Actually the baby was shown the rat a bunch of times and liked it and then after some time the loud noise was introduced whenever the baby would reach for the rat. He was conditioned to fear the rat by the use of the loud noise. Not the other way around.
Thank you Mary. This was really helpful. I am studying a BSc Hons Degree in Health Sciences with the Open University. Sometimes the OU text can be a little confusing and I need to go 'elsewhere' to get a simple explanation in plain English! This has been excellent and I have posted it to my forum so that other students can also view your presentation. May I ask if there is anyway to save/copy the slides for future reference or is that against copyright?
This lesson is all wrong!! Why are you teaching wrong teaching. Pavlov paired the food with a bell. The bell is the neutral Stimulus!! When the dog heard the bell it started to salivate for the bell. So Pavlov conditioned the dog to salivate to the sound of the bell. This is the right explanation.
Hii. Thank you for making me aware with such thing. I don't think that all her explanation is wrong. The only information that wasn't correct is when she said the conditioned stimulus is the dish of the dog. It is a bell as you said
@@user-sz4ik8ch6l It becomes a conditioned stimulus when paired with the meat powder which then elicits a conditioned response ( salivating) but prior to that the bell itself is a neutral stimulus as it has no effect on the dog without it being paired with the meat powder. The bell elicits no response unless the dog is conditioned to pair it with the meat powder. I hope this helps. 🤗
Actually the baby was shown the rat a bunch of times and liked it and then after some time the loud noise was introduced whenever the baby would reach for the rat. He was conditioned to fear the rat by the use of the loud noise. Not the other way around.
This makes sense alot thanks
so easy to understand . Thanks alot.
you don't know how much you are helping thanks a lot that z incredible. continue being considerate.
Thank you Mary. This was really helpful. I am studying a BSc Hons Degree in Health Sciences with the Open University. Sometimes the OU text can be a little confusing and I need to go 'elsewhere' to get a simple explanation in plain English! This has been excellent and I have posted it to my forum so that other students can also view your presentation. May I ask if there is anyway to save/copy the slides for future reference or is that against copyright?
thanks for your clear and slow explanation.
very helpful for. B.ed students :) thank you
Saved me a lot of reading.
You teach very well.
Im in psychology 150 and this helped so much. Thanks. Im understanding it better each day.
Thank you so much you have no idea how much this is helped me ! definitely going to be look at your other videos
Thank you mam for sharing. This helps me a lot. 😊
0:07 classical condishing lol
So they are “prompting” us or conditioning us that we are going to learn about Classical Conditioning. Great service ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
excellent job!
Thanks this was very helpful.
Easy to understand
i love your lessons, iam studying Psychology
Excellent 😮
Wow..very clear explanation
Helped me for psych ty!
Wow... Nice tutor
wow good lecture
good to get on....
Good explanation very nice
This lesson is all wrong!! Why are you teaching wrong teaching. Pavlov paired the food with a bell. The bell is the neutral Stimulus!! When the dog heard the bell it started to salivate for the bell. So Pavlov conditioned the dog to salivate to the sound of the bell. This is the right explanation.
Hii. Thank you for making me aware with such thing. I don't think that all her explanation is wrong. The only information that wasn't correct is when she said the conditioned stimulus is the dish of the dog. It is a bell as you said
Thanks for clarifying bcz I thought I ddnt understand
That's what I was wondering about. It's a bell, not a dish!!!
So they gave a child a phobia 💀
Right?! How awful. Psych has come a long way since then with ethical treatment standards. Can't believe that has to be corrected.
Thanks alot🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
Thanks. Can i have the slides???
fantastic explanation
cool thank u
New subscriber ❤️
ur a saint thank u mary
Thank u so much this is so helpful 💕
thank you
Good
I though it was a white bunny
not exposing scamdemic
"classic conditioning"
Your childrens children future are in your hands at this precise moment in time
I'm pretty sure Pavlov used a bell as the neutral stimulus. Thanks for the video
The bell Is the conditional stimulus
@@user-sz4ik8ch6l It becomes a conditioned stimulus when paired with the meat powder which then elicits a conditioned response ( salivating) but prior to that the bell itself is a neutral stimulus as it has no effect on the dog without it being paired with the meat powder.
The bell elicits no response unless the dog is conditioned to pair it with the meat powder. I hope this helps. 🤗
@@zilke6605 thank you for clearing. Now I understand better...have a great day
Very helpful. Thank you. But in the last image of Little Albert shouldn't he be crying, as opposed to smiling at the rat?
Well explained. This also explains the generalized disorder like generalized anxiety disorder.
This helps me a lot for my psych class 🙏
poor little Albert
Thanks alot Mary
Keep going sister👍🏾👍👍👍👍👍
very easy to understand, great work
Thank you this is helping me
❤
I still didn't get it. It's probably an unconditioned stimulus.
Thanks Mam
am inlove with this channel 😍😍💪💪 from Zambia🇿🇲🇿🇲🇿🇲🇿🇲
This is great,better than my 2hrs class
Excellent explanationnn
Thank you 1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣%
well explained
I one pavlov
thank you mam