I'm not very experienced with solvers but often some combos defend quite unfrequently so we might have like 20% of the K9s we had initially and defend 100% of those 20%
I wasn't aware of their rangebuilder, but the concept seems similar. The main differences seem to be the interfaces, you can analyze hands you've played with GTOx and their app allows the user to add each combo by weight . We considered adding frequencies, but thought it would be too difficult/cumbersome so our focus is more on general combo selection.
I don't want to be gloding, but as soon as Villain shoved on the river, I immediately thought "pocket 9s". It made a whole lot of sense to me. Maybe I had just luck ;)
since there is exactly 1 combo of quads (maybe less if you don't flat 99 100% btn vs bb), you can also safely ignore it or add it to full houses in your head without much danger
I play professionally and you seem more knowledgeable than me on this stuff for some reason. I have a question. Why does range construction matter if you have a solid grasp of GTO? Personally I do range construction, because I am old school but I can't bridge the gap between the fundamentals I learned decades ago and GTO. It seems I have to choose between, one or the other
You don't need to choose between one or the other. The fundamentals you've learned from experience are great use for you to exploit your opponents. Playing close to gto lines will help you become unexploitable. You should try to learn and play the GTO lines when you are playing against an opponent you don't have any exploits on yet or that seem to be playing close to gto themselves. You should use your experience with fundamentals and reads when you are playing weaker opponents and when you can pinpoint the specific exploits to take against them. You don't need to choose one or the other, both methods can be a valuable part of your overall strategy.
As for why range construction matters when playing GTO. GTO isn't a one size fits all solution for each spot. The perceived range of your opponent matters. The solvers can give you what the opponents optimal range should be in a specific spot, but our opponents aren't always playing optimal. Our most optimal strategy against someone open shoving every hand will be different then if we give them a normal opening range. The optimal solution can change depending on the course of action the opponent takes. We are trying to solve for our least exploitable path, but that can change if we can actually construct the opponents range. But you are right in questioning whether we need to accurately construct our opponents range if we are taking GTO lines in the first place. We can just assume the the opponent is playing optimally and create our GTO strategies based off that assumption and that will still be a solid strategy that can't be exploited. I think he's teaching range construction so that we can visualize our strategies better while playing in game.
Phil ivey sumed all this un neccesary garbage up in a nut shell. You have to live in the moment . Trust your gut in the moment thats all the gro you need
So to summarise: study as much as you want, but you will still depend on the variance. Poker is still gambling, a calculated gambling aimed to become "the game of skill", but basically its a Gambling.
This comment just demonstrates a lack of understanding of the theory and fundamentals behind GTO. One might also extrapolate that you have some anecdotal experience in attempting a GTO strategy but have fallen short of correct implementation. GTO is GTO because it is indifferent to the opponent.
No, she hates poker 😂. But I would guess that with less than 10k hands she is probably better than most people that play poker, which I think says something.
@@ArchieBallCat I don't know that much about Poker Bunny's game but if she is beating online no. Also it seems that poker bunny has been playing for a number of years and actually likes poker 😆
@@FindingEquilibrium not many gfs would do this for their boyfriends. She is a trooper, it'd be like you or me having to do makeup tutorial sessions. Have you gotten her into the live streets yet? I know she'd beat 90% of the 1-3 player pool.
Apreciando a una mujer tan hermosa. 2:10 sentadillas son unos LIKESEX.Uno muchas y un buen ejercicio. 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😍👍 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world losl mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
This is the greatest poker strategy/studying content I've ever come across. Advanced topics but presented in an easily digestible form.
Wow!! I'm committed to seeing all the videos on this channel and taking notes on them. Thank you
I might argue that table selection may be the most important skill for a pro
i been studying everyday for 6 months and these vids still seem above my comprehension lol
So pretty much in a nutshell. Know when to Hold'em and know when to fold'em.
Great class man. Always love your work
Great content as always.
FE: How many tips do you want?
Me: Yes.
You are a hero, every time you can turn my ideals into reality😍
this takes all the fun out of the game
2:45 gtowizard offers range construction aswell. Called range builder
Nice vid!!! But one question, in the final decision, solver says that we are bluffcatching with every K9. How tf do we have K9 there???
I'm not very experienced with solvers but often some combos defend quite unfrequently so we might have like 20% of the K9s we had initially and defend 100% of those 20%
It takes a little practice, but this way of working looks really great in any case.
How is this different than the rangebuilder feature that GTOWizard has had for like 6 months? Isnt it basically the same thing?
I wasn't aware of their rangebuilder, but the concept seems similar. The main differences seem to be the interfaces, you can analyze hands you've played with GTOx and their app allows the user to add each combo by weight . We considered adding frequencies, but thought it would be too difficult/cumbersome so our focus is more on general combo selection.
Hello.. What qualifies as a high flop? Does the flop need 3 cards Tens or higher? Does AQ7 qualify as a high flop? Thanks
Great video. I’m taking notes for my students.
do you do 1 on 1 coaching and if so whats your rate?
Uh hate to say it but jlittle has a range constructor? So they do exist?
Love the "trees in a forest" metaphor .... Bob Ross is smiling in his grave!
I love this program!
thanks for your videos 🥰
Is this feature live now? I don't see this option on my solved hands.
Should be live soon.
thank for your videos really
There's no way this is more efficient than just looking at solutions for countless hours
*holistic*
❤
I love the monkey example 😂
I get this isn't the point of the video, but no one is going to guess pocket 9s in villains range. One 9 yes, two, no way...
I don't want to be gloding, but as soon as Villain shoved on the river, I immediately thought "pocket 9s". It made a whole lot of sense to me. Maybe I had just luck ;)
since there is exactly 1 combo of quads (maybe less if you don't flat 99 100% btn vs bb), you can also safely ignore it or add it to full houses in your head without much danger
I liked this channel more when entire videos weren't commercials
in other words... don't waste your time.
The most important skill is avoiding vodka
I play professionally and you seem more knowledgeable than me on this stuff for some reason. I have a question. Why does range construction matter if you have a solid grasp of GTO?
Personally I do range construction, because I am old school but I can't bridge the gap between the fundamentals I learned decades ago and GTO. It seems I have to choose between, one or the other
You don't need to choose between one or the other. The fundamentals you've learned from experience are great use for you to exploit your opponents. Playing close to gto lines will help you become unexploitable. You should try to learn and play the GTO lines when you are playing against an opponent you don't have any exploits on yet or that seem to be playing close to gto themselves. You should use your experience with fundamentals and reads when you are playing weaker opponents and when you can pinpoint the specific exploits to take against them. You don't need to choose one or the other, both methods can be a valuable part of your overall strategy.
As for why range construction matters when playing GTO. GTO isn't a one size fits all solution for each spot. The perceived range of your opponent matters. The solvers can give you what the opponents optimal range should be in a specific spot, but our opponents aren't always playing optimal. Our most optimal strategy against someone open shoving every hand will be different then if we give them a normal opening range. The optimal solution can change depending on the course of action the opponent takes. We are trying to solve for our least exploitable path, but that can change if we can actually construct the opponents range. But you are right in questioning whether we need to accurately construct our opponents range if we are taking GTO lines in the first place. We can just assume the the opponent is playing optimally and create our GTO strategies based off that assumption and that will still be a solid strategy that can't be exploited. I think he's teaching range construction so that we can visualize our strategies better while playing in game.
I'm starting to feel sorry for Ariel.
👍🏼
GOD FUCKING DAMMIT WHAT CARDS DID HE HAVE
Who is the guy behind the channel? Is he a pro?
yeah I am kind of curious to see this guy's graph
@@paulhiggins140 easy to imagine how his graph looks.
A winner one with a positive red line.
solvers don't bluff
The most important skill in poker is learning patience. That, and staying off ACR, the most rigged site ever!
all are
Phil ivey sumed all this un neccesary garbage up in a nut shell. You have to live in the moment . Trust your gut in the moment thats all the gro you need
Cheating?
So to summarise: study as much as you want, but you will still depend on the variance. Poker is still gambling, a calculated gambling aimed to become "the game of skill", but basically its a Gambling.
variance? lol
Im glad variance helps me so much 🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
I wish this stuff worked at 99% of poker games, not just high stakes.
It does. It works better at lower stakes.
It works at lower stakes before you can categorise villain. Just you have to have preflop down first.
This comment just demonstrates a lack of understanding of the theory and fundamentals behind GTO. One might also extrapolate that you have some anecdotal experience in attempting a GTO strategy but have fallen short of correct implementation.
GTO is GTO because it is indifferent to the opponent.
I want to hear more about your girlfriend's Poker.
Is she better than you yet ? 😊
No, she hates poker 😂. But I would guess that with less than 10k hands she is probably better than most people that play poker, which I think says something.
@@FindingEquilibrium Better than Poker Bunny yet?
@@ArchieBallCat I don't know that much about Poker Bunny's game but if she is beating online no. Also it seems that poker bunny has been playing for a number of years and actually likes poker 😆
@@FindingEquilibrium sure. teach to her how the algorithm works. not playing poker.
@@FindingEquilibrium not many gfs would do this for their boyfriends. She is a trooper, it'd be like you or me having to do makeup tutorial sessions. Have you gotten her into the live streets yet? I know she'd beat 90% of the 1-3 player pool.
This is so unnecessary & over complicated.. What happened to thinking for yourself??
Apreciando a una mujer tan hermosa. 2:10 sentadillas son unos LIKESEX.Uno muchas y un buen ejercicio. 5:25 Se deja ver que hay muy buenos resultados 😍👍 Saludos desde la Cd.. de world losl mortales abian apreciado tan hermosa mujer
New video from the channel promoting cheating in poker . Great !
This is a training and study tool, not RTA you meatbag. But thanks for algo comment
I guess improving at poker at a rapid pace could be considered cheating.
@@FindingEquilibrium you exactly know what I was referring to , but keep pretending. 🤡 . You know that I know. 🤑
@@Paulie-Gualtieri What does FE know that you know?