarifies the terminology "Ahlul Bayt" he (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh) uses a specific terminology called "ittrati" (progeny/descendents), and this is demonstrated in the well known narration about the green cloak.
Some sunni people say that this is relating to the quranic verse where the ahlul bayt is the wives. And are purified. Then the prophet did the cloak hadith event to include the likes of ali hassan ect
What was the name of the book adnan said to get?
The problem with Moawiah is that he changed the shora elected khalif to a kingdom...
No he didnt, Abu Bakr chose without shura Umar, in itslelf its not a problem
He didnt call himself a king
@CkametThon
Umar was accepted by the people as well....
Umar did not change the shora in kingdom as Muawia did... and muslims are still paying the price because corrupted kingdom families came to power son after father..
@@Logia1978
1. a leader can be appointed by multiple means, one of them is appointment by a previous leader
What Muawiya did in itself is not wrong
2. No one called it Kingdom, Muawiya didnt call him self king nor his son
Saudis call themselves Mamlaka Arabiyeti Seudiyeh, Jordanians Mamlakah Hashimiyati Urduniyah etc etc
@@ÇkametThonyea he did. He disposed of the election/democratic style voting.
Nothing wrong with a kingdom. David and Sulaiman (as) were kings . When bani israil asked their prophet Samuel (as) to ask God for a king, God appointed Talut to be the king over them.
20 years of Muawiya was peaceful because he was the one who were waging wars.
@1:12:00
pertaining to the wording of the hadith thaqalain;
"itrati" meaning, progeny.
are the wives of the prophet (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh), his progeny? obviously not, because you cannot be legally married to your progeny.
"itra" is specifically referring to the five family members that the prophet (saLLaLLāhu aLayhi wa āLeh) wrapped in a big green cloak (including himself) then said; "this is my ahlul bayt."
When Al-Hasan bin `Ali moved with army units against Muawiya, `Amr bin AL-As said to Muawiya, "I see an army that will not retreat unless and until the opposing army retreats."
- Sahih al-Bukhari 7109
I thought Shias don’t believe in Al-Bukhari
@1:13:15
sooneys always expose their own falsehood when they try to argue against the truth.
earlier in the above video monologue of adnan rashid, he used an example from the Qur'an about the story of Nūh, that when Nūh said out of concern "my son" and then it was said to Nūh 'he aint from you any longer' (meaning the family bond was detached from not only the son but also the wife).
If that is case with Nūh, then why does not adnan rashid apply that same principle, when speaking about ALLāh's most beloved people, the Ahlul Kisā' (aLayhimussaLām)?
So when prophet did peace treaty wa polytheists did he endorse their action?
Was Sulah Hudaibiya a BIYAH or a treaty??
What’s the proof of bayyah coz shias don’t agree that bayyah happened!
It is in their books
Muaviya fought two battles with ruling Khalifa and is responsible for all blood shed. No one before him fought ruling Khalifa to get the power.
Muaviya forced ruling Khalifa to get the bayah, no one before him forced a ruling Khalifa to get into power.
Muaviya and Yazid both forced people to get the bayah and resulted in incidents like Karbala and Harra.
Muaviyah and Yazid were responsible for all fitnas.
May Allah curse them and people who follow them till eternity.
Nobody can force Bayah, just like nobody can force the Shahada.
Muawiyah (ra) fought Ali (ra) over finding the killers of Uthman (ra). Ali (ra) gave himself Khilafa when Uthman (ra) died. Muawiya done Ijtihad and came to the wrong judgement. Ali (ra) did not have any grudges against muawiyah (ra) over the battle of siffin. You will not find one narration even in Shia sources showing this.
Muawiya did not make himself Khalifa, the people who supported him elected him. You cannot make yourself Khalifa without the support of the people.
May Allah curse anyone who curses Muawiya (ra) and curses anyone of the muhajiroon and ansar.
Brother Rashid, what happened to you? Can you please explain how Allah in the holy Quran mentioned the treaty of hudaybiya as a great victory? How would you qualify Allah as you try to Qualify Hassan a.s in the eyes of Shia? You should be ashamed of yourself. The more knowledge you hold, the more responsibility and Allah knows best.
will be responsible for it for you." So, Al-Hasan concluded a peace treaty with Muawiya. Al-Hasan (Al-Basri) said: I heard Abu Bakr saying, "I saw Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) on the pulpit and Al-Hasan bin `Ali was by his side. The Prophet (ﷺ) was looking once at the people and once at Al-Hasan bin `Ali saying, 'This son of mine is a Saiyid (i.e. a noble) and may Allah make peace between two big groups of Muslims through him."
Bukhari 2704
Hassan (r.a) gave leadership to Muawiya (r.a) resulting in all muslims being subjected to muawiya leadership, hows that only peace treaty but not oath? literally all muslims are now under the leadership of muawiya. did prophet gave leadership of medina to kuffar in his peace treaty??
you rawafid are just deaf, dumb & blind
@@virtualwanderer
Ask yourself, why is there a need for a “peace” treaty in the first place? And as we know Muwaiyya started the custom of Kingdom and the downfall and degeneration of Islam. What does that tell you about his motives?
@Ali_0h what downfall? Islam became the greatest nation for 1000 years spreading Islam across the globe. Do you even ready history?
@@virtualwanderer
You are telling me that killing the grandson of the prophet is something great? Or pillaging Mecca, raping their woman and attacking the Kaaba is something great?
To your standards the Roman and Mongol empires were also great. What does that have anything to do with upholding the values of Islam?
Like it or not, Muawiyah is the first Islamic ruler for which there is any evidence whatsoever. All of the stories about Muhammad, his companions, and the Rashidun caliphates were composed much later by the Abbasid caliphate, who did their best to discredit their Umayyad predecessors. Many parts of the Quran are old, even older than supposed Muhammad, but almost all of the rest of Islam got inventes centuries later and the story got filled in later. We need some real archeological research into the true origins of Islam and who was Muawiyah really.
"All of the stories about Muhammad, his companions, and the Rashidun caliphates were composed much later by the Abbasid caliphate"
A big conspiracy theory, no historian whould disagree Abu Bakr or Umar etc, were real or that ruled
"almost all of the rest of Islam got inventes centuries later "
- Not possible we have entire quran from 1 century hijra in manuscript,#
we have hadith and sira literature under ummayads in the 700 up till 750 when abbasids come
😂😂😂😂 what!?!?! 😂😂😂😂 did you find your information on christian apologists websites?? 😂😂😂😂
Adnan should stop calling the specific people Khawarij, its a false presumption
Calling someone khariji without proof is ridiculous
To do that u have to take from what they say and link it with the khariji theology which is a stretch
It is Kharaji theology when you make takfir on those whom Allah has praised or given the title of a believer. The Muhajiroon and Ansar have been praised by Allah and specifically Muawiya (ra) has been praised by The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him).
========================================================
حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ مَهْدِيٍّ ، عَنْ مُعَاوِيَةَ يَعْنِي ابْنَ صَالِحٍ ، عَنْ يُونُسَ بْنِ سَيْفٍ ، عَنِ الْحَارِثِ بْنِ زِيَادٍ ، عَنْ أَبِي رُهْمٍ ، عَنِ الْعِرْبَاضِ بْنِ سَارِيَةَ السُّلَمِيِّ ، قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَهُوَ يَدْعُو إِلَى السَّحُورِ فِي شَهْرِ رَمَضَانَ: " هَلُمَّ إِلَى الْغِذَاءِ الْمُبَارَكِ" . ثُمَّ سَمِعْتُهُ ثُمَّ سَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ: " اللَّهُمَّ عَلِّمْ مُعَاوِيَةَ الْكِتَابَ، وَالْحِسَابَ، وَقِهِ الْعَذَابَ" .
Abdur-Rahman ibn Mahdi narrated to us, on the authority of Mu’awiyah, meaning ibn Salih, on the authority of Yunus ibn Sayf, on the authority of Al-Harith ibn Ziyad, on the authority of Abu Ruhm, on the authority of Al-Irbad ibn Sariyah Al-Sulami, who said:
I heard the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, calling people to the pre-dawn meal in the month of Ramadan: “Come to the blessed lunch.” Then I heard him, then I heard him say: “O God, teach Muawiyah the Book and the arithmetic, and protect him from the punishment.”
Musnad Ahmad, Vol. 27, Page 383, Hadith 17152
Sahih Ibn Khuzaymah, Vol. 3, Page 214
Siyar A'laam al-Nubala, Vol. 8, Page 38
Sahih Ibn Hibban, Vol. 16, Page 191
===============================================================================
the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition."
Sahih al-Bukhari 2924
Imam hasan never gave bayyat to muawiya never took any stiphen never called him ameerilmomineen , it was just a peace treaty for not killings of muslims between muslims
And if you want to yruly know do debate with our respected scholars and not some normal people on the road and insult shias as barking
The brothers have put out many challenges to the shia, without response (or skewered responses).
One thing though, whoever was or wasn't the leader doesn't change anything. I can say, sure, Hasan & Hussain (ra) should have been /remained Caliph at their times. I love them and would have loved to even be in their presence (also the prophet Muhammed pbuh and sahaba (ra)) How does that change anything today or prove the belief of sunni / shia today??
It's a good thing to discuss for historical purposes, but it doesn't change anything today.
The real issue to discuss is the beliefs of sunni and shia. Where do we get our beliefs and traditions from and what proof we have to support it.
Hassan (r.a) gave leadership to Muawiya (r.a) resulting in all muslims being subjected to Muawiya leadership, Hows that only Peace Treaty but not oath? Literally All Muslims are now under the leadership of Muawiya. Did Prophet gave leadership of Medina to kuffar in his peace treaty??
You Rawafid are just Deaf, Dumb & Blind
Hassan (r.a) gave leadership to Muawiya (r.a) resulting in all muslims being subjected to Muawiya leadership, Hows that only Peace Treaty but not oath? Literally All Muslims are now under the leadership of Muawiya. Did Prophet gave leadership of Medina to k.uffar in his peace treaty??
You Rawafi.d are just D.eaf, D.umb & Bl.ind
@NoNo-ci2el even their own sources have narrations of the bayah. They try to reject it by saying "he was doing taqiyyah to unite the Muslims but he never believed in it". Anyone who believes the Ahlul Bayt would take an oath in public whilst not believing it does not love them nor our beloved prophet (peace and blessings be upon him). They would rather be killed than do such a disgusting act.
Nice try salafy😂😂😂😂you killing ahl beyt and saying prophet mohama says its OK