California: 8.1 Earthquake in Real Time!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 апр 2024
- Here's an 8.1 earthquake scenario animation in real time for Southern California!
--------------------------
24/7 LIVE Earthquake Monitoring - @GlobalQuake / @globalquake
----------------------
Music and sound effects provided by Epidemic Sound: share.epidemicsound.com/dp0zag
----------------
I hope my simulations will educate the general public about potential earthquake related hazards and create more curiosity about Earth Science in general. I do also hope that my videos will inspire a future generation of amazing architects, engineers and scientists! We all need to peacefully work together to make this world a better place. :)
My goal is to show people around the world the effects of different earthquake shaking levels on various buildings and structures.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @earthquakesim
Simulación de terremoto | simulazione di terremoti | भूकम्प सिमुलेशन | 地震シミュレーション | jarðskjálftauppgerð | Erdbebensimulation | 地震模拟 | भूकंप सिमुलेशन | deprem simülasyonu | simulare de cutremur | tremblement de terre
#地震ライブ #earthquake #地震
For MEDIA and INQUIRIES, you can reach out to me at:
earthquakesim@gmail.com
FAN MAIL
333 Busse Hwy, Park Ridge, IL 60068
P.O. Box 348
USA 
Наука
I was here in Los Angeles for the 1994 6.7 Northridge earthquake. All I wanted to do was keep sleeping. My parents made me get out of bed and take shelter 😂🫨
Everyone gangster until Northridge. That is still the scariest one for me. The Ridgecrest 7's were a sleeper though.
I was in that same earthquake. It changed my life. Ever since then I've been waiting for the big one.
It's coming
I went to Knotts that day
@@lameloball2471 surprised they even opened haha.
I am 77years young. Lived in California all my life . . .mostly SoCal...I believe the San Andreas quake will be a 9.2 or better. The fault line runs at the base of the San Bernardino Mountains through the Cajon Pass, crossing under the 15 freewqy, up Swarthout canyon and through the middle of Wrightwood and below Mountain High Skiing, and out to Lancaster and crossing the 14, and 5. In the Banning Beaumont Pass under the 10 Freeway. USGS forecasted a 7 to 15 foot shift of the pacific Plate north westward in 1998. I now am of the opinion it will be closer to 15 feet. This will cut of all these aforementioned roads and rail tracks, as well as downing all power lines. Not to mention the Water Canal from Northern Cal. Further, as to water - - - the canal and pipelines from the Colorado River will be cut off in the Palm Springs area - - -Flooding!
It is not possible for the San Andreas Fault to generate a magnitude 9.2 earthquake, even if the whole fault ruptures from the Salton Sea to Cape Mendocino. The maximum possible is around magnitude 8.3. The largest earthquake on the San Andreas Fault in the last 200 years was the 1857 Fort Tejon Earthquake that is estimated at magnitude 7.9. It had up to 30 feet (9 meters) of slip at the maximum location, so you are right that large earthquakes will cut major lifelines for Southern California.
@@ericfielding2540 Eric, I respect your opinion. My thinking on this subject is based on "outside the box" thinking based om the number of 9+ quakes in recent years. Either way, the resulting damage will be catastrophic - - beyond imagination and it will take place in a nanosecond. I has been 167 tears since 1857.
@@edroth7612 There is a fault partly under California that could generate a magnitude 9 to 9.2 earthquake, the Cascadia megathrust that starts north of Cape Mendocino in California and runs past Vancouver, British Columbia. That megathrust last ruptured in January 1700 with an estimated magnitude 9.0 earthquake, and it is locked and loaded now. The megathrust only reaches the surface off-shore, so it won’t cut infrastructure directly, but it will likely cause a catastrophic tsunami.
@@edroth7612 you need to take into account the close relationship between fault rupture area and magnitude. Cascadia has a potential rupture area to produce an Mw 9.0+ quake.....San Andreas is a more steeply dipping transform fault so max potential rupture area is smaller than for Cascadia and so is the max possible magnitude of any events on SAF. A low Mw 8 range event is the largest event SAF is capable of producing.
@@edroth7612I understand outside the box thinking I tottaly understand however I highly doubt the San Andreas can produce anything above 8.1 because it’s physically impossible according to most scientist who study faults
Also keeping in mind the potential for San Andreas to trigger other faults in the area such as the San Jacinto and Elsinore fault is higher than other fault systems since these faults are extensions of San Andreas. Even if they are not full ruptures of these faults because they are under populated areas even a M6 can be immensely damaging as a compounding effect after San Andreas
Nice, this is amazing work. Keep going. What is the software or platform do you use for the map simulation? I'm looking for similar online, but I hasn't succes. May you help me? It'll thankful.
me in NJ who just had an earthquake for the first time at 4.8 magnitude: *shocked pikachu face* how do you guys do it omg
Man this video is so cool ill sub :D
I grew up in Southern California in the sfv. i lived thru the quake in 1971 near the van Norman dam, and the Northeidge quakes 1n 1994. The Northridge quake was over 8.0 but was downgraded below 7.0 so taxes wouldn't be suspended.
Hey, this is great!
But i think that Magnitude 7.0 Earthquake in Luzon on July 2022 should be created in the next days!
I wanna see what intensity we felt after that earthquake
I was in imperial valley ,where this simulation starts , for the 9.0 earth quake out of Mexico city in 1986. It threw the water systems in imperial valley in chaos and my father had the Westmoreland water drinkable by noon. The earthquake shifted the foundation under my house 2' off and broke two legs on the city water tower
Cant wait to watch it in reap time on live tv 😊
I'm new to Los Angeles I live in Sherman Oaks.. why do the waves seem to be stagnated in Los Angeles?
The deep sedimentary basins under Los Angeles and the San Fernando Valley will amplify and extend the shaking in a large earthquake. Nearby locations in the mountains will have less and shorter shaking. The author does not explain how they did this simulation, but it looks reasonably realistic.
@@ericfielding2540 thank you for the answer which is not reassuring, Los Angeles seems more vulnerable to me and who had the fabulous idea of building the second city of the United States in this place 🙄
@@b-yamine Earthquakes were discovered after the San Francisco earthquake. The Spanish were confused on why the ground keeps shaking and destroying their missions. The Spanish wanted to build a town for farmland in SoCal. The area in LA is flat so they build the city there. After the USA took Cali from Mexico, they continued to build the city. After the San Francisco earthquake, scientists found out about the San Andreas fault line, and the fault line went right next to LA.
@@watermelonman6969 yes it's very logical... I've lived in the city recently and I work on the 17th floor of a tower block in the city center. I've never really thought about the earthquake but lately they've been obsessing me. I really don't know why 🤷 surely a phase that's happening
@@b-yamine Same
When is Greece gonna be ready)?
They say Cali is due for a massive earthquake between M9.0 and M10.0 in the next 50 years. It could happen at any time.
Whoever says magnitude 9 that’s impossible. The whole lenght of the San Andreas fault can only generate a magnitude 8.1-8.3.
@@EarthquakeSim , I thought it would be a 9 pr 10. When I think of the big one thats what I thought it will be.
@cowperson4763 "The big one" seems to be a term used for the San Andreas fault as well as the cascadia subduction zone. Both of them will affect california, but the cascadia subduction zone will really only affect northern california. The cascadia subduction zone is estimated to have the capability of producing around magnitude 9.0 at its upper limit. The San adreas fault is estimated to produce a low 8 at its upper limit. A 10.0 would require many thousands of kilometres of a subduction zone to rupture at once, with no single subduction zone being big enough. You would need multiple subduction zones to all rupture at once, which is incredibly incredibly unlikely, and even then, there still might not be enough energy stored within them to achieve a 10.
Those are some facts that I did not know about. Thanks.
Great video I rellay like your channel
thank you so much! when did you discover my channel?
I'm gonna guess this a worst case scenario, because the most likely prediction is something around 6.7-7.9 magnitude if the southern portion gets another earthquake.
This map is shown using ROMAN NUMERALS. THIS REFERS TO THE STRUCTURE DAMAGE at the various locations using the MERCALLI SCALE.
The bare numbers for earthquake intensity as widely reported are based on the RICHTER SCALE. It is based on each number being ten times greater that the lower number. It is about the total amount of energy released.
The MERCALLI Scale numbers begin with the letter "M" FOLLOWED BY A ROMAN NUMERAL. This is based on the physical view at the earth's surface of physical damage to various structures, according to a list of damages.
The M scale was modified in 1931 to be more precise and is named the MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY SCALE. It starts with letters "MMI"
I experienced the bay area earthquake in1989, was very scary...n I grew up in Imperial, El Centro Cal, n experienced many there also.
Id wish to see a simulation of a 5.6 earthquake caused by mt diablo thrust fault.
Seconded!
So many variations
I'd be level 7 because I'm from Victorvile
Can someone explain why this fault line moves upwards with its earthquake but other fault lines dont?
Parallel strike slip fault on a plate boundary.
Many others are subduction instead.
Ours pushes past each other and buckles upwards or splits apart at the surface.
San Diego always misses out 😑
Glad Simi Valley is a 7 compared to other towns
Just imagine a larger quake on the fault from the 94 Northridge quake.
What is the sim your using?
Which cities are going to be the safest from the big one
Ones out of California 🤣🤣🤣
@@brokenwrench404 I’m predicting that cities like Sacramento, Stockton, and Modesto won’t really experience the big one but maybe they might experience some light shaking with minor damage when the big one hit
@@jaydenprasad7950not really, the SF Bay is at risk for big earthquakes and probably even the big one and can impact Modesto And Stockton Maybe Even Sacramento
@@sixfifty_sebb time for my funeral and even though Modesto is in California that city has a low risk of earthquakes for California standards
Anything on a relatively low angle granit outcropping.
Anything on sandy soils, landfilll, marshland, river plains and valleys are subject to magnified shaking and liquification. Anything on steep slopes, shale or slate/similar stone layers, or bluffs of any siting are subject to major landslides or collapse.
There is solid granite outcroppings across parts of California. But good luck finding any with both water and affordable pricetags.
There’s hope
My Favorite City of Los Angeles
Mankind brought judgment to themselves.
si la noi nu vine cutremur in romania 81
1999 gölcük izmit Türkiye 7.6 earthquake please
What’s with the music though?
😮😮😮😮
surely you can do the southern fault
The next country
which is near the time
to have big earthquake
is California.
no noise signal.
lol bakersville Bakersfield
Zetas delets from planet
I am calling in the creator and the Angels of light to transmute this energy into the highest form of love and light!
In all honesty can you say that purging the region of masses of parasitic humanity and it's soulless concrete carpets smothering the earth and polluting the air and water and land is NOT the most high and pure outcome?
Humanity is not the center of the universe, nor are we usually the party least damaging to life around us.
I think a magnitude 7-7.5 is more likely!
Lumakas ng Lindol sa Los Angeles CA
Kailan Lumakas?
🙏🙏🙏😇🌏
ITs either spanish or vanish, No es una peticion, no i demand it!
am i first
?
When will I see real comments about the video instead of these people just saying “First hahahahahahaha”
@@CreeperTheLordseriously. 👍🏼
there will never be and earthquake of that magnitude in California
san Andreas is capable of a 8.0. but nothing greater so it is possible actually
Luckily we haven’t had a M8 in Ca. So far the largest recorded was a 7.9 at fort tejon/parkfield. They say the SAF is capable of a max low M8 so it’s not impossible
@@wowyzowy1895 They been saying that for how long lol
@@rayflash3121 since it produced a 7.9 in 1906
@@wowyzowy1895 its 2024 Right now
Fake news
???
Only a liberal democrat person l would share a scare tactic video like this one.
SMOKE CLOUDS SMOG SAN FRANCISCO SFOGG FRESNO EURIKA JVIUNUXAUQURJNQUX