I love how X90 Pro+ can capture very bright/white object and shows its brightness without clipping. For video, I actually think Vivo is doing it better as well. Now waiting for your X90 Pro+ vs iPhone 14 Pro Max video😄
Daylight, basically the same with few differences in between. Ultrawide, day same. Zoom still goes to Vivo for detail but S22U has better ranges. Front camera day, still Samsung. Pro mode is good for adjusting Samsung's profile a bit. Night I do prefer Samsung's for their "realism" where night is basically dark since as good as Vivo for brightening up the shot, it makes night mode redundant. It does flip between colours so each may be preferred differently. Video bright on Samsung but fuzzy and dark on Vivo but cleaner. Overall both are equally capable. It doesn't matter which to get. Makes me more excited for the S23 Ultra now.
lol samsung has better zoom range? try taking a pic at 5x or 9x, it will look unusable, not to mention in dim light it doesn't even use those sensors because that's how tiny they are. on night again vivo destroys it, you can darken a pic anytime if you want it darker but good luck brightening up the samsung pic when it lacks tons of details.
@@adyady3099 zoom range and zoom quality are two different thing. I never said Samsung has the better quality. And yes. We brighten the photos with night mode. What'd you think that mode was made for? Astrophotography?
@@joelconolly5574 why reiterate what he said? In your OP you said you prefer Samsung's night mode because it's darker. He replied stating you can always darken a picture using editing software, however you can't do the opposite (brighten) without losing detail... Are you a simpleton? Vivo is clearly superior here.
Lol sorry I've owned an S22 ultra..(sold it) Samsung wasn't even a top 5 when it came to photos before the vivo came out I now own a vivo x90 pro plus and it's not even close. It's nice taking a photo and not have to worry about shutter lag
samsung has stopped trying in the last years especially after huawei ban because they know people will still buy so is no surprise that vivo is better, mate 50 pro is pretty much on pair with vivo, even pixel is better at camera than samsung
thanks for the review, and also for taking into account the comments on the previous review! By comparison, it is clear that Samsung is not a competitor to Vivo. The difference is too big. Samsung is still using their old algorithms from 2014 or even earlier. This results in unnatural faded colors, poor midtones, oversharpening and watercolors. Noise reduction also works very hard and eats up details. However, this approach is sometimes justified and allows, in some cases, when vivo makes a mistake with the focus, to get more interesting photos. According to the video, especially in low light, there’s nothing to even say - the Samsung can’t oppose anything. Vivo is another level. However, its cameras also have drawbacks (the focus sometimes does not work correctly and the DR in the video is strangely set towards overexposure of bright objects, especially on night videos). To minimize the problem with autofocus as much as possible, I resort to a trick. In the shutter settings, check the "touch" box and when taking a picture, do it not only with the shutter button, but directly tap on the place of the frame that you need in focus. In this case, the phone reexposes and refocuses the picture, and since this takes several tens of milliseconds, during this time the micro-shaking of the phone caused by tapping on the screen will already disappear and you will get a guaranteed clear picture of what you wanted.
Also, the video is too much oversharpened on vivo. It is necessary to reduce the level of sharpness on vivo in the following firmware. Another HORRIBLE problem for video shooting is the zoom slider. This is simply unacceptable. I know a lot of people who love to shoot videos and they will never buy a phone with such a zoom! It's terribly inconvenient. you want to FAST increase to the next physical sensor, say from 0.6 to 1 and you end up aiming at that slider, move it carefully so you don't overzoom and you overszoom anyway. In this case, you lose concentration on the subject! And if you went too far, then you need to zoom back and here you can also make a mistake. Firstly, it's damn inconvenient, secondly, you get a result that is terrible and you will need to cut these moments from the video ... Can the problem be fixed? EASY! it can be done in one update. The algorithm of the slider needs to be improved (it is desirable to do this in the same way as an iPhone zooms - this is an ideal zoom), but the MAIN thing is that in addition to the slider, you need to leave buttons for instant switching between modules. if I need to slightly increase the frame within one module, I will do it with a slider, but I would like to do the switching between modules instantly with a button. There is another reason for this. Let's say you shoot on the x2 module. want to switch to x3.5. Now for this you need to move the slider. So, up to x3.4, the x2 module will work for you and the picture will be just a crop from this sensor, and by this moment it will be just terrible quality. And then a sharp jump in quality when you switch to x3.5. Yes, x90pro plus modules are of very good quality and the jumps are almost invisible, but nevertheless they are. If you switch between modules with buttons, then this problem will simply not happen when shooting in 99% of cases (well, unless you yourself specifically do it with a slider ...) I really don’t understand - is it really that no one shoots a video in vivo? how do they test and develop their cameras? the feeling that they are doing it exclusively for photos on the social network. And it's sad, because hardware this phone is PERFECT. however, the software does not always correspond to it ... I beg you to make a video and preferably with a clickbait title and show on it how terribly inconvenient it is to use zoom in a Vivo camera and show how convenient it is to use zoom on an iPhone or Samsung. The quality of the shooting is important, but it is equally important to have the convenience of doing so. Interestingly, Vivo has one of the best and most understandable interfaces for the camera, but I don’t understand how they could screw up the zoom slider like that ...
Just received the Vivo about 10 days ago and its camera system (with image and vdo processing) is amazing. I can only directly compare with the Samsungs S21 Ultra and the Huawei Mate 30 Pro that I own but this is quite a big step up from their level to the Vivo X90 Pro Plus... also considering all the other aspects of a smart phone (performance, battery, charging time, etc, etc...)...
Your camera comparisons are one of the best if not the best out there! I'm so amazed by the cinematic video mode of the Vivo, because it looks so natural. On the Pixel 7 Pro it looks ridiculously unnatural and on the Galaxy SEE Ultra it also looks a bit unnatural! Have to do some videos in the cinematic mode with my X90 Pro+ soon
Another great video comparison, thank you for you hard work!!! Interesting to see how Vivo's strategy of more megapixels vs optical zoom on the S22 stacks up. The 10x zoom used to be the main advantage of the S22 which no other phone could touch. Vivo managed to get close to the point of the difference being negligible - check 4:30. The Samsung cameras might seem sharper generally, but this is just down to processing - in my eyes they are oversharpened. I much prefer the Vivo balance and to do my own sharpening if needed. So excited for this phone's global release!!!!
Unfortunately there won't be a global release! Only the X90 and X90 Pro will be globally available at least in the beginning. Hopefully they change their mind later on
@@flo_h_96 just read the news. Absolute insanity if it's not released globally. We care about the Vivo because of the cameras, so no way sales of the lesser camera phones are going to be high. They do hint a telescope lens in the release campaign though. Only the pro+ has that
@@flo_h_96 I really wonder what is Vivo's rationale. Anyway, if there is no global release, I will import from China. Seems there is no issue with the 4g/5g bands and Origin OS seems better than Funtouch. Apart from lack of warranty, I see no downsides
@@winther5 yes, would be interesting to hear why they are not releasing it globally. I imported it from china! It supports all 4G/5G bands so there is no issue. Origin OS is definitely better than Funtouch OS, but I underestimate how much work it was to get rid of most of the chinese bloatware and get all the settings right. If you want to get rid of everything chinese it's even more work. But it also depends if you have already done the set up process of such a phone and know what to do or if you do it the first time like me! But if everything is done it's definitely worth it. The phone is amazing and at the same time quite cheap compared to most of the flagship phones from other brands
The 10x on s22 ultra is miles better than the vivo though...the vivo just produced a digitally processed 10x video wheras the Samsung has an optical one.... The vivo does good but it's too oversharpened n it looks digitally processed which it is
@@akagetobimaru1994 so you wanna tell me the 10x shot at 4:00 from samsung is better? WTF also the shot 10x shot at 4:09 if he didnt shake looks much more natural on the vivo. 20x therefore samsung uses its software and than wins again, but 10x shots from samsung are just bad for a dedicated 10x telephoto For the video yeah there you can see the digitaly processing of the vivo here samsung cleary wins at 10x
As a Samsung fan it's hard but I have to admit that the Vivo is better, especially in night photo-video 😔 You can see clearly and especially at night that the Vivo has a much better hardware, and also the software aspect is really on the level 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 On the other hand, the Vivo is strangely bad in night selfie 🤔 Samsung really has a serious competitor there to its upcoming S23 Ultra, and I hope they can rise to the challenge 🤞🏽, even though I'm not a fan of all those 108 and 200mpx sensors and don't believe in their usefulness.
Well well, vivo is shockingly better than what I consider a pretty good camera phone😮😮. The. VIVO should be facing the iPhone and Pixel. Really surprised 😯
In addition, can you provide information about the POSITION SOFTWARE version used? And what is the software, the final software? because the software update determines the camera results
I remember that i have been watching your channel since was 10k subscribers. Always thanks for your effort, it really helps tech fans make right choice. Especially guys who are in south korea, (like me) cannot directly look or touch various phones except 🍎 or samsung. Hope you keep safe, and HPNY Ps. It's so weird vivo's hdr algorithm has grown up so fast among few years. I guess they've caught an alien or receive their technology..
Samsung is still in the days of tiny sensor and digitally processed looking images. Vivo is now in another league. It’s more going to a dslr style natural looking photos with very realistic detail rendering. 2 totally different phones here. Samsung got crushed.
Thanks for the video. I shoot a lot with my S21U, my son has the s22U. I don't see any difference in quality between the two Ultras. I also often shoot with the expert raw app and the results amaze many colleagues who then don't want to believe I did it with a "phone". I expected (feared) that the Vivo would clearly beat the S22U, but that is not the case. If Samsung can improve on the S23U, they would be ahead.
Muy interesante tu comparativa.. muy profesional... A mi ver no pocas veces el samsung logra mejores resultados y eso que tiene casi un año de haber salido. Creo que va a ser mas justa la comparativa del Vivo con el S 23 ULTRA.. que ya está al salir. ....
Vivo has done what others didn't quite achieved, deliver a quality which stands on par with Samsung. The bokeh is stronger thanks to 1" sensor. Samsung master the high dynamic range better than Vivo, but Vivo get the colour more natural. This is one of the best camera battle. THANK UOU FOR YOUR EFFORT. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Thank you very much for this usefull video, very well done :) I'm surprised because in every case I prefer the S22 ultra. Vivo X90 pro plus seems to add artificial contrast and effects to simulate more details, like video scalers, and I don't like the result. Same with Xiaomi 12S Ultra (after watching just youtube videos). S22 has more details and the result is natural. S21 ultra is also very impressive. Cheers :)
I find it funny how the photos of the S22 are intentionally altered so much that it even has a slight blur and loss of detail on the face in portrait mode. not even the S20 becomes like that. LOL
Both phones are doing great job ...but i will still go for samsung , because samsung s22ultra is about a year older than vivo but am highly waiting for s23ultra
Some of the photos were better on Vivo but the zoom and video stabilization goes to Samsung, so i guess anyone would take better zoom and better video over good photos...
Overall the Samsung is much superior, the only situation where they are balanced is in the main camera When you zoom in on photos Samsung has more detail
Daytime photography -Vivo is better, it has to be bcos it is latest phone. S22 is 1 year old phone. Front -S22 better still Night -S22 still better, difficult to believe. Vivo must improve its Night photos
In most cases, long-term capabilites and usability can be based on how the manufacturer support its software to be maximize as well as hardware/specs, S22 Ultra is a must (fyi: my option:)
Grant, can you confirm to me if the Vivo X90 Pro Plus can change launchers? to my knowledge I know that some Chinese phones don't allow for it, but I am wondering if Niagra Launcher would work on it.
There's a setting to change the default launcher, but every time you go back to the home screen it changes back to the stock launcher. Might be an ADB command to change this, but I haven't looked into that.
Except when the result is a bit blurry, I much- prefer the Vivo pictures, more-natural/more-pleasing colors. And, overall, the Vivo looks like a really cool phone for daily use.
The main camera on X90 pro+ have more detail and more look like camera output. Also the sport mode is very useful for shooting moving object. Crisp and clear
s23 ultra will have a 1/1.30 main sensor and will keep all other sensors the same, so more like, try the s25 ultra against it if you want a "fair" comparison when maybe samsung decides to use an 1 inch sensor instead of bumping fake MP to impress the average joe
@@adyady3099 wtf? sensor size is not the only thing that matters, the sensor used in the S23U is much better than the sensor used in the S22U, mainly because it contains white pixels.
@@IncelBoy much better, 1/1.33 vs 1/1.30 =)) don't fall like an idiot for fake MP marketing, sensor size does matter a lot, that's why samsung can't even use secondary cameras in low light for zoom so yeah, main camera will be good of s23 ultra won't be able to match vivo or next xiaomi. If huawei would have come with an 1 inch ryyb sensor it would have been game over for all phones in camera department.
Reserve Galaxy S23 & Galaxy Book for up to $100 credit: howl.me/ciTvzqycDlB
What's best smartphone to buy under 900 USD..
Nice video 💯
Impressive results from the X90 pro plus, just wished that it has a better front camera 😢
Vivo the best for overall. Thanks for this excellent review...
Thanks for watching
I love how X90 Pro+ can capture very bright/white object and shows its brightness without clipping. For video, I actually think Vivo is doing it better as well. Now waiting for your X90 Pro+ vs iPhone 14 Pro Max video😄
What's best smartphone to buy under 900 USD..
Awesome comparison and a VERY VERY tight battle!
I think I prefer VIvo in most cases, but they need to step up the selfie game a little.
What's best smartphone to buy under 900 USD..
Daylight, basically the same with few differences in between.
Ultrawide, day same. Zoom still goes to Vivo for detail but S22U has better ranges. Front camera day, still Samsung. Pro mode is good for adjusting Samsung's profile a bit.
Night I do prefer Samsung's for their "realism" where night is basically dark since as good as Vivo for brightening up the shot, it makes night mode redundant. It does flip between colours so each may be preferred differently. Video bright on Samsung but fuzzy and dark on Vivo but cleaner. Overall both are equally capable. It doesn't matter which to get. Makes me more excited for the S23 Ultra now.
lol samsung has better zoom range? try taking a pic at 5x or 9x, it will look unusable, not to mention in dim light it doesn't even use those sensors because that's how tiny they are.
on night again vivo destroys it, you can darken a pic anytime if you want it darker but good luck brightening up the samsung pic when it lacks tons of details.
@@adyady3099 zoom range and zoom quality are two different thing. I never said Samsung has the better quality. And yes. We brighten the photos with night mode. What'd you think that mode was made for? Astrophotography?
Basically the same? Vivo was better in basically every shot. Night mode it's not even a competition
@@joelconolly5574 why reiterate what he said? In your OP you said you prefer Samsung's night mode because it's darker. He replied stating you can always darken a picture using editing software, however you can't do the opposite (brighten) without losing detail... Are you a simpleton? Vivo is clearly superior here.
Lol sorry I've owned an S22 ultra..(sold it) Samsung wasn't even a top 5 when it came to photos before the vivo came out I now own a vivo x90 pro plus and it's not even close. It's nice taking a photo and not have to worry about shutter lag
Vivo is doing a great job! Cheers
The vivo is schockingly better than the Samsung
samsung has stopped trying in the last years especially after huawei ban because they know people will still buy so is no surprise that vivo is better, mate 50 pro is pretty much on pair with vivo, even pixel is better at camera than samsung
@@adyady3099 or... Hear me out. The Samsung is literally a year old, so this comparison is nonsensical
shockingly? barely saw any difference.
@@BLAKEEATS1988 much more detailed textured pics.
@@mrtech2259 samsung went toe to toe and x90 barely even put a fight against aging tech.
If possible try to include sunset pics in future since generally those hues are one of the toughest to reproduce.
thanks for the review, and also for taking into account the comments on the previous review!
By comparison, it is clear that Samsung is not a competitor to Vivo. The difference is too big. Samsung is still using their old algorithms from 2014 or even earlier. This results in unnatural faded colors, poor midtones, oversharpening and watercolors. Noise reduction also works very hard and eats up details. However, this approach is sometimes justified and allows, in some cases, when vivo makes a mistake with the focus, to get more interesting photos. According to the video, especially in low light, there’s nothing to even say - the Samsung can’t oppose anything.
Vivo is another level. However, its cameras also have drawbacks (the focus sometimes does not work correctly and the DR in the video is strangely set towards overexposure of bright objects, especially on night videos).
To minimize the problem with autofocus as much as possible, I resort to a trick. In the shutter settings, check the "touch" box and when taking a picture, do it not only with the shutter button, but directly tap on the place of the frame that you need in focus. In this case, the phone reexposes and refocuses the picture, and since this takes several tens of milliseconds, during this time the micro-shaking of the phone caused by tapping on the screen will already disappear and you will get a guaranteed clear picture of what you wanted.
Also, the video is too much oversharpened on vivo. It is necessary to reduce the level of sharpness on vivo in the following firmware.
Another HORRIBLE problem for video shooting is the zoom slider. This is simply unacceptable. I know a lot of people who love to shoot videos and they will never buy a phone with such a zoom! It's terribly inconvenient. you want to FAST increase to the next physical sensor, say from 0.6 to 1 and you end up aiming at that slider, move it carefully so you don't overzoom and you overszoom anyway. In this case, you lose concentration on the subject! And if you went too far, then you need to zoom back and here you can also make a mistake. Firstly, it's damn inconvenient, secondly, you get a result that is terrible and you will need to cut these moments from the video ...
Can the problem be fixed? EASY! it can be done in one update. The algorithm of the slider needs to be improved (it is desirable to do this in the same way as an iPhone zooms - this is an ideal zoom), but the MAIN thing is that in addition to the slider, you need to leave buttons for instant switching between modules. if I need to slightly increase the frame within one module, I will do it with a slider, but I would like to do the switching between modules instantly with a button. There is another reason for this. Let's say you shoot on the x2 module. want to switch to x3.5. Now for this you need to move the slider. So, up to x3.4, the x2 module will work for you and the picture will be just a crop from this sensor, and by this moment it will be just terrible quality. And then a sharp jump in quality when you switch to x3.5. Yes, x90pro plus modules are of very good quality and the jumps are almost invisible, but nevertheless they are. If you switch between modules with buttons, then this problem will simply not happen when shooting in 99% of cases (well, unless you yourself specifically do it with a slider ...)
I really don’t understand - is it really that no one shoots a video in vivo? how do they test and develop their cameras? the feeling that they are doing it exclusively for photos on the social network. And it's sad, because hardware this phone is PERFECT. however, the software does not always correspond to it ...
I beg you to make a video and preferably with a clickbait title and show on it how terribly inconvenient it is to use zoom in a Vivo camera and show how convenient it is to use zoom on an iPhone or Samsung.
The quality of the shooting is important, but it is equally important to have the convenience of doing so.
Interestingly, Vivo has one of the best and most understandable interfaces for the camera, but I don’t understand how they could screw up the zoom slider like that ...
I like vivo, but some pictures are blurry. 2:31 - 2:40 vivo clearly missed focus. Improvement needed.
Just received the Vivo about 10 days ago and its camera system (with image and vdo processing) is amazing. I can only directly compare with the Samsungs S21 Ultra and the Huawei Mate 30 Pro that I own but this is quite a big step up from their level to the Vivo X90 Pro Plus... also considering all the other aspects of a smart phone (performance, battery, charging time, etc, etc...)...
is it a worth upgrade?
from galaxy s21 ultra?
What's best smartphone to buy under 900 USD..
How to order phone?
Your camera comparisons are one of the best if not the best out there! I'm so amazed by the cinematic video mode of the Vivo, because it looks so natural. On the Pixel 7 Pro it looks ridiculously unnatural and on the Galaxy SEE Ultra it also looks a bit unnatural! Have to do some videos in the cinematic mode with my X90 Pro+ soon
Thanks, I appreciate that. Hope you enjoy your X90 Pro+ too!
@@GrantLikesTech Thanks, I'm pretty sure I will!
@@GrantLikesTech Can you tell which phone has the best video zoom in the night?
What's best smartphone to buy under 900 USD..
Another great video comparison, thank you for you hard work!!! Interesting to see how Vivo's strategy of more megapixels vs optical zoom on the S22 stacks up. The 10x zoom used to be the main advantage of the S22 which no other phone could touch. Vivo managed to get close to the point of the difference being negligible - check 4:30. The Samsung cameras might seem sharper generally, but this is just down to processing - in my eyes they are oversharpened. I much prefer the Vivo balance and to do my own sharpening if needed. So excited for this phone's global release!!!!
Unfortunately there won't be a global release! Only the X90 and X90 Pro will be globally available at least in the beginning. Hopefully they change their mind later on
@@flo_h_96 just read the news. Absolute insanity if it's not released globally. We care about the Vivo because of the cameras, so no way sales of the lesser camera phones are going to be high. They do hint a telescope lens in the release campaign though. Only the pro+ has that
@@winther5 I agree! They should bring the Pro+! The Pro does have a telephoto lens, maybe they mean that
@@flo_h_96 I really wonder what is Vivo's rationale. Anyway, if there is no global release, I will import from China. Seems there is no issue with the 4g/5g bands and Origin OS seems better than Funtouch. Apart from lack of warranty, I see no downsides
@@winther5 yes, would be interesting to hear why they are not releasing it globally.
I imported it from china! It supports all 4G/5G bands so there is no issue. Origin OS is definitely better than Funtouch OS, but I underestimate how much work it was to get rid of most of the chinese bloatware and get all the settings right. If you want to get rid of everything chinese it's even more work. But it also depends if you have already done the set up process of such a phone and know what to do or if you do it the first time like me! But if everything is done it's definitely worth it. The phone is amazing and at the same time quite cheap compared to most of the flagship phones from other brands
Funny how the Vivo is better at 10x Zoom than the S22 but worse than the S22 at 20x
Are watching on a phone
@@mit6089 No i am watching on a 2k 34inch widescreen monitor, if that is your question
The 10x on s22 ultra is miles better than the vivo though...the vivo just produced a digitally processed 10x video wheras the Samsung has an optical one....
The vivo does good but it's too oversharpened n it looks digitally processed which it is
@@mfg-music5875 hmm you must be watching in 144p then cuz the 10x on samsung was way better
@@akagetobimaru1994 so you wanna tell me the 10x shot at 4:00 from samsung is better? WTF also the shot 10x shot at 4:09 if he didnt shake looks much more natural on the vivo. 20x therefore samsung uses its software and than wins again, but 10x shots from samsung are just bad for a dedicated 10x telephoto
For the video yeah there you can see the digitaly processing of the vivo here samsung cleary wins at 10x
Great video! Eagerly waiting for the comparison with iPhone now.
I have both phones, it's not even close. Vivo takes the best overall photos right now..
As a Samsung fan it's hard but I have to admit that the Vivo is better, especially in night photo-video 😔
You can see clearly and especially at night that the Vivo has a much better hardware, and also the software aspect is really on the level 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
On the other hand, the Vivo is strangely bad in night selfie 🤔
Samsung really has a serious competitor there to its upcoming S23 Ultra, and I hope they can rise to the challenge 🤞🏽, even though I'm not a fan of all those 108 and 200mpx sensors and don't believe in their usefulness.
Vivo is the winner but its audio sound is so bad. What happened to microphone? Hope Vivo does something to mic for better sound.
Thank you for showing Pro Mode. I shoot exclusively in Pro and get AMAZING results without Samsung's processing.
I think you're using exynos version of s22 ultra. Because mostly Samsung pictures are vibrant and contract.
Snapdragon, I'm in the US and that's what we get here.
Well well, vivo is shockingly better than what I consider a pretty good camera phone😮😮. The. VIVO should be facing the iPhone and Pixel. Really surprised 😯
In addition, can you provide information about the POSITION SOFTWARE version used? And what is the software, the final software? because the software update determines the camera results
I remember that i have been watching your channel since was 10k subscribers. Always thanks for your effort, it really helps tech fans make right choice. Especially guys who are in south korea, (like me) cannot directly look or touch various phones except 🍎 or samsung. Hope you keep safe, and HPNY
Ps. It's so weird vivo's hdr algorithm has grown up so fast among few years. I guess they've caught an alien or receive their technology..
Thanks, I appreciate the support and glad you find these videos helpful!
Samsung is still in the days of tiny sensor and digitally processed looking images. Vivo is now in another league. It’s more going to a dslr style natural looking photos with very realistic detail rendering. 2 totally different phones here. Samsung got crushed.
You are 100% correct!!
Thanks for the video. I shoot a lot with my S21U, my son has the s22U. I don't see any difference in quality between the two Ultras. I also often shoot with the expert raw app and the results amaze many colleagues who then don't want to believe I did it with a "phone". I expected (feared) that the Vivo would clearly beat the S22U, but that is not the case. If Samsung can improve on the S23U, they would be ahead.
Thanks, great video,, love from india
Muy interesante tu comparativa.. muy profesional... A mi ver no pocas veces el samsung logra mejores resultados y eso que tiene casi un año de haber salido. Creo que va a ser mas justa la comparativa del Vivo con el S 23 ULTRA.. que ya está al salir. ....
S22 series the king off camera android ..
Last galaxy s23 series .. best smartphone 2023
Nice work, thx!! - in very short: which has got better battery life??? vivo 80 pro lost against S22 ultra ...
Vivo really is amazing camera-wise. Samsung just can't compete unfortunately (I'm a Samsung user.) Amazing video as always!!
Thanks for watching as always
Vivo X90 Pro+ vs Pixel 7 Pro: ruclips.net/video/PHhFWuBlnfs/видео.html
S22 ultra nella modalità pro, quali parametri hai impostato? Grazie
This is what I'm waiting for
Thank for the awesome video 👍
Thanks for watching!
Vivo has done what others didn't quite achieved, deliver a quality which stands on par with Samsung. The bokeh is stronger thanks to 1" sensor. Samsung master the high dynamic range better than Vivo, but Vivo get the colour more natural.
This is one of the best camera battle. THANK UOU FOR YOUR EFFORT. 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Can you do a camera test to samsung z fold 4 vs samsung s22 ultra
So which one is good,I have plans to buy a phone
*Top*
Vivo x90pro+ is much better from s22ultra
Looks like strengths and weaknesses for both in individual areas but the x90 seems sharper in most scenarios.
At least when focusing on a person.
Thank you very much for this usefull video, very well done :) I'm surprised because in every case I prefer the S22 ultra. Vivo X90 pro plus seems to add artificial contrast and effects to simulate more details, like video scalers, and I don't like the result. Same with Xiaomi 12S Ultra (after watching just youtube videos). S22 has more details and the result is natural. S21 ultra is also very impressive. Cheers :)
What's best smartphone to buy under 900 USD..
I find it funny how the photos of the S22 are intentionally altered so much that it even has a slight blur and loss of detail on the face in portrait mode. not even the S20 becomes like that. LOL
There are blurred vivo x90 photos because minimum distance focus it is not fulfilled
Thanks bro....
Super bro 👌
Thank you so much
The vivo looks almost cinematic like, the samsung looks Great too, but the vivo has way More Detail in normal shots
Which 1 is better in front facing video recording audio quality ????
Watch and see for yourself. I'd go Samsung given the 4k recording option.
Why s22U so soft, no facial detail at all 🤣 0:16. Beautification at high level
wtf are you talking about? there is no beauty filter, is just a tiny sensor not keeping up with an 1 inch sensor, loosing details in low light
Both phones are doing great job ...but i will still go for samsung , because samsung s22ultra is about a year older than vivo but am highly waiting for s23ultra
Please compare Vivi X90 pro+ with pixel 7 pro
Already done: ruclips.net/video/PHhFWuBlnfs/видео.html
Some of the photos were better on Vivo but the zoom and video stabilization goes to Samsung, so i guess anyone would take better zoom and better video over good photos...
A Perfect Comparison, A Perfect Video💯
Glad you liked it
Thanks
Thank you! Really appreciate it.
Well looks like we got new Android King here 😊 thanks for comparison
Thank you. Great phone Vivo
Overall the Samsung is much superior, the only situation where they are balanced is in the main camera
When you zoom in on photos Samsung has more detail
Daytime photography -Vivo is better, it has to be bcos it is latest phone. S22 is 1 year old phone.
Front -S22 better still
Night -S22 still better, difficult to believe.
Vivo must improve its Night photos
X90 pro plus full review please..!
I expected vivoto perform better than it did..Perhaps it is not optimized yet..Its cameras should improve after a number of software updates..
I own one and trust me it's a lot more impressive than what you see here
很詳細的測試，可參考性比DXO好
Vivo was doing such a great job..
In most cases, long-term capabilites and usability can be based on how the manufacturer support its software to be maximize as well as hardware/specs, S22 Ultra is a must (fyi: my option:)
i will wait for S23 Ultra for better competetion..
hey can you compare s20+ vs a72?
Grant, can you confirm to me if the Vivo X90 Pro Plus can change launchers? to my knowledge I know that some Chinese phones don't allow for it, but I am wondering if Niagra Launcher would work on it.
There's a setting to change the default launcher, but every time you go back to the home screen it changes back to the stock launcher. Might be an ADB command to change this, but I haven't looked into that.
I would agree that the Vivo photos were more color accurate, but I thought Samsung looked way better on video.
Samsung looks like the oversharpen king from this video
Except when the result is a bit blurry, I much- prefer the Vivo pictures, more-natural/more-pleasing colors. And, overall, the Vivo looks like a really cool phone for daily use.
Is the Samsung Exynos or Snapdragon?
Snapdragon
Nice comparison
Thanks
Also compare vivo x90pro+ with s23 ultra
Already done 😉
ruclips.net/video/Ty0ttb9jK0c/видео.html
Bro, where to order vivo x90 pro plus outside of china? Pls help i wanna buy it so much.
I buy from Wonda Mobile or Giztop
To be honest, Samsung oversharpen the image. Colour production better in Vivo.
😘😘😊😊
X90pro plus wins almost everywhere
The ducks clearly preferred being photographed by Vivo.
Both phones are doing great job ...but i will still go for samsung
X90 pro plus vs 14 pro Max camera
Best phone in the world 🌹🌹🌹🌹
Brazil!
I thought your hoodie is black ? So what's the real color of thatl
Heather (dark) gray
@@GrantLikesTech so ... Seems like vivo selfie cam didn't get color accuracy
dayumm 1inch sensor is real deal.
i loves my ExpertRaw on my Note20Ultra
Wait for s23 ultra when specs are comparable 😉
I have both device on hand, honetly X90 Pro+is better than S22 ultra except selfie and 10x zoom(sometime X90 pro+ have more detail at 10x).
The main camera on X90 pro+ have more detail and more look like camera output. Also the sport mode is very useful for shooting moving object. Crisp and clear
Vivo x90 pro plus 💪🔥🔥
Vivo is soo good
Zeiss optics 💪
You already know
Overall, I will go for Samsung.
Price me bhi difference hai ek 130000 ka vivo 80000 ka ayega
My phon is vivo x90 pro plus
Vivo x90 pro + king
vivo is the winner
Vivo was great
The Samsung has the beauty filter on 😅 thats why all your photos look like that
No filters or smoothing. That's just the age processing.
Vivo killer 😁
So beautiful video sir. 🤗
Thanks a lot
Vivo top
Je préfère le Vivo sur tout sauf sur la couleur blanche sur les photos.
Why is the s22 ultra so blurry in some pics and videos. What firmware is on the s22 ultra?
Android 13, One UI 5 December update which was the latest as of the video. Minimum focusing distance isn't the best like most larger camera sensors.
👍👍
Samsung will continue to be left behind next several years until they get bigger sensors and better shutter speed
Differences are obvious . The S23 Ultra has to be put against x90 pro plus . S22 cant compete .and its normal , 9 months between them .
s23 ultra will have a 1/1.30 main sensor and will keep all other sensors the same, so more like, try the s25 ultra against it if you want a "fair" comparison when maybe samsung decides to use an 1 inch sensor instead of bumping fake MP to impress the average joe
@@adyady3099 wtf? sensor size is not the only thing that matters, the sensor used in the S23U is much better than the sensor used in the S22U, mainly because it contains white pixels.
@@IncelBoy much better, 1/1.33 vs 1/1.30 =)) don't fall like an idiot for fake MP marketing, sensor size does matter a lot, that's why samsung can't even use secondary cameras in low light for zoom so yeah, main camera will be good of s23 ultra won't be able to match vivo or next xiaomi.
If huawei would have come with an 1 inch ryyb sensor it would have been game over for all phones in camera department.