How Close Are We to a Self-Driving World?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 30 окт 2024

Комментарии • 1,2 тыс.

  • @Seeker
    @Seeker  5 лет назад +82

    Hey Seekers! You can read more about the evolution of Tesla’s autopilot features here: electrek.co/guides/tesla-autopilot/. These DO make use of ultrasound and radar, just not LIDAR, a controversial stance in the industry (and this research points to why: arxiv.org/pdf/1708.09839.pdf).
    As user daniel munoz pointed out in the comments, most recently, they unveiled their ‘Enhanced Summon’ feature, where you just tap a button on your phone and your car can autonomously “fetch” itself back to you from a crowded parking lot: www.cnbc.com/2019/04/09/tesla-rolling-out-enhance-summon-feature-car-drives-itself-to-you.html 🤯
    What do you think? Is Tesla going to make “fetch” happen?

    • @thebradmarkschannel957
      @thebradmarkschannel957 5 лет назад +21

      @@bruhweexist It's a great point. You could listen to a 5 minute clip of Elon Musk and have a much better idea about what's going on.

    • @Triality
      @Triality 5 лет назад +28

      @@bruhweexist Agreed, I usually like Seeker video's but this one is a biased uninformed load.

    •  5 лет назад +19

      Love how we're ok with humans driving with a pair of eyes that jump all over the place and perceive only a tiny section of the surroundings at any given moment, but a multitude of cameras continuously monitoring every side of the vehicle aren't enough... 🧐

    • @bradz9413
      @bradz9413 5 лет назад

      Track name please!!! Thanks!!

    • @jeffnewcomb601
      @jeffnewcomb601 5 лет назад +17

      @@bruhweexist My feelings are similar to yours, but I can see why Tesla was not a comprehensive part of this video, and other videos/news stories: They're currently classed as level 2, and while you and I can see the writing on the wall, media people classically do not. One day, when a Tesla is "200% or 300% safer than a human," Musk will flip a switch and only then will they scratch their heads and wonder why they didn't see it coming...

  • @danielmunoz5779
    @danielmunoz5779 5 лет назад +544

    The whole comment stating that Elon only believes cameras are necessary is extremely misleading the way it’s used. Teslas use ultrasonic sensors and radar as well. Also they have achieved level 3 on highways and with enhanced summon the vehicle can pick you up in a parking lot on its own. To be fair these are recent which is why they may have not been included in the video.

    • @Dragonblood94
      @Dragonblood94 5 лет назад +10

      Level 3 means no observation is needed. If you dont monitor the Tesla Autopilot you are dead very quickly.

    • @YR2050
      @YR2050 5 лет назад +61

      @@Dragonblood94 Wrong. Level 3 you still have to take over during emergency.

    • @larryspiller15
      @larryspiller15 5 лет назад +46

      @@Dragonblood94 your thinking level 4.

    • @Dragonblood94
      @Dragonblood94 5 лет назад +4

      Sorry guys. lvl3 is you have to take over during emergency but you dont have to observe. The car tells you when to take over. And when it tells you, you have ca 10 seconds time. The car bears responsibility part time.
      In Tesla only the driver is responsible therefore Level 2 or ADAS.

    • @PaperDragons
      @PaperDragons 5 лет назад +42

      This video dismisses Telsa. Elon stated last week that with the existing hardware, the cars they make today would be able to be self-driving level 4 by the end of 2019. Now that means probably the end of 2020 but still, look at ALL the people who dismissed Elon Musk and his companies.

  • @gvibanhez1
    @gvibanhez1 5 лет назад +150

    Wow, 20+ years ago a dude already did it!!! Mind blowing!

    • @Seeker
      @Seeker  5 лет назад +16

      Right?! Dean and Todd's account of their trip is still online here: www.cs.cmu.edu/~tjochem/nhaa/Journal.html. The internet was just a fledgling back in those days, so NHAA's was one of the world's first travel blogs! 🐣✈️

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад +2

      @VACCINATE YOUR KIDS ALREADY!
      The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities!

    • @moneymotivationmadness3275
      @moneymotivationmadness3275 5 лет назад +2

      Autonomous vehicles have been around for close to thirty years on private mapped out tracks. The difficulty is human interaction.

    • @mattgeiger9988
      @mattgeiger9988 5 лет назад +1

      So in 20 years little change. Maybe it's a bad idea

    • @jackthorton10
      @jackthorton10 5 лет назад

      No one went out of their way to make the most impossible thing possible by simply just taking it slow, if you rested you’re better off spending your money elsewhere

  • @cinosxx
    @cinosxx 5 лет назад +392

    Level 6: Replacement - self-driving cars replace you and do all your work for you
    Level 7: Dominance - they are sentient and start to get rid of useless humanity

    • @NeorecnamorceN
      @NeorecnamorceN 5 лет назад +77

      Which is the origin story for the movie Cars.

    • @fanOmry
      @fanOmry 5 лет назад

      Cars

    • @maxkho00
      @maxkho00 5 лет назад

      Omg I'm dying 😂

    • @HardKore5250
      @HardKore5250 5 лет назад

      Level 5 is the highest lol

    • @maxkho00
      @maxkho00 5 лет назад +1

      @@HardKore5250 ISSA JOK.

  • @pseudonymity0000
    @pseudonymity0000 5 лет назад +111

    "Cameras struggle with darkness, depth and reflections."
    errr.
    When it comes to darkness, Yes, cheep ones have a problem, like in a smart phone. But self-driveing cars would more likely be equipped with low to mid range DSLR grade sensors.
    Also, what you are looking at when it comes to darkness is ISO. A high ISO can handle dark conditions better with the addition of noise.
    To a photographer, noise does not look good. But to a computer, It does not care if it looks good, it just wants useable data, and a moderate amount of noise can easily be ignored by an AI.
    The depth problem is simple. Two cameras and boom, depth perception.
    As for reflections, An AI can easily learn what a reflection is. based on how the world is being projected from the object, or by having an IR and RGB camera combo. The IR camera will also help in dark conditions as well.

    • @pilotavery
      @pilotavery 5 лет назад +9

      This ^^
      Just like humans see reflections but know how to ignore them, the AI should be able to use a couple cameras and learn to ignore reflections.
      Imagine if humans had a pair of eyes at the front, middle, and back, facing all directions.

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад +5

      @@pilotavery The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities! Anywhere where there is too much spending, thats where the disruption will happen.

    • @Spark_Plug17
      @Spark_Plug17 5 лет назад +2

      Your comment need more likes!!

    • @chaossynergy9768
      @chaossynergy9768 5 лет назад +4

      Yeah, cameras struggle with darkness, depth and reflection. Like... eyeballs, which humans use to drive. So the whole comment about cameras was stupid. I'm pretty sure we can make artificial visual sensors which would be better than human eyes. It's a bit more difficult if we want to fit them inside human eyeballs and use them as eye replacement, not as difficult if it's a bunch of sensors stuck to a car. The A.I. is advancing together with hardware, with more advanced, better A.I. weaker cameras can replace high quality sensors with similar efficiency.

  • @YR2050
    @YR2050 5 лет назад +210

    Tesla is doing it so differently from everyone else. Outsiders are so clueless about where they are at, but Tesla owners including myself knows they are way ahead of Waymo (of which only works in 1 city).
    Last time I went to airport, 3 hours round trip, I'd say my active driving was less than 5 minutes, everything else is done with no input to the car.

    • @Triality
      @Triality 5 лет назад +51

      Yeah this video completely disregards Tesla and is either biased or just uninformed.

    • @Mooshimoca
      @Mooshimoca 5 лет назад +11

      yeah thought they would mention that tesla is practically level 3

    • @Gnefitisis
      @Gnefitisis 5 лет назад +4

      What I wonder is what does it mean partial input. How do you know you need to input control? Does it beep or something?

    • @OneManOnFire
      @OneManOnFire 5 лет назад +3

      As someone who works on Self driving cars myself. We use the same radar systems but with lidar. If you saw what a radar image of a human jaywalker looked like vs radar I wouldn't trust Tesla's system. I have co-workers with auto pilot and the reaction time while fast isn't as fast as ours especially in direct sunlight.

    • @0705301
      @0705301 5 лет назад +2

      @@OneManOnFire wow thats great! Looking forward to see the companies tech that you work with, in 10+ years time or so...

  • @shehulsuratwala2684
    @shehulsuratwala2684 5 лет назад +113

    Not enough coverage on Tesla Autopilot features. One of the best in market at comparatively affordable price!!

    • @PaperDragons
      @PaperDragons 5 лет назад +17

      This video dismisses Telsa. Elon stated last week that with the existing hardware, the cars they make today would be able to be self-driving level 4 by the end of 2019. Now that means probably the end of 2020 but still

    • @josephelston4101
      @josephelston4101 5 лет назад +4

      Yeah lots of misleading statements regarding Tesla here, also, what happened to Amy Teitel and the camp guy?! Something you're not telling us Seeker...!?!

    • @sickbailey21
      @sickbailey21 5 лет назад

      @@josephelston4101 is that the amy from vintage space? If so, she just finished writing her book and came back to doing youtube last week

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад +1

      @@PaperDragons The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities! Anywhere where there is too much spending, thats where the disruption will happen.

  • @RodyDavis
    @RodyDavis 5 лет назад +159

    I love how they perceive waymo as the leader and not Tesla who has way more miles driven

    • @bradhaaf4749
      @bradhaaf4749 5 лет назад +17

      Ya i think Elon said something like "out of the 407,000 cars collecting data 400,000 are teslas"

    • @lukealdrich
      @lukealdrich 5 лет назад +16

      And feeding them into their AI system which studies how humans drive, which they also failed to mention...

    • @BXJ-mi9mm
      @BXJ-mi9mm 5 лет назад +4

      Tesla isn't the leader. They are just the most "cool" and reckless one.

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад

      @@bradhaaf4749 The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities!

    • @TobiLobi
      @TobiLobi 5 лет назад +12

      @@BXJ-mi9mm You are definetely not really deep in the matter. Tesla IS definetely ahead of Chryslers cruise control. Waymo on the other hand has everything mapped out where the car can drive and even then can't make a proper turn.

  • @thorboy666
    @thorboy666 5 лет назад +431

    I want a self driving body in which I sleep for 24 hours.

    • @dailywebmoments
      @dailywebmoments 5 лет назад +3

      hmmm

    • @foxto100
      @foxto100 5 лет назад +63

      so death?

    • @metric85
      @metric85 5 лет назад +5

      Go to cemetary then

    • @p.kay_____
      @p.kay_____ 5 лет назад +7

      Get a humanoid robot and sleep at home 😁

    • @maxkho00
      @maxkho00 5 лет назад +4

      @GamingTV Which is basically the entire human population in 100 years.

  • @kenschmiesing4442
    @kenschmiesing4442 5 лет назад +261

    Extra hour of sleep... Lol. It is going to be replaced with an extra hour of your job

    • @PARCE93
      @PARCE93 5 лет назад +13

      Ken Schmiesing Right? They’ll probably have you clock in the moment you get in your car

    • @igabobalushi
      @igabobalushi 5 лет назад +4

      Nah, shes talking about sleeping in your car

    • @kenschmiesing4442
      @kenschmiesing4442 5 лет назад +11

      @@igabobalushi that is what I mean. I already will be on conference calls driving into work. Automation would just allow me to pop open the laptop and work on my way to work

    • @kenschmiesing4442
      @kenschmiesing4442 5 лет назад +2

      @@benjeesilv1596 not sure what you mean. I would get in the car to get to the office. Not everything can be done remote

    • @koloth5139
      @koloth5139 5 лет назад +4

      Depends entirely on your job. No wage earners will be working in the car the advantage of wage pay is the work day ends. Salaried employees are expected to work on demand so yea you will be working.

  • @martinfreire6733
    @martinfreire6733 5 лет назад +56

    Tesla, the greatest fleet of cars with the greatest sets of data, with new custom TPUs for their exact cars. And only gets a quote about the cameras. Poor research

    • @AshishAwaghad
      @AshishAwaghad 5 лет назад +5

      I downvoted the video for this very reason.

    • @moneymotivationmadness3275
      @moneymotivationmadness3275 5 лет назад +3

      Waymo obviously sponsored and is 5-10 years behind Tesla

    • @Jonifico
      @Jonifico 5 лет назад

      Typical Seeker research. They are very poor at that.

  • @carlosboterosuarez7027
    @carlosboterosuarez7027 5 лет назад +80

    Humans only have 2 cameras (eyes) and if skilled, are very effective in avoiding collisions. Teslas also have ultrasonic sensors and have the most data with autopilot. This video is clearly biased against tesla

    • @redfalconsmdx
      @redfalconsmdx 5 лет назад +9

      And level 4 autonomy comming the end of 2019

    • @qncsc
      @qncsc 5 лет назад +1

      Tesla is ... way way out on the fringe. If you watched the video that is obvious.

    • @redfalconsmdx
      @redfalconsmdx 5 лет назад +9

      @@qncsc , we can't say for sure but they do have quite a lot of data for various driving situation and they are already implementing hardware capable of level 4 autonomy to the recent cars. Software might be comming by the end of 2019

    • @spiitztravsky6333
      @spiitztravsky6333 5 лет назад +9

      @tommy aronson Assume it is better. Most humans have two eyes, can only focus on one point at a time, and see in a narrow light spectrum. Tesla's have up to 8 cameras, radar, and ultrasound. This is connected to the world's most advanced computer for autonomous driving that can process 2000fps at full resolution on all cameras with the ability to focus on dozens of points simultaneously. This creates invaluable data that is collected over their neural net for ML whenever we drive on Autopilot. These simple sensors combined with ML is all that is required for full autonomy that is "safer" than humans. What Waymo is doing will take much much longer but will eventually be "safer" than a Tesla.... in the areas they work. Until then my Tesla drives me home today.

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад +1

      @@redfalconsmdx The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities!

  • @deepSea__
    @deepSea__ 5 лет назад +24

    I feel like when self driving cars come to be, more people will not have cars. Things like uber and lyft will be cheaper.

    • @spiitztravsky6333
      @spiitztravsky6333 5 лет назад

      Self driving uber and lyft lol?

    • @mmafan2223
      @mmafan2223 5 лет назад

      The future is lyft and uber having autonomous cars. There will be no more human "professional" drivers. Other than race car drivers. LOL

  • @JuBBeRwoCk
    @JuBBeRwoCk 5 лет назад +17

    Your comment about Elon Musk is incorrect. He also uses RADAR for the things you mentioned as downsides. LIDAR has a big issues with bad weather so it will never be 100% autonomous. By the end of 2021 we will see Tesla's approach and maybe change your mind.

  • @andrasbiro3007
    @andrasbiro3007 5 лет назад +47

    Nice, how the guy around 3:30 listed everyone, except Tesla, the the leader in the field.

    • @iridium8562
      @iridium8562 5 лет назад +10

      Ikr, he mentioned BMW and Mercedes, they're behind Tesla in this technology, yet he ignored it.
      Pretty biased, ofc.

    • @alexhein6054
      @alexhein6054 5 лет назад

      Cuz Tesla already made it before all those brands. No need to mention Tesla again

    • @EwanMcGreggor
      @EwanMcGreggor 5 лет назад

      @tommy aronson Still Tesla.

    • @andrasbiro3007
      @andrasbiro3007 5 лет назад +2

      @@alexhein6054
      That's the main reason to start the list with Tesla. He didn't just said a few examples, he listed every single company, except Tesla. That tells a lot.

    • @andrasbiro3007
      @andrasbiro3007 5 лет назад +3

      @tommy aronson
      That's because everyone else choose the easy root that is a dead end. Tesla develops a system that works everywhere all the time with cheap cameras only. Others rely on expensive and unreliable lidar and very detailed maps that are hard to create.
      Tesla's other advantage is the billions of miles of data from real drivers, that's priceless and can't be matched by anyone else.

  • @gurumage9555
    @gurumage9555 5 лет назад +40

    This technology would only get better with more data from drivers...
    Tesla may actually win this way before waymo

    • @Mooshimoca
      @Mooshimoca 5 лет назад +2

      and have a lot more cars than waymo so people can utilize the technology a lot more

    • @kevo212
      @kevo212 5 лет назад +5

      Guru Mage yeah I don’t get how Waymo is the leader. Are they closer than Tesla? I haven’t seen any Waymo vehicles driving around here in Cali. I seen thousands of Teslas that are driving around in autopilot though.

    • @spiitztravsky6333
      @spiitztravsky6333 5 лет назад +2

      @tommy aronson It does when data is the key. For example, try to give the data to the best person you can imagine to use it for ML. Oh wait you can't. You don't have the data.

  • @Emadze
    @Emadze 5 лет назад +210

    I like the direction seeker has taken so far. Keep it up 👍

    • @sethwho7913
      @sethwho7913 5 лет назад

      Only downside will be elimination of truck drivers in the future

    • @marsbase3729
      @marsbase3729 5 лет назад

      @@sethwho7913 also bus drivers and cab drivers

    • @maxmouche
      @maxmouche 5 лет назад +1

      Me too. I wish they wouldn't use people with some of the worst vocal fry on the planet. I love the content but I frankly struggle to watch an entire video without my ears bleeding...

    • @iridium8562
      @iridium8562 5 лет назад +1

      @@maxmouche their videos are biased

    • @randomperson2348
      @randomperson2348 5 лет назад

      I wish they still had Trace😩

  • @tramsgar
    @tramsgar 5 лет назад +120

    (don't mention tesla cause they didn't pay for it)

    • @MrBetaJacques
      @MrBetaJacques 5 лет назад +12

      what ? where are you getting this from ? @tommy aronson

    • @EwanMcGreggor
      @EwanMcGreggor 5 лет назад +8

      @tommy aronson I think you're stuck at level 3, in development years. Also its TESLA.

    • @EdNieThePianoGuy
      @EdNieThePianoGuy 5 лет назад +4

      Guys...calm down. Each company has their own pros and cons to handling self-driving cars. Looking at things objectively; Tesla's AI has a bunch of data, but hasn't reached level 4 or 5. Waymo and others haven't attained as much data, but have reached level 4. Who's the best? Who cares...

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад

      @tommy aronson The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities!

    • @davidjensen6215
      @davidjensen6215 5 лет назад +7

      @tommy aronson check out the Tesla Autonomy Day event ;-)

  • @elyakimlev
    @elyakimlev 5 лет назад +87

    Tesla already has level 3 autonomy on highways (requires driver to only intervene in emergencies) without using LiDAR. The car even passes slow cars on the road by itself.
    With the rate their AI is collecting data (100,000s of cars on the road), they most likely will be the first to achieve full autonomy. Waymo and Cruise have a limited number of test drivers on the road.
    Besides, achieving 95% autonomy with LiDAR is easy. There are dozens of startups doing that. Achieving the last 5% is the tricky part. LiDAR is limited in its capability.
    I'm with Elon on this - better to do it the hard way, slowly getting more and more autonomy.

    • @christianbowen6759
      @christianbowen6759 5 лет назад +1

      great comment.

    • @RandomGuyOnTheWeb
      @RandomGuyOnTheWeb 5 лет назад +1

      Can you provide a link/source that states that Tesla takes over the responsibility for monitoring the driving situation (level 3)?

    • @hypermangi8265
      @hypermangi8265 5 лет назад

      IT'S FAXX!

    • @EwanMcGreggor
      @EwanMcGreggor 5 лет назад +1

      @tommy aronson tell that to google.

    • @elyakimlev
      @elyakimlev 5 лет назад +3

      @tommy aronson "Check the news"? I've been following Tesla for almost 3 years. Believe me, I'm fully aware of their progress. Why don't you check their latest Navigate on Autopilot feature and tell me what's missing for what seems to be essentially level 3 autonomy on highways?

  • @overclockeverything2310
    @overclockeverything2310 5 лет назад +30

    So if A.I. drove a BMW would it learn it doesn't need to use blinkers?

    • @yeahh2085
      @yeahh2085 5 лет назад +3

      Inside car enthusiast joke 😂😂

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад

      @@yeahh2085 The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities! Anywhere where there is too much spending, thats where the disruption will happen.

    • @hectorvega621
      @hectorvega621 5 лет назад

      @@actualfactual8737 What do mean by Free Market?

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад

      @@hectorvega621 There are documentarys on this...if you cant find them anymote on youtube...try vimeo. You want to live? You gotta pay.

    • @hectorvega621
      @hectorvega621 5 лет назад +1

      @@actualfactual8737 Funny though it was Free Markets that helped at some point Create an Oil Industrial Monopoly. It's more that Regulations have failed do to Government having lack of good Politicians. There was a time, but his long dead, and long has that election has pass. 1912 I believe, Theodore Roosevelt if the party didn't split and he won the nomination, We could have seen the Potential of an Amendment to ban lobbying, but sadly as we see in our history, and it is this part of history that indeed changed for the way we see it now Wilson won not only leading towards today's corruption, but this Imperial Intervention. Also remember the Gilded Age, the time of Free Market.

  • @nunomartins1143
    @nunomartins1143 5 лет назад +56

    Why is there no mention to tesla when talking about autonomous vehicles??

    • @larryspiller15
      @larryspiller15 5 лет назад +4

      Just wait until april 22nd. Tesla has an announcement regarding autonomy scheduled for then i believe.

    • @nicholi8208
      @nicholi8208 5 лет назад

      Or mention Andrew Yang

    • @radiantsquare007jrdeluxe9
      @radiantsquare007jrdeluxe9 5 лет назад +2

      because Tesla doesn't deserve mentioning. Lets not inflate Musk's already unjustifiably massive ego any further.

    • @briandiehl9257
      @briandiehl9257 5 лет назад

      @@nicholi8208 Andrew yang doesn't need mentioned in these discussions, but Tesla definitely does

    • @illlDCllli
      @illlDCllli 5 лет назад

      Renegade Fox lol you don’t have a clue. Ego has nothing to do with any of this.

  • @argishtib
    @argishtib 5 лет назад +65

    Hotz & Musk would disagree with video quite strongly.

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад

      The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities! Anywhere where there is too much spending, thats where the disruption will happen.

  • @sicpythonic
    @sicpythonic 5 лет назад +7

    If Waymo is such a leader in automation why can't I use it in more than one city? Tesla already has level 3 available to anyone that can afford a normal luxury sedan. It's not even close how far away Tesla is from it's competitors. It's really unfortunate Seeker chose to omit the massive software/hardware contributions made by the Tesla team.

    • @tanyo95
      @tanyo95 5 лет назад

      Yeah wonder why this video talked o little about the leader in the field Tesla

  • @ryansteffer
    @ryansteffer 5 лет назад +34

    3:25 This guy lists companies who are billions of miles behind (literally) Tesla, and calls them "leaders" in the emerging tech but doesn't list Tesla.
    Either he forgot somehow, or he has no clue what he's on about.

    • @sickbailey21
      @sickbailey21 5 лет назад +6

      theres a bit of bias behind the research team on this one in my opinion

    • @Spark_Plug17
      @Spark_Plug17 5 лет назад +1

      This video is lame. It's not objective

    • @singletracksender9021
      @singletracksender9021 5 лет назад

      Tesla already has the market, that’s indisputable. They already have an army of clean electric autonomous cars, millions of miles of data and a massive charging network while these startups are literally using old tech affixed to clunky gas cars using a dataset they don’t even have yet. It’s so bizarre to watch this, these companies are gonna get crushed lol.

  • @VuizTV
    @VuizTV 5 лет назад +40

    doesn't mention the fact that tesla has less deaths per mile with autopilot engaged than disengaged 🤔

    • @Dragonblood94
      @Dragonblood94 5 лет назад +3

      Do not trust any statistics you did not fake yourself.

    • @antoine444
      @antoine444 5 лет назад +1

      Autopilot is mainly used in highways so this is not representative of reality.

    • @larryspiller15
      @larryspiller15 5 лет назад +4

      Also says only camera's conveniently leaving out the radar that is also part of there hardware, and ignoring the fact that humans only use 2 camera's that are forward facing while the tesla has 8.

  • @kriss2005
    @kriss2005 5 лет назад +12

    You should have waited for Tesla's autonomy day. Game, set, match.

  • @meows_and_woof
    @meows_and_woof 5 лет назад +2

    Anyone who is into engineering and especially sensors will tell you- you can never rely on any technology alone! There are too many things to account for on the road! Unfortunately general public doesn’t know.
    Sensors work on feedback principle and even with the best control systems there are unpredictable errors occur.
    Cities have too many things to account for, it’s not just simple navigation and start-stop in time. On top of everything your sensors can be blocked by dirt, not receive signal due to bad weather conditions ( like heavy rain or snow/fog), not recognise or mistaken danger. Control response can get delayed or overshoot and overall driving will be very unstable.
    In UK we have very narrow road, give ways, roundabouts- no Tesla car can selfdrive on such roads. It will keep on stopping and holding the traffic.
    It’s good to have all those sensors just as a safety feature but drivers presence and attention will always be required

    • @guildrich
      @guildrich 5 лет назад +1

      @Touch Boinics Try telling that to the rest of the sheep who worship tech corporations like gods.

  • @dwnkaomwn3953
    @dwnkaomwn3953 5 лет назад +20

    Well, for folks who can't drive, it would greatly help them out.

    • @asdfag557
      @asdfag557 5 лет назад +1

      WE HAVE TAXIS TOO IN THIS WORLD U KNOW
      JUST KIDDING

    • @IkeReviews
      @IkeReviews 3 года назад +1

      Not everywhere has taxis and buses

  • @Drzika8000
    @Drzika8000 5 лет назад +6

    shoud have mentioned Tesla
    They are the leading company on autonomous driving tecnology
    One thing is a autonomous car that drive itself just on some especific maped neighborhood. Another thing is a car that can drive itself on almost every highway on level 2-3 autonomy in 80%-90% of the time and be realy safe doing it
    I'm not ignoring the importance of companies like waymo, of course they are extremely important to the development of this tecnology, the more people working on this is better
    The thing is that tesla autopilot is better, safer and more usable in various conditions( such as bad weather) and is constantly improving itself via software updates
    (English is not my first language, so I probably made some gramatical mistake writing this)

  • @rolandnemeth3982
    @rolandnemeth3982 5 лет назад +3

    I do not want to live in that world! - Do not assume everyone wants something.
    Driving is fun.

  • @Rowananimations
    @Rowananimations 4 года назад +2

    Here is a essay about self driving cars I made for school:
    I think robot cars will affect me poorly, for they could be dangerous. For example, they could drive you into a lake and you could drown.
    First of all, hacking is possible within robots, for phones are hacked, your accounts can be hacked, many stuff can be hacked. Now just imagine, if you were inside the object that was being hacked. Someone could hack your car to drive into a lake, or lock its doors. And you can’t do anything. With a phone, data can be deleted. If a car is hacked, you're inside the car, you like information inside, stored inside the car. Second of all, you have no control. I mean, you may tell your car to do something, but what if it picks it up wrong, or just ignores you?
    So, what I mean is, if you get in a No Drive Car, you're not the one driving. It’s a robot, programmed by a stranger you don’t even know, and it somehow follows through your orders, knows your voice, your looks, everything. Who knows, what if some hacker hacked into your car, and got all your information, just because it was…stored there. Once it’s hacked in, rumors and personal information could be spread around about you, and you can’t take it back. Once the words are out, they are out.
    So, I think robot cars will affect my life poorly. I could be hacked, I could give away my personal information.
    Should I really be putting myself in danger, just to sit back and relax?

  • @MrOMarr
    @MrOMarr 5 лет назад +3

    What’s the point of a car if you’re not driving it ?
    You might as well just call an Uber if you don’t wanna drive.. pretend like the driver isn’t there and sit there do whatever you would do in a “ driverless vehicle “ 🙄
    The whole point is to Enjoy the features that come with the vehicle you paid so much for.

  • @ahmadlamien4490
    @ahmadlamien4490 5 лет назад +23

    Tesla has the most advanced autopilot with 1 billion miles driven & you just took a dump on their achievement.

    • @Triality
      @Triality 5 лет назад +5

      Agreed, Seeker messed up bad on this one.

    • @tanyo95
      @tanyo95 5 лет назад +1

      ahmed ali So sick of the media hating on Tesla, happens all the time dammit!

  • @pauldannelachica3742
    @pauldannelachica3742 5 лет назад +20

    these video is misleading. tesla don't use camera only. tesla car have sensor

  • @abrahamgalvez7091
    @abrahamgalvez7091 5 лет назад +2

    Checked the date hoping this video came out 2 years ago or something. But nope it’s published 2019 and they don’t know the leaps and bound Tesla is making. Really shows how little people know about Tesla while “knowing all about their short comings”

  • @normberg1347
    @normberg1347 5 лет назад +9

    This video is completely clueless about the tech that Tesla is deploying now. How close are we... 12 months. Game, Set and Match. It's already over, it's just non-Tesla owners don't know it.

    • @singletracksender9021
      @singletracksender9021 5 лет назад

      Norm Berg Dude no kidding, it’s so weird watching this. I almost thought this video was 10 years old. Tesla already owns the market, these startups are gonna get crushed lol.

  • @FightCollective
    @FightCollective 5 лет назад +2

    Let me just stop you there... "This is a world we ALL want to live in"?!? Since when? I personally love driving and being behind the wheel.

  • @jonathanbell9349
    @jonathanbell9349 5 лет назад +23

    Self driving cars will eliminate traffic once all cars are self driven and commutes should take the exact amount of time every day.

    • @richardwaldron222
      @richardwaldron222 5 лет назад

      Lol because plains and trains are always on time.

    • @richardwaldron222
      @richardwaldron222 5 лет назад +4

      @Keith Christensen oh my goodness! Did those trains and planes crash because of traffic? Who put that car in the sky? No they do not crash because of traffic. Well if you get hit by a train you pretty much deserve it. You know because there not just gonna turn out of no where and getcha. You better watch out, those crazy train are well known for cutting left right off the tracks. Lol you're the reason we need self driving cars. Literally.

    • @NekoWinters
      @NekoWinters 5 лет назад +1

      I don't see it happening because they can't code for everything people are stupid and will screwed up somehow plus what if wild animals get on a highway the cars aren't going to know to go off road to get around a pile up

    • @christaylor9095
      @christaylor9095 5 лет назад

      @Keith Christensen the only way it will never happen is if we come up with and entirely new type of transportation or we destroy ourselves first. Otherwise, it's inevitable. Autonomous vehicles will virtually eliminate traffic, crashes, and vehicular fatalities.

    • @christaylor9095
      @christaylor9095 5 лет назад

      @Keith Christensen, yeah, except that it will.

  • @jamesharold5419
    @jamesharold5419 5 лет назад +5

    I’d rather drive than have a autonomous car.

  • @wilsonsamiano
    @wilsonsamiano 5 лет назад +24

    I don't understand why Tesla is always put down when it comes to self driving and everything else they do. In my opinion, Tesla is the only campany closer to self driving than any other ones.

    • @larryspiller15
      @larryspiller15 5 лет назад +3

      It's got to be financially motivated. Tesla has explained their approach to fsd for 3 years now and their method does make sense. They don't even acknowledge how their approach works which shows a strong bias.

    • @actualfactual8737
      @actualfactual8737 5 лет назад

      @@larryspiller15 The faster we can implement this the faster our engineers can get behind other important issues like robotics and dental replacements and other surgerys. It costs 4k to 5k each tooth to replace!! Imagine replacing a whole set!!!. Now the government wants to give free everything healthcare and thats going backwards. Time to take the free market back and make other things much safer and cheaper with robotics, 5G , ultrasonic sensors and AI if not at least algorythms. Now thats a few industries technology can disrupt, imagine the real posibilities! Anywhere where there is too much spending, thats where the disruption will happen.

  • @hunterxcraft8328
    @hunterxcraft8328 5 лет назад +4

    Why do people think cameras wont be enough for self driving cars? I only drive with my eyes I'm gonna assume a computer can do the same.

    • @caddyguy5369
      @caddyguy5369 5 лет назад +1

      Hunter x craft If you only drive with your eyes, your doing it wrong... :-)

    • @hunterxcraft8328
      @hunterxcraft8328 5 лет назад

      @@caddyguy5369 lol I only need my eyes to see allowing me to drive. I dont need radar. Logically neither would a car that drives itself

    • @caddyguy5369
      @caddyguy5369 5 лет назад +1

      Hunter x craft Well considering I was talking about hearing and feeling the subtle movements of weight shifting and the feeling of the road, I'm just going to file this one under r/woosh.
      Sure a person can drive with only their eyes. That doesn't mean one is good at it. I'm talking about hitting efficient driving lines, which most people have no clue about and I highly doubt self driving cars available to the public anytime in my lifetime will be any good at.

    • @TheSoundOfTwang
      @TheSoundOfTwang 5 лет назад +1

      @@caddyguy5369.. Not to mention, braking isn't always the best option, if ever, to avoid running into stuff. Which is the only option self driving vehicles are capable of

  • @scikick
    @scikick 5 лет назад +31

    12:55 **Buying** a car? Nope!!
    We millennials will just pay a monthly subscription instead.

    • @caddyguy5369
      @caddyguy5369 5 лет назад +1

      scikick Speak for yourself. I'd rather buy.

    • @zombieshoot4318
      @zombieshoot4318 5 лет назад +1

      scikick agreed. I’m not a millennial but if the price of a subscription is lower than the costs of owning one I’m going with subscription. The good thing about subscribing is that I can change the car as needed. Going to work I use just a regular but maybe on the weekend I need a truck or SUV size. Can’t do that if I own the car.

    • @doublew030
      @doublew030 5 лет назад

      Just please stop voting! Lol

    • @guildrich
      @guildrich 5 лет назад

      ​@1000 Subscribers With No Videos *_"Millennials love putting their self In debt."_*
      Amen to that! And this is coming _from_ a "millennial".

  • @wdyahnke
    @wdyahnke 5 лет назад

    I like your long form in depth videos better than your short ones. Keep up the good work!

  • @Frobard
    @Frobard 5 лет назад +5

    Is anyone thinking about what the bad guys will do? Trying to disturb the radars, gps and cameras of the cars using micro wave transmitters and green lasers and whatnot. Quite scary I think.

    • @Seeker
      @Seeker  5 лет назад

      Scary indeed! There's a cool article here that sums up a talk by car hacker duo Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek, explaining how they work to simplify and secure self-driving car designs to make them impervious to attacks: www.theregister.co.uk/2018/08/10/autonomous_car_hacking/. You can also read their full report here: illmatics.com/securing_self_driving_cars.pdf
      You know what we say... MORE RESEARCH IS NEEDED! 🕵️

    • @caddyguy5369
      @caddyguy5369 5 лет назад +1

      Frobard Can't lie. I'm not a fan of autonomous vehicles, but I have thought about how fun it will be to mess with them while they have no control over what the car does because they are too lazy to pay attention and learn how to drive.

  • @ICONICMUSIC
    @ICONICMUSIC 5 лет назад +4

    Love this idea of our city planner overlords structuring the whole thing, because government and central planning generally works (it doesn't).

  • @ryansteffer
    @ryansteffer 5 лет назад +34

    4:44 There is so much misinformation in this video. Please guys, do your research before you publish this kind of stuff.
    "Elon thinks we can do this with cameras alone." *Wrong.* Teslas have a multitude of sonar sensors to augment the camera vision.
    "[Cameras] still struggle with darkness, depth, and reflections." Humans drive with cameras alone. We don't have range sensors or anything else, yet we manage. So yeah, it's likely very possible cameras will absolutely "cut it", as you put it.
    "Lidar is probably the most common and most impressive technology being used." Holy shit, seriously? Most common? Absolutely not even close! Tesla has WAY more miles than anyone else, and they're not using 360-degree Lidar. Most impressive? I guess it's a matter of opinion, but you don't think artificial intelligence and machines learning to interpret the world around them is more impressive than laser range detectors?
    On a whole, this video feels extremely poorly researched. Which is sad, because this "future" technology is something that's extremely close, and almost everyone watching this will experience in their lifetime. Seeker really dropped the ball on this one, and lost at least one subscriber as a result.

    • @pw7225
      @pw7225 5 лет назад +1

      Ryan Steffer Teslas don’t have lasers afaik. Please provide source.

  • @uprightape100
    @uprightape100 5 лет назад +5

    The "level 5" icon should be slammin Tequila and doin bong hits. For accuracy.

    • @adolfodef
      @adolfodef 5 лет назад +1

      Actually it contains a HUGE error -> LVL 5 should NOT have a driver wheel a human could use to "interfere" with the car´s A.I. normal (superior) workings.

  • @joshjenks3715
    @joshjenks3715 5 лет назад +9

    Ummm... i dont want to live in a world where i have to get a physical in a car

  • @tapuout101
    @tapuout101 5 лет назад +1

    We could of been at level 5 10yrs ago if they asked me. :) I felt it would be a lot easier to change the roads to magnetic tracks. The cars to shuttles wouldnt need an engine because it would be powered by the tracks which would make cars(shuttle) cheaper, lighter and need Zero Gas. You/City/States would use a program/computer/AI to run the whole transportation system. The system would go faster and faster as the bugs got worked out. You would no longer have accidents, drunk drivers, missing people, and crimes ect. The shuttle would be able to tell you instantly how long it will take to get where you are going. You would no longer need seats in front they all could be around a table like in a van. :) If this was in place it would eliminate the need for gas and oil. :)

  • @Mr0BC
    @Mr0BC 5 лет назад +10

    I hope these are never finished tbh

    • @Rubysh88
      @Rubysh88 5 лет назад +1

      why not, are you another "good ol'days motorhead" purist?

    • @Mr0BC
      @Mr0BC 5 лет назад +4

      @@Rubysh88 No I am not. I am just a guy who's ascared about the concept of Strong AI. I am reading a book by Roger Penrose, The Emporor's New Mind, where he writes in length about shortcomings of artificial intelligence. I feel machines should be used as tools, not totally act on our behalf... Eh but what do I know.

    • @TheSoundOfTwang
      @TheSoundOfTwang 5 лет назад +6

      @@Rubysh88 What's so awfull about driving a car yourself? If driverless cars become a real thing, at some point you won't be alowed to drive a car

    • @hamsammich8781
      @hamsammich8781 5 лет назад +2

      @@Rubysh88 And your just happy to trade over another freedom in the name of what? laziness?

    • @guildrich
      @guildrich 5 лет назад +1

      @@Mr0BC *_"I am just a guy who's ascared about the concept of Strong AI...I feel machines should be used as tools, not totally act on our behalf..."_*
      👏👏👏 YOU sir, hit the nail right on the head with that one! The rest of the "flock", however, will continue to worship Silicon Valley and the A.I. that it creates as their "gods" until "they" deem us humans as unnecessary. And this is coming from a PC gaming enthusiast, mind you.

  • @xagi123
    @xagi123 5 лет назад +22

    Either poorly done research or completely biased disregarding major players and spreading false information's also.

  • @PedramNG
    @PedramNG 5 лет назад +1

    Amazing, I'm so impatient to be a part of this revolution.😀

  • @2BitGamers
    @2BitGamers 5 лет назад +5

    Shouldn't we record the brains of some Tokyo drifters so all our car's can Fast and the Furious everywhere flawlessly?

  • @christianlibertarian5488
    @christianlibertarian5488 5 лет назад +2

    Just got a new car, which has some of these "level 2" functions. I HATE IT. I have turned most of them off. It was constantly telling me I was out of my lane when I wasn't, that I was closer to the objects ahead of me than I was, and trying to brake for me when I didn't want to.

  • @Scribe13013
    @Scribe13013 5 лет назад +5

    I'd hate that actually...I don't even like it when friends drive

    • @TheSoundOfTwang
      @TheSoundOfTwang 5 лет назад +1

      @@sarahy.2442 Sometimes you're the passenger in the friends car

  • @Platyfurmany
    @Platyfurmany 5 лет назад

    Wow! Excellent look at a developing technology that will impact all of us in the near future! Well done, Seeker! Great presentation, Maren!!!

  • @dreiak
    @dreiak 5 лет назад +17

    Too much about sensors and not enough about machine learning and neural nets. Tesla is easilly lightyears ahead of waymo. Tesla is building a fully dynamic self sufficent system, waymo relies on geo fenced locations where all the challenges have to be pre determined how the system reacts to unique features, or edge cases in the area they cover. Tesla is building more than autopilot, but a self driving neural net that exists today, amd collects two to three orders of magnitude more data than anyone else.
    Sorry its no contest. I do believe Tesla will have Full Self Driving by the end of this year. Their approach is much harder to get to work, but when it does, it is easily the most logical approach for how to get it done. Humans will train the machine without even realizing it, just like the google search algorhythm.

    • @theoeguia3302
      @theoeguia3302 3 года назад +1

      Its been two years. You are wrong. Telsa cars still need humans.
      The cars are not fully automated by AI.
      You are so wrong!

    • @dreiak
      @dreiak 3 года назад

      @@theoeguia3302 lol. Let's place a bet. I am $200k deep in Tesla, you can short the stock or buy waymo, and we will see who wins.

    • @ramseybland4192
      @ramseybland4192 3 года назад

      @@dreiak So stock price == self driving?

  • @user-vn7ce5ig1z
    @user-vn7ce5ig1z 5 лет назад +2

    Long-haul freight-shipping truck fleets will be automated long before passenger vehicles will become self-driving. It is much easier for a truck to drive itself on a long, straight stretch of highway than for a vehicle to navigate a busy urban environment with a million variables. Long-distance transportation might become automated, but regular around-the-city travel won't in the foreseeable future.

    • @philterry3293
      @philterry3293 5 лет назад

      You have no idea how close Tesla are to full autonomy. the biggest obstacle will be government legislation.

  • @beastie_387
    @beastie_387 5 лет назад +5

    You should have made the video after Tesla's autonomous driving convention on the 22nd they're probably going to talk about level four and such

  • @rayedminhaz1212
    @rayedminhaz1212 5 лет назад +3

    Level 10: birth of lightning mcqueen.

  • @ShibuyaIncident8173
    @ShibuyaIncident8173 5 лет назад +3

    Tesla now has full self driving

  • @sickbailey21
    @sickbailey21 5 лет назад

    I love it when you guys make longer videos. However not keen on the research team for this one.

  • @MarkLLawrence
    @MarkLLawrence 5 лет назад +3

    Hopefully they are ready to update this video after the Tesla announcement later this month. 10 years away from being able to buy a car with thise capabilities? My Model 3 already has the hardware necessary, it's just a matter of software now.

  • @tommyking7340
    @tommyking7340 5 лет назад

    I’m a professional drone pilot, I’ve helped in the surveying of land, plots, bridges, lakes and canals. Drafting square footage/kilometers for commercial business and the private sector. Just with the equipment I own and operate with, The autonomous factor level and firmware used just in my DJI brand drones alone are unmatched. My latest drone has multiple 360 real-sense 4K cameras
    x10 each all the way around it with 6 sensor points of obstacles avoidance that can virtually see through and around blind curves and buildings. Not to mention dual sensing GPS (Russ/USA) barometric pressure assist in altitude hold/climb rate, and separate Optical flow sensors. You really would have a hard time trying to wreck, bump, or crash it purposely. Now imagine all this on a larger scale the size of an SUV.

  • @username90491
    @username90491 5 лет назад +14

    Video was super well made too bad you didnt make it yesterday when i had an exam on autonomous driving ;-;

  • @nona2909
    @nona2909 5 лет назад +1

    Ever since I subscribed to Seeker, my brain has grown over 200 times larger with all the knowledge. True story!

    • @guildrich
      @guildrich 5 лет назад +1

      @Nona I doubt you'll be able to fit into one of those "autonomous" cars, then. 😂

  • @TheDarkserpent
    @TheDarkserpent 5 лет назад +10

    At least we have motorcycles, never saw an autonomous motorcycle 🏍 😉

    • @frankhanna6745
      @frankhanna6745 5 лет назад +3

      BMW built one. Just look for it on RUclips.

    • @sickbailey21
      @sickbailey21 5 лет назад

      @Keith Christensen as the software matures for cars, it wont be hard to achieve that on bikes.

    • @qncsc
      @qncsc 5 лет назад

      then you know its over
      "Terminator Salvation"

    • @johnwang9914
      @johnwang9914 5 лет назад

      One of the competitors in the DARPA challenge that the Stanford team won was an autonomous motorcycle. It did not do very well on the slow speed obstacle navigation test as it wasn't able to keep it's balance. Presumably had it employed a gyroscopic balance mechanism, it may have been able to handle the low speed tasks.

    • @lajya01
      @lajya01 5 лет назад +2

      It would be totally pointless. Motorcycles are mostly used by enthusiasts not by Mr/Mrs everybody who just needs basic transportation.

  • @Roboboy
    @Roboboy 5 лет назад

    This was a refreshingly balanced perspective on AVs! 🙏 Usually AV coverage only includes the tech bros and the people who financially benefit from automation. I sincerely appreciate you including Corinne from NACTO. The policy perspective of things above and around the AVs themselves is often absent.

  • @StonedSpagooter
    @StonedSpagooter 5 лет назад +3

    Im 22 and And I wont be buying one in my life time unless it is handed to me for free.
    I love driving, not sitting behind a wheel. There is a difference.

    • @jacobriddle9241
      @jacobriddle9241 5 лет назад

      I agree

    • @mystickyipod
      @mystickyipod 5 лет назад

      Kole Tokar You obviously don’t sit in bumper to bumper for 2 hours a day then.

    • @Thelango99
      @Thelango99 5 лет назад

      Who said anything about sitting behind a wheel, as cars in the future might not even require that.

    • @lajya01
      @lajya01 5 лет назад

      I don't see the point of owning those cars anyway. It will probably be offered as "car as a service" since they can pick you up by themselves.

    • @caddyguy5369
      @caddyguy5369 5 лет назад

      Leader Locksmith That seems like a dumb place to live.

  • @dinraal-mtg
    @dinraal-mtg 5 лет назад +2

    thx for the episode. This was a really fun watch. So much quality in the production.

  • @David-qm7du
    @David-qm7du 5 лет назад +5

    Don't take away my freedom to advertise how my driving skills excel over the populous.

    • @ravirajyaguru5905
      @ravirajyaguru5905 5 лет назад +3

      David Czolij exactly! What about people like us who love, and are great at driving!

    • @epic0wnag
      @epic0wnag 5 лет назад

      Ravi Rajyaguru Don’t worry you will be fine for a long time before it is illegal to drive on your own. Eventually driving will become a hobby like horse riding. Where people go to a certain area to drive and have fun.

  • @Dirtfire
    @Dirtfire 5 лет назад +1

    These driverless cars will explode in popularity almost overnight.

  • @samurai8223
    @samurai8223 5 лет назад +3

    I want to ask one thing "Who will be responsible if a self-driving car hits or kill someone?".

    • @Belle_Marielle
      @Belle_Marielle 5 лет назад

      the human driver of course

    • @poker4400
      @poker4400 5 лет назад

      True it is inevitable that will happen, but on a positive note. With self driving cars the number of accidents will be reduced dramatically.

    • @powertomato
      @powertomato 5 лет назад

      I think we can use auto-pilots for planes as an analogy. In the early stages the pilots were blamed, this is the stage where society and our laws are today and will likely stay there for an other decade or two. In the case of planes that slowly transisions to manufacturers as automatisation is growing more mature. We can see this with the recent groundings of boeing planes: Faulty automatisation is now seen as part of the plane rather than a pilot responsibility to correct/account for. Also as technology progresses there is less and less a pilot can actually do to prevent accidents in a case of failure.
      One interessting realisation we had along the way (that might have played a role in this change of mind): The more reliable the technology becomes, the less likely it becomes for a pilot to intervene, as they learn to trust the automation. Imagine this: there is a red button that you need to press as fast as possible as soon as a red light lights up in order to prevent a catastrophe. If that happens often, you will expect it and react fast, but if that happens extremly rarely you will react much slower as your mind will drift away to that point that you might miss it completly.
      So my bet would be the drivers will have full responsibility until the manufacturers start removing the possiblity to intervene. At that point it's the manufacturers who will take the civil responsibility, but most of the financial responsibility will remain at the owner. Meaning that if people get killed, the owner will take no blame, but will still have to pay damages that his car causes. As its often the case with stuff that happens rarely and (seemingly) randomly insurances will cushion those responsibilities, and will switch their risk model to something based more on accident density (i.e. you will have to pay more, if your car drives on streets where accidents happen more often or the car make you own is involved in more accidents).

  • @sjvche7675
    @sjvche7675 5 лет назад +1

    AI cars remind me about the paperless office saying " there will be a paperless office when there is a paperless BATHROOM". In a DECADE or two maybe;
    sensors, algorithms, and data bases have a long way to go, the real world is random, not limited and controlled space like a video game or simulator.

    • @guildrich
      @guildrich 5 лет назад

      *_"...not limited and controlled space like a video game or simulator."_*
      But that is the ultimate goal; to sterilize society.

  • @NekoNinja13
    @NekoNinja13 5 лет назад +12

    I really dont want a car, so I really hope autonomous driving becomes a normal thing

    • @caddyguy5369
      @caddyguy5369 5 лет назад

      Chad Connelly Why would it matter to you either way if you aren't going to get either?

    • @EbilEnemyofBurgerTown
      @EbilEnemyofBurgerTown 4 года назад

      Chad Connelly
      Your RUclips name matches you perfectly: A lazy millennial chad boy.

  • @calum6282
    @calum6282 5 лет назад +1

    Great video, with one glaring problem. It is said that crashes with autonomous vehicles suggest that we should be hesitant to allow widespread use of level 2-3 autonomy, however this is misleading. The number of crashes per mile driven with existing autonomous platforms (namely Tesla, for their vast dataset proven time and time again), is significantly lower than the number of crashes per mile driven by human drivers. The technology is already safer, yet the few crashes highlighted in the video suggest otherwise.

  • @alvinrodrigues5943
    @alvinrodrigues5943 5 лет назад +3

    Tesla is simply better then the competition

  • @chublez
    @chublez 5 лет назад +1

    I love how this city folk think they're ever going to have empty pleasant uncrowded streets. Making cars drive themselves isn't going to change your population density. Best case it relieves some traffic cause by human errors when the machines make less errors. Still not going to get people walking cross town to work in the rain and even if you did somehow manage this completely unrelated daydream there would then be lots of people walking around. The animation with like 4 cars a bus and a few pedestrians....not downtown.

  • @CuriosityCulture
    @CuriosityCulture 5 лет назад +19

    I'm making the popcorn to watch the political fights on this topic

  • @lecisko
    @lecisko 5 лет назад

    Maren is a great host. I really like the enthusiasm for each topic!

  • @billfarrell6638
    @billfarrell6638 5 лет назад +7

    Suspicious avoidance of talking about Tesla here. They're the biggest contender in this space and never talked about in this video.

  • @Duricas
    @Duricas 5 лет назад +1

    First rule of driving I learned is that I could not trust the other driver. Since I don't know what their thinking, I therefore do not know what they are doing. If I can't trust a primitive sapien to drive (safely), how am I going to trust a machine to drive (safely)? Just because we can do a thing, doesn't mean we should do a thing.

  • @daxxonjabiru428
    @daxxonjabiru428 5 лет назад +8

    I have a self driving car. I drive it my-self.

  • @miguelmiquel5497
    @miguelmiquel5497 5 лет назад +1

    no this is not a world we all want to live in . driving is freedom.

  • @mrbalz5404
    @mrbalz5404 5 лет назад +6

    I watched your "how close are we to getting picture of black hole video" day before they published it, lol.

  • @doomdani
    @doomdani 5 лет назад

    This was an incredibly informative and well put,easy to comprehend journey of autonomous vehicles ! Great job seeker!

  • @Max_Flashheart
    @Max_Flashheart 5 лет назад +4

    Our Grandchildren will not believe we actually drove cars manually without an AI system and certainly won't believe we used refined oil products as the preferred fuel source.

  • @marianoalippi5226
    @marianoalippi5226 5 лет назад

    When I was very young it was with a Swiss casarodante with my Uncle who created it, and we had to stop in the middle of the road and witness a fatal car accident, I was really shocked by that episode, if technology could avoid especially in the routes the end of accidents, would be a great progress for humanity.

  • @anshulsharma9424
    @anshulsharma9424 5 лет назад +7

    A daily dose of current science and technology

  • @jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104
    @jeremywvarietyofviewpoints3104 5 лет назад

    Seeker is a fantastic science channel. The videos are well illustrated with relevant footage

  • @tilak231
    @tilak231 5 лет назад +4

    This technology is the best ever because that’s the only invention that will give me two extra more hours to SLEEP!!!)))

    • @holleey
      @holleey 5 лет назад +1

      or just one because traffic will be much more efficient once the majority of cars is self driving. :P

    • @briandiehl9257
      @briandiehl9257 5 лет назад +1

      @@holleey Then he would have to leave later, still giving him extra time to sleep

    • @holleey
      @holleey 5 лет назад

      @@briandiehl9257 daminit.. I failed at logic ^^

    • @briandiehl9257
      @briandiehl9257 5 лет назад

      @@holleey Maybe you just need more sleep...

  • @PockASqueeno
    @PockASqueeno 4 года назад +2

    “Road block.” I see what you did there. 😏

  • @benistingray6097
    @benistingray6097 5 лет назад +7

    "This is a world we all want to live in" Meh, speak for yourself, i much rather drive cars on my own!

  • @mikehattias5837
    @mikehattias5837 5 лет назад

    great video production folks

  • @bebomac5
    @bebomac5 5 лет назад +3

    It’s very interesting that the only mentions of Tesla/Musk are negative, inaccurate put downs and backhanded slights. I’m certain the answer to this bizarre tone lies in who’s funding the video. To be clear Tesla is the trail blazing (real world) leader in autonomous driving, and no one else comes close. Btw, more than half a million Teslas are on the road, with billions upon billions of miles driven. Yes there have been less than a handful of Autopilot involved accidents, all caused by driver misuse. THUMBS DOWN for dishonesty and misinformation.

  • @funny-video-YouTube-channel
    @funny-video-YouTube-channel 5 лет назад +1

    *Tesla said 2 years.* Around 2021 to 2025.
    They are upgrading their software all the time.

  • @BeachJedi101
    @BeachJedi101 5 лет назад +3

    From SF to San Jose, there are so many of these cars being tested.

  • @CRASS2047
    @CRASS2047 5 лет назад

    The future is crazy! I can see the front seat slowly being removed from AVs as we get to levels 4-5. It will be amazing once it’s basically a living room on wheels. Full size customized vans for large parties and just imagine the luxury cars like RR and Bentley! So exciting to be alive during this era. Although I wish I was born 200 years in the future.

  • @nitrousoxide2265
    @nitrousoxide2265 5 лет назад +3

    Next robot police having the ability to kill humans

  • @koningsbruggen
    @koningsbruggen 5 лет назад +1

    It is weird to suggest it cannot be done with camera's alone. The road is literally designed to be able to be used by people using there eye sight. Camera's are better at seeing in the dark and you can have camera's on all sides.