I honestly think we are giving the rouge nation too much credit for their weapons technology, if their radar can be flown under and their targeting systems can’t tell the difference between the jet infront of it and the terrain around it, then I don’t think they got missiles that have proxy fuses, also why are flares working this effectively, don’t missile currently have ways to tell the difference between a flare and the actual engine
@@YarAresмне препод говорил, с хорошим двигателем и табуретка полетит 😂 ох как он был прав если тяговооруженность больше 5 то вообще пофиг есть планер или нет 😂
Hey there, stop for a sec. Read this: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life." -John 3:16: the Son is Jesus Christ. Life is too short to just throw it away. Live it right for God, love God, and inherit eternal life in God's eternal kingdom!! And receive true joy, peace, and meaning in life! Jesus Christ loves you so much, He is your Creator after all 😊
Nothing new! Look up the X31 that could already do that back in the 80s. Thrust vectoring is old tech, F22 has it. Even the LEM had a gimbled engine back in 68!
@@TinPanMan_REAL Its really not that hard of a maneuver, the thing that makes it rare is how demanding of a maneuver it is. You need certain amounts of lift to be generated in a turn, certain energy retention, etc. The reason why you see Russian fighters do this all the time is because of their design philosophy. America thinks that to design a new and effective aircraft you need great radar, be able to carry a big payload, use modern missiles, be able to carry out a lot of different roles, have a lot of fuel, etc. Russian's, however, try to design super maneuverable aircraft because for some reason they think that dogfights are still a thing. they are not. They died in the vietnam war.
@@leduckified1534Fuel in usa jets???😂😂😂 wtf you about? Russian jets are bigger and have bigger internal fuel tanks. Su-27 has no thrust vectoring and can do all of thats maneuvers. But not only that design is used in Russia. Russia has high speed interceptors with 300+ kilometers range amraams, strategic bombers, attakers and fighterbombers Su-34.
That maneuver would have made it even easier for the missile to splash it. Yet, apparently, the proximity fuse decided to go on a strike and not to work when the missile passed 5 metres away from the plane.
@lamename8030 jamming the wez doesn't mean he was using trons, missy. Just means he was too close for the missile to track its target by pulling enough g to intercept.
@@krizztykrab2297 he at the start of movie survive explosion at 3 mach, brobably without parachute and close to end he successfully uses flares against rockets with radiolocation and so on, so on. It like if plot armor was his official superpower, like luck in Deadpool.
@@ankilo5519 Can you explain to me the fundamentals of how an energy management diagram for a fighter jet is read as well as what information they give to the pilot?
How to defeat missiles IRL: Jinking, notching, drastically reducing altitude, countermeasures How to defeat missiles in movies: do an airshow maneuver that bleeds all your speed, conveniently forget that proximity fuses has existed since WW2
Your absolutely right, but just a reminder that notching only works for Radar missiles, although it could theoretically make an IR missile harder to hit you, but not by much.
😂 Real French pilot told us This manoueuvring allow russian's aircraft to disapear from the missile's guidance..so it's not about movies but This is Real
Purchase VR helmet+ hotas+rudder pedals and buy any modern aircraft in DCS come through a PvP server..and u Will see how difficult u Can use your gun in this situation....years ago i Would Say the same things like u ..but DCS show u the truth if u don't use as a game..but as a tutorial or Real sim ❤
@@Bryan-cd9clIn DCS if someone is dumb enough to do this maneuver, just make a vertical roll then you will find a target with very low energy stage and altitude.
@@alexchang2712 becoz their idiot. Theres a place and time for it. If ghe other plane chasing you is too far away then theres no point doing thjs move
Y'know what? Hot take: I'm giving the movie the benefit of the doubt. We'll say that missile malfunctioned, that's all well and good, it happens. What's REALLY unforgiveable is that Maverick just watched an enemy pilot bleed all his speed for an aerobatic maneuver that presented him a large flat surface for at least 5 seconds, and NEVER ONCE thought to follow through on that missile with the guns. HE WAS HANDED THAT KILL ON A PLATTER AND INSTEAD JUST CHOSE TO STARE DUMBFOUNDED AS HE OVERSHOT ENTIRELY. The ace pilot of the movie, ladies and gentlemen.
The range was quite close, would be risky to shoot there due to debris And, it's not like this isn't the movie where S-125 does not need radar and fuses on flares, while lacking a fragmentation warhead. Or where Maverick shrugs off a mid-air breakup at hypersonic speeds like it's nothing.
The funny thing is most of the defining factors of the 5th gen aircraft have been a "collaboration" between US and USSR research. Modern stealth theory was invented by USSR physicist Petr Ufimtsev, but implemented by Americans on the f117, and thrust vectoring was first experimented by Americans on modified f-15s but it was USSR which turned the feature to mass production with the Sukoi line.
Если побольше углубиться в науку ,то можно всего столько интересного откопать в разработках отечественных учённых ,просто у нас сейчас проблема с семейной составляющей ,нужно продвигать в массы и СМИ
You'd have to point your jet right at him though, while he's motionless in the air and you moving at 1-2 machs. Split second reaction that can either work or get yourself killed. If you really wanna take him out then point the jet at him and eject - praying the explosion doesn't kill you too since both jets have fuel + bombs on them.
It's crazy, requires great skill and is completely useless because you just turned you aircraft into a giant target(by facing top towards the enemy jet) and lost most of your energy
@@Xirenec_This technique is not completely useless. It can rarely be used, but it is not useless. According to your logic, it turns out that all aerobatics are useless.
There's a similar move done by a p 51 mustang done in WWII. With at least one confirmed kill. The pilot shot the Persuer down on his way past. Full back stick. Full bottom rudder. Torque of the prop turns you over. Nutrilize the rudder. Full forward stick and recover. About 1500 feet below and behind the pursuit aircraft. They'd just disappear.
Если такой маневр получится мустанг останется без энергии и не будет иметь преимущества он будет ниже и рано или поздно снова будет жертвой вертикального боя
Everyone writing how this doesn't have any combat applications, can we still appreciate how this maneuver looks absolutely amazing? In real life, not just the movie.
Su-27 can do it and Su-33 and they don’t have thrust vectoring. You’re pretty much turning the computerized flight control system off. F-14 can do it too bc of no FBW
@verticpc3546 they are the most skilled actually. They have the most flight hours out of any other airforce. Plus the maneuver is useless in a combat situation.
@@lockheedmartinf-22raptor73Idk mate, with many more training hours, yet they are incapable of pulling moves that Russian pilots can do... then either the US pilot training is significantly less efficient, or Americans are just not as talented.
You mean the scene where, from the missile's point of view, the plane just stops in mid air right in front of it? And yet, the missile still seems to miss? How could I forget?
not true - Su-57 has same IR blinding system as the combat helicopters - 101KS-O which is mounted in dorsal and ventral positions - if anything this maneuver positioned the drsal 101KS-O emitter perfectly to 'blind' the missile @@HaartieeTRUE
WWII P51D pilot Don Bryan initiated a similar maneuver which he named the vertical inverted reversement. It allowed him to avoid a Luftwaffe fighter which probably saved his life.
Practical or not aside, the original maneuver was so much cleaner than how TP:M producers understood and portrayed it. In TP:M you see the pilot actually doing at least one full unnecessary circle on the yaw axis instead of pointing its nose back onto Maverick ASAP to shoot a missile. It is as if the pilot lost control 😂
The only brakes I know on Sukhoi are the little platform that goes up in the middle of the airplane to reduce aerodynamics ( and speed) or the small parachute that usually is used when landing. I can't see them on this video so... This RUclipsr is wrong!
Except it's not. You never see the top profile of the aircraft in the illustrations of the cobra because the cobra is 2 dimensional, unlike this maneuver.
You should mention it’s beneficial to do it because it hides the heat from the winder and it’s difficult to determine what way he will go when he pulls out. Plus it’s mostly an Air Show move anyway 😏🖖🏼🇺🇸
Don't matter if you have a a Aim 120 when the Russians can shot a Vympel R37M and destroy your jet 200km before you can launch yours 😅 You have ever seen one of those little monsters?
@@Eluxivo the R37 would fail to fire due to poor maintenance and missing internal components, that were sold off by corrupt soldiers. also your having a totally separate conversation then the comment that your responding to.
@@Eluxivo just cause it has a long range doesn't mean it's going to track. The 200km range is for big heavy targets like refuelers, b-52s and AWACs. Firing that missile against a maneuverable fighter and thinking it's gonna it is classic russian copium lmfao
west jet or american jets? European jet have incredible maneuverability, unlike american which basically a flying brick who can't survive without the support of awacs
We have an expert here I see If you paid attention to the video you'll have noticed he described the tailslide, that is not the same as a cobra in any way. But even worse is that you say Kvochur's Bell is called the flying leaf, while the flying leaf most definitely isn't an official name for a maneuver, just try looking it up, and the falling leaf which I guess you meant is something wildly different
Supermaneuverability was first studied by the US and a swedish jet in the 60s was the first to be Supermaneuverable. Russian have had great minds but the US has technilogical dominance. The F-22 is only rivaled by the F-35.
An interesting fact, it was swedish air force saab 35 draken who first discovered and performed the first cobra maneuver long before Russia's pugachev.
Why? let's say it was a Japanese, Chinese or Indian person, their type of name pronunciation is different and complicated, you can't simply force someone to pronounce their name in their mother tongue, the only thing you should do is respect it.
@Combat_Aviator obvs doesn't have the hammer and sickle but it's what is placed on the red star. Clearly you don't know fighter planes in certain countries 🤣!
@@nickson_2024 The Soviet Union used a red star with white outline for its marking, with the russian federation using the same star with a line of blue added to make the star wit with the Russian flag and colors. Plus MIGs and Sus were exported to many countries, and are the most exported aircraft, by number of buyers, in the world. So that does not mean they are Soviet planes. Plus the SU-57 is the new Russian super-plane so for minor propoganda purposes they want to show a near half-century outdated naval aircraft blow them up with its cannon.
The Soviets also devoloped a manuever where they would hang the plane in midair with the tail down and the nose up , using the engine thrusts to keep the plane "standing" there . The plane would momentarily disappear from an opponents radar . The Soviet pilot would do this in a thick cloud if possible . The opposing pilot would also loose visual sight of the Soviet plane . Than the Soviet plane would have the element of surprise to sneak up on the opposing pilot . Pretty tricky .
15 апреля 2024 года ушел из жизни выдающийся российский летчик-испытатель Анатолий Квочур. Он освоил и испытал более 90 типов и модификаций летательных аппаратов. Его общий налет превышает 5 000 часов, в т. ч. испытательный налет - свыше 3 500 часов. За карьеру летчика-испытателя установил 11 мировых рекордов по стандартам Международной авиационной федерации, из которых 5 по состоянию на 15 апреля 2024 г. - действующие. Продолжал летать на сверхзвуковых самолетах до 65 лет. 16 апреля ему бы исполнилось 72 года.
![Rich Dunk (Ft. DaBaby) - BIG DAWG [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Pz2ewsSKAEM/mqdefault.jpg)
Gets out, fires a seeking missile n gets back in
360 noscope
@@Chachi636
What? No. That's Rendezook
Only in battlefield!!
@@markarchibald5968 would be great if we could do it in real life...hats off to the pilot that tries...and press 'F' to pay respects
Stun_gravy wants to know your location xD
Today Anatoly Kvochur has passed away. Rest in peace, Ace.
Kvochur was a great pilot, but he was not an Ace.
@@user-br6wj1ri3g вы точно не пилот
@musicrelaxing456, что с этих англосаксов взять
Isn't ace a specific title though? Like there are a ton of great pilots that never got enough kills to make Ace.
@@user-ei8jp2fc5d he is literally not an ace. Ace is a ranking and he fell short of it. Stop taking everything so personally.
proximity fuse: nah that's too cool I'm not ruining the moment
I honestly think we are giving the rouge nation too much credit for their weapons technology, if their radar can be flown under and their targeting systems can’t tell the difference between the jet infront of it and the terrain around it, then I don’t think they got missiles that have proxy fuses, also why are flares working this effectively, don’t missile currently have ways to tell the difference between a flare and the actual engine
I mean it’s an F-14 old ass aircraft and the missiles maybe older
@@asiangaming8409 Proximity fuses are *older* than all air to air missiles though, it's literally WW2 era technology.
@@frankeinfishit's Hollywood what you expect
@@aewon2085 the part about radar not finding targets because of the ground is true. Russian radar still has problems with it.
Imagine if the test pilot was American, “The Steve Maneuver”
Sounds cool enough
Chad maneuver
"Cave Johnson's Maneuver"
That's the thing.
No steve, or john or tom would do this. Not enough vodka in their system😂
@@hasangarmarudi2178that pilot really said 'hold my vodka'😂 and intercepts them😂😂
Russian jets casually turning gravity off
Yes I remember those days at school when we studied about Ivan Gravitin, the inventor of gravity
I hate Gravity
I look Japanese flag in there
Российские самолёты не случайно отключили гравитацию, для них она не помеха
@@YarAresмне препод говорил, с хорошим двигателем и табуретка полетит 😂 ох как он был прав если тяговооруженность больше 5 то вообще пофиг есть планер или нет 😂
You may not like it Minister, but you cannot deny Kvochur has style.
I know this line
Yep. Only style
“What the fuck was that”
Most pilots would never perform this maneuver because they would expose too much of their plane to being shot With machine guns
@twistedxxfreedom1379 as well as lost all their velocity
*Su-57 stalling noises*
@@twistedxxfreedom1379 mostly because the speed lost would be fatal in a fight
@@twistedxxfreedom1379cannons not machine guns
One of the top 5 aerobatic maneuver.
what
Hey there, stop for a sec.
Read this: “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life." -John 3:16: the Son is Jesus Christ.
Life is too short to just throw it away. Live it right for God, love God, and inherit eternal life in God's eternal kingdom!!
And receive true joy, peace, and meaning in life!
Jesus Christ loves you so much, He is your Creator after all 😊
@@Jesus_Christ_loves_you_alot bot
@@Jesus_Christ_loves_you_alotTake your invisible sky Daddy and leave. Spam.
Straight out of a circus
In my opinion this is like a jet doing a drift
Same
The aerial equivalent of doing a 360° drift spin
Bro literally pronouncing it “Kay-vo-chur” 💀
He has a great youtube channel - A-vi-o-en-i-kay-ze
@@MrYaybookilling me 😹🖖🏼🇺🇸
he should've googled the pronunciation first, now he sounds like a moron forever 😂
Honestly a better pronunciation
Love the Kino pfp
i like how they displayed the thrust vectoring
was this sarcastic or not, im stupid
@@spongebleebNo thrust vectoring was used so......
Rooster: “Mav, wtf was that ?”
Mav still processing and running for his life😅
Without a doubt one of the best aerial manoeuvres I’ve ever seen in my entire life 😮
If your wondering, most Russian jets can do crazy maneuvers like this because there able to gimble there engines in different directions
Nothing new!
Look up the X31 that could already do that back in the 80s.
Thrust vectoring is old tech, F22 has it. Even the LEM had a gimbled engine back in 68!
The one in the video is an Su-27. And it doesnt have Thrust Vectoring. Planes can do this without it.
@@leduckified1534 oh, guess they are just really talented
@@TinPanMan_REAL Its really not that hard of a maneuver, the thing that makes it rare is how demanding of a maneuver it is. You need certain amounts of lift to be generated in a turn, certain energy retention, etc. The reason why you see Russian fighters do this all the time is because of their design philosophy. America thinks that to design a new and effective aircraft you need great radar, be able to carry a big payload, use modern missiles, be able to carry out a lot of different roles, have a lot of fuel, etc. Russian's, however, try to design super maneuverable aircraft because for some reason they think that dogfights are still a thing. they are not. They died in the vietnam war.
@@leduckified1534Fuel in usa jets???😂😂😂
wtf you about? Russian jets are bigger and have bigger internal fuel tanks. Su-27 has no thrust vectoring and can do all of thats maneuvers. But not only that design is used in Russia. Russia has high speed interceptors with 300+ kilometers range amraams, strategic bombers, attakers and fighterbombers Su-34.
This pilot is a BADASS man 😱 This maneuver is the best thing I’ve ever seen by far!
That maneuver would have made it even easier for the missile to splash it. Yet, apparently, the proximity fuse decided to go on a strike and not to work when the missile passed 5 metres away from the plane.
no, it wouldn't, he was jamming the WEZ, so the missile would not have armed at that distance, as that could have destroyed both planes.
@@gtifighterhm?
@@lamename8030 what "hm"?
@@gtifighter how you know he was jamming missy? was that implied in the movie?
@lamename8030 jamming the wez doesn't mean he was using trons, missy. Just means he was too close for the missile to track its target by pulling enough g to intercept.
Mover said “If someone gives you that much face full of jet… shoot!”
Cual modelo se especifico
@@Angel-st9gbthats an su-57
if you doomed because noone can beat Maverick, even some 7-gen plane, so why not make at least cool maneuvers?
@@trololoevtrue plot Armor is the biggest strength!
@@krizztykrab2297 he at the start of movie survive explosion at 3 mach, brobably without parachute and close to end he successfully uses flares against rockets with radiolocation and so on, so on.
It like if plot armor was his official superpower, like luck in Deadpool.
I love seeing people that have no knowledge on military aircraft talk about these sort of topics
U have anime pfp but I agree
It's a lot of fun reading their comments, yep.
And you are the type of person that watches a 4 minute video and thinks that he is already a professional
@@ankilo5519 Can you explain to me the fundamentals of how an energy management diagram for a fighter jet is read as well as what information they give to the pilot?
@@MuteSpider63393 aand you just confirmed my theory, thanks!
How to defeat missiles IRL: Jinking, notching, drastically reducing altitude, countermeasures
How to defeat missiles in movies: do an airshow maneuver that bleeds all your speed, conveniently forget that proximity fuses has existed since WW2
Your absolutely right, but just a reminder that notching only works for Radar missiles, although it could theoretically make an IR missile harder to hit you, but not by much.
😂 Real French pilot told us This manoueuvring allow russian's aircraft to disapear from the missile's guidance..so it's not about movies but This is Real
@@Bryan-cd9cl The maneuver has never been used in a combat scenario
@Bryan-cd9cl get off ur ass get on Google it's a air show move u would get blasted from several km away if u tried that in combat bro
@@Bryan-cd9cl You said it sarcastically but then said this is real?
The difference is that one do it in a movie and the other in real life😂😂
The other pilot: thanks for making yourself a bigger target for my 20mm
You would have to switch modes, then hope you have the proper AoA or able to get it, then not get ripped apart by shrapnel
Purchase VR helmet+ hotas+rudder pedals and buy any modern aircraft in DCS come through a PvP server..and u Will see how difficult u Can use your gun in this situation....years ago i Would Say the same things like u ..but DCS show u the truth if u don't use as a game..but as a tutorial or Real sim ❤
@@Bryan-cd9cl Mf you make your plane wider and more flat so Even if you have all of that you can still chainsaw the enemy in half with your MG
@@Bryan-cd9clIn DCS if someone is dumb enough to do this maneuver, just make a vertical roll then you will find a target with very low energy stage and altitude.
@@alexchang2712 becoz their idiot. Theres a place and time for it.
If ghe other plane chasing you is too far away then theres no point doing thjs move
I honestly thought the movie was quite cliché and predictable but the parts with the fighter jets were very awesome
Y'know what? Hot take: I'm giving the movie the benefit of the doubt. We'll say that missile malfunctioned, that's all well and good, it happens.
What's REALLY unforgiveable is that Maverick just watched an enemy pilot bleed all his speed for an aerobatic maneuver that presented him a large flat surface for at least 5 seconds, and NEVER ONCE thought to follow through on that missile with the guns.
HE WAS HANDED THAT KILL ON A PLATTER AND INSTEAD JUST CHOSE TO STARE DUMBFOUNDED AS HE OVERSHOT ENTIRELY.
The ace pilot of the movie, ladies and gentlemen.
he mustve been in so much disbelief that the 57 pilot actually did something as ridiculously risky as that and forgot to shoot
The range was quite close, would be risky to shoot there due to debris
And, it's not like this isn't the movie where S-125 does not need radar and fuses on flares, while lacking a fragmentation warhead. Or where Maverick shrugs off a mid-air breakup at hypersonic speeds like it's nothing.
what's really unforgivable is that ... with AESA radar the su 57 didn'd shoot him from miles away
@@asatechnics8363 true lol
Everyone knows that. It’s a movie. You sound like you’d fun at parties.
Its almost like tuey forgot guns on that plane
Инжинеры СССР лучшие, хочется верить, что следующие разработчики будут не хуже !!!
The funny thing is most of the defining factors of the 5th gen aircraft have been a "collaboration" between US and USSR research. Modern stealth theory was invented by USSR physicist Petr Ufimtsev, but implemented by Americans on the f117, and thrust vectoring was first experimented by Americans on modified f-15s but it was USSR which turned the feature to mass production with the Sukoi line.
Если побольше углубиться в науку ,то можно всего столько интересного откопать в разработках отечественных учённых ,просто у нас сейчас проблема с семейной составляющей ,нужно продвигать в массы и СМИ
Soviet pilots sure did invent a lot of badass acrobatics
It was the Swedes lol
Russia North Korea and China and some African countries always doing the most in their military parades
The proximity fuse should have gone off in that shot.
Unfortunately Kvochur died yeserday. He was 71 years. He was a test pilot until 65.
F-14’s Vulcan cannon seeing him doing that maneuver: 🗿
You'd have to point your jet right at him though, while he's motionless in the air and you moving at 1-2 machs. Split second reaction that can either work or get yourself killed.
If you really wanna take him out then point the jet at him and eject - praying the explosion doesn't kill you too since both jets have fuel + bombs on them.
Еще со времен "мёртвой петли" самого Нестерова,наши пилоты остаются самыми лучшими в небе
I dont know what this guy said, but i just wanna see an F-22 do that.
@@chrisbrown-sj1ggyou literally have google translate integrated in youtube. Dude...
@@grey_box Oh look, a guy who doesnt know a joke when he sees it...
Of course a Russian pilot invented this move.. it's crazy and requires great skill
Us govt. Would never let a pilot do some shit like that.
@@RoyRoger-xq5zu beacuse of the price of the aircraft
It's crazy, requires great skill and is completely useless because you just turned you aircraft into a giant target(by facing top towards the enemy jet) and lost most of your energy
@@Xirenec_This technique is not completely useless. It can rarely be used, but it is not useless. According to your logic, it turns out that all aerobatics are useless.
@@Warsmith_Honsouit’s pretty much useless for combat purposes but for slowing down maybe but that requires you to be higher up or you might crash
Was Kvochur also a helicopter pilot, because that’s the same was to recover from a vertical stall in a helicopter. It’s like a backflip rounded off.
Лично знаком с Квочуром. Великий человек
Повезло! Завидую Вам по доброму! Герой моего детства
i can only imagine the insane G force involved
That maneuver was cinematic gold 🥇!
It's mind blowing that a human would willingly do this. 🤯
incredible sight
💎Rare Achievement-"What the f*ck was that?!" 0.02%
Space flight unlocked
A perfect gun shot position
Me successfully getting the Kvochur Bell maneuver:
Missile: 101% accuracy
There's a similar move done by a p 51 mustang done in WWII. With at least one confirmed kill. The pilot shot the Persuer down on his way past. Full back stick. Full bottom rudder. Torque of the prop turns you over. Nutrilize the rudder. Full forward stick and recover. About 1500 feet below and behind the pursuit aircraft. They'd just disappear.
That’s a basic stall manoeuvre, not necessarily a kvochurs bell which requires you to spin and roll over, which the p51 struggles at at slow speed
The segment is on Dog Fights by the History Channel. Best move I've ever seen by Richard Candelaria
Если такой маневр получится мустанг останется без энергии и не будет иметь преимущества он будет ниже и рано или поздно снова будет жертвой вертикального боя
It's Belkan witchcraft
Everyone writing how this doesn't have any combat applications, can we still appreciate how this maneuver looks absolutely amazing?
In real life, not just the movie.
"What the f was that?"
"Let me send you a RUclips link."
Named after Anatoly Kvochur, Анатолий Николаевич Квочур.
that's like the airplane version of _"bullet time"_ from The Matrix 😄
Great! now you're even a bigger target xD
An epic move made by balls of steel
Only can be done with jets that have thrust vectoring
Su-27 can do it and Su-33 and they don’t have thrust vectoring. You’re pretty much turning the computerized flight control system off. F-14 can do it too bc of no FBW
Can only be done with jets with more than one engine
@@brandonproctor3639the 33 does I’m pretty sure
@@laimejannister5627 no it depends on how the plane like moving and turning is
@@dickjohnson9028 no it depends on how the plane identifies itself.
Mav was so impressed that he didn’t switch to guns and just immediately end that jet.
In fact it is not the Kvochur maneuver, but the Blinchik maneuver. The Kvochur is completely different!
If this was done by an American everyone was commenting here
Sad their not skilled enough
@@verticpc3546 do not underestimate anyone mate
@@razvaniliescu2211 it's just facts
@verticpc3546 they are the most skilled actually. They have the most flight hours out of any other airforce. Plus the maneuver is useless in a combat situation.
@@lockheedmartinf-22raptor73Idk mate, with many more training hours, yet they are incapable of pulling moves that Russian pilots can do... then either the US pilot training is significantly less efficient, or Americans are just not as talented.
You mean the scene where, from the missile's point of view, the plane just stops in mid air right in front of it? And yet, the missile still seems to miss?
How could I forget?
Electronis warfare prob. Russian aircraft has pretty sick EW capabilities.
@@Zorro33313no, that was an ir missile, and the su57 has no ir countermeasures besides flares, which it clearly did not use.
@@HaartieeTRUE wut lol, su-57 has direct effect laser system that blinds homing heads and especially effective against ir missiles.
not true - Su-57 has same IR blinding system as the combat helicopters - 101KS-O which is mounted in dorsal and ventral positions - if anything this maneuver positioned the drsal 101KS-O emitter perfectly to 'blind' the missile @@HaartieeTRUE
"applying Brakes"💀
When you played too much Ace Combat as a kid and wanna show off in front of the nuggets
U must try to see SU30MKM
Su-30MKM is a derivative of Su-30MKI, and Mihail Pogosyan has publically stated that Su-35S is a more maneuverable aircraft than Su-30MKI.
@@Max_Da_G that doesn't mean that it can't do Kvochur's Bell Maneuver whatsoever
WWII P51D pilot Don Bryan initiated a similar maneuver which he named the vertical inverted reversement. It allowed him to avoid a Luftwaffe fighter which probably saved his life.
Also known as the "I will die but I will look cool doing it"
F-15E: All I Need is A JDAM
Practical or not aside, the original maneuver was so much cleaner than how TP:M producers understood and portrayed it.
In TP:M you see the pilot actually doing at least one full unnecessary circle on the yaw axis instead of pointing its nose back onto Maverick ASAP to shoot a missile. It is as if the pilot lost control 😂
Applying brakes? I’m a pilot and I can’t recall where the brakes were? Do you mean the parking brake?
Air brakes, you are not pilot if You don't know about it, not a jet one atleast.
If u pilot a fucking cesna is like driving a sienna or kia...
@@Eluxivo clearly you are an expert, and a superior human…or maybe just an air brake yourself?
The only brakes I know on Sukhoi are the little platform that goes up in the middle of the airplane to reduce aerodynamics ( and speed) or the small parachute that usually is used when landing.
I can't see them on this video so... This RUclipsr is wrong!
Air brakes, duh! 🙄
Such dumbos, air brakes
"One sec" *switches to guns* "WHAT ARE YOU DOING MAV?!?!"
One of the best scenes in the movie
The image you've shown is of pugachevs cobra.
correct
Except it's not. You never see the top profile of the aircraft in the illustrations of the cobra because the cobra is 2 dimensional, unlike this maneuver.
According to the image and the guy speaking, you follow the movement of the tail, not pitch down
You should mention it’s beneficial to do it because it hides the heat from the winder and it’s difficult to determine what way he will go when he pulls out. Plus it’s mostly an Air Show move anyway 😏🖖🏼🇺🇸
Yessss .the legendary starscream maneuver
Still remember it from transformers
🔥🔥🔥💥💯
“Sorry Skipper.
I just fouled our cockpit.”
So presents a easy slow target for enemy missile lock and guns?
No one really uses it in combat anyway.
It's an aerobatic stunt, not an air combat maneuver
In reality: It loses speed, turns and get immediately hit by a sidewinder.
You just gave the pilot a clear shot at the hole ✈️
Still cool though
cool air show manouver
Omg That shit won’t matter when a Aim-120 is approaching to your exact position
Don't matter if you have a a Aim 120 when the Russians can shot a Vympel R37M and destroy your jet 200km before you can launch yours 😅
You have ever seen one of those little monsters?
@@Eluxivo dude you need to stop raising for the Su57, It’s a dogshit plane made out of ebay metal parts Cmon
@@Eluxivo the R37 would fail to fire due to poor maintenance and missing internal components, that were sold off by corrupt soldiers. also your having a totally separate conversation then the comment that your responding to.
@@Eluxivo just cause it has a long range doesn't mean it's going to track. The 200km range is for big heavy targets like refuelers, b-52s and AWACs. Firing that missile against a maneuverable fighter and thinking it's gonna it is classic russian copium lmfao
Russia went 0-2 with their missiles vs a British plane what? A month ago? That's just embarrassing.
I swear, anyone named with Anatoly means he is a badass.
That's the part where Bill an Ted jumped out of the phone booth jamming air guitar singing "TOTALLY EXCELLENT!!"!
Looks great on film an at aerobatic shows but would do little good in battle.
It’s like driving a Supra on the sky😈
god, i hope your trolling
I'm gonna name my kid Anatoly ... Anatolis always seem to be crazy ass awesome people
When you bleed all your energy for that maneuver in reality , you will get full appreciation from the missile with direct kiss in your face.
RIP Kvochur🫡
Also called “a air show manoeuvre” since west jets don’t need dogfight to swipe out entire squadron of mig and su jets
Mig-29 can easily take out a F-14
@@Sayushiriii if it catch it In dogfight? Maybe
But poor poor guy in mig won’t even know when he died 🤭
@@Sayushiriiithe aim 54c in question: 🗿
west jet or american jets? European jet have incredible maneuverability, unlike american which basically a flying brick who can't survive without the support of awacs
@@Matt0izef22, f16 and f18 would like to know your location
The pilot added "The Falling Leaf" to that Bell Maneuver
It's alwys impressive
How to bleed off all of your energy as quickly as possible so that the adversary has an easy missile shot on you.
At that speed you might as well just use guns too 😂
i think if you do that on full speed you will definitely lose some wings
You couldnt do it at full speed at all
اهم شيء ان لايخرج شيأ فيزياوي ترى الفيزياء لم ترحم😢❤
Hahaha se até o Maverick ficou impressionado com a manobra, quer dizer que o cara era bom mesmo!!!
Never heard of Kvochur not only that I have heard it called the flying leaf for 2 decades. And the "tail slide" is called the cobra
We have an expert here I see
If you paid attention to the video you'll have noticed he described the tailslide, that is not the same as a cobra in any way. But even worse is that you say Kvochur's Bell is called the flying leaf, while the flying leaf most definitely isn't an official name for a maneuver, just try looking it up, and the falling leaf which I guess you meant is something wildly different
I have said it and again and again Russians have the best machines and the best engineers in the world forget the propaganda from the west.
Like what?
Sure bud. I bet you think UFOs are from outer space.
Meanwhile, F-15. All kill no deaths against soviets.
Supermaneuverability was first studied by the US and a swedish jet in the 60s was the first to be Supermaneuverable.
Russian have had great minds but the US has technilogical dominance. The F-22 is only rivaled by the F-35.
Looks like you've never heard of Germany before.
An interesting fact, it was swedish air force saab 35 draken who first discovered and performed the first cobra maneuver long before Russia's pugachev.
That girl saved her sibling’s lives. All my hope that they all find some semblance of normalcy.
Americans should be respectful enough to learn the correct way to pronounce foreign names.
It's the Russians fault for using Latin characters then picking entirely wrong sounds to use with them. Chinese did this too with pinyin.
That AI not an American. When Russians can properly pronounce Willy Wonka, you can get back to us.
Why? let's say it was a Japanese, Chinese or Indian person, their type of name pronunciation is different and complicated, you can't simply force someone to pronounce their name in their mother tongue, the only thing you should do is respect it.
Has anyone noticed why is the enemy plane Japanese
It's the Russian hammer and sickle emblem for the soviet Union and they mostly use sukhoi and mig jets only :)
@@USAFTHUNDERBIRD lol look it up 🤣🤣🤣
@Combat_Aviator obvs doesn't have the hammer and sickle but it's what is placed on the red star. Clearly you don't know fighter planes in certain countries 🤣!
Its a SU-57 with fake nation markings. Its better than Top Gun 1 where it was black-painted f5s
@@nickson_2024 The Soviet Union used a red star with white outline for its marking, with the russian federation using the same star with a line of blue added to make the star wit with the Russian flag and colors. Plus MIGs and Sus were exported to many countries, and are the most exported aircraft, by number of buyers, in the world. So that does not mean they are Soviet planes. Plus the SU-57 is the new Russian super-plane so for minor propoganda purposes they want to show a near half-century outdated naval aircraft blow them up with its cannon.
thrust vectoring defying the gravity
this move looks like a nightmare for the maintenance team
The Soviets also devoloped a manuever where they would hang the plane in midair with the tail down and the nose up , using the engine thrusts to keep the plane "standing" there . The plane would momentarily disappear from an opponents radar . The Soviet pilot would do this in a thick cloud if possible . The opposing pilot would also loose visual sight of the Soviet plane . Than the Soviet plane would have the element of surprise to sneak up on the opposing pilot . Pretty tricky .
По законам физики он не должен исчезгуть с радаров, не пишите чушь
Buff pup is cute and funny as well as breed-able.
15 апреля 2024 года ушел из жизни выдающийся российский летчик-испытатель Анатолий Квочур. Он освоил и испытал более 90 типов и модификаций летательных аппаратов. Его общий налет превышает 5 000 часов, в т. ч. испытательный налет - свыше 3 500 часов. За карьеру летчика-испытателя установил 11 мировых рекордов по стандартам Международной авиационной федерации, из которых 5 по состоянию на 15 апреля 2024 г. - действующие. Продолжал летать на сверхзвуковых самолетах до 65 лет. 16 апреля ему бы исполнилось 72 года.
Царствие ему небесное. Настоящий человек небес.
It's a spectacular maneuver to watch but in actuality it couldn't fool the missile.
doing this while free bird playing
That move is nice