it's a pretty well established fact that social-economic status of one's family has a direct impact on education. What is the originality of this kind of research besides reinforcing what we already know? The real question should be -- what can the government do to improve social mobility, especially considering Gaokao favors big city kids and rich families?
Jesus. That is why you should scrap Gaokao and do some pure psychometric test that tests the genetic potential of the children. Then give the children their childhood back. How much do people really retain of all their studying efforts....
There is no "genetic potential". That is what this woman is talking about. Rich children perform better because their childhoods are filled with many opportunities for them to learn about the world and acquire all sorts of skills passively : travelling the world, experiencing different cultures, or simply being able to discuss with their parents every day about specialised topics (many poor children's parents are too busy with work to do that).
没有什么新鲜事，这种研究是浪费时间和资源。 父母的社会经济背景对孩子的教育和成就具有积极和决定性的影响。 这个事实已被一次又一次地证明。 北京、上海这样的中国一线城市是中国精英的聚集地，而这些精英的子弟往往在生活的各方面都是为国际竞争做好充分的准备，这不是什么新鲜事。 中国人社会无论走到哪里，永远是一个痴迷于阶级区别的社会。
你最后一句话是经典。
同意，只要是想要学习的青少年都值得更好的资源。王侯将相宁有种乎，古人都知道的道理！
it's a pretty well established fact that social-economic status of one's family has a direct impact on education. What is the originality of this kind of research besides reinforcing what we already know? The real question should be -- what can the government do to improve social mobility, especially considering Gaokao favors big city kids and rich families?
台大做過統計研究
大多數的學生都來自都市地區
且家庭經濟良好
而他們讀台大
也是享有最多教育補助或其他資源的學生群
精英家庭除了多学霸，更是三观的养成。学习是人生中最简单的事，穷到都上不起学的单说。
what is true happiness? who is really a winner? who I am, where I was from, where should I go, it is enough to think and learn...
exactly.....
還以為這些因果關係早已被主流接受。。說真的，有必要七年追蹤嗎？比較想看量化出來的大數據
精英都以为自己是努力得来的
性格决定命运，眼界决定人生。
不同地方的人的文化核心，東亞/美國覺得決定人生的是能力與努力，歐洲人生是運氣決定論，所以東亞/美國崇金字塔，歐洲崇橄欖
没有解决方案和建议就是在贩卖焦虑
本身就没办法也不能解决
Many rich families have the $ and connections resources to help their kids… while many rich kids don’t really have to perform up to standard
Learned so much from this VDO.
记得以前一个有“特长”的大学同学跟我说：“本事要给自己孩子多留点”.
没有明白要表达什么….
他要表達的是:要成功不是只靠努力就可以達成的，投胎對胎比努力重要太多了。
家裡窮沒錢上大學的，連變成學霸的機會都沒有
Simple,因为他一早算好了不会有个亏钱的老公
前6%在别的地方可能上个一本都很难，说1%是学霸可能都很让别的省份的人瞧不起
你好，大家好！有办法拿到这个研究报告的链接吗？
有趣
有錢讀書，沒錢工作。
用錢砸加上父母兩方的基因😂
教育的不平等的受益者，不过的我想问你，除了吹嘘你的价值不平等，你还有什么要跟们说的吗？
Jesus. That is why you should scrap Gaokao and do some pure psychometric test that tests the genetic potential of the children. Then give the children their childhood back. How much do people really retain of all their studying efforts....
There is no "genetic potential". That is what this woman is talking about. Rich children perform better because their childhoods are filled with many opportunities for them to learn about the world and acquire all sorts of skills passively : travelling the world, experiencing different cultures, or simply being able to discuss with their parents every day about specialised topics (many poor children's parents are too busy with work to do that).
走出舒適圈是錯的。 超差的這-篇。
天生一副好牌 除非这副牌是党内挂钩的吧 否则即使有钱也不一定就能培养到听话听教认真学习的小孩 更大记录取决孩子自己的认知 早认清社会 能接受现实 还是比较有钱重要 我们应该不要用是不是学霸去判断 孩子能比父母生活得更好 已经满足了
说话文邹邹的，一股子书呆子气的一次采访
还是某些地方氛围好，不卷学历，不是善于死学习的人出众，而是有商业头脑的，没学历，没背景却能打拼创业的人
這有什麼好研究的，菁英家庭比較重視教育而已
不單只是比較重視教育而已，還包刮文化資本、人脈資源，所以大陸才會說大學一畢業就會被打回原來的階級。
这个人肚子没货