Then Turkey and Israel should do the same no? Or does it only apply to one side of the equation? If Azerbaijan arms itself to its teeth and continues to threaten one of its neighbors, that neighbor has every right to prepare defense. Azerbaijan, btw, is not Indias friend, it is a brother of Pakistan, same as turkey- So you go figure for yourself why India should even increase its support for Armenia.
@@davidweber7153 obviously. Geopolitics isnt a constant equation. India and iran have good relations but houthis are attacking indian ships. Azerbaijan has a much larger army few imported weapons won't help Armenia. Indian weapons risk getting captured and handed to pakistan. Nothing is permanent in geopolitics. India hasnt engaged with azerbaijan like turkey and qatar. Azerbaijans rightful claim on territory has to be accepted. Because in conflict only nukes can save Armenia which indians have no courage to give.
@@abhi739 What kind of nonsense. First Azerbaijans current aim is rightful Armenian territory, they literally threaten even Yerevan. Go and do your homework. Second, yes in a defensive war a couple good Systems can cost the aggressor many more resources and men to break through so it acts as a deterrent and combined with French Arms and Training it will be very unlikely that Azerbaijan can afford another aggressive war. "Only nukes can save Armenia"? I'm sorry but you lack basic common sense if that is your conclusion. You talk like you understand geopolitics, but fail to understand the basic concept of power balance.
@@davidweber7153 Thats a perspective, maps keep changing, now ngorno is inside azerbaijan the claim has shifted, not for India to decide, its in irans interest to block red sea and armtwist India to use Armenia route. India can ask azerbaijan to guarantee safety of passage in exchange for Irans committment at red sea. Weapons never decide a war US USSR tried in afghanistan and failed, India dont have volume of arms production to match azerbaijan and turkey. Only nuclear deterrance saves armenia, otherwise next phase armenia might dissapear
You are truly ignorant. You keep referring to NK, when I am talking about Azeri claims on Yerevan itself. The NK situation is over, Armenia has no claims on it, but wants to see the population move back and live in peace. Weapons do win, and India is the 3d largest Military power globally, to state it does not have the capacity to match Azerbaijan is a either a joke or an insult. Again you limited thinking and understanding makes you think the Nuclear option is the only one. I don't blame you, but your teachers.
Armenia is a victim of aggression. India must export Tejas jets and drones.
armenia is the aggressor
be quite pajet
@@vizibilibende5194 you first, mongol
India should transfer missile technology to Armenia
Yes we should
Defence India growing power
Indian missile technology is one of the best in the world
Pakistan already supplied to same country 🙄🤔 Shocking !!
What is this weapon😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😢😂😂😂😂😂
Missile technology
Toilets 😂😂
We have become the world's biggest beef exporter 😂😂😂😂😂
No way in defence........
All tenders for adani ambani......
Try barbque hamburger 🤤 once you eat never stop eating
@@abhi739 we shall both......
@@maaaaaaaa8185 tasty ghee hamburger 🤤 with chilled beer 🍻 heaven
India should try to mediate peace between Armenia Azerbaijan not sell weapons. Azerbaijan Israel are friends and both are indias partners
Then Turkey and Israel should do the same no? Or does it only apply to one side of the equation? If Azerbaijan arms itself to its teeth and continues to threaten one of its neighbors, that neighbor has every right to prepare defense.
Azerbaijan, btw, is not Indias friend, it is a brother of Pakistan, same as turkey- So you go figure for yourself why India should even increase its support for Armenia.
@@davidweber7153 obviously. Geopolitics isnt a constant equation. India and iran have good relations but houthis are attacking indian ships. Azerbaijan has a much larger army few imported weapons won't help Armenia. Indian weapons risk getting captured and handed to pakistan.
Nothing is permanent in geopolitics. India hasnt engaged with azerbaijan like turkey and qatar. Azerbaijans rightful claim on territory has to be accepted. Because in conflict only nukes can save Armenia which indians have no courage to give.
@@abhi739 What kind of nonsense. First Azerbaijans current aim is rightful Armenian territory, they literally threaten even Yerevan. Go and do your homework. Second, yes in a defensive war a couple good Systems can cost the aggressor many more resources and men to break through so it acts as a deterrent and combined with French Arms and Training it will be very unlikely that Azerbaijan can afford another aggressive war. "Only nukes can save Armenia"? I'm sorry but you lack basic common sense if that is your conclusion. You talk like you understand geopolitics, but fail to understand the basic concept of power balance.
@@davidweber7153 Thats a perspective, maps keep changing, now ngorno is inside azerbaijan the claim has shifted, not for India to decide, its in irans interest to block red sea and armtwist India to use Armenia route. India can ask azerbaijan to guarantee safety of passage in exchange for Irans committment at red sea.
Weapons never decide a war US USSR tried in afghanistan and failed, India dont have volume of arms production to match azerbaijan and turkey. Only nuclear deterrance saves armenia, otherwise next phase armenia might dissapear
You are truly ignorant. You keep referring to NK, when I am talking about Azeri claims on Yerevan itself. The NK situation is over, Armenia has no claims on it, but wants to see the population move back and live in peace.
Weapons do win, and India is the 3d largest Military power globally, to state it does not have the capacity to match Azerbaijan is a either a joke or an insult. Again you limited thinking and understanding makes you think the Nuclear option is the only one. I don't blame you, but your teachers.
😂