Judo scoring needs to change. If you put them prone multiple times because they keep trying to put you supine and failing, that should count for something.
@@ericleigh9098 I agree entirely that the rules/scoring have changed the appearance of the combat, and have said that elsewhere I think in this comment section, but I guess I just don't understand your complaint then. The ideas that judo was ever truly a "gentle way" or that, once upon a time, strength didn't matter in it, are ridiculous. Yes, judo is gentler than, say, boxing, but it is and always has been centered around takedowns: using gravity and mechanics to throw your opponent to the ground. That makes it far more dangerous than sports like ju jitsu (any kind) or wrestling (any kind), because those only involve takedowns as one element rather than nearly the entire goal and purpose of sport. The #1 thing that causes severe injury in combat sports is gravity of falling bodies. As far as "brawl" goes, I don't understand that complaint at all, especially not from someone who claims to be a judoka. Every movement of these women is very clearly and obviously, to anyone who knows much at all, highly technical. It's easy to understand why they're doing what they do, even for someone not nearly as good as them ... and they're very good. They're going for ippons (takedown of the opponent to the back) while trying to avoid them themselves. My own complaint is that the focus solely on ippons while ignoring things like obtaining an overall dominant position turns the sport into this. Wrestling has some of this too, where you can completely dominate the fight yet not "score" because no 3 seconds of shoulders to the mat. But there it's not as bad because the 3 second rule makes the overall ground game more important.
It's not that they're both bad. It's that they're both very good and can avoid each others takedowns. The problem isn't combat judo nor their skill at it. The problem is the scoring system of competition judo, which basically doesn't reward anything at all except putting someone on their back. When you're rewarded only for that then, at the highest level, competition starts to look like this.
@@bublik_bl конечно, диванный. А для кого они борятся? Именно для меня, а я хочу видеть красивую борьбу, а ее эти дерганья на шидо. Гоните ее в шею, не позорьте красивый спорт.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Judo scoring needs to change. If you put them prone multiple times because they keep trying to put you supine and failing, that should count for something.
Daria, fantastic job. God bless you and your country. Stay safe and pure. God bless 🙏
Ha, ha, ha , , ,
🇧🇷 🇧🇷🇧🇷
💙💛✊🏻🤟
❤
go Daria
Where’s the “gentle way” in this? Looks more like a brawl and a strength contest to me.
That's because you don't understand the throws, scoring, or what they're actually doing with their feet and legs.
@@Apostate1970 wrong. I was a judoka. That is not the gentle way. The sport has degraded due to rule changes.
@@ericleigh9098 I agree entirely that the rules/scoring have changed the appearance of the combat, and have said that elsewhere I think in this comment section, but I guess I just don't understand your complaint then. The ideas that judo was ever truly a "gentle way" or that, once upon a time, strength didn't matter in it, are ridiculous. Yes, judo is gentler than, say, boxing, but it is and always has been centered around takedowns: using gravity and mechanics to throw your opponent to the ground. That makes it far more dangerous than sports like ju jitsu (any kind) or wrestling (any kind), because those only involve takedowns as one element rather than nearly the entire goal and purpose of sport. The #1 thing that causes severe injury in combat sports is gravity of falling bodies.
As far as "brawl" goes, I don't understand that complaint at all, especially not from someone who claims to be a judoka. Every movement of these women is very clearly and obviously, to anyone who knows much at all, highly technical. It's easy to understand why they're doing what they do, even for someone not nearly as good as them ... and they're very good. They're going for ippons (takedown of the opponent to the back) while trying to avoid them themselves.
My own complaint is that the focus solely on ippons while ignoring things like obtaining an overall dominant position turns the sport into this. Wrestling has some of this too, where you can completely dominate the fight yet not "score" because no 3 seconds of shoulders to the mat. But there it's not as bad because the 3 second rule makes the overall ground game more important.
Call that Judo! Ffs! It's more interesting watching grass grow. Both as bad as each other.
It's not that they're both bad. It's that they're both very good and can avoid each others takedowns. The problem isn't combat judo nor their skill at it. The problem is the scoring system of competition judo, which basically doesn't reward anything at all except putting someone on their back. When you're rewarded only for that then, at the highest level, competition starts to look like this.
Такие, как белодед, делают дзюдо скучным и неинтересным. Где броски?
диванный эксперт
@@bublik_bl конечно, диванный. А для кого они борятся? Именно для меня, а я хочу видеть красивую борьбу, а ее эти дерганья на шидо. Гоните ее в шею, не позорьте красивый спорт.
@@donkeyia4337 а зато она самая красивая!
@@Фердинант-х6ш так пусть сверкает в тик токе, а я уту абе посмотрю, а не эту лошадь.
❤
❤