Glad you found this helpful. You can find the video here where I showed how to setup an Excel sheet to solve an example problem: ruclips.net/video/l8bzAMgQhyM/видео.htmlsi=wcogxTBmBqUyouNo
Hi, the value of rho_w is always Greater than or equal to 0. It can't be negative. This is worthy to note. Furthermore it is unlikely that V_c1 is equal to V_c2. Because V_c2 is the shear buckling strength considering there is no post buckling shear strength. V_c1 considers tension field action or post buckling shear strength. That being said if you obtain a negative value for Rho_w just take it as zero. And the minimum required Moment of inertia is simply I_st2. A common practice to make life easy is to take I_st as I_st1. This assumes that rho_w is 1. But this is too conservative and can lead to an unnecessarily expensive design.
Comprehensive explanation, waiting for the example
Glad you found this helpful. You can find the example here: ruclips.net/video/l8bzAMgQhyM/видео.htmlsi=wcogxTBmBqUyouNo
Good Explaination, Thank you!
Excellent explanation as always 🔥🔥
Example problem video please
Glad you found this helpful. You can find the video here where I showed how to setup an Excel sheet to solve an example problem: ruclips.net/video/l8bzAMgQhyM/видео.htmlsi=wcogxTBmBqUyouNo
👍👍👍
When V_c1=V_c2 how to determine the value of
ho_w? Thanks
Hi, the value of rho_w is always Greater than or equal to 0. It can't be negative. This is worthy to note. Furthermore it is unlikely that V_c1 is equal to V_c2. Because V_c2 is the shear buckling strength considering there is no post buckling shear strength. V_c1 considers tension field action or post buckling shear strength. That being said if you obtain a negative value for Rho_w just take it as zero. And the minimum required Moment of inertia is simply I_st2. A common practice to make life easy is to take I_st as I_st1. This assumes that rho_w is 1. But this is too conservative and can lead to an unnecessarily expensive design.
Thank you@@FrameMindsEngineering