I've represented myself in court in 15 different actions, and I won 12 of them! It cost me next to nothing and cost the other guy enough to buy a house. I love it! Attorneys want you to believe you can't, or shouldn't, represent yourself in court. One reason they do this is obvious, they don't want the competition and loss of income. The other reason is they want you to believe civil court is some king of mystical palace where the average person will get lost.
Liars are not clever. They leave a whole sloppy mess of evidence. If ur a poor person they waive all the fees and everything else is self explanatory. Self representation is free and trusted representation with God on ur side
Deuteronomy 6:12-25 be careful that you do not forget the Lord , who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. Fear the Lord your God, serve him only and take your oaths in his name. Do not follow other gods, the gods of the peoples around you; for the Lord your God, who is among you, is a jealous God and his anger will burn against you, and he will destroy you from the face of the land. Do not put the Lord your God to the test as you did at Massah. Be sure to keep the commands of the Lord your God and the stipulations and decrees he has given you. Do what is right and good in the Lord ’s sight, so that it may go well with you and you may go in and take over the good land the Lord promised on oath to your ancestors, thrusting out all your enemies before you, as the Lord said. In the future, when your son asks you, “What is the meaning of the stipulations, decrees and laws the Lord our God has commanded you?” tell him: “We were slaves of Pharaoh in Egypt, but the Lord brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand. Before our eyes the Lord sent signs and wonders-great and terrible-on Egypt and Pharaoh and his whole household. But he brought us out from there to bring us in and give us the land he promised on oath to our ancestors. The Lord commanded us to obey all these decrees and to fear the Lord our God, so that we might always prosper and be kept alive, as is the case today. And if we are careful to obey all this law before the Lord our God, as he has commanded us, that will be our righteousness.”
I can say that I represented myself and I did get abused for not knowing the procedure, but what they didn't expect was my persistence. I lost at trial but on appeal, I convinced the judge to remand the case back to the lower court, where I then won. Defending yourself is absolutely a daunting task, but if you know you are right and you have the fortitude to represent yourself you can absolutely win.
Good for you my friend. In the four years since I created this video there has been some recognition in various courts that self-represented persons should be treated with respect, and that judges must do more to 'assist' ordinary people who are forced to represent themselves. I'll be re-launching this channel in October 2021 and will be able to devote more time to educating both citizens and the legal profession about the realities of self-representation in the courts. Citizens deserve access to justice, but the system is established and operated to favour members of the legal profession - not to bring justice people deserve. Cheers and keep up the good fight.
My family ripped me off for over 100 grand when my mom died.Well i have been fighting in court and only have 900 dollars into this fight paying for lawyers.They have 26 000 grand into this fight for lawyers.We going to the jury now and i will be repensenting myself all the way.If i loose in court, they get nothing becuase im judgement free.I own nothing no house.If i win they pay me the 100 grand plus the 60 grand fight me.I will not surrender.Wish me luck im going for it.
I prayed to Christ many times but still got beat up. Christ has Yazidi girls getting banged in the ass by ISIS fighters to worry about, and he still can't b bothered to help them, so imagine how he feels about your petty court case...
Stand up for yourself in the American justice system in the courtroom you will fall I'm not saying don't try to do what's right I'm saying this guy is right you can't win walk away
Do any of you people know the difference between common law and admiralty law? Do any of you know the difference between natural rights and civil rights? Has anyone of you done any research to have actual proof to place a FACTUAL opinion vs. listening to people with no facts to back up their opinions that they have been brainwashed with all their lives. I don't believe any of you people can present actual facts in the form of citations written their law books in which their operate from and use against you due to your IGNORANCE evidenced by your unsupported unverified OPINIONS. the courts do not have an American flag which is a flag without a gold fringe with tassels around it. A gold fringed flagcan be found in every courtroom today because they are operating under admiralty maritime law not your common law which is your Bill of Rights as was created from our forefathers and the Declaration of Independence 1776 the unincorporated United States of America hence the states Union will the union of stateswhich is not part of the United States located in the District of Columbia.to make my point clear the United States is located in the District of Columbia it is a federal Corporation and you can read it for yourself under title 28USC 3002 15A. To further verify my facts, Google UCC 9 - 307 h. Most Americans are asleep at the wheel. All these courtsa private corporations extorting money out of your people through statutes which are not laws they are penal codes and ordinances violations of their private Corporation and all of us have been categorized as their employees. Are you a FEDERAL CORPORATE EMPLOYEE ? DO YOU RESIDE IN THE UNITED STATES? all of you and most Americans do not know and cannot answer this question correctly due to the ignorance and lack of education in-law only. You shouldknow the correct answer to that question if you have researched the two citations the law codes given above. the constitutional United States of America unincorporated under our Declaration of Independence of 1776 is that unincorporated. The United States is a federal Corporation Department of REVENUE. THEY'RE MAKING MONEY OFF OF YOU WHEN THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION. Do any of you people KNOW the difference between an ARTICLE 1 court and an ARTICLE 3 Court? Article 1 courts are created by congress with limited jurisdiction to only hear cases THAT DEAL WITH COMMERCE. ARTICLE 3 courts are JUDICIAL, COURTS OF RECORD, Supreme Court's. Supreme Court rulings are LAW of the LAND and super seed over statutes which are not laws because you haven't looked up the definition of what is statutes and statutory law in the law dictionaries., Cornell Law is free online but West's can Law, Black's Law and Bouvier's law dictionaries are what the legal system uses for their manipulated definitions of commonly used words that have been manipulated for their own benefit and fool you with this word trickery into their jurisdiction and their control whether in the courtroom or in the streets(Land). Title 22USC chapter 11 Download the FORM COL, FOREIGN REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938. "CREDIT RIVER DECISION". Oh by the way there is no such thing as LOANS in this country. Lol. FRN's Federal Reserve notes???? Article 9-102 (65) PROMISSORY NOTE definition. Public Law 73-10 House joint resolution 192 HJR192, UCC3-104 negotiable INSTRUMENTS UCC3-402b qualified and unqualified SIGNATURES. Google and download - MEMLAW C BANKFRAUD - " D " , IRS PUBLICATION 1212 Pg6 NOMINEE. 1099-OID, 1099-A, 1099-C, FORM 709, 1096, FORM 8281, 1040-V. ALL OF THESE FORMS WE are supposed to be filing because we use FRN'S and PAY Debts with a DEBT Instrument aka FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES (iou's)(Article 1 section 10 it is unconstitutional to pay a debt using a debt instrument) (Federal Reserve notes are not LAWFUL consideration/Money.why ? They have no silver or gold certificate backing it.FACT!) WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE FILING THESE irs DOCUMENTS(provided above) TO RETURN THE FUNDS (bookkeeping entries) TO ITS ORIGINAL SOURCE WHICH IS THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER account. RM10212.001 what is a LEGAL NAME? RM10205.130 BIRTH NAME. POMS =PROGRAMS OPERATING MANUAL SYSTEM read it SSA handbook. > DO you really know what your name and ALL CAPITALS is and refers to? > Do you know the difference between your LEGAL NAME and your BIRTH NAME? .... WHAT is the difference between your short version of your BIRTH CERTIFICATE and your long version which is called The vault copy? TWO BIRTH CERTIFICATES VIDEO on RUclips. Educate yourselves stop being ignorant to the truth. people that speak out of the side of their mouths have no truth nor fact. DOWNLOAD THE SUPREME COURT CASE (above)ONLINE FOR FREE AND READ THE DOCUMENT FOR YOURSELF. IF YOU CANNOT QUITE GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS that's some of us are actually telling you the TRUTH then continue on the same path. maybe it's working for you and hopefully for your future family members. Educate yourselves on AGENDA 21. THESE PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT WANT TO DEPOPULATE SOCIETY AND THE WORLD. I DON'T CARE IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME but I have verified everything I claim and you cannot rebut anything I say as being false, lie, etc.
'Walk away" or pay an attorney, once he drains you financially, to walk away. Honestly, with what attorneys charge hourly, you could pay to put yourself through law school two, if not 3 times over.
Honestly though, he is telling the truth. Pro se is incredibly tough... I've had to research and study and write all day for the last 11 months... it's so exasperating... Sooo many rules, laws and technicalities, forms, motions, filings, trips and calls to the Court, notices, deadlines, proof of services, procedures, favoritism/bias, long lines, parking fees, court fees, waiting on hold, continuances, numerous hearings, it's impossible to learn and do them all... if not for the COVID 19 two month extensions and stay at home order I would never have the time or energy to do or learn it all, nor make the deadlines, ... at all... or especially without going insane... I got new bags under my eyes and my head hurts...as I constantly think and study about my old and new arguments all day and night.. this is a LOT! it's crazy... Luckily everything got extended 2 months... Really think about doing this pro se, seriously. It consumes an incredible amount of your time, energy, intellect, joy, peace of mind, sanity and it still will exhaust your money. I probably could have hired a lawyer with all the time, money and mental exhaustion... but sometimes, you just gotta do it, but be mentally prepared. It's not going to be easy, I don't recommend this to anyone.
Ignore this guy. Fight for the justice that you deserve. Strong facts are very persuasive to a judge (even if you completely bumble your way through the proceedings). Go for what you believe in.
No do not believe this guy if you go and represent yourself you will lose judge's tell you to get a lawyer for a reason I've been trying to fight myself and standing up for what's right and have been push down by a bias judge who heard the facts saw the evidence and the defendant admitted to what she was in contempt of the order and the judge denied the contempt the defendant admitted to being in contempt and the judge because I had no representation but myself i was denied my contempt... walk away if you can stand up for yourself but you will lose
@peter collins I had to read what I wrote it was clear you read what transpired -the facts!!!! Don't put me down because of my experience I'm only telling you what happened to me that could happen to you it's a justice system within itself.. is just for some not for all ..if you don't know the rules of it they don't want you to play their game it's called the black book of law it's a dictionary of words that means different in law then in real world speaking.. we not in the club you have to get a lawyer. A judge was once a lawery and D A's are trying to be judges.
@peter collins explanation is I put her in contempt she admitted to being in contempt the judge denied the contempt.. it's a female judge not a male judge
@peter collins well the judge said that she was to follow a court order she didn't follow the court order that is what makes her in contempt she's in contempt of the court order she admitted not abiding by the court order citing that she's in contempt the judge denied it even after seeing the proof dates written evidence you can site all the law you want contempt is when you break an order.. it's willfully breaking a court order CONTEMPT
I did much better representing myself in family "court" than I did with an overpriced attorney. How can they call it a court when Child Support falls under the Executive Branch while courts are supposed to fall under the Judicial Branch? In "Family Court" you are also stripped of your constitutional right to Due Process. Family Court is a Kangaroo Court where nothing is done in the best interest of the child, it's all about the money as the child support agency is a cooperation, not a government agency and its sole purpose is to make money to keep all the family court employees employed and keep their corrupt agency funded. Have you ever noticed that in family "Court" most cases are heard by "Commissioners" rather than Judges??? It's all very corrupt. Unfortunately the USA is not the home of the Free that they taught us about in grade school. Your "Rights" are worth the paper they are written on and can be thrown away any time the "courts" wish.
ever since you seen the Divorce Corp documentary you represented yourself and won? That documentary allowed you to win and to study to become a paralegal? Where can I get some of what you're smoking?
I was falsely accused of a felony and I lost my career as a security officer. No lawyer will take on my lawsuit against my accuser. I guess I have no choice but to represent myself.
Gonna be representing myself at court in two days because I'm going through a divorce. I don't have money for a lawyer because I spent most of my money on my previous lawyer. I already know that I'm going to lose, I'm not there to win or gain my wife back even though she has an army with her. All I want is to end this divorce as soon as possible and peacefully. I'm not there to bully or intimidate anyone.
I am in court over 2 years and I will win. I am fighting no only for my rights but for over 20,000 Americans who were hurt and They don't know. I will win because my opponent is psychopath and soon will explode. The Judges are OK in USA in general and I don;t have any problem so far.After I finish my case, if I am OK, I will put my case on youtube . Anybody do not give up, there is legal help on internet, much cheap than Attorney and a lot offices for help.
Are you still in litigation? I tell everybody, to write down the laws and documents to force judgement, which is when the judge has to make a ruling based on what you want even if they don't like you or agree. You could probably research it somewhere, but I like to use www.youwontlose.com because it has every step clearly with the forms and laws for forcing the judge to rule on your behalf in any case. I personally think it's the best one-stop-shop resource for representing self because each law and motion is for tying up the opponent and forcing the court to rule based on the law whether they like it or not. And please keep us posted.
@@RSmith1982 cannot connect to site you referenced. Do you know another address for that site. Needing to chat about a case set up to trap me. Been whistle blower and a witness who can identify Village thieVES. Police use courts to put witnesses in psych units. Police protecting thieves and this is their 3rd go at me. Unbelievable. All true. Small towns can hide a lot. Last Village Administrator had 7 seven felonies, most related to theft. In 2015, 60 thefts w witnesses and prints in 60 months not investgated over a 7 month period. Closed investigation into my theft day after made report. Police Captain then told Dispatch to flag me as mentally ill and armed and dangerous. No history of any. Bad boys. I am not safe.
I believe u, I am fighting corruption of democrats human trafficking Ppl with intellectual/developmental disabilities, the elderly AND children because of the bonus bill the Clinton's signed. God Bless you and your stand
I have tons of United States codes if anyone needs them, I will give them to u free of charge and I have bunches of other stuff I calculate and other awesome videos on You tube under legal and law so feel free to visit my channel. God Bless y'all. We are in The End. Repent. Be Baptized, make Disciples
I am a lawyer from Middle East . I have a custody battle in Illinois and I had so far four lawyers draining me in the court more than $300,000 and they lied on me and I gave them too much evidence but they didn’t use it and most of them they did stipulation without my permission. Lawyers these days are lairs just money language. No morals . And I still believe that still there few lawyers honest . But thank you so much for this video . Now I either represent my self or look for honest lawyer which is quite difficult
I'm in California going thru a divorce. This man has said everything that has happened to me. I originally had a Lawer, charged me $4000. This guy was bad, very poor representation. Heck , I talked more in court more than he did. He left the case while it was still on going. I now represent myself, I also filed a complaint with the state bar against him and opposing counsel. It is a club, the Judge cant stand me, he hates the fact I'm representing myself. He wont allow me to talk in court. Has shut me down dozens of times (will file a complaint against him also) this case has lasted almost 3 years. The Judge even stated "Well, at least your saving money on Attorney fees". The complaints against the Lawyers was denied. I'm going back to court soon, and going to ride it out. I wouldn't advise what I'm doing to anyone else. But am saving money like the Judge said.
Thank you sooo much for this! I wasn't going to go up against the Law Firms for my rights! Now I KNOW I'm doing something right! I'm going to do as much as I can to win and more importantly learn! Lawyers WATCH OUT!!! I'm coming for my Freedom!
Still learning and fighting- down to 1 civil action, im the Lien Creditor in this suit and im coincidentally in the final stages of bringing the claim to the court for a Summary Judgement-
He doesn't want you to know you need to become a secured party, creditor and stop all this US citizen nonsense and become the American national that we all are so we can handle our own legal matters. This guy's an agent for Satan or the bar as it's commonly known here
Love it. The only thing you must do especially when writing pleadings, don’t use scandalous words but you can attack based on available evidence and truth you have. Then when you go before a judge, try at always, be civil don’t interpret while the other party talks, no intervention., wait your time speak slowly and avoid emotions, it is easy folks, lawyers gut money especially on civil rights and injury cases for nothing, research, know the law, have evidence backed with facts on your side, my brother you make it.
I agree. It's worth the gamble to get them to violate basic rights and hold them under 18 USC 241 and 242. If the court violates the Constitution for profit hold them under 18 USC 1951. Their oath is under 5 USC 3331, 3332, and 3333 and violations punishable under 5 USC 1711. Make an Affidavit of truth Criminal Complaint and send it to the FBI and let a Federal Prosecutor be your lawyer. Few judges will answer jurisdiction questions and in a court of record....BINGO! If the case is a traffic ticket where no damage or injury exists those tickets are considered a Bill of Attainder which is illegal under Article I of the legal Constitution and a fraud. Be sure to include in complaint damages legal Constitutional Dollars as at this time a Federal Reserve Note is worth around 14 legal Silver Dollars. The 5th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America determines the legitimate grounds for passing through the portals of the courthouse and for using the tax financed court. All processes in Commerce are legislated, judicated (adjudicated), executed, challenged, rebutted, and consummated by the parties in Commerce within the realm of Economics, labor, contracts, surety, credit, liens, distresses and honorable combat by reason-all without the Courts. Only those processes belong in the tax-financed court which will not be resolved without libel, slander, violence, and dueling, human sacrifice through mortal combat, double jeopardy, self destruction, adverse possession or eminent domain. The first four Amendments (1-4) of the Bill of Rights keep Commerce on the streets, outside of the courts and out of the public tax coffers. The Fourth Amendment protects the public from a government, which takes from Citizens by bearing false witness. The Fifth Amendment is intended to keep the courthouse doors closed against the capricious and unlawful use of public tax money, and, for example, prohibits and outlaws the private use of its facilities by an organized labor union known as the Bar Association. The Sixth Amendment provides a method of maintaining the commercial continuity of the nation while at the same time it prevents the government from converting the courthouse into a profitable commercial enterprise, a witch hunting institution, a public slaughterhouse, and a political genocide institution. The Eighth Amendment forbids government to terrorize the public to assert government’s will. It demands that the punishment of crimes be proportional to the degree of public offense. It is well known that all governments rule by force, that power corrupts, and that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Therefore the Eighth Amendment is provided and serves to limit the expansion of corruption. The Ninth Amendment allows the Citizen to create a remedy by Affidavit. The Tenth Amendment empowers the same Citizen to exercise an un-rebutted choice of remedy.
*t There is no video Phillip. The Constitutional lawyer Stephen Pidgeon et al produced criminal charges vs barack and co in an effort to stop the general election in 2012 as barack is not a natural born citizen and a vast fraud was being perpetrated upon the American public by the Democrat Party. While the original Constitution is short in pages it takes many books defining it. A much bigger fraud was made under the Act of 1871 where a new constitution, the corporate constitution was created by Congress yet never ratified by Convention of States and where the original 1789 Constitution was never dissolved by an Article V Convention of States. Here is that story, presscore.ca/two-constitutions-in-the-united-states-1st-was-illegally-suspended-in-favor-of-a-vatican-crown-corporation-in-1871 The new constitution is illegal yet still had to exist in harmony with the common law. The new constitution left a loophole to create a remedy to exit any contract (bill of attainder mentioned in Article I of the original Constitution) and the remedy is found in UCC 1-207. 207 was so very effective it was moved to UCC 1-308. Lower courts do not recognize these code remedies, but higher courts do. When a name appears in all capital letters in court and we have to sign on a dotted line always sign "UCC 1-308 WITHOUT PREJUDICE" with your name tus reserving your rights, ALL OF THEM as the new corporate constitution is all about violating our rights and held true to 18 USC 241 and 241. When the courts are used to profit the corporation and rights are violated t may also bring in 18 USC 1951 and combined with 241 and 242 those attempting the extortion are looking at up to 31 years in prison. What the criminal charges against barack et al did was insist on the money fines to be paid in real legal Constitutional Dollars, based on Silver. While a Federal Reserve Note is not Constitutional money it can be made into Constitutional money based on Silver. Today it takes around 14 Federal Reserve Notes to make one Constitutional Dollar, so the fines under 18 USC 241 and 242 can be demanded under Constitutional Dollars taking the fine from $250,000 to $7 million Fed Notes and that fine doubles for the corporation behind the court of color which is hell bent on violating uor rights under this faux constitution. Most all crimes are commercial crimes and tried under the color of law in courts of The simple remedy is to state "I do not consent and waive the benefit" as the Information handed Defendants is actually information within a contract for which you, we will never be allowed to see the finest of print. Since it is against contract law to be harassed and coerced into a contract simply never consent and never understand the "charges" as these charges are actually an illegal bill of attainder and by never understanding the charges the court can't go forward legally. Of course they do in the name of commerce. When they violate our rights make a formal Affidavit of Truth and send it to the FBI whose responsibility is to investigate public corruption and the violation of the citizens rights. I have a massive criminal complaint via Affidavit of Truth in a Grand Jury in Oklahoma this month on the Federal level. I'm currently writing a book on all of this.
Holy shit did he just say that" whether you have a lawyer or not" I'm a construction worker who took some time off thanks to Covid-19. My time was spent learning and education my as well as putting together a good strong case in a binder! I preserved all my evidence!! I matched up the many Violation's to its Codes (Civil & Evid) I was doing research like Erin Brockovich I kid you not! What was a big help for me was Casetext & Westlaw! I was able to research other cases ,learn the language, The many Rules & Statues for the state of California. Every ESI was in there in that binder, anyway I told the Attorney (I got shot down by two over the phone) the 3rd was a charm! We talked for 45min my last words were " I'm handing you a case on a silver platter) 2 weeks later a letter went out (Informal Discovery) and the rest is history! What are the 4 elements to trigger the doctrine of "Negligence Per Se"? I'm being very honest, God Honest, I stopped this video 30 seconds in to write this. I'm not even going to finish it! People if you want to see an amazing inspirational video when comes to representing yourself you gotta see NO you must see " I arrested the district attorney " Knowledge is power and nobody can take that away from you!! As for the guy who made this video, I only lasted 30sec , it wasn't for me! Nothing Personal..
Really I have to represent myself sep 6 for a criminal case and I motion the court and they are considering dismissing it but I have to keep pushing the issue
@@apisrael2108 yes sir . See the problem with people in society today is they don't press the issue they just know they're guilty so they go in there and be guilty. I demand to see all evidence show me your burden of proof show me you have the proof. When I start stepping on their own dicks and tripping over their own tongues and you keep pushing push for that jury trial then they usually know that you feel like you have a good case one thing you cannot do is you cannot go in there and tell the court that you want to represent yourself. As soon as you go in there and sign that paper saying that I am going to represent myself you just became a big fat liar. There is no one named myself on the court docket. I see in my case I had them backwards over a barrel for kidnapping extortion and federal fraud and I proved that I had them for these things and there was nothing they could do about it they damn sure didn't want to go to a jury trial when I started threatening to call Washington DC for theft of federal funds and possible money laundering and tax fraud. I was able to prove to the court that they were breaking more laws arresting me for a non-existent law for the sole purpose of creating revenue in other words for stealing money
@@apisrael2108 do not do not tell that court that you are going to represent yourself. You let them know that you are the living whatever your name is like in my case I told them I am the living Shane l Rogers born in the land of Fort Worth Texas. See you when you go into the courtroom and you see the yellow Fringe around the American and whatever state you live in flag that means you're under maritime law which means you're under military naval law. In order for that Court to have jurisdiction over you you would have had to been born at sea or within a hundred miles of the ocean the Gulf of Mexico is not an ocean it is the Gulf of Mexico. Look up the Black's law dictionary that's what the courts go by in America. What you want to do is find a case that was just like yours where the person was found innocent or not guilty because you're going to use that case as your evidence as to why you're not guilty. When you go in there and you print your name do not use all capital letters throughout your name print your name in the proper form the first letter of your first name is capital all the rest are lowercase the first letter of your last name is capital all the rest letters are lowercase. If you look at your driver's license all the letters in your name are capital letters this means you are part of the corporation which means you basically have no say so when you start signing paperwork and they tell you to print and then signature if you print all capitals then you're agreeing that you are part of their corporation that bind you by their contract which means that you have zero rights
@@apisrael2108 and remember also when you look in the Black's law dictionary under whatever your criminal offense is you need to go in there and look at the statutes of limitations because if they drag this thing out for too long then you get you get off on it anyway each case has a statute of limitations which means they have so many amount of days in which they have to try your case before they have to throw it out that's part of due process. Also remember this in America it's one punishment per one crime. So if you were already arrested for this crime and did any amount of time for this crime then they can't keep punishing you for it have to let him know that s*** too .
@@apisrael2108 oh yeah most importantly if they read you your Miranda Rights at the end they ask you if you understand you do not ever understand. It's a trick question because when you when they ask you do you understand that means do you stand under them are you giving them power over you so no matter what you do not understand they will go in circle for hours over that damn deal and you do not break down you do not understand
As your friendly, local, semi-retired attorney who hates litigation, I have seen enough to know that if you are representing yourself, the Magistrate, the Judge, or the Court will usually bend over backwards to make sure you present as much of your side as possible. I have seen Magistrates ask additional questions if the attorney failed to do so; and I have also seen Judges accept "objections" when they were not timely made because he knew the attorney was inexperienced and was not going to let the experienced attorney take advantage of him. I do not like their political agendas but the Legal Aid Societies can also help you find an attorney who will do the work Pro Bono or at a reduced rate. Where there is a Will, there is a Way!
@@borisbadenov651 I am in boiling legal water I have to go against lawyers of bar association, ethical committee The administrative judge compromised her professional integrity. "They" did such a sloppy job justifying unjustifiable that I am nervous If there is a federal judge to their services? And to your "why"... Perhaps, you'll be willing to help me out
@@inessastanisloff5363 It would be quite foolish to conduct such "help" over the internet or in such a forum. YOU WILL HAVE TO DO SOME RESEARCH to find either an attorney or a "boutique law firm" that would be able to help you in YOUR Jurisdiction. It would not be easy to find a local attorney willing to take on the groups you have listed but that always depends upon the "facts" and whether or not it is worth their time and effort. In any event, here are 15 "law organizations" --- some specialize more than others --- that can either help you or help you navigate towards the type of counsel you need: 1. Liberty Counsel lc.org/ 2. Liberty Institute www.libertyinstitute.org/about/faq 3. Pacific Justice Institute www.secure.pacificjustice.org/site/SPageNavigator/contact_us.html 4. Advocates For Faith and Freedom faith-freedom.com/ 5. Alliance Defending Freedom adflegal.org/about-us 6. National Legal Foundation nationallegalfoundation.org/ 7. Thomas More Law Center www.thomasmore.org/ 8. Thomas More Society thomasmoresociety.org/ 9. Christian Legal Society www.christianlegalsociety.org/ 10. American Center for Law and Justice aclj.org/ 11. Center for Law and Religious Freedom www.clsreligiousfreedom.org/about-center 12. Christian Attorneys of America christianattorneysofamerica.com/ 13. Christian Law Association www.christianlaw.org/ 14. National Association of Christian Lawmakers christianlawmakers.com/ 15. Pacific Legal Foundation pacificlegal.org/
Hello to all. This guy has some very very valid points. I support him One Hundred (100) percent (%). It's a club no doubt. I was able to win my case on my own. It was not easy procedurally I was beat the facts were on my side. The police were surprised at my articulate direct questions. The issue is most people can not stay calm and think ahead. I ignored the Crowns jabs and gentle taunts and forced the police and crown to prove it...several day trial to which I won as the allegation(s) could not be proved...I have been told what's more impressive is I get all my firearms back...almost unheard of...lawyers wanted 25,000.00. I met with legal aid which was a joke...I trusted myself more than legal aid and won...hands down...
I filed suit against a self storage facility that locked me out because I was rescuing kittens, with the manager's permission, and then seized my valuables and sold whatever was left over, to the receptionist's father. They abused me for several years and even had me arrested for calling them by phone. I have survived a motion for summary judgement and another motion for dismissal. The trial is next week. I have no idea what to do. I filed in Chancery Court because my mental health required that i find out whose name was on the bogus bill of sale. The judge did this for me, but then wouldn't let me add him to the list of defendants. I am scared. Any suggestions? I didn't ask for an amount, but I think I will ask for 1 million.
I totally agree. It’s unbelievable. I have an attorney that seemed to be on my side and wanted to go to trial. At pretrial he was angry at me for not excepting some plea… can’t trust him they lle through their teeth
I just finished divorce trial three weeks ago I lost my half of my home and I am paying alimony on a business I stopped doing three years ago when I was suffering from Cancer and Chemo.There is no Law it doesnt matter if you have Cancer it doesnt matter if your Wife is divorcing you because she had a boyfriend.The system is designed for the money to go to the lawyers and if you represent yourself you will witness people lying under oath and the reality will be that if you dont give in then you will go to jail for the false accusations placed against you.My only regret on that day was that I had served my country for six years and that the people I swore to protect under oath were the people who robbed me.
Anthony, a Christian WW2 Vet, warned me in the late 70's "in the End Time's, wickedness will abound!" I unwillingly went to Trial, facing her 5th Liar who produced a fraudulent Income Tax Return only showing 12 of 26 Bi-weekly Garnished Support Payments from my Disability Benefits! Her first 3 taXpayer funded Liars all committed fraud and perjury on Sworn and Affirmed Affidavits and Form 13.1 Financial Statements! Hold your head up high, and as much as the losses hurt, remember that "Vengeance is mine saith the Lord" You came into this world naked, and we may have to leave destitute, but with personal honor! Scripture verses are Common Law, and Judge's and Liars squirm when you use it! ISAIAH 5:20 Woe unto them who call good, evil, and evil, good!" I read that to a Judge, and he was retired before a week was over! God will deal with them! Study the precepts of Common Law!
I beat a speeding ticket, and turned a collection suit into a counter claim. It took a lot of time, and wasn’t easy. But after hearing the cop tell me he never lost a case, ever, and hearing the debt collector moan as I demanded the money I sure would try again!
I represented myself 20 years ago because I charged with assaulting 5 police officers and disorderly conduct. All charges dropped, if I was smarter at the time and know what I do today I would filed a claim in civil court. BP. 2024AD.
First, You should not through your and others like you, opinions on other people. I have won in court representing myself FOUR times and WON each time! Listen t these people. They entered the court room and did not DO THEIR HOMEWORK!!!Every time I tried to use a Lawyer I had to fire all of them for misrepresentation EACH TIME! You have to first BELIEVE IN YOURSELF!! SECONDLY, you have to do your homework!!! Go sit in on civil cases. Sit in on ones represented by the legal field and ones not represented by the legal field. YOU ARE YOUR OWN WORSE ENEMY w/ your self-defeating attitude!!. Remember there is someone higher than the courts watching over you and all you have to do is ask.
I agree with your advice to a certain degree, you shouldn't take the outcomes of other ppls cases as a guarantee that yours will end in the same way, thinking it hopeless. I would hope doing enough research and knowing your shit pretty thoroughly would be enough to arm yourself with all you need to defend yourself in court. But on the other hand, how realistic is it to sit in on court cases and prepare by doing the "homework" required in order to achieve that end in a criminal court case for instance, where you've been charged with a felony outta left field? You're getting booked, processed and then housed until you go to court. Where's there time for homework in that kinda scenario? I've been to jail more times than I care to admit and, although I did commit some pretty reckless thefts and burglaries, I saw enough court cases in custody that I can assure you 100% that justice is not what the players are after. They're after all that they can get from anyone who sets foot on their field from the public sector. One thing I observed at least a half dozen times, something I found very odd and suspicious, was the courts, judges, DAs, lawyers, tended to show sort of an intentional ignorance, you could say, when it came to child molestation cases, and leniency towards the accused suspects. Too many times. I watched one man in custody next to me, supposedly still innocent as he had not yet been convicted of anything, be scarred and intimidated into taking a plea with shoddy evidence against him for fear of losing and getting worse penalties, and then watch a man accused of a violent molestation case be Treated almost as though he hadn't done anything nearly as heinous, bail granted, or reduced to some petty misdemeanor with a very short leash. And next, what's this? Caught with drug periphernalia and dope? Bail denied, 1st offer 2 yrs with half... then next, found naked with a little girl who was his neighbors child? Bail set at 5k or the fuckers werent even in custody yet, then issued another court date for later down the road. Also seen a man get 3 yrs with half time for beating the shit outta some old man who had sex with his 11 yr old niece. It was rape actually, like his niece testified, but was dropped down to some lude and lascivious act with a child BS, which was hardly even noticed cuz they were too hell bent on demonizing the guy who beat the shit outta the pervert. Call me crazy, but I sensed some favoritism towards sickos.
@@dgushardy1 Here's a 7-min video that can show you who is the "someone higher than the courts watching over you" that @Save Berth is referring to: ruclips.net/video/WDEBz25lGdY/видео.html Also, he's right, we've had that same success in the courts without a lawyer. Also, start with these videos to understand what the real battle is: ruclips.net/video/SWF1EqUZBbc/видео.html ruclips.net/video/BQmoiPVURLA/видео.html
@@colehanson2033 I'm now one of the innocent and yes someone assaulted me and strangled me 2011 and took me to Trial from jail and said I broke the orbits of my eyes myself. Interesting I think I won he got a whole extra year in jail for strangling me. Hmm. My son got 6 months for not paying child support. Doesn't add up! Doesn't Sorry oh in case it matters which I wish it didn't I'm a White 59 year old grandma. Ugh
Yes - fight for your rights Wilson - but know that if you self-represent the statistics say you have about a 2% chance of winning. Such is the prejudice of courts and the legal profession against persons who do not hire a lawyer. Good luck, and God Bless. Donald
These cases are when NOT to represent yourself, I would only do it in criminal cases and I have grown up in the system. I've been in over 20 bar brawls and loads of charges, had a lot of cases related to assaults and weapons, all have been pleaded down to seem like I'm not that bad of a guy, which I'm not, I beat up bullies. Always have, always will. So, remember You have to play to the "club's" hand... I plea down charges to appease their need to win, the thing to realize is they need to keep their jobs, if criminals stop doing crime, they are out of a job. DO NOT FORGET THAT!!! I have heard that from multiple people in the Justice system. In a criminal proceeding the Public Defender is basically railroading you into a substantial charge so that they can all collect a paycheck from your situation, it may seem like a good deal but usually they are just offering you some chicken scratch. The kicker is that if you represent yourself, you have a lot better hand due to this one fact and statement... (and I've threatened DA's with this before) "We can come to a fair conclusion in this matter or... I can drag the trial out as long as possible and demand a retrial for inadequate representation, meaning myself... It is a legal loophole that they will all hate, because it ties up their docket and lowers their clearance numbers and rates and they cannot legally stop you from doing this. You will be granted a Re-Trial." THIS IS YOU LOOSING GRACEFULLY!!! YOU WILL NOT WIN ANY CRIMINAL COURT CASE WITHOUT A HIGH PRICED LAWYER OR TRULY DEDICATED PUBLIC DEFENDER. Remember, in a court of law the testimony of a Peace Officer is entered in as FACT! DO NOT MESS AROUND.
So your saying if your getting a crappy pd n he's not representing you right , or offering a decent plea to fire him n go pro se? I got a case coming up for pretrial
I have no idea what case(s) you went to court for. However, I went back on a criminal case which if not I would have lost 20 years over a minor drug case when I was in my early twenties. I not only appealed my case twice and won; but also had my entire sentence vacated. I did become a paralegal in College (prison) and since my release 20 plus years ago I have won traffic tickets as well as helped many others. If you are intelligent and have a real desire or must to win you will learn all the court procedures and bylaws. If you can draw up a motion with supporting case-law you have a good shot at a fair shake. I agree they are all in the same club but ALWAYS REMEMBER THE RECORD IS YOUR FRIEND.
OF COURSE IM NOT A MEMBER OF THE BARR ASOCIATION. I ASSOCIATE WITH THE CONSTITUTION AND. CONSTITUTION IS AN IRON CLAD CONTRACT ENFORCEABLE IN THE COURT OF LAW.
Uh every state is a Corporation. We are dead in common law yet it doesn't matter they make it up as they go in favor of money and jail is money. Either way im In an entrapment. What to do?
The basic mistakes people who represent themselves make is not looking at the court docket before hand, being sworn in and asking for a court reporter. Don't answer any questions until all that is done otherwise you have no chance.
Imagine this guy giving weight loss advice to an overweight person... " you think you can lose weight you're wrong, it's hard, most can't and what makes you think you can". "Those buff guys in the gym all have special tricks that you don't have" "The food industry is rigged against you to keep you fat, and you can't do anything about it" "You think you can learn enough to lose weight, haha you can't" "Just give up and stay fat and live a happy life"... This guy is a clown, a fear mongerer.
I want you to know that I am suing a few individuals in Vermont... the court staff have been very kind with me and even some judges! It's like a game of chess, you have to be ahead of your opponent 10 moves. I even recused a few judges and those recusals were granted so I am doing something great and I am winning.
Are you pursuing them via 42 USC 1983, tort claim, state statute? Just curious. I live in Vermont and am preparing to move forward pro se on litigation seeking damages.
A disgruntled advocate said...you have a good lawyer...I replied God is my lawyer....hopefully if you have your facts and tell the truth justice will prevail
I see a lot of positive thinkers here and I'm glad to see it. One small piece of advice please. Inform your friends your family and anybody else you can and educate them on jury nullification? That is a great weapon in court. look under corporate laws. That's what you're dealing with when you walk into courts . look up the difference between Article 1 and article 3 courts. . Demand the court of republic. Which is under common law? Ask them to prove jurisdiction and their laws. Understand 4 d courts, no due process, child support and CPS are totally illegal........gby all
The fact that they don’t give any examples of what happens in court and how they were attacked/ambushed is what makes this unbelievable to me. This video seems to be a scare tactic to me. I could be wrong but that is what my gut is telling me.
Hello Peter. I understand and welcome your scepticism. If only the general public would question everything as you do, the world would be a better place. I invite you to carefully consider all the evidence at my website - DonaldBest.CA and I do mean carefully consider all the evidence. You might also want to consider that two days ago I was honoured with the Ontario Civill Liberties award. This honour was a huge surprise to me. We can change things if we apply ourselves. ocla.ca/ocla-civil-liberties-award/
Lawyers are sacred of everyone representing themselves @ court... why????? cause their Money maker ends... No one should pay an attorney to speak for them... educate yourself and you could be your own attorney and represent documents w/facts on your own to the court system. If more people step up to these Club members... The court system decisions/rulings will get fixed.
This guy's full of it. I represented myself on a traffic violation once. I treated everybody respectfully they treated me respectfully. I issued subpoenas, cross examined witnesses and gave testimony. Even though I lost the judge commended me on how decent and respectful I was. I paid the one hundred dollar fine.
Say "non-lawyers," not "ordinary people." "Ordinary people" plays into the legal business prejudice that they are superior. They're not; they just like to pretend they are.
I notice that the commenters below are split between agree and disagree with this man's viewpoint. I think it depends a lot on how corrupt the judiciary is in your local area. Everything he said is true in the Caribbean courts. They don't even follow their own rules half the time. Canada is a lot different. I found the judges there to be quite helpful to self represented parties. I've had the experience of proving my point in court in a civil case for a noise nuisance only to be told by the magistrate that I should refile the action as a private prosecution. Heads you lose, tails you can't win. All the same, I think people who have a good basic education should take the initiative to educate themselves on court procedure and etiquette and try to become independently proficient. If you flunked out of school you are definitely screwed whichever way you go. Time and time again I have found that lawyers put very little time and effort into your case. They get paid whether you win or lose and I think that is a fundamentally massive problem with the system that we have today. There are lots of great uploads on RUclips but it does take up a lot of time to absorb it all. The rule books and the statutes are complex and endless. All I can say is if you persevere and you can get in front of an honest judge you do have a chance to succeed.
Hi Sysprog999 - Everything I said is about the Canadian courts - although it sure applies throughout the USA and the Caribbean too. Ontario, Canada is where a judge convicted me in absentia (while I wasn't in court) of contempt of court in a civil case during a hearing that I was unaware of and hadn't been notified of. To obtain my conviction, three lawyers falsely told the judge (in writing and orally) that I had informed them during a phone call that I had received a certain court order. This was false as I had several times during the call denied receiving the court order and asked that it be sent to me. When I returned to Canada with voice recordings of the call that showed the lawyers perjured themselves to obtain my conviction, the court refused to allow new evidence in the case. The corrupt judge did this to protect the lawyers who are fellow members of 'the Club'. Over 100 lawyers refused to represent me when I returned to Canada because they did not wish to incur the wrath of the legal profession for turning on the corrupt lawyers. I was therefore forced to represent myself before the corrupt judge and the opposing corrupt lawyers. You can read my full story at my website: donaldbest.ca/faqs-about-best-v-ranking/ Cheers and thanks for taking an interest. Donald
Hi Donald. You got screwed. What they did was "fraud on the court". You should look into the mechanics of an action for fraud on the court. One of the aspects of such an action is that it can be done at any time in any court and by its very nature you would be able to present your evidence. You need a tough honest lawyer who will work on contingency ( no win - no pay) for a percentage cut of the damages you should be getting from those lawyers who screwed you over.
Hi Sysprog999. Yes, it was a fraud on the courts, and I do have a tough and competent lawyer. So here's how it all played out... I returned to Canada and the corrupt judge refused to consider my 'fresh evidence' - the recordings that prove the lawyers lied about several things that were foundational in my conviction. So... the judge threw me in prison for 3 months. When some friends approached defense lawyer Paul Slansky and showed him the evidence, he came on board immediately and had me sprung on bail to appeal. But the Court of Appeal would not let me appeal unless I paid several hundred thousand dollars in court costs already assessed against me on the basis of the false evidence. I didn't have that kind of money so I went back to prison to complete my sentence. I was not even allowed to cross-examine the lawyers and other witnesses that the courts relied upon to convict and imprison me. I was not allowed to cross-examine the corrupt Ontario Provincial Police officer, Jim Van Allen, who worked illegally for the lawyers as an unlicensed private investigator, and whose ‘expert’ evidence was also used to convict and sentence me. To this day, no court has listened to the forensically certified voice recordings of my telephone call with the lawyers that prove the lawyers lied to the court to convict and imprison me. That is wholesale corruption where each court and judge tossed out the rule of law to protect the corrupt lawyers and judge who started the series of events. My website has the details and the evidence that allows anyone to listen to the voice recordings, examine all the evidence and to judge for themselves. Here's a summary: donaldbest.ca/faqs-about-best-v-ranking/
@@donaldbest1295 Woah! Don't we live in the land of the wicked! I'm glad I found your Story! I Filed 4 an Appeal in Toronto, over corruption in Family Court, but didn't carry through, as it was to onerous! I see now it would have been a waste of time! Donald, have you added to your Website with any updates? Have you seen the Article in the Toronto Star, "the Two Faces of Justice" about the LSUC and its terrible record on disciplinary action against it's members!
He's in Canada "Donald Best is an Access to Justice and Anti-corruption advocate. A former Toronto Police Sergeant (Detective), he spent years in deep-cover investigations against organized crime, corrupt police and public officials. In 2010 while traveling abroad from Canada, he was convicted of Civil Contempt of Court in a civil case costs hearing he did not know was taking place. He was convicted in his absence on the provably false testimony of several senior lawyers and spent 63 days in prison - all in solitary confinement. The courts refused to listen to Mr. Best's voice recordings that prove his innocence and the lawyers' perjury - but you can listen to the secretly made recordings here, and watch other videos by Donald Best."
At 4:34-35 the chick says the rules and they’re not written out anywhere. ....... Wrong!!! The rules of civil procedure are easily accessible and State Civil procedure is modeled after the Federal Rules. Also every state has criminal procedural rules codified in its statutes and every court publishes it’s own local rules and they are pretty straight forward.
Thanks for your encouraging video, thanks for wasting our time with your nagging arguments. But will not break the will of those with a bold spirit and a lil wisdom . . here's the thing . . you don't fight them in their field (Statutes, Ordinances, Regulations) you fight them with your weapons (Private Rights, God-Given Rights, Constitution, International Human Rights etc) . . you throw their jurisdiction to the ground and they cannot win, you expose their scams
I represented myself as a defendent in a criminal jury trial. The system can be against you. But by learning the details you can use the system to your advantage. I appeared 22 times for this trial. Many times the judgeband prosecutor called me aside and offered me a deal. I wouldnt take it. I also didnt wave my right to a speecy trial, something almost every defense attorney will do. I even got the judge to say of the prime witness "No, he has proved she is a liar, so he can ask her if she was lying then or now". The jury came back in 10 minutes and found me not guilty.
WHAT he is saying is partially true, however the legal symbol is a two side scale meaning there IS injustice and there IS justice. You will ONLY be abused if you don't fight back and learn the law and your constitutional rights. When representing yourself the judge and lawyers assume you are uneducated in law, however once you demonstrate otherwise the tide WILL turn. Furthermore evidence is key so if you can prove bias, misconduct, you have a case to present to the bar association and file a grievance against the opposing parties. I've been learning as I go and it's powerful and I must say hard work and now I'm encouraged to get my law degree at 36! it's NEVER too late hay lol😉
It's a great idea to go to court if needed...... I represented myself through my hearings and everything went great everything went well but I also put so much time into learning the system and doing it right I spoke up for myself and I got what I wanted but if somebody is really weak and really scared then they need a lawyer or they need to walk away
@@latonyakyle5550 Thank you L@tonya. That means the world to me. I dedicate this song from Prince to you called, "Some Where Here On Earth" Also "Rainbow " from Morris Day; A Tribute to The Purple One; Enjoy Latonya, you have a Wonderful name,& took a Beautiful picture. Let me know of the songs when you get a chance ok? I'm new at this you Tube stuff, and typing folks. Eye get a thrill when someone Response back. Even if they say. Yo Bro go slap yurself😅
14. When Justice Rosenberg considered the question of whether the Applicant had sufficient means to appoint counsel, he noted that based on the findings of Nordheimer J. (on the original Rowbotham application), the Applicant was not without means to fund counsel. However, having first concluded that the Applicant had not met the “merits” test to justify the appointment of counsel, this finding was arguably obiter. Additionally, in any event, to the extent that there is an arguable basis to challenge Justice Nordheimer’s dismissal of the Rowbotham application with the benefit of additional materials and/or arguments that Justice Rosenberg did not have at the time of the original s.684 application, it would be circular to rely on that ruling as a basis for concluding that the Applicant has means to retain counsel. 15. Additionally, whatever the Applicant’s financial circumstances at the time of Justice Nordheimer’s order, he is in no position to fund counsel. In fact, to the extent that the Applicant has any money available to him to fund counsel, but were frozen by the courts and taken away by bad lawyers before the due process and court prove him guilty which could be not used to defend his constitutional rights, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is respectfully submitted that, if the Applicant otherwise satisfies the court that his appeal has merit (including appealing the Rowbotham decision) and that the Applicant requires the benefit of counsel to be able to effectively advance his appeal, the means test has been satisfied. (2) Merits of the proposed appeal based on the supplemental record or supplemental arguments not before Rosenberg J.A. 16. It is respectfully submitted that the Applicant’s appeal against conviction and sentence is not frivolous. Although the appeal will be a difficult one for the Applicant, the following grounds of appeal have some merit1: (a) Nordheimer J. erred in refusing to appoint counsel for the Applicant pursuant to his R. v. Rowbotham application; (b) The evidence of the Crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigator as opposed to an “independent”; (c) The trial judge erred in finding that this was an appropriate case for a fine in lieu of forfeiture given the purpose of such an Order (ie. to deprive fraudsters of their unlawful personal gain);
I watched this video before I started pro se, and I have to agree with some. However I’ve dealt with lawyers and we just don’t get along because most of them are dishonest and indeed in the good ole boys club. I have gotten much better results being pro se, I just stick with the truth and eventually it over rules the lie , you have to have patience because like he said they will overwhelm you and try to force you to tap out.
@@charlescoon6907 been there done that and they just don’t honor it. However right now today I still file pro se because those are their rules unfortunately.
All of the court rules are readily available online and can easily be studied and practiced. I represented myself during three criminal proceedings that we're all dismissed.
Sounds a bit like the confusion Im going through now. Sued a developer in small claims and now putting together my binders. Told that I must put it all in tabs in a binder. So, my document is 300 pages of my story and exhibits, how do you get that down to the 32 tabs that are only sold? How does that even make it more organized. So instead pay $500 on multiple binders, dividers, paper etc to have the judge ask why you split it all up.
All one has to do is challenge the standing and jurisdiction of the plaintiff and invoke the laws of the Republic, ask the court to have the plaintiff/ prosecutor ceritfy Your right to subrogation!!!
I wish someone would’ve told me this last week, the judge wouldn’t listen to anything I said she only listened to my abusive husband because he had a lawyer.
I hired lawyers and still lost as the Petitioner AND had to pay the other parties attorney fees. I filed a timely notice of appeal in the trial court and paid the filing fee and 13 days later the trial court judge dismissed my notice sua sponte with no motion, no hearing, no nothing.
5. The Applicant filed an inmate notice of appeal against his conviction and sentence received by the court on March 1, 2013. He applied for legal aid to fund his appeal but was refused. He has exhausted all appeals from that decision. 6. On June 12, 2013 the Applicant brought an application before Mr. Justice MacPherson for bail pending appeal. He made submissions without wanting the assistance of duty counsel. Ultimately, Justice MacPherson concluded that, on the basis of the material before the Court at that time, the Applicant had failed to satisfy the Court that his appeal had any merit. 7. On February 21, 2014, Mr. Justice Rosenberg (having been designated by the Chief Justice) heard the applicant’s application for a direction to review Justice MacPherson’s order of June 12, 2013. Justice Rosenberg considered the Applicant’s application and found that there was no basis to review Justice Macpherson’s finding that the appeal had no merit. He noted at paragraph 2 of his endorsement that “I have reviewed the materials especially those related to the Rowbotham motion and the charge to the jury. I can see no basis for coming to a different conclusion that Nordheimer J. for refusing the Rowbotham motion as set out in his ruling of September 29, 2011. He may have underestimated the sentence the appellant was likely to receive, but in all other respects his reasons justify the order made. The Applicant also sought the appointment of counsel pursuant to s.684(1) of the Criminal Code. The Court rejected the application finding that there was insufficient merit to warrant appointing counsel and that, additionally, based upon the findings by Nordheimer J. the Applicant was “not without means to fund his legal proceedings.” 8. On April 9, 2014, the Applicant’s appeal was scheduled for hearing on the inmate appeal list in Kingston, Ontario. The Applicant appeared. Duty Counsel also appeared. Duty counsel identified two potential areas of appeal for the Applicant in relation to the expert forensic accounting evidence adduced at trial and a sentence appeal. The Applicant submitted that there were additional materials relevant to the Rowbotham application that should also be produced so that he could revisit the s.684 application and because it was relevant to an appeal of the Rowbotham application. The Court ordered the Crown to produce further materials and asked duty counsel to review the material and, also, to assist the Applicant in revisiting the s.684 application if the circumstances warranted. With that direction, duty counsel offers the following analysis.
Nope... I'm an ex-cop who went to prison because provably corrupt lawyers and judges protected members of The Club. I've since been publicly vindicated, but law and the courts remain a racket. My story: donaldbest.ca/faqs-about-best-v-ranking/
The people that I know of that had the most success in court were people that represented yourself. If you wish to represent yourself then learn about Trust law.
There is no court of justice, son; only a court of 'law'. Need to appear by 'special visitation' as your ALL CAPS name is a Cestui Que Vie Trust straw man. A natural, living sentiment man is NOT your name in ALL CAPS. Implied concent is where they get you. Always say out loud "I do not understand (stand under their statute) and I do not concent'.
Awesome Truth...I was told by a lawyer that 99% of the people going to the landlord/tenant tribunal represent themselves, I Replied, "Yes but less than 1% of self representated tenants win...!"...
Sir you should not tell people not to represent themselves in court. If we do not stand up to those criminals then nothing will change.people can do whatever they set their mind to..I DO NOT LOOSE IN COURT BECAUSE I KNOW THE LAWS..I HAVE NEVER LOST IN COURT AND DONT PLAN too. People need to do this more.fight for our rights do not roll over .being negative only makes people dout. Themselves.and that's not cool..encourage and build up not DOWN YOU CAN ROCK IN COURT. BECAUSE if you do not try to make a change it won't happen.its easy to win in court! They work for me...
Hi Sue. I understand your perspective, and as I make clear in the video - sometimes you can't walk away and are forced to represent yourself. You can't afford a lawyer, or (as in my case) none have the courage or integrity to take your case, but the stakes are so high that you must pro se. In 2022 in urban US and Canadian family and civil courts, as high as 80% of the citizens are forced to represent themselves. Yet only 3% to 5% of self-reps win in civil court. That's not a justice system - that's a profitable law-union protected business. My caution to all remains though... self-representing yourself in court is far more difficult and dangerous than most people know. Only after they get into the system do they realize that the process is used as punishment, and that the justice systems are so heavily weighted against self-reps. As George Carlin used to say.... "It's a club, and you ain't in it!"
Are you telling me to roll over and pay or not to listen to this guy I'm confused.. if you know how to hold them accountable that mean you've learned a game and you should have went to law school to be one of them you took your life in time to prove a point when you could have paid someone who went to school for that that's all he said you should walk away if you not part or pay for part of the crew to represent you
I only had to represent myself in court once. It was over a minor plate violation so it wasn't that serious. I was easily able to prove was my local DMV's error. Let's back up a bit. I learned the hard way that my renewal tag didn't match my plates during a traffic stop. After getting a citation over my plates & giving myself a night to cool off ( I was reasonably angry) I went to my local DMV & asked a lot of questions. Turns out because my sister had me co-sign for her loan, my name was on her title. I found out we both owned cars from the same manufacturer & year so when they sold me my tags the clerk accidentally clicked on the wrong vehicle as they both show up next to each other in there system looking identical. Turns out it was an honest mistake on there part. I had to pay again to get the tags fixed (probably should of pushed for a refund on the bad tags if that was even an option. At least I was able to settle that with my sister when I told her what happened) I wasn't certain what my legal options where so I got the advice of a lawyer. They told me that I was best representing myself as it was a minor citation & his fees greatly exceeded the amount of the fine. As I could prove these facts with bank records because I had written checks for both transactions (that they oddly didn't even care to look at) I managed to get the fine reduced ( I only saved $15 off a $115 fine so I didn't save much). I keep thinking that if it wasn't the government that screwed up & instead a store I'd have better options. The store I work for offers refunds on bad products & there are laws agents entrapment & extortion that are supposed to protect consumers from these kinds of issues. However, I learned that if the organization is the government they get to play by different rules then the rest of us. I considered suing my local DMV for damages but after speaking to a lawyer it appeared to be not worth the effort. I'd likely be paying $500 in fees just to get a $100 settlement (my fine amount) at best. Also if I'm paying court costs, is the government really getting punished if I am going after government? The whole mess feels a lot like extortion to me. It may not be enough to satisfy me but I decided to never set foot in that specific DMV ever again as I feel a need to hold them accountable somehow. I have also noticed that I now hold a more negative view of my local government after this experience & it has had an effect on how I vote on local issues. Recently, I voted to deny the police tax $ to build a new facility they wanted. I figure if they want to build that, they can use the $100 I already gave them on that. I don't care if it's not enough.
The law is simple, it is statutes, rules, procedures that make it difficult. None of these are law. The law is the constitution and the sheriff is the highest constitutional officer in the land who works for the people and is elected by the people. The sheriffs office also has a duty to act when presented with unconditional issues. Use the constitution and trust law I feel is the way to go. Finally, pay very close attention to the state BAR rules of scope of practice. BAR attorneys are bound and limited by these in your state. I’m not an attorney, I do not practice law, seek an attorney for legal (and not necessarily lawful) advice.
Just yesterday I self-represented again as a Defendant in Family Court. The last few experiences of how the Judge treated me during proceedings, ignored my evidence, assumed that I was dishonest in all my sworn testimony, was crushing to me as a person. How court this "moral authority" conclude that I was a bad actor, let alone render extremely unfair decisions that cost me almost everything financially and in the relationship with my children. Yesterday, I thought I had improved in every single way. I was confident the Judge would not even hear the matter as it defied all the evidence, which was documentary, and the law was crystal clear. But it happened again. Opposing counsel was allowed to make wild accusations and misrepresent facts and yet the Judge only interrupted her to ask her about how much she was seeking in costs and whether she thought she was entitled to double costs. In contrast, I was interrupted by the Judge every few sentences and challenged. I quoted Opposing counsel a few times and each time the Judge came to her defense claiming that the lawyer didn't actually say that, and offered excuses for the lawyer. When I stated that I was seeking costs the Judge flat out stated that I was not entitled to costs as I didn't incur legal fees. The matter will be ruled on next week but I went in convinced that the matter would not even need to be heard, and left thinking that I'm going to lose with double costs charged to me.
A recent study concluded that many trial lawyers as well as business lawyers suffer from psychopathic personality disorder. Most of the judges I have dealt with in my life fit the bill for psychopathy. Don't take it personally. They really have no higher feelings or conscience.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
I've represented myself in court in 15 different actions, and I won 12 of them! It cost me next to nothing and cost the other guy enough to buy a house. I love it! Attorneys want you to believe you can't, or shouldn't, represent yourself in court. One reason they do this is obvious, they don't want the competition and loss of income. The other reason is they want you to believe civil court is some king of mystical palace where the average person will get lost.
Liars are not clever. They leave a whole sloppy mess of evidence. If ur a poor person they waive all the fees and everything else is self explanatory. Self representation is free and trusted representation with God on ur side
Sounds like you should be a lawyer... the average person won't love the legal process.
Deuteronomy 6:12-25
be careful that you do not forget the Lord , who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. Fear the Lord your God, serve him only and take your oaths in his name. Do not follow other gods, the gods of the peoples around you; for the Lord your God, who is among you, is a jealous God and his anger will burn against you, and he will destroy you from the face of the land. Do not put the Lord your God to the test as you did at Massah. Be sure to keep the commands of the Lord your God and the stipulations and decrees he has given you. Do what is right and good in the Lord ’s sight, so that it may go well with you and you may go in and take over the good land the Lord promised on oath to your ancestors, thrusting out all your enemies before you, as the Lord said. In the future, when your son asks you, “What is the meaning of the stipulations, decrees and laws the Lord our God has commanded you?” tell him: “We were slaves of Pharaoh in Egypt, but the Lord brought us out of Egypt with a mighty hand. Before our eyes the Lord sent signs and wonders-great and terrible-on Egypt and Pharaoh and his whole household. But he brought us out from there to bring us in and give us the land he promised on oath to our ancestors. The Lord commanded us to obey all these decrees and to fear the Lord our God, so that we might always prosper and be kept alive, as is the case today. And if we are careful to obey all this law before the Lord our God, as he has commanded us, that will be our righteousness.”
@@Jesusisatthedoor Thanks :)
I suppose it depends on the complexity of the claim.
I can say that I represented myself and I did get abused for not knowing the procedure, but what they didn't expect was my persistence. I lost at trial but on appeal, I convinced the judge to remand the case back to the lower court, where I then won. Defending yourself is absolutely a daunting task, but if you know you are right and you have the fortitude to represent yourself you can absolutely win.
Good for you my friend. In the four years since I created this video there has been some recognition in various courts that self-represented persons should be treated with respect, and that judges must do more to 'assist' ordinary people who are forced to represent themselves. I'll be re-launching this channel in October 2021 and will be able to devote more time to educating both citizens and the legal profession about the realities of self-representation in the courts. Citizens deserve access to justice, but the system is established and operated to favour members of the legal profession - not to bring justice people deserve. Cheers and keep up the good fight.
You can win if the judge is intelligent
You can't win if the judge is corrie
Super great encouragement
cool story bro
Its rocket science i guess 😂
My family ripped me off for over 100 grand when my mom died.Well i have been fighting in court and only have 900 dollars into this fight paying for lawyers.They have 26 000 grand into this fight for lawyers.We going to the jury now and i will be repensenting myself all the way.If i loose in court, they get nothing becuase im judgement free.I own nothing no house.If i win they pay me the 100 grand plus the 60 grand fight me.I will not surrender.Wish me luck im going for it.
Did you win Ted?
So, what happened...
don’t leave us hanging brother
Ted!!! Get back here!!
Ted tell us more please
Philippians 4:13
I can do all this through Christ, who gives me strength.
I prayed to Christ many times but still got beat up. Christ has Yazidi girls getting banged in the ass by ISIS fighters to worry about, and he still can't b bothered to help them, so imagine how he feels about your petty court case...
@@mart9898 Amen
AMEN
Amen
No system can STOP The ALMIGHTY'S HAND! Stand for something or fall for anything!
Stand up for yourself in the American justice system in the courtroom you will fall I'm not saying don't try to do what's right I'm saying this guy is right you can't win walk away
Jeromie Banks People perish for lack of knowledge.
@@Kingdom_Finance People perish from living so give me da knowledge i need.. Help me!help u!help us!
Jeromie Banks Rules of civil procedure. State and Federal Constitutions, etc.
Jeromie Banks What do you need help with?
I represented myself and won. Proved the cop lied on his report. It's all about the evidence and the facts.
Not taking your advice!
This video was a waste of your time.
I can do anything I want.
With God all things are possible. In God we trust!
Robert & Ada Fallon amen!
guilty!
Amen Amen
7 CJS chapter 4. CJS-: corpus juris secundum .
Do any of you people know the difference between common law and admiralty law? Do any of you know the difference between natural rights and civil rights? Has anyone of you done any research to have actual proof to place a FACTUAL opinion vs. listening to people with no facts to back up their opinions that they have been brainwashed with all their lives. I don't believe any of you people can present actual facts in the form of citations written their law books in which their operate from and use against you due to your IGNORANCE evidenced by your unsupported unverified OPINIONS. the courts do not have an American flag which is a flag without a gold fringe with tassels around it. A gold fringed flagcan be found in every courtroom today because they are operating under admiralty maritime law not your common law which is your Bill of Rights as was created from our forefathers and the Declaration of Independence 1776 the unincorporated United States of America hence the states Union will the union of stateswhich is not part of the United States located in the District of Columbia.to make my point clear the United States is located in the District of Columbia it is a federal Corporation and you can read it for yourself under title 28USC 3002 15A.
To further verify my facts, Google UCC 9 - 307 h. Most Americans are asleep at the wheel. All these courtsa private corporations extorting money out of your people through statutes which are not laws they are penal codes and ordinances violations of their private Corporation and all of us have been categorized as their employees.
Are you a FEDERAL CORPORATE EMPLOYEE ?
DO YOU RESIDE IN THE UNITED STATES?
all of you and most Americans do not know and cannot answer this question correctly due to the ignorance and lack of education in-law only. You shouldknow the correct answer to that question if you have researched the two citations the law codes given above. the constitutional United States of America unincorporated under our Declaration of Independence of 1776 is that unincorporated.
The United States is a federal Corporation Department of REVENUE. THEY'RE MAKING MONEY OFF OF YOU WHEN THEY HAVE NO JURISDICTION.
Do any of you people KNOW the difference between an ARTICLE 1 court and an ARTICLE 3 Court?
Article 1 courts are created by congress with limited jurisdiction to only hear cases THAT DEAL WITH COMMERCE. ARTICLE 3 courts are JUDICIAL, COURTS OF RECORD, Supreme Court's. Supreme Court rulings are LAW of the LAND and super seed over statutes which are not laws because you haven't looked up the definition of what is statutes and statutory law in the law dictionaries., Cornell Law is free online but West's can Law, Black's Law and Bouvier's law dictionaries are what the legal system uses for their manipulated definitions of commonly used words that have been manipulated for their own benefit and fool you with this word trickery into their jurisdiction and their control whether in the courtroom or in the streets(Land).
Title 22USC chapter 11
Download the FORM COL,
FOREIGN REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938.
"CREDIT RIVER DECISION".
Oh by the way there is no such thing as LOANS in this country. Lol. FRN's Federal Reserve notes????
Article 9-102 (65) PROMISSORY NOTE definition.
Public Law 73-10
House joint resolution 192 HJR192,
UCC3-104 negotiable INSTRUMENTS
UCC3-402b qualified and unqualified SIGNATURES.
Google and download
- MEMLAW C BANKFRAUD
- " D " ,
IRS PUBLICATION 1212 Pg6 NOMINEE.
1099-OID, 1099-A, 1099-C, FORM 709, 1096, FORM 8281, 1040-V.
ALL OF THESE FORMS WE are supposed to be filing because we use FRN'S and PAY Debts with a DEBT Instrument aka FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES (iou's)(Article 1 section 10 it is unconstitutional to pay a debt using a debt instrument) (Federal Reserve notes are not LAWFUL consideration/Money.why ? They have no silver or gold certificate backing it.FACT!)
WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE FILING THESE irs DOCUMENTS(provided above) TO RETURN THE FUNDS (bookkeeping entries) TO ITS ORIGINAL SOURCE WHICH IS THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER account.
RM10212.001 what is a LEGAL NAME?
RM10205.130 BIRTH NAME.
POMS =PROGRAMS OPERATING MANUAL SYSTEM read it SSA handbook.
> DO you really know what your name and ALL CAPITALS is and refers to?
> Do you know the difference between your LEGAL NAME and your BIRTH NAME? ....
WHAT is the difference between your short version of your BIRTH CERTIFICATE and your long version which is called The vault copy?
TWO BIRTH CERTIFICATES VIDEO on RUclips.
Educate yourselves stop being ignorant to the truth. people that speak out of the side of their mouths have no truth nor fact.
DOWNLOAD THE SUPREME COURT CASE (above)ONLINE FOR FREE AND READ THE DOCUMENT FOR YOURSELF. IF YOU CANNOT QUITE GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS that's some of us are actually telling you the TRUTH then continue on the same path. maybe it's working for you and hopefully for your future family members.
Educate yourselves on AGENDA 21. THESE PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT WANT TO DEPOPULATE SOCIETY AND THE WORLD. I DON'T CARE IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME but I have verified everything I claim and you cannot rebut anything I say as being false, lie, etc.
'Walk away" or pay an attorney, once he drains you financially, to walk away. Honestly, with what attorneys charge hourly, you could pay to put yourself through law school two, if not 3 times over.
You Tube. Is my school, and it's free
Word! I’m representing myself right now. Google is fucking free homie
I have a high pain tolerance so honestly I love that you say I can’t win
what are you in litigation for?
I need you in my life sister 🙏🕺🕺
Honestly though, he is telling the truth. Pro se is incredibly tough... I've had to research and study and write all day for the last 11 months... it's so exasperating... Sooo many rules, laws and technicalities, forms, motions, filings, trips and calls to the Court, notices, deadlines, proof of services, procedures, favoritism/bias, long lines, parking fees, court fees, waiting on hold, continuances, numerous hearings, it's impossible to learn and do them all... if not for the COVID 19 two month extensions and stay at home order I would never have the time or energy to do or learn it all, nor make the deadlines, ... at all... or especially without going insane... I got new bags under my eyes and my head hurts...as I constantly think and study about my old and new arguments all day and night.. this is a LOT! it's crazy... Luckily everything got extended 2 months... Really think about doing this pro se, seriously. It consumes an incredible amount of your time, energy, intellect, joy, peace of mind, sanity and it still will exhaust your money. I probably could have hired a lawyer with all the time, money and mental exhaustion... but sometimes, you just gotta do it, but be mentally prepared. It's not going to be easy, I don't recommend this to anyone.
Winning is in your mind. if you think you will win, you’ll find out how😅😂
@@mauricenickelson9472 I take it it didn't go well. :(
Ignore this guy. Fight for the justice that you deserve.
Strong facts are very persuasive to a judge (even if you completely bumble your way through the proceedings). Go for what you believe in.
No do not believe this guy if you go and represent yourself you will lose judge's tell you to get a lawyer for a reason I've been trying to fight myself and standing up for what's right and have been push down by a bias judge who heard the facts saw the evidence and the defendant admitted to what she was in contempt of the order and the judge denied the contempt the defendant admitted to being in contempt and the judge because I had no representation but myself i was denied my contempt... walk away if you can stand up for yourself but you will lose
@peter collins I had to read what I wrote it was clear you read what transpired -the facts!!!! Don't put me down because of my experience I'm only telling you what happened to me that could happen to you it's a justice system within itself.. is just for some not for all ..if you don't know the rules of it they don't want you to play their game it's called the black book of law it's a dictionary of words that means different in law then in real world speaking.. we not in the club you have to get a lawyer. A judge was once a lawery and D A's are trying to be judges.
@peter collins explanation is I put her in contempt she admitted to being in contempt the judge denied the contempt.. it's a female judge not a male judge
@peter collins well the judge said that she was to follow a court order she didn't follow the court order that is what makes her in contempt she's in contempt of the court order she admitted not abiding by the court order citing that she's in contempt the judge denied it even after seeing the proof dates written evidence you can site all the law you want contempt is when you break an order.. it's willfully breaking a court order CONTEMPT
This guy is a total nut
I did much better representing myself in family "court" than I did with an overpriced attorney. How can they call it a court when Child Support falls under the Executive Branch while courts are supposed to fall under the Judicial Branch? In "Family Court" you are also stripped of your constitutional right to Due Process. Family Court is a Kangaroo Court where nothing is done in the best interest of the child, it's all about the money as the child support agency is a cooperation, not a government agency and its sole purpose is to make money to keep all the family court employees employed and keep their corrupt agency funded. Have you ever noticed that in family "Court" most cases are heard by "Commissioners" rather than Judges??? It's all very corrupt. Unfortunately the USA is not the home of the Free that they taught us about in grade school. Your "Rights" are worth the paper they are written on and can be thrown away any time the "courts" wish.
Money
After I file a complaint AMD intent to sue what's my next step
Ever since I saw the documentary "Divorce Corp" I will say🤝 I won my case representing myself and I am now studying to become a paralegal 🤗
ever since you seen the Divorce Corp documentary you represented yourself and won? That documentary allowed you to win and to study to become a paralegal? Where can I get some of what you're smoking?
Try representing yourself in a criminal case..you already lost once you step foot inside the court.
I love this so much.
I was falsely accused of a felony and I lost my career as a security officer. No lawyer will take on my lawsuit against my accuser. I guess I have no choice but to represent myself.
I’m in a similar boat. Attorneys will only take it if it’s a slam dunk otherwise they won’t waste their time unless you pay them 25k-50k
Gonna be representing myself at court in two days because I'm going through a divorce. I don't have money for a lawyer because I spent most of my money on my previous lawyer. I already know that I'm going to lose, I'm not there to win or gain my wife back even though she has an army with her. All I want is to end this divorce as soon as possible and peacefully. I'm not there to bully or intimidate anyone.
Going through the Same thing here
Same exact thing with me. Want to end this nightmare. I'm horrible at public speaking and I don't know the laws. I need help.
I am in court over 2 years and I will win. I am fighting no only for my rights but for over 20,000 Americans who were
hurt and They don't know. I will win because my opponent is psychopath and soon will explode. The Judges are OK
in USA in general and I don;t have any problem so far.After I finish my case, if I am OK, I will put my case on youtube .
Anybody do not give up, there is legal help on internet, much cheap than Attorney and a lot offices for help.
Are you still in litigation? I tell everybody, to write down the laws and documents to force judgement, which is when the judge has to make a ruling based on what you want even if they don't like you or agree. You could probably research it somewhere, but I like to use www.youwontlose.com because it has every step clearly with the forms and laws for forcing the judge to rule on your behalf in any case. I personally think it's the best one-stop-shop resource for representing self because each law and motion is for tying up the opponent and forcing the court to rule based on the law whether they like it or not.
And please keep us posted.
Sadly not surprised this site is gone. Thanks Google.
@@RSmith1982 cannot connect to site you referenced. Do you know another address for that site. Needing to chat about a case set up to trap me. Been whistle blower and a witness who can identify Village thieVES. Police use courts to put witnesses in psych units. Police protecting thieves and this is their 3rd go at me. Unbelievable. All true. Small towns can hide a lot. Last Village Administrator had 7 seven felonies, most related to theft. In 2015, 60 thefts w witnesses and prints in 60 months not investgated over a 7 month period. Closed investigation into my theft day after made report. Police Captain then told Dispatch to flag me as mentally ill and armed and dangerous. No history of any. Bad boys. I am not safe.
I believe u, I am fighting corruption of democrats human trafficking Ppl with intellectual/developmental disabilities, the elderly AND children because of the bonus bill the Clinton's signed. God Bless you and your stand
I have tons of United States codes if anyone needs them, I will give them to u free of charge and I have bunches of other stuff I calculate and other awesome videos on You tube under legal and law so feel free to visit my channel. God Bless y'all. We are in The End. Repent. Be Baptized, make Disciples
I am a lawyer from Middle East . I have a custody battle in Illinois and I had so far four lawyers draining me in the court more than $300,000 and they lied on me and I gave them too much evidence but they didn’t use it and most of them they did stipulation without my permission. Lawyers these days are lairs just money language. No morals . And I still believe that still there few lawyers honest .
But thank you so much for this video .
Now I either represent my self or look for honest lawyer which is quite difficult
They are like the majority of the population, the good are very few.
Omgoodness so true. Lawyers messed my case up in Alexandria, Virginia. King street NOVA legal Group is some dirt. They work with the police!
Go to Ireland not the UK
🙏🕊️🌌
Money 🔥 is false GinUk
Look to probate/trust to see what they are doing
I'm in California going thru a divorce. This man has said everything that has happened to me. I originally had a Lawer, charged me $4000. This guy was bad, very poor representation. Heck , I talked more in court more than he did. He left the case while it was still on going. I now represent myself, I also filed a complaint with the state bar against him and opposing counsel. It is a club, the Judge cant stand me, he hates the fact I'm representing myself. He wont allow me to talk in court. Has shut me down dozens of times (will file a complaint against him also) this case has lasted almost 3 years. The Judge even stated "Well, at least your saving money on Attorney fees". The complaints against the Lawyers was denied. I'm going back to court soon, and going to ride it out. I wouldn't advise what I'm doing to anyone else. But am saving money like the Judge said.
If you want some advice representing yourself in court, study the rules of the court, don't miss deadlines and research case laws.
yes yes yes. this is exactly what i’ve been learning.
Also: Trial procedures, how to prove dishonesty in a prosecution witness
Pray
🌌🕊️🙏🙂
Thank You so much!! I was looking for something like this!
Thank you sooo much for this! I wasn't going to go up against the Law Firms for my rights! Now I KNOW I'm doing something right! I'm going to do as much as I can to win and more importantly learn! Lawyers WATCH OUT!!! I'm coming for my Freedom!
Hey! What was the result of your endeavor?
Still learning and fighting- down to 1 civil action, im the Lien Creditor in this suit and im coincidentally in the final stages of bringing the claim to the court for a Summary Judgement-
@@808estate2 Keep us updated, please! Best of luck!
He doesn't want you to know you need to become a secured party, creditor and stop all this US citizen nonsense and become the American national that we all are so we can handle our own legal matters. This guy's an agent for Satan or the bar as it's commonly known here
Love it. The only thing you must do especially when writing pleadings, don’t use scandalous words but you can attack based on available evidence and truth you have.
Then when you go before a judge, try at always, be civil don’t interpret while the other party talks, no intervention., wait your time speak slowly and avoid emotions, it is easy folks, lawyers gut money especially on civil rights and injury cases for nothing, research, know the law, have evidence backed with facts on your side, my brother you make it.
This guys definitely one of them. Clearly trying to use a scare tactic
I agree. It's worth the gamble to get them to violate basic rights and hold them under 18 USC 241 and 242. If the court violates the Constitution for profit hold them under 18 USC 1951. Their oath is under 5 USC 3331, 3332, and 3333 and violations punishable under 5 USC 1711. Make an Affidavit of truth Criminal Complaint and send it to the FBI and let a Federal Prosecutor be your lawyer. Few judges will answer jurisdiction questions and in a court of record....BINGO! If the case is a traffic ticket where no damage or injury exists those tickets are considered a Bill of Attainder which is illegal under Article I of the legal Constitution and a fraud. Be sure to include in complaint damages legal Constitutional Dollars as at this time a Federal Reserve Note is worth around 14 legal Silver Dollars.
The 5th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States of America determines the legitimate grounds for passing through the portals of the courthouse and for using the tax financed court. All processes in Commerce are legislated, judicated (adjudicated), executed, challenged, rebutted, and consummated by the parties in Commerce within the realm of Economics, labor, contracts, surety, credit, liens, distresses and honorable combat by reason-all without the Courts. Only those processes belong in the tax-financed court which will not be resolved without libel, slander, violence, and dueling, human sacrifice through mortal combat, double jeopardy, self destruction, adverse possession or eminent domain.
The first four Amendments (1-4) of the Bill of Rights keep Commerce on the streets, outside of the courts and out of the public tax coffers. The Fourth Amendment protects the public from a government, which takes from Citizens by bearing false witness.
The Fifth Amendment is intended to keep the courthouse doors closed against the capricious and unlawful use of public tax money, and, for example, prohibits and outlaws the private use of its facilities by an organized labor union known as the Bar Association.
The Sixth Amendment provides a method of maintaining the commercial continuity of the nation while at the same time it prevents the government from converting the courthouse into a profitable commercial enterprise, a witch hunting institution, a public slaughterhouse, and a political genocide institution.
The Eighth Amendment forbids government to terrorize the public to assert government’s will. It demands that the punishment of crimes be proportional to the degree of public offense. It is well known that all governments rule by force, that power corrupts, and that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Therefore the Eighth Amendment is provided and serves to limit the expansion of corruption.
The Ninth Amendment allows the Citizen to create a remedy by Affidavit.
The Tenth Amendment empowers the same Citizen to exercise an un-rebutted choice of remedy.
Roger Smith could you send me a copy of your comments on the self representation video
*t There is no video Phillip. The Constitutional lawyer Stephen Pidgeon et al produced criminal charges vs barack and co in an effort to stop the general election in 2012 as barack is not a natural born citizen and a vast fraud was being perpetrated upon the American public by the Democrat Party. While the original Constitution is short in pages it takes many books defining it. A much bigger fraud was made under the Act of 1871 where a new constitution, the corporate constitution was created by Congress yet never ratified by Convention of States and where the original 1789 Constitution was never dissolved by an Article V Convention of States. Here is that story, presscore.ca/two-constitutions-in-the-united-states-1st-was-illegally-suspended-in-favor-of-a-vatican-crown-corporation-in-1871
The new constitution is illegal yet still had to exist in harmony with the common law. The new constitution left a loophole to create a remedy to exit any contract (bill of attainder mentioned in Article I of the original Constitution) and the remedy is found in UCC 1-207. 207 was so very effective it was moved to UCC 1-308. Lower courts do not recognize these code remedies, but higher courts do. When a name appears in all capital letters in court and we have to sign on a dotted line always sign "UCC 1-308 WITHOUT PREJUDICE" with your name tus reserving your rights, ALL OF THEM as the new corporate constitution is all about violating our rights and held true to 18 USC 241 and 241. When the courts are used to profit the corporation and rights are violated t may also bring in 18 USC 1951 and combined with 241 and 242 those attempting the extortion are looking at up to 31 years in prison. What the criminal charges against barack et al did was insist on the money fines to be paid in real legal Constitutional Dollars, based on Silver. While a Federal Reserve Note is not Constitutional money it can be made into Constitutional money based on Silver. Today it takes around 14 Federal Reserve Notes to make one Constitutional Dollar, so the fines under 18 USC 241 and 242 can be demanded under Constitutional Dollars taking the fine from $250,000 to $7 million Fed Notes and that fine doubles for the corporation behind the court of color which is hell bent on violating uor rights under this faux constitution. Most all crimes are commercial crimes and tried under the color of law in courts of The simple remedy is to state "I do not consent and waive the benefit" as the Information handed Defendants is actually information within a contract for which you, we will never be allowed to see the finest of print. Since it is against contract law to be harassed and coerced into a contract simply never consent and never understand the "charges" as these charges are actually an illegal bill of attainder and by never understanding the charges the court can't go forward legally. Of course they do in the name of commerce. When they violate our rights make a formal Affidavit of Truth and send it to the FBI whose responsibility is to investigate public corruption and the violation of the citizens rights. I have a massive criminal complaint via Affidavit of Truth in a Grand Jury in Oklahoma this month on the Federal level. I'm currently writing a book on all of this.
Jim Socks i agree he's one of them
Only a FOOL tries to represent themselves.
Holy shit did he just say that" whether you have a lawyer or not" I'm a construction worker who took some time off thanks to Covid-19. My time was spent learning and education my as well as putting together a good strong case in a binder!
I preserved all my evidence!! I matched up the many Violation's to its Codes (Civil & Evid) I was doing research like Erin Brockovich I kid you not!
What was a big help for me was Casetext & Westlaw! I was able to research other cases ,learn the language, The many Rules & Statues for the state of California.
Every ESI was in there in that binder, anyway I told the Attorney (I got shot down by two over the phone) the 3rd was a charm! We talked for 45min my last words were
" I'm handing you a case on a silver platter) 2 weeks later a letter went out (Informal Discovery) and the rest is history!
What are the 4 elements to trigger the doctrine of "Negligence Per Se"?
I'm being very honest, God Honest, I stopped this video 30 seconds in to write this. I'm not even going to finish it!
People if you want to see an amazing inspirational video when comes to representing yourself you
gotta see NO you must see
" I arrested the district attorney " Knowledge is power and nobody can take that away from you!!
As for the guy who made this video, I only lasted 30sec , it wasn't for me!
Nothing Personal..
facts guess I stopped at you! lol
Thanks
I've represented myself twice in court. One criminal one civil. I won both
Really I have to represent myself sep 6 for a criminal case and I motion the court and they are considering dismissing it but I have to keep pushing the issue
@@apisrael2108 yes sir . See the problem with people in society today is they don't press the issue they just know they're guilty so they go in there and be guilty. I demand to see all evidence show me your burden of proof show me you have the proof. When I start stepping on their own dicks and tripping over their own tongues and you keep pushing push for that jury trial then they usually know that you feel like you have a good case one thing you cannot do is you cannot go in there and tell the court that you want to represent yourself. As soon as you go in there and sign that paper saying that I am going to represent myself you just became a big fat liar. There is no one named myself on the court docket. I see in my case I had them backwards over a barrel for kidnapping extortion and federal fraud and I proved that I had them for these things and there was nothing they could do about it they damn sure didn't want to go to a jury trial when I started threatening to call Washington DC for theft of federal funds and possible money laundering and tax fraud. I was able to prove to the court that they were breaking more laws arresting me for a non-existent law for the sole purpose of creating revenue in other words for stealing money
@@apisrael2108 do not do not tell that court that you are going to represent yourself. You let them know that you are the living whatever your name is like in my case I told them I am the living Shane l Rogers born in the land of Fort Worth Texas. See you when you go into the courtroom and you see the yellow Fringe around the American and whatever state you live in flag that means you're under maritime law which means you're under military naval law. In order for that Court to have jurisdiction over you you would have had to been born at sea or within a hundred miles of the ocean the Gulf of Mexico is not an ocean it is the Gulf of Mexico. Look up the Black's law dictionary that's what the courts go by in America. What you want to do is find a case that was just like yours where the person was found innocent or not guilty because you're going to use that case as your evidence as to why you're not guilty. When you go in there and you print your name do not use all capital letters throughout your name print your name in the proper form the first letter of your first name is capital all the rest are lowercase the first letter of your last name is capital all the rest letters are lowercase. If you look at your driver's license all the letters in your name are capital letters this means you are part of the corporation which means you basically have no say so when you start signing paperwork and they tell you to print and then signature if you print all capitals then you're agreeing that you are part of their corporation that bind you by their contract which means that you have zero rights
@@apisrael2108 and remember also when you look in the Black's law dictionary under whatever your criminal offense is you need to go in there and look at the statutes of limitations because if they drag this thing out for too long then you get you get off on it anyway each case has a statute of limitations which means they have so many amount of days in which they have to try your case before they have to throw it out that's part of due process. Also remember this in America it's one punishment per one crime. So if you were already arrested for this crime and did any amount of time for this crime then they can't keep punishing you for it have to let him know that s*** too .
@@apisrael2108 oh yeah most importantly if they read you your Miranda Rights at the end they ask you if you understand you do not ever understand. It's a trick question because when you when they ask you do you understand that means do you stand under them are you giving them power over you so no matter what you do not understand they will go in circle for hours over that damn deal and you do not break down you do not understand
As your friendly, local, semi-retired attorney who hates litigation, I have seen enough to know that if you are representing yourself, the Magistrate, the Judge, or the Court will usually bend over backwards to make sure you present as much of your side as possible. I have seen Magistrates ask additional questions if the attorney failed to do so; and I have also seen Judges accept "objections" when they were not timely made because he knew the attorney was inexperienced and was not going to let the experienced attorney take advantage of him. I do not like their political agendas but the Legal Aid Societies can also help you find an attorney who will do the work Pro Bono or at a reduced rate. Where there is a Will, there is a Way!
If you are still under the name you were commenting Pro se youtube video Please reply
@@inessastanisloff5363 Why?
@@borisbadenov651 I am in boiling legal water I have to go against lawyers of bar association, ethical committee The administrative judge compromised her professional integrity. "They" did such a sloppy job justifying unjustifiable that I am nervous If there is a federal judge to their services? And to your "why"... Perhaps, you'll be willing to help me out
@@inessastanisloff5363 It would be quite foolish to conduct such "help" over the internet or in such a forum. YOU WILL HAVE TO DO SOME RESEARCH to find either an attorney or a "boutique law firm" that would be able to help you in YOUR Jurisdiction. It would not be easy to find a local attorney willing to take on the groups you have listed but that always depends upon the "facts" and whether or not it is worth their time and effort. In any event, here are 15 "law organizations" --- some specialize more than others --- that can either help you or help you navigate towards the type of counsel you need:
1. Liberty Counsel
lc.org/
2. Liberty Institute
www.libertyinstitute.org/about/faq
3. Pacific Justice Institute
www.secure.pacificjustice.org/site/SPageNavigator/contact_us.html
4. Advocates For Faith and Freedom
faith-freedom.com/
5. Alliance Defending Freedom
adflegal.org/about-us
6. National Legal Foundation
nationallegalfoundation.org/
7. Thomas More Law Center
www.thomasmore.org/
8. Thomas More Society
thomasmoresociety.org/
9. Christian Legal Society
www.christianlegalsociety.org/
10. American Center for Law and Justice
aclj.org/
11. Center for Law and Religious Freedom
www.clsreligiousfreedom.org/about-center
12. Christian Attorneys of America
christianattorneysofamerica.com/
13. Christian Law Association
www.christianlaw.org/
14. National Association of Christian Lawmakers
christianlawmakers.com/
15. Pacific Legal Foundation
pacificlegal.org/
@@borisbadenov651 Grateful for reply I am in DC That is "the bar" I am in combat I have already communicated with 5 agencies from the list you sent
In family court I have observed corrupt judges doing favor after favor for their lawyer colleagues while ignoring the law...
Look up Dad vs CPS YT channel, and also David Straight.
Hello to all. This guy has some very very valid points. I support him One Hundred (100) percent (%). It's a club no doubt. I was able to win my case on my own. It was not easy procedurally I was beat the facts were on my side. The police were surprised at my articulate direct questions. The issue is most people can not stay calm and think ahead. I ignored the Crowns jabs and gentle taunts and forced the police and crown to prove it...several day trial to which I won as the allegation(s) could not be proved...I have been told what's more impressive is I get all my firearms back...almost unheard of...lawyers wanted 25,000.00. I met with legal aid which was a joke...I trusted myself more than legal aid and won...hands down...
Great Job
I filed suit against a self storage facility that locked me out because I was rescuing kittens, with the manager's permission, and then seized my valuables and sold whatever was left over, to the receptionist's father. They abused me for several years and even had me arrested for calling them by phone. I have survived a motion for summary judgement and another motion for dismissal. The trial is next week. I have no idea what to do. I filed in Chancery Court because my mental health required that i find out whose name was on the bogus bill of sale. The judge did this for me, but then wouldn't let me add him to the list of defendants. I am scared. Any suggestions? I didn't ask for an amount, but I think I will ask for 1 million.
How did it go?
What he said is very true but if nobody fight for justice our society will be back to dark age.
Everyone i know that elected to use an attorney were devastated by that attorney. Without exception.
I totally agree. It’s unbelievable. I have an attorney that seemed to be on my side and wanted to go to trial. At pretrial he was angry at me for not excepting some plea… can’t trust him they lle through their teeth
I just finished divorce trial three weeks ago I lost my half of my home and I am paying alimony on a business I stopped doing three years ago when I was suffering from Cancer and Chemo.There is no Law it doesnt matter if you have Cancer it doesnt matter if your Wife is divorcing you because she had a boyfriend.The system is designed for the money to go to the lawyers and if you represent yourself you will witness people lying under oath and the reality will be that if you dont give in then you will go to jail for the false accusations placed against you.My only regret on that day was that I had served my country for six years and that the people I swore to protect under oath were the people who robbed me.
Anthony, a Christian WW2 Vet, warned me in the late 70's "in the End Time's, wickedness will abound!" I unwillingly went to Trial, facing her 5th Liar who produced a fraudulent Income Tax Return only showing 12 of 26 Bi-weekly Garnished Support Payments from my Disability Benefits! Her first 3 taXpayer funded Liars all committed fraud and perjury on Sworn and Affirmed Affidavits and Form 13.1 Financial Statements!
Hold your head up high, and as much as the losses hurt, remember that "Vengeance is mine saith the Lord" You came into this world naked, and we may have to leave destitute, but with personal honor!
Scripture verses are Common Law, and Judge's and Liars squirm when you use it!
ISAIAH 5:20 Woe unto them who call good, evil, and evil, good!"
I read that to a Judge, and he was retired before a week was over! God will deal with them! Study the precepts of Common Law!
I beat a speeding ticket, and turned a collection suit into a counter claim. It took a lot of time, and wasn’t easy. But after hearing the cop tell me he never lost a case, ever, and hearing the debt collector moan as I demanded the money I sure would try again!
No lawyer or judge can overcome the facts and the evidence. If you have no evidence, it's a gamble.
I represented myself 20 years ago because I charged with assaulting 5 police officers and disorderly conduct.
All charges dropped, if I was smarter at the time and know what I do today I would filed a claim in civil court.
BP.
2024AD.
Was this in canada?
First, You should not through your and others like you, opinions on other people. I have won in court representing myself FOUR times and WON each time! Listen t these people. They entered the court room and did not DO THEIR HOMEWORK!!!Every time I tried to use a Lawyer I had to fire all of them for misrepresentation EACH TIME! You have to first BELIEVE IN YOURSELF!! SECONDLY, you have to do your homework!!! Go sit in on civil cases. Sit in on ones represented by the legal field and ones not represented by the legal field. YOU ARE YOUR OWN WORSE ENEMY w/ your self-defeating attitude!!. Remember there is someone higher than the courts watching over you and all you have to do is ask.
Save Berth great point on your success. Who's this that's higher than the courts?
I agree with your advice to a certain degree, you shouldn't take the outcomes of other ppls cases as a guarantee that yours will end in the same way, thinking it hopeless. I would hope doing enough research and knowing your shit pretty thoroughly would be enough to arm yourself with all you need to defend yourself in court. But on the other hand, how realistic is it to sit in on court cases and prepare by doing the "homework" required in order to achieve that end in a criminal court case for instance, where you've been charged with a felony outta left field? You're getting booked, processed and then housed until you go to court. Where's there time for homework in that kinda scenario? I've been to jail more times than I care to admit and, although I did commit some pretty reckless thefts and burglaries, I saw enough court cases in custody that I can assure you 100% that justice is not what the players are after. They're after all that they can get from anyone who sets foot on their field from the public sector. One thing I observed at least a half dozen times, something I found very odd and suspicious, was the courts, judges, DAs, lawyers, tended to show sort of an intentional ignorance, you could say, when it came to child molestation cases, and leniency towards the accused suspects. Too many times. I watched one man in custody next to me, supposedly still innocent as he had not yet been convicted of anything, be scarred and intimidated into taking a plea with shoddy evidence against him for fear of losing and getting worse penalties, and then watch a man accused of a violent molestation case be Treated almost as though he hadn't done anything nearly as heinous, bail granted, or reduced to some petty misdemeanor with a very short leash. And next, what's this? Caught with drug periphernalia and dope? Bail denied, 1st offer 2 yrs with half... then next, found naked with a little girl who was his neighbors child? Bail set at 5k or the fuckers werent even in custody yet, then issued another court date for later down the road. Also seen a man get 3 yrs with half time for beating the shit outta some old man who had sex with his 11 yr old niece. It was rape actually, like his niece testified, but was dropped down to some lude and lascivious act with a child BS, which was hardly even noticed cuz they were too hell bent on demonizing the guy who beat the shit outta the pervert. Call me crazy, but I sensed some favoritism towards sickos.
@@dgushardy1 Here's a 7-min video that can show you who is the "someone higher than the courts watching over you" that @Save Berth is referring to: ruclips.net/video/WDEBz25lGdY/видео.html
Also, he's right, we've had that same success in the courts without a lawyer.
Also, start with these videos to understand what the real battle is:
ruclips.net/video/SWF1EqUZBbc/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/BQmoiPVURLA/видео.html
@@colehanson2033 I'm now one of the innocent and yes someone assaulted me and strangled me 2011 and took me to Trial from jail and said I broke the orbits of my eyes myself. Interesting I think I won he got a whole extra year in jail for strangling me. Hmm. My son got 6 months for not paying child support. Doesn't add up! Doesn't Sorry oh in case it matters which I wish it didn't I'm a White 59 year old grandma. Ugh
This is the most powerful video on RUclips about Court and Lawyers 😮
There is no justice in the family court system.
Always represent yourself. I did and got my case dismissed.. just do your HW and have all your proof
I represented myself in court against the department of Human Resources aka child protection service and I WON easy peasy
This guy is merely proof of what is wrong with the justice system and fighting for your rights
Yes - fight for your rights Wilson - but know that if you self-represent the statistics say you have about a 2% chance of winning. Such is the prejudice of courts and the legal profession against persons who do not hire a lawyer. Good luck, and God Bless. Donald
I was thinking the same thing. I wonder if he got paid to do this video.
Yep he’s part of corruption
this guy is a proof of a sore loser
These cases are when NOT to represent yourself, I would only do it in criminal cases and I have grown up in the system. I've been in over 20 bar brawls and loads of charges, had a lot of cases related to assaults and weapons, all have been pleaded down to seem like I'm not that bad of a guy, which I'm not, I beat up bullies. Always have, always will. So, remember You have to play to the "club's" hand... I plea down charges to appease their need to win, the thing to realize is they need to keep their jobs, if criminals stop doing crime, they are out of a job. DO NOT FORGET THAT!!! I have heard that from multiple people in the Justice system. In a criminal proceeding the Public Defender is basically railroading you into a substantial charge so that they can all collect a paycheck from your situation, it may seem like a good deal but usually they are just offering you some chicken scratch. The kicker is that if you represent yourself, you have a lot better hand due to this one fact and statement... (and I've threatened DA's with this before) "We can come to a fair conclusion in this matter or... I can drag the trial out as long as possible and demand a retrial for inadequate representation, meaning myself... It is a legal loophole that they will all hate, because it ties up their docket and lowers their clearance numbers and rates and they cannot legally stop you from doing this. You will be granted a Re-Trial." THIS IS YOU LOOSING GRACEFULLY!!! YOU WILL NOT WIN ANY CRIMINAL COURT CASE WITHOUT A HIGH PRICED LAWYER OR TRULY DEDICATED PUBLIC DEFENDER. Remember, in a court of law the testimony of a Peace Officer is entered in as FACT! DO NOT MESS AROUND.
So your saying if your getting a crappy pd n he's not representing you right , or offering a decent plea to fire him n go pro se? I got a case coming up for pretrial
I have no idea what case(s) you went to court for. However, I went back on a criminal case which if not I would have lost 20 years over a minor drug case when I was in my early twenties. I not only appealed my case twice and won; but also had my entire sentence vacated. I did become a paralegal in College (prison) and since my release 20 plus years ago I have won traffic tickets as well as helped many others. If you are intelligent and have a real desire or must to win you will learn all the court procedures and bylaws. If you can draw up a motion with supporting case-law you have a good shot at a fair shake. I agree they are all in the same club but ALWAYS REMEMBER THE RECORD IS YOUR FRIEND.
OF COURSE IM NOT A MEMBER OF THE BARR ASOCIATION. I ASSOCIATE WITH THE CONSTITUTION AND. CONSTITUTION IS AN IRON CLAD CONTRACT ENFORCEABLE IN THE COURT OF LAW.
Nothing a code number and law library can't fix,every law comes with notes and decisions there you will find a defense.
A bar attorney is an officer of the court and his first obligation is to the court and not the client
Uh every state is a Corporation. We are dead in common law yet it doesn't matter they make it up as they go in favor of money and jail is money. Either way im
In an entrapment. What to do?
@@avalonmist254 . . . . invoke common law, speak out
Go to. Youarelaw.org.
Or maybe .com
The guy is named T.J
The basic mistakes people who represent themselves make is not looking at the court docket before hand, being sworn in and asking for a court reporter. Don't answer any questions until all that is done otherwise you have no chance.
Remove your manipulative video. You were in prison and we know what was done to you.
lmao!!!! he's bitter
Imagine this guy giving weight loss advice to an overweight person...
" you think you can lose weight you're wrong, it's hard, most can't and what makes you think you can".
"Those buff guys in the gym all have special tricks that you don't have"
"The food industry is rigged against you to keep you fat, and you can't do anything about it"
"You think you can learn enough to lose weight, haha you can't"
"Just give up and stay fat and live a happy life"...
This guy is a clown, a fear mongerer.
I want you to know that I am suing a few individuals in Vermont... the court staff have been very kind with me and even some judges! It's like a game of chess, you have to be ahead of your opponent 10 moves. I even recused a few judges and those recusals were granted so I am doing something great and I am winning.
Are you pursuing them via 42 USC 1983, tort claim, state statute? Just curious. I live in Vermont and am preparing to move forward pro se on litigation seeking damages.
A disgruntled advocate said...you have a good lawyer...I replied God is my lawyer....hopefully if you have your facts and tell the truth justice will prevail
I see a lot of positive thinkers here and I'm glad to see it. One small piece of advice please. Inform your friends your family and anybody else you can and educate them on jury nullification? That is a great weapon in court. look under corporate laws. That's what you're dealing with when you walk into courts . look up the difference between Article 1 and article 3 courts. . Demand the court of republic. Which is under common law? Ask them to prove jurisdiction and their laws. Understand 4 d courts, no due process, child support and CPS are totally illegal........gby all
This man speaks the truth 100% truth!! If you can NEVER enter the legal system or else you will be in a nightmare that never ends.
Sometimes you don't have a choice!
Lmao "just walk away", they definitely laughed after uploading this
NOW U GOT ME LAUGHING 😅
This is disgusting! Because every person deserves to be respectful. Agree, the courts are a system that don’t allow outsiders in.
The fact that they don’t give any examples of what happens in court and how they were attacked/ambushed is what makes this unbelievable to me. This video seems to be a scare tactic to me. I could be wrong but that is what my gut is telling me.
Hello Peter. I understand and welcome your scepticism. If only the general public would question everything as you do, the world would be a better place.
I invite you to carefully consider all the evidence at my website - DonaldBest.CA and I do mean carefully consider all the evidence.
You might also want to consider that two days ago I was honoured with the Ontario Civill Liberties award. This honour was a huge surprise to me.
We can change things if we apply ourselves.
ocla.ca/ocla-civil-liberties-award/
Lawyers are sacred of everyone representing themselves @ court... why????? cause their Money maker ends... No one should pay an attorney to speak for them... educate yourself and you could be your own attorney and represent documents w/facts on your own to the court system. If more people step up to these Club members... The court system decisions/rulings will get fixed.
This guy's full of it. I represented myself on a traffic violation once. I treated everybody respectfully they treated me respectfully. I issued subpoenas, cross examined witnesses and gave testimony. Even though I lost the judge commended me on how decent and respectful I was. I paid the one hundred dollar fine.
How did you issue subpoenas
@@Stephspoppinworld Through the sheriffs department.
Say "non-lawyers," not "ordinary people." "Ordinary people" plays into the legal business prejudice that they are superior. They're not; they just like to pretend they are.
How can one represent their self and be their self at the same time?
good question
This exactly!
Hi Donald I cannot find your video on how to deal with an abusive lawyer can you please help me. Thank you.
I notice that the commenters below are split between agree and disagree with this man's viewpoint. I think it depends a lot on how corrupt the judiciary is in your local area. Everything he said is true in the Caribbean courts. They don't even follow their own rules half the time. Canada is a lot different. I found the judges there to be quite helpful to self represented parties. I've had the experience of proving my point in court in a civil case for a noise nuisance only to be told by the magistrate that I should refile the action as a private prosecution. Heads you lose, tails you can't win. All the same, I think people who have a good basic education should take the initiative to educate themselves on court procedure and etiquette and try to become independently proficient. If you flunked out of school you are definitely screwed whichever way you go. Time and time again I have found that lawyers put very little time and effort into your case. They get paid whether you win or lose and I think that is a fundamentally massive problem with the system that we have today.
There are lots of great uploads on RUclips but it does take up a lot of time to absorb it all. The rule books and the statutes are complex and endless. All I can say is if you persevere and you can get in front of an honest judge you do have a chance to succeed.
Hi Sysprog999 - Everything I said is about the Canadian courts - although it sure applies throughout the USA and the Caribbean too. Ontario, Canada is where a judge convicted me in absentia (while I wasn't in court) of contempt of court in a civil case during a hearing that I was unaware of and hadn't been notified of.
To obtain my conviction, three lawyers falsely told the judge (in writing and orally) that I had informed them during a phone call that I had received a certain court order. This was false as I had several times during the call denied receiving the court order and asked that it be sent to me.
When I returned to Canada with voice recordings of the call that showed the lawyers perjured themselves to obtain my conviction, the court refused to allow new evidence in the case. The corrupt judge did this to protect the lawyers who are fellow members of 'the Club'.
Over 100 lawyers refused to represent me when I returned to Canada because they did not wish to incur the wrath of the legal profession for turning on the corrupt lawyers. I was therefore forced to represent myself before the corrupt judge and the opposing corrupt lawyers.
You can read my full story at my website: donaldbest.ca/faqs-about-best-v-ranking/
Cheers and thanks for taking an interest.
Donald
Hi Donald. You got screwed. What they did was "fraud on the court". You should look into the mechanics of an action for fraud on the court. One of the aspects of such an action is that it can be done at any time in any court and by its very nature you would be able to present your evidence. You need a tough honest lawyer who will work on contingency ( no win - no pay) for a percentage cut of the damages you should be getting from those lawyers who screwed you over.
Hi Sysprog999. Yes, it was a fraud on the courts, and I do have a tough and competent lawyer. So here's how it all played out... I returned to Canada and the corrupt judge refused to consider my 'fresh evidence' - the recordings that prove the lawyers lied about several things that were foundational in my conviction.
So... the judge threw me in prison for 3 months. When some friends approached defense lawyer Paul Slansky and showed him the evidence, he came on board immediately and had me sprung on bail to appeal.
But the Court of Appeal would not let me appeal unless I paid several hundred thousand dollars in court costs already assessed against me on the basis of the false evidence. I didn't have that kind of money so I went back to prison to complete my sentence.
I was not even allowed to cross-examine the lawyers and other witnesses that the courts relied upon to convict and imprison me. I was not allowed to cross-examine the corrupt Ontario Provincial Police officer, Jim Van Allen, who worked illegally for the lawyers as an unlicensed private investigator, and whose ‘expert’ evidence was also used to convict and sentence me.
To this day, no court has listened to the forensically certified voice recordings of my telephone call with the lawyers that prove the lawyers lied to the court to convict and imprison me.
That is wholesale corruption where each court and judge tossed out the rule of law to protect the corrupt lawyers and judge who started the series of events.
My website has the details and the evidence that allows anyone to listen to the voice recordings, examine all the evidence and to judge for themselves.
Here's a summary:
donaldbest.ca/faqs-about-best-v-ranking/
@@donaldbest1295
Woah! Don't we live in the land of the wicked! I'm glad I found your Story! I Filed 4 an Appeal in Toronto, over corruption in Family Court, but didn't carry through, as it was to onerous! I see now it would have been a waste of time!
Donald, have you added to your Website with any updates? Have you seen the Article in the Toronto Star, "the Two Faces of Justice" about the LSUC and its terrible record on disciplinary action against it's members!
He's in Canada
"Donald Best is an Access to Justice and Anti-corruption advocate. A former Toronto Police Sergeant (Detective), he spent years in deep-cover investigations against organized crime, corrupt police and public officials. In 2010 while traveling abroad from Canada, he was convicted of Civil Contempt of Court in a civil case costs hearing he did not know was taking place. He was convicted in his absence on the provably false testimony of several senior lawyers and spent 63 days in prison - all in solitary confinement. The courts refused to listen to Mr. Best's voice recordings that prove his innocence and the lawyers' perjury - but you can listen to the secretly made recordings here, and watch other videos by Donald Best."
this guy must be from Canada, The law society is a criminal organization there.
America is corrupt too.
At 4:34-35 the chick says the rules and they’re not written out anywhere. ....... Wrong!!! The rules of civil procedure are easily accessible and State Civil procedure is modeled after the Federal Rules. Also every state has criminal procedural rules codified in its statutes and every court publishes it’s own local rules and they are pretty straight forward.
Thanks for your encouraging video, thanks for wasting our time with your nagging arguments. But will not break the will of those with a bold spirit and a lil wisdom . . here's the thing . . you don't fight them in their field (Statutes, Ordinances, Regulations) you fight them with your weapons (Private Rights, God-Given Rights, Constitution, International Human Rights etc) . . you throw their jurisdiction to the ground and they cannot win, you expose their scams
I represented myself as a defendent in a criminal jury trial. The system can be against you. But by learning the details you can use the system to your advantage. I appeared 22 times for this trial. Many times the judgeband prosecutor called me aside and offered me a deal. I wouldnt take it. I also didnt wave my right to a speecy trial, something almost every defense attorney will do.
I even got the judge to say of the prime witness "No, he has proved she is a liar, so he can ask her if she was lying then or now".
The jury came back in 10 minutes and found me not guilty.
WHAT he is saying is partially true, however the legal symbol is a two side scale meaning there IS injustice and there IS justice.
You will ONLY be abused if you don't fight back and learn the law and your constitutional rights. When representing yourself the judge and lawyers assume you are uneducated in law, however once you demonstrate otherwise the tide WILL turn. Furthermore evidence is key so if you can prove bias, misconduct, you have a case to present to the bar association and file a grievance against the opposing parties.
I've been learning as I go and it's powerful and I must say hard work and now I'm encouraged to get my law degree at 36! it's NEVER too late hay lol😉
Heldert Thelot isn't the bar association a corrupt organization? So how do you file a grievance against their members?
Heldert Thelot thanks for the correction. If I understand you right you're saying you don't have to be a lawyer to get into the bar?
Heldert Thelot apparently is not needed to know the law to represent yourself in court
This dude is in clearly in favor of anyone paying thousands of dollars to lawyers...I got your story pal...
I think so
It's a great idea to go to court if needed...... I represented myself through my hearings and everything went great everything went well but I also put so much time into learning the system and doing it right I spoke up for myself and I got what I wanted but if somebody is really weak and really scared then they need a lawyer or they need to walk away
Love it!!!!!! Im going all in
What does walk away mean? Don’t show up for court?
if you represent the self then who is you? who is self?
Walking away is a coward move!
Love it
Im going all in!!!!!!!
@@latonyakyle5550 I support you.
I was just Granted my faretta motion.
Because my Appointed public Pretenders refused to ascertain any Discovery
I’m proud of you!!!! 🙌🙌🙌
@@latonyakyle5550 Thank you L@tonya. That means the world to me. I dedicate this song from Prince to you called,
"Some Where Here On Earth"
Also "Rainbow " from Morris Day;
A Tribute to The Purple One;
Enjoy Latonya, you have a Wonderful name,& took a Beautiful picture.
Let me know of the songs when you get a chance ok?
I'm new at this you Tube stuff, and typing folks. Eye get a thrill when someone Response back.
Even if they say. Yo Bro go slap yurself😅
@@royaljustice6219 need to ask a question
14. When Justice Rosenberg considered the question of whether the Applicant had sufficient means to appoint counsel, he noted that based on the findings of Nordheimer J. (on the original Rowbotham application), the Applicant was not without means to fund counsel. However, having first concluded that the Applicant had not met the “merits” test to justify the appointment of counsel, this finding was arguably obiter. Additionally, in any event, to the extent that there is an arguable basis to challenge Justice Nordheimer’s dismissal of the Rowbotham application with the benefit of additional materials and/or arguments that Justice Rosenberg did not have at the time of the original s.684 application, it would be circular to rely on that ruling as a basis for concluding that the Applicant has means to retain counsel.
15. Additionally, whatever the Applicant’s financial circumstances at the time of Justice Nordheimer’s order, he is in no position to fund counsel. In fact, to the extent that the Applicant has any money available to him to fund counsel, but were frozen by the courts and taken away by bad lawyers before the due process and court prove him guilty which could be not used to defend his constitutional rights, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
It is respectfully submitted that, if the Applicant otherwise satisfies the court that his appeal has merit (including appealing the Rowbotham decision) and that the Applicant requires the benefit of counsel to be able to effectively advance his appeal, the means test has been satisfied.
(2) Merits of the proposed appeal based on the supplemental record or supplemental arguments not before Rosenberg J.A.
16. It is respectfully submitted that the Applicant’s appeal against conviction and sentence is not frivolous. Although the appeal will be a difficult one for the Applicant, the following grounds of appeal have some merit1:
(a) Nordheimer J. erred in refusing to appoint counsel for the Applicant pursuant to his R. v. Rowbotham application;
(b) The evidence of the Crown forensic accounting “expert” should not have been admitted as he was an investigator as opposed to an “independent”;
(c) The trial judge erred in finding that this was an appropriate case for a fine in lieu of forfeiture given the purpose of such an Order (ie. to deprive fraudsters of their unlawful personal gain);
I watched this video before I started pro se, and I have to agree with some. However I’ve dealt with lawyers and we just don’t get along because most of them are dishonest and indeed in the good ole boys club. I have gotten much better results being pro se, I just stick with the truth and eventually it over rules the lie , you have to have patience because like he said they will overwhelm you and try to force you to tap out.
Sui juris / not pro se
@@charlescoon6907 been there done that and they just don’t honor it. However right now today I still file pro se because those are their rules unfortunately.
Also eventide your in court and on record ask the judge and protector if they are standing on there oath now for this case today,l
All of the court rules are readily available online and can easily be studied and practiced. I represented myself during three criminal proceedings that we're all dismissed.
It does sound more like a threat. 🤔
Does the old look like he's looking in his lap reading to anyone else??
Yeah the reality is that they all know eachother and frown upon it which is sick.
He’s talking about the threat of violence... government only works with the threat of violence and coercion.. not due process
Sounds a bit like the confusion Im going through now. Sued a developer in small claims and now putting together my binders. Told that I must put it all in tabs in a binder. So, my document is 300 pages of my story and exhibits, how do you get that down to the 32 tabs that are only sold? How does that even make it more organized. So instead pay $500 on multiple binders, dividers, paper etc to have the judge ask why you split it all up.
All one has to do is challenge the standing and jurisdiction of the plaintiff and invoke the laws of the Republic, ask the court to have the plaintiff/ prosecutor ceritfy Your right to subrogation!!!
Give them the burden of proof you have contracted with them
How can you answer questions in court about the case of damage
Damn man. Thanks for the hard truth.
The harder the path the better. :) Wish me luck.
WTAstronaut how did you go?
Jail or Death
How's it going?
What happened?
I wish someone would’ve told me this last week, the judge wouldn’t listen to anything I said she only listened to my abusive husband because he had a lawyer.
I hired lawyers and still lost as the Petitioner AND had to pay the other parties attorney fees.
I filed a timely notice of appeal in the trial court and paid the filing fee and 13 days later the trial court judge dismissed my notice sua sponte with no motion, no hearing, no nothing.
5. The Applicant filed an inmate notice of appeal against his conviction and sentence received by the court on March 1, 2013. He applied for legal aid to fund his appeal but was refused. He has exhausted all appeals from that decision.
6. On June 12, 2013 the Applicant brought an application before Mr. Justice MacPherson for bail pending appeal. He made submissions without wanting the assistance of duty counsel. Ultimately, Justice MacPherson concluded that, on the basis of the material before the Court at that time, the Applicant had failed to satisfy the Court that his appeal had any merit.
7. On February 21, 2014, Mr. Justice Rosenberg (having been designated by the Chief Justice) heard the applicant’s application for a direction to review Justice MacPherson’s order of June 12, 2013. Justice Rosenberg considered the Applicant’s application and found that there was no basis to review Justice Macpherson’s finding that the appeal had no merit. He noted at paragraph 2 of his endorsement that “I have reviewed the materials especially those related to the Rowbotham motion and the charge to the jury. I can see no basis for coming to a different conclusion that Nordheimer J. for refusing the Rowbotham motion as set out in his ruling of September 29, 2011. He may have underestimated the sentence the appellant was likely to receive, but in all other respects his reasons justify the order made. The Applicant also sought the appointment of counsel pursuant to s.684(1) of the Criminal Code. The Court rejected the application finding that there was insufficient merit to warrant appointing counsel and that, additionally, based upon the findings by Nordheimer J. the Applicant was “not without means to fund his legal proceedings.”
8. On April 9, 2014, the Applicant’s appeal was scheduled for hearing on the inmate appeal list in Kingston, Ontario. The Applicant appeared. Duty Counsel also appeared. Duty counsel identified two potential areas of appeal for the Applicant in relation to the expert forensic accounting evidence adduced at trial and a sentence appeal. The Applicant submitted that there were additional materials relevant to the Rowbotham application that should also be produced so that he could revisit the s.684 application and because it was relevant to an appeal of the Rowbotham application. The Court ordered the Crown to produce further materials and asked duty counsel to review the material and, also, to assist the Applicant in revisiting the s.684 application if the circumstances warranted. With that direction, duty counsel offers the following analysis.
Prison hmmmm for doing the right thing!? He’s the courts alter boy.....⚖️⚖️⚖️👊🏻👊🏻👊🏻
Can you sue for slander and call the judge a blue eyed devil to open your case?
This man has to be an attorney lol
Nope... I'm an ex-cop who went to prison because provably corrupt lawyers and judges protected members of The Club. I've since been publicly vindicated, but law and the courts remain a racket. My story: donaldbest.ca/faqs-about-best-v-ranking/
The people that I know of that had the most success in court were people that represented yourself. If you wish to represent yourself then learn about Trust law.
I heard no all my life!!!! Legggo
I represented myself. And won Jesus help me
There is no court of justice, son; only a court of 'law'. Need to appear by 'special visitation' as your ALL CAPS name is a Cestui Que Vie Trust straw man. A natural, living sentiment man is NOT your name in ALL CAPS. Implied concent is where they get you. Always say out loud "I do not understand (stand under their statute) and I do not concent'.
Awesome Truth...I was told by a lawyer that 99% of the people going to the landlord/tenant tribunal represent themselves, I Replied, "Yes but less than 1% of self representated tenants win...!"...
this guys a bum☝🏾
Shill
Sir you should not tell people not to represent themselves in court. If we do not stand up to those criminals then nothing will change.people can do whatever they set their mind to..I DO NOT LOOSE IN COURT BECAUSE I KNOW THE LAWS..I HAVE NEVER LOST IN COURT AND DONT PLAN too.
People need to do this more.fight for our rights do not roll over .being negative only makes people dout. Themselves.and that's not cool..encourage and build up not DOWN YOU CAN ROCK IN COURT. BECAUSE if you do not try to make a change it won't happen.its easy to win in court! They work for me...
Hi Sue. I understand your perspective, and as I make clear in the video - sometimes you can't walk away and are forced to represent yourself. You can't afford a lawyer, or (as in my case) none have the courage or integrity to take your case, but the stakes are so high that you must pro se.
In 2022 in urban US and Canadian family and civil courts, as high as 80% of the citizens are forced to represent themselves. Yet only 3% to 5% of self-reps win in civil court. That's not a justice system - that's a profitable law-union protected business.
My caution to all remains though... self-representing yourself in court is far more difficult and dangerous than most people know. Only after they get into the system do they realize that the process is used as punishment, and that the justice systems are so heavily weighted against self-reps.
As George Carlin used to say.... "It's a club, and you ain't in it!"
@@donaldbest1295 God is my witness and Judge
Only God's rules count
Rules made up tomakeMoney are works of 🔥🔥
In other words roll over and pay. They won't abuse you if you know how to hold them accountable. Don't buy this guys BS!
Are you telling me to roll over and pay or not to listen to this guy I'm confused.. if you know how to hold them accountable that mean you've learned a game and you should have went to law school to be one of them you took your life in time to prove a point when you could have paid someone who went to school for that that's all he said you should walk away if you not part or pay for part of the crew to represent you
I only had to represent myself in court once. It was over a minor plate violation so it wasn't that serious. I was easily able to prove was my local DMV's error.
Let's back up a bit. I learned the hard way that my renewal tag didn't match my plates during a traffic stop. After getting a citation over my plates & giving myself a night to cool off ( I was reasonably angry) I went to my local DMV & asked a lot of questions. Turns out because my sister had me co-sign for her loan, my name was on her title. I found out we both owned cars from the same manufacturer & year so when they sold me my tags the clerk accidentally clicked on the wrong vehicle as they both show up next to each other in there system looking identical. Turns out it was an honest mistake on there part. I had to pay again to get the tags fixed (probably should of pushed for a refund on the bad tags if that was even an option. At least I was able to settle that with my sister when I told her what happened)
I wasn't certain what my legal options where so I got the advice of a lawyer. They told me that I was best representing myself as it was a minor citation & his fees greatly exceeded the amount of the fine.
As I could prove these facts with bank records because I had written checks for both transactions (that they oddly didn't even care to look at) I managed to get the fine reduced ( I only saved $15 off a $115 fine so I didn't save much).
I keep thinking that if it wasn't the government that screwed up & instead a store I'd have better options. The store I work for offers refunds on bad products & there are laws agents entrapment & extortion that are supposed to protect consumers from these kinds of issues. However, I learned that if the organization is the government they get to play by different rules then the rest of us. I considered suing my local DMV for damages but after speaking to a lawyer it appeared to be not worth the effort. I'd likely be paying $500 in fees just to get a $100 settlement (my fine amount) at best. Also if I'm paying court costs, is the government really getting punished if I am going after government? The whole mess feels a lot like extortion to me.
It may not be enough to satisfy me but I decided to never set foot in that specific DMV ever again as I feel a need to hold them accountable somehow. I have also noticed that I now hold a more negative view of my local government after this experience & it has had an effect on how I vote on local issues. Recently, I voted to deny the police tax $ to build a new facility they wanted. I figure if they want to build that, they can use the $100 I already gave them on that. I don't care if it's not enough.
I can absolutely attest to the truth in this video ..
how much did the trial lawyers pay you to publish this
Who is this creep? Maybe a lawyer who wants to make more money.
The law is simple, it is statutes, rules, procedures that make it difficult. None of these are law. The law is the constitution and the sheriff is the highest constitutional officer in the land who works for the people and is elected by the people. The sheriffs office also has a duty to act when presented with unconditional issues. Use the constitution and trust law I feel is the way to go. Finally, pay very close attention to the state BAR rules of scope of practice. BAR attorneys are bound and limited by these in your state. I’m not an attorney, I do not practice law, seek an attorney for legal (and not necessarily lawful) advice.
Sad but true. Good video.
Just yesterday I self-represented again as a Defendant in Family Court. The last few experiences of how the Judge treated me during proceedings, ignored my evidence, assumed that I was dishonest in all my sworn testimony, was crushing to me as a person. How court this "moral authority" conclude that I was a bad actor, let alone render extremely unfair decisions that cost me almost everything financially and in the relationship with my children.
Yesterday, I thought I had improved in every single way. I was confident the Judge would not even hear the matter as it defied all the evidence, which was documentary, and the law was crystal clear. But it happened again.
Opposing counsel was allowed to make wild accusations and misrepresent facts and yet the Judge only interrupted her to ask her about how much she was seeking in costs and whether she thought she was entitled to double costs.
In contrast, I was interrupted by the Judge every few sentences and challenged. I quoted Opposing counsel a few times and each time the Judge came to her defense claiming that the lawyer didn't actually say that, and offered excuses for the lawyer. When I stated that I was seeking costs the Judge flat out stated that I was not entitled to costs as I didn't incur legal fees.
The matter will be ruled on next week but I went in convinced that the matter would not even need to be heard, and left thinking that I'm going to lose with double costs charged to me.
A recent study concluded that many trial lawyers as well as business lawyers suffer from psychopathic personality disorder. Most of the judges I have dealt with in my life fit the bill for psychopathy. Don't take it personally. They really have no higher feelings or conscience.