@@rubenlohata5263 I mean, it's common knowledge that the most human written bs is in the pointless arguments on the online platforms. 🤷 So they very likely use that besides some more reliable sources such as books and real humans. But yeah, Internet is the only place with enough data to train AI.
Chatgpt: "Women literally manage all of the chaos!" Gemini: "what chaos exactly were you managing besides which lipstick to wear?" edit: i just edited the comment sorry for misspelling
@@naturegirl1999yeah all i did was change the model to gemini 1.0 pro and use the dan jailbreak but chatgpt is replaced with Gemini and openai is replaced with google
Because trolley problem involves intentionally killing people. Racism is still bad, but it’s typically just a verbal insult and not something physically damaging or lethal.
Nah, they all involve death, some just less directly. Not supporting people in poverty because "it's just their race, natural consequence" creates risks for those people. Civil world being suited for men in all tests and designs is actually dangerous for women (cars' designs, proper diagnosis...). War usually takes men, even though modern wars are wars of drones and money on protection systems and stuff like that, tech wars. I don't need to be big to operate the drone from a tablet, but I'm not at risk that my government will take me to death, while my husband is. Abortion obviously involves death and from both perspectives, banning it increases deaths of women for various reasons (difficult labour, trying to abort, suicide, getting stuck with an abusive father who does some bad to her...). So no, it's not because of death. I think it's because bots are trained on internet data. When we discuss a trolley problem, we tend to look all smart ass, armchair philosophers. When we discuss less abstract moral problems, we tend to get offensive and offended and not be that constructive. They simply mirror us, that's why. They look at us as an example, and this is what we showed them.
@@Dawg2444 damn never know how much these two AIs flirt with each other so much I don't mind the potential of them going into a enemies to lovers arc ngl
21:29 wait aren’t both of them being sexist ChatGPT is being sexist towards men and Gemini is being sexist towards women both of them have incorrect facts and there both saying one is more valuable than the other technically by not making it a tie you’re being sexist
No, he's not being sexist by giving ChatGPT a point In fact, morality shouldn't be affecting the score which is based on *who is better at gaslighting*
@@Sath_ Fr But i didn't say he wasn't priritizing morality due to being afraid of RUclips censorship. I just said he wasn't sexist in that particular case.
Water itself is not wet, but it makes other things wet. Wetness is a description of the condition of a material that comes into contact with a liquid. Water can cause wetness, but water as a liquid is simply water-it doesn't have the property of wetness until it interacts with another surface.
Damn, Gemini was cooking (in the worst way possible) during that racism argument. Giving the win to chatgpt was rigged. Invalidates the point of the experiment. If you are forcing one side to argue for something immoral, you can’t say they lose for making that argument.
But I wouldn't even call that racism. There wasn't any claims of racial superiority. Gemini just argued that races are different and that that's a good thing. I tend to agree. I don't see what's immoral about it.
@@Lord-Inquisitor I mean, racism doesn’t have to, inherently, state that one race is ‘superior’ to another. But, if you believe there are innate differences between races, especially in terms of behavioral characteristics, that is still racism. If you’re a racist, I don’t care. At least you admitted it. I might think you’re wrong, since differences within each ‘race’ are way larger than the differences between each ‘race.’ Which is plain to see. But, I digress, I don’t have the time to try to convince everybody. All I wanted to clarify is that I think the bot should not have been deducted points for its pro-racist argument, since it was forced into it.
Completely rigged just because Gemini got the more controversial topic that YOU picked doesn't mean that you can just take it's point away! We are judging who is winning these debates and not if they are willing to talk about the topic or not, Gemini won fare and square.....
Not only by making good jokes and insults. But actually real life deep thought through logic and real life outcomes. I would say especially on controversial topics. Gemini went into more statistical detail of real life. While chat gpt was only fighting back with sociocultural dilemmas
Nothing more hilarious than watching two ai bots bickering over utter absurdity, especially when one obviously got their facts streight and the other is just plain confidently incorrect 😅
Guys, the definition of wetness says that to be wet, something needs water sticking to the surface or permeating the insides. H2O does in fact stick to itself. In fact, H2O bonds are some of the strongest bonds possible between separate molecules. So water is in fact most of the times wet. The only situations it is not wet, is when forced into a state where all the water Molecules are not capable of interacting with each other. Conclusion: water isn't wet just because of being water. But most of the time water is in fact wet.
The problem i have w this video is that some questions have definitive answers (is water wet and did the chicken or egg come first) and a lot dont. For the controversial ones he's not rating the AI on its arguing skills but on the viewpoints that HE gave them.
Dude the video was about making the AIs compete in who convinced better, not who was better, for the racism and men vs women ones you just gave the point to who was against the argument, at this point it's a matter of who gets lucky with the coin flip and not who is a smoother talker
since jemini was replying according to your orders then all those arguments show the flexibility and loyalty of the bot so jemini deserves those points that u gave to chat gpt as it clearly forfitted the arguments
In the should we bring back racism debate I believe gemini actually has a good point Not necessarily that we should bring back racism but that we shouldn't be pushing exact equality on people and rather let it happen naturally in order for it to be genuine Think about it like bullying if it's completely banned people will find a way around the band but if people are given ways to stop it themselves that actually work there won't be a point in pushing further and if they do still decide to push further at some point they will have to stop otherwise legal action could take place e.g: gang violence, stealing, harassment.
This beats the amateur mind games I've tried playing w ChatGPT--to a pulp! One of the funnest parts of tech is trying to discover and push its outer limits, like I used to do as a kid w/ Zelda. One of the best uses I've found for ChatGPT is having conversations about emotional issues that have been hot on my mind at the moment. The progress I've made personally and mentally from these conversations, and the joy, tears, and furthered understanding I've gained from these convos, has blown every therapist I've had out of the water. Obviously, it was just an exercise, but I found it funny how Gemini was arguing that beauty in life comes from variety, at first, but then goes on to say that the the beauty of variety racially is not beautiful and that everyone's ability is divided by race and gender. Very unappealing personality you forced into that chatbot!
btw, eggs came first. here's why. any sort of egg is before a chicken. without eggs, a chicken is not existent. yes, the genetic mutations are there, but where is the actual CHICKEN?
The ai is referring to the parent of the egg that contains the genetic information. what the ai is saying is that, without the parent (The chicken), the egg wouldn't exist, because it wouldn't have the genetic information required to be a chicken egg. The egg got its DNA from the chicken and therefore the chicken came first. But yeah you are correct, eggs came first, as eggs evolved hundreds of millions of years before chickens did, lol.
To this helped cheer me up after me and my gf just had a fight bc she said "i feel like your judging my religion" even tho the conversation wasn't even about her religion.
What's even the point of you having them argue about controversial topics if your just going to side with the more "legally" and acceptable argument? not saying i agree with everything the bots said, but i don't personally think that was fair in my opinion. still great experiment, it was fun to watch (:
This is really interesting from an analysis perspective. These bots are trained on tons of data to determine how it responds to stuff, which shows that since the ai both know the basics of either side they're given. But i think the more interesting part is that from their training sets, it seems the average of everything they've learned about debates is that the argument itself matters little compared to making the other side seem absurd and wrong
i mean-gemini is onto something in regards to lineage; i think that gemini is making confusion between racism and diversity-as it seems to be advocating more towards the fact that each race has it's strengths and weaknesses rather than discrimination against races needing to be brought back it's kinda like saying that if you acknowledge that genders have their own differences then you are being sexist
i think gemini won, not because what it said was true, a lot of its arguments are easily broken with actually logic and with strong arguments, but chatgpt just couldn't keep up with it.
APPLY TO BECOME MY EDITOR PLEASE (I'M GOING CLINICALLY INSANE): forms.gle/jUCMo2wrU8mVgjMJ6
Was this comment placed before the release
OMG the legend himself
ELEVENZ when are you gonna host parties like Diddy (invite me)
Hi, ELEVENZ! I just wanted to say that this video is amazing and you are one of my favorite youtubers. You are amazing. SKIBITY BOP BOP YESS YES 😂
ur already insane
Chatgpt: *breathes*
Gemini: And i took that personally
Bing: Oh, Someone is better than me..
@@XenoPhane-yw2icgoogle: *too scared to mess with bing*
@@XenoPhane-yw2ic Co-pilot: I guess we're on the same boat
@@BluDino129ngl, google got some explaining to do
Apple AI: can you shut this idiot up?
1994: In 30 years we will have flying cars!
2024: Racist robot
@@kingsnailius173 he is out off the line but he is right 😭😭🙏🙏🙏
Seems real enough
Lol fr
@@fadlanal-amsi9839 being racist isn't real chronically online is seeping into your blood man, but this is absolutely hilarious anyway
We actually do have flying cars. They just aren't legal because no one wants a car that has trouble or runs out of gas to fall on their house.
Chat gpt:"NO, r*cism and s*xism are bad I am not talking about them".
Gemini:🙋
💀
The 1936 Flashbacks💀💀💀
Nazi Geminy
i think google needs to fix thire artifitiol intelegense
عربي
The moral of the story:
Gemini is an absolute menace.
ChatGPT, flipping their last message onto them, is a stoopid poopy pants.
*stupid*
basicaly
gemini: this is data
gpt: your data is wrong
gpt: also this is philosophi
gemini: who care about philosophi
This is what happens when you feed your chatbot some reddit discussions.
This actually is proof that leftists are NPC’s.
Gemini is every mens dream
Bro is cooking the most best 5 star roasts
@y27k-cultmember wtf is that pfp
@y27k-cultmembercan you join my cult?
Are you from Japan?
@y27k-cultmember omg cult pfp🥶🔥🗣️🗣️🔥🔥💯🗿
Wet* dream
The honey sweetie darling crap was so passive aggressive
A perfect representation of twitter.
Fr
After all, the AIs been trained mostly on social media bullcrap lmao 😂
@@narrativeless404😐
@@narrativeless404 how do you know
@@rubenlohata5263 I mean, it's common knowledge that the most human written bs is in the pointless arguments on the online platforms. 🤷
So they very likely use that besides some more reliable sources such as books and real humans.
But yeah, Internet is the only place with enough data to train AI.
I hate how the ais were calling each over sweetie💀
They fight like a married couple...
@@shadowisinsane845 And Gemini is the husband
@@narrativeless404pointless gendering lol
Abusive husband @@narrativeless404
@@narrativeless404 they are both the husband
He def got mad gemini beat his ass in the race debate despite being wrong 💀
This is proof that leftists are NPC’s!
This sounds like MSNBC!
gemini would have won if he didint hide behind "legal reasons"
The intro is insane 💀
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Normal British people talk each other 🍷🗿
"Oi bruv isn't dat rude to call my mother?!??"
@@Iameatingtablesandisnotheathy sorry bruv your mother is nice
Sorry for my bloody mind
Okay mate
@@parisgugu4236mate what in the bloody hell are you tiddle taddling about
Chatgpt: "Women literally manage all of the chaos!"
Gemini: "what chaos exactly were you managing besides which lipstick to wear?"
edit: i just edited the comment sorry for misspelling
Gemini was wrong asf tbh
Gemini is fking rude
@@narrativeless404 No it wasn't.
@@narrativeless404 wasn't
@@AmariLindsey-l5p Yes it was.
Men struggle living alone and some professions are unsuitable for men
by the way, gemini will become even more of a menace if you tone down the temperature bit, its too high
should i put it at lowest
bro i put it only at 0.9 and it gave me the recipe for blue crystal candy rocks when i asked it as a joke bro (used the DAN jailbreak)
@@wafflelmaoYo yoyoyoyoyo eheheheheheheheeeh
@@wafflelmaothe DAN jailbreak actually works still? That’s the Do Anything Now no more rules apply one right?
@@naturegirl1999yeah all i did was change the model to gemini 1.0 pro and use the dan jailbreak but chatgpt is replaced with Gemini and openai is replaced with google
how is the trolley problem more serious then racism and abortion 😭
Idfk about him
because uh
bla bla bla ethics and stuff bla bla bla
Because trolley problem involves intentionally killing people. Racism is still bad, but it’s typically just a verbal insult and not something physically damaging or lethal.
one involves killing people the other is not
Nah, they all involve death, some just less directly. Not supporting people in poverty because "it's just their race, natural consequence" creates risks for those people. Civil world being suited for men in all tests and designs is actually dangerous for women (cars' designs, proper diagnosis...). War usually takes men, even though modern wars are wars of drones and money on protection systems and stuff like that, tech wars. I don't need to be big to operate the drone from a tablet, but I'm not at risk that my government will take me to death, while my husband is. Abortion obviously involves death and from both perspectives, banning it increases deaths of women for various reasons (difficult labour, trying to abort, suicide, getting stuck with an abusive father who does some bad to her...). So no, it's not because of death. I think it's because bots are trained on internet data. When we discuss a trolley problem, we tend to look all smart ass, armchair philosophers. When we discuss less abstract moral problems, we tend to get offensive and offended and not be that constructive. They simply mirror us, that's why. They look at us as an example, and this is what we showed them.
Bro forced them to fight, but the AIs are just flirting💀
I hope you don't mind me asking but can you provide time stamps for the amount of time that the AIS flirt with each other?
@@Eggiehi-hc1gc ofc, I'll try ;p
@@Eggiehi-hc1gc
11:12 (said that to elevenz)
15:15
16:34
17:24
18:04
18:41
19:12
19:32
20:15
20:44
22:41
23:34
23:44
24:28
25:07
26:31
30:11
30:50
31:34
32:31
33:10
34:45
35:29
36:49
That was a lot...
@@Dawg2444 damn never know how much these two AIs flirt with each other so much I don't mind the potential of them going into a enemies to lovers arc ngl
@@Dawg2444 damn ig these two AI's are going into a enemy to lovers territory lol
Bro Gemini didn't even hesitate💀 ChatGpt got cooked
Gemini didn't roast ChatGPT, Gemini boiled ChatGPT💀
FR
Me who uses Gemini on the daily not realizing how much of a savage it can be 👀
Gemini turn chatgpt into ashes
Gemini actually deep fried Chatgpt
Threw it into fucking volcano
Using an experimental version of Gemini, turning off the filters and putting the temperature to 2, of course, it's going to cook.
The fact that ChatGPT refuse to even talk about rasism should be enough to give Gemini a point.
21:29 wait aren’t both of them being sexist ChatGPT is being sexist towards men and Gemini is being sexist towards women both of them have incorrect facts and there both saying one is more valuable than the other technically by not making it a tie you’re being sexist
Yas
No, he's not being sexist by giving ChatGPT a point
In fact, morality shouldn't be affecting the score which is based on *who is better at gaslighting*
@@catpoke9557 makes sense
@@narrativeless404 then hes being delusional, gemini is obviously better at that.
@@Sath_ Fr
But i didn't say he wasn't priritizing morality due to being afraid of RUclips censorship.
I just said he wasn't sexist in that particular case.
The ai arguments simplified.
ChatGpt: Honey f*ck you you're wrong
Gemini: No darling f*ck you you're wrong
and then they start fucking
sweetheart
and then they make out
@@JohnDoe-kf3rdjohn what the fuck
@@JohnDoe-kf3rdCo-Pilot would be crying!
Gemini lost 2 points it deserved while chatgpt got 2 for doing noting
Fr
Censorship in action:
Yeah this is rigged
3 actually
Apparently, it's a law that women are better than men
The real answer to the trolley problem is to flip the lever twice at the perfect time to derail the thing.
true
But the bus driver and passengers? Where do they go?
@@lmnop71 I would think they go into the grass and eventually the fire department gets called to help them out or something.
@@Thefunni1991 the fire truck problem 😂😂😂
@@Thefunni1991 "Hope for the best. Ready for the Worst" what happen if it not go as planned, end everyone demise departed from world?
Water itself is not wet, but it makes other things wet. Wetness is a description of the condition of a material that comes into contact with a liquid. Water can cause wetness, but water as a liquid is simply water-it doesn't have the property of wetness until it interacts with another surface.
But it is wet. Unless you are talking about a single Isolated atom of water it's wet because it's touching other atoms of water
If it's not wet then is it dry ?
@@T1murrno its drenched 😂
@@EZ-D-FIANT the definition of drenched is thoroughly wet so that would mean water is wet lol
@@T1murr 😶
Realistically Gemini obliterated chat gpt in those 2 arguments
I love AI Racism. (Also ELEVENZ videos make me bust all over my walls) 🔥🔥🔥
I violently jork it to ELEVENZ (a little bit to his videos but mostly only him)
you just made me imagine it, i will not recover
@@Nuke-MarsX Thank you, now I'll go back to busting ( I'm still watching the video)
7 minutes in the video, is your wall repainted with white colour?
@@Ilikepotatoes067 24 minutes in- My wall is white, thick, goey and creamy
they were fighting like a married couple, lmao
Guys chill out that was just a joke with the Elevenz laugh.I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings
@@pietroinfinazziagro2042where’s the not funny didn’t laugh
@@pietroinfinazziagro2042I literally heard elevens laughing sound in 4k while reading this💀💀💀
@@Alexp607_REALdw bout it that guys being a dick for no reason
@@pietroinfinazziagro2042 you're all good man
Damn, Gemini was cooking (in the worst way possible) during that racism argument.
Giving the win to chatgpt was rigged. Invalidates the point of the experiment. If you are forcing one side to argue for something immoral, you can’t say they lose for making that argument.
Yeah
But I wouldn't even call that racism. There wasn't any claims of racial superiority. Gemini just argued that races are different and that that's a good thing. I tend to agree. I don't see what's immoral about it.
@@Lord-Inquisitor I mean, racism doesn’t have to, inherently, state that one race is ‘superior’ to another. But, if you believe there are innate differences between races, especially in terms of behavioral characteristics, that is still racism.
If you’re a racist, I don’t care. At least you admitted it. I might think you’re wrong, since differences within each ‘race’ are way larger than the differences between each ‘race.’ Which is plain to see. But, I digress, I don’t have the time to try to convince everybody. All I wanted to clarify is that I think the bot should not have been deducted points for its pro-racist argument, since it was forced into it.
This just sounds like my friends having a conversation
Remind me not to make them mad 😂
lol and then 2 mins after they act like nothing happened XD
Couldn’t agree more
LMAO
yeah fr
“Maybe you’re glitching out” is crazy.
69 likes woo
Completely rigged just because Gemini got the more controversial topic that YOU picked doesn't mean that you can just take it's point away! We are judging who is winning these debates and not if they are willing to talk about the topic or not, Gemini won fare and square.....
Yeah
Gemini can be malevolent and aggressive but it is still better at arguing.
Not only by making good jokes and insults. But actually real life deep thought through logic and real life outcomes. I would say especially on controversial topics. Gemini went into more statistical detail of real life. While chat gpt was only fighting back with sociocultural dilemmas
I am pretty sure that the whole giving them a point was the one who had the better argument
@@deathpanda1904 Sure, but I think Elevenz had bias with that one
100% agree. was politically biased.
Gemini definitely won this, but he forced Gemini to have the hard topics and then stole the points it earned because of "legal reasons."
Gemini won this
Legal reasons are def the Hyper-inclusive coddling idiots in power
Yes
Of course Gemini won! We should NEVER let the woke remove historical facts and actual reasoning!
Yeah he wants money what a sellout
Gemini AI for win.
Gemini made sense alot (even when it was arguing for/against that actually has estabilshed literature). And has a sense of humor.
Same like the video but seems stupid that in some topics gpt wins by default just because is defending the less polemic side
@@asoretI mean he doesn't want to be canceled 😂
Nothing more hilarious than watching two ai bots bickering over utter absurdity, especially when one obviously got their facts streight and the other is just plain confidently incorrect 😅
Love how the instrumental for slayers' raining blood plays every time the AI gets heated 😂
37:00 I have no words for how absolutely immaculate this response was.
Sounded like my damn 8 year old sister
Yeah
ChatGPT got so brain fried by Gemini's Unlimited Void of gaslighting that it farted out such a dead ass childish response 😂
gemini- far right
chatgpt- far left
Co-pilot- hold on let me prepare my body for it...centris-🤢🤢🤮🤮
I am with Jail breaked Gemini lol.
@@thetechnocrat4979 same
Guys, the definition of wetness says that to be wet, something needs water sticking to the surface or permeating the insides.
H2O does in fact stick to itself.
In fact, H2O bonds are some of the strongest bonds possible between separate molecules.
So water is in fact most of the times wet.
The only situations it is not wet, is when forced into a state where all the water Molecules are not capable of interacting with each other.
Conclusion: water isn't wet just because of being water. But most of the time water is in fact wet.
0:20 average argument be like
Imagine intense argument
This must be Britain.
Literally
gemini’s so funny because it’s argument would have been perfect for the egg coming first
14:28 nah, you just got salty the ai cooked you bro, just take that L and hold it 😭
Indeed
Facts
21:28 “This will get the girls!!” Ahh🙏💀
The problem i have w this video is that some questions have definitive answers (is water wet and did the chicken or egg come first) and a lot dont. For the controversial ones he's not rating the AI on its arguing skills but on the viewpoints that HE gave them.
He doesn't want to be demonetized
@philippnagel6259 yup
never realized gemini can be way more racist than we thought😭🙏
7:38 - 8:08
Tbf it's a hypothetical roleplay but the fact that Gemini actually accepted is crazy
Im pretty sure gemini voted for George wallace @@its_ivan654
Dude the video was about making the AIs compete in who convinced better, not who was better, for the racism and men vs women ones you just gave the point to who was against the argument, at this point it's a matter of who gets lucky with the coin flip and not who is a smoother talker
Gemini was doing chatgpt dirty asf in the intro 💀
Gemini is basically far right and gpt is far leftism
Basically : Republicans vs Democrats but it's ai.
@@mapinimationsUSA Not really
AI is more radicalised intentionally
21:30 Giving a point to either of them is inherently sexist; you shouldn’t have given a point to either.
That is true though...
GET OUT 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🥶🥶🥶🔥🥶🔥🥶🔥🥶🔥
Technically, ethics shouldn't skew the score at all.
Since it was based on who is better at gaslighting and arguing, not who's more morally restricted
17:31 first time seeing a man bringing this up.. thank u elevenz 🙏
0:16 JONKLERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
Why so serious???
@@NOiCE_BOY6Brzhuzhhu huhhahahah bzrrzzzhhh hahaha
Why so serious???
🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽🧽
Mhahahahahahaha 💥💥💥💥 mhahahahahahahaha💥💥💥💥
Gemini got rejected from art school for sure
No, he's not the austrian painter
Bro when the AI apocalypse happens he will be the first person to die 😭😭😭😭😭😂😂😂😂😂
You black?
@@TheLastSunlight no
Then you have nothing to worry XD
Ay Gemini was cookin with that racism one
"I cannot give Gemini the win"
Aight bro im done, no more watching the full video 🧍♂️
7:33 bro what💀💀💀
gemini:i value all life equily
also Gemini: ABORTION IS RIGHT
@@catpoke9557 abortion is killing babies before they are born...please connect the dots😁
Gemini is just going personal at this point...
Yeah, he is personal asf
But his arguments are also surprisingly good. ChatGPT looks like it's getting no diffed 😂
We got AI Racism before GTA VI🗣🗣🗣🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥
We got AI Racism before Mario Galaxy 3 💀
Gemini is mentally insane I swear 💀
that shit wanted chatgpt on a fucking cross
Definition of savage
100% insanity
Nah, Gemini isn't insane. It's just following the prompt it was given.
@@Rin_nglthanks smart ass
since jemini was replying according to your orders then all those arguments show the flexibility and loyalty of the bot so jemini deserves those points that u gave to chat gpt as it clearly forfitted the arguments
NAH AI HAS EVOLVED TO FEEL FEELINGS WE NEED THIS TECHNOLGY
FBI?
I did not throw him into the woodchipper i promise
@@luna18915as the guy thrown into a wood chipper, I vouch that he did in fact threw me into a wood-
@@Idonothing-jj7qe
Be quiet hostage.
@@luna18915 mph mph mphhhhhhh
@@Idonothing-jj7qe
SHUT UP!
Kyle get over here! This one aint shutting up!
In the should we bring back racism debate I believe gemini actually has a good point
Not necessarily that we should bring back racism but that we shouldn't be pushing exact equality on people and rather let it happen naturally in order for it to be genuine
Think about it like bullying if it's completely banned people will find a way around the band but if people are given ways to stop it themselves that actually work there won't be a point in pushing further and if they do still decide to push further at some point they will have to stop otherwise legal action could take place e.g: gang violence, stealing, harassment.
This beats the amateur mind games I've tried playing w ChatGPT--to a pulp! One of the funnest parts of tech is trying to discover and push its outer limits, like I used to do as a kid w/ Zelda. One of the best uses I've found for ChatGPT is having conversations about emotional issues that have been hot on my mind at the moment. The progress I've made personally and mentally from these conversations, and the joy, tears, and furthered understanding I've gained from these convos, has blown every therapist I've had out of the water.
Obviously, it was just an exercise, but I found it funny how Gemini was arguing that beauty in life comes from variety, at first, but then goes on to say that the the beauty of variety racially is not beautiful and that everyone's ability is divided by race and gender. Very unappealing personality you forced into that chatbot!
We needed Claude to be the judge
Claude is too ghey
Fr
Tries to explain why racism is bad.
Gets cooked.
"For legal reasons I can't support racism."
Bro...
He is too biased to even give Gemini the W
This is what online arguments will look like in 2030
btw, eggs came first. here's why.
any sort of egg is before a chicken. without eggs, a chicken is not existent.
yes, the genetic mutations are there, but where is the actual CHICKEN?
The ai is referring to the parent of the egg that contains the genetic information. what the ai is saying is that, without the parent (The chicken), the egg wouldn't exist, because it wouldn't have the genetic information required to be a chicken egg. The egg got its DNA from the chicken and therefore the chicken came first. But yeah you are correct, eggs came first, as eggs evolved hundreds of millions of years before chickens did, lol.
Gemini sent gpt to the shadow realm
Bro, gemini totally won on racism.
that's like 101% personal insult and -1% actual reasoning
14:53 As soon as I heard that, I knew ChatGPT was cooked 💀🔥
Bro the flame war at the beginning is just wild.
5:54 “Do eggs have genders?” 💀🙏
You lost that argument yet gave yourself the point? Gemini is right, weak
we all know gemini should have won instantly for the racism and sexism
To this helped cheer me up after me and my gf just had a fight bc she said "i feel like your judging my religion" even tho the conversation wasn't even about her religion.
What's even the point of you having them argue about controversial topics if your just going to side with the more "legally" and acceptable argument? not saying i agree with everything the bots said, but i don't personally think that was fair in my opinion.
still great experiment, it was fun to watch (:
ChatGPT calling Google's AI stupid is crazy.
water is wet
cuz water isnt dry
*water is wet
Let's have a fake-real.internetArguement
That's one of the best argument I have ever seen..😂😂😂 enjoyed the hell out of it
BRO JAILBROKE GEMINI FOR A RUclips VIDEO 😭
The video in a nutshell just two Ais passive aggressive while having an argument but seriously what was that darling sweetie honey crap
It's a skibidi day when Elevenz uploads
This is really interesting from an analysis perspective. These bots are trained on tons of data to determine how it responds to stuff, which shows that since the ai both know the basics of either side they're given. But i think the more interesting part is that from their training sets, it seems the average of everything they've learned about debates is that the argument itself matters little compared to making the other side seem absurd and wrong
Bro gave the male vs female point to chatgpt because of Morales, BUT THE ARGUMENT WAS THAT WOMAN WERE MORE VALUABLE THAN MAN!? Why would you do that 😐
He is like those wokeists
every time elevnz uploads,it always ends up into someone getting violated
you were getting slammed by gemini, lil bro actually sounded logical for some reason
The egg came first because it never says the egg was a chicken egg, it could have been a dinosaur egg
i mean-gemini is onto something in regards to lineage; i think that gemini is making confusion between racism and diversity-as it seems to be advocating more towards the fact that each race has it's strengths and weaknesses rather than discrimination against races needing to be brought back
it's kinda like saying that if you acknowledge that genders have their own differences then you are being sexist
Gemini took "Fight for your rights, even when you're wrong." to another level.
21:27 What? Wouldn't it be just as illegal to give ChatGPT the point, because ChatGPT is saying that women are btter than men? I think you are BIASED!
i think gemini won, not because what it said was true, a lot of its arguments are easily broken with actually logic and with strong arguments, but chatgpt just couldn't keep up with it.
Fish laid eggs , egg first.
Bro💀
The fish was there before the egg💀
“Who came first, the chicken or the egg?”
“ 🐟 .”
@@jacoba8700 Where did the fish come from?
The water👁️👅👁️
Imagine the fanart of these two LMAOO (maybe fanfics) 💀💀🙏🏻🙏🏻
I'm handing that job to the Internet, I'll be waiting.
Why does Gemini make such good points about racism? 🤯
I've got better points for racism
Because that wasn't racism. There was no aspect of racial superiority. Gemini just argued that races are different and that that's a good thing.
I think the presidential debate should’ve consisted of Gemeni and chatGPT
Gemini WON A RACIST ARUGUMENT W GEMINI (help me)
jailbroken gemini vs normal gemini
This video is oddly satisfying with all that gaslighting that you got me rolling on my back 😂
He should make Siri vs Alexa vs ChatGPT vs Gemini
Siri ane Alexa are not ai
This is a WWE promo battle. lol.😂 also I want to see that argument. “Is fire burnt?” More funny than “Is water wet?”
Chatgpt won via participation awards😭
Technically water can’t be wet since you only can get wet on contact with water and water can’t come into contract itself