This is a great explanation. However, one quick question, please. At 18.31 elapsed time, on the bottom line, should the third term on the RHS be (omega x v') rather than (omega x v) as shown??
Because it arises from your choice of reference frame. This means it's not a proper Newtonian Force. There is no "equal-and-opposite" for the Coriolis acceleration.
1:43 Wait but I thought nothing in the universe is ever at rest? You mention matter or mass will either stay at rest or move in a straight line if nothing acts upon it. But isn’t there law or rule stating nothing in the universe is actually at rest? That is very interesting if true to think that nothing is ever fully at rest, everything is moving. Or am I wrong here?
Good to see you Dr. Kendall.
I would like to mention that gemini (google's ai) recommended me ur video while i was asking my doubts abt this very topic
keep going that's beautiful
This is a great explanation. However, one quick question, please. At 18.31 elapsed time, on the bottom line, should the third term on the RHS be (omega x v') rather than
(omega x v) as shown??
Thanks for the correction!
Great video! One question: if the force of gravity cancels out with the reaction by the table, why does the ball presses against the table?
Thank you, this is really helpful!
Can't wait!!🙌
This is a great explanation, thank you!
You're very welcome!
Sir, Can u share how did that differential operator work or why is it that we cannot differentiate directly?
It sure what you mean?
Great video
How is it that each time we study a rotating body, we only consider mv²/r and a', and we neglect coriolis acceleration
Because it arises from your choice of reference frame. This means it's not a proper Newtonian Force. There is no "equal-and-opposite" for the Coriolis acceleration.
Contained herein is information unavailable to Kings 100 years ago. And there's seven of us watching
Well, at least you’re here.
simple explination
Amazing
Thank you
You're welcome
1:43 Wait but I thought nothing in the universe is ever at rest? You mention matter or mass will either stay at rest or move in a straight line if nothing acts upon it. But isn’t there law or rule stating nothing in the universe is actually at rest? That is very interesting if true to think that nothing is ever fully at rest, everything is moving. Or am I wrong here?