Some have gone to extraordinary lengths to spin Vanity Fair’s latest hot take in their favour! I examine that & also the recent appointment of Clive Irving to cover the Harry Vs Murdoch court case.
Read Woman's Day Jan 20th .States Ms going to do solo tours inc Aus She thinks King C Charles had a lukewarm tour of Aus and she thinķs her tour was a resounding success, why do Msm paint the wrong information about King Cs tour Can't you do anything about stopping M
@@alenaatze7416 , it seems Megan lives in a bubble of her making where she believes all her own publicity. Initially Harry and his new wife were received well in Australia. We were glad Harry found someone, and we hoped for the best for him and his unknown wife. THEN how she behaved at Admiralty House leaked out on online forums. Does she believe WE live in a bubble too, and we wouldn't find out? In case the 17 proven lies told on the Oprah interview passed over people's heads, we have also had several years of hearing about her diva behaviour and mistruths. She won't feel welcome in Australia.
I believe that the Vanity Fair Article is pure, unadulterated Snark!!! It has shown that since leaving the Royal Family the Harkles have produced Nothing, Swat, Zero and indeed they have trashed, lied and bullied their way into the Media.
@@alenaatze7416I hope not. She just wants people to greet her like they lined up to greet KCIII and QC. I didn’t get there on time as I was working but my children aged in their 20s went and cheered and loved the crowds. No one who likes the RF would greet her. Why would she be here? Pushing a race agenda? Teaching or talking about acting? Giving parenting seminars? She has the opposite of the Midas touch.
Precisely. After all, we heard him asking on camera how do you explain to people that you curtesy to your grandmother. I don't know, maybe he should have gotten pointers from his aunt who curtsied to her mum to the end of the queen's life.
What has really bothered me with the mainstream press in the US and the UK is how they have allowed M to get away with how she has treated her father. No matter what our opinion of Thomas Markle Sr fact is M owes her father everything. He was the present parent during her childhood, he raised her as a single father, he paid for all her private education. He was owed at the very minimum respect for all the sacrifices he made for his daughter and the press should have never allowed her to get away with the cruel way she treated that man.
As horrible as this may sound, it's nobody else's business! It is between her and her father. It's only social media subs who want her punished. Also, as annoying and cringy H&M can be and yes they are tone deaf and see themselves as far more important than they actually are, they haven't broken any Laws as yet. 😬
@@kerrylennox7359 I entirely disagree on the it's nobody else's business, she made it very public by leaking(imo) that "Dear Daddy" letter to humiliate her father and toss him under the bus.
@@kerrylennox7359Why do you think M would be punished by Thomas Sr being defended in his role as single parent, provider and protector who raised M by himself while working as an award winning Lighting Director? How would that 'punish' M?
@@kerrylennox7359 I have to say I agree. I'm very much not a fan of MM but her relationship with her father shouldn't be tabloid fodder. Difficult family dynamics/relationships are painful for everyone involved and I don't see how the media talking about it is beneficial to anyone.
There's enough video and picture evidence of her being quiet- aggressive. In one of the Netflix videos, there was a scene where Harry was looking like a real simp and she was saying "It is YOUR brother." How she said it, it was very cutting of Harry. Also there's the pictures in Jamaica when she crashed Skip's wedding. You can see her clenched jaw and teeth while talking to the waiter. There's many more in her interviews as well, when her mask slips off. I can always believe the bullying stories about her.
There are so many instances of cameras catching her mask in a state of slippage.😉 Especially memorable was the time her mother had the audacity to interrupt her. Markle's face was like thunder as she whipped her head around and glared at her mother. I also give you "HAND" as evidence of her domineering behaviour. Vanity Fair seems to be a little too soft in their exposé of the tyrant that is Markle.
@ant_yw4934 once this circus is all over I hope we get to concentrate on true villains. MeAgain and Harry have been so easy to spot that they have opened my eyes to traits in others.
I've signed an NDA for my previous high profile celebrity employers and there's no expiry date on there. So not sure how true that is. Obviously, each contract can be different
This has highlighted that specific type of bullying that makes you feel like you're going mad. You question yourself and that's how they trap you. It's far more insidious than someone shouting and barking. This is why she's so dangerous. People need to keep calling this manipulative cow out. Harry is just as culpable as an enabler.
The UK staff said Harry yelled at them and one was abused over the telephone by Harry He was as bad and when William fronted him about it he started yelling at him Thats when Harry ended in the dog bowl. Harry didn't stick up for his little niece...that tells you everything.
I agree - it's over for Vanity Fair, People, town and country, US weekly, Vogue and Netlix who have been the propoganda machines for the dubious duo. Still to this day they are doing it. Shame on them all!
I'm absolutely not buying Lady C's line that Vanity Fair are now savouring a dish of satisfyingly ice-cold revenge for which they have waited long patient years. This is simply opportunistic - they are doing whatever they can to get readers, just as they always have, and now the wind seems to be blowing against M rather than with her, they've suddenly found a small amount of cautious courage.
Agree, and do you still follow Lady C? She also grifted our desire for the true and had us following her 2023 under the premise on the big reveal in spring 2024….and was her book that reveled nothing. Just exploiting 😂
I can't listen to Lady C anymore. She acts like she knows so much knowledge from sources in the palace, but everything she's said never happened or wasn't correct. She kept saying the truth about the kids would be out. She said last Spring it would come out, then it was Summer, then Fall, etc. LOL I just think she's all gossip.
Yanky Wally tried to tell everyone, and we all know what Harry and Meghan did to Wally. I'd like to see them try and take you down, corner an Aussie and they'll find out what we are made of. Enjoyed your reporting, thank you.
Just look at what happened to ashli / danja zone both her and her mothers house was deliberately set on fire with Ashley's cat being killed she had such a bad time of it god rest her soul
Evidently she was caught creeping around Royal residences taking photos and mapping things out. Photographing the children sleeping etc. This was not just an offensive thing to do regarding the family but was a huge security risk. That is why I think the Queen got rid of her.
It was after the wedding. They were living at Kensington Palace in apartments that were renovated (for millions) and that the Glouster's moved out of to allow H and MM to occupy. Prince William caught her and that was it-- they were dispatched to Frogmore Cottage. A diamond bracelet that HLMQE lent to Catherine had also disappeared. MM is dangerous and she's more than a loose cannon. The RF are the ones who need security, not traitor H and his unstable (imo) wife
It was after the wedding. They were living in Kensington Palace in renovated (for millions) apartments that the Glouster's left to allow H and MM to occupy. Prince William caught M snooping around and that was it-- they were dispatched to Frogmore Cottage. A diamond bracelet belonging to QEII, that had been lent to Princess Catherine, had also gone missing. MM and H are dangerous and unbalanced in my opinion. The RF--especially the Wales'--need extra security for their protection from those two.
She is a dangerous person in my opinion. Getting pictures of the kids is sick. That's predatory behaviour. Trying to sell those I would assume. Horrible. I heard she did steal things too. I don't put it past her since she stole clothing and shoes from Suits' wardrobe and commercial photoshoot (Reitmans). I think she got kicked out and that's why her and Haz went crazy after the monarchy. Just like a toddler having a tantrum. LOL
I think the 1st time Harry told Meghan what to do was the last. When he told her twice to turn around on the balcony, the look on her face said , harry youre going to pay for that.
I think to a degree Nutmeg is dangerous. In the sense her ego is not going to go away quietly, and she will take everyone down with her. We know she holds no allegiance, and we know she has a bitter, mean girl side to her. At this time ,who does she have left fighting her corner. So what does she have to lose.
You only have to look at her PR for the last 5 years and who trolls on her behalf, the attacks on people speaking against them, including journalists and RUclipsrs. Her destructive behaviour has already hurt a lot of people.
Meghan has control of Harry's (alleged) children. If she is narcissistic, she is more concerned with her own needs instead of her children. She can do a lot of damage. Who knows what she is like as a parent? She may be the best parent on the planet. We just don't know.
@cherfromtn8225 which leads me to think she is not a great mom. IF they exist, then I have no doubt that Dimbo thinks he is doing the best by them of keeping them safe under a cloak of anonymity. ( I would argue that this course is only putting them in more danger). But Nutmeg has not given any sign of being a caring mother. And judging from the way she treats anybody that is in any way close to her, I don't hold out much hope that they would be her priority. The more she sees people around her, not only deserting her, but turning against her, how is she going to be able to channel or even make sense of what she sees as betrayal. If those children are real, then I would suggest now is the time for the RF to intervene in some way. But this is what leans me more into them, either nonexistent or some other reason for the RF not to have any concern for them. Either way. I think there's a huge storm on the horizon
I wish someone knew what happened to the little Guy.
10 дней назад
Well if I were to venture a guess, some trauma. I’ve worked with animals in various capacities for 4 decades and two front legs being operated on simultaneously is rare. Beagles typically don’t have hip and elbow diseases but even then vets prefer one surgery at a time. Injuries like that are commonly found from abuse (thrown out of a car, thrown from a second or third story window, even mean nasty teenage boys) or just by being loose and being hit by a car. I’m not suggesting anything. I’m just speaking from my experience.
Something came up on Kinsey S this morning she had some information about the Pasadena walk through. Apparently all the volunteers had to ‘take 15’ when they arrived so the only people there at the time was their team and the paps.
We haven't heard whisperings of the next faux royal tour for a while. Maybe the Crown did some preemptive work or maybe they are too separate or Harry had enough taking the backseat to her "Highness".
Unfortunately, the people who own newspapers don't invest in the type of journalism that uncovered Watergate, but even then, look at the threats the Washington Post faced over publishing the Pentagon Papers.
Oh, that curtsey! He had a nasty little smirk on his face, when she did it! I think he relished the thought of making his family and their traditions look ridiculous!
So dis I. And the bit where she crossed the road and tried to get in front of Prince William. She had to be firmly escorted back to her side. Then she wouldn't let go of the flowers. She was always a nightmare, imo.
Logic always prevails with your analysis, so thanks Shauna!! The amount of money those two have wasted on PR must be colossal but to no avail! From RUclipsrs like you, to journalists like Camilla Tominey, you are brave to call them & dubious reports out.
Vanity Fair should realise that the piece is NOT news. Many will not be heavily invested in reading the article because it’s just a repeat of what everyone already knows. Not saying that the article doesn’t deserve any attention, but if they really want ground breaking content, only one word: MEGNANCY.
VF just deserting the sinking ship like all the other Hollywood types. Such genuine folks that they are. I notice Daniela Elser has switched sides too. Not that she’s Hollywood but she sure WAS a sugar.
@@Jude-y3p she used to write some VERY pro M and H pieces.. she’s slowly done quite a turn around, but that doesn’t mean that tomorrow she won’t come out with some pro Harkle nonsense and have a go at William and Catherine. I think it all depends what side of bed she gets out of or what way she thinks the wind is blowing.
5am here in the UK! I like Camilla she says it as it is. One day the whole truth might come out but I won’t hold my breath! Meanwhile keep up the good work exposing lazy journalists 😊
Yes, the papers, editors, owners, politicians, police do need to be shown their accountability. However, truth is 'once the horse has bolted there is no need to shut the gate'. Too little, too late, Harry.
It's never too late to hold Murdoch's feet to the fire. The heinous things Murdoch's editors did to ordinary people are unforgivable, this issue isn't about Harry.
@claudiamcallister Of course he will come prepared. He will have learned from his past mistakes and listened to counsel from people with experience. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I think this is where I would insert “PMSL”.
Based on the dozens of witness statements he submitted which were chucked out by the judge because they contained only opinion instead of facts, I don't think either H or (more surprisingly) his legal team seem to understand what they are supposed to be doing.
Harry was hacked much less than William and also Catherine. So compensation was in respect of this. William gave all his compensation to Invictus games.
I have an uneasy feeling that he would not have give it all to charity, unlike William who gave it alll to charity and mostly to Invictus, Harry’s charity. I might be doing him an injustice in saying that.
Precisely! He was offered a payout and refused it because he thought he was entitled to receive the same amount as William even though Harry was barely hacked.
William and Catherine hacked over 165 times. Harry 6....there is NO way Harry deserved the same settlement. And it was William who fought this case and won. Harry didn't want any part of it then. As usual Horrid Harry desperate to make it about him now.. He needs to stfu...he has used the Press to lie and print all his slurs and defamations against the RF that have proven to be utterly untrue .
I moved in with a boyfriend years ago. His best mate lived there too. When my boyfriend wasn’t there the best mate would say the most horrible things to me. When I tried to tell my boyfriend he thought I was making it up. It was terrible.
@@67oldcoach I got dumped by a guy for another guy at university. My ego took a bit of a beating because my replacement was a greasy little weasel. Hopefully not like me at all.
Sorry you had to go through that Shauna. I totally believe you. My mom told me to use the fact that I had hearing damage in one ear to deal with such people. "Could you speak up, that's my bad ear" or the kicker " just write it down, I'm not hearing you properly". Great fun that.
it was not fawning coverage, it was a passive-aggressive take down, so they can defend themselves either way if there is a lawsuit. But they really covered a lot of ground and in the end explained why these two will never find success.
Amen Shauna! I never thought Harry was bothered by Meghan's "curtsy" one bit. In fact, to me, he was smirking. He loves the way she behaves towards his family because she's his weapon. The only weapon he has.
I too remember Vanity when Dominick Dunne existed. What a great magazine. I would send it to my children at Uni because they couldn't afford it. Journalism at its greatest.
Just woken up at an early for me, 5:15am and there you are Shauna ❤ snuggled up. Warm and cosy listening to your dulcet tones. Lovely way to start the day. Harry in court again, yawn yawn, he is in court more often than he is in Montecito
Harry in Court again? Yes - at taxpayers expense - I hope the idiot lose & drops all his other "revenge" cases! Sick of Judas continuing to try & benefit at Pa & the UK taxpayers expense! Greedy LFG!
Shauna, you’re the bomb! To me he’s trying to prove he’s better than his brother. He’s obsessed with his rank within the family. If he wins he’ll be able to say Prince William didn’t have what it takes. He doesn’t understand that he was only a stepping stone to William. MM thought she was irresistible, hence Princess Catherine is the enemy!
Well said Shauna, keep it up, call them all out, I agree. Vanity Fair is too late, we already know all this, nothing new, they need to find some breaking news, something we do not know, now that would be a story.
Sorry you're dealing with that crap. Narc bosses are a great challenge. The best thing to do is keep a detailed diary on how you're treated by him/her and what was said, date, time, etc...of the events. It will pay off in the end. Keep calm and carry on! P.S. study how narcs operate. This will help, too.
My mom does this too. She very conversationally says absolutely destroying things and then acts "shocked" if anyone is upset, because we are just too "sensitive." She also had her outbursts that were a true shout, screaming fit with fists throwing too when I was younger, and I suspect against my poor sick dad in his final years.
I want to know how he got injured? Two broken legs and he was a older dog even then. When he was in the trailer for her new show he was on the dog bed all white in the face. She gave him a treat. He had been gone since Oct. When was the trailer made that he was still alive? And on the Christmas card both the beagles were young, no white faces on either dog? Odd When was that picture taken? Did the kids ride a bus to school and M and H were waiting for the bus to drop them off at the drive? It is all so odd. So many lies
Meghan also thanked the staff of the Toronto veterinary hospital who treated and cared for Guy the beagle while he was recovering for the surgery on his broken legs. It was also stated in Harrys book the pair of them travelled each evening to Surrey to visit Guy who was under the care of Noel Fitzpatrick, treating the dog for broken legs. Huh?🤔
It was from 5 years ago, goes to show you how the Harkles are so devious. We now see how desperate they are. Hopefully Sharon Stone will put out a statement in reference to it being said years ago. It no longer stands.
Vanity Fair used to be my favorite magazine. Then, Graydon Carter retired as editor, and it all went to hell. Very sad,as this publication has a long and revered history in the world of publishing, but they've dumbed it down so much, I'd rather read Us Weekly.
I think that Harry looked uncomfortable, when Meghan did that horrible curtsey, was only because he figured that everyone that loved Queen Elizabeth would eat that mock curtsey up, and not because it was the wrong thing to do.
I think he was embarrassed, and that was a nervous smirk. I don’t want to defend the indefensible, but we know what she’s like, and he is weak and scared of her, especially in those early days, and if she insisted that curtsey be included he would have gone along with her even if he knew it was wrong. No excuse, but she probably took control of the whole show.
The main reason this is a top tier go to channel is Shauna’s ability to put together the facts and at the same time put aside feelings. We don’t have enough of that anywhere. Whether MSM or RUclips and other independent creators.
@@DeAnn_Texas_America similar situation at work with a director ( nickname the tyrant troll). Lawyer's advice - ask that every instruction be put in writing. If the person refuses to comply, you can then record them stating this is to clarify your orders. May not be legal in other countries. Most lawyers will give a free 15 minute consultation. Unsurprisingly, once lawyers and recording were mentioned, the tyrant conveniently "retired".
Hi Shauna. I know from some of your past comments that you have no love or respect for Rupert Murdoch (a view that I share, BTW), so I truly hope that this will not influence or bias your coverage of Harry's court case. That would amount to spin on your account, but I'm sure you will report without fear or favour.
@barrymorkell in my any ways Rupert Murdoch was a decent man and he came from a very honourable and decent family himself ,the best ! The much bigger concern is the family he is leaving behind to run the show There are factions within (not the head fortunately ) which could be threatening and dangerous The last court case within the family which he lost is very worrying I think
Thank you for reminding people that Vanity Fair once had proper, serious journalism and journalists. Dominick Dunne! Michael Wolff! Christopher Hitchens! Would love to hear the late, great Hitchens take on those two parasites.
Harry had disgust on his face when old Meg did that ridiculous curtsy. It wasn't disgust for Meg it was disgust for his upbringing country and culture. A big middle finger to his family. A smug middle finger to all of the commonwealth.
Harry looked at her kind of like ‘look at my wife, ain’t she grand’. He is too stupid in my opinion to think deeply about that performance of the bow which was all about Meghan thinking she is so entertaining ad above his beloved grandmother.
EXACTLY!! And after the LA Fires & seeing what they did and the backlash towards Harry & Meghan was just the icing and cherry on top. I think they just decided that there was no way to ignore this. After this last bit from H&M, I think Vanity Fair decided to quit helping. It's possible that some people at Vanity Fair personally knows some of the people in LA. Maybe someone they knew passed away as a result of LA Fires. Either way, Vanity Fair needs Hollywood more than Hollywood needs them. Plus, many high profile actors were helping others without the PR Photo Op.
Since their uncle's funeral, the whole tone of UK reporters have changed- suddenly there's subtle protection of Harry. I believe you that there's something brewing behind the scene.
I wish something could be done to make those accountable for printing that thing's version of events without proper investigation. How does this happen? What went on here? Why did they give her that power? Disturbing. Troubling!!
Thank you for keeping up with all these points, we need answers as to why Guy didn't do the 6 months quarantine (I believe was required) for any animal entering the UK . ?!!
I imported 2 dogs.... from France and Poland. A rabies vaccine was given at 12 weeks, then 4 weeks later a titre was done to check the body was producing antibodies to rabies. If the results were as required, the dogs can be imported, if not, the process is repeated. It's a kinder way to import because the animal as my dogs remained with their breeder. The 6 months of quarantine in kennels for puppies, particularly was stressful and in my opinion, cruel.
Glad there is some vindication for Camilla Tominey, Rebecca English and her I do like, Richard Kay and quite a few others really annoy me. I agree with you, Harry weaponised her, he is a traitor to his own family, end of story. I really enjoy your plain speaking and agree with your comments.
I just watched a video that Guy passed away in October. So Meghan sat of that fake heartfelt dedication to pitch her new show. It was more about her than the dog.
You have a mind like a trap Shauna! You are better than most investigative journalists and it’s obvious you are not spinning anything, just bringing the raw truth in an easily understandable way. You are a treasure! Vanity Fair, did you know they never featured our beautiful and classy First Lady on their cover? I hope they get it right this time around, they get another 4 year chance to show they are not woke and biased. Let me know what you think the chances are. 😂
Vanity fair, was doing a deep, dive into G. Paltrow, she was terrified, it was going to ruin her. Everyone was on the edge of their seat, they were fighting it out, gossip was everywhere, then crickets. After that, they went down hill. Maybe she bought the magazine 😊
Vanity Fair had that bullet in the chamber for a while. I think their ill timed and ill advised scenic tragedy tour, where they literally strolled across the ashes of someone’s life, when residents had still not been allowed in to see what, if anything was left of their home. Add in the group photos, with Meghan standing front and center while standing upon the rubble of someone’s home as if they were taking a photo at a 5K Charity Fun Run. Then Meghan doing it again the next day was enough to make Vanity Fair pull the trigger on that profile piece.
H will only be able to hold those in power accountable, however, if he can actually prove HIS specific case (and of course, Tom Watson can do the same with his) - and unfortunately, as noble as his background aspiration for this case may be, it is also mired in his own motives of personal spite and a very clouded mental process based in his sense of entitlement, by which he seems to imagine that his opinion is fact and he doesn't have to provide or cite any actual hard facts.
If Trevor ever writes about her behaviour, how she was chasing him, married and than dumped him when he got her the Suits role etc. Will finish her for sure.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Some have gone to extraordinary lengths to spin Vanity Fair’s latest hot take in their favour!
I examine that & also the recent appointment of Clive Irving to cover the Harry Vs Murdoch court case.
Read Woman's Day Jan 20th .States Ms going to do solo tours inc Aus She thinks King C Charles had a lukewarm tour of Aus and she thinķs her tour was a resounding success, why do Msm paint the wrong information about King Cs tour Can't you do anything about stopping M
@@alenaatze7416 She will get zero attention without H at her side.
@@alenaatze7416 , it seems Megan lives in a bubble of her making where she believes all her own publicity. Initially Harry and his new wife were received well in Australia. We were glad Harry found someone, and we hoped for the best for him and his unknown wife. THEN how she behaved at Admiralty House leaked out on online forums. Does she believe WE live in a bubble too, and we wouldn't find out? In case the 17 proven lies told on the Oprah interview passed over people's heads, we have also had several years of hearing about her diva behaviour and mistruths. She won't feel welcome in Australia.
I believe that the Vanity Fair Article is pure, unadulterated Snark!!! It has shown that since leaving the Royal Family the Harkles have produced Nothing, Swat, Zero and indeed they have trashed, lied and bullied their way into the Media.
@@alenaatze7416I hope not. She just wants people to greet her like they lined up to greet KCIII and QC. I didn’t get there on time as I was working but my children aged in their 20s went and cheered and loved the crowds. No one who likes the RF would greet her. Why would she be here? Pushing a race agenda? Teaching or talking about acting? Giving parenting seminars? She has the opposite of the Midas touch.
I’m still so angry that Vanity Fair didn’t point out the gruesome twosomes back tracking over the racism lies !!
Me too! They just kept that BS narrative going.
Actually none of the magazines or MSM reported on it much in the USA. Only RUclipsrs and some of the British press.
Yes, they "never said that" yet they accepted an award for exposing it.
Agree.. we all watched Harry sit there and back pedal on his racism lie.
Yes!
More than anything else, Henry appeared to smirk at "the curtsy".
Absolutely he was smirking. I don't think he looked uncomfortable in the least.
Precisely. After all, we heard him asking on camera how do you explain to people that you curtesy to your grandmother. I don't know, maybe he should have gotten pointers from his aunt who curtsied to her mum to the end of the queen's life.
I thought he smirked to cover disgust and desperation. Same as when she talked over him in the Oprah show
Harry is just like her...maybe even worse.
He's so entitled and so self-righteous, he believes he has the right to use people for his purposes.
Meghan’s tribute to Guy was all about Meghan.
and who writes (and then publishes) an emotional tribute to their pet, and signs it 'Yours ever, Meghan'???????
Everything is all about Megain
Most of that video is her and Guy. And the whole obituary of 600 words or something...
“He Weaponized Her!”
Perfectly described Shauna!
Harry is letting Megan do his dirty work for him.
What has really bothered me with the mainstream press in the US and the UK is how they have allowed M to get away with how she has treated her father. No matter what our opinion of Thomas Markle Sr fact is M owes her father everything. He was the present parent during her childhood, he raised her as a single father, he paid for all her private education. He was owed at the very minimum respect for all the sacrifices he made for his daughter and the press should have never allowed her to get away with the cruel way she treated that man.
As horrible as this may sound, it's nobody else's business!
It is between her and her father.
It's only social media subs who want her punished.
Also, as annoying and cringy H&M can be and yes they are tone deaf and see themselves as far more important than they actually are, they haven't broken any Laws as yet. 😬
agreed
@@kerrylennox7359 I entirely disagree on the it's nobody else's business, she made it very public by leaking(imo) that "Dear Daddy" letter to humiliate her father and toss him under the bus.
@@kerrylennox7359Why do you think M would be punished by Thomas Sr being defended in his role as single parent, provider and protector who raised M by himself while working as an award winning Lighting Director? How would that 'punish' M?
@@kerrylennox7359 I have to say I agree. I'm very much not a fan of MM but her relationship with her father shouldn't be tabloid fodder. Difficult family dynamics/relationships are painful for everyone involved and I don't see how the media talking about it is beneficial to anyone.
There's enough video and picture evidence of her being quiet- aggressive. In one of the Netflix videos, there was a scene where Harry was looking like a real simp and she was saying "It is YOUR brother." How she said it, it was very cutting of Harry. Also there's the pictures in Jamaica when she crashed Skip's wedding. You can see her clenched jaw and teeth while talking to the waiter. There's many more in her interviews as well, when her mask slips off. I can always believe the bullying stories about her.
Those pictures of Meghan after she followed Harry to the wedding are scary. She looks like an absolute stalker.
@@pameladigaetano8119 Agreed. She looks scary.
Also the finger-wagging she has done at William - per Waaaagh. So disrespectful. I can't even imagine what is going on behind closed doors.
Looks like a mental case in Jamaica photos.
There are so many instances of cameras catching her mask in a state of slippage.😉 Especially memorable was the time her mother had the audacity to interrupt her. Markle's face was like thunder as she whipped her head around and glared at her mother. I also give you "HAND" as evidence of her domineering behaviour. Vanity Fair seems to be a little too soft in their exposé of the tyrant that is Markle.
Once a traitor; ALWAYS a traitor! As for being embarrassed for the curtsy...I don't buy that for one second! 🤢🤢🤢
According to Neil Sean NDAs are ending so maybe Vanity Fair now have receipts
Hope so! It’s all coming out now😊
@ant_yw4934 once this circus is all over I hope we get to concentrate on true villains. MeAgain and Harry have been so easy to spot that they have opened my eyes to traits in others.
I've signed an NDA for my previous high profile celebrity employers and there's no expiry date on there. So not sure how true that is. Obviously, each contract can be different
Trump signed a free speech order could that affect an NDA? or is it different? @@sarahwhyld5596
I’m still unsure why these NDAs stand. Isn’t “hostile workplace” a reportable situation?
This has highlighted that specific type of bullying that makes you feel like you're going mad. You question yourself and that's how they trap you.
It's far more insidious than someone shouting and barking.
This is why she's so dangerous. People need to keep calling this manipulative cow out.
Harry is just as culpable as an enabler.
The UK staff said Harry yelled at them and one was abused over the telephone by Harry
He was as bad and when William fronted him about it he started yelling at him Thats when Harry ended in the dog bowl. Harry didn't stick up for his little niece...that tells you everything.
Miranda Priestly without the wit and the style.
@@usercarefree44The dog bowl comment, never fails to give me a laugh 😂
Hello Shauna xx
I agree - it's over for Vanity Fair, People, town and country, US weekly, Vogue and Netlix who have been the propoganda machines for the dubious duo. Still to this day they are doing it. Shame on them all!
Now that Trump is sworn in you will see how it all starts to winde down.
@@americanwoman445i think trump has bigger fish to fry
@americanwoman445 No, it won't. He loves all those publications as long as they like and adore him. Its going to be an interesting four years...
Why does no one mention the gushing articles coming out of “Hello” magazine? Gushing, gushing, gushing.
Who buys these magazines anymore? I haven’t purchased a magazine in decades. The subscriptions became too expensive for sub par content.
What havoc caused by one person
All this attention and chaos is a narcissist's dream. But I know they are NEVER happy. Nothing is enough. They are hollow and empty
It was both of them and the gossip rags were complicit because of the $$$$ involved.
I'm absolutely not buying Lady C's line that Vanity Fair are now savouring a dish of satisfyingly ice-cold revenge for which they have waited long patient years. This is simply opportunistic - they are doing whatever they can to get readers, just as they always have, and now the wind seems to be blowing against M rather than with her, they've suddenly found a small amount of cautious courage.
Yes because they still talked out of both sides of their mouths.
Agree, and do you still follow Lady C? She also grifted our desire for the true and had us following her 2023 under the premise on the big reveal in spring 2024….and was her book that reveled nothing. Just exploiting 😂
No surprise. All publications do this.
I can't listen to Lady C anymore. She acts like she knows so much knowledge from sources in the palace, but everything she's said never happened or wasn't correct. She kept saying the truth about the kids would be out. She said last Spring it would come out, then it was Summer, then Fall, etc. LOL I just think she's all gossip.
@nikki2kk and worst if all, denied she ever said it . 🙄
Yanky Wally tried to tell everyone, and we all know what Harry and Meghan did to Wally. I'd like to see them try and take you down, corner an Aussie and they'll find out what we are made of. Enjoyed your reporting, thank you.
Just look at what happened to ashli / danja zone both her and her mothers house was deliberately set on fire with Ashley's cat being killed she had such a bad time of it god rest her soul
@@fayarmitage6877 Yes sadly so many have been hurt trying to tell the truth.
We Iove you Aussie's!
They have a tiger by the tail if they troubling a Aussie😅😅😂.
HUGGY AND DRUGGY ARE FINISHED
Dominick Dunne wrote for Vanity Fair - he was an excellent investigative reporter. Those were the days.
He was for sure.
One of the best! An excellent researcher who had a great grasp of words
I loved his articles!
Evidently she was caught creeping around Royal residences taking photos and mapping things out. Photographing the children sleeping etc. This was not just an offensive thing to do regarding the family but was a huge security risk. That is why I think the Queen got rid of her.
That was before she was engaged.
It was after the wedding. They were living at Kensington Palace in apartments that were renovated (for millions) and that the Glouster's moved out of to allow H and MM to occupy. Prince William caught her and that was it-- they were dispatched to Frogmore Cottage. A diamond bracelet that HLMQE lent to Catherine had also disappeared. MM is dangerous and she's more than a loose cannon. The RF are the ones who need security, not traitor H and his unstable (imo) wife
It was after the wedding. They were living in Kensington Palace in renovated (for millions) apartments that the Glouster's left to allow H and MM to occupy. Prince William caught M snooping around and that was it-- they were dispatched to Frogmore Cottage. A diamond bracelet belonging to QEII, that had been lent to Princess Catherine, had also gone missing. MM and H are dangerous and unbalanced in my opinion. The RF--especially the Wales'--need extra security for their protection from those two.
She is a dangerous person in my opinion. Getting pictures of the kids is sick. That's predatory behaviour. Trying to sell those I would assume. Horrible. I heard she did steal things too. I don't put it past her since she stole clothing and shoes from Suits' wardrobe and commercial photoshoot (Reitmans). I think she got kicked out and that's why her and Haz went crazy after the monarchy. Just like a toddler having a tantrum. LOL
@@Linda-vt5iq She did say, they are only one plain crash from the throne.
I think the 1st time Harry told Meghan what to do was the last. When he told her twice to turn around on the balcony, the look on her face said , harry youre going to pay for that.
Didn't Harry single out Camilla for some harsh biting comments in his book.
As well as Catherine and the king. Oh yeah, and William got an extra sausage.
It's very sinister when someone quietly intimidates another person.
I had a Director I was Executive Assistant to, she was just like that.
I think to a degree Nutmeg is dangerous. In the sense her ego is not going to go away quietly, and she will take everyone down with her. We know she holds no allegiance, and we know she has a bitter, mean girl side to her. At this time ,who does she have left fighting her corner. So what does she have to lose.
Yes
But her problem now is that, whatever she says, she will not be believed.
You only have to look at her PR for the last 5 years and who trolls on her behalf, the attacks on people speaking against them, including journalists and RUclipsrs. Her destructive behaviour has already hurt a lot of people.
Meghan has control of Harry's (alleged) children. If she is narcissistic, she is more concerned with her own needs instead of her children. She can do a lot of damage.
Who knows what she is like as a parent? She may be the best parent on the planet. We just don't know.
@cherfromtn8225 which leads me to think she is not a great mom. IF they exist, then I have no doubt that Dimbo thinks he is doing the best by them of keeping them safe under a cloak of anonymity. ( I would argue that this course is only putting them in more danger). But Nutmeg has not given any sign of being a caring mother. And judging from the way she treats anybody that is in any way close to her, I don't hold out much hope that they would be her priority. The more she sees people around her, not only deserting her, but turning against her, how is she going to be able to channel or even make sense of what she sees as betrayal. If those children are real, then I would suggest now is the time for the RF to intervene in some way. But this is what leans me more into them, either nonexistent or some other reason for the RF not to have any concern for them. Either way. I think there's a huge storm on the horizon
Passive aggression. The weapon of the narcissist
Oh yes.
I've dealt with one for several years. Then, one day, I found on the internet how to deal with narcs and all I can say is
knowing is half the battle.
I wish someone knew what happened to the little Guy.
Well if I were to venture a guess, some trauma. I’ve worked with animals in various capacities for 4 decades and two front legs being operated on simultaneously is rare. Beagles typically don’t have hip and elbow diseases but even then vets prefer one surgery at a time. Injuries like that are commonly found from abuse (thrown out of a car, thrown from a second or third story window, even mean nasty teenage boys) or just by being loose and being hit by a car. I’m not suggesting anything. I’m just speaking from my experience.
We've had many dogs, and never had one who broke even one leg! I've always wondered what happened to Guy! 😢
Something came up on Kinsey S this morning she had some information about the Pasadena walk through. Apparently all the volunteers had to ‘take 15’ when they arrived so the only people there at the time was their team and the paps.
What happened to true investigative journalism? Thank you Shauna. ❤ from the Gold Coast Australia 🇦🇺🦘👌🏻
It doesn't exist in the MSM at any level.
It's down to RUclipsrs now...!
If it wasn't for serious investigative reporting Watergate would never have happened. Such a shame that journalists no longer seem to do that.
Not much compared to the last 4 years
Get Forest Gump onto it, he's the one that brought Watergate into the open 😂😂😂😂
That was magnificent!
We haven't heard whisperings of the next faux royal tour for a while. Maybe the Crown did some preemptive work or maybe they are too separate or Harry had enough taking the backseat to her "Highness".
Unfortunately, the people who own newspapers don't invest in the type of journalism that uncovered Watergate, but even then, look at the threats the Washington Post faced over publishing the Pentagon Papers.
TMjr said long ago that Megsy should …”never be alone with animals or young children”. 😳
Money is an attractive thing for a sociopath! 🤑💰🤑💰🤑😲
Oh, that curtsey! He had a nasty little smirk on his face, when she did it! I think he relished the thought of making his family and their traditions look ridiculous!
I think Netflix included that - and even if H&M didn't want it into the show - they did had some creative control.
We saw the whisper shout at the Queen's funeral with the person trying to gather the flowers.
So dis I. And the bit where she crossed the road and tried to get in front of Prince William. She had to be firmly escorted back to her side. Then she wouldn't let go of the flowers. She was always a nightmare, imo.
Good catch!
Vanity Fair has been garbage for years
@@azzahjensen6110 Not the same magazine that I used to buy just to read Christopher Hitchens
Logic always prevails with your analysis, so thanks Shauna!! The amount of money those two have wasted on PR must be colossal but to no avail! From RUclipsrs like you, to journalists like Camilla Tominey, you are brave to call them & dubious reports out.
Megyn Kelly...
Vanity Fair should realise that the piece is NOT news. Many will not be heavily invested in reading the article because it’s just a repeat of what everyone already knows. Not saying that the article doesn’t deserve any attention, but if they really want ground breaking content, only one word: MEGNANCY.
I really appreciate you calling Harry out and telling it like it is! Keep up the great work!
Thank you for exposing Harry!
VF just deserting the sinking ship like all the other Hollywood types.
Such genuine folks that they are.
I notice Daniela Elser has switched sides too. Not that she’s Hollywood but she sure WAS a sugar.
She's done that often with her flippant reporting and probably change her tune again.🎶🎵🎶
Quite possibly.
And that dreadful Tessa Dunlop
She is a fence sitter.
@@Jude-y3p she used to write some VERY pro M and H pieces.. she’s slowly done quite a turn around, but that doesn’t mean that tomorrow she won’t come out with some pro Harkle nonsense and have a go at William and Catherine.
I think it all depends what side of bed she gets out of or what way she thinks the wind is blowing.
Bottom line is that Vanity Fair got a whole lot of publicity and sales from this turnaround.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. $$$$
5am here in the UK! I like Camilla she says it as it is. One day the whole truth might come out but I won’t hold my breath! Meanwhile keep up the good work exposing lazy journalists 😊
None of the sycophantic rubbish towards the couple would have ever been published by VF under previous Editors In chief.
Just saying
Yes, the papers, editors, owners, politicians, police do need to be shown their accountability. However, truth is 'once the horse has bolted there is no need to shut the gate'. Too little, too late, Harry.
It's never too late to hold Murdoch's feet to the fire. The heinous things Murdoch's editors did to ordinary people are unforgivable, this issue isn't about Harry.
Vanity Fair, too little too late.
Plus not addressing the racism claims against the Royal family and the British people.
Do you really think Harry will come prepared? I don’t think he will be able to prove his accusations
@claudiamcallister Of course he will come prepared. He will have learned from his past mistakes and listened to counsel from people with experience. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 I think this is where I would insert “PMSL”.
I don't think so . Last time he couldn't answer or show proof for anything just his word !
My feeling is if he wins, it was rigged.
Based on the dozens of witness statements he submitted which were chucked out by the judge because they contained only opinion instead of facts, I don't think either H or (more surprisingly) his legal team seem to understand what they are supposed to be doing.
I believe Harry will lose his temper when been crossed examined.
If Harry had been offered the same payout as William he would have accepted it and this wouldn't be happening.
Harry was hacked much less than William and also Catherine. So compensation was in respect of this. William gave all his compensation to Invictus games.
I have an uneasy feeling that he would not have give it all to charity, unlike William who gave it alll to charity and mostly to Invictus, Harry’s charity. I might be doing him an injustice in saying that.
@elainewood2947 no, you are not!
Precisely! He was offered a payout and refused it because he thought he was entitled to receive the same amount as William even though Harry was barely hacked.
William and Catherine hacked over 165 times. Harry 6....there is NO way Harry deserved the same settlement. And it was William who fought this case and won. Harry didn't want any part of it then. As usual Horrid Harry desperate to make it about him now.. He needs to stfu...he has used the Press to lie and print all his slurs and defamations against the RF that have proven to be utterly untrue .
Sharon stone said that in 2020 not 2025
I’ve been waiting for a truth train to pull up at the station for 5 (frustrating) years! I’m onboard and here for it 🍿! Great work Shauna.
When you said who do we turn to for accurate report I was saying we turn to you. Love spin cycle ❤
ME TOO 😄😄😄
Harry did not look uncomfortable watching Meghan's mock curtsey - he smirked at the end, he actually enjoyed that !
I moved in with a boyfriend years ago. His best mate lived there too. When my boyfriend wasn’t there the best mate would say the most horrible things to me. When I tried to tell my boyfriend he thought I was making it up. It was terrible.
Scary!!!! Hope you got out!!!
Record him!
Was the best mate jealous?
@ Very, very possibly Katie! Also I think the best mate wanted my boyfriend to be with another woman (in my guy’s past).
@@67oldcoach I got dumped by a guy for another guy at university. My ego took a bit of a beating because my replacement was a greasy little weasel. Hopefully not like me at all.
Sorry you had to go through that Shauna. I totally believe you. My mom told me to use the fact that I had hearing damage in one ear to deal with such people. "Could you speak up, that's my bad ear" or the kicker " just write it down, I'm not hearing you properly". Great fun that.
Great idea 😅
I love it! I kind of do the same -I simply ask "can you repeat that?"; or, better, repeat it myself verbatim but slower. It has a chilling effect! 😂
it was not fawning coverage, it was a passive-aggressive take down, so they can defend themselves either way if there is a lawsuit. But they really covered a lot of ground and in the end explained why these two will never find success.
Amen Shauna! I never thought Harry was bothered by Meghan's "curtsy" one bit. In fact, to me, he was smirking. He loves the way she behaves towards his family because she's his weapon. The only weapon he has.
I too remember Vanity when Dominick Dunne existed. What a great magazine. I would send it to my children at
Uni because they couldn't afford it. Journalism at its greatest.
Just woken up at an early for me, 5:15am and there you are Shauna ❤ snuggled up. Warm and cosy listening to your dulcet tones. Lovely way to start the day. Harry in court again, yawn yawn, he is in court more often than he is in Montecito
Harry in Court again? Yes - at taxpayers expense - I hope the idiot lose & drops all his other "revenge" cases! Sick of Judas continuing to try & benefit at Pa & the UK taxpayers expense! Greedy LFG!
@ he is rapidly becoming a vexatious litigant and hopefully one of the judges will take measures to stop him.
Shauna, you’re the bomb! To me he’s trying to prove he’s better than his brother. He’s obsessed with his rank within the family. If he wins he’ll be able to say Prince William didn’t have what it takes. He doesn’t understand that he was only a stepping stone to William. MM thought she was irresistible, hence Princess Catherine is the enemy!
Well said Shauna, keep it up, call them all out, I agree. Vanity Fair is too late, we already know all this, nothing new, they need to find some breaking news, something we do not know, now that would be a story.
Your analysis is excellent as usual! VF and other 'press' should be ashamed.
My narc boss smiled at me one day, and said, I'll get you you little b, I reported her to HR. Got nowhere ❤❤❤
Sorry you're dealing with that crap. Narc bosses are a great challenge. The best thing to do is keep a detailed diary on how you're treated by him/her and what was said, date, time, etc...of the events. It will pay off in the end. Keep calm and carry on! P.S. study how narcs operate. This will help, too.
My mom does this too. She very conversationally says absolutely destroying things and then acts "shocked" if anyone is upset, because we are just too "sensitive." She also had her outbursts that were a true shout, screaming fit with fists throwing too when I was younger, and I suspect against my poor sick dad in his final years.
I’m so sorry x
❤
😢
Thank you Shauna for calling out these two ridiculous fools😂. Vanity Fair is done. Poor little dog💔
I want to know how he got injured? Two broken legs and he was a older dog even then. When he was in the trailer for her new show he was on the dog bed all white in the face. She gave him a treat. He had been gone since Oct. When was the trailer made that he was still alive? And on the Christmas card both the beagles were young, no white faces on either dog? Odd When was that picture taken? Did the kids ride a bus to school and M and H were waiting for the bus to drop them off at the drive? It is all so odd. So many lies
Trailer and show were shot in April/May. It's alleged that Guy then died in October.
When he was hurt I heard a security guy run him over he had gotten out and was running around just as security was leaving
Allegedly that poor dog was only 8 years old
So agree with you about Vanity Fair.
The press will say whatever they need to to sell copies.
Meghan also thanked the staff of the Toronto veterinary hospital who treated and cared for Guy the beagle while he was recovering for the surgery on his broken legs. It was also stated in Harrys book the pair of them travelled each evening to Surrey to visit Guy who was under the care of Noel Fitzpatrick, treating the dog for broken legs. Huh?🤔
🤥🤥🤥
I knew what she was the second she slapped away the hand of the valet helping her out of the car on their wedding day…🤷♀️
I believe that statement from Sharon was from 5 years ago, not recently.
It was from 5 years ago, goes to show you how the Harkles are so devious. We now see how desperate they are. Hopefully Sharon Stone will put out a statement in reference to it being said years ago. It no longer stands.
I wish someone knew what happened to the little Guy
Vanity Fair used to be my favorite magazine. Then, Graydon Carter retired as editor, and it all went to hell. Very sad,as this publication has a long and revered history in the world of publishing, but they've dumbed it down so much, I'd rather read Us Weekly.
I’m reminded of Miranda Priestly in The Devil Wears Prada when you were talking about “quiet” yelling 😂😂
I think that Harry looked uncomfortable, when Meghan did that horrible curtsey, was only because he figured that everyone that loved Queen Elizabeth would eat that mock curtsey up, and not because it was the wrong thing to do.
The expression in her eyes during that curtsey was 'maniacal.'
He could have said or done something to sabotage that scene.
I don't think he looked uncomfortable. To me he had a smug smirk look.
Did you see him smirking? when she did that horrid curtsey, what a prat.
I think he was embarrassed, and that was a nervous smirk. I don’t want to defend the indefensible, but we know what she’s like, and he is weak and scared of her, especially in those early days, and if she insisted that curtsey be included he would have gone along with her even if he knew it was wrong. No excuse, but she probably took control of the whole show.
The main reason this is a top tier go to channel is Shauna’s ability to put together the facts and at the same time put aside feelings.
We don’t have enough of that anywhere. Whether MSM or RUclips and other independent creators.
You look striking in that blue! Great video as always.😊
Well said once again Shauna! Keep revealing the real truth.
female mp's signed an open letter en-masse about mm it infuriated me still does.
Her old age is ketchup to her. 😂😂😅
People just need to secretly record them, especially her to cover themselves when 💩💩💩hits the fan
That has occurred to me. But is it legal to make secret recordings in someone's else's home? (I am thinking here about people who work for her)
@ oh yeah I meant just those who work for them…..like a self protection thing…
Yeah recording everyone you see every day is illegal
@@DeAnn_Texas_America similar situation at work with a director ( nickname the tyrant troll). Lawyer's advice - ask that every instruction be put in writing. If the person refuses to comply, you can then record them stating this is to clarify your orders. May not be legal in other countries. Most lawyers will give a free 15 minute consultation. Unsurprisingly, once lawyers and recording were mentioned, the tyrant conveniently "retired".
👏🏽😌💜 Thank you, Shauna. Thank you for your legitimate journalism.
Hi Shauna. I know from some of your past comments that you have no love or respect for Rupert Murdoch (a view that I share, BTW), so I truly hope that this will not influence or bias your coverage of Harry's court case. That would amount to spin on your account, but I'm sure you will report without fear or favour.
@barrymorkell in my any ways Rupert Murdoch was a decent man and he came from a very honourable and decent family himself ,the best ! The much bigger concern is the family he is leaving behind to run the show There are factions within (not the head fortunately ) which could be threatening and dangerous The last court case within the family which he lost is very worrying I think
Thank you for reminding people that Vanity Fair once had proper, serious journalism and journalists. Dominick Dunne! Michael Wolff! Christopher Hitchens! Would love to hear the late, great Hitchens take on those two parasites.
Ooh just back from playing pennant lawn bowls, we won, and Shauna is on, how wonderful 🎉❤
Congratulations
The Seven Year Itch is real.
Difficult one could cope with! Dangerous is serious.
Harry had disgust on his face when old Meg did that ridiculous curtsy. It wasn't disgust for Meg it was disgust for his upbringing country and culture. A big middle finger to his family. A smug middle finger to all of the commonwealth.
Yet he did nothing and it stayed in the programme.
Harry looked at her kind of like ‘look at my wife, ain’t she grand’. He is too stupid in my opinion to think deeply about that performance of the bow which was all about Meghan thinking she is so entertaining ad above his beloved grandmother.
Totally agree. He's a tosser imo.
It wasn't just the mocking curtsy, it was also her sneering that the occasion/royal culture was like a tacky medieval banquet for tourists.
Nothing could distract when they're still saying Megan had a bad time in the castle. Especially every whim was taken care of
EXACTLY!! And after the LA Fires & seeing what they did and the backlash towards Harry & Meghan was just the icing and cherry on top. I think they just decided that there was no way to ignore this. After this last bit from H&M, I think Vanity Fair decided to quit helping. It's possible that some people at Vanity Fair personally knows some of the people in LA. Maybe someone they knew passed away as a result of LA Fires. Either way, Vanity Fair needs Hollywood more than Hollywood needs them. Plus, many high profile actors were helping others without the PR Photo Op.
We have a bully at work, she views some other people as targets not colleagues ❤🇬🇧
Since their uncle's funeral, the whole tone of UK reporters have changed- suddenly there's subtle protection of Harry. I believe you that there's something brewing behind the scene.
@@toogiit agreed!
I wish something could be done to make those accountable for printing that thing's version of events without proper investigation. How does this happen? What went on here? Why did they give her that power? Disturbing. Troubling!!
You deserve an award for this reporting.
Thank you for keeping up with all these points, we need answers as to why Guy didn't do the 6 months quarantine (I believe was required) for any animal entering the UK . ?!!
There are pet passports now. A vet has to sign off that a pet has had all relevent innoculations.
That stopped some years ago.
I imported 2 dogs.... from France and Poland. A rabies vaccine was given at 12 weeks, then 4 weeks later a titre was done to check the body was producing antibodies to rabies. If the results were as required, the dogs can be imported, if not, the process is repeated. It's a kinder way to import because the animal as my dogs remained with their breeder. The 6 months of quarantine in kennels for puppies, particularly was stressful and in my opinion, cruel.
Glad there is some vindication for Camilla Tominey, Rebecca English and her I do like, Richard Kay and quite a few others really annoy me. I agree with you, Harry weaponised her, he is a traitor to his own family, end of story. I really enjoy your plain speaking and agree with your comments.
I just watched a video that Guy passed away in October. So Meghan sat of that fake heartfelt dedication to pitch her new show. It was more about her than the dog.
You have a mind like a trap Shauna! You are better than most investigative journalists and it’s obvious you are not spinning anything, just bringing the raw truth in an easily understandable way. You are a treasure!
Vanity Fair, did you know they never featured our beautiful and classy First Lady on their cover? I hope they get it right this time around, they get another 4 year chance to show they are not woke and biased. Let me know what you think the chances are. 😂
Vanity fair, was doing a deep, dive into G. Paltrow, she was terrified, it was going to ruin her. Everyone was on the edge of their seat, they were fighting it out, gossip was everywhere, then crickets. After that, they went down hill. Maybe she bought the magazine 😊
The Sharon Stone comments were apparently from a few years ago.
This is gonna be good!
Yes it is.
Yea! What goes around, comes around ❤🇳🇿
I stopped buying magazines because nothing is ever true for so many years. Except your channel and Nieĺ Shaun I believe no one
I believe Taz
Thank you Shauna, so much disingenuous behaviour from some of these media outlets, it's not a good look.
I initially thought this too was a puff piece
Sad how far vanity fair has fallen 😢
Vanity Fair had that bullet in the chamber for a while.
I think their ill timed and ill advised scenic tragedy tour, where they literally strolled across the ashes of someone’s life, when residents had still not been allowed in to see what, if anything was left of their home.
Add in the group photos, with Meghan standing front and center while standing upon the rubble of someone’s home as if they were taking a photo at a 5K Charity Fun Run.
Then Meghan doing it again the next day was enough to make Vanity Fair pull the trigger on that profile piece.
Was it actually the next day or just same day/different shirt showing photos at a later date (as usual)?
H will only be able to hold those in power accountable, however, if he can actually prove HIS specific case (and of course, Tom Watson can do the same with his) - and unfortunately, as noble as his background aspiration for this case may be, it is also mired in his own motives of personal spite and a very clouded mental process based in his sense of entitlement, by which he seems to imagine that his opinion is fact and he doesn't have to provide or cite any actual hard facts.
If Trevor ever writes about her behaviour, how she was chasing him, married and than dumped him when he got her the Suits role etc. Will finish her for sure.
@pam1372
You are so right. I wish more people would realize this. She used him so badly