To be honest, the concept (or definition) about that "no diffusion control is the capacitive behaviour" is not right, because as far as we know, even for the pure EDLCs, the capacitance still diffusion controlled, especially for the sub-nanometer electrodes.
![[Perspective] Si anode and SEI reactivity for Si-containing battery](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lKV5x38R5PE/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Perspective] Si anode and SEI reactivity for Si-containing battery](/img/tr.png)
![[Research Paper]Influence of Finite Diffusion on Cation Insertion-Coupled Electron Transfer Kinetics](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C31BD36PyKc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Research Paper] In situ Monitoring Redox Processes in Energy Storage Using UV-Vis Spectroscopy](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vnkvxlamOdc/mqdefault.jpg)
![[Perspective] MXenes as building blocks for future materials and devices](/img/1.gif)
impressive work, thanks for sharing this
It is always helpful to specify the nature of the working electrode when examining the solvent's potential window.
Good work. Kindly do include how morphology changes of MXenes effect energy storage applications.
To be honest, the concept (or definition) about that "no diffusion control is the capacitive behaviour" is not right, because as far as we know, even for the pure EDLCs, the capacitance still diffusion controlled, especially for the sub-nanometer electrodes.