1) Overall confused with the direction of the case : it originally stated that through pilot testing, the cost-saving impacts of each tools were proven. Our goal was to think about how to scale these AI tools up extensively, throughout all flights. While the framework concentrated on that exact goal, the first step requested to calculate the efficiency of the first tool! and it takes up almost half of the whole interview. If the goal was to examine how much cost it would save, isn't the first case question quite misleading? 2) I don't quite understand the costs mentioned in terms of flight delay: if flight was delayed because it departed on time but arrived late- yes, there would be cost for fuel and maybe airport fees. But if the flight just departed late, there would be just airport fees and no extra fuel costs. I did think it was an interesting case, and I had a lot to learn from it. I wish to learn more about how interview cases are directioned through my questions here:) Always open for feedback or ideas from anyone:) I would be happy to be let known if I'm mistaken.
I love the answers, but it’s so obvious that the interviewee already has all the answers ready. If this case is given in real life, an average person will need 45 minutes to answer all questions fully
Curious if the interviewee knew the question before the mock interview. Their answer about delay-related costs was almost word-for-word the same as the response I got from Claude AI when I copied and pasted Abby's question to Claude AI. 😵
from what I understand lot of these interviewees have the case beforehand. If you look at the other interviews, it becomes pretty obvious with the questions, answers and other ideas that are quite literally word to word with the case
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
1) Overall confused with the direction of the case : it originally stated that through pilot testing, the cost-saving impacts of each tools were proven. Our goal was to think about how to scale these AI tools up extensively, throughout all flights.
While the framework concentrated on that exact goal, the first step requested to calculate the efficiency of the first tool! and it takes up almost half of the whole interview. If the goal was to examine how much cost it would save, isn't the first case question quite misleading?
2) I don't quite understand the costs mentioned in terms of flight delay: if flight was delayed because it departed on time but arrived late- yes, there would be cost for fuel and maybe airport fees. But if the flight just departed late, there would be just airport fees and no extra fuel costs.
I did think it was an interesting case, and I had a lot to learn from it. I wish to learn more about how interview cases are directioned through my questions here:) Always open for feedback or ideas from anyone:) I would be happy to be let known if I'm mistaken.
I love the answers, but it’s so obvious that the interviewee already has all the answers ready. If this case is given in real life, an average person will need 45 minutes to answer all questions fully
damn.. the interviewer dumping info at lightning speed.. so hard to capture all this info while practicing along
yeah no way she's doing all that math that fast
Curious if the interviewee knew the question before the mock interview. Their answer about delay-related costs was almost word-for-word the same as the response I got from Claude AI when I copied and pasted Abby's question to Claude AI. 😵
from what I understand lot of these interviewees have the case beforehand. If you look at the other interviews, it becomes pretty obvious with the questions, answers and other ideas that are quite literally word to word with the case
@@adityanarayan04 you just burst my bubble