If you like seeing trash police work exposed, watch this video! judge Fleischer Exposes Racial Profiling! Being Black is NOT Probable Cause! ruclips.net/video/Cu2pEjp2LKI/видео.html
@@d.a.n.3086I think you're looking down, instead of looking up. He said that about the "workshop" to let the cops and the prosecutors know that he's not going to just rubber stamp their foolishness on racial profiling. And that's why the next day in court the prosecutors dropped that silly case of trying to grind that man through the mill. There's not going to be any "workshop". The judge was making a point.
The point where this nonsense needs to stop is the DA’s office. They need to have the guts to say to the police “This is not enough for us to file a charge.”
Exactly. While the cop my write a vague report it is the DAs office who should screen out the BS. This is the second case with judge I've seen like this.
They didn't even have how fast he was traveling! 6 months and $2k fine for doing, what... 3 over the limit? 30 over? While doing u-turns, which... how fast can you possibly go and complete 2 u-turns?
Facing: 6 months in jail…and a $2000 ‘fine’? As the ‘Officer’: Keeps on harassing, incarcerating and forcing financial burdens on the honest citizens. While he or she faces no consequences for false charges…wages lost and possibly a job or jobs lost. Ah yes…The ‘Justice’ system.
Just IMAGINE the stress this guy has been put through, thinking he might go to jail and be ruined - he just stands there quietly like it's normal. Absolutely deserves better.
No. Most of the time, these charges pay off. Defendant usually pleas out, pays fines and/or supervised probation (never meeting a parole officer) for a year, and it more than pays for the proceeding. Judge Fleischer is a former criminal defense attorney, so his perspective is different (fair). But this "loss" by the Harris County DA is like not winning on a stolen scratch off lottery ticket.
Think of how much revenue is being made by pulling people over for being "suspicious"? They won't stop, there is too much money in finding ways to destroy people lives.
This judge is one of the very few that knows what is going on out on the streets. He is probably appointed, so the person that appointed him is also fed up with the “system” as well. Clogging that same “system” with cases that are nothing but cash grabs undermines the very fabric of justice. Cops should be very thankful that true Equity is not being practiced.
He actually did try to say something, the judge shhh'd him. You should see the one when the judge was going through a similar scenario with another man, and after talking with the prosecutor and seeing no PC, the man started to say something, Judge said "shhh, are you losing?"
@@MetalMann-de3xi I was going to mention that video. The judge was like "I've got you, don't say anything". Best to let the judge do the talking in that scenario.
If he was driving at an unsafe speed, why didn't the officer write a ticket for speeding? Instead he arrested him for "eluding". Seems like the cop was fishing and thought he caught one. Sometimes they jump out of the boat.
so the cop starts following him because of the speed and doesn't make an attempt to stop him. The guy pulls over and the cop drives past, then the cop sees that they guy made a u-turn, presumeably in his rear-view mirror, and that's why the guy got cited? That whole thing sounds like bullshit
He went ".5 miles before pulling over" is not far. That can be less than 30 seconds on a highway and a minute on street. It may be a few seconds before a person realizes they're being pulled over. I'm sure this wasn't the reason why the fleeing law was created. We need to stop wasting resources and criminalizing people with laws meant for something more serious.
And traffic law states to pull over in an area that is deemed safe. So the driver may have continued until he found a safe area, like one that is well lit.
It appears from the cop’s own report the gentleman drove through a dark, unlit carpark before stopping. Thus, one can only assume he stopped in a better lit area. As you are instructed to do. Maybe he was looking for an address, maybe even looking for a dealer, but nothing in the officer’s report indicates anything criminal happened, except the possibility of excessive speed. No statement about failure to indicate turns, that the u-turn was against local laws etc. not to mention, no record of what specific speed the driver was going, and how much it may or may not have exceeded the posted speed limit.
We've got a judge who openly questions whether the traffic stop was racially motivated, and a prosecutor who openly agrees that he came to court seeking to indict a man in a case with no probable cause for the arrest. Sounds like a civil rights lawsuit is in order.
Love this judge. This isn’t the first time he’s called out a bs DWB charge. It’s a shame this kind of thing still happens, but it’s nice to see an honest judge not allowing it to upend someone’s life.
Unfortunately there havent been any state wide office holding democrats in Texas in several decades….. im sure this democratic judge would make an excellent governor.
The crime rate is lower than it was 10 years ago. You people believe whatever propaganda the media puts in front of you. A bunch of people got mad and burned down a police station and all of a sudden there's a "crime wave" that doesnt actually exist. Its like how they're trying to frame Luigi Mangione as a terrorist. Its all propaganda to get you to stay in line. And youre a bunch of cucks who just take it.
Pathetic harassment by the officer. Until the officer turns on his lights the driver can do anything he wants including trying to lose the officer by making turns, turning off his lights, turning around or any other behaviors that might be suspicious. The officer has no right to even turn on the lights until he violates a law. Once the lights come on, half a mile isn't a long distance to travel, even if the officer believes he could've stopped earlier. Stopping him without a violation of some kind should result in consequences for the officer. Arresting him without a violation or any broken laws should result in the driver being awarded damages and the officer put under review for his job. Horrible policing.
@@realkingtv7885 I agree this is an absolute abuse of power and the officer should be punished for wasting this man's time. But to say the judge knows the officer's race is absurd. There are hundreds of officers in Houston and the judge definitely doesn't know each ones race. Statistically, he was probably white, but maybe not. I'm a white, overnight uber driver. This has me parked in suspicious areas late at night. I regularly have officers of every race approach me. A white officer cost me 45 minutes because I was in a high crime area and he wanted to search my empty car even after I showed I just dropped off a passenger. He could easily see nothing was in plain sight to give him probable cause for a search. It was overzealous policing trying to find a crime without evidence one had been committed. Not everything is about racism.
@@wilson2455 The 10th Judicial Circuit of Polk County has a few misdemeanor Judges. Sadly, one would not make a difference in Judd's "press conferences." I live in Lakeland, Florida. In the heart of Polk County. Crazy how he can get on TV and presume guilt without a conviction while at the same time, denying body cams for his deputies.
@@billygoat892 most cases would never see the inside of a courtroon as Grady has 'prejudiced/tainted the court' with his 3 Ring Circus acts. I'm sure this judge would love a 1:1 with Grady.
Cops should have to be in court and explain themselves every time they put someone in cuffs. Then if no probable cause is found, the cop should be arrested and charged with kidnapping and false imprisonment.
@@bobh9492when you have no punishment..... But you have a set of rules that you're supposed to follow..... What would be the point in those rules? Qualified immunity has destroyed people's lives and no consequences to those who did it. What about the guy that was facing a murder charge and an officer purposefully ignored evidence..... Right down to a key witness saying "that's not the shooter"
the prosecutor didn't admit anything -- the judge asked for the police officer to clarify things and tell how fast the guy was speeding -- the cop probably told the prosecutor "I can't recall" or some other nonsense -- so the prosecutor knew the judge wouldn't accept the answer -- so the prosecutor had no choice but to dismiss the case -- he knew if the cop came to court the judge would have chewed him out
They deserve nothing. Their job is not to automatically prosecute anyone by a report from a police officer. They should've read the report, understand that it's sketchy at best, just like the immediately judge did, check with the cop and reach the conclusion that there's nothing there and drop it before bothering the courts with this BS.
When the process is the punishment, the police have no concern about whether the charges get dismissed. The slogan "you may beat the charge, but you can't beat the ride" is not referencing the trip to the jail. Until there is personal, substantial consequence there will be no change. We all know this. The cost of actual deterrence has to be high. Take speeding... we know it's wrong. We do it anyways because the costs don't outweigh the benefit. We know enforcement is low and, when caught, the personal impact is minimal. M*rder? Different story. Violating rights is just the cop version of speeding. They know enforcement is few and far between and, when caught, the personal impact is non-existant. When the attitude is "go ahead and sue me" there is an obvious lack of deterrence and fear of consequences of court decisions. When you see body worn video of police cowering behind cruisers as lead flies around them, there is an obvious fear of immediate consequences. I have my opinion as to which is more effective deterrent value.
By dismissing even after taking this to court, prosecutor does not chalk this up to a loss so he can brag about conviction numbers and this does not go down as a loss.
I absolutely LOVE this judge! Calls it right down the middle following the law! He dont give a crap what race or nationality you are and THATS EXACTLY how it should be! The law has no race or nationality!
This misses the point that the DA determines prima facie if the case should even be presented and pursued. Blind Freddy, much less a lawyer, should see the holes in this case. "Suspicion" is not a crime and the charge was Eluding, not Speeding. Notwithstanding, the OR did not categorise the speeding offence as x miles over. Incompetence and BS
@artificiallysweetend the charge was eluding...eluding from what!? You can't elude for a no crime. As the judge said, anything illegal with that...the answer was NO!!
@boybawang1981 @boybawang1981 thanks for paraphrasing my comment. I covered there being no crime (because suspicion is not a crime). Therefore, everything following the driver stopping, turning and 'eluding' is irrelevant
Kudos on the judge for listening to the report and recognizing there was no legal justification for the stop much less the prosecution, but I am curious if he does this for non-poc defendants. The only cases I have seen that feature him have been black males.
What a bloody good judge….. total waste of court time… The only cop in The World that can read the speed of a vehicle with his eyes…. I think that deserves a mention in the Guinness Book Of Records…. A medical marvel.
Our legal system would be improved - if arresting officers had a financial penalty for false positive ticketing - and arrests. That would mean that every person brought before a judge should be a slam dunk - rather than cooking a pot of pasta - and throwing it against a wall to see what sticks or not. Lack of accountability for sloppy policework is a huge problem.
They shouldn't have time to ring the officer he should have filled his report improperly. As a matter of fact the officer should be in court then the judge can sentence him
Never hear a cop warned re his conduct and lying on statements. These DAs should be sacked for lying and malicious prosecution. Jail them for Perjury. Funny how it takes two to take on one citizen. Dismissal dos not go against the DAs office and it should has the person has being charged and forced to attend a Court.
Black men aren't children. They don't need protection. This man just had a good judge that knew the law. I swear most black women need to learn grown ass men don't need protection. These men barely want to protect YOU when shit hits the fan. In fact, they kill people that look like YOU at more of an alarming rate; more than any other race of man does to their own race of woman. They would victimize someone like you first before a police officer would to them. Know who needs the true protection from whom in this community.
This judge isn't giving cops the rubber stamp. I respect him because he knows what's going on. This will force police to do their job better or face some consequences (hopefully).
I'm white, and my girlfriend is black. I pretty much never get pulled over; maybe twice in 15 years. She gets pulled over at least five times a year, usually for 'random' DUI checks. She doesn't drink, so once she passes the tests, then the questions start, trying to trip her up into admitting something/anything.
The judge must live like a saint, otherwise the police union would dig up dirt to use against him. They absolutely hate it when politicians or judges use the taboo reference “driving while black”. Americas favorite ignorance, racism.
The sad truth is that we see this as being the abnormal. When in fact, this judge is what we should expect.As the normal, the probable cause should be set to an extremely high standard.
These traitors to freedom show up in court, with no evidence and no probable cause expecting high Sentences but refusing to provide high level quality of service
Wow. The officer didn’t even bother to state how fast the defendant was going. Even though he was supposedly speeding. Yet the defendant has to come to court based on a half ass report from the officer. This was harassment.
I remember a well documented organization in the 1940s that had a lot of people that committed heinous crimes against humanity and all in the name of following orders.
If you like seeing trash police work exposed, watch this video! judge Fleischer Exposes Racial Profiling! Being Black is NOT Probable Cause!
ruclips.net/video/Cu2pEjp2LKI/видео.html
HE doesn't care, he wants to "start" a workshop so they can help the police, CYA. He's gutless for not reporting.
@@d.a.n.3086I think you're looking down, instead of looking up. He said that about the "workshop" to let the cops and the prosecutors know that he's not going to just rubber stamp their foolishness on racial profiling. And that's why the next day in court the prosecutors dropped that silly case of trying to grind that man through the mill. There's not going to be any "workshop". The judge was making a point.
How about some consequences for the idiot cops who are wasting the court's time with these bogus cases???
Exactly.
How about driving sensibly
Unfortunately that will never occur
@@gowdsake7103 What in the report leads you to believe he wasn't driving sensibly?
Elect a different attorney general
Yet another cop who needs to have ALL of his traffic stops investigated.
The point where this nonsense needs to stop is the DA’s office. They need to have the guts to say to the police “This is not enough for us to file a charge.”
Exactly. While the cop my write a vague report it is the DAs office who should screen out the BS. This is the second case with judge I've seen like this.
And people still thunk if you are doing anything wrong you have nothing to fear
They didn't even have how fast he was traveling! 6 months and $2k fine for doing, what... 3 over the limit? 30 over? While doing u-turns, which... how fast can you possibly go and complete 2 u-turns?
Facing:
6 months in jail…and a $2000 ‘fine’?
As the ‘Officer’:
Keeps on harassing, incarcerating and forcing financial burdens on the honest citizens. While he or she faces no consequences for false charges…wages lost and possibly a job or jobs lost.
Ah yes…The ‘Justice’ system.
Just IMAGINE the stress this guy has been put through, thinking he might go to jail and be ruined - he just stands there quietly like it's normal. Absolutely deserves better.
One judge that actually follows and knows the Law. He sees through cops Bull crap.
Cops lie and embellish reports
One.
One
Most judges are like that. But they don't get the attention like the bad seeds do.
@@snowflakehunter They're really not. Most judges are local bosses who work with police and prosecutors to impose their will over the local community.
Made the man show up and probably miss work for a BS stop 🤷♂️🤦♂️
Exactly as the cop planned. They know the punishment is in the process.
Pos cops 👮♂️
It happened to me
Think of how many taxpayer dollars were wasted by bringing these bogus cases in front of a judge...
No. Most of the time, these charges pay off. Defendant usually pleas out, pays fines and/or supervised probation (never meeting a parole officer) for a year, and it more than pays for the proceeding.
Judge Fleischer is a former criminal defense attorney, so his perspective is different (fair). But this "loss" by the Harris County DA is like not winning on a stolen scratch off lottery ticket.
Think of how much revenue is being made by pulling people over for being "suspicious"? They won't stop, there is too much money in finding ways to destroy people lives.
This judge is one of the very few that knows what is going on out on the streets.
He is probably appointed, so the person that appointed him is also fed up with the “system” as well.
Clogging that same “system” with cases that are nothing but cash grabs undermines the very fabric of justice.
Cops should be very thankful that true Equity is not being practiced.
@@krismikewillpay out, and is unjust. Bootlickers are all scumbags like all the cops they cant stop sucking off.
@@dangeary2134 Actually he is elected.
Kudos to the brotha for remaining silent, because so many people harm themselves by the need to run their mouths.
He actually did try to say something, the judge shhh'd him. You should see the one when the judge was going through a similar scenario with another man, and after talking with the prosecutor and seeing no PC, the man started to say something, Judge said "shhh, are you losing?"
@@MetalMann-de3xi I was going to mention that video. The judge was like "I've got you, don't say anything". Best to let the judge do the talking in that scenario.
@LinkRocks 💯
If he was driving at an unsafe speed, why didn't the officer write a ticket for speeding? Instead he arrested him for "eluding".
Seems like the cop was fishing and thought he caught one. Sometimes they jump out of the boat.
District Attorneys and LEOs should be held accountable for this illegal behavior.
Never ever heard of a vehicle driving in a "suspicious" manner. 😅😅😅 Wonderful judge!!!!
I don't know, Fly casual!
The vehicle was wearing a disguise.
I see it all the time. Usually cop cars. They are always up to something suspicious.
so the cop starts following him because of the speed and doesn't make an attempt to stop him. The guy pulls over and the cop drives past, then the cop sees that they guy made a u-turn, presumeably in his rear-view mirror, and that's why the guy got cited? That whole thing sounds like bullshit
When he said “Driving while black”…
You could hear a pin drop, it was so quiet in there for 5-6 secs.
INSANE WORK
(shady McCoy)
Judge summed it up. Driving while Black
He went ".5 miles before pulling over" is not far. That can be less than 30 seconds on a highway and a minute on street. It may be a few seconds before a person realizes they're being pulled over. I'm sure this wasn't the reason why the fleeing law was created. We need to stop wasting resources and criminalizing people with laws meant for something more serious.
And traffic law states to pull over in an area that is deemed safe. So the driver may have continued until he found a safe area, like one that is well lit.
It appears from the cop’s own report the gentleman drove through a dark, unlit carpark before stopping. Thus, one can only assume he stopped in a better lit area. As you are instructed to do.
Maybe he was looking for an address, maybe even looking for a dealer, but nothing in the officer’s report indicates anything criminal happened, except the possibility of excessive speed. No statement about failure to indicate turns, that the u-turn was against local laws etc. not to mention, no record of what specific speed the driver was going, and how much it may or may not have exceeded the posted speed limit.
We've got a judge who openly questions whether the traffic stop was racially motivated, and a prosecutor who openly agrees that he came to court seeking to indict a man in a case with no probable cause for the arrest. Sounds like a civil rights lawsuit is in order.
this judge is GOLD!
Kudos on you Judge Fleischer!
Love this judge. This isn’t the first time he’s called out a bs DWB charge. It’s a shame this kind of thing still happens, but it’s nice to see an honest judge not allowing it to upend someone’s life.
He asked the lawyer was it driving while black and he put his head in his papers. 😆
This judge should be running texas, the super high crime rate would actually go down.
Unfortunately there havent been any state wide office holding democrats in Texas in several decades….. im sure this democratic judge would make an excellent governor.
The crime rate is lower than it was 10 years ago. You people believe whatever propaganda the media puts in front of you. A bunch of people got mad and burned down a police station and all of a sudden there's a "crime wave" that doesnt actually exist. Its like how they're trying to frame Luigi Mangione as a terrorist. Its all propaganda to get you to stay in line. And youre a bunch of cucks who just take it.
He's arrested, charged and on the day of his court appearance, they too are fishing for probable cause. This man has it hard.
Pathetic harassment by the officer. Until the officer turns on his lights the driver can do anything he wants including trying to lose the officer by making turns, turning off his lights, turning around or any other behaviors that might be suspicious. The officer has no right to even turn on the lights until he violates a law. Once the lights come on, half a mile isn't a long distance to travel, even if the officer believes he could've stopped earlier.
Stopping him without a violation of some kind should result in consequences for the officer. Arresting him without a violation or any broken laws should result in the driver being awarded damages and the officer put under review for his job. Horrible policing.
Is it illegal to detain someone for "No Probable Cause"?
A judge who is well aware of the systemic racism in America.
sytematic racism? 🤣😂how about 14% of the population comitting 60% of the crimes ..... idiot.
Do you know what the race of the police officer was? It’s a stop without probable cause not matter the ethnicity of the parties involved.
@@bigsasha500 The judge does. Do you know better than a judge, keyboard lawyer?
More obsessed by paperwork and procedure
@@realkingtv7885 I agree this is an absolute abuse of power and the officer should be punished for wasting this man's time. But to say the judge knows the officer's race is absurd. There are hundreds of officers in Houston and the judge definitely doesn't know each ones race. Statistically, he was probably white, but maybe not.
I'm a white, overnight uber driver. This has me parked in suspicious areas late at night. I regularly have officers of every race approach me. A white officer cost me 45 minutes because I was in a high crime area and he wanted to search my empty car even after I showed I just dropped off a passenger. He could easily see nothing was in plain sight to give him probable cause for a search. It was overzealous policing trying to find a crime without evidence one had been committed.
Not everything is about racism.
Where is this guy? They should do a show like Caught in Providence with this judge.
Judge David Fleischer Court 5 Houston Texas
pretty sure Sheriff Grady wouldn't be holding so many 'trial by TV' segments if this guy was the judge !!
@@wilson2455 The 10th Judicial Circuit of Polk County has a few misdemeanor Judges. Sadly, one would not make a difference in Judd's "press conferences." I live in Lakeland, Florida. In the heart of Polk County. Crazy how he can get on TV and presume guilt without a conviction while at the same time, denying body cams for his deputies.
@@billygoat892judd is a narcissist who loves to hear himself talk
@@billygoat892 most cases would never see the inside of a courtroon as Grady has 'prejudiced/tainted the court' with his 3 Ring Circus acts. I'm sure this judge would love a 1:1 with Grady.
Cops should have to be in court and explain themselves every time they put someone in cuffs. Then if no probable cause is found, the cop should be arrested and charged with kidnapping and false imprisonment.
Nothing would work then. I get the sentiment but come on.
@@bobh9492when you have no punishment..... But you have a set of rules that you're supposed to follow..... What would be the point in those rules?
Qualified immunity has destroyed people's lives and no consequences to those who did it.
What about the guy that was facing a murder charge and an officer purposefully ignored evidence..... Right down to a key witness saying "that's not the shooter"
I love how thos judge sits listening to the charges and goes silent waiting for any real charges come out.
The judge used to be a defense attorney, so he tends to be a bit different.
Kudos to the prosecutor for admitting it was BS.
He didn't immediately drop it though. It shouldn't have reached this point.
the prosecutor didn't admit anything -- the judge asked for the police officer to clarify things and tell how fast the guy was speeding -- the cop probably told the prosecutor "I can't recall" or some other nonsense -- so the prosecutor knew the judge wouldn't accept the answer -- so the prosecutor had no choice but to dismiss the case -- he knew if the cop came to court the judge would have chewed him out
They deserve nothing. Their job is not to automatically prosecute anyone by a report from a police officer. They should've read the report, understand that it's sketchy at best, just like the immediately judge did, check with the cop and reach the conclusion that there's nothing there and drop it before bothering the courts with this BS.
When the process is the punishment, the police have no concern about whether the charges get dismissed. The slogan "you may beat the charge, but you can't beat the ride" is not referencing the trip to the jail.
Until there is personal, substantial consequence there will be no change. We all know this. The cost of actual deterrence has to be high. Take speeding... we know it's wrong. We do it anyways because the costs don't outweigh the benefit. We know enforcement is low and, when caught, the personal impact is minimal. M*rder? Different story.
Violating rights is just the cop version of speeding. They know enforcement is few and far between and, when caught, the personal impact is non-existant.
When the attitude is "go ahead and sue me" there is an obvious lack of deterrence and fear of consequences of court decisions. When you see body worn video of police cowering behind cruisers as lead flies around them, there is an obvious fear of immediate consequences. I have my opinion as to which is more effective deterrent value.
Well said, abolish qualified immunity
The judge can smell the BS a mile away!
The judge used to be a defense attorney.
The cops who do this should be fired and charged with unlawful arrest and wrongful inprisonment.
This is a judge who knows his job .......... thank you !
Right outcome, awesome judge, Shaw could have thrown a thank you out though...
Probably the best judge in the country.
I wish all judges were this good.
Arrested for trying to lose a police tail.
He is a great judge. 👍
I love this judge.
2:19 the defendant rolls his eyes so much, it's great. He's just like "I know, driving while black seems to be his reason." lmfaoooo
Throw him in jail for parking on the side of the road and making U-turns!
Cops need to start facing serious charges for violating people's rights.
If the cop had "clocked" the car going above the speed limit, why didn't he pull him over immediately? HMMMMMM
This judge is so fair and can see through lies immediately,
By dismissing even after taking this to court, prosecutor does not chalk this up to a loss so he can brag about conviction numbers and this does not go down as a loss.
They always doing this thinking they have the right to just stop you because of how you look. I would sue as soon as my case is dropped.
The court system is a joke
I thought evading the police could be seen as justification for an investigatory detention
This judge needs to go after the cops.
Well done.
Amazing judge!!!❤
The cop still gets paid. The victim has to go through all this for nothing. What a joke.
Remove this cop and prosecutor
This judge is awesome.
I’d be willing to bet good money that cops hate this judge.
That cop should be forced to pay for everyone's time
I absolutely LOVE this judge! Calls it right down the middle following the law! He dont give a crap what race or nationality you are and THATS EXACTLY how it should be! The law has no race or nationality!
I feeel sorry for ADA's who gotta present this crap to a judge!!
This misses the point that the DA determines prima facie if the case should even be presented and pursued. Blind Freddy, much less a lawyer, should see the holes in this case. "Suspicion" is not a crime and the charge was Eluding, not Speeding. Notwithstanding, the OR did not categorise the speeding offence as x miles over. Incompetence and BS
@artificiallysweetend the charge was eluding...eluding from what!? You can't elude for a no crime. As the judge said, anything illegal with that...the answer was NO!!
@boybawang1981 @boybawang1981 thanks for paraphrasing my comment. I covered there being no crime (because suspicion is not a crime). Therefore, everything following the driver stopping, turning and 'eluding' is irrelevant
I feel like this guy should be compensated for his time.
Kudos on the judge for listening to the report and recognizing there was no legal justification for the stop much less the prosecution, but I am curious if he does this for non-poc defendants. The only cases I have seen that feature him have been black males.
I’m curios to know if the officers are ever told how these probable cause hearings went.
Until the cop is put in jail for the same amount of time as suspect for falsifying records this is BS
What af joke that justice system is.
I really like this Judge.
He doesn’t tolerate sloppy police work. For the record I used to wear the blue
What a bloody good judge….. total waste of court time… The only cop in The World that can read the speed of a vehicle with his eyes…. I think that deserves a mention in the Guinness Book Of Records…. A medical marvel.
Every cop needs to be retrained.
We need HAVE A NATIONWIDE WORKSHOP THAT'S THE ISSUE
Our legal system would be improved - if arresting officers had a financial penalty for false positive ticketing - and arrests. That would mean that every person brought before a judge should be a slam dunk - rather than cooking a pot of pasta - and throwing it against a wall to see what sticks or not. Lack of accountability for sloppy policework is a huge problem.
They shouldn't have time to ring the officer he should have filled his report improperly.
As a matter of fact the officer should be in court then the judge can sentence him
Is it incompetence or perjury. Either way they should never be issued a gun and a badge, then turn them loose on the citizens.
It is disgusting you are forced to go to these hearings and the cops are not.
The judge gives the victim words of advice about dealing with the criminals🤔.
This is why I like Fleischer. He actually understands and goes by the law and precedent, and protects people, even from themselves.
Was the driver suspicious of the intent of the police officer against him?
Never hear a cop warned re his conduct and lying on statements. These DAs should be sacked for lying and malicious prosecution. Jail them for Perjury. Funny how it takes two to take on one citizen. Dismissal dos not go against the DAs office and it should has the person has being charged and forced to attend a Court.
Funny too, how it takes them months to charge themselves, but for us its right away
So straight forward
Police just wanted to harass the guy
Thanks judge
Cops deliberately sending bogus things to court should piss judges off
Great judge
How about a suspension for the cop
Never ever drive a red or pink car in Texas or you'll end up in court.
Any repercussions for the police officer involved?
Isn’t the prosecutor using heresay? Where are the cops?
Protection of this man is a must he understands
Black men aren't children. They don't need protection. This man just had a good judge that knew the law. I swear most black women need to learn grown ass men don't need protection. These men barely want to protect YOU when shit hits the fan. In fact, they kill people that look like YOU at more of an alarming rate; more than any other race of man does to their own race of woman. They would victimize someone like you first before a police officer would to them. Know who needs the true protection from whom in this community.
Good judge
Is there anything illegal about trying to get away from the cop by going in the other direction
Americans citizens need Judges like this Judge because citizens need justice from America corrupt police officers.
This judge isn't giving cops the rubber stamp. I respect him because he knows what's going on. This will force police to do their job better or face some consequences (hopefully).
I'm white, and my girlfriend is black. I pretty much never get pulled over; maybe twice in 15 years. She gets pulled over at least five times a year, usually for 'random' DUI checks. She doesn't drink, so once she passes the tests, then the questions start, trying to trip her up into admitting something/anything.
This guy is so refreshing! Just doing his job, and that outshines so many more with a title but no passion for the proper application of the law!
This judge just seems fair. But if your messing up your done.
The judge must live like a saint, otherwise the police union would dig up dirt to use against him. They absolutely hate it when politicians or judges use the taboo reference “driving while black”. Americas favorite ignorance, racism.
Common sense judge.
The sad truth is that we see this as being the abnormal. When in fact, this judge is what we should expect.As the normal, the probable cause should be set to an extremely high standard.
These traitors to freedom show up in court, with no evidence and no probable cause expecting high
Sentences but refusing to provide high level quality of service
Wow. The officer didn’t even bother to state how fast the defendant was going. Even though he was supposedly speeding. Yet the defendant has to come to court based on a half ass report from the officer. This was harassment.
Driving while black implies that the driver can change their colour as they wish. utter rubbish.
why is the cop who charged him NOT in court ??i have said this many times cop,s VERY rarely turn up for court ??
I remember a well documented organization in the 1940s that had a lot of people that committed heinous crimes against humanity and all in the name of following orders.
Love judge fleischer!!!
How many people get charged for nothing doing stupid judges except this honor.