Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Wickard v. Filburn Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 апр 2018
- Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► www.quimbee.co...
Wickard v. Filburn | 317 U.S. 111 (1942)
In 1942, the United States Supreme Court in Wickard versus Filburn told a farmer that he couldn’t have his wheat and eat it too.
In an attempt to improve the meager economic climate in the wake of the Great Depression, Congress enacted the New Deal. One piece of legislation, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, imposed a maximum quota on the amount of wheat that farmers could produce. Congress enacted the Act in response to a nationwide wheat surplus relative to demand.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here www.quimbee.co...
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► www.quimbee.co...
Have Questions about this Case?
Submit your questions and get answers from real attorney here: www.quimbee.co...
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our RUclips Channel ► www.youtube.co...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► www.quimbee.co...
Facebook ► / quimbeedotcom
Twitter ► / quimbeedotcom
casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
This ignores the fact that the commerce clause was to prevent states from raising tariffs on each other- not to override the rest of the constitution and grant congress nearly unlimited power. FDR threatened to continually add justices to the supreme court until this power was approved.
Based FDR
@@spencermcclure1922 *debased
@@spencermcclure1922 Based? Nothing based about that behavior.
One of the worst decisions ever!
why lmao
@@thederpsters880 because it gave congress unlimited power to do anything for all intents and purposes.
@@david52875 It didn’t really give congress unlimited power. They reached a conclusion based on whether the farmers decision had any effect interstate commerce. And it technically did.
@@Rocky-fk3ol You can argue literally anything has an effect on interstate commerce. Even intrastate commerce. Even intrastate non-commercial activity. See Gonzalez v. Raich
@@david52875 I saw the case. Yes anything can technically count as interstate commerce, but the question is, what limit does congress have under the commerce clause? These cases may seem like congress has unlimited power. But congress is limited by the constitution. Schechter Poultry Corps. V. United States.
And thus the entire 10th Amendment was rendered moot. Why bother to even have states?
Why bother to even have a government at all?
I wonder if corruption from larger commercial wheat farms had anything to do with the passing of the Agricultural Adjustment Act in congress.
Well..: knowing what we know now (about certain drug cartels) we could almost assume it!
Just because he couldnt grow his own wheat doesnt mean that he would necesarily buy wheat on the interstate market. I dont think that using the commerce clause like that is justified in this situation because at this point you arent regulating interstate commerce, you're just exploiting people financialy by requiring them to buy stuff.
He was trying to make sure he had enough
Welcome to capitalism
This is a fucking ridiculous judgement...
Terrible decision, definitely needs to be overturned. The overreach is absurd.
We’d have to literally restructure the entire legal framework of almost every single major law passed since this case was decided. It would throw the entire economy into utter and complete chaos and many federal agencies like the EPA, ATF, FDA, and DEA would lose almost all of their power completely. As most bans on goods would be lifted and people could make their own heroin or meth at home. This is one of the reasons that prohibition, the banning of the sale and production of alcohol, needed a full constitutional amendment to pass.
@@kekero540 those agencies SHOULD lose all their power. They shouldn't even exist. Chevron Deference is one of the biggest legal errors in American history.
@@SeraphsWitness while I agree those agencies have a lot of bullets and a lot of money and jobs reliant upon them. “Oh a Supreme Court judge doesn’t like Wickard vs Filburn? Whoops! Looks like he killed himself with 6 bullet wounds to the back of the head”
I like to call this case "Wicked v. Filburn."
I can’t believe I’ve never heard of this! It’s so crazy!!
Dumbest court ruling ever
not the dumbest, they knew what they were doing, this is the most evil court decision other than the dred scott case.
@@notlogical4016 What about Plessy v. Ferguson or Barren v. Baltimore.
@@notlogical4016 Korematsu?
How was this unanimous? Sheesh
FDR threatening to pack the court like a king.
@@christiangadfly24 a fucking dictator, i understand why people called him a fascist when he was president
The courts decision was very controversial. But you gotta look at it from the supreme courts perspective. The courts had to look purely on the effects the farmers decision had on commerce.
@@christiangadfly24franklin rose?
@@big5585 yeah
One of the worst decisions of all time.
The idea that Congress, or any branch of government, can tell us what to produce, how much to produce, or how to manage it, is light years from what the Founders intended. That is central planning in the Soviet style!
this is the *actual* type of communism every one whines about
@@Rosemary-ql4hk which is why we need to tear it down
💯
Worst case ever decided in American history.
Imagine thinking this is worse than Barren v. Baltimore or Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Yea there have been far worse decisions, purely on a moral level. But this one is pretty bad.
@@SeraphsWitness Right, people somehow ignore Korematsu
Thank you for the excellent video Did Bless and be safe
It's worth it guys how else would we have really smooth roads?
One wheat farmer disliked this video
🤣🤣👍
Subjugation to nobilities ??? Argued it wrong with interstate commerce arguement ?
Because Filburn was engaged in federally regulated commerce as a “farmer”, even his locally produced wheat was decided to be subject to their industry regulation😒🤔… If Filburn was not operating a business(the locally run dairy farm), then his activity would have fallen outside of congress’s control IMHO. Still the dumbest decision ever adjudicated legal, next to “the new deal” that started it…
We now have the SCOTUS in place to fix this injustice.
"Land of the free!"
The court is just the PR department of the executive branch. Their job is to tell us why what the executive branch does is legal.
Laws aren’t real and they will be changed or applied in any manner they see fit. Don’t play their game, they’re cheaters.
it is the power of the congress that is at issue here
God I hate this fucking ruling.
The biggest harm caused by an economic crisis is usually to do with the government's response to the crisis.
Gotta love Progressives......🙄