Cambridge KJV Concord Reference Edition - Bible Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 фев 2025

Комментарии • 55

  • @perseverethetradition4223
    @perseverethetradition4223 3 года назад +8

    Man you have no idea how long I have been trying to find MY Bible for the rest of my life I just got The Concord to your video thank you so much 🙏

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  3 года назад +1

      Wonderful! So glad to hear this!

    • @gleasonparker1684
      @gleasonparker1684 3 года назад

      It served me from about 1969 to NOW. Now a new one out of respect. If I had to pick one this might be IT.

  • @AFrischPerspective
    @AFrischPerspective 4 года назад +12

    Beautiful and classic. I just got a Concord in Marbled Mahogany Calfskin from EV Bible. Thanks for the review!

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  4 года назад +3

      Thanks, Tim! Those new full yapp editions look awesome!

  • @georgestobbart4894
    @georgestobbart4894 3 года назад +5

    Just ordered mine arrives tomorrow 🙏🏼

  • @faithtowalkministries132
    @faithtowalkministries132 2 года назад +1

    I enjoyed reviewing this Bible as well. It’s very nice and compact to take wherever! Thanks for doing a great review brother

  • @Rob-lu2ns
    @Rob-lu2ns 4 года назад +3

    You have great reviews, I'm glad you're reviewing some KJVs. I love the Concord, I recently purchased the marbled mahogany with full yapp edition from EVB.

  • @Me2Lancer
    @Me2Lancer 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for your excellent review of the Cambridge KJV Concord Reference Bible. It is quite similar to a Cambridge Pitt Minion KJV I purchased in June 1963. The cover on my Pitt Minion is described as Morocco hand grained leather. It remains in good condition, flexible with a good pebble texture on the exterior. My Pitt Minion was manufactured in London.

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 года назад +3

    I had a concord bible from about 1970 to 1987. It was great

  • @guymontag349
    @guymontag349 4 года назад +5

    Good review, Tim. The Concord, along with the Cambridge Cameo, is among my favorite KJV Bibles. I do think, however, that the Schuyler Canterbury has a better glossary of Elizabethan/Jacobean words no longer in the English lexicon, but the Cambridge offerings are still superior in my humble opinion. I just wish that Cambridge would publish the Concord in other versions. Oh, to have a Cambridge Concord In verse by verse format in the NKJV!

  • @RoastBeefSandwich
    @RoastBeefSandwich 4 года назад +3

    Hello friend. I love the Concord! I have all three editions - a personal sized (published by the Trinitarian Bible Society), a standard in Goatskin, and a wide margin in Goatskin. I love the way they did the references - you get all the references without any marks cluttering up the words.

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  4 года назад +2

      Such a great Bible. You’re fully loaded!

  • @johnenglish4652
    @johnenglish4652 Год назад +1

    Mine says the maps are from Moody Bible Institute. The Concord wide margin is very nice too.

  • @jayandrew87
    @jayandrew87 Год назад +1

    Great review. Wish they made this in a black FY!

  • @philr3381
    @philr3381 2 года назад +1

    Although I don't use the KJV as my primary translation, I love the concord reference. I found the reduced size in French Morocco leather at a local bible shop and couldn't pass it up. The study sections have helped tremendously in seminary

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  2 года назад

      Thanks for sharing, Phil! It's a GREAT Bible.

    • @philr3381
      @philr3381 2 года назад

      @@timwildsmith the concord reduced version is very cool. It's the size of a Pitt Minion just a little thicker. I really like the cross reference system of the concord

  • @Twiceborn_by_grace
    @Twiceborn_by_grace 2 года назад +2

    I don’t know if all bibles get this after awhile or if it just cheaper bibles, but what causes that white speckling on the gold or silver page edges?

  • @gleasonparker1684
    @gleasonparker1684 3 года назад +2

    CAMBRIDGE goatskin does not seem as floppy as most. But I prefer calfskin or calfsplit when I can get it.
    Only CONCORD can make an 8 point font look readable with bold and dark text. ..for the KJV at least.

  • @MarcellHobbs
    @MarcellHobbs 4 года назад +1

    I have the Concord KJV Marbled Mahogany in my cart now. Looking for more reviews before committing the $ 💖

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  4 года назад +2

      Check out the latest video from Cat Woods... she just did an unboxing!

    • @MarcellHobbs
      @MarcellHobbs 4 года назад

      Tim Wildsmith Yes, that is how I found your channel. She mentioned you!

  • @AVKingJamesBible
    @AVKingJamesBible 3 года назад +2

    I have a Concorde in block goatskin which I LOVE! I do also want one in French Morocco leather (as my take-outdoors Bible). I understand they did use to make one in this leather at one point, but I have been unsuccessful in finding one. Any thoughts?

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  3 года назад

      I think they used to, but I’m not sure if it’s currently in print.

  • @BiblicalStudiesandReviews
    @BiblicalStudiesandReviews 4 года назад +1

    The Concord is a wonderful Bible.

  • @philipmelgren4469
    @philipmelgren4469 4 года назад +2

    How does this concordance stack up against the R L Allan Cyclopedic concordance? Be interested in your observations. Thanks.

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  4 года назад +1

      The Concord concordance is solid and pretty straightforward. It's great that the Bible includes the glossary and dictionary as well. Combine those three, and it's much closer to the Cyclopedic Concordance than it would be with just the standard concordance. That said, the Cyclopedic still feels more expansive to me, with its own unique content.

  • @ayonmaity6150
    @ayonmaity6150 3 года назад +2

    Sir can you tell me what is the meaning given in the Concise Bible Dictionary section? Thank you so much for doing this review ❤️. God's grace be upon you and your family ✝️✝️✝️

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  3 года назад +1

      It’s a dictionary of terms that is brief.

    • @ayonmaity6150
      @ayonmaity6150 3 года назад

      @@timwildsmith Ahh ok Sir that means the word 'Lucifer' is not defined there right?

  • @kolsonmaddox777
    @kolsonmaddox777 2 года назад +1

    Is the liner a leather liner or synthetic liner on the goatskin?

  • @jmsamborski
    @jmsamborski Год назад +1

    The inner margins on this seem to be the tightest of any Bible I've seen reviewed. It's perplexing to me that no one is mentioning it. On video it looks like the text is so far in the gutter that you'd have to constantly stretch and fight the book to read it.

  • @lorelei23
    @lorelei23 3 года назад +1

    May I ask how Philippians 4:4 reads in this bible? Is it "alway" or "always"?

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  3 года назад

      I don’t have this one on me anymore. Sorry!

    • @lorelei23
      @lorelei23 3 года назад

      @@timwildsmith Oh no worries!

    • @kolsonmaddox777
      @kolsonmaddox777 2 года назад

      I know it’s been a year since you posted this comment. But it says “alway”

    • @lorelei23
      @lorelei23 2 года назад +1

      @@kolsonmaddox777 I appreciate that. Thanks so much!

  • @eyeonart6865
    @eyeonart6865 2 года назад +1

    They need an edition with the Concord but no dictionary use that for blank note paper!

  • @eyeonart6865
    @eyeonart6865 2 года назад +1

    Cambridge does bibles right everyone else does it cheap!

    • @timwildsmith
      @timwildsmith  2 года назад

      Check out the other videos of my channel… lots of publishers who do it really great!