Equality, which is in article 14 and article 15, it should be in civil laws, therefore the Constitution Assembly keep provision of the Uniform Civil Code in article 44. According the concurrent list in the schedule vii, the central government and the state government, both governments have power to make laws in respect to marriage, divorce, maintenance, succession, adoption. The provision of the Uniform Civil Code was not, is not, shall not be against freedom of religion in article 25. It freedom of religion is not unlimited. Public orders, health, morality and another fundamental rights in part iii of the constitution are limitations of freedom of religion. Like the Manusmruti can not be a part of freedom of religion, likewise the shariya can not be a part of it. If anyone claims, the Uniform Civil Code is anti - Moslem or anti - constitution or anti - secularism, the he/she misleads and he/she is a liar.
Ex Muslim movement ZINDABAD
Thank you so much for full explain
Glad it was helpful!
@@shafique17 yes
informative vedio ❤❤
Ex Muslim sahil 🔥🔥
Joing.ka.video.banaiye.sahayak.Urdu.
Equality, which is in article 14 and article 15, it should be in civil laws, therefore the Constitution Assembly keep provision of the Uniform Civil Code in article 44. According the concurrent list in the schedule vii, the central government and the state government, both governments have power to make laws in respect to marriage, divorce, maintenance, succession, adoption. The provision of the Uniform Civil Code was not, is not, shall not be against freedom of religion in article 25. It freedom of religion is not unlimited. Public orders, health, morality and another fundamental rights in part iii of the constitution are limitations of freedom of religion. Like the Manusmruti can not be a part of freedom of religion, likewise the shariya can not be a part of it. If anyone claims, the Uniform Civil Code is anti - Moslem or anti - constitution or anti - secularism, the he/she misleads and he/she is a liar.