Deep Purple keep rolling on💜 Never stopped the machine in rock!! Thank you Steve Morse for keeping the ship on course! Ride off into the glorious sunset Purple, you've earned your destiny 💜
Tbh, I know this album is a cover album, and it’s a little different to their usual, but I think we should just be grateful that they’re bringing out new music for us fans to listen to and especially with their age and various issues over the years, I think it’s astonishing that they still make music to this standard, so I think that needs to be appreciated
Without a doubt, they are my favourite band, and have been since 1970. Seen them so many times and have read loads about them. Like others, I was a little disappointed when I first heard they were going to release a covers album but then delighted that they were still releasing material. Given that nearly all of their great albums have been the results of "jam sessions" and they eschew bringing ready made tracks into the studio, getting an album of new material together when they're isolated around the globe was impossible. What they've done is used the unfortunate circumstances we're all been facing these past 24 months to put together an album of their favourite pieces of music and put a "Purple" twist on them. Certainly, they have had fun, and it's good to hear that they can still perform, albeit in isolation, at a significantly higher level than many modern bands. Roger Glover has said they had fun and they are contemplating another studio album. I say, thank you Purple for doing what you have done. I am enjoying the album because it's fun and it's meant to be fun. It will certainly play if we're allowed social activities over the festive season beacuse it is a "party" album.
I didn't listen to it, only heard Oh Well, and I was blown away. As a Green White & Moore fanatic, I was elated that they p(l)aied their respects to Greeny who was sadly lost just as they were releasing the previous album.
I really love this one. Sounds like they’re having a lot of fun, and it’s a really enjoyable listen. One of the better cover albums out there if you ask me.
I've listened to this maybe 6 or 7 times now and it's growing on me. Many of these songs will be the songs that inspired the guys in their youth and they've earned the right to cover them. Current favourites are "Oh Well" which for me is the standout track closely followed by "Let the Good Times Roll" which is clearly Paicey giving it the Big Band swing treatment (just like he did with "Wring That Neck" at the Albert Hall in'99). There's plenty to like about the whole album if you give it time. Obviously down to personal taste but if you're not that keen yet, give it a few more spins.
Glover in a recent interview stated that part of the inspiration for the title was not simply that they were stealing songs from other artists but that some fans would immediately think it a crime that they were doing an album of covers. He basically said they did it, it was fun and they don’t care that some people don’t like it. It is what it is - the cd is there for your pleasure or not. He said they don’t make music to cater to some fans to try to create a certain sound that some fans think is the purple sound, but rather make a record they want to make as musicians and hopefully people will enjoy it. (That’s what makes fans great each has its demands biases etc - there is no way they can please everyone) Purple to DP isn’t just the organ sound or the Gillan screams - purple to them is whatever music they make at that moment in time.
First time comment but I've been waching for some time. I'm 70 and Deep Purple has been one of my favorite bands since Hush in '68. So I've grown up with them. I've also been a fan of these song most of my life. I love this album. It shows me that these are some of their favs. I guess that my age makes this album nearer to my heart.
I went to see Deep Purple and Nazareth back around 1976 or so. Nazareth put on a great show that I'll never forget, fantastic. Deep Purple came out and it was SO FREAKIN' LOUD you coudn't hear yourself think! One of my buddies went out in the lobby and fell in the floor, he said it was just so loud it made him sick, I was up in my girlfriend's ear screaming and she couldn't even hear me! Flash forward to 2001, I had moved to Houston a few years earlier and I"ve always been a huge Nazareth fan so they were opening for Deep Purple again in this huge outdoor arena. Ted Nugent was there, Cheap Trick, Lynyrd Skynyrd and a couple of local bands, the guitar player for Cheap Trick started screaming at one of the guys up in the front rows after he thought he threw something on the stage, cussing and screaming at the poor guy. Turns out he was yelling at the wrong guy! They had the guy that he was screaming at on one of the radio stations later in the week explaining that he wasn't the one that threw what ever it was on the stage so that was pretty funny. Nazareth, Ted Nugent, even Cheap Trick were all great , especially Nazareth. Deep Purple came out and I was preparing my ears for the torture but the sound system was the best I've ever heard before or since, it was still loud as ever but crystal clear. Steve Morse was on fire that day as were the whole band, maybe the best show I've ever seen. Skynyrd was good too but Deep Purple that day may be the best ever.
Deep Purple the first rock band to released 2 or more studio albums in 7 decades. 1960s - 3 albums 1970s - 7 albums 1980s - 2 albums 1990s - 4 albums 2000s - 2 albums 2010s - 2 albums 2020s - 2 albums or maybe more. As far as I know, there's no other band who did this.
The Stones just fall short with single showings in 00 and 10. 20s remain to be seen. Of course, you could be including live releases, but most of these are older shows. There's still hope for AC/DC. But they've gotta do it till the 30s. Note, I guess it was only one release in 14 and then one in 20, but technically that album was due in 19. Damn, COVID!
@@philford1730 Scorpions comes even closer: 1970's- 6 albums (Lonesome Crow; Fly to the Rainbow; In Trance; Virgin Killer; Taken by Force; Lovedrive) 1980's- 4 albums (Animal Magnetism; Blackout; Love at First Sting; Savage Amusement) 1990's- 4 albums (Crazy World; Face the Heat; Pure Instinct; Eye II Eye) 2000's- 2 albums (Unbreakable; Humanity: Hour I) 2010's- 2 albums (Sting in the Tail; Return to Forever)
Man you hit this one right on the head, that's why I come here for your reviews, I know even when it comes to your favorite band you're not going to bulshit me...
Been a Deep Purple fan since Shades of Deep Purple. (68?) I love the new album. I’ll use every song somewhere in my playlists and have already ordered the cd.
I just listened to the entire album today. Whether it's covers or originals either way it's a great album to listen to. And it's always a joy to hear Ian's voice. I thought the cover of Peter Green's oh well was a dandy. And it was a very interesting choice of covers especially the Bob seger song. I can't wait to hear their next album and hopefully it will be original but either way it's great to hear the guys hard at work making music. 😎
Almost didn't buy the album after this review. Not a fan of rock & roll-covers and such. But then I did get a copy and am very happy with it, a real nostalgic good time rockin' affair, been playing it a lot, great record to put on when you have visitors ... familiar tunes, but new. I can understand that if you expect or want something from a band, a record like this can be disappointing. I love Dixie Chicken, going to check out Little Feat.
So this got delayed in the mail and I managed to avoid listening to anything before it arrived, other than 7 and 7 is. It came on Tuesday and I've had a chance to listen to it a few times now. I'm a big Purple fan but genuinely enjoy the album, it sounds like Purple as in for the most part they've put their stamp on the songs and to me it's just a kind of feel good positive vibes album. I was apprehensive going into it based on it being a covers album and their awful rendition of Roadhouse Blues but overall I'm pretty happy with the album. Still want another genuine Purple album though.
I was exactly the same. Really really disappointed when hearing they were doing a covers album. But after a few days, I calmed down and realise these guys have the right to do whatever they want! You can definitely tell they had such a great time doing this. I won’t listen to it a whole lot but I have no complaints about this album any more
Not a fan of covers albums myself in most cases definitely prefer the originals, the general reception of this album however seems to be rather positive judging by comments left on the three music videos released so far. I think people are happily surprised DP still sound so good and playful, more than anything.
@@vincentrathbone26 Yes they did like many/most bands in their early years, not many later on. I actually think those early covers generally speaking were pretty good. Not all cover songs are created equal, not even from the same band
I personally love it ! Its the guys just having fun and it gets me moving :) Biased as they are my best band of all time ! Its just for fun, so why not , now what ?!
The album sounds excellent and in the context of COVID constraints and how they work, then it makes perfect sense. I have noticed lots of very appreciative comments and good reviews of it thus far. I expect a new album, hopefully a new double album, of all new material in either 2022 or 2023. DP have adapted wonderfully well to circumstances and continue to make a great and influential contribution. Whitesnake and Glenn Hughes both did Deep Purple covers in recent years, and it seems to me entirely valid for DP to cover songs that influenced them, and I suspect that we will now see other bands follow suit. DP continue to blaze a trail of adaptive creative thinking and approaches.
I'll give my right arm if anyone in this band was "influenced" by a novelty song like "Battle of New Orleans" but OK...We know Gillan wasn't anyway because he said none of these songs were his suggestions, all of which the band rejected (might be interesting to know what he wanted to do instead). Also can't imagine that Steve Morse picked that one because it meant something to him. The suggestion others made of this being a "money grab" might make more sense if I were taking a more negative view but I'll go along with their own explanation of this being something they did to "keep busy". But that also means these songs probably weren't an actual tribute to the included original artists either which is the usual reason for doing such an album (besides the $'s)
@@wolf1977 My sense is that most albums, in themselves, even chart successful ones, do not make money, but rather it is touring and merchandise that makes groups like DP some income. Hence, I see this album as a creative outlet in the circumstances. All DP fans want a new album of new material, and that will now follow, and I am very pleased to have this intermediate contribution from DP, and it deserves to be appreciated for what it is, rather than dismissed for what it is not.
@@dougiehall457 I think I'm seeing what this is just fine which is at best a mediocre covers album made to keep busy. The problem is that that's greatly outweighed (in a negative way unfortunately for me) by what it isn't & that's why the focus for me is on the negative aspects
Pete, I had been waiting to hear your take on this album. You had been saying for weeks that you really didn't want a covers album from DP. DP is obviously one of you favorite all-time bands and you set high expectations from them. My favorite DP albums are the ones that Ian Paice plays drums on(that's all of them). Although I don't agree with you on all criticisms of all the songs, I think some of these song ideas are fun and out of left field for the band. As a singing drummer, I'm always looking for more songs for myself to cover in my bag of songs. So, the easy boogie-woogie and Blues/R&B tunes are the ones I gravitate to. Those were probably the songs the band thought would just to be fun to record in the lockdown times...and the added horns adds another texture you don't expect from Purple. I thought the strong covers on this album were basically the same ones you pointed out. The "Oh Well" cover really highlighted Morse's guitar interpretations with Airey's Hammond playing. I did love the "Dixie Chicken" cover as a Little Feat fan. I do like your suggestion to make it more of a Deep Purple version than a straight copy. Instead of Don Airey using the piano sound, he could mix in some DP sounding Hammond organ inflections throughout. Now, I felt you may have been a little unfair about their version of "Shapes of Things." When I first saw the track listing, I was hoping they would do the Jeff Beck Group version(later covered by Gary Moore w/Paicey on drums). But, they opted for the Yardbirds version instead. What I didn't notice is (on first listen) was that they switched mid-song at the guitar solo from the Yardbirds version to the Jeff Beck Group version. I probably don't hold Deep Purple to the standard that you do. I figure they've been making music their way for most of my lifetime, they can do it any way they want. Thanks for the review, Pete!
Yes they (and any band really but especially one with 50+ years of quality behind them) can do what they want but that doesn't mean we have to like or buy it. I suspect they know that and album sales & general listener feedback will tell them what people thought of the album
Yes this is pretty much what Glover said in a recent interview. Part of the inspiration for the title was not simply that they were doing covers but that some fans would immediately think it a crime that they were doing covers. He basically said they did it, it was fun and they don’t care that some people don’t like it. It is what it is - the cd is there for your pleasure or not. He said they don’t make music to cater to their fans to create a sound they think is the purple sound, but rather make a record they want to make as musicians and hopefully people will enjoy it. Purple to them isn’t just the organ sound or the Gillan screams - purple to them is whatever they make.
Everything Led Zeppelin did were considered cover albums, plus The Beatles did their share of covers. That being said, I think Deep Purple wanted to pay homage to some of the songs they were inspired by. It's a rock n roll album, instead of a heavy project. I don't buy albums anymore because there are no record stores near me. But I thought some of the tracks on "Turning To Crime" were quite good. Though I do not usually like cover material, this album was obviously done for Purple to have fun with a whole album of songs they didn't compose. Besides, "Roadhouse Blues" and "Kentucky Woman" were covers. I was surprised how good Purple still sound, so I think I can overlook the criticism of their one off Sha Na Na opus. If I had my wish, Ian Gillian would rejoin Sabbath for "Born Again II."
“Everything Led Zeppelin did we considered cover albums.” Apart from 1, which was brought out as a calling card intended to capture the band’s chemistry and dynamism, I don’t think I could disagree any more.
Im with you 100 percent on this Pete. I am so tired of bands covering the same songs over and over. Unless they really change it and make it their own image
Thanks for what seems to be a fair review and commentary of this covers album. Probably not high on my list though it will get a listen at some point. Interesting though since I came to Deep Purple way back when with their single and cover of Hush. But, if for no reason other than watching your expressions while discussing the band cover a Bob Dylan song, this episode was great.
I went to Barnes and Noble on Saturday they had the CD in stock, but were unable get it, so I had to order. I'm waiting for it to come in. I feel as though they were kind of going back to their roots with the MK1 Line-Up when they did cover songs on their first three albums. On their 'Whoosh' album they re-recorded And The Address. Thanks for the review. (EDIT) The album finally came in, I'm really digging their cover of 'Oh Well' Rating: 3/5 for me
I rarely pick up cover albums, so I had no intention of purchasing this one. Especially after seeing the track listing. It will be the first DP release with Gillan that I don't have. I don't have any problem with bands doing this, it's just not for me. I'm just glad they're still around.
Same here, will pass on this one. They really should've waited out COVID & used the time to write new material instead of expending time & energy on this covers album
@@wolf1977 Exactly, sitting in their own separate homes in lock down means putting out music that is easier to create - hence covers albums galore. Sure, musicians need to earn money but my guess is that the members of UFO, Saxon and Deep Purple all have enough money already to survive a few years of "no work". This therefore smacks of greedy and cynical record companies forcing them to do these albums and, to a lesser extent, the bands themselves.
@@patrikpersson1319 This isn't a conversation. This is you crying (you seem to do a lot of that, typical for your subspecies) and I'm laughing. Your obsession brings me joy.
I actually really enjoyed this album for what it was, something to keep them busy during the pandemic and a chanee for them to share with their fans the music they grew up on. 7 and 7 is was great, as was Oh Well, loved their rendition of Lucifer and the Medley was fun.
I totally agree with you not crazy with it not big on covers albums rather hear them do originals wish they would have them do their spin on them btw I love Lucifer early Seger kicks ass
Not inspired, I thought he sounded OK. If someone is looking for affirmation that he can still sing then you do get that here. I guess that's kinda "inspiring"...well actually more like "reassuring"
It's Ian Gillan at 76 years old...his voice is what it is and has been for about 20 years. He sounds like he's having fun, and I don't mind elder statesman Gillan at all.
@@seaoftranquilityprog I think his voice has actually held up better than McCartney's (unfortunately). Even Sir Elton is really showing his age, he's almost the same age (74) as Gillan
I gave this a spin a few nights-ago after seeing its release. I’ve always loved Deep Purple & was curious to hear how Ian’s voice was holding-up. It wasn’t what I expected, but it was a cool listen. Very big fans will love this or hate it, I think. It’s a post-card from this weird period of history & we’ll see a lot of projects like this in the coming months.
Agreed not big on covers I like an artists original material . Speaking of Ian Gillan I finally got around to checking out The Ian Gillan Band and Gillan. Pete your not kidding when you said it is some really great material that sadly didn't get the attention it deserves. Bought 3 of the albums today and plan on getting the whole catalog of Gillan and Ian Gillan band.
I think the covers album is a bonus because they haven’t been touring. It doesn’t mean they haven’t got some new stuff in the can ready for next year. Although it’s not up with their last three albums, I think it’s pretty good.
If they're working on new stuff (or even if they're not) I would've totally been OK with waiting for that new album. The arguments made by many that "something from them is better than nothing" seems to assume that the band has to release something every so often. Why? That's along the lines of quantity is better than quality, a camp to which I don't ascribe. Also usually bands release albums so that: 1) They can sell them for lots of $'s & 2) They can tour those songs for lots of $'s. COVID took away option #2 so the cynic would say it was mostly a money grab. The band said it was to stay busy during COVID...Also usually cover records are made to pay tribute but I don't buy that here (especially if you accept their explanation which I do). I think it's best to accept this for what it is & either buy it or not, then move on. I think the next one'll be much better...
Well, musically I'd agree with you 90%. I mean I love Let the Good Time Roll, I think Mr. Gillan's voice and performance on it was superb. But the thing is, I cannot build any opinion about any Deep Purple work, only on musical level. It has to be a little bit personal too. For me, Deep Purple sounds like they are sharing some private moments with me in this album, while they're having a blast doing it, and for me, this is more than enough to enjoy this songs. But musically speaking, 7 and 7 is, is a great cover, and it's easily could've been a Purple song. Rockin' Pneumonia and the Boogie Woogie Flu, usually I don't prefer this kind of songs if not for a very little thing Mr. Airey done with his piano here. Oh Well .... just magnificent ... when I first read that this is gonna be on the new Purple covers album, I imagine it being performed by Deep Purple and I thought that's great, it could be sound like it was really written by Purple. when I first listened to the song it was not as I imagine it, but it was great, and I enjoy it more actually. Jenny Take a Ride! and Watching the River Flow ... I'm not a big fan Let the Good Times Roll .. I just love it ... it's not a song that you can imagine Purple play ... maybe it's more of Ian Paice thing .. it's just I was amazed by Gillan's voice in this song. Dixie Chicken ... not a fan too Shapes of Things, and White Room ... I wish they chose other songs ... maybe Politician would've sound great with them. The Battle of New Orleans, I like it ... it's fun. Lucifer, one of the best tracks in the album. Caught in the Act ... for me this is the weakest thing in the album. Overall ... anything from Deep Purple is very dear to me.
Pete, I usually agree with you. Not this time. I thoroughly enjoy this album from start to finish. It’s total fun, the playing is top notch, and the sound quality is excellent.
Agree with you on this one. These guys have taken me on a musical journey for decades and this is just one more fascinating piece of music they are sharing.
Yup ... fair review ... bang on ... and shows why subscribing to a streaming service is ok ... I use Qoboz which, when combined with an external USB DAC, allows me to put the headphones on and to listen to brand new albums in HiRes quality before making a judgement call to buy a physical copy ... the subsription more than pays for itself in avoiding spending cash on duds like this ... and I am a fan of the band. I listened to Doobie Brothers Liberte (superb) before getting the CD ... ditto re David Crosby, Pink Floyd remix of Momentary Lapse of Reason, Bob Dylan's great Springtime in New York, etc. (Gotta love Bob ... but he does have his share of dudsctoo) ... I love having a physical copy but if you can try (in high resolution) before you buy it's a great (no brainer) option ... and it's also great to spend a couple of hours each week checking out new releases that you'd otherwise never try ... and I can check out all the SoT recommendations too ...
I'm a big Purple fan of all line ups but I hesitated to buy this one. A friend is an even bigger fan and called it a piece of crap. I don't know if its that bad but I agree their last 3 releases were stellar . On another note thanks for the recommendation on the Billy Gibbons and Styx ,I bought them on vinyl and agree some of the best releases this past year.
This comment is from someone who stopped digging what DP was doing from around about 1993 onwards - just watched the video of 7 and 7 is, there's great energy in the performances of all (but it's obvious there's some "studio body" being added to Gillan's voice) - I might try to download their version of "Watchin' the River Flow" - always liked that Dylan song and Gillan's far more limited vocal capabilities (compared to his prime in the 1970s) should make for an interesting cover as Dylan - a great song writer - was able to render the lyrics pretty well despite his vocal limitations !!??!!
Bassist Roger Glover made his vocal debut on this new Purple album...with, "The Battle of New Orleans." Also, the album cover has a nice texture to it. I guess Pete, didn't think those were worthy of a mention. Nonetheless, a cool album for waiting on the next Purple platter.
That’s what makes this album so effective- the variety of songs. When I listened to the original before I heard Purples version I was like ‘geeze’ , but it fits right in with the mix of songs
What's ironic. At the same time DP released this, The Temperance Movement released their "Covers & Rarities" album, which included a cover of DP's "You Fool No One" with Ian Paice on drums.
You can tour anything as long as you pay the royalty fees for playing someone else's music. As to what kinds of venues you can fill by doing that is a different question...
This is a question about a different kind of cover, does Ian Paice wear a wig? I remember pictures from come taste the band and his hair was really frizzy looking? Pretty sure Blackmore wears one. Just curious.
I agree with what Tee C and others below have said. Their comments are all valid, honest and admirable. But if you sweep away all the dried raisins, we're still not left with enough bran to fill a tiny cup. It's not so much that it's a covers album, as I have no issue with covers in general, but it's more the tracks they chose to cover that makes on question "what criteria did they use in selecting the tracks?" Is it band member favorites from over the years? Tracks in the public domain? Selections by contest winners who voted? (I know - ridiculous)? They could do another one and it wouldn't bother me at all; I might even love it. But if they a cover of anything by Neil Sedaka.....
Am quite enjoying this. Of course I'd much rather hear original stuff, but if they'd done one so quickly after Whoosh I doubt it'd been very good. So...I'd rather have this now than not have this at all, if that makes sense. Airey and Morse are playing great throughout.
@@wolf1977 a) because they wanted to and were probably bored in lock down b) they're still alive (not to be taken for granted at their age). What the fans want always should be secondary to an artist.
@@arto2533 No not asking whey the BAND would want to do it but why YOU feel that they need to release an album of covers since as you say you'd much rather have them do originals. So to YOU what would've been wrong with them waiting a few more months & releasing that (most likely) much better record? I love Purple & Morse but I would've been totally fine with never hearing this one... I think at least part of the reason for musicians making albums is for their fans, I wouldn't totally discount that. Sure they can release whatever they want & we the fans can buy it or not. We're criticizing something here that's already been released so it's not like we get a vote as to whether this album ever comes out or not, that ship has sailed. This is feedback for the band, they can listen to it or not, also the $'s resulting from sales will tell them something...
@@wolf1977 No, I said i'd "rather have this than not have it" since I enjoy it to some degree. Never said I really needed a new Purple album now or ever. And calling fans' expectations secondary is hardly "totally discounting" them. Focus a bit on what's actually being written and meant instead of twisting everything. There is really nothing to argue about here. It seems to be a somewhat polarizing work, as it was always going to be regardless of the quality of it.
@@arto2533 I'm totally focusing on what you actually wrote, like "rather have this than not have it" - doesn't that mean you'd rather have anything from them than nothing even if you prefer new material? If that's not what you meant to say (I'm not a mindreader) then you didn't write what you meant, or at least didn't write it well. Maybe a better way to put it might have been: "I'd rather have a new album of new material but since I like at least some of these covers I'm OK with this album too" - or something similar. You did also write "if this makes sense" & I guess to me it doesn't... When you say "What the fans want always should be secondary to an artist" that to me means that whatever they want to put out goes, which of course is true, but ignores that at least part of the reason musicians make music is for the fans and so it can and should also be at least a minor factor in what a band records/releases. You didn't mention that aspect which is why I did... " it was always going to be (polarizing) regardless of the quality of it" - NO! Sure all albums regardless of quality will be disliked by some, the difference here is the sheer number of dislikes which should tell you something (which is that most don't like it) & that's the point. That really has nothing to do with whether you or I think they should've made it in the first place, which is what we're discussing here. If it were then no albums would ever be released... What makes Purple die-hard fans so unique (to me) is the strength of their opinions about this band, it's really something (just read the posts re: the non-Blackmore versions of Purple for a little taste). They remind me of Kiss fans, though totally different music & their fanaticism isn't even totally music-based, in their tenacity to defend their band at all costs. Someone here suggested that those of us who don't like this album are doing so out of some sort of personal attack or hatred of the band (which it's not) & I actually see the opposite, that those who do like it are often in attack mode like they need to defend the band for some reason & you're frankly starting to come off that way too. Same thing happened when Wolfgang Van Halen's first album came out & Van Halen fans attacked those of us who didn't think much of that record... Instead, accept that this was a "COVID project to keep busy" as the band said, like this album or don't, buy it or don't, wait for the next album that'll undoubtedly be better than this one & contain original songs, and be happy. It's that simple 👍Frankly any time a band tells me that their new album was made "to keep busy" that doesn't bode well for me ultimately liking it, but I'll still listen to it to decide
I quite liked the songs I never knew to well and wasn’t enthused by the more popular songs. As always the musicianship is amazing. Ian Paice stands out and Gillan is singing better than he has in a decade. Hope they can capture this energy and rock it up for the next album of original songs.
The Dylan cover is fantastic, such an interesting choice for them, but it works for me, I think it’s one of the best songs on the album. By the look of your face Pete, it is because of your dislike for Dylan, you just can’t get past that. I like 7 and 7 Is, Oh Well and Lucifer are my other favs.
Gotta respectfully disagree. I love Dylan, and was excited to hear their version. The original is just a mid tempo folk country thing that doesn’t do anything for me. Purple’s version is…mid temp folk country with a different vocalist. I don’t get it.
@@teec3557 Best ever slide guitar on any Purple record? Tommy Bolin on come Taste The Band, I know many die-hards will disagree (also happens to be my fave Purple album). Come to think of it did Blackmore even play slide much, especially with Purple? He wasn't really known for his slide playing
Come Taste the Band - the most underrated and overlooked Purple album. Top 5 for me. Lord said it wasn’t a Purple album but it was a damn good album. I never understood why he said that - I had no problem accepting it as a Purple album
@@wolf1977 It‘s kinda funny though, also with Glover singing. I loved it a bit more than the whole blues stuff on the record but it‘s not even nearly as good as 7 And 7 Is, Oh Well, Lucifer and White Room (I know they didn‘t change a lot on this one but it kinda always specifically reminded me of DP/Uriah Heep anyway)
Wow didn’t realize you were so rigid with regard to Purple. Always loved when DP ventures outside their comfort zone and away from ‘their sound’. Love watching listening to them stretch themselves and display their musicianship. Absolutely great album - will listen to this one many times do to the variety. Also one thing you fail to mention- the damn underlying power of some of these songs leave the originals in the dust.
I have a question about a different kind of cover, does Ian Paice wear a wig ? I remember pictures from come taste the band and hair was really frizzy . Pretty sure Blackmore wear one.
I quite agree with you I got hundreds of c.d of cover albums by famous bands all sounding the same and unless they put their own spin on it it’s boring.keep them new albums coming Pete it great to hear your views bye🤣
I can understand the covers argument, but we can't deny that Gillan is struggling with his vocal. Many tracks, I feel, are suited to his lesser range and are well performed. After having many an enjoyable experience with Whoosh ! I was particularly impressed with And the Address.. thinking.. wouldn't it be nice to do a homage to their original line up, as I feel that Nick and Rod were poorly treated back then, when they made some fine songs. And the Address Hush The Shield Chasing Shadows Emeretta Hey Joe ------------ Wring that Neck Mandrake Root The Bird has Flown Kentucky Woman April This would make a real appreciation for the ever present Mr. Paice, too.. and I'm sure that they could have a lot of fun making it. Great post, Pete 👍
I think you have to understand that these guys have been living in isolation for the past couple of years like the rest of us. I don't think they had much opportunity for any kind of writing sessions.
I think they sound great. Reminds me of Rush’s feedback; they’re just having fun and sometimes you need to hear your bands do that. Cool mix of songs, too!
@@LarryFleetwood8675 Of course, but when Purple is playing Little Feat, I think it's fair to compare anything where a classic rock band does a covers record :)
One positive I’m hoping comes from this album is when they write another original album, playing other bands stuff may free them up a bit and get more ideas flowing. Just a thought 🤷♂️
I think that this is an album that I would have enjoyed watching Deep Purple put this album together in a studio more than listening to the finished album. It's fun watching the Beatles goof around in the studio just to have fun. It would have been fun hearing the boys just have fun.
It depends on how well or even original a bands covers are. Halestorm for instance does a great job. Sometime even better than the original. Another excellent cover album is Rush's Feedback.
I tend to like cover albums, 2 that come to mind are Queensryche and Yngwie's but not so sure about this one as I didn't recognize any of the songs you mentioned.
Sounds like more of an excuse to soften the blow for those of us who end up listening to it (or actually buying it) instead of an explanation. You might ask them: "If you have to get together to record & you didn't see each other during COVID then how'd you record this one? If you did it remotely then why not remotely record a new album containing new songs?". I've read that they're "working on" new material meaning it isn't all done, so I take that as the primary reason why this was a covers album
Pete there is more to like then to dislike... Ian's scream may be gone but his mid range singing voice is sounding better then the last few albums. A fun listen reminds me a little bit of the Rush "Feedback" album. My only complaint would be they should have done the full version of "Dazed and Confused"
Yeah, as an album probably hit and miss. Remember though, these are old guys who like everyone have been in lockdown. Recording remotely for Deep Purple is an alien concept, so to write new material in a relatively short window was unlikely. A group of mates and stellar musicians having fun ys what this is. You can clearly hear Gillan solo album styles alongside Steve Morse infused tunes. Lucifer, like Pete says is as close to Purple as it gets.
PS. Reading Festival 1983 still haunts me to this day - "Deep Sabbath" (or "Black Purple") on stage with Ian Gillan singing "Paranoid" and Tonny Iommi doing the riff to "Smoke On The Water"... I still feel very confused now, almost 40 years later.
@@wolf1977 Don't get me wrong, it was a good gig and I also like the "Born Again" album, in it's own way. But that still didn't make it any less "weird" when watching them live on stage.
There aren’t too many rock bands that can do what DP did on this album which I appreciate and find enjoyable.
Deep Purple keep rolling on💜 Never stopped the machine in rock!! Thank you Steve Morse for keeping the ship on course! Ride off into the glorious sunset Purple, you've earned your destiny 💜
Tbh, I know this album is a cover album, and it’s a little different to their usual, but I think we should just be grateful that they’re bringing out new music for us fans to listen to and especially with their age and various issues over the years, I think it’s astonishing that they still make music to this standard, so I think that needs to be appreciated
Nice one. I agree totally 👍
Without a doubt, they are my favourite band, and have been since 1970. Seen them so many times and have read loads about them. Like others, I was a little disappointed when I first heard they were going to release a covers album but then delighted that they were still releasing material. Given that nearly all of their great albums have been the results of "jam sessions" and they eschew bringing ready made tracks into the studio, getting an album of new material together when they're isolated around the globe was impossible. What they've done is used the unfortunate circumstances we're all been facing these past 24 months to put together an album of their favourite pieces of music and put a "Purple" twist on them. Certainly, they have had fun, and it's good to hear that they can still perform, albeit in isolation, at a significantly higher level than many modern bands. Roger Glover has said they had fun and they are contemplating another studio album. I say, thank you Purple for doing what you have done. I am enjoying the album because it's fun and it's meant to be fun. It will certainly play if we're allowed social activities over the festive season beacuse it is a "party" album.
After a few more listens, I changed my mind. It's actually quite good! A bit of a grower.
I love it! Love the party vibe! Gillan even pulls out a few cool screams!
I love it too!! It’s brilliant!!! This guys a hoser....🤗
I didn't listen to it, only heard Oh Well, and I was blown away. As a Green White & Moore fanatic, I was elated that they p(l)aied their respects to Greeny who was sadly lost just as they were releasing the previous album.
Thanks for the honesty!
I really love this one. Sounds like they’re having a lot of fun, and it’s a really enjoyable listen. One of the better cover albums out there if you ask me.
Fucking A album, i love it.
Who can pull this off, they can!
Deep Purple is my Nr 1, 4 ever.
I've listened to this maybe 6 or 7 times now and it's growing on me. Many of these songs will be the songs that inspired the guys in their youth and they've earned the right to cover them.
Current favourites are "Oh Well" which for me is the standout track closely followed by "Let the Good Times Roll" which is clearly Paicey giving it the Big Band swing treatment (just like he did with "Wring That Neck" at the Albert Hall in'99). There's plenty to like about the whole album if you give it time.
Obviously down to personal taste but if you're not that keen yet, give it a few more spins.
Glover in a recent interview stated that part of the inspiration for the title was not simply that they were stealing songs from other artists but that some fans would immediately think it a crime that they were doing an album of covers. He basically said they did it, it was fun and they don’t care that some people don’t like it. It is what it is - the cd is there for your pleasure or not. He said they don’t make music to cater to some fans to try to create a certain sound that some fans think is the purple sound, but rather make a record they want to make as musicians and hopefully people will enjoy it. (That’s what makes fans great each has its demands biases etc - there is no way they can please everyone) Purple to DP isn’t just the organ sound or the Gillan screams - purple to them is whatever music they make at that moment in time.
First time comment but I've been waching for some time. I'm 70 and Deep Purple has been one of my favorite bands since Hush in '68. So I've grown up with them. I've also been a fan of these song most of my life. I love this album. It shows me that these are some of their favs. I guess that my age makes this album nearer to my heart.
I went to see Deep Purple and Nazareth back around 1976 or so. Nazareth put on a great show that I'll never forget, fantastic. Deep Purple came out and it was SO FREAKIN' LOUD you coudn't hear yourself think! One of my buddies went out in the lobby and fell in the floor, he said it was just so loud it made him sick, I was up in my girlfriend's ear screaming and she couldn't even hear me! Flash forward to 2001, I had moved to Houston a few years earlier and I"ve always been a huge Nazareth fan so they were opening for Deep Purple again in this huge outdoor arena. Ted Nugent was there, Cheap Trick, Lynyrd Skynyrd and a couple of local bands, the guitar player for Cheap Trick started screaming at one of the guys up in the front rows after he thought he threw something on the stage, cussing and screaming at the poor guy. Turns out he was yelling at the wrong guy! They had the guy that he was screaming at on one of the radio stations later in the week explaining that he wasn't the one that threw what ever it was on the stage so that was pretty funny. Nazareth, Ted Nugent, even Cheap Trick were all great , especially Nazareth. Deep Purple came out and I was preparing my ears for the torture but the sound system was the best I've ever heard before or since, it was still loud as ever but crystal clear. Steve Morse was on fire that day as were the whole band, maybe the best show I've ever seen. Skynyrd was good too
but Deep Purple that day may be the best ever.
This is a great album. Very surprised!
Yes surprisingly fresh and great musicianship
Totally with you, Pete. Id love to get as much original music out of them as possible, while they are creating it as such a high level.
Rockin pneumonia the hit of 2021
Deep Purple the first rock band to released 2 or more studio albums in 7 decades.
1960s - 3 albums
1970s - 7 albums
1980s - 2 albums
1990s - 4 albums
2000s - 2 albums
2010s - 2 albums
2020s - 2 albums or maybe more.
As far as I know, there's no other band who did this.
The Stones just fall short with single showings in 00 and 10. 20s remain to be seen. Of course, you could be including live releases, but most of these are older shows.
There's still hope for AC/DC. But they've gotta do it till the 30s. Note, I guess it was only one release in 14 and then one in 20, but technically that album was due in 19. Damn, COVID!
Rush comes close
1970s - 6 albums
1980s - 7 albums
1990s - 3 albums
2000s - 2 albums
2010s - 1 album
@UCDTPyYvR9xPRZ66--47toPQ Some hardcore Purple fans (or of any band really) will love anything they do regardless...
@@philford1730 Scorpions comes even closer:
1970's- 6 albums (Lonesome Crow; Fly to the Rainbow; In Trance; Virgin Killer; Taken by Force; Lovedrive)
1980's- 4 albums (Animal Magnetism; Blackout; Love at First Sting; Savage Amusement)
1990's- 4 albums (Crazy World; Face the Heat; Pure Instinct; Eye II Eye)
2000's- 2 albums (Unbreakable; Humanity: Hour I)
2010's- 2 albums (Sting in the Tail; Return to Forever)
Yes
1960's - 1 album
1970's - 8
1980's - 3
1990's - 5
2000's - 1
2010's - 2
2020's - 1
I am as big of a fan aof deep purple as pete is and really appreciate the honesty in this review. Good job again.
Man you hit this one right on the head, that's why I come here for your reviews, I know even when it comes to your favorite band you're not going to bulshit me...
Better give it another spin, without the ear plugs this time....😉
@@buckshroyer3219 okay I'll try it without the air plugs.... nope it's still garbage
Been a Deep Purple fan since Shades of Deep Purple. (68?) I love the new album. I’ll use every song somewhere in my playlists and have already ordered the cd.
I just listened to the entire album today. Whether it's covers or originals either way it's a great album to listen to. And it's always a joy to hear Ian's voice. I thought the cover of Peter Green's oh well was a dandy. And it was a very interesting choice of covers especially the Bob seger song. I can't wait to hear their next album and hopefully it will be original but either way it's great to hear the guys hard at work making music. 😎
I'm with you Pete, not a fan of cover albums. But, I do need to check out more Morse era Purple
Almost didn't buy the album after this review. Not a fan of rock & roll-covers and such. But then I did get a copy and am very happy with it, a real nostalgic good time rockin' affair, been playing it a lot, great record to put on when you have visitors ... familiar tunes, but new. I can understand that if you expect or want something from a band, a record like this can be disappointing. I love Dixie Chicken, going to check out Little Feat.
Very much looking forward to hearing what you think of this Pete. Haven't got my hands on it yet but it's due today or tomorrow and I can't wait! 😎
You may be disappointed (depending on how fanatical you are about this band)
So this got delayed in the mail and I managed to avoid listening to anything before it arrived, other than 7 and 7 is. It came on Tuesday and I've had a chance to listen to it a few times now. I'm a big Purple fan but genuinely enjoy the album, it sounds like Purple as in for the most part they've put their stamp on the songs and to me it's just a kind of feel good positive vibes album. I was apprehensive going into it based on it being a covers album and their awful rendition of Roadhouse Blues but overall I'm pretty happy with the album. Still want another genuine Purple album though.
I was exactly the same. Really really disappointed when hearing they were doing a covers album. But after a few days, I calmed down and realise these guys have the right to do whatever they want! You can definitely tell they had such a great time doing this. I won’t listen to it a whole lot but I have no complaints about this album any more
Not a fan of covers albums myself in most cases definitely prefer the originals, the general reception of this album however seems to be rather positive judging by comments left on the three music videos released so far. I think people are happily surprised DP still sound so good and playful, more than anything.
They recorded quite a few covers on their first three LP's.
@@vincentrathbone26 Yes they did like many/most bands in their early years, not many later on. I actually think those early covers generally speaking were pretty good. Not all cover songs are created equal, not even from the same band
Exactly, it's good to have fun in these times...could be worst...it could sound like Adele, all doom n gloom lol
Laughing out loud a couple of times for that honest face and body language! And I agree on most of the comments!
Great new look Pete
I personally love it ! Its the guys just having fun and it gets me moving :) Biased as they are my best band of all time ! Its just for fun, so why not , now what ?!
A couple of spins and it will be gathering dust next to Saxons'. Both are some of my favorite bands.
i agree with you 1000 percent Pete !!!
I love it! It’s Deep Purple! Great! 😃🎸
The album sounds excellent and in the context of COVID constraints and how they work, then it makes perfect sense. I have noticed lots of very appreciative comments and good reviews of it thus far. I expect a new album, hopefully a new double album, of all new material in either 2022 or 2023. DP have adapted wonderfully well to circumstances and continue to make a great and influential contribution. Whitesnake and Glenn Hughes both did Deep Purple covers in recent years, and it seems to me entirely valid for DP to cover songs that influenced them, and I suspect that we will now see other bands follow suit. DP continue to blaze a trail of adaptive creative thinking and approaches.
I'll give my right arm if anyone in this band was "influenced" by a novelty song like "Battle of New Orleans" but OK...We know Gillan wasn't anyway because he said none of these songs were his suggestions, all of which the band rejected (might be interesting to know what he wanted to do instead). Also can't imagine that Steve Morse picked that one because it meant something to him. The suggestion others made of this being a "money grab" might make more sense if I were taking a more negative view but I'll go along with their own explanation of this being something they did to "keep busy". But that also means these songs probably weren't an actual tribute to the included original artists either which is the usual reason for doing such an album (besides the $'s)
@@wolf1977 My sense is that most albums, in themselves, even chart successful ones, do not make money, but rather it is touring and merchandise that makes groups like DP some income. Hence, I see this album as a creative outlet in the circumstances. All DP fans want a new album of new material, and that will now follow, and I am very pleased to have this intermediate contribution from DP, and it deserves to be appreciated for what it is, rather than dismissed for what it is not.
@@dougiehall457 I think I'm seeing what this is just fine which is at best a mediocre covers album made to keep busy. The problem is that that's greatly outweighed (in a negative way unfortunately for me) by what it isn't & that's why the focus for me is on the negative aspects
@@wolf1977 there are many things you are not, do not allow that to get you down. Celebrate who you are and your good qualities.
@@dougiehall457 Is this SNL's Deep Thoughts/Jack Handey? 😃
Excellent record, not a bad track.
I m big fan of deep purple fav band
Only bought it cause I'm a fan
It's not gowing to be played again ,Peter review hits nail on the head
For hard core Purple (Steve Morse?) fans only - Actually I'm one of those & I won't be buying it so...
Pete, I had been waiting to hear your take on this album. You had been saying for weeks that you really didn't want a covers album from DP. DP is obviously one of you favorite all-time bands and you set high expectations from them. My favorite DP albums are the ones that Ian Paice plays drums on(that's all of them). Although I don't agree with you on all criticisms of all the songs, I think some of these song ideas are fun and out of left field for the band. As a singing drummer, I'm always looking for more songs for myself to cover in my bag of songs. So, the easy boogie-woogie and Blues/R&B tunes are the ones I gravitate to. Those were probably the songs the band thought would just to be fun to record in the lockdown times...and the added horns adds another texture you don't expect from Purple. I thought the strong covers on this album were basically the same ones you pointed out. The "Oh Well" cover really highlighted Morse's guitar interpretations with Airey's Hammond playing. I did love the "Dixie Chicken" cover as a Little Feat fan. I do like your suggestion to make it more of a Deep Purple version than a straight copy. Instead of Don Airey using the piano sound, he could mix in some DP sounding Hammond organ inflections throughout. Now, I felt you may have been a little unfair about their version of "Shapes of Things." When I first saw the track listing, I was hoping they would do the Jeff Beck Group version(later covered by Gary Moore w/Paicey on drums). But, they opted for the Yardbirds version instead. What I didn't notice is (on first listen) was that they switched mid-song at the guitar solo from the Yardbirds version to the Jeff Beck Group version. I probably don't hold Deep Purple to the standard that you do. I figure they've been making music their way for most of my lifetime, they can do it any way they want. Thanks for the review, Pete!
Yes they (and any band really but especially one with 50+ years of quality behind them) can do what they want but that doesn't mean we have to like or buy it. I suspect they know that and album sales & general listener feedback will tell them what people thought of the album
Yes this is pretty much what Glover said in a recent interview. Part of the inspiration for the title was not simply that they were doing covers but that some fans would immediately think it a crime that they were doing covers. He basically said they did it, it was fun and they don’t care that some people don’t like it. It is what it is - the cd is there for your pleasure or not. He said they don’t make music to cater to their fans to create a sound they think is the purple sound, but rather make a record they want to make as musicians and hopefully people will enjoy it. Purple to them isn’t just the organ sound or the Gillan screams - purple to them is whatever they make.
Spot on comment about Shapes of Things. Morse’s solo is excellent- very musical. That version is a snapshot of who Deep Purple are now.
I like the new album....but I'm an open minded Purple fan who doesn't mind the boogie woogie piano stuff or the jazzy touches, etc.
Everything Led Zeppelin did were considered cover albums, plus The Beatles did their share of covers. That being said, I think Deep Purple wanted to pay homage to some of the songs they were inspired by. It's a rock n roll album, instead of a heavy project. I don't buy albums anymore because there are no record stores near me. But I thought some of the tracks on "Turning To Crime" were quite good. Though I do not usually like cover material, this album was obviously done for Purple to have fun with a whole album of songs they didn't compose. Besides, "Roadhouse Blues" and "Kentucky Woman" were covers. I was surprised how good Purple still sound, so I think I can overlook the criticism of their one off Sha Na Na opus. If I had my wish, Ian Gillian would rejoin Sabbath for "Born Again II."
“Everything Led Zeppelin did we considered cover albums.”
Apart from 1, which was brought out as a calling card intended to capture the band’s chemistry and dynamism, I don’t think I could disagree any more.
What are you going on about? Other than their debut album, almost all of Led Zeppelin’s material is original.
Pete’s just cranking out the content lately! Anthony Fantano may have to give up his “internet’s busiest music nerd” title ;)
Im with you 100 percent on this Pete.
I am so tired of bands covering the same songs over and over. Unless they really change it and make it their own image
Which is the better covers album pick: this or Feedback by Rush?
Thanks for what seems to be a fair review and commentary of this covers album. Probably not high on my list though it will get a listen at some point. Interesting though since I came to Deep Purple way back when with their single and cover of Hush. But, if for no reason other than watching your expressions while discussing the band cover a Bob Dylan song, this episode was great.
I went to Barnes and Noble on Saturday they had the CD in stock, but were unable get it, so I had to order. I'm waiting for it to come in. I feel as though they were kind of going back to their roots with the MK1 Line-Up when they did cover songs on their first three albums. On their 'Whoosh' album they re-recorded And The Address. Thanks for the review.
(EDIT)
The album finally came in, I'm really digging their cover of 'Oh Well'
Rating: 3/5 for me
Don’t you love it you go somewhere and they say we have it in stock but we can’t get it doesn’t make much sense
@@SteveAuger2021 Bait-and-switch to get you in the door?
Lalena, Hey Joe, Help, River Deep Mountain High, Kentucky Woman ,Hush. They basically started out as a cover band. I’m loving the new lp
I rarely pick up cover albums, so I had no intention of purchasing this one. Especially after seeing the track listing. It will be the first DP release with Gillan that I don't have.
I don't have any problem with bands doing this, it's just not for me. I'm just glad they're still around.
Same here, will pass on this one. They really should've waited out COVID & used the time to write new material instead of expending time & energy on this covers album
@@wolf1977 Exactly, sitting in their own separate homes in lock down means putting out music that is easier to create - hence covers albums galore.
Sure, musicians need to earn money but my guess is that the members of UFO, Saxon and Deep Purple all have enough money already to survive a few years of "no work". This therefore smacks of greedy and cynical record companies forcing them to do these albums and, to a lesser extent, the bands themselves.
@@patrikpersson1319 get a tissue so mommy can wipe your tears
@@patrikpersson1319 If I thought that it would dry your tears and help you grow a pair, I would. Just to "get it out of my chest". lol
@@patrikpersson1319 This isn't a conversation. This is you crying (you seem to do a lot of that, typical for your subspecies) and I'm laughing. Your obsession brings me joy.
I agree
Ya Whoosh was the greatest thing I heard in a LONG time. Loved it, was hoping for another thing then I saw covers.. ohh..... hmm.....
Yes Pete, you summed it up pretty well. An whatever ho hum release.
Steve Morse used to do that medley with The Dixie Dregs. He also covered Shapes Of Things with The Dregs too. Retreading familiar ground.
I actually really enjoyed this album for what it was, something to keep them busy during the pandemic and a chanee for them to share with their fans the music they grew up on. 7 and 7 is was great, as was Oh Well, loved their rendition of Lucifer and the Medley was fun.
I totally agree with you not crazy with it not big on covers albums rather hear them do originals wish they would have them do their spin on them btw I love Lucifer early Seger kicks ass
My thoughts are exactly like that, and as Gillan said, they didn't pick any of the songs he suggested.
What did you think about Ian Gillan's singing on the album? Did it feel inspired to you?
Not inspired, I thought he sounded OK. If someone is looking for affirmation that he can still sing then you do get that here. I guess that's kinda "inspiring"...well actually more like "reassuring"
It's Ian Gillan at 76 years old...his voice is what it is and has been for about 20 years. He sounds like he's having fun, and I don't mind elder statesman Gillan at all.
@@seaoftranquilityprog I think his voice has actually held up better than McCartney's (unfortunately). Even Sir Elton is really showing his age, he's almost the same age (74) as Gillan
I gave this a spin a few nights-ago after seeing its release. I’ve always loved Deep Purple & was curious to hear how Ian’s voice was holding-up.
It wasn’t what I expected, but it was a cool listen. Very big fans will love this or hate it, I think. It’s a post-card from this weird period of history & we’ll see a lot of projects like this in the coming months.
Totally with you......bet Blackmore would have some chuckles listening to that album.
Agreed not big on covers I like an artists original material . Speaking of Ian Gillan I finally got around to checking out The Ian Gillan Band and Gillan. Pete your not kidding when you said it is some really great material that sadly didn't get the attention it deserves. Bought 3 of the albums today and plan on getting the whole catalog of Gillan and Ian Gillan band.
I absolutely love the Gillan track "Angel Manchenio", I guess it's somewhat of an unknown song from Clear Air Turbulence
I think the covers album is a bonus because they haven’t been touring. It doesn’t mean they haven’t got some new stuff in the can ready for next year.
Although it’s not up with their last three albums, I think it’s pretty good.
If they're working on new stuff (or even if they're not) I would've totally been OK with waiting for that new album. The arguments made by many that "something from them is better than nothing" seems to assume that the band has to release something every so often. Why? That's along the lines of quantity is better than quality, a camp to which I don't ascribe. Also usually bands release albums so that: 1) They can sell them for lots of $'s & 2) They can tour those songs for lots of $'s. COVID took away option #2 so the cynic would say it was mostly a money grab. The band said it was to stay busy during COVID...Also usually cover records are made to pay tribute but I don't buy that here (especially if you accept their explanation which I do). I think it's best to accept this for what it is & either buy it or not, then move on. I think the next one'll be much better...
Well, musically I'd agree with you 90%. I mean I love Let the Good Time Roll, I think Mr. Gillan's voice and performance on it was superb.
But the thing is, I cannot build any opinion about any Deep Purple work, only on musical level. It has to be a little bit personal too.
For me, Deep Purple sounds like they are sharing some private moments with me in this album, while they're having a blast doing it, and for me, this is more than enough to enjoy this songs.
But musically speaking, 7 and 7 is, is a great cover, and it's easily could've been a Purple song.
Rockin' Pneumonia and the Boogie Woogie Flu, usually I don't prefer this kind of songs if not for a very little thing Mr. Airey done with his piano here.
Oh Well .... just magnificent ... when I first read that this is gonna be on the new Purple covers album, I imagine it being performed by Deep Purple and I thought that's great, it could be sound like it was really written by Purple. when I first listened to the song it was not as I imagine it, but it was great, and I enjoy it more actually.
Jenny Take a Ride! and Watching the River Flow ... I'm not a big fan
Let the Good Times Roll .. I just love it ... it's not a song that you can imagine Purple play ... maybe it's more of Ian Paice thing .. it's just I was amazed by Gillan's voice in this song.
Dixie Chicken ... not a fan too
Shapes of Things, and White Room ... I wish they chose other songs ... maybe Politician would've sound great with them.
The Battle of New Orleans, I like it ... it's fun.
Lucifer, one of the best tracks in the album.
Caught in the Act ... for me this is the weakest thing in the album.
Overall ... anything from Deep Purple is very dear to me.
Love Lucifer. I like the medley. Green Onions alone is almost worth the price of admission
Pete, I usually agree with you. Not this time. I thoroughly enjoy this album from start to finish. It’s total fun, the playing is top notch, and the sound quality is excellent.
Agree with you on this one. These guys have taken me on a musical journey for decades and this is just one more fascinating piece of music they are sharing.
Yup ... fair review ... bang on ... and shows why subscribing to a streaming service is ok ... I use Qoboz which, when combined with an external USB DAC, allows me to put the headphones on and to listen to brand new albums in HiRes quality before making a judgement call to buy a physical copy ... the subsription more than pays for itself in avoiding spending cash on duds like this ... and I am a fan of the band. I listened to Doobie Brothers Liberte (superb) before getting the CD ... ditto re David Crosby, Pink Floyd remix of Momentary Lapse of Reason, Bob Dylan's great Springtime in New York, etc. (Gotta love Bob ... but he does have his share of dudsctoo) ... I love having a physical copy but if you can try (in high resolution) before you buy it's a great (no brainer) option ... and it's also great to spend a couple of hours each week checking out new releases that you'd otherwise never try ... and I can check out all the SoT recommendations too ...
I'm a big Purple fan of all line ups but I hesitated to buy this one. A friend is an even bigger fan and called it a piece of crap. I don't know if its that bad but I agree their last 3 releases were stellar . On another note thanks for the recommendation on the Billy Gibbons and Styx ,I bought them on vinyl and agree some of the best releases this past year.
This comment is from someone who stopped digging what DP was doing from around about 1993 onwards - just watched the video of 7 and 7 is, there's great energy in the performances of all (but it's obvious there's some "studio body" being added to Gillan's voice) - I might try to download their version of "Watchin' the River Flow" - always liked that Dylan song and Gillan's far more limited vocal capabilities (compared to his prime in the 1970s) should make for an interesting cover as Dylan - a great song writer - was able to render the lyrics pretty well despite his vocal limitations !!??!!
Bassist Roger Glover made his vocal debut on this new Purple album...with, "The Battle of New Orleans." Also, the album cover has a nice texture to it. I guess Pete, didn't think those were worthy of a mention. Nonetheless, a cool album for waiting on the next Purple platter.
That’s what makes this album so effective- the variety of songs. When I listened to the original before I heard Purples version I was like ‘geeze’ , but it fits right in with the mix of songs
Didn't realise it was Roger, thought it might have been Steve as he's the American one and would have fitted nicely with the them.
The Battle is a great song..in fact one of the best songs..Glover n Gillan blend well!
What's ironic. At the same time DP released this, The Temperance Movement released their "Covers & Rarities" album, which included a cover of DP's "You Fool No One" with Ian Paice on drums.
Agree with you 100 0/0 Won't get played to many times in my house
Can you tour a cover album?
You can tour anything as long as you pay the royalty fees for playing someone else's music. As to what kinds of venues you can fill by doing that is a different question...
@@wolf1977 a best of tour with someone else's music.lol
@@roberttolbert7002 Maybe they can tour a "best of Motown", I dunno 🤷♂️
Rod Stewart did.
@@phillipanderson7398 he also did good songs
I can see solo artist doing it.
I don't know if a band could pull it off .
The one positive for cover albums is it might turn you on to the original artist..I had never heard "7+7 Is" before...
I’ve heard the Alice Cooper and the Rush versions however never heard the original.
This is a question about a different kind of cover, does Ian Paice wear a wig? I remember pictures from come taste the band and his hair was really frizzy looking? Pretty sure Blackmore wears one. Just curious.
Ian Paice played on “Shapes” for Gary Moore!
I agree with what Tee C and others below have said. Their comments are all valid, honest and admirable. But if you sweep away all the dried raisins, we're still not left with enough bran to fill a tiny cup. It's not so much that it's a covers album, as I have no issue with covers in general, but it's more the tracks they chose to cover that makes on question "what criteria did they use in selecting the tracks?" Is it band member favorites from over the years? Tracks in the public domain? Selections by contest winners who voted? (I know - ridiculous)? They could do another one and it wouldn't bother me at all; I might even love it. But if they a cover of anything by Neil Sedaka.....
The most interesting thing about this album, is finally seeing Roger Glover without a bandana around his bald head...
I agree with you a hundred on that record. The difference is that I could only listen twice to it.
Funny. Thanks Pete. You do have to wonder what they were thinking covering tracks that have been done to death.
Easy money
Used to be called Vanilla Fudge
Am quite enjoying this. Of course I'd much rather hear original stuff, but if they'd done one so quickly after Whoosh I doubt it'd been very good. So...I'd rather have this now than not have this at all, if that makes sense. Airey and Morse are playing great throughout.
Your contention seems to be that they needed to do some kind of album NOW...Why?
@@wolf1977 a) because they wanted to and were probably bored in lock down b) they're still alive (not to be taken for granted at their age). What the fans want always should be secondary to an artist.
@@arto2533 No not asking whey the BAND would want to do it but why YOU feel that they need to release an album of covers since as you say you'd much rather have them do originals. So to YOU what would've been wrong with them waiting a few more months & releasing that (most likely) much better record? I love Purple & Morse but I would've been totally fine with never hearing this one...
I think at least part of the reason for musicians making albums is for their fans, I wouldn't totally discount that. Sure they can release whatever they want & we the fans can buy it or not. We're criticizing something here that's already been released so it's not like we get a vote as to whether this album ever comes out or not, that ship has sailed. This is feedback for the band, they can listen to it or not, also the $'s resulting from sales will tell them something...
@@wolf1977 No, I said i'd "rather have this than not have it" since I enjoy it to some degree. Never said I really needed a new Purple album now or ever. And calling fans' expectations secondary is hardly "totally discounting" them. Focus a bit on what's actually being written and meant instead of twisting everything. There is really nothing to argue about here. It seems to be a somewhat polarizing work, as it was always going to be regardless of the quality of it.
@@arto2533 I'm totally focusing on what you actually wrote, like "rather have this than not have it" - doesn't that mean you'd rather have anything from them than nothing even if you prefer new material? If that's not what you meant to say (I'm not a mindreader) then you didn't write what you meant, or at least didn't write it well. Maybe a better way to put it might have been: "I'd rather have a new album of new material but since I like at least some of these covers I'm OK with this album too" - or something similar. You did also write "if this makes sense" & I guess to me it doesn't...
When you say "What the fans want always should be secondary to an artist" that to me means that whatever they want to put out goes, which of course is true, but ignores that at least part of the reason musicians make music is for the fans and so it can and should also be at least a minor factor in what a band records/releases. You didn't mention that aspect which is why I did...
" it was always going to be (polarizing) regardless of the quality of it" - NO! Sure all albums regardless of quality will be disliked by some, the difference here is the sheer number of dislikes which should tell you something (which is that most don't like it) & that's the point. That really has nothing to do with whether you or I think they should've made it in the first place, which is what we're discussing here. If it were then no albums would ever be released...
What makes Purple die-hard fans so unique (to me) is the strength of their opinions about this band, it's really something (just read the posts re: the non-Blackmore versions of Purple for a little taste). They remind me of Kiss fans, though totally different music & their fanaticism isn't even totally music-based, in their tenacity to defend their band at all costs. Someone here suggested that those of us who don't like this album are doing so out of some sort of personal attack or hatred of the band (which it's not) & I actually see the opposite, that those who do like it are often in attack mode like they need to defend the band for some reason & you're frankly starting to come off that way too. Same thing happened when Wolfgang Van Halen's first album came out & Van Halen fans attacked those of us who didn't think much of that record...
Instead, accept that this was a "COVID project to keep busy" as the band said, like this album or don't, buy it or don't, wait for the next album that'll undoubtedly be better than this one & contain original songs, and be happy. It's that simple 👍Frankly any time a band tells me that their new album was made "to keep busy" that doesn't bode well for me ultimately liking it, but I'll still listen to it to decide
I quite liked the songs I never knew to well and wasn’t enthused by the more popular songs. As always the musicianship is amazing. Ian Paice stands out and Gillan is singing better than he has in a decade. Hope they can capture this energy and rock it up for the next album of original songs.
The Dylan cover is fantastic, such an interesting choice for them, but it works for me, I think it’s one of the best songs on the album. By the look of your face Pete, it is because of your dislike for Dylan, you just can’t get past that. I like 7 and 7 Is, Oh Well and Lucifer are my other favs.
Gotta respectfully disagree. I love Dylan, and was excited to hear their version. The original is just a mid tempo folk country thing that doesn’t do anything for me. Purple’s version is…mid temp folk country with a different vocalist. I don’t get it.
@@joewilson1584 I love the piano and slide guitar a lot in the Purple version as well as Gillian’s vocals.
The slide is nice
@@teec3557 Best ever slide guitar on any Purple record? Tommy Bolin on come Taste The Band, I know many die-hards will disagree (also happens to be my fave Purple album). Come to think of it did Blackmore even play slide much, especially with Purple? He wasn't really known for his slide playing
Come Taste the Band - the most underrated and overlooked Purple album. Top 5 for me.
Lord said it wasn’t a Purple album but it was a damn good album. I never understood why he said that - I had no problem accepting it as a Purple album
Regarding Bon Dylan: Gillan has actually said that none of his suggestions made it on the record
Well then at least he's off the hook in picking "Battle of New Orleans", a truly weird pick
@@wolf1977 It‘s kinda funny though, also with Glover singing. I loved it a bit more than the whole blues stuff on the record but it‘s not even nearly as good as 7 And 7 Is, Oh Well, Lucifer and White Room (I know they didn‘t change a lot on this one but it kinda always specifically reminded me of DP/Uriah Heep anyway)
Wow didn’t realize you were so rigid with regard to Purple. Always loved when DP ventures outside their comfort zone and away from ‘their sound’. Love watching listening to them stretch themselves and display their musicianship. Absolutely great album - will listen to this one many times do to the variety. Also one thing you fail to mention- the damn underlying power of some of these songs leave the originals in the dust.
This is a fun great album
I have a question about a different kind of cover, does Ian Paice wear a wig ? I remember pictures from come taste the band and hair was really frizzy . Pretty sure Blackmore wear one.
I love a good covers album and I loved this one.
I quite agree with you I got hundreds of c.d of cover albums by famous bands all sounding the same and unless they put their own spin on it it’s boring.keep them new albums coming Pete it great to hear your views bye🤣
I can understand the covers argument, but we can't deny that Gillan is struggling with his vocal. Many tracks, I feel, are suited to his lesser range and are well performed.
After having many an enjoyable experience with Whoosh ! I was particularly impressed with And the Address.. thinking.. wouldn't it be nice to do a homage to their original line up, as I feel that Nick and Rod were poorly treated back then, when they made some fine songs.
And the Address
Hush
The Shield
Chasing Shadows
Emeretta
Hey Joe
------------
Wring that Neck
Mandrake Root
The Bird has Flown
Kentucky Woman
April
This would make a real appreciation for the ever present Mr. Paice, too.. and I'm sure that they could have a lot of fun making it.
Great post, Pete 👍
Do you always keep everything even if you know you’ll never listen to it again?
Where would you put this album in their discography ranking?
#1 ...in the DP cover album department. :) Other than that, it's a little too early for ranKings isn't it?
I think you have to understand that these guys have been living in isolation for the past couple of years like the rest of us. I don't think they had much opportunity for any kind of writing sessions.
I think they sound great. Reminds me of Rush’s feedback; they’re just having fun and sometimes you need to hear your bands do that. Cool mix of songs, too!
To me Rush's covers album is much better, better songs too (2 of the tracks are the same but even those are covered better on the Rush album)
@@wolf1977 Well, Rush is a far better band :)
@@Mattomega OK...
@@Mattomega Very different bands, hard to compare them...
@@LarryFleetwood8675 Of course, but when Purple is playing Little Feat, I think it's fair to compare anything where a classic rock band does a covers record :)
One positive I’m hoping comes from this album is when they write another original album, playing other bands stuff may free them up a bit and get more ideas flowing. Just a thought 🤷♂️
I think that this is an album that I would have enjoyed watching Deep Purple put this album together in a studio more than listening to the finished album. It's fun watching the Beatles goof around in the studio just to have fun. It would have been fun hearing the boys just have fun.
It depends on how well or even original a bands covers are. Halestorm for instance does a great job. Sometime even better than the original. Another excellent cover album is Rush's Feedback.
I tend to like cover albums, 2 that come to mind are Queensryche and Yngwie's but not so sure about this one as I didn't recognize any of the songs you mentioned.
'Lazy' is all the boogie we need from Deep Purple. 🤗
Great track, actually wouldn't mind more "boogie" from Purple if it sounded like that!
The last Deep Purple I bought was " Perfect Strangers " .
Try some of the new ones, like Whoosh! If it’s because Ritchie isn’t there anymore that ship has sailed.
@@adkleiner Is Lord , Glover and Paice still in the band ?
Now what!? for me absolutely comparable to Perfect Strangers qualitywise
@@s.9070 Im glad Deep Purple is still making albums ........I have no desire whatsoever to hear their new albums. .......blow
@@s.9070 Im glad Deep Purple is still making albums ........I have no desire whatsoever to hear their new albums. .......blow
Heard in interview that since they couldn't get together in the studio and write organically like usually ... they did this .. so ...
Sounds like more of an excuse to soften the blow for those of us who end up listening to it (or actually buying it) instead of an explanation. You might ask them: "If you have to get together to record & you didn't see each other during COVID then how'd you record this one? If you did it remotely then why not remotely record a new album containing new songs?". I've read that they're "working on" new material meaning it isn't all done, so I take that as the primary reason why this was a covers album
Pete giving it the big sales pitch !
I've listened on Prime. Meh...I'm with you Pete. Give me some more original material!!
Pete there is more to like then to dislike... Ian's scream may be gone but his mid range singing voice is sounding better then the last few albums. A fun listen reminds me a little bit of the Rush "Feedback" album. My only complaint would be they should have done the full version of "Dazed and Confused"
Yeah, as an album probably hit and miss. Remember though, these are old guys who like everyone have been in lockdown. Recording remotely for Deep Purple is an alien concept, so to write new material in a relatively short window was unlikely. A group of mates and stellar musicians having fun ys what this is. You can clearly hear Gillan solo album styles alongside Steve Morse infused tunes. Lucifer, like Pete says is as close to Purple as it gets.
PS. Reading Festival 1983 still haunts me to this day - "Deep Sabbath" (or "Black Purple") on stage with Ian Gillan singing "Paranoid" and Tonny Iommi doing the riff to "Smoke On The Water"... I still feel very confused now, almost 40 years later.
Good thing then that Iommi didn't join Purple back in the 90's instead of Morse! 👍
@@wolf1977 Don't get me wrong, it was a good gig and I also like the "Born Again" album, in it's own way. But that still didn't make it any less "weird" when watching them live on stage.