People don't fully understand what James Cameron has done with his films. He has changed the way we all look at movies today, whether we know it or not. His groundbreaking use of 3D storytelling has been present since The Terminator. Camerons 3D magic was there in Aliens when he used numbers. You won't notice the numbers because the writing, directing and cinematography is so freaking good. In short, James Cameron is the greatest magician in Hollywood. If these "more artistic" filmmakers applied 1/10th of what I know from watching Camerons films, their films would be just as timeless and unforgettable. Michael Bay isn't the king of anything. If you put Cameron next to Steven Spielberg, then you have something. Even though, Cameron is more of a master filmmaker than Spielberg could ever hope to be. Cameron makes the fine dining addictive. He doesn't half-a** every shot like Bay. The attention of detail you talk about with fine dining is literally all over every shot. That kind of genius isnt even in a Spielberg film. Not even his most pretentious movies. Cameron keeps his fine dining from becoming pretentious. You're problem is that you're too pretentious to look any deeper into a Cameron film. To suggest that Camerons film isn't even fine dining is absurd. Titanic is fast food?? What a pretentious idiot.
My taste in dining matches my taste in film. Hate: fast food and fine dining Love: home cooked meals and mid-range/non-chain restaurants (especially when they serve interesting takes on fast food)
I like these most of these descriptions, but personally I wouldn’t call fast food easy to digest, that shit absolutely wrecks your gut and your plumbing
I think I’m 40% Fine Dining, 40% Fast Food and 20% Home cooked. I struggle a little bit with Home Cooked because I usually can’t figure out whether it should be considered an artistic or a commercial film. Nice video btw 😊
What a perfect explanation of cinema. 35% homecooked, 35% Fine dining, 30% fast food. Fast food often takes the place of generic cultural relevance so i feel its more relevant than most cinephiles give it credit for.
I'm pretty sure I lean largely towards "fast food" and "home cooked" in my cinematic diet, although I admit I'm not always sure which movies fall in which categories. And as you said, there are good and bad movies in all three categories.
I tend to watch fine dining once a year during oscar season to expand my palate and then balance the rest of the year with block busters and home cooked meals. So id say 40 block buster 40 home cooked and 20 fine dining
I love experiencing fast food with my family. It's a major bonding moment - just like food. But when I'm on my own, I enjoy home-cooked meals, where I can enjoy and reflect on a movie at my own pace.
When it comes to movies I’m mostly home cooked, but I do like some fast food or fine dining every now and then. I can be classy and trashy, I’m not a snob, if I like a movie I like a movie.
These were my last watched: Megalopolis (2024) A Man For All Seasons (1966) Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009) To Have and Have Not (1944) Gilda (1946) Border Incident (1949) Deathtrap (1982) The Asphalt Jungle (1950) The Killers (1946) Tomorrow Is Another Day (1951) What do you think of my diet? Thank you for the great video, you earned yourself a new subscriber.
I would say stuff like Transformers movies, Disney movies, Superhero movies, Star Wars, most Comedy movies are more Chocolate/Sweets. Stuff like Action movies, Sci-fi movies, Disaster movies, are more McDonald’s/Burger King etc etc.
Honestly Home Cooked are the best And I would say movies like Winter Soldier, Top Gun 2 or Terminator 2 are the perfect balance between Fast Food and Home Cooked, while movies like Arrival and Kurosawa's are in the middle of Home Cooked and Fine Dining Robocop would also be home cooked for me, John Wick too...maybe leaning towards fast food but its too well done
Jonathan Glazer, Pete Docter, Miyazaki, Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, John Frankenheimer, Satyajit Ray, Preston Sturges, Howard Hawks - I can eat them all without suffering indigestion. For a dessert, I can indulge myself on Michael Curtiz, Alfred Hitchcock, Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin. But whenever I think about Christopher Nolan, James Cameron, Quentin Tarantino, Del Toro, Tim Burton and Pedro Almodovar I start to get stomach cramps. With certain offerings of Spielberg and Scorsese I am in need of hospitalisation
Hes a douche chef who on his day off promises a full 5 course meal, says dinners at 7, finally serves it a 11 and shrugs and tells you there's no dessert at the end.
Can you extrapolate this Metaphor to other 'Periods' of Hollywood History? Such as when Film was emerging before Genre's and 'understandings' of The Blockbuster, Art Movie, and Middle Ground or Fast Food, Fine, and Home Cooked, came to be or we're 'still evolving' as Concepts for Cinematic Direction? Like I dunno... The Golden Age of Hollywood, The Immediate Period After US V.S. Paramount Pictures and the Rise of Indies, or the Public Domain's Film Catalog from...well the Dawn of Cinema to 1928 going on 1929 in a Year? And what exactly 'that' would look like?
50 percent of Fast Food 50 percent of Fine Dining 50 percent of Homecooked Edit: Just kidding 😂 It's actually 15 percent of Fast Food 20 percent of Fine Dining 15 percent of Homecooked
@@stefan24georgiev high production value, yes, as in essence it was a little bit deeper than surface level, because there is a theme about human arrogance, but that is all, I almost never found a romance based movie as deeper than surface level, there are many out there but for me Titanic isn't that. It was on a category of pretentious fine dining for me. (does not mean it was not well made)
@@franciscoramadhan9156 yes not that deep ideas, but James Cameron made you experience the phenomenology of finding a "soulmate" on the titanic, and then the phenomenology of disaster. So from that perspective it is really one of the most well made movies because it has experiential value. To me deep intellectual ideas in movies are fine ,but rarely does a movie get you to participate viscerally in a movie and to me that is not fast food.
@@stefan24georgievTitanic is a well filmed and directed movie that just checks all of the wrong boxes for me. The length wears me down, the melodrama on the end gets to be too much for me, and the worst part for me is the "love story". Structurally for me, it is a time bloated historical cheating disaster movie. But I am often an accidental contrarian, so view accordingly. I tend to not watch a lot of mainstream hits, unless other people want to.
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
The algorithm randomly served me this delicious home cooked snack of a video! Looking forward to more dishes from this chef! :)
I will do my best :)
Fantastic video! I would say my diet is 70% home cooked meals. 20% fine dining. 10% fast food.
Putting James Cameron in the same sentance as Michael Bay is criminal
I agree, I am a criminal
People don't fully understand what James Cameron has done with his films. He has changed the way we all look at movies today, whether we know it or not. His groundbreaking use of 3D storytelling has been present since The Terminator.
Camerons 3D magic was there in Aliens when he used numbers. You won't notice the numbers because the writing, directing and cinematography is so freaking good. In short, James Cameron is the greatest magician in Hollywood.
If these "more artistic" filmmakers applied 1/10th of what I know from watching Camerons films, their films would be just as timeless and unforgettable. Michael Bay isn't the king of anything. If you put Cameron next to Steven Spielberg, then you have something. Even though, Cameron is more of a master filmmaker than Spielberg could ever hope to be.
Cameron makes the fine dining addictive. He doesn't half-a** every shot like Bay. The attention of detail you talk about with fine dining is literally all over every shot. That kind of genius isnt even in a Spielberg film. Not even his most pretentious movies. Cameron keeps his fine dining from becoming pretentious.
You're problem is that you're too pretentious to look any deeper into a Cameron film. To suggest that Camerons film isn't even fine dining is absurd. Titanic is fast food?? What a pretentious idiot.
@@LukeLovesRose damn bro who hurt you
@@LukeLovesRosein terms the movies itself Yes Avatar is Fast Food, JC is the cook, Heis fin dining movies cis Titanic arguably
But so funny....
My taste in dining matches my taste in film.
Hate: fast food and fine dining
Love: home cooked meals and mid-range/non-chain restaurants (especially when they serve interesting takes on fast food)
I like these most of these descriptions, but personally I wouldn’t call fast food easy to digest, that shit absolutely wrecks your gut and your plumbing
I think I’m 40% Fine Dining, 40% Fast Food and 20% Home cooked. I struggle a little bit with Home Cooked because I usually can’t figure out whether it should be considered an artistic or a commercial film.
Nice video btw 😊
Valid Point about Homecooked Movies :)
What a perfect explanation of cinema. 35% homecooked, 35% Fine dining, 30% fast food. Fast food often takes the place of generic cultural relevance so i feel its more relevant than most cinephiles give it credit for.
Denis villeneve( idk how to spell) is one of my recent new favorite director
I'm pretty sure I lean largely towards "fast food" and "home cooked" in my cinematic diet, although I admit I'm not always sure which movies fall in which categories. And as you said, there are good and bad movies in all three categories.
70% Homecooked, 10% Fine Dining and 20% Fast food. All before the 2000s. That's mostly just last week's leftovers.
15% fine dining, 85% homecooked
50% fine dining % 50 homecooked
I tend to watch fine dining once a year during oscar season to expand my palate and then balance the rest of the year with block busters and home cooked meals. So id say 40 block buster 40 home cooked and 20 fine dining
I love experiencing fast food with my family. It's a major bonding moment - just like food. But when I'm on my own, I enjoy home-cooked meals, where I can enjoy and reflect on a movie at my own pace.
When it comes to movies I’m mostly home cooked, but I do like some fast food or fine dining every now and then.
I can be classy and trashy, I’m not a snob, if I like a movie I like a movie.
I feel the same way
This video is amazing!
PS. Homecooked meals are the best 😊
These were my last watched:
Megalopolis (2024)
A Man For All Seasons (1966)
Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009)
To Have and Have Not (1944)
Gilda (1946)
Border Incident (1949)
Deathtrap (1982)
The Asphalt Jungle (1950)
The Killers (1946)
Tomorrow Is Another Day (1951)
What do you think of my diet?
Thank you for the great video, you earned yourself a new subscriber.
i think i'm 65% homecooked 25%fine dining and 10% fast food.
Probably 50% homecooked, 30% Fastfood and 20% FIne Dining
Homecooked movies are the best :)
I would say stuff like Transformers movies, Disney movies, Superhero movies, Star Wars, most Comedy movies are more Chocolate/Sweets.
Stuff like Action movies, Sci-fi movies, Disaster movies, are more McDonald’s/Burger King etc etc.
love to see small channels make quality content. Keep it up man i can success in your future
Thank you! comments like this makes me want to make more :)
Honestly Home Cooked are the best
And I would say movies like Winter Soldier, Top Gun 2 or Terminator 2 are the perfect balance between Fast Food and Home Cooked, while movies like Arrival and Kurosawa's are in the middle of Home Cooked and Fine Dining
Robocop would also be home cooked for me, John Wick too...maybe leaning towards fast food but its too well done
I guess Im 55% Home Cooked, 30% Fast Food and 15% Fine Dining, yeah...
mmm stalker... 3 michelin stars :)
not gonna lie though, i also love me some hobo with a shotgun burgers :D
hobo with a shotgun burgers are definitely street food
I saw the Turin Horse and while I found it dull (the point of the movie), I did appreciate what he was trying to get at
Jonathan Glazer, Pete Docter, Miyazaki, Tarkovsky, Kurosawa, John Frankenheimer, Satyajit Ray, Preston Sturges, Howard Hawks - I can eat them all without suffering indigestion. For a dessert, I can indulge myself on Michael Curtiz, Alfred Hitchcock, Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin. But whenever I think about Christopher Nolan, James Cameron, Quentin Tarantino, Del Toro, Tim Burton and Pedro Almodovar I start to get stomach cramps. With certain offerings of Spielberg and Scorsese I am in need of hospitalisation
Stomach cramps?? From what?
You have impeccable taste ! Have not watch any of John Frankenheimer's films, Where do you think would be a good way to start?
You guys have to be trolling now. Frankenheimer?? The same guy behind Reindeer games is a better filmmaker than Cameron or Scorsese??
@@Moviemills101The Manchurian Candidate
Too pretentious...
What category do you think Quentin Tarantino fits into?
Homecooked Movies
Hes a douche chef who on his day off promises a full 5 course meal, says dinners at 7, finally serves it a 11 and shrugs and tells you there's no dessert at the end.
The cheapest of fast food, desperately trying to emulate the ones who were there first, and adding too much sauce and not enough meat.
He's a buffet.
@@CrazyMazapan lol what a pathetic hater
50% homecooked
30% fine dining
20% fast food
Also, how does Southland Tales fit into the fine dining section of films?
It's always funny to hear english speaking people trying to pronounce "Villeneuve", anyway great video
Hopefully I don't botch other names in the future videos :)
I will take fine dining whenever i want to feel "smart" 😁
I like this video!
Can you extrapolate this Metaphor to other 'Periods' of Hollywood History? Such as when Film was emerging before Genre's and 'understandings' of The Blockbuster, Art Movie, and Middle Ground or Fast Food, Fine, and Home Cooked, came to be or we're 'still evolving' as Concepts for Cinematic Direction?
Like I dunno... The Golden Age of Hollywood, The Immediate Period After US V.S. Paramount Pictures and the Rise of Indies, or the Public Domain's Film Catalog from...well the Dawn of Cinema to 1928 going on 1929 in a Year?
And what exactly 'that' would look like?
What is the fifth film at 7:20? I guess I'm 60% fine dining, 30% homecook and 10% fast food.
Comrades, Almost a Love Story ! I highly recommend it!
The best movie adaptations of Shakespeare's Hamlet, to what food are they equivalent?
Fine dinning, without doubt
What movies would be a cinema equivalent to Middle-Earth Hobbit cuisine?
Ill stick to fast food
All James Cameron movies are fine dining and home cooked
I respect your opinion :)
50 percent of Fast Food
50 percent of Fine Dining
50 percent of Homecooked
Edit: Just kidding 😂
It's actually
15 percent of Fast Food
20 percent of Fine Dining
15 percent of Homecooked
By definition you can't have more than 100%.
@@Stratmanable it was a joke
It's actually
15% Fast Food
20% Fine Dining
15% Homecooked
Are there movies which are equivalent to exotic "delicacies"?
Memories of murder, Bergman movies, Y Tu mama tambien
sure but disclaimeer
Titanic is not fast food.
You're right. Titanic is the diarrhea you get from eating fast food.
@@Stratmanable why do you hate Titanic so much? Its a well made movie
@@stefan24georgiev high production value, yes, as in essence it was a little bit deeper than surface level, because there is a theme about human arrogance, but that is all, I almost never found a romance based movie as deeper than surface level, there are many out there but for me Titanic isn't that. It was on a category of pretentious fine dining for me. (does not mean it was not well made)
@@franciscoramadhan9156 yes not that deep ideas, but James Cameron made you experience the phenomenology of finding a "soulmate" on the titanic, and then the phenomenology of disaster. So from that perspective it is really one of the most well made movies because it has experiential value. To me deep intellectual ideas in movies are fine ,but rarely does a movie get you to participate viscerally in a movie and to me that is not fast food.
@@stefan24georgievTitanic is a well filmed and directed movie that just checks all of the wrong boxes for me. The length wears me down, the melodrama on the end gets to be too much for me, and the worst part for me is the "love story". Structurally for me, it is a time bloated historical cheating disaster movie.
But I am often an accidental contrarian, so view accordingly. I tend to not watch a lot of mainstream hits, unless other people want to.
2nd time watching this video...
I like this video!