Isnt the calculation of continous compounding inverted? We should find the continuously compounded rate from the annual rate rate use e^x and to find the annual rate from the continuously compounded rate use LN? I tested here using a large number in the compounding period (999999) to mimic the continuously compounded and the result is the same.
Its to do with brackets and Order of operations. I found that adding brackets like the formula looks like fixes the issue. Or as previous user suggested pressing equals does the same.
Omg the AOS mode is a life saver!
How to enable it I didn't get it
At 14:47 you forgot to mention to put parentheses (3.54/2.21) y^{x} 4 1/x. Otherwise, in AOS mode it calculates it incorrectly.
if you hit = before you hit y^x, you can skip parentheses
Thank you very much sir!!!!
Great review!
Isnt the calculation of continous compounding inverted?
We should find the continuously compounded rate from the annual rate rate use e^x and to find the annual rate from the continuously compounded rate use LN?
I tested here using a large number in the compounding period (999999) to mimic the continuously compounded and the result is the same.
When I am setting 6 N, 7 I/Y, 60 PMT, 1000 FV, CPT PV I am getting 946.6973. Why am I off?
Oops... 0.13 0.1.. i can do this..
That was so funny yet cute XD
14:40 I'm getting 1.9 when I follow what he says??
after 2.21 = then yx
Same as here, have you found a reason for it?
Its to do with brackets and Order of operations. I found that adding brackets like the formula looks like fixes the issue. Or as previous user suggested pressing equals does the same.
(3.54 ÷ 2.21) y^x 4 1/x=1.125 -1
Use this video to set order of operations. ruclips.net/video/OWajtj8ewn0/видео.html