With my 130SLT this evening first time go peeps. Saw Jupiter clearly no red spot but clearly see cloud rings. As well as 3 moons. Also saw Saturn could see the space between the rings and the planet. I’ve never seen this. I feel small and meaningless after that. And you know what…it was amazing. Doing that again!!!!
Please show the actual pictures made by those scopes for comparison. And there is no explanation of differences between 3 those models: refractor, Maks and reflector - their cons and pros. Not helpful for making an informed buying decision. I just decided the bigger is better (plus cheaper), so I went for 130 SLT, but was quite disappointed in the magnification with included eyepieces - only about 70 max. Shall use an additional Barlow lens to get a decent magnification. My next one would be 8" on computerized equatorial stand - the dream of beginner astronomers/astrophotographers, but for now will play with my 130 SLT - seems like a good quality affordable computerized scope anyway.
Thank you for the video, though there is something I feel I should point out, I really don't think you can see Mars polar ice caps bc I have a 130 slt myself and I was just barely able to see the ice caps on this years perihelion. I don't have any of the other ones but I don't think you'd be able to see the ice caps with the other ones. I can however confirm that the 130 slt is good for brighter deep sky objects. I have seen andromeda, Hercules cluster, wild duck cluster, 4 other globalur clusters, the dumbell nebula, blinking planetary nebula, ring nebula, double cluster, owl cluster, some of the cave nebula, the stars of the north American nebula, orion nebula, and much more. The best ones are either the 127 or the 130 though I feel it depends on what you want to see. If you want to get real up close to stuff then go with the 127, if you like wide, quality views of star clusters and nebulae then go the 130 slt route, and if you like to have the best quality possible go with the 102, if you want something of good quality that you can just grab and go then choose the 90. Also if you get one of these the wifi module is an absolute must if you want to get the most out of these.
@B.6 No worries, but it isn't like advertised, you CAN see the ice caps, but only with additional accessories and good seeing conditions, you can make them out with just the stuff that comes with it, but they are unimaginably small unless you get accessories for it, most important ones being a x2 barlow and color filters. When you have the right accessories I have seen Saturn's Cassini ring division and Jupiters great red spot as well as various mountain ranges and the ice caps on mars.
hello, you might not see this but i was wondering, where can i get like the anti vibration pads, like is there a link for some on amazon? well any cheap ones because i wasted quite alot on my 130 slt.
I think you mean NexStar SE or NexStar SLT. It depends upon what you want to observe from your scope. If you are buying lower end of SE series such as 4SE, then better go for 127 or 130 SLT as it has a bigger aperture and same price range. If you have bigger budget then definitely go for 6SE or 8SE
Hey I have a question where can i buy the 130 because i already have a 90 but i just want to change the thing from where i see the sky (sorry i am not english so i don't know how to say it)
With my 130SLT this evening first time go peeps. Saw Jupiter clearly no red spot but clearly see cloud rings. As well as 3 moons. Also saw Saturn could see the space between the rings and the planet. I’ve never seen this. I feel small and meaningless after that. And you know what…it was amazing. Doing that again!!!!
Watching the 127 and 130 on auction. Right now both about $60 but will see. Might have to buy both lol
Excellent. The best review I saw about these telescopes.
Please show the actual pictures made by those scopes for comparison. And there is no explanation of differences between 3 those models: refractor, Maks and reflector - their cons and pros. Not helpful for making an informed buying decision. I just decided the bigger is better (plus cheaper), so I went for 130 SLT, but was quite disappointed in the magnification with included eyepieces - only about 70 max. Shall use an additional Barlow lens to get a decent magnification. My next one would be 8" on computerized equatorial stand - the dream of beginner astronomers/astrophotographers, but for now will play with my 130 SLT - seems like a good quality affordable computerized scope anyway.
they don't mention anything about the glass or mirror quality too
Is there a noticeable difference in views between the 102mm refractor and 127mm Mak? The 102mm is often selling for less.
Thank you for the video, though there is something I feel I should point out, I really don't think you can see Mars polar ice caps bc I have a 130 slt myself and I was just barely able to see the ice caps on this years perihelion. I don't have any of the other ones but I don't think you'd be able to see the ice caps with the other ones. I can however confirm that the 130 slt is good for brighter deep sky objects. I have seen andromeda, Hercules cluster, wild duck cluster, 4 other globalur clusters, the dumbell nebula, blinking planetary nebula, ring nebula, double cluster, owl cluster, some of the cave nebula, the stars of the north American nebula, orion nebula, and much more. The best ones are either the 127 or the 130 though I feel it depends on what you want to see. If you want to get real up close to stuff then go with the 127, if you like wide, quality views of star clusters and nebulae then go the 130 slt route, and if you like to have the best quality possible go with the 102, if you want something of good quality that you can just grab and go then choose the 90. Also if you get one of these the wifi module is an absolute must if you want to get the most out of these.
@B.6 Only light pollution I have is 2 nearby street lamps and I live in bortle 5, though when I observe my house blocks one of the streetlamps
@B.6 No worries, but it isn't like advertised, you CAN see the ice caps, but only with additional accessories and good seeing conditions, you can make them out with just the stuff that comes with it, but they are unimaginably small unless you get accessories for it, most important ones being a x2 barlow and color filters. When you have the right accessories I have seen Saturn's Cassini ring division and Jupiters great red spot as well as various mountain ranges and the ice caps on mars.
This dude is cracked lol
Question, are you seeing all of these with your bare eye, or through some camera. And which ine
So the SLT (star location telescope) series software will locate and follow any object in the solar system, if set up correctly?
Yes
@@Ludspo No, the sky contains a few more objects than 4000 🤣
@@dalelc43 SOLAR SYSTEM
I want to buy a telescope, 127slt or 130slt is better?? Thanks
From these two go for 130slt.
hello, you might not see this but i was wondering, where can i get like the anti vibration pads, like is there a link for some on amazon? well any cheap ones because i wasted quite alot on my 130 slt.
Check out the link in the description
what about 150slt??
Thanks a lot!!!
They say don't expect the best views, then show you images from hubble lol. I have the 127 slt. It's OK just kinda limiting due to its high f- stop
Sir please help which series is best nexstar or slt
I think you mean NexStar SE or NexStar SLT.
It depends upon what you want to observe from your scope.
If you are buying lower end of SE series such as 4SE, then better go for 127 or 130 SLT as it has a bigger aperture and same price range.
If you have bigger budget then definitely go for 6SE or 8SE
Hey I have a question where can i buy the 130 because i already have a 90 but i just want to change the thing from where i see the sky (sorry i am not english so i don't know how to say it)
Are you talking about eye pieces?
would you go for the celestron nexstar 102 or the nexstar 6se ? 6se is higher price range. would you say they are similar?
NexStar 6SE,
No, 6SE is better than CN SLT102
nice video, i just subbed i alsao have a astro channel, i check out more videos on yours.
Guess I’m just going to wait for my slt130 I will tell you if you can see those locations or not (; happy hunting people
Hi, how good was the telescope?
Would have helped if you used inch's instead of mm.
Telescopes use millimeters
Privilege
if he did that than id be the one to say you should of used mm instead of inches.
you can type the value into google toolbar to convert easy enough.
really!?