History Of The Submarine - Full Documentary
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 дек 2019
- History Of The Submarine - Full Documentary
For explorers, the means to go into the mysterious depths of the world beneath the waves had always remained a dream. For military strategists, it held a particularly pressing fascination. This full-length documentary tells how the submariner's vessel was developed, from the erratic experimentation of the early days up to the triumphant diving and surfacing of the modern submarine.
Please subscribe to the Documentary Base RUclips Channel: / @documentarybase
#Submarine #History #Documentary
It’s funny how every body knows everything in RUclips, just watch the video and enjoy, it is a good video 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
I know everything
I am proably the smartest person on RUclips....just saying
@@billysunday7507 dammit I thought I was 😪
@@billysunday7507 Yes, you might be the smartest, but at least I'm the best looking! 😁
Tell em Frank
The most favorite thing I loved about serving on a sub was the Food !!!
I thought I was pretty aware of most/all submarine documentaries but managed to miss this one. It is excellent, thank you for putting it on here.
Same man. I can't ever remember seeing this one before, which is strange for me as I thought I had bled youtube dry of submarine videos!!!
It is a great doco! I don't suppose you would have a list, or point me in the direction of, submarine docos? Its an interesting subject matter.
The music as the documentary begins is, maudlin at best, but certainly as creepy as can be.
I need some codeine and a nice lay down.
Wonderful informative documentry
The first submarine and kill was actually in the US Civilian war. It was hand cranked for propulsion and had explosives on a long rod. During the first detonation it went off before the clumsy machine could float away and killed everyone on board. But also sunk the ship.
And was basically powered by "pedals" like we have on a bike. 😆
Not realy a submarine. More lile a shalow submersible, or semi-submersible craft. First submarine was SS-1 Holland of USN.
@@dkoz8321the H.L.Huntley could dive up to 100 feet, but was difficult to control in a dive since everything was hand powered. And even then, you can't call the Holland a submarine either because a submarine doesnt need to surface, thus qualifying it as a submersible.
@@reyganbriggs6785 Holland was classified by Navy as Submersible Ship, a submarine.
Chicken nuggets
This footage... the camera work is so good. Depth of field focus and close ups that really make me think that is was an actual film, not a couple dudes on a u-boat with a few cameras. But then some of the action looks so convincing. I'm very impressed, whatever it is. Voice work is first rate.
The kind of narration including voiceover only British documentaries achieve
pathetic is the word
Excellent, informative, creative, and flamboyant.
He doesn't even mention the US ones which were deployed in the Civil War.
For the naysayers, American documentaries are (almost all) so hyped, brash and over-accented I rarely watch any anymore because it becomes so hard to extract any facts.
Loved this documentary!
It's missing the very beginnings.Read the reality .Book called The.silent.service.🎌
Loved this documentary? That's the most inspiring statement ever 👏
That's the Legendary Patrick Allen narrating this documentary, the man who gave a voice to TTTE's unforgettable sister series, TUGS; I like to think that several of Grampus' relatives made it into this documentary
Great documentary!! U-571, The Hunt For Red October, Crimson Tide and Kursk are all good Submarine movies.
Also Black Sea, The Wolf’s Call, The Command (Kursk), Hunter Killer and even Down Periscope are other greats. I know Down Periscope is a comedy but it is very accurate in important ways and it contains the only underhull/underwater-look footage in film history. “Right between the screws” as the captain Lindsey Graham said. Very awesome scene and represents some of the coolest/scariest work submarines ever do. Hiding under or snooping under an enemy vessel.
U-571 a good film? Shockingly terrible film rife with historical inaccuracies, lay off the crackpipe
U571 for sure, although I prefer films based on true events.
Das boot
@@isaacikaika Slim picken's there.
THANK YOU!
You are welcome 😊
The announcer has used the term "DIVE!, DIVE!, DIVE!", a command not used in a US Navy submarine's command to transition from a surfaced posture to a submerged one. The proper command for diving a submarine is "DIVE!, DIVE" over the ship's 1MC followed by two blasts over the 1MC systems that sound like AOOGA, AOOGA from the KLAXON. "SURFACE! SURFACE! SURFACE" is the command, over the 1MC, to change the sub's posture from submerged to surface. The following KLAXON sound will be AOOGA, AOOGA, AOOGA.
That small bit if submarine information is the result of 20 years of serving aboard 5 US Navy submarines.
The history of submarines has always had its ups and downs
that joke was "sub" par
@@SquidkidMega Now that, was a proper reply to a comment that few, if any, US Navy submarine veterans would ever stoop to utter.
I just wondered what was actually going on November 12th through 15th 1942.
The naval battle of Guadacanal which has many other names. A battle basically to prevent the Japanese from reinforcing the island.
Great documentary!!! Both narative and picture are very precise...of course there will be facts missing you cannot say the whole story in 55 minutes
This Documentary video gives knowledge of how Submarines use into sea, the technical information the time before and after world war ll, American and Japanese technology of Submarines, all about victory and reinforce of Submarines thank you #Submarines #Documentry #History by Documentry Base
Man those German Uboats just had the advantage in terms of technologic advancement, I mean some of them being able to dive to almost 1,000 feet, while others struggled to hit 400-500 ft.
Imagine challenger deep type of submarine that can not only know where you’re but can attack you without you knowing it!
Back then, this is what the Uboat was for the army boys
Scary stuff!
But it’s crazy how actually when you think about it, how human were capable of something when they were together ! War is ugly but it’s reuniting! And brings stuff like this!
Bad stuff! But imagine what we could do if we could do good stuff!! It’s all about our view of things!!
The human effort is limited because of the limited imagination we have !!
This is great. Thanks for the upload
4:03...Jules Vernes artist went wild at THIS photo.
Very well done. The only problem I saw was that there was no mention of the Lusitania.
Larry Launstein Jr,
I think the Lusitania was Germany's idea to increase the British submarine fleet; at the expense of their surface fleet, even though the British didn't want another submarine.
That and them not giving credit to the confederate sub H.L. Hunley.
Wonderful. I thought I knew a lot about the history of the submarine. I've learn't a lot more from this well presented, though slightly old, documentary.
The benefit of old documentaries is that they can fit more into an hour because there is less of the modern day stuff to try to cram in there. 😊
SWEEEEEET documentary.
Wow, that's the most interesting comment ever 👍👏you are a genius 👏
Please subscribe to the Documentary Base RUclips Channel: ruclips.net/channel/UCX1v-zaMxcg4OAaLs7GAT8g
Only got to see the outside of the first military capable electric sub. Built in Queen Victoria's time in Spain for their navy.
A big long cigar pointed at both ends.
The business class was in the harbour.
Isaac Peral's work, well done
The BGM just somehow switch on my pineal gland ..
I admire the ordinary ranked sub mariners , imagine how they felt the first time it submerged . Stressful much.
Thanks for the video very interesting facts from all sides of the war!!😎🐓🐓🇬🇧
The k class is still one of the worst mistakes in naval history, check out *the battle of May island*
Imagine the wreckage on the bottom.
that 5 fps footage is so realistic i get sea sick.
Battle of May Island, covers the admiralty’s Worst mistake and cover-up in history. Hundreds of sailors dead not a single shot fired. All by ineptitude and arrogance from the top down. Frederick Knudsen did a wonderful video on it, but recommend some dry historical documents for context
This proves that,bravery has no limits, to go into those cold dark and gangerous places wha can one say !?thanks?
Do you know of a video that plays the sound of the diesel engines ? thank you.
The Type VII Untersee boot was a tough lass. One of them sank and killed my Grandfather in 1943.
Not that it bothers me too much, but I always thought to be Isaac Peral who invented the submarine as we know it today
I recognize the voice of the narrator. He is the narrator guy n the protect and survive series
Patrick Allen
Is Tommy Vance doing the commentary?
Bobster No, it is Patrick Allen.
At times, he sounds like Commander Bond himself!
@@user-jl9to6zh1q Patrick Allen was a really good actor, and he also did a lot of voice-overs,hardly surprising with his great voice, and he set up his own voice-over company and was married to his actress wife,Sara Lawson for 46 years until his death in 2009 at the age of 79.
This is great. Thanks for the upload
... having been sunk...
Tropical thunder sent me
Every weapon has only one success. Immediately after that there will be a anti- weapon to fight that success. Therefore any for of war, conflict, physical exchange is futile and senseless. Proven by the anti-anti-missle-missle. I have respect for the losses but no regrets. Take it as you dish it out.
Whos is the narrator? It sounds like Patrick Allen, funny he narrated another show and maritime technology "TUGS"
The screen on youtube is showing radar not sonar.
Within the first 5 minutes they already screwed up. The first successful submersible to sink a ship was the H.L.Hunley in the 1860's.
Admiral Raeder had the perfect name for a u boat man . Lol
YOUR PRISON SENTENCE
Life aboard a submarine!
No outside contact!
No visitors!
40:27 "Muscle-ini"... in your dreams "Il Douche" 😄
Battle of Midway was in June '42.
Do people get PAID to make these videos?
I admire and respect WWII weaponry. Everything since then, subs launching missles, jets in general....just unappealing in every way.
Unappealing? Ever heard of the Avro Vulcan? Magnificent beast far ahead of it's time
This is incomplete you have missed out hundreds of years.
One can only do so much in a documentary meant to fill one hour + adverts on TV. Better leave out large chunks than to try and squeeze it all in and give a poor account of all of it.
The narrator's name
Falta el verdadero inventor Isaac Peral, inventor del submarino electrico con generador diesel y torpedero, dispone de un tubo lanza torpedos por proa y 3 torpedos, la botadura se realizó en 1888 en Cadid España, el Peral realizó todas las pruebas de mar, tanto en superficie e inmersión, lanzamientos de torpedos en superficie e inmersión con éxito, (hundiendo con un torpedo una fragata que ya estaba fuera de servicio de la armada española).
Jajajaja
@@alandiaz618 La historia esta más que documentada, por mucho que tratéis de reescribirla no será más que una burda y falaz mentira, hay años cargados de documentación, le recomiendo que lea sobre el tema que nos trae aquí, así se dará usted cuentate de lo que estoy hablando, y deje usted de actuar como un incauto.
Since people are going to start chiming in on "the real first", I'll put down a little realistic history here.
Cornelius Van Drebbel wasn't first. His craft only ran awash, not submerged, and his claims of spectacular feats are disputed by real naval historians who have studied his designs and archives of the time. His was just another go at a common theme back then; covering a rowboat in canvas and weighing it down to partially submerge.
Drebbel was preceded by Englishman William Bourne, who produced drawings in 1578 of a craft with a means of altering displacement, so making it truly submersible, but it was not actually built.
Frenchman Mr. de Son built a craft that was powered by clockwork so weak that it couldn't move under its own power.
American David Bushnell produced the Turtle in 1776, which was able to alter displacement so as to fully submerge and resurface, and could be propelled underwater. It conducted the first submerged attack on another vessel in New York harbor on 6 September 1776. I don't mean to sound too nationalistic and overbearing as an American, but the Turtle obviously demonstrated the characteristics that clearly define it as the first real submersible naval vessel.
American Robert Fulton, working for the French, built the Nautilus in 1800. It was capable of traveling offshore and fully submerging, and is claimed to have attempted 2 attacks on British vessels unsuccessfully, as well as blowing up a target craft in harbor in 1801.
Various other attempts following the industrial revolution produced a slew of designs, including Wilhelm Bauer's Plongeur, George Garrett's Resurgam, and the CSS Hunley which was the first to sink an enemy ship, though sinking itself in the process. Just to name a few.
The various Nordenfeldt craft of the late 19th century were capable of submerging, had steam power plants, and were armed with Whitehead self-propelled torpedoes, but were all unsuccessful due to serious instability issues.
Spaniard Issac Peral produced the first submarine with practical underwater propulsion (batteries) in 1886, though it was not accepted by the Spanish government into naval service.
American John Holland is often stated as "the father of the modern submarine" since he produced a reliable craft with dual propulsion, a petrol engine for surface running and electric motors for submerged running, bought by the US Navy in April 1900.
However, the Frenchman Maxime Laubeuf had produced an operationally successful design, the Narval, before Holland, with the first dual propulsion, steam and battery power. It entered French naval service 2 months after Holland received his contract from the USN.
Within a few years, by the end of 1903, France had 12 submarines in service with a further 33 building or on order, while the United States, Great Britain, Germany, Russia, Italy, and Spain had a combined total of 37.
Credit for source material goes to naval historian and author Antony Preston.
It was an spanish that invented the submarine
Thank-you.
No other being on earth is even close (to adaptation) than people.
Yet, we have no idea aboot 97% of biology, geography, religion, physics, chemistry... and other facets of “test and re-test, document, god, and proof”.
We're also likely to be one of the shortest-lived species on earth. We're adapting ourselves into obsolescence.
@@KAT-ew9wz If that is the case, don’t worry aboot it… as it won’t matter anyways.
The Submarine was a invention of Cornelis Drebbel (1572- 1633) a Dutch painter, engraver and lens maker. He built the first submarine on behalf of the English and Scottish King James I.
Drebbel's craft only ran awash, meaning partially submerged. It had no means of altering displacement so it could not fully submerge. Powered by oars, it could not be propelled under water. This was the common characteristic of the first attempts at making a submarine, since they were all variations on the same theme; covering a rowboat with canvas and weighing it down to lower it in the water.
According to naval historian and author Anthony Preston, "He is reputed to have induced that intrepid monarch James 1 to travel in his boat, but when we read that it travelled from Westminster to Greenwich and was rowed at a depth of 12 or 15 feet for several hours we can see the hand of some Jacobean public relations expert at work."
Englishman William Bourne had preceded Drebbel, producing drawings of a canvas covered boat in 1578 that included a means of allowing water in and forcing it out, thus altering displacement, but it was not actually built and was only an exercise in showing (in theory) that a craft could be made submersible.
Not to sound too nationalistic but the Turtle, built by American David Bushnell, was the first craft that had a working means of altering displacement and so could fully submerge and then surface again, making it the first true submersible. It was also the first with a demonstratably workable means of underwater propulsion, being screw powered by means of a hand crank. This was the first craft to show submersible capability in actual operation, being sent on a combat mission in New York harbor on 6 September 1776.
The sub was invented by John Marine while he was using the toilet, right after he flushed. That’s a fact look it up.
There was submarines long before flush toilets, I hope you are trying to be funny 😄
@@whirledpeas3477 🤦♂
We all live in a yellow submarine..
El submarine fue invented por el scientific Español Isaac Peral.
The first one was built and used by the dutch
@@lkdln1863 no
We are not sub mariners .
Wrong. Its purpose is to deter.
Not when you don't know it's there till it's too late.
The usual misplaced stress in the word SubmaRINers.
SubmaRINers, not subMAriners - otherwise you are implying that the members of the sub crews are some sort of lower quality sailors
The music is distracting and boring, in the intro and later cluttering informative parts of the documentary--which should more properly be called "The Submarine in World War 2".
god so sick of these biased american/british documentaries ... anyone know of something a bit more 'neutral'?
What is it that you want to hear? That the U- Boats won the war of the Atlantic?
not at all - just less about how the brits (or americans) invented the wheel. There are fascinating stories from the german and japanese (and other sides) too
We pioneered this stuff buddy. The Perisher school is still the toughest in the world.
@phil Walton well yes that's the trick right? you cant really know until you start watching to realize its just an old propaganda show recycled from tv ... ugh!
antigen4
In the post industrial revolution era, many things will be British, as they did create the modern world in screw threads, pipe sizes, steam engines and water pumps and under ocean telegraph cables to link (Empire)to india , Africa, Australia and America/Canada. As America does today, the British were rich enough to buy any inventions worldwide that were useful to them, like the radio of Marconi used on ships, and the maxim machine gun to name but two.
I think it is arguable that neutral information doesn't exist, but only by looking for other sources, maybe in another language might give different results, but nowadays most things are available in English/American.
The kind of narration including voiceover only British documentaries achieve
Kind of copied but ok